Wal-Mart de Mexico
Wal-Mart, one of the worlds largest companies, has been reported to be pushing bribes on people to get into different parts of Mexico and expand their markets. About 24 million dollars was said to be utilized to bribe Mexican city officials to redraw zoning maps, so that Wal-Mart was able build their storage warehouses and super centers in areas of high populations and even in locations of historic importance. People like mayors, members of the zoning boards, and governors were all bribed into these plans of international expansion. In the Wal-Mart de Mexico case, CEO Lee Scott is faced with the three options of how to handle the bribery of building of record locations throughout Mexico. He needs to decide whether he should ignore the problem, “quietly neutralize the problem”, or make the results of the investigation public.

The following is a list of the stakeholders involved in this case (in no apparent order):
The communities of the places the new facilities were built – These people lost business of their Mom and Pop stores making many people suffer and lose jobs. While being bribed to give up locations and being manipulated into potential poverty.
The customers of Wal-Mart in Mexico - The consumers who are treated as though they are being thought of, by lower prices, and marketing schemes that seem more appealing towards them, all the while being teased.
Wal-Mart as a company – Not only has the company lost much business because of this brutal wrongdoing, but reputation, which in a company is most cherished. Wal-Mart will never be looked at in the same eyes as before.
Competitors – Other companies such as Target and maybe even Kmart have benefited from the bribery committed by a company who, many may say is there largest competitors.

Conferring to all of the ethical theories, Wal-Mart was wrong to decide to issue these bribes.