# Wacc Project

Submitted By aliknow
Words 944
Pages 4
WACC Project
On Amazon
Due Date: January 16, 2016
Name:
Professor

Finding the weighted average cost of capital for Amazon.com
Ticker: AMNZ
Amazon is an American publically traded company and is one of the largest retailing firms headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The reason why I chose this firm is that it has equity, debt and lease payments in its capital structure. The following are the calculations performed in order to determine the WACC for the firm. Cost of debt
According to Moody’s report for year 2014, the credit rating of Baa1 reflects excellent liquidity and financial policy for the shareholders (Moody, 2014). Even though the article reflected it to be a positive sign for the firm, still the rating is quiet low.
Based on the financial statements of Amazon.com, if the firm has good credit ratings it must add 0.625% to the LIBOR rate in order to derive the cost of debt and if the rating is poor it must add 1% to the LIBOR rate (Amazon, 2014). I presume the credit rating to be extremely low so adopting a conservative approach, I have rather added 2% to the rate:
The cost of debt for Amazon.com therefore is:
KD= RF + spread KD= 0.561% + 2%
KD = 2.561%
For Amazon.com, the interest rate is the function of LIBOR rate so the book value approximately equals the market value. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is \$9.981 billion (\$9.1 billion for notes and \$881 million for other long-term debt) as stated in the note 6 to the financial statements.
Cost of equity
The method preferred for calculating the cost of equity for Amazon.com is by applying CAPM model. The beta for 2014 has been determined by using the daily returns of market index i.e. S&P 500 and the stock (Finance, 2014). The results were as shown in the table below: Covariance | 0.000069 | Variance | 0.000050 | Beta | 1.380 |
Formula used for beta is:
Beta=...

### Similar Documents

#### Nike Wacc Project

...Nike Wacc: September 2013 Find the Values of the Components in the Capital Structure E = 890.35M shares \$65.40 = \$58,228.89 million P = N/A L= 1447.358M B = 826.041M V = 58,228.89M + 826.041M + 0 + 1447.358M= \$60,502.289M Find the Weights of the Components in the Capital Structure E/V = 58,228.89/60,502.289= 0.962 B/V = 826.041/60,502.289 = 0.0137 L/V = 1447.358/60,502.289 = 0.0239 Find the Component Marginal Costs of Capital kd = 0.0769 {see table} ke = rf + β(km - rf) = 0.0389 + .61(0.57) = 0.07367{CAPM} kL = kd(1-t) + ρL = .0769 (1-.35) + .02 = .069985 Plug into the Equation and Hack the WACC ka = ke(E/V) + kd(1 – t)(B/V) + kp(P/V) + kL(L/V) ka = 0.07367(0.962) + 0.0769(1 - 0.35)(0.0137) + 0.069985(0.0239) ka = 0.0732 0.07 The Cost of Capital Project: Nike Objective The assignment at hand is to estimate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for Nike at the current time. The Primary Equations The theory of why managers should use WACC in net present value analysis comes later in the course. For now, start with the equations for WACC, per se: ka = ke(E/V) + kd(1 – t)(B/V) + kp(P/V) + kL(L/V) [1] V = E + B + P + L The symbol, ka, is the same as WACC. V is the total market value of the corporation. Table 1: | Nike: September 9, 2013: Long-Term......

Words: 1239 - Pages: 5

#### Cost of Capital Project (Wacc)

...Colby Wagoner Cost of Capital Project(WACC) FIN 4422 T: 7:10-10 1. Marginal Cost of Debt: Kd= rf + Spread Kd= .0295(or 2.95%) + .0577(or 5.77%)= .0875(or 8.75%) 2. Marginal Cost of Equity: Ke= Kd+Risk Premium Risk Premium for choosing to invest in a more risky asset, the premium will be set at 10% due to the the falling stock price and ROE has dropped to -200% making the risky stock unappealing so setting the premium as high as I did should influence investors. Ke= .0875+.10= .1875(or 18.75%) 3. Marginal Cost of Preferred Stock: Preferred Stock Return would be a little less, Costing us 17.75% because the preferred stock(even though this company does not have any) would be less risky because of the fact that shareholders of preferred stock would get payed before those holders of common stock. 4. Marginal Cost of Leasing: KL= Kd(1-T)+ Premium KL=.0875(1-.35)+.02= .0769(or 7.69%) Referring to my source, under leases, it says it has various % so .02 premium would seem appropriate due to an increased risk of default. “The Company enters into non-cancelable operating leases for retail stores, distribution facilities, equipment, and office space. Most leases have fixed rentals, with many of the real estate leases requiring normal and customary additional payments for real estate taxes and occupancy-related costs. Rent expense for leases having rent holidays, landlord incentives or scheduled rent increases is recorded on a straight-line......

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

#### Bus 5440 Google Wacc Project

...BUS 5440 Google WACC Project Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/bus-5440-google-wacc-project/ Google WACC Project In this project, you will find and discern the appropriate data to determine a realistic assessment of the weighted average cost of capital for Google. You will need to search for data from several sources, use subjective judgment to determine which data to use or discard, use subjective judgment to determine which calculation gives a more acceptable estimate and make some simplifying assumptions. The purpose of the projects is to show some of the sources of measurement errors in financial analysis, to introduce the diverse sources of publicly available financial information and to develop skill in analysis in situations where there are too much or too little data. Pages showing equations with data and brief description There is no page length given for this as it can vary greatly. This section is to be divided up based on the topics. In each section, you must show and explain the equations that are used. In addition, you are to draw any conclusions on the company you can from this data. Please note that detailed worksheets showing all of the calculations for this section are to be included in an appendix. Cost of Equity (Common Stock) Beta from Regression and two Betas from analysts Beta Chosen for CAPM and why Capital Assets Pricing Model (include how determined RF and[ RM or (RM – RF)] Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) (only...

Words: 447 - Pages: 2

#### Pan Europa Foods Case Study

...idea that can potentially put the shareholders in dilemma. They must improve the performance to make the investors come forward to invest in the business. They should concentrate in decreasing the capital spending and increasing the stock price and should decrease their debt by avoiding over spending. They should not increase their assets by debt financing as their debt –to-equity ratio is extremely high after the price war thus making them highly leveraged. Fabienne Morin and Nigel Humbolt should be leading these strategic improvement projects since they encouraged growth and increased market share. 2. While we have three different ways to calculate NPV from the exhibit, NPV at the minimum accepted Rate of Return includes a risk premium so it stays constant even with varying project durations. WACC on the other hand has difficulties in maintaining the capital structure therefore Equivalent Annuity should be used in this case. The order of the projects would be 1. Strategic Acquisition 2. Eastward Expansion 3. Snack Foods 4. Southward Expansion 5. Inventory Control System 6. Artificial Sweeteners 7. New Plant 8. Expanded Plant 9. Automation and Conveyor System 10. Expand Truck Fleet 11. Effluent Treatment Program Since the Effluent Treatment Program is not subjected to NPV, we can say it as an investment of \$4 million to compensate a cost of \$10 million in 4 years like mentioned in the case. 3. Political aspects of the organization,......

Words: 736 - Pages: 3

...Rank | Project Number | 1 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 8 | 8 | After looking at the data analysis in Exhibit 1, we are able to eliminate a few projects right away from the ranking of choices we would be interested in. After seeing that project 7 and 8 are mutually exclusive and 7 being a better project based on the quicker payback and initial returns. As well we can see that project 2 is in most regards, a terrible investment. We are able to see a negative NPV and an unacceptable MIRR which is lower than our desired discount rate. At a glance we are also able to see that project 6 is on the brink of acceptable which allows our investment team to accurately rank the three lowest projects on the list. One issue that must be regarded before being able to further progress through my reasons for rank is that the company has acknowledged the potential for the low WACC of 10% value. We are able to acknowledge that this rate in most cases is seen to be hire as noted by the board. From this I was able to slowly adjust the resulting analysis of data to utilize what I thought was to be most important by prioritizing NPV in relation to the increasing WACC value. After consideration I was able to justify that Project 7 is the best investment as the project is the only project that allows for a positive NPV once passing 14%, which may be...

Words: 261 - Pages: 2

#### Teletech 2005

...Analysis Teletech 2005 WACC and Hurdle Rate: Risk drives required returns and is a fundamental concept when determining whether or not a company is providing appropriate returns to its shareholders. Teletech’s policy was to use a uniform hurdle rate across segments. This policy works well if each potential investment has the same risk. Unfortunately for Teletech, investments differ in their level of risk and therefore in their required rates of return. To adequately assess potential investments, Teletech should implement a hurdle rate for each segment and potentially risk-adjust these hurdle rates for projects within each segment. As Teletech’s EVP of Telecommunications Services points out in his graph, a single hurdle rate for varying risk segments can be misleading and cause severe financial damage. Specifically it can lead to profitable projects being rejected and unprofitable projects being approved. In either case, shareholder value is not maximized. Exhibit 1 shows our WACC calculation for the Telecommunications Services (TS) and Product and Systems (PS) segments to be 8.5% and 11.7% respectively. Under Teletech’s single hurdle rate philosophy, projects in the TS segment would be rejected if ROC is projected to be below 9.3% even though they would be adding value if above 8.5%. Possibly even more detrimental, projects in the PS segment would be approved if ROC is above 9.3% even though they would be destroying value if below 11.7%. Additionally, the......

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

#### Cost Modeling

...Determining Project Coast, Budgeting, and Earned Value Cost Modeling For Professor Douglass Smith By Integrated Project Process Management (MSPM - 6120 - 2) Week 2 Application Spring Session Section B March 12, 2012 Abstract Theoretically, cost modeling is a set of assumptions about future project conditions that guide the projects for organizations of cash flows (Sanghera, 2010). Financial models that are utilized in project finance oft-times are troubled with diverse array problems. The reason for failure in projects is mainly due to not clearly defining and segregating various elements of the model; as well as the failure to include crucial information pertaining to the project. It is good practice to have the person who will be responsible for performing a specific activity to estimate the costs associated with the activity (Gido and Clements, 2010). In this paper we were asked to utilize quantitative analysis to perform 5 year and 10 year cash flow calculations utilizing internal rate of return IRR and Net present value to strategically determine which analysis yields the best fit for the project at hand. Keywords: cost modeling, cash flows, projects, quantitative, analysis, IRR, Internal rate of return, NPV, Net Present Value Developing a baseline schedule for a project is important; in addition the aforementioned it’s also necessary to develop a baseline budget. Baseline cost components of a project depend on the nature, size and location of the...

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

#### Pan-Europa Case

...Answer #1: Pan-Europa must strategically plan projects that can reduce its debt, improve its price-to-earnings ratio, increase profitability and regain its significant market share. In reference to Exhibit #2, the financial results that are important for the coming year are (Net income, Earnings per share, and Shareholder’s equity – market value). The price war has concluded and it is time for the members of the senior management committee to use the approved capital spending amount to implement strategically planned projects and to rally around a leader. Based on his experience, leadership traits, and vision in expanding the company’s core business, Nigel Humbolt should be considered the top candidate to lead Pan-Europa. Answer #2: After reviewing Exhibit #3 and the data that is represented, NPV was calculated using a 10.5% estimated weighted average cost of capital for Pan-Europa’s proposed projects. Taking this data into consideration, the ‘Strategic Acquisition’ project scored the highest ranking above all other projects due to its 47.97 WACC rating, NPV at minimum rate of return of 41.43 and an IRR of 28.7%. Project No. 11 7 8 9 4 10 2 3 5 1 6 Project Name Strategic Acquisition Eastward Expansion Southward Expansion Snack Foods Artificial Sweetener Inventory Control System New Plant Expanded Plant Automation & Conveyor System Expand Truck Fleet Effluent Treatment Program NPV at Corp. WACC (10.5%) 47.97 11.99 9.00 8.95 5.21 1.16 0.99 0.28 -0.87 -1.92 NPV not given Rank 1...

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5

#### Fin 575 Final Exam

...1. During the project initiation, a project charter is created. The project charter should include which of the following? • Project managers expenses • Analysis of budget • Selection of the senior project manager • Projects high-level deliverables 2. A project's budget should be based on a company’s • strategy and financial goals • profitability • financial goals and equity • debt load and equity 3. Earned value management is a technique used to integrate projects • resources • scope, schedule, and resources • schedule, costs, and benefits • costs and profits 4. Bill’s Billiards has total assets of \$8 million and a total asset turnover of 2.9 times. If the return on assets is 11%, what is Bill's profit margin? • 11% • 4.10% • 2.50% • 3.79% 5. What are the acceptance criteria for NPV? • If the NPV is less that \$0, accept the project. • If the NPV is greater than \$0, accept the project. • If the IRR is equal to 0%, reject the project. • If the NPV is equal to the discounted payback, accept the project. University of Phoenix Final Exam Study Guide FIN 575 Final Exam 6. The risk response plan answers what question? • What can be done if risk occurs? What is the backup plan? • What are project costs? • There is no need to plan for risk seldom occurs in a project. • How risk is to be managed 7. For the most recent year, Cal’s Cats had sales of \$380,000, cost of goods sold of \$93,000, depreciation expense of \$47,000, and additions to......

Words: 1316 - Pages: 6

...London Churchill College | BTEC Higher National Diploma (HND) in Business | Business Decision Makingby Edina TosokiTutor: Rahaman Hasan | | LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 29th of November 2013 Dear Mr. Rahaman Hasan, Enclosed is a formal report for your attention on the subject of Kellogg’s case analysis as per requested in September 2013 to analyze the market response to Kellogg’s products in the UK compared to the historical data of response in India focusing on the failed launch. This report includes introduction, literature, methodology, findings and analysis and finally a conclusion and recommendation section to make clear each step of the process. All data that we collected, organized and analyzed have been presented in charts and graphs for the better understanding, then a final presentation was produced to communicate the whole process through visualization. The workload that this formal report has been based on was assigned both to small groups as well joint class work, however this particular report mainly based on my individual input. During the whole preparation of this report I have tried to stay objective and record accurate information as to the best of my knowledge. Some sections of this report may reflect my own conclusions, suggestions and justifications relating to the subject. Thank you for your time reading, marking my report and giving the opportunity to learn and develop new skills by your guidance. Yours sincerely, Edina......

Words: 5712 - Pages: 23

#### Sma Worshop Note

...of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising in connection with the use and performance of and/or reliance of the Information. CPA PROGRAM – PROFESSIONAL LEVEL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING DELIVERING STRATEGY: THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT’S ROLE WORKSHOP NOTES 2014 AUTHORS: RICHARD COMERFORD AND PETER ROBINSON REVISED BY: BRIAN CLARKE Contents Workshop notes Workshop introduction Workshop objectives Workshop purpose Case Study: Pavlova Pty Ltd (PPL) Module 4: Techniques for creating and managing value Product costing at PPL Strategic management accounting tools and non-manufacturing activities Module 4 review questions Module 5 introduction – Project management Project selection NPV and sensitivity analysis Project planning – PERT Project implementation Project completion and review Module 5 review questions 1 2 2 3 3 8 11 20 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 32 Workshop...

Words: 12972 - Pages: 52

#### Projects

...ftoc.indd 16 10/10/08 5:17:22 PM SEVENTH EDITION PROJECT MANAGEMENT A Managerial Approach ffirs.indd 1 10/10/08 5:16:30 PM SEVENTH EDITION PROJECT MANAGEMENT A Managerial Approach Jack R. Meredith Broyhill Distinguished Scholar and Chair in Operations Wake Forest University Samuel J. Mantel, Jr. Joseph S. Stern Professor Emeritus of Operations Management University of Cincinnati John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ffirs.indd 3 10/10/08 5:16:35 PM ftoc.indd 16 10/10/08 5:17:22 PM Dedication To Avery and Mitchell, from “papajack.” J. R. M. To Maggie and Patty for their help, support, and affection. S. J. M. VICE PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE PUBLISHER  Don Fowley EXECUTIVE EDITOR  Beth Golub ASSOCIATE EDITOR  Jen Devine MARKETING MANAGER  Carly DeCandia Design Director  Harry Nolan SENIOR DESIGNER  Kevin Murphy SENIOR PRODUCTION EDITOR  Patricia McFadden SENIOR Media editor  Lauren Sapira PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES  Ingrao Associates This book was set in by GGS Book Services PMG and printed and bound by RRD/Willard. The cover was printed by RRD/Willard. This book is printed on acid free paper.  Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the......

Words: 181757 - Pages: 728

#### Project Financing

...Project Financing Asset-Based Financial Engineering Second Edition JOHN D. FINNERTY, Ph.D. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Project Financing Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons is the oldest independent publishing company in the United States. With ofﬁces in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia, Wiley is globally committed to developing and marketing print and electronic products and services for our customers’ professional and personal knowledge and understanding. The Wiley Finance series contains books written speciﬁcally for ﬁnance and investment professionals as well as sophisticated individual investors and their ﬁnancial advisors. Book topics range from portfolio management to e-commerce, risk management, ﬁnancial engineering, valuation, and ﬁnancial instrument analysis, as well as much more. For a list of available titles, visit our Web site at www.WileyFinance.com. Project Financing Asset-Based Financial Engineering Second Edition JOHN D. FINNERTY, Ph.D. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright C 2007 by John D. Finnerty. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. Wiley Bicentennial Logo: Richard J. Paciﬁco No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United......

Words: 114949 - Pages: 460

#### Project Mgt

...SEVENTH EDITION PROJECT MANAGEMENT A Managerial Approach SEVENTH EDITION PROJECT MANAGEMENT A Managerial Approach Jack R. Meredith Broyhill Distinguished Scholar and Chair in Operations Wake Forest University Samuel J. Mantel, Jr. Joseph S. Stern Professor Emeritus of Operations Management University of Cincinnati John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DeDication To Avery and Mitchell, from “papajack.” J. R. M. To Maggie and Patty for their help, support, and affection. S. J. M. VICE PRESIDENT & EXECUTIVE PUBLISHER Don Fowley EXECUTIVE EDITOR Beth Golub ASSOCIATE EDITOR Jen Devine MARKETING MANAGER Carly DeCandia DESIGN DIRECTOR Harry Nolan SENIOR DESIGNER Kevin Murphy SENIOR PRODUCTION EDITOR Patricia McFadden SENIOR MEDIA EDITOR Lauren Sapira PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES Ingrao Associates This book was set in by GGS Book Services PMG and printed and bound by RRD/Willard. The cover was printed by RRD/Willard. This book is printed on acid free paper.  Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center,......

Words: 178405 - Pages: 714