...Andrew Jackson should be on the twenty dollar bill. As the seventh president of the United States of America, he accomplished a lot in his life. He brought the focus of the government back to the people. Growing up, Jackson lived recklessly. Though he got into trouble quite a bit, he had the motivation to turn his life around, even after a rough childhood. He was lowly educated yet was driven to become a lawyer. Andrew Jackson was the kind of guy who was stubborn, he always wanted to prove himself and his worthy. People have been known to talk about his remarkable character. While serving as a Major General in the national army, he valued each and every soldiers life. He was always putting his soldiers' health before his own. Andrew Jackson...
Words: 336 - Pages: 2
...Melisa Smith 10|31|13 Block 3 How Democratic Was Andrew Jackson? Andrew Jackson was one of the most popular presidents but he was also controversial. As a young man Andrew Jackson fought in the American Revolution. He served two terms in office as president from 1828 through 1832. Although he was a democratic president he showed more dictatorship. How democratic was Andrew Jackson? A democratic government is governed by the people. Andrew Jackson promoted democratic government and democratic policies but his Native American policies were very undemocratic. Andrew Jackson’s government policies were democratic because they increased the power of many people. Jackson’s victory sped up the transfer of power from the country house, to the farm house, from the east to the west, and from snobs to the mobs. According to presidential election statistics from 1816 through 1836, it states that elected presidents are chosen more by the people in 1836 compared to 1816. This evidence helps explain that Andrew Jackson’s political policy was democratic because; when he was selected president, he was selected more by the popular vote rather than the legislative vote and electors. Andrew Jackson’s economic policies were democratic because they increased Americans’ access to money. He sent a bank veto message to congress. He did not like the bank because he felt like the rich and powerful too often bent the acts of government for their own selfish purposes. He also did not agree with the foreigners...
Words: 487 - Pages: 2
...Hofstadter analyzes Andrew Jackson’s career as well as his concept of “Jacksonian Democracy.” After reading this chapter I was able to find the similarities and differences between the two principles of “Jacksonian Democracy” and “Jeffersonian Democracy.” Jacksonian Democracy and Jeffersonian Democracy are very similar in most aspects. As the Presidents of the United States they both had the same goals and views. They both were in favor for the common people in the society and believed that it was those who should have the most influence in government, and not the rich. They both believed in the “common men” which did not include minorities like Blacks and Native Americans. Each created their own democracy that helped influence the...
Words: 558 - Pages: 3
...Andrew Jackson: Is he worthy? Do you think the man on the twenty dollar bill deserves to be on there? Do you know who he is? Well I’m here to explain it all. The man on the twenty dollar bill is Andrew Jackson. He is our 7th president, a very crucial on at that. He was a strong believer in the common man, challenged the national bank and caused the worst economic failure, and won in a past-due battle that cost thousands of lives for no reason. So clearly he is not worthy of being honored on the twenty dollar bill. For one, Jackson condoned the Indian removal act. For two, when the Supreme Court said the Cherokee could stay, Jackson rebelled and continued with the plan. This shows that his loyalty remained else-where. Andrew Jackson does not...
Words: 468 - Pages: 2
...Andrew Jackson was the champion of the common men. He was a headstrong democrat. Meaning he believed in more power within the states and a smaller national government. Jackson served as president from March 4, 1829 – March 4, 1837. During this time, he vetoed the United States Bank that only benefited the rich. He also gave the people more of a say in voting for the president. Andrew Jackson was a common man and gave the people like him the power they deserve. Andrew Jackson gave the power back to the people. It started when he vetoed the United States Bank. The bank benefited from the rich eastern depositors. Even when it was at the expense of the farmers, the workers, and the state banks. In Andrew Jackson’s Bank Veto Message to Congress, Jackson stated that “...The present Bank of the United States...enjoys an exclusive privilege of banking...it is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purpose.” The bank was biased toward business owners interests...
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
...to the early 1800's standards, President Andrew Jackson did not demonstrate democracy on numerous occasions. He violated the Constitution by overriding the Supreme Court's decision to let Indians remain untouched in their land, and kicked the Indian tribes out of Georgia and sent them on the notorious Trail of Tears (Doc 8). Jackson again failed to practice democracy when he assigned his supporters as the nation's leaders, even though some of them were thieves and hurt the people. He was being nondemocratic and was not thinking of everyone beyond the common white man. Although some would argue that Andrew Jackson was democratic when he paid special attention to the poor, he failed to make both the powerful and the common people...
Words: 464 - Pages: 2
...In the old days democratic is different from day. To really to answer “How democratic was Andrew Jackson?”. You need to focus on what time period was and what was going on this period. In the 1820 and 1830 the people were the white man. A democratic is government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system. Jackson was an orphan. He was a rebellious child and never steps away of what he wanted. He raises himself without anyone to help him. He wanted to change the way the country had been run before he took charge. He didn't think that the people were really getting their fair say on things. So, He began his study of the law but he was born to be a hero. He enters to the military until he became the commanded America forces in defense of New Orleans. Then he instantly became a national hero because of New Oreland battle. Jackson won Americans hearts not just because he wins battles, but he relate to the common man. He was not a very wealthy man; he owned a home and some land. Jackson did not believe the Constitution gives equal opportunity to the Americans. Andrew Jackson was democratic...
Words: 947 - Pages: 4
...life during the 1830’s, the time was full of enormous parades that were bedazzled with portraits of political leaders. It can only be inferred that the whole purpose of it was to help promote that leaders image and get the people to recognize it more so that if the time presented itself the people would vote or lean towards that leader’s perspectives and or campaign. I think that siding with Mary P. Ryan’s Antebellum Politics as Raucous Democracy would be most beneficial because it is the one essay that sounds mostly what is our democracy is like today. The idea of a democracy is where a system of government is ran by the whole population or all the...
Words: 896 - Pages: 4
...Tejanos were the Spanish inhabitants that lived in Texas and Anglo-Americans was a name given to the Americans who settled down to Mexican owned Texas Stephan F. Austin a Tejano help grant many of the Anglo-Americans entry into Texas; however; many have entered Texas illegally and faced many opposition such as the Native Americans and the Spanish living in Texas and therefore lead to the Americanization of Texas. The Anglo-Americans adapted to the indigenous Native American population and the Tejanos living in Texas by being opportunistic and resourceful. The Anglo-Americans were very opportunistic to adapt, as they were able to gain from their selfish ways. Sam Houston was sent to Texas by Andrew Jackson to help redeem his life after the...
Words: 566 - Pages: 3
...novel. His book, A People's History of the United States, paints history in a whole new light. While most teachers tell the story of the iconic Andrew Jackson and his role models, like Burren, being right in their actions, the other side is rarely looked at, as most believe their good outweighs the bad. Zinn believes that Jackson and Burren were American villains that tainted our history. He speaks of this in the seventh chapter of his book, which is also a Jackson quote, “As Long as a Grass Grows or Water Runs.” He uses other like-minded historians and historical events to support his claims. These claims are that the Indian was an obstacle...
Words: 715 - Pages: 3
...Others believe Jackson had no right to destroy the lives of so many people and acted irresponsibly. His view on Indian policy violated not only political and constitutional aspects, but also moral, and practical as well. Andrew Jackson’s decision to send the American Indians on the trail of tears, removed any type of moral standards that were in place at the time. Although some people of the time argued that they were incapable of change, Christian missionaries who worked closely with the Indians begged to differ. They saw the slow assimilation that was beginning to happen and opposed anything that would halt their efforts. Those who did not work closely with them, including Jackson, did not see any progress, and just assumed that none was being made. Another aspect of the moral failing of Jackson's decision pertains to the amount of lives lost on the journey. Those who were members of Cherokee tribes were...
Words: 485 - Pages: 2
...The Panic of 1812 was an economic disaster that occurred when small banks printed too much money causing inflation. Andrew Jackson was the president at the time and had been ruling with more power than any president before him, earning him the nickname “King Andrew.” King Andrew, once elected president, began to push many Americans against the 2nd National Bank. Instead, he wanted them to be deposited into state banks. Secretary of the Treasure Duane refused this, but was simply removed by Jackson and replaced with Roger B. Taney. Eventually, “twenty-three state banks-dubbed ‘pet banks’ by anti-Jacksonians-had been selected as depositories.” The idea was strongly opposed in all of the congress. So much so, that a new political party, called the Whig party. “This name played off the idea that Jackson was acting as if he were ‘King Andrew’ because it was the Whig party in Britain that espoused the limiting of royal power.” The Senate eventually gained control once again and stopped the election of Taney into the secretary of Treasury. Unfortunately, Jackson had already destroyed the American banking system making it unpredictable...
Words: 1075 - Pages: 5
...Constitution and of individual liberties but many times they put their rivalry with the Northeastern industry and Whig politics before these ideals. While Jacksonians correctly viewed themselves as guardians of political democracy, equal economic opportunity, and individual liberty, they were often more interested in developing these concepts rather than protecting them. Jackson was a strong opponent of the unequal and aristocrat dominated economic structure in most of America. He was very against the Bank of America because he believed it to have a monopoly on banking and felt that it was owned and run unjustly by wealthy aristocrats who were not always true Americans (B). It must also be noted however, that while the Bank of America was undoubtedly corrupt (Nicholas Biddle was known to have given sums of money to close friends, and was also known to regularly bribe newspapers and similar media.) it also did what it was supposed to do very well. It provided money and credit to many of the working classes that Jackson defended, and also was the source of much economic growth. As a result of this veto, Jackson established pet banks in many Western areas to try to appease his main group of supporters and build up the rivalry between the agrarian South and West and the industrial North (C). Many immigrants found that one of the first things they discovered upon...
Words: 1035 - Pages: 5
...The Indian Removal act was not only a symbol in American History but really devastating. The Native Americans that lived in the 1800s especially the 1830s have endured the worst things possible and we didn’t have too because of our own selfish needs. But that’s not all how and why did the Indian Removal act have caused the war and there is more to talk about. Claim The Indian Removal act was important, it was significant to American History, and led to the Civil War. Reason The Indian Removal act was significant to American History because it allows Native a Americans to own that land and keep it from harm, and it led to the Civil War because of fugitive slaves. The Indian removal act was important because it led to the eviction of over...
Words: 693 - Pages: 3
...The Trail of Tears is a phrase known to define the forceful expulsion of the five civilized Native tribes, away from their traditional lands and forced migration to new Indian ground which was west of the Mississippi River. These tribes were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and the Seminoles. When Andrew Jackson was elected president in the year 1828, the Natives soon became a part of the next racial targeting. President Andrew Jackson encouraged the expulsion; the Congress authorized this removal policy set by the president in 1830. The Indian Removal Act was passed on May 28, 1830; they were involuntarily removed from their homes and forced to move west. The Indian Removal Act was defined as swapping the U.S. western area for the...
Words: 1731 - Pages: 7
