Premium Essay

We Should Look To The Framers Speech Analysis

Submitted By
Words 604
Pages 3
What is federalism, this is a confusing and hard question to answer, because it means so many different laws in one nation that balance each other out. Federalism splits political powers between two types of government, the states government and the federal government. The federal government laws in the end trumps the state laws. Also, the powers not enforced by the Federal government are enforced by the states government. So even though the central government might be much stronger, there is also a smaller power from each state that the federal government cannot override. Federalism makes the country, as a whole, stronger in the end because in times of war we all join together in every state to form a more powerful country. America has 50 different states, with different laws, but together they unite and band together in times of need for the same beliefs of freedom. …show more content…
Constitution created federalism because they wanted to give the central government less control. When our founding fathers wrote the constitution in 1787, they wrote with the intent to give the power back to the people. But they also understood that they needed to create a government system for America to function strong and properly. Federalism worked out the best because it allowed each state to be controlled by the central government but at the same time still able to control their own problems within their state. As Randy E. Barnett points out in a speech, “We should look to the Framers' intentions, not because we are bound by their intentions as such, but because we today share their intentions to limit the power of government in a way that enhances and protects the liberty of the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Toffoloni V. Lfp Publishing Group, 572 F.3d 1201 (2009)

...right to privacy. Nowadays, no one can be too careful when it comes to privacy because any information that reaches the press can be used to their advantage. The press does not have the right to decide whether the information gathered or provided to them is newsworthy or not, this is for the Constitution to decide. An individual should have the right to be protected by the government when the media abuses their power. The people should have the right to do or say whatever they feel at the moment without having to worry about the media. According to Zelezny, “Privacy-related lawsuits against the media have continued to escalate in the new millennium. The media successfully defend against most of these lawsuits. Yet there are enough plaintiff victories to rouse more plaintiffs…” (178). The media constantly monitors the government, but the government does not monitor the media enough. This is the reason why the courts are bombarded constantly with law suits. Government has let the media abuse of its freedom and this is why privacy has become a great issue in society. The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and press, but the government should not be negligent to overlook the way in which this freedom could affect a person and his family’s privacy. As shown in the past, the media only cares about the story, not necessarily about the people in it. For example, in the case of Time, Inc v. Hill, a family was kept hostage by three escaped convict and...

Words: 2361 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Religion in the Public Schools: Public Prayer or Private Action?

...sponsored religious speech can be difficult, but necessary to determine when dealing with religion in the public school system. In Kountze Texas, a group of cheerleaders are suing the school district because a ban was placed on their usage of religious banners before the local public school’s football games. The cheerleaders created banners, like many high school cheerleaders do, but the message painted on their signs were statements such as, “And let us run with endurance the race God has set before us” The messages on the banners are religious speech and a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Yes, the United States Constitution does allow for the freedom of religion, but it also separates Church and State. The cheerleaders painted these signs for a school organized football game; the educational institution is a public one and must abide by the United States Constitution and the separation of church and state. If the school were private, religious connotations would be permissible, but being that the school is public, the signs created by the cheerleaders would be considered government sanctioned. The Establishment Clause in the First Amendment states, “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” Throughout our nations history there has been much debate of what the framers of the Constitution meant by establishment. For instance some judges, such as Former Supreme Court Justice, William Rehnquist argued that the framers of the Constitution...

Words: 5004 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Code

...WIKIPEDIA, THE ONE SURPRISE THAT TEACHES MORE THAN EVERYTHING HERE. C O N T E N T S Preface to the Second Edition Preface to the First Edition Chapter 1. Code Is Law Chapter 2. Four Puzzles from Cyberspace PART I: “REGULABILITY” ix xiii 1 9 Chapter 3. Is-Ism: Is the Way It Is the Way It Must Be? Chapter 4. Architectures of Control Chapter 5. Regulating Code PART II: REGULATION BY CODE 31 38 61 Chapter 6. Cyberspaces Chapter 7. What Things Regulate Chapter 8. The Limits in Open Code PART III: LATENT AMBIGUITIES 83 120 138 Chapter 9. Translation Chapter 10. Intellectual Property Chapter 11. Privacy Chapter 12. Free Speech Chapter 13. Interlude PART IV: COMPETING SOVEREIGNS 157 169 200 233 276 Chapter 14. Sovereignty Chapter 15. Competition Among Sovereigns 281 294 PART V: RESPONSES Chapter 16. The Problems We...

Words: 190498 - Pages: 762

Premium Essay

Jafkjebfjk

...1. constitutionalism, constitutional supremacy and the rule of law 1. constitutionalism a. Constitution without constitutionalism? Keith E Whittington, constitutionalism [5] * Constitutionalism = the constraining of government in order to better effectuate the fundamental principles of the political regime. i.e. A system of effective restrains on governmental action. * Constitution (often) = the written document that formalizes the framework of government * => Constitutionalism should be distinguished from the mere possession of a constitution * Written constitutions may provide few effective constraints on government or may be ignored, and governments may be effectively constrained w/o a written constitution (e.g. Britain) * Constitutionalism often (does not mean it necessarily equals to) associated specifically with liberalism, protection of individual rights against the state. * => constitutional state identified not by possession of a constitution but by its effective protection of individual rights. * (but individual rights only one set of fundamental principles that might impose meaningful limits on power of the state) * Constitutionalism also used to constrain power holders to care for the common weal or adhere to particular conceptions of national identity or religious law * 3-fold classification of province of constitutionalism * Normative Constitutionalism (most touched-on area) * Concerned with...

Words: 10446 - Pages: 42

Free Essay

Compensatory Discrimination in Light of Theories of Justice

...INTRODUCTION In a civilized social system, law plays not only the role of guarantor of justice equality and liberty, but also as a tool for attaining the ends of justice. In this respect the modern democratic state has to adopt objective standards to protect the human rights of its citizens. Equality is one among those cardinal human rights by which the State is mandated to treat the equals equally and unequal unequally when it distributes its own benefits to the people. But who are equals and who are unequal is a thorny issue, for the limited resources are much valuable and required by the various group of people and they have to be distributed justly and fairly. In the Indian constitutional scheme, it had been envisaged by the framers that there should be equality of opportunity is for all citizens in public employments and such equality of opportunity a fundamental right of the citizens’.At the same time, the need for some beneficial treatment to the weaker sections of the society was also enshrined with that right. What is the basis of distribution of societal resources to certain sections? The thrust of this Chapter goes with the following enquiry. Is there any jurisprudential foundation for protective discrimination? If so what is it? This aspect is assessed from the angle of different theories of justice viz., social justice, distributive justice, equality and equal opportunity and social engineering theory. The responses of Indian courts in this regard are also examined...

Words: 7969 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Con Law

...Brown I (1954) The segregation of children in public schools based solely on race violates the Equal Protection Clause. 7 2. Brown II 8 3. What was the constitutional harm in Brown? 8 4. THEORY 8 5. Subsequent School Desegregation 9 Class 3: Local Efforts to Desegregate: Parents Involved 11 6. Parents Involved 11 Class 4: Rational Basis Review: Cleburne, Romer, etc. 13 2. Tiers of Scrutiny 13 3. Beazer (1979) 13 4. Moreno (1973) 14 5. Cleburne (1985) 14 6. Romer (1996) 15 7. Nordlinger (1992) and Allegheny Pittsburgh (1989) 16 8. Lee Optical (1955) 17 Class 5: Racial Classifications and Heightened Scrutiny: Strauder, Korematsu, Loving 17 9. Heightened Scrutiny Analysis 17 10. Strauder (1880) 17 11. Korematsu (1944) 18 12. Loving (1967) 19 13. Theories Supporting Strict Scrutiny of Racial Classifications 20 14. Tiers of Scrutiny 20 15. Tiers of Scrutiny Table 21 Class 6: Facially Neutral Classifications: Washington v. Davis 21 16. Types of Discrimination (from Fall) 21 X. Disparate Impact 21 XI. Purposive Discrimination 22 XII. Proxies for Race 23 2. Other Rules 23 3. Types of Discrimination Based on Race 24 4. South African Constitution 24 5. Arlington Heights-“A Motivating Factor” 24 6. Arlington Heights-Footnote 21 24 7. Discriminatory Purpose Without Discriminatory Effect 24 Class 7: Affirmative Action I: Adarand...

Words: 52904 - Pages: 212

Free Essay

English Langugae

.... . . . . . 1.3.3 How to parse CVC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Syllable timing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 Classical generative phonology . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.6 Pulgram on the syllable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.7 Natural phonologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.8 Flat structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.9 Metrical phonology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.10 Sonority redux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.11 Slots that hang from trees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.12 Government relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.13 Derived sonority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.14 Optimality theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.15 Must we choose between sonority and constituency? 1.16 Phonotactics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.17 Onsets, codas, and word-appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 4 5 5 6...

Words: 18260 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Article 29

...Supreme Court of India D. A. V. College Bathinda, Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 5 May, 1971 Equivalent citations: 1971 AIR 1731, 1971 SCR 677 Author: P J Reddy Bench: Sikri, S.M. (Cj), Mitter, G.K., Hegde, K.S., Grover, A.N., Reddy, P. Jaganmohan PETITIONER: D. A. V. COLLEGE BATHINDA, ETC. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT05/05/1971 BENCH: REDDY, P. JAGANMOHAN BENCH: REDDY, P. JAGANMOHAN SIKRI, S.M. (CJ) MITTER, G.K. HEGDE, K.S. GROVER, A.N. CITATION: 1971 AIR 1731 1971 SCR 677 ACT: Punjabi University Act, 1961 (35 of 1961), s. 4(3)- University making Punjabi the sole medium of Instruction and examination-Action ultra vires the power conferred by section-Also infringes rights of religious minority to conserve their script and administer their institutions. HEADNOTE: The petitioners are educational institutions founded by the D.A.V. College Trust and Society registered under the Societies Registration Act as an association comprised of Arya Samajis. These institutions were, before the reorganisation of the State of Punjab in 1966, affiliated to the Punjab University constituted under the Punjab University Act, 1947. The Punjabi University was constituted in 1961 by the Punjabi University Act (35 of 1961). After the reorganisation, the Punjab Government under s. 5 (1) of the Act specified the areas in which the Punjabi's University exercised its power and notified the date for the purpose of the section. The effect of the notification...

Words: 85744 - Pages: 343

Free Essay

Pv Narshima Rao

...MANU/SC/0293/1998 Equivalent Citation: AIR1998SC2120, 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157, 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762, 1997(1) BLJR263, 1998CriLJ2930, JT1998(3)SC318, 1998(2)PLJR67, 1998(3)SCALE53, (1998)4SCC626, [1998]2SCR870 citation image IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Crl.A. Nos. 1207-1208 of 1997 [With Crl.A. Nos. 1209/97, 1210-12/97, 1213/97, 1214/97, 1215/97, 1216/97, 1217-18/97, 1219/97, 1220/97, 1221/97, 1222/97, 186/98 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 2/98) and 187/98 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 366/98)]. Decided On: 17.04.1998 Appellants: P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. Respondent: State (CBI/SPE) Hon'ble Judges: S. C. Agrawal, G.N. Ray, A.S. Anand, S.B. Bharucha and S. Rajendra Babu, JJ. Counsels: Ashok H. Desai, Attorney General for India, T.R. Andhyarujina, Solicitor General, P.P. Rao, Kapil Sibal and D.D. Thakur, Sr. Advs., Ranjit Kumar, Anu Mohla, I.C. Pandey, C. Paramasivam, Ajay Talesara, Jamshed Bey, Rakhi Roy, Bina Gupta, Surat Singh, Ashok Mahajan, P.P. Singh, Chandrashekar, Girish Ananthamurthy, B.Y. Kulkarni, Navin Prakash, Arun Bhardwaj, K.C. Kaushik, Manish Sharma, D. Prakash Reddy, L. Nageshwara Rao, Indu Malhotra, Rajiv Dutta, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Bharat Sangal, R.P. Wadhwani, P.K. Manohar, P. Parameswaran, A. Mariarputham and S.C. Jain, Advs Subject: Media and Communication Subject: Criminal Acts/Rules/Orders: Privileges of Parliament Act, 1512 ;Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 108, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 164, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section...

Words: 64031 - Pages: 257

Premium Essay

Yoshino

...A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM?: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Kenji Yoshino The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges1 achieved canonical status even as Justice Kennedy read the result from the bench. A bare majority held that the Fourteenth Amendment required every state to perform and to recognize marriages between individuals of the same sex.2 The majority opinion ended with these ringing words about the plaintiffs: “Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”3 While Obergefell’s most immediate effect was to legalize same-sex marriage across the land, its long-term impact could extend far beyond this context. To see this point, consider how much more narrowly the opinion could have been written. It could have invoked the equal protection and due process guarantees without specifying a formal level of review, and then observed that none of the state justifications survived even a deferential form of scrutiny. The Court had adopted this strategy in prior gay rights cases.4 Instead, the Court issued a sweeping statement that could be compared to Loving v. Virginia,5 the 1967 case that invalidated bans on in–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––  Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge receiving financial support from...

Words: 15849 - Pages: 64

Premium Essay

Ramlila Maidan Case

...MANU/SC/0131/2012 Equivalent Citation: 2012(3)ALT(Cri)91, 2012CriLJ3516, 2012(1)Crimes241(SC), 2012(2)J.L.J.R.91, (2012)2MLJ32(SC), 2012(2)PLJR217, 2012(2) SCALE682, (2012)5SCC1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 122 of 2011 (Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India) Decided On: 23.02.2012 Appellants: Ramlila Maidan Incident Vs. Respondent: Home Secretary, Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Hon'ble Judges/Coram: Swatanter Kumar and Balbir Singh Chauhan, JJ. Counsels: For Appearing Parties: P.P. Malhotra, ASG, Rajeev Dhavan, Amicus Curiae, Ram Jethmalani, P.H. Parekh, Sr. Advs., Udita Singh, L.R. Singh, Shubhranshu Pedhi, Anil Katiyar, Lata Krishnamurti, Balajji Subramanian, Manu Sharma, Karan Kalia, Pranav Diesh, Sanjay Jain, Vikas Garg, B.K. Prasad, Siddhartha Dave, Shailender Sharma, S.N. Terdal, D.P. Mohanty, Subhasree Chatterjee, Anand Shankar Jha, Ekansh Misra, Advs. for Parekh and Co., Kamini Jaiswal, Shomila Bakshi, Abhimanyu Shrestha and Kumud L. Das, Advs. Subject: Constitution Subject: Criminal Acts/Rules/Orders: Constitution of India (44th Amendment) Act, 1979; Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Constitution of India (Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963; Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2010; Constitution of India (Forty-Second Amendment) Act, 1976; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Section 33(1); Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Section 17(1), Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Section 28, Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Section 29, Delhi...

Words: 56244 - Pages: 225

Premium Essay

1. “Leaders Are Born Not Made”

...NIRD – OB and OD Assignment in Leadership 1. “Leaders are born not made” – Discuss your argument citing two leaders of your choice. 2. Compare and contrast the leadership styles of any two pairs listed below: a. Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru b. JRD Tata and Dhirubhai Ambani c. Bill Gates (Microsoft) and Jack Welch (General Electric) 3. From the leaders cited in Question 2, discuss the following: a. How did their personality traits interact with situations to shape the outcomes b. Is there a commonality in the styles of leadership exhibited c. Are good and poor leadership, qualitatively different phenomena ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Leaders are born not made Many people say leaders are made. This is the greatest delusion ever concocted by man. Any leader who is worth his salt is a born leader. Society presents circumstances that enable one to be fashioned or molded into a leader. That’s the greatest contribution of society to mankind – it identifies a leader from its surroundings. A distinction has to be made between true leaders and quack leaders. True leaders know that they are born for a purpose. Society is their laboratory. They experiment and display various leadership skills which benefit society as a whole. There are also true leaders who...

Words: 4831 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

After Campbell: Parody

...and the fair use doctrine. ... Further, this note evaluates how the defendant used the fair use doctrine as an exception to copyright in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. ... The district court recognized that courts have included parody under the fair use doctrine. ... The district court found that the second factor, the nature of the copyrighted work, weighed against fair use and in favor of Acuff-Rose. ... Judge Joiner, writing for the majority, considered each of the factors in section 107 in determining that the derivative work was not fair use. ... The Supreme Court's Application of the Fair Use Doctrine in Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Campbell ... He observed that the application of the fair use doctrine requires a case-by-case analysis, as opposed to "bright-line rules." Such an approach is necessary because section 107 does not define every type of creative work that a court may exempt under the fair use doctrine. ... However, the Court of Appeals read Sony as presuming unfair use when a derivative work is used for commercial purposes and found that the fourth factor weighed against fair use. ... HIGHLIGHT: Satire is the sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybody's face but their own. -- Jonathan Swift n1 TEXT: [*627] I. Introduction Suppose that an artist sees another person's copyrighted work as rich in potential for some pointed social criticism or a wry humorous...

Words: 11940 - Pages: 48

Premium Essay

Education

...GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IN EDUCATION By J. P. NAIK 1.One of the major educational controversies today refers to the role of the Government of India in education. Prima facie education is a State subject. Entry 11 of the List II of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution lays down that “education including universities, subject to the provisions of Entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List III” should be a State subject. But there are some other provisions in the Constitution itself which contradict the almost absolute delegation of authority suggested by this entry in the State list; and what is even more significant, the Central Government has since shown an unprecedented activity and interest in the field of education ever since the attainment of independence. In 1947, it appointed a University Commission and has since been engaged in evolving common policies in Higher education such as the introduction of the three-year degree course. This was followed by a Secondary Education Commission which tried to introduce a number of uniform trends in a field where the Centre has had hardly any constitutional authority. No Commission was appointed in the field of Primary education. But the scheme of Basic education was declared to have gone beyond the stage of experimentation and was also adopted as the national pattern at the Elementary stage. The interest of the Central Government in Technical education and...

Words: 19844 - Pages: 80

Premium Essay

Pols Final Exam Review

...Federal Government Exam 1 Review: The first exam will consist of questions generated from the following review sheet. Make sure you understand each of these topics before proceeding to the test. The exam will be timed so you will not have the ability to peruse your notes or retake the exam. The exam itself will consist of 30 multiple choice questions and you will have 35 minutes to complete the exam. Federalism: The Basic elements of a Federal system of government (i.e. how is it structured/how power is shared) • Layers of gov • Equal power • Distinct powers Powers of the federal government: delegated powers, implied powers (necessary and proper clause), and concurrent powers. • Delegated Powers: (expressed/enumerated powers) powers given to the federal government directly by the constitution. Some most important delegated powers are: the authority to tax, regulated interstate commerce, authority to declare war, and grants the president role of commander and chief of the military • Implied Powers: Powers not expressed in the constitution, but that can be inferred. “Necessary and proper clause” • Concurrent powers: powers shared by both levels of government. Ex: Taxes, roads, elections, commerce, establishing courts and a judicial system • Reserved powers: powers not assigned by the constitution to the national government but left to the states or the people. Guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Include “police power”-health and public...

Words: 37488 - Pages: 150