Free Essay

Von What Grounds Have Liberals Defended Constitutionalism

In: English and Literature

Submitted By marwaaa13
Words 687
Pages 3
fvOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalism
On what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalism

On what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalismOn what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalism…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

What Liberal Studies Means to Me

...The question asked of us for the final exam harkens me back to 1985 and the John Hughes movie The Breakfast Club. In this movie, if your 1980’s pop culture memories have been fogged over by the passage of time, is about a group of students who are sentenced to Saturday detention “to ponder the error of (their) ways” because of misdeeds during the school week, and end up (spoiler alert) with a better understanding of themselves and each other. In other words in can be inferred that they found themselves, and during the Saturday detention, assisted others in finding themselves. I’m in no way implying that and entire Introduction to Liberal Studies class can be taught by locking students in a library for nine hours on a Saturday. With all Hollywood productions you need to suspend some of your disbelief. The question that I will answer is: What does Liberal Studies mean to you? I will touch on question two, which was to explain my goal for this program, but I feel it does not apply to me as I am graduating now. I instead will explain what Liberal Studies will mean to me going forward. An outstanding Professor at University once introduced me a notion, and I believe that I have grasped the concept he so elegantly explained. To be a successful leader is to allow others to find their voice. That leader will inspire and connect with his team on a spiritual, mental, emotional and physical level, and inspire others to find their voice. Getting back to the movie......

Words: 1289 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

On What Grounds Have Conservatives Supported Tradition and Continuity?

...On what grounds have conservatives supported tradition and continuity? “A state without the means of some change is without the means of conservatism.” This is the idea, quoted from Burke, that conservatism is not opposed to change, only radical reform. Conservatism developed out of the desire to avoid revolutions such as the one in France and was a reaction to the growing pace of political, social and economic change. The term “conservatism” comes from the word “conserve” which was derived from the Latin “conservare”; to keep and guard. A prominent core theme in conservative ideology is that of tradition, continuity and preservation. These underpinning concepts refer to the ideas, practices and institutions that have been inherited from an earlier period. However, as UK conservatism has been based rather heavily on the ideas of Edmund Burke, there is a general willingness to ‘change in order to conserve’ rather than a blind resistance to change itself. One way in which the majority of conservatives support tradition is through the maintenance of the aforementioned institutions and practices which have been ‘tried and tested’ over a long period of time. This, in a way, almost reflects Darwinism and ‘natural selection’, in the belief that the institutions that have in fact survived thus far have done so because they have been found of value and to function sufficiently. Therefore it is considered that they ought to be preserved for the benefit of the current living society...

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

What I Have Learned

...What Have I Learned By Charles Myers When I started this course I was not aware there were so many types of written communication being used in the work place. The field of technical communication is a lot more involved and diverse than what I was aware of. In my past line of work I was not exposed to much in the way of technical writing, I mainly used part drawings and something we called route sheets. These were documents that followed a part through the manufacturing process from start to finish. At the time I was using them I did not think about what went into designing them so they would be easy to read and interpret by all people who came in contact with them. Now I have a greater respect for people that have to design such documents on a daily basis. After taking this course I feel I would be more able to do something like this myself if the need ever comes. The course has also helped me see the need for having a well written resume in order find a better job once I complete my course of study. I have never needed a resume before in the field of work that I was in, but I can see that will probably change when I change careers. The field that I plan to go into will give me a greater chance to use the skills I have learned in this course more so than anything I have done before. I still do not consider myself to be a writer, but I am better prepared with the basics and have the course text that I can use to refer back on when the need arises. I now see that I......

Words: 623 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Liberalism and Constitutionalism

...On what grounds have liberals defended constitutionalism? Constitutionalism refers to the idea of a limited government achieved through the existence, either of external and usually legal checks on the power of government, notably in the form of a written constitution, and internal checks on government brought about by institutional fragmentation. Liberals support constitutionalism because they fear that government may become a tyranny against the individual, based on the assumption that power is inherently corrupting and concentrations of power will lead to absolute corruption. This assumption is rooted in the liberal view of human nature: as individualism implies self- interest, those with power over others are apt to abuse it for their benefit and at the expense of others. Liberals support constitutionalism as the powers of government bodies and politicians can be limited by the introduction of external and, usually, legal constraints. Written constitutions codify the major powers and responsibilities of government institutions within a single document, the first such document was written in 1787 in the US. Where a country has neither a written constitution nor bill of rights, liberals stress the importance of statute law in checking government power through the principle of the rule of law. Another reason why liberals support constitutionalism is because it can be established by the introduction of internal constraints which are effective in dispersing......

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

On What Grounds Have Liberals Defended Democracy?

...Liberals, no matter classical or modern, believe in small state. As Thomas Paine put it: "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil". This concept links nicely with the idea of democracy, which literally means "rule by people". Liberals have defended democracy on the grounds that people must have a way of protecting themselves against the government and its actions. This type of democracy is also referred to as protective democracy. Moreover, democracy opens an ability for people to choose. In a pure democracy, for instance, people would vote on every occasion and policy, hence the core liberal idea of individualism would flourish in its fullest. However, in modern society it is practically impossible to have pure democracy, so we have to resort to participatory democracy. This still support the idea of individualism, as each vote counts towards the end result. Moreover, democracy improves political participation as people know that their voices will be heard. It also encourages political education in order to make the best choice of the candidate, which links with the idea of reason and the core period in liberalism's history of enlightenment. By being rational and self-seeking, individuals will want the best for themselves, hence they will seek to vote for the candidate that suits their needs and beliefs best, In order to do so, they will have to read, debate or learn about them by other means, which will increase the overall intelligence of individuals......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45 Marks)

...Although it can be said that classical and modern liberals hold the same fundamental principles and ideas, it could also definitely be argued that modern liberalism moves away from the brutality of classical liberalism, and the two concepts have departed, with modern liberals focusing more on helping individuals achieve their potential and protecting them. With this said, both concepts do undoubtedly hold true the fundamental concept which is freedom of the individual; even if they interpret this concept in different ways. Whilst the moving away from classical liberalism holds to be true, because of concept such as neoliberalism, classical liberalism does still have an influence on every day life. One of the fundamental liberal principles is centered around freedom of the individual, and this can be said to be both one of the main similarities, and one of the main differences between modern and classical liberalism. Classical liberals believe in negative freedom; freedom being the absence of external constraints. The individual is therefore free: left alone and not interfered with or coerced by others. Classical liberals believe this leads to the formation of a meritocracy; where people can make a success of themselves based on their hard work and talents, and are not held back by the state when trying to do so. Modern liberals share this same concept of freedom and believe that the individual should be free to make the best of themselves through talent and hard work.......

Words: 1388 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

What I Have Learned

...A few Things I have learned in my 18 Years Life tosses a lot of lessons, some are difficult to learn and some are easier, it’s all about how you handle it. Something’s that life wants you to know, are little and stupid and seem life they don’t have any significance to your life. However, it is either going to educate you not to do it again, or it will be a amusing story to tell your friends down the road. The little things make life a little lighter sometimes where as the large things helps you open your eyes and helps you in the long run. Life has taught me numerous things. Everyday I learn something new, adding to that list. One of the very first things that I recall learning, is to not lie on the ground attempting to look underneath the vacuum when mom is in the middle of vacuuming. For some individuals, this lesson is one that does not need to be learned, but for me, it was something I had to learn. Spending hours of crying, as my mother pulled every strand of hair out, and hours of my mom being annoyed yet laughing about it anyways because how bizarre is it, that I got my hair stuck in the vacuum. While facing the pain, I thought I learned that I should steer clear of housework; my mom on the other hand, did not. Something else I have learned is that telling someone that they look ill or worn-out, isn’t going to make him or her feel better. I, of all people should know, this because if someone were to walk up to me and say something like that, my heart would...

Words: 1101 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45)

...To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism? (45) Liberalism has been active throughout Europe since the early 19th century, although the UKs first experience of Liberalism put into practice was in 1868 under Gladstone’s Liberal government. Early Liberalist ideas concentrated largely around core values of freedom, individualism and a minimal state. However, revisionists have deployed a modern liberalism, which in many ways have departed from core themes of Classic Liberals. Classic Liberalism has a heavy focus surrounding the core value of freedom, which also overlap the core theme of a minimalistic state. However, the evolution of liberalism, has brought about a different perspective as to what extent freedom should be exercised and at what point the state have a responsibility to implement restrictions. Early liberals such as John Locke and Adam Smith supported a ‘negative freedom’ whereby individuals were left to make their own choices without interferences from the state. J.S Mill another classic liberal proposed a very simple principle known as the Harm Principle. The harm principle is a concept which acknowledges the need for government intervention only when one’s action is physically detrimental to another. This again defends the concepts of both ‘negative freedom’ and a minimalistic state. Locke proposed the idea of ‘Natural Rights’ which specified god given rights such as life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The idea......

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

On What Grounds Have Conservatives Supported Private Property?

...the state; it provides a particular significance for conservatives. For traditional conservatives it can be justified on 3 main grounds- it provides security, a stake for people in society and can also be affiliated with an individuals’ personality. Conservatives state that property has a range of both psychological and social advantages. Property has been seen as a source of security in an uncertain and unpredictable world – something to ‘fall back on’. Therefore property, whether this is the ownership of a house or savings in the bank, provides individuals with a source of protection. Conservatives consequently believe that thrift (the caution in the management of money) is a virtue and seeks to encourage private savings and investment in property. Property ownership also promotes a range of important social values. Those who possess their own property are more likely to respect the property of others, which means that they will be law-abiding and support authority. Property hence gives people a ‘stake’ in society; they have an interest, in particular, in maintaining law and order. In this sense property helps promote conservative values, mainly respect for law, authority and maintaining social order. As well as this, property can be regarded as an extension of an individual’s personality. People ‘realise’ themselves, even see themselves, in what they own. Possessions are not merely external objects, valued because they are useful, but also reflect something of the......

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Have Modern Liberals Abandoned Individualism and Embraced Collectivism?

...I) -individualism is the belief in the supreme importance of the individual over any social group or collective body. For classic liberals, this is heavily associated with attempts to contract or minimise the state with a view to widen individual freedom and strengthen individual responsibility. -modern liberalism, aka '20th c lib' is a branch of liberal theory that emerged as a response to the spread of poverty ignorance and disease in the post-industrial era, stressing the importance of egoistical individualism, negative freedom, enabling state and economic management. -due to such developments, classic liberals have accused modern liberals of abandoning individualism and embracing collectivism, which is the belief that collective human endeavour is of greater moral & practical value to individual self striving and that human beings have a social core. Collectivism is commonly associated with pushing the state forward, as the state is a mechanism through which collective energies are harnessed and collective ends achieved. A) -Modern liberalism have been accused of embracing collectivism because of the extent to which which they are prepared to support government intervention in social/economic affairs via an 'enabling/interventionist state'. Classic liberals understand freedom in negative terms, believing the absence of external legal/physical constraints as a condition for autonomy, but recognise that some authority is needed via a neutral arbiter amongst egoistical......

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

On What Grounds Have Liberals Supported Democracy?

...Liberals have justified democracy as they believe they must have a means of protecting themselves from the intervention of government. This is sometimes seen as protective democracy, and it, for example, allows tax-payers to protect their property by controlling the composition of the tax-making body – hence the principle of ‘no taxation without representation’. Utilitarians have also linked democracy to the ability of individuals to advance or defend their interests, meaning that political democracy promotes ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number’. Democracy has also been endorsed on the grounds that political participation has educational advantages. By participating in political life, citizens enhance their understanding, strengthen their sensibilities and achieve a higher level of personal development. This is sometimes called developmental democracy. Mill believed in individuality and fulfilling potential. A more modern liberal defence of democracy draws on pluralist ideas in arguing that democracy is the best means of maintaining equilibrium within complex and fluid modern societies. As democracy gives competing groups a political voice, it binds them to the political system and so maintains political stability. Democracy is rule by the people. Its ‘liberal’ features are reflected in a network of internal and external checks on government in order to protect citizens against the state and guarantee liberty. Therefore, democracy in most of the western......

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

To What Extent Have Modern Liberals Departed from the Ideas of Classical Liberalism?

...To what extent have modern liberals departed from the ideas of classical liberalism? (45 marks) The two branches of modern liberalism and classical liberalism naturally clash within the ideology of liberalism itself. There are fundamental ideas that form criteria for debate across the two coexisting views, although they do possess various similarities with one another. Classical liberals often highlight the supreme importance of the individual, reflected in their desire to minimise the role of the state, whereas modern liberals take a more collective approach, and the see the expansion of the state as necessary based on the socio-economic circumstances of society. In this sense, modern liberalism can be viewed as a development on classical liberal thinking; it is only in the new ideas that modern liberalism brought about upon which they are fundamentally different. Modern liberalism can be viewed as taking a strong departure from classical liberalism based on their ideas of freedom. Firstly, classical liberals have believed in the idea of negative freedom, meaning non-interference or freedom from external interference of any sort; individuals should be left alone to make their own decisions. The government or state, external to the individual, should act as a ‘night watchman’, as summarized by the classical liberal John Locke, meaning its primary role should merely be to oversee society to keep law and order in place and the state in check. An extension of this classical......

Words: 1607 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Liberals Disagree over Freedom

...To what extent do liberals disagree over freedom? (15) Liberals believe that each human being is an individual who is rational. Therefore implying that each individual should have freedom. However the extent to this freedom causes a divide within liberals, as shown by Isiah Berlin who distinguished between ‘negative’ liberty and ‘positive’ liberty. Liberals disagree over the extent and nature of freedom. ‘Negative’ liberty supported by classic liberals implies that individuals should be free from constraint, free from external restriction and a lack of interference allowing for freedom of choice therefore a need for the rolling back of the state. This firm belief in individualism-as humans are rational, leads to the classic liberal belief that individuals can flourish without state intervention as human beings are self-interested creatures who are self-reliant and therefore create an atomistic society. This freedom supported by classic liberals allows individuals to act as they wish whatever the consequences as the consequences can’t be said to limit freedom (as that would be against their belief of complete freedom) but are bad luck, not caused by the state therefore the objects that interfere with the classic liberals ideas of freedom include state legislations not natural occurrences that can’t be stopped. Therefore they believe in the silence of the laws to ensure freedom. Modern liberals on the other hand who believe in ‘positive’ freedom have a different idea of......

Words: 594 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Have Liberals Agreed over Freedom?

...To what extent have liberals agreed over freedom? Liberals believe that human beings are first and foremost, individuals, endowed with reason. This implies that each individual should enjoy the maximum possible freedom consistent with a like freedom for all. Belief in the supreme importance of the individual leads naturally to a commitment to individual freedom. Isaiah Berlin distinguished between a `negative' theory of liberty and a `positive' one. Early liberals have believed in Negative Freedom. It is the absence of external restrictions and constraints upon the individual, usually understood as non-interference. It is often associated with freedom of choice and importance of privacy. However, classical liberals feared that `free' individuals may exploit others for their own interest and advantage hence why law and government are necessary. Negative freedom is therefore upheld primarily through checks and balances proposed by Montesquieu on government power through codified constitutions and bills of rights. Examples of negative freedom include civil liberties, such as freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of movement and freedom of religious worship. Modern liberals, on the other hand, believed that the unrestrained freedom promoted by classical liberalism has brought about new forms of poverty and injustice. T.H. Green challenged the classical liberal notion of liberty. Negative freedom merely removes external constraints on the individual, giving......

Words: 360 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

To Do What You Have to

...linguistic backgrounds to be able to communicate. Latin, like other languages past and present, had more than one form and changed over time because it was both written and spoken, and the educational level or social status of the writer or speaker often determined the final form of the language. Latin was also influenced by local languages spoken or written within the larger territory under the influence of what later came to be known as the Roman Empire. During the Carolingian Renaissance, throughout the reign of Charlemagne and his successors, the development of Latin literacy was greatly promoted. Although reading and writing were skills that some people had, literacy was not widespread before that time. Literacy in Latin was generally limited to people of the upper classes and members of the clergy. Charlemagne invited Alcuin of York to become his personal tutor and the head of his court school. Charlemagne charged Alcuin with the development of a literacy curriculum for children that would provide for their instruction in reading and writing, as well as for further study in the liberal arts and theology, thereby also furthering the Christian teachings that Charlemagne’s court promoted. The promotion of literacy impacted education and language throughout the region. The demand for material relating to the interests of the ruling military class increased. Over time, vernacular languages, the languages commonly spoken, began to be used by writers. Until the 12th century,......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3