Free Essay

War Crimes and the International Community

In: Business and Management

Submitted By AbhishekGandhi
Words 3270
Pages 14
Running head: War Crimes and the International Community

War Crimes and the
International Community

Abhishek Gandhi
Professor Farber
Sociology 300
Summer 2012
Abstract

What are war crimes? Inhuman acts have been committed in all wars throughout human history. It has only been in the last 2 centuries that certain acts that were committed during war were found to be so reprehensible that they were labeled war crimes. Even thought these acts were committed during the "fog of war", they still merited punishment in a court of law in the eyes of the international community. When military and political leaders began to systematically target large civilian groups because of their nationality, ethnicity, gender or religion, then the international community began to see the necessity of holding political leaders accountable for their political decisions in a court of law, (Hauss, 2003). After World War II, when the atrocities of the Holocaust became well known, the victorious Allied powers decided to hold war crimes tribunals to punish the political and military leaders of Germany and Japan. The Nuremberg and Tokyo trials were the first of their kind in establishing international precedent for the prosecution of war crimes. Later war crimes that were committed in Yugoslavia and Rwanda resulted in the creation of separate tribunals by the United Nations to punish the leaders who perpetrated these acts. Attempts are being made to set up an International Criminal Court, but several powerful countries, including the United States, have refused to support its establishment.

Introduction

The history of war crimes tribunals only begins after World War II, when the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals were established. The Allied powers of World War I attempted to prosecute war crimes committed by the Axis powers, but no prosecutions by an international tribunal ever took place. A commission established after World War I in 1919 by the victorious powers sought the prosecution of enemy nationals, even leaders, guilty of offences against "the laws and customs of war or the laws of humanity," (Cassette, 2000). At the end of the war, both the Treaty of Sèvres (between the Allied powers and Turkey) and the Treaty of Versailles (the Allied powers and Germany) provided for the prosecution of central power war criminals (i.e. Turkish and German), including Kaiser Wilhelm II, before international tribunals. Although the idea of prosecutions by an international tribunal gained hold, no such prosecutions actually ever occurred. Kaiser Wilhelm was given sanctuary in the Netherlands, and only a few prosecutions of German war criminals by the German Supreme Court took place.
War Crimes and the International Community After World War II, the total defeat of the Axis powers created a historic opportunity for the establishment of the first international body for the prosecution of war criminals. Shocked by the extent and horrors of the atrocities committed by the Nazis and the Japanese and empowered by their status as victor nations, the Allies signed an agreement creating the International Military Tribunal (IMT) for the prosecution of major war criminals of the European Axis. This was soon followed in Japan by the establishment of a tribunal for the prosecution of high-ranking Japanese accused of war crimes. These tribunals were given the authority by the Allied powers to prosecute German and Japanese leaders for "crimes against the peace" (the crime of waging an aggressive war), "crimes against humanity" and "war crimes" (of which the existence was debatable in international law at the time), (Beasley, 2009). The tribunals were not concerned with the prosecution of each and every enemy national responsible for committing war crimes, but only the major players — people responsible for planning and instigating aggressive war and atrocities committed during the war. Although they adhered to certain minimum basic principles of justice, they were subsequently criticized for failing to live up to prevailing standards of criminal justice. For example, rather than being international tribunals, they were attacked for being ‘victors’ tribunals’ — examples of a few victorious states getting together and collectively exercising their powers and jurisdiction. Importantly, the tribunals were restricted to the prosecution of war criminals belonging to or representing the enemy powers for crimes committed by them during the war. They had no authority to prosecute war crimes committed by any members of the Allied forces. For these reasons, they were criticized as constituting little more than ‘victors’ justice’. This was particularly the case with the Tokyo tribunal. Many criticized the hypocrisy of prosecuting Japanese leaders for war crimes, when the Americans were guilty of the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In 1945, at the time of the establishment of the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, there was very little precedent or law providing for the criminalization of war crimes or the act of waging aggressive war. The whole concept of ‘crimes against humanity’ was largely unknown. Though international law at the time had outlawed aggressive war to an extent and did attempt to regulate conduct during war (Dyer, 2009), none of these treaties doing so made provision for the criminal prosecution and punishment of individuals guilty of breaches. The Nuremberg and Tokyo charters were effectively the first international instruments to do so. Although the Hague conventions and the early Geneva conventions outlawed certain conduct during war, they did not specifically criminalize such conduct or provide for criminal prosecutions and punishment, (Dyer, 2009). Prior to the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals there was also very little precedent for the idea of crimes against humanity — crimes which, because of their enormity, are not only crimes against the specific societies where they were perpetrated, but crimes against the whole international community, (Cassette, 2000). Their inclusion in the Nuremberg and Tokyo charters was therefore an innovation. Although much criticized, the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals were of fundamental importance to the development of international criminal law. In particular, they played a significant role in entrenching the concept of individual criminal responsibility in international law. For the first time in modern history, people (in particular high-ranking leaders) were held accountable for their actions during war, (Cassette, 2000). In so doing, these tribunals entrenched the idea that individuals, even leaders of state, could individually be held criminally responsible under international law for their actions. No longer was international law simply concerned with the actions of states, but it was now paying attention to the acts of individuals and was prepared to hold them accountable for their acts. As a result of the Nuremberg and Tokyo precedents, several treaties or laws expressly providing for the prosecution of persons guilty of committing ‘international’ crimes, including war crimes, were adopted in subsequent decades. The first such treaty was the Genocide Convention of 1948, (Dyer, 2009). The concept of genocide — the extermination or intended extermination of a whole population (the worst form of crime against humanity) — was a new legal concept conceived in response to Nazi German atrocities. The Convention provides that signatory states have an obligation to punish offenders. Offenders are supposed to be tried either by the state where the crime of genocide was committed, or by an international criminal court established to prosecute genocide. Although a draft statute for an international criminal court was produced in 1951, due to political reasons no such international court was ever established, (Cassette, 2000). The Genocide Convention was followed by the Geneva conventions of 1949. These conventions categorize certain serious war crimes as grave breaches, and place an obligation on states parties to criminalize and provide for the prosecution of such grave breaches. States parties have an obligation, in terms of these conventions, to prosecute and punish grave breaches committed not only by their own nationals, but also those committed by the nationals of any other state party. They were thus the first treaties to invoke what is known as ‘universal jurisdiction’ or international jurisdiction — jurisdiction in terms of which all states have the authority to prosecute certain crimes, regardless of whether they were committed on their own territory or by their own nationals, (Dyer, 2009). Following the charters and judgments of the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, crimes against humanity became well and truly entrenched in international law. In accordance with the judgments of these tribunals (and later international law instruments), crimes against humanity are now commonly accepted as giving rise to universal or international jurisdiction. The convention made provision for prosecution either by a signatory state in its own domestic courts, or by an international penal tribunal. Finally, the Geneva protocols were adopted in 1977. They extend protection to victims of non-international armed conflicts, and provide for universal jurisdiction over grave breaches committed in internal armed conflicts, (Budge, 2009). Thus, by 1977, the notion of international crimes over which any state has jurisdiction and the authority to prosecute, either in its own domestic courts, or under the auspices of an international tribunal, was clearly established. While the concept of international criminal law and the authority of states to prosecute war crimes had undergone substantial development since the end of World War II, there were still very few actual prosecutions. A few states, including Israel, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and Australia, adopted municipal legislation, which empowers their courts to prosecute and punish war crimes, even if committed outside of their territory. A few prosecutions have taken place as a consequence of this legislation. Perhaps the most famous and controversial post-World War II national prosecution of a war criminal in terms of such legislation, was the Eichmann trial, (Chambers, 2000). Eichmann, who had been the administrator in charge of the extermination of hundreds of thousands of Jews in Europe, was charged and convicted in the 1960s by the Israeli government for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity committed during World War II. Meanwhile, attempts to establish an international criminal court, which had begun in 1951, were suspended, largely as a result of the Cold War. States were unwilling to relinquish jealously guarded state sovereignty to an international court. Although an international framework of laws for criminalizing war crimes was being shaped, there was no mechanism to enforce them. It took the end of the Cold War and the power of the international media to galvanize the international community into further action. In 1993, after widespread international media coverage of the atrocities committed in the war in the former Yugoslavia, the UN Security Council established the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Soon, in the aftermath of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was also established by the Security Council. These tribunals differ from the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals in a number of important respects. They were not instituted by individual states through an international treaty or charter. Instead, they were established by the UN Security Council in accordance with binding Security Council resolutions. They were thus established by means of a collective decision of an international organization. In this sense, they constitute the first real ‘international criminal tribunals’ ever. At the time when the ICTY was established, the war was still raging in the former Yugoslavia. It was hoped by those who promoted the establishment of the ICTY that by bringing to justice war criminals responsible for perpetrating the policies of ethnic cleansing which characterized the war; the continuing violence in the former Yugoslavia would be diffused — enabling the negotiation of peace. In the context of Rwanda, it was hoped that the prosecution of those responsible for planning and implementing the 1994 genocide would help to prevent the outbreak of future cycles of violence, (Hauss, 2003). As long as the perpetrators of the genocide remained free and unpunished, a climate of fear, hatred and the desire for revenge would continue, ultimately resulting in further violence as people took the law into their own hands. These two international criminal tribunals were therefore largely established to promote peacemaking and peace building: peacemaking in the context of the former Yugoslavia, in that the establishment of the ICTY was an attempt to bring or restore peace; and peace building in the context of Rwanda, in that the establishment of the ICTR was an attempt to consolidate and build upon a fragile peace (achieved after the victory by the Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front). Like the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals, both the ICTY and the ICTR only have limited jurisdiction to prosecute very specific crimes. The ICTY has jurisdiction over all "serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991" — including genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The ICTR has jurisdiction over "serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 1994" — including genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. For this reason, both these UN war crimes tribunals are known as ad hoc tribunals. They do not have generalized powers to prosecute all war crimes in any situation or context. Because they were established by the Security Council as measures to establish and maintain peace, they can be dissolved by the Security Council at any stage when it determines that they are no longer necessary for the maintenance of peace in their respective regions. They therefore have limited powers and a limited lifespan, (Cassette, 2000). The ad hoc nature of the tribunals has exposed them to severe criticism. Many have questioned why the international community saw fit to go to the expense and trouble of prosecuting violations committed in these contexts, but not in many other instances of gross violations of humanitarian law. Such selective enforcement of international law and justice is unfair both to surviving victims and to perpetrators. While these criticisms are valid, it would be hard to deny that the establishment of special tribunals to deal with specific atrocities committed in these two contexts was better than the international community once again ignoring widespread atrocities. Initially, both tribunals (the Rwanda tribunal, in particular) struggled to establish themselves. They were hampered by a lack of resources, infrastructure and state co-operation. This severely impacted upon their effectiveness. Although both tribunals began to issue indictments reasonably quickly, it took a long time before they were able to get custody over a sizeable number of those accused. It is not up to the tribunals to secure the arrest of high-level accused. They do not have the mechanism or powers to secure arrests themselves. Rather, it is up to individual states and assisting forces to do so. The situation has improved with both tribunals having a number of accused in custody, including several high-level accused. Several convictions have also been made. They are therefore both fully functional judicial institutions. It is therefore fair to say that, notwithstanding their shortcomings, much has been achieved by these ad hoc tribunals. While some may debate their contribution to peace, there is no doubt that they have established the beginnings of a proper international criminal justice enforcement system. Not only has substantive and procedural international criminal law been significantly advanced and developed by them, but they have proved that international criminal prosecutions are viable and practical. Since their establishment, it has become increasingly difficult for people accused of gross human rights violations to escape with impunity. It is also ultimately because of the work of the ad hoc tribunals that the creation of a permanent international criminal court has become a greater possibility. In July 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was adopted. After decades of debate over the issue, this statute finally makes provision for the establishment of a permanent international criminal court. If and when it comes into force, the International Criminal Court will be a permanent international institution, which will have powers to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. This court will effectively have jurisdiction to prosecute war crimes committed in states or by nationals of states signatory to the statute. It will thus not be limited to a particular situation or territory, although the extent of its jurisdiction will obviously depend upon the number of states which become party to the statute. Whereas the ad hoc tribunals exercise primacy over relevant domestic prosecutions in any state, the court will only be entitled to exercise jurisdiction where the relevant national state is either unwilling to or unable to prosecute. It is therefore not intended to replace national judicial processes, but rather to complement them. In accordance with the statute, all states parties will have an obligation to co-operate with the court, including arresting indicted persons. This is similar to the obligations that all states have in terms of the ICTY and ICTR. However, the difference is that this obligation is not imposed by the Security Council, but is simply a treaty obligation. Any duty to co-operate and arrest is also not imposed in terms of the UN Charter. It is limited to states parties and is not in itself enforceable by the Security Council. As with the ICTY and ICTR, because there is no permanent international police force, the enforcement of the orders of the permanent criminal court will largely depend upon individual state co-operation. The effectiveness of the court will therefore once again depend upon political will.
Conclusion
Developments in international law subsequent to World War II have clearly established the concept of international criminal jurisdiction — whereby certain crimes are recognized as being international crimes, giving rise to international individual criminal responsibility. All states are authorized and arguably obliged in certain circumstances to provide for the prosecution of such crimes — either by their own domestic courts, or through the establishment and participation in international criminal tribunals. This international criminal jurisdiction has resulted in the establishment of the two ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, and has finally crystallized into the potential establishment of a permanent international criminal court, which will have wide-ranging powers to indict and prosecute international war criminals. As the precedents of the tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda show, the effectiveness of an international criminal court depends upon state co-operation, both at the investigation stage and in effecting arrests. The growing momentum of these ad hoc tribunals, however, suggests an increasing commitment among the international community to implement international justice. The recent establishment of a special court for Sierra Leone supports this observation, and augurs well for the prospect of a permanent international criminal court indeed becoming a reality.

References
Beasley, David (2009). Background: War Crimes Tribunals in History. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Radio Free Asia. Website: www.rfa.org/english/news/cambodia/war-crime.html

Budge, Kent G. (2009). Geneva and Hague Conventions. Retrieved 7/31/09 from The Pacific War Online Encyclopedia. Website: pwencycl.kgbudge.com/G/e/Geneva_and_Hague_Conventions.htm

Cassette, Jacquie (2000). Towards Justice in the Wake of Armed Conflicts? The Evolution of War Crimes Tribunals. African Security Review vol. 9 no 5/6.

Chambers, John Whiteclay II (2000). War Crimes. Retrieved 7/31/09 from The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Website: www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O126-WarCrimes.html

Cornish, Paul (2009). Geneva and Hague Conventions. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Military History Companion. Website: www.answers.com/topic/geneva-and-hague- conventions

Dyer, Peter. A History of War Crimes. Retrieved 7/31/09 from RINF News. Website: rinf.com/alt-news/contributions/a-history-of-war-crimes/5324/

Hauss, Charles (Chip), (2003). War Crimes. Retrieved 7/31/09 from Beyond Intractability.org. Website: www.beyondintractability.org/essay/war_crimes_general/

Kafala, Tarik. What is a War Crime? Retrieved 7/31/09 from BBC News. Website: newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1420133. stm

Similar Documents

Free Essay

International Humanitarian Law

...or threats to commit them - whose primary purpose is to spread terror are prohibited * objects indispensable to the survival of communities must not be destroyed Strengthen the obligation to provide civilians with food, water and other essentials. Those who are not, or no longer, taking part in an armed conflict must be protected, respected and treated humanely. The Additional Protocols say that: * All wounded and sick people, both civilian and military, must be collected and cared for, without discrimination. * Women and children must be respected and protected from any form of indecent assault. * Children and adolescents must be protected from the effects of war. They must not be allowed to take part in hostilities. * Members of families separated by conflict should be reunited and they should be able to exchange personal messages. They also have the right to be informed of what has happened to missing relatives. The Additional Protocols say that: * Suffering inflicted on an opponent must not go beyond what is necessary to achieve a legitimate military objective. * Combatants no longer capable of fighting may not be attacked. * In an international conflict, captured combatants must be presumed to be prisoners of war, and are therefore entitled to protection under the Geneva Conventions. * Prisoners of war who cannot be cared for must be set free              Subsequently; Article 51 and 54 states Outlaw indiscriminate attack on......

Words: 960 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Contemporary Perspectives

...This essay will first attempt to define globalisation and define neo-liberalism. There is a close interconnection between the two concepts, especially on an international level therefore their positive and negative impacts on crime and criminal justice will be discussed together and then a separate analysis of neo-liberalism and its effects on crime will be examined from a local perspective. Globalisation defined Globalisation is not static, but is rather a dynamic process which involves the growing interconnectedness of states and societies that enmesh human communities with each other, easy mobility of goods and services across countries, electronic communications transcending borders and creating independence from territorially confined units of political power (Massari 2003). These key tenets, which encompass the definition of globalisation, will be discussed with regard to their impacts on crime. Neo-liberalism defined Neo-liberalism can be defined as a set of political beliefs which include the idea that the role of the state in crime control should be minimal as the only legitimate purpose of the state is to protect the individual (O’Malley 2008). Neo-liberalism generally includes the belief that the most efficient way to organise all exchanges of goods and services in human society is through freely adopted market mechanisms leading to greater cost effectiveness, individual liberty and moral virtue (Thorsen & Lie 2000). Individuals in society are......

Words: 3026 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Asdasdasd

...Chapter 3: The International Criminal Court By: Robel Tesfai History: The International Criminal Court and Darfur On July 1st 2002, the International Criminal Court was created by the implementation of a Roman Statute. As of May 2013, the ICC had 122 state parties to the Statute of the Court. This large number of states included all of South America, most of Oceania, about 50% of Africa, and almost all of Europe. A paper published by the Political Science Department of Columbia University describes the statute as having the following obligations and limitations: “The statute empowers the Court to exercise jurisdiction with respect to these crimes under three conditions: 1) where a State Party refers a situation to the Prosecutor, 2) where the Prosecutor initiates an investigation proprio motu, and 3) where the UN Security Council refers a situation to the Court. Under the first two conditions, the Court may exercise. 25 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Part 2. Jurisdiction only over nationals of a State Party or over crimes alleged to have occurred on the territory of a State Party; however, where the Security Council has referred a situation, the Court may exercise jurisdiction over any individual alleged to have perpetrated a crime within its competence, regardless of the nationality of the person or the location of the crime” (Broache, 11). On March 31, 2005, the UN Security Council passed the referral of the situation to the ICC with a......

Words: 1837 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Terrorism and Genocide in 21st Centuary

...WAR CRIME AND GENOCIDE A war crime refers to the serious violation of the laws and customs of war (also known as international humanitarian law) giving rise to individual criminal responsibility. It also includes grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict and in conflicts "not of an international character" listed in the Rome Statute, when they are committed as part of a plan or policy or on a large scale. These prohibited acts include: * murder; * mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; * taking of hostages; * intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population; * intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historical monuments or hospitals; * pillaging; * rape, sexual slavery, forced pregnancy or any other form of sexual violence; * conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 years into armed forces or groups or using them to participate actively in hostilities.  The use of chemical and biological weapons in warfare are also prohibited by numerous chemical arms control agreements and the Biological Weapons Convention. Wearing enemy uniforms or civilian clothes to infiltrate enemy lines for espionage or sabotage missions is a legitimate ruse of war, though fighting in combat or assassinating individuals, even if they are military targets, behind......

Words: 1926 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Global Crime Analysis

...Global Crimes Analysis University of Phoenix Cynthia Butler CJA/394 April 16, 2012 This paper will identify the various major global crimes and criminal issues that affect national and international criminal justice systems and processes. In addition, there will be a comparison and contrast of the different criminal justice systems and how they have addressed major global crimes and criminal issues. Global crime is an issue that threatens the safety and security of people all over the world. Global crime can be international drug smuggling operations, human trafficking, or international prostitution rings. Weapons trading are also a problem that exists all over the world. There are always concerns of rogue nations selling nuclear weapons to other nations that do not follow the guidelines of the world community. In the international community, human trafficking has become an issue that is spiraling out of control. The "International Trafficking" (2010) website cites that victims of this crime are usually trafficked both within the countries borders and inside other countries borders. Human trafficking happens in different ways, sex trafficking occurs all over the world, while Burma traffics children to be soldiers. The trafficking crimes are not contained to other countries as Florida has been known to have forced labor practices within the citrus fields. Lucas (2011) addresses the difficulties in securing weapons caches that can......

Words: 1150 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Vicgimology

...are legally binding. Tribunals maybe put together for a number of reasons and proceedings can be open or closed. By the end of the 20th century it was clear that the tribunal structure was a likely candidate for reform given the number of different tribunals, all operating under different procedures and government. A classic reason to convene a tribunal is where the international community wants to hold hearings pertaining to genocide, acts of war or any other event. These hearings are held on a international level to avoid accusations of manipulation or favoritism. Tribunals came under scrutiny in 1957 with the Franks Committee. The committee claimed tribunals were “cheapness, accessibility, freedom form technicality, expedition and expert knowledge of their particular subject” (lawobserver.com). The franks report led to the Tribunals and Inquiries Act of 1958 which has now been replaced by the Tribunals and Inquiries Act of 1992. Under these acts the Council on Tribunals came into being and was given the role of supervising Tribunals. The reasons tribunals are important between countries are, let’s say; War took place in Britain, a tribunal formed/convened in Britain they maybe accused of leaning towards the British side when the hearings start. An independent tribunal would judge the situation without bias. Tribunals are...

Words: 1000 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Writer

...Global Community Failure to Eradicate Genocide Name: Course: Tutor: Date: Abstract When it comes to global criminology, the subject is fatal in the sense of reprisals accustomed to it. In any case, international criminal activities are largely based geopolitical factors rather than the genuine purpose of ending human to human barbarism. This paper will attempt to prove that ‘global community’ commitment to end genocide events is categorically challenged by lack of sufficient devotion to ‘the pledge’ to eradicate the vice. The paper is structured into three main parts and one secondary part. The background will attempt to examine the scholarly effort attempting to relate the basis of global community pledge and the general act of genocide. A further sub category of this part will introduce the role played by United Nations in minimizing genocide. The second section will be substantial in analyzing past genocide events; courtesy of three relevant examples, Cambodia, Sri Lanka and Rwanda. In this section, the document will examine the various roles played by United Nations in fueling the genocide. The third section will examine 21 century events, and how United Nations has chosen a back player in preventing the occurrences of these genocides. The secondary section will attempt to examine the role played by International Criminal Court and how it has been challenged in limiting genocide events. Background Research has attempted relate the end of the holocaust and the......

Words: 3536 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Slobodan Milosevic

...1997 to 2000. He was charged by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, or the ICTY, on the basis of both individual and superior criminal responsibility with genocide, crimes against humanity, violations of the laws or customs of war and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. These crimes were allegedly committed in Kosovo, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia during the war in former Yugoslavia. On September 26, 2002, the trial of Slobodan Milosevic before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia was put into affect.   Milosevic began his journey to the Hague as a legal matter when, on May 24, 1999, the first of three indictments against him were handed down.  The indictment, referred to as the Kosovo Indictment, charged Milosevic with the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity for his role in the expulsion of more than eight hundred thousand ethnic Albanians from Kosovo, as well as the deaths of nine hundred others from 1998 to 1999.   Milosevic's indictment was considered both legally and politically significant because it was the first indictment to be issued by an international court against a current head of state. In September 2000, Milosevic was voted out of office and relinquished his position as President of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.  He was subsequently surrendered to the court on June 28, 2001 by Yugoslavian authorities after being given an international arrest warrant, and, although his......

Words: 684 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Gender and Transitional Justice: Contribution of Transitional Justice Mechanisms in Addressing Gender-Based Violence in Post-Conflict Sierra Leone

...Contribution of Transitional Justice Mechanisms in Addressing Gender-Based Violence in post-Conflict Sierra Leone Introduction Sierra Leone, a relatively small country with a population of just over 6 million people, has been the focus of considerable attention due to the recent Ebola epidemic and, prior to that, the decade-long civil war (1991-2002) (Mills, Nesbitt-Ahmed, Diggins & Mackieu, 2015, p. 4). After the war, the transition from civil war to peace witnessed a number of landmark procedural innovations with widespread implications for gender justice. The decade-long conflict had shattered the West African country, displacing more than one million people and leaving more than two hundred thousand women and girls dealing with the aftermath of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV). Then, in 1999, the Lomé Peace Agreement traded amnesty for peace, making provision for the creation of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Sierra Leone to work parallel to the Special Court of Sierra Leone (otherwise called the Special Court or the SCSL) in order to prosecute those who bore “the greatest responsibility” for mass atrocities committed during the civil war. While there is a growing consensus that truth and reconciliation commissions as a transitional justice mechanism can be effective tools “in the construction of a post-conflict society that is more democratic and more respectful of human rights” (Wielbelhans-Hrahm, 2010, p. 3), it is also true that integrating......

Words: 6180 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Sold in War

...“SOLD IN WAR: Women Trafficking and Armed Conflicts Introduction: A universal attribute of any society, tribe, or nation is its capacity and obvious willingness to wage wars. Whether or not to vanquish, to colonize, to protect, to develop, or to with ease set up a symbolic superiority, a nation’s use of military actions performs an primary function within the definition of that nation’s identification. Whatever the marketed purpose of a war, nonetheless, it is finally a social occasion that regularly allows for the dying and suffering of each warring parties and civilians and for the exploitation of thousands of men and women, children and adults on a grand scale. The chaos and turmoil of wartime seems to carry out the worst qualities in human beings. In an article published in the University of St. Thomas Law Journal it highlights that a major tenet of the laws of war is that “civilians, and women and children in particular, are to be protected from the trials and suffering of war to the fullest extent possible”. Therefore, it is ultimately the task of each military and its members to make sure their behaviors are consistent with the specifications in International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Even though the complete avoidance of civilian deaths and suffering is not realistic, it is the responsibility of an armed force to not intentionally target civilians and to consider operations in terms of the concepts of distinction, military necessity and proportionality. By their very......

Words: 6761 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Ruf Sierra Leone

...until the RUF invasion, the group was relatively unknown. The increase in RUF activity was largely due to both the fight for control of Sierra Leone’s mineral resources (a dominant factor driving the RUF for most of the war), and the impact of external influences, especially the spread of the Liberian civil war into Sierra Leone. The military strength of the RUF was increased by considerable support from the NPFL, formed by Charles Taylor, one of the warring factions in the Liberian civil war, Burkinabè mercenaries, and the provision of military training to RUF fighters from Libya. Liberia, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire and Libya reportedly also provided the RUF with military equipment. Much of the RUF’s original ideology was lost among RUF fighters themselves, since a large proportion were in fact Liberian rebels fighting for their own cause. Moreover, any initial popular support that the group had enjoyed in the past was undermined by its use of intimidation and terror tactics. The RUF carried out massive forced recruitment and numbered over 24,000 by 1999. A large number of RUF officers were under 18 and most of the higher ranking officers shared very little of the group’s initial ideology. For most of the war the RUF’s leadership was personalized in its founder, Foday Sankoh, who controlled all RUF policies...

Words: 4057 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Gobilization and Terrorism

...started to hit on the headlines of the international communities. Today the international community has shifted its energy and concern on the security issues and geopolitics. Before this incidence, the world was moving steadily to realize the idea of globalization. Where in the world would turn out to be a village. Globalization has been celebrated by everyone across the continent thanks to the technological process available. Globalization was celebrated by all including the population at large for bringing social and economic homogenization including other benefits (Chenoweth 355-378). Terrorism has now become the global issue dominating all squares of life of each individual while globalization has been labeled a global process. Globalization of terrorism does not only mean the way terrorists work across the borders but also how globalization process has facilitated this process of terrorism (Kudryavtsev, et al 84-94). Like industrialization, people across the borders have to live according to globalization to save their future as most of people call it undeniable truth in life. As the process of globalization gains speed, the more terrorists are able to communicate, move, transact finances and gather intelligence information with speed. All these works by the terrorists would not be so efficient if it were not for globalization. Due to globalization, terrorism does not go alone nowadays, but it has become a combination of crime and corruption. Most people are......

Words: 3001 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

World War 2

...WW1 in 1918. The German Empire was in name only, having lost its overseas territories as a result of the First World War, whereas the Japanese Empire was in fact one since it had been steadily growing in size (as a result of actions before, during, and after the First World War, and during the 1930s through the various invasions of China). However, German did have colonies in China and at the end of the war these were formally handed over to Japan.  The German Reich, in its Weimar Republic format, had reconciled with its European neighbors and had rejoined the international community. Under its Nazi Germany format, it exited the international community and started to rise tensions, before invading its neighbors. Likewise, Japan had been part of the international community before raising tensions and causing wars. Differences: German sought revenge for what happened to them after World War 1, while Japanese sought imperial might and resource. Germans blamed their problems on Jews, Japanese were in a way, forced to take resources because of USA. German armies comprised of people of German decent from all around the world, whereas Japanese recruited direct from home SIMILARITIES: The Aryan race was thought to be superior to all else. The Japanese believed to be superior. The German committed war crime against the Jews and the Japanese committed war crime against Chinese. Both were axis aligned. Both...

Words: 311 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Global Crime Analysis Paper

...Global Crime Analysis Paper Jessica Cross CJA/394 October 20, 2013 Global crimes transcend national borders and threaten American citizens and communities, businesses, and institutions, as well as global security and stability. The classification of global crimes can be categorized according to if the behavior is international and constitutes a crime against the world, or if the act is transnational that affects the interests of more than one state (Global Solutions, n.d.). The contents of this essay will identify the various major global crimes and criminal issues that have a global impact on national and international justice systems and processes. In addition, the text will discuss the various international justice systems and how these global crimes and criminal issues are addressed. Fueled by open borders, global markets, and the advancement of telecommunications, international crime has become a rising universal problem. In 1995, President Clinton classified international crime as a danger to the national interest of the United States. Therefore, before and since then the federal government has been busy in a converging effort to address various major global crimes, such as human rights and war crimes, organized crime and narcotics, cybercrime, environmental crime, and terrorism (Global Solutions, n.d.). Human Rights and War Crimes are inhuman acts committed by an extensive or systematic attack aimed against individuals, such as genocide, crimes......

Words: 1391 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Case for Bashar Assad to Be Tried as a War Criminal

...Research Paper May 3, 2015 Introduction The Syrian Civil War has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. Since 2011, protests and attacks have been a daily occurrence, and the regime of Bashar Al-Assad has done what it believed was necessary to stop rebel forces and end protests. As such, Assad has committed many questionable, at best, and criminal, at worst, actions against the civilians of Syria in an effort to stop the rebels. The indiscriminate warfare Assad has used against Syrian citizens is shown in multiple international doctrines as illegal, and is thus a war crime, which should be prosecuted. The Statue of the International Criminal Court defines war crimes as “serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict” and “serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in an armed conflict not of an international character (ICRC 2016). Section IV of Rule 156 of the International Committee of the Red Cross, titled Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed During a Non-International Armed Conflict, lists use of prohibited weapons subject to criminal sanctions, and specifically references the Chemical Weapons Convention, Amended Protocol II to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, and the Ottawa Convention as laying the groundwork for this guideline. This paper will address historical context of the Syrian Civil War, United Nations documents concerning indiscriminate......

Words: 2422 - Pages: 10