Premium Essay


In: Novels

Submitted By fatgode23
Words 1080
Pages 5
Fitzgerald’s satirical portrait of modern society using Gatsby’s parties as support

“The Great Gatsby,” a novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald, depicts life in the 1920’s. “The Roaring Twenties,” a nickname given to the decade which was loaded with money and industry. It was a time where the rich people in society only had so much to do, and so much money to spend in many ways. Jay Gatsby, one of the “newly” rich people, chooses to spend his money recklessly; throwing large, extravagant parties every weekend of the summer. Fitzgerald paints a picture of modern society by writing about these crazy parties that Gatsby hosts; and using wealth to impress, lack of morals in modern society and The American Dream. All factors of how Gatsby uses parties for support and how the American Dream can be portrayed in the “Roaring Twenties.”

Gatsby’s parties were huge, they brought great numbers of people from all over New York, the people who came were all unknown to each other, not many people were actually invited, and they just came, not knowing Gatsby, they did not care about him. When Nick Carraway describes what he has seen before Gatsby’s party, “At least once a fortnight a corps of caterers came down....On the buffet tables, garnished with glistening hors d’ oeuvre, spiced baked hams crowded against salads of harlequin designs and pastry pigs...In the main hall a bar with a real brass rail....By seven o’clock the orchestra has arrived” (44), he tells of the luxuries provided by Gatsby in order to accommodate and impress his guests. Fitzgerald is mocking the way people in modern society try to impress each other, in this case with wealth and materialism. Gatsby’s careless spending represents the amount of unpractical spending that when on in many peoples lives before the stock market crash in the Roaring...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Wealth and Power

...Wealth and power have a large impact on sports. Athletes seem to need great power and strength when it comes to competing. The salaries of the athletes are over the top outrageous. This causes some of them to begin to care more about the money and less about the sport. This often leads to bad behavior like gambling and other illegal acts and they soon become bad role models to the people who idol them. Sports started off as an innocent form of physical form of physical recreation and has been manipulated and influenced by people with more money and power than others. Sports are a distraction from your everyday life, more like a stress reliever for many. True social functions that consist of sports help can help society function better, but the perks of the higher society having better access and more money to sponsor or facilitate the events opens the door to manipulation. Many of the fan, athletes, and imagined communities own or have invested in the places that house the sporting events, and are allowed favoritism. Conflicts between parents arise about a bad call or favoritism being shown to one child over the other. When it comes to decision making time of who is right or wrong, if the person of authority is close to one family and have money tied up in the place, who do you think the person is going to side with? You are right, the person who has the ability to keep the place open. Wealth and power does have a huge impact on any person involved in the sports......

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Wealth Rules

...11/13/12 Argumentative essay The speech by King Lear mentions that the wealthy don’t have to follow the common rules of justice for they are protected by their wealth which entitles them to be overlooked, while the poor have to fall to every hardship in justice and there wrongs are obviously seen and ridiculed. While some people may believe this others may not. Celebrities are put in the wealthy part of the society and believed they can do whatever they want. In the news you will hear about celebrities getting arrested for drinking and driving or even doing drugs. These people though they are not sent to jail they are sent to rehab. If someone that was poor was to be arrested for drinking and driving they will go to jail no thought about even possibly going to rehab. Now why is that, because they are able to afford going to rehab and they can hire lawyers that aim for it. They use their money to get what they want; celebrities don’t want to go to jail. Poor people though don’t want to go to jail also, but they don’t have a choice because they can’t afford to go to rehab. Celebrities use their money to get out of the rightful justice. It not only celebrities that use their money to get out of the correct justice, you never hear about lawyers or judges going to jail or even getting in trouble. Why is that? They can’t be perfect and never get in trouble, but lawyers and judges make money so is possible to just pay off individuals for your crimes and make people believe......

Words: 510 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Wealth Creation

...Economic theory relates to wealth creation because economics is the study of human behavior, with a particular focus on human decision making. Wealth creation is impossible without good decision making. Wealth is generated when we are able to produce a surplus that exceeds what we need for survival. One main factor in the study of economics is the maintenance and transfer of wealth, which is an additional reason of why wealth creation is relevant to economics. According to a recent article in Forbes, wealth is created by, and morally belongs to the individual creator. I agree with this opinion. Wealth creation is beneficial for everyone that has a slice of the “economic pie”. For example, the creators invention may benefit the consumer by giving him an easier tool to use for his job, which would allow him to get more done at once, then in return would be profitable for both the creator and consumer. The opinion in Forbes magazine correlates with the text book in the sense that they both state that economic goods are the result of human ingenuity (p.34). A real-world example of wealth creation would be Apple, Inc. Steve Jobs created a series of profitable products that in return benefit the consumer by making tedious daily tasks seamless. Just as the text states, “A larger income for one person does not mean a smaller income for a trading partner.”( Gwartney,Stroup,Sobel,Machperson p.34)The economic pie expands when we all earn income, which makes it easier for everyone......

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Distribution of Wealth

...Distribution of Wealth? Wealth has affected american society and evermore has affect the fabric of families. Has the distribution of wealth gotten so out of control that the effect will reverberate for generations to come and as a society can we do something about it. When we were tasked to write this final research paper on one of the topics from the discussions over the past semester i knew that i had to do a topic that i had dealt with on some personal level even know i have experienced many of the topics over the last semester the one that spoke to me the most is the distribution of wealth because of the simple fact that in my core family unit there is a gap in the distribution of wealth with me now below the poverty line my mother and father who i live with who are apart of the middle class and my birth father who is of the upper class in this paper i will uncover the differences and the similarities between these classes also is it fair that some have all and some have none and will the government do or should not do anything with the situation as well as the themes of what can change and how people feel about the situation at hand and how much is enough and why is it not enough and does the level of wealth make us happy i will also discuss these topics in interviews with my family. In a study conducted by the American psychological association they posed a question money can’t buy happiness? and in reading the article which puts poignant questions to people who......

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Wealth and Power in America

...Wealth & Power in America Name Institution Wealth & Power in America 1. In your opinion, who has political power in the United States? Who lacks it? Why? The congress has the political power in the United States. This is because the congress is entitled to writing the laws. The government and the president do not have the political power in U.S. The president is only entitled to signing the laws made by the congress. The Supreme Court, on the other hand, only decides whether the made laws are constitutional or not (Barret, Stokholm, & Burke, 2001). The wealth and the rich also have immense political power in U.S. 2. What is your opinion of the "American Dream" and the idea that anyone can work hard and succeed? “American Dream” refers to a concept that argues that people can lead happy and successful lives if they embrace the need to work hard. It also argues that freedom, meaningful relationships, and a person’s fulfillment can be achieved if a person works hard. However, in my opinion, not all people can achieve the goal of this dream. This is attributed to the society-structure of the United States. People live in varying social classes, ethnicity, and religion. This different structure of the American society hinders the achievement of this dream (Barret et al., 2001). Some people face a lot of discrimination in the workplaces. Discrimination, in most of these workplaces, is based on one’s color and background ethnicity. Such people are denied job......

Words: 1012 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Wealth Inequality in the Bible

...warns that the love of riches leads men further from the Kingdom of God and into a false idolization of wealth. This monetary worship pulls man away from God, and tears the seams of brotherhood that bond men together. Today, this bond between men has never been so frail and apathy has never been so vigorous. Millions of people die every year from preventable causes, including hunger, disease and countless other conditions, all derived from poverty. At the same time the richest 80 billionaires have the finances to solve world hunger, substantially increase the prevention of AIDS and effectively eradicate malaria. Wealth in itself is not evil; however, when humanity places riches above its fellow humans’ lives, it has reached a sinful state. The world has accepted material wealth at the price of what has become a sacrificial morality and love for mankind. The goal of this paper is to prove that global trends of economic inequality are unjustifiable from an economic/social standpoint, Scripture, and the recent position of the Catholic Church. Financial inequality is no new concept to the world. Since the beginnings of civilization there were the rich and there were the poor; many would argue that this is the natural state of society. From the Roman Empire until today, there has been a gap between the two segments. While almost all major religions warn man of the dangers of wealth and support charity, this gap between rich and poor has never been eradicated. Even so, all......

Words: 3323 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Wealth and Power in the Us

...Wealth and Power in the United States POL/443 Wealth and Power in the United States What is wealth? Generally speaking wealth if the value of everything a person or family owns, minus any debts, G. W. Domhoff (2015). Although many of us think of the division of wealth as an equal in the United States, the reality is completely different and shocking; to say the least. Because of this, there are three theories created; pluralism, elite theory, and state autonomy. Each of these theories where created to understand the structure of power in the United States. As we see each of their purpose, a few question comes to mind; who benefits? Who governs? And who wins? In 2013 wealth inequality in the United States was greater than in most developed countries other than Switzerland and Denmark, Weissmann, Jordan (2013). The top 1% (also known at the elites) of the American population owns 42.7% of the country’s total wealth. Meaning the next 19% of Americans owning 50.3%, and the bottom 80% owning 7%, Deborah L. Jacobs (2011). However, after the Great Recession (which started in 2007), the share of total wealth owned by the top 1% of the population grew from 34.6% to 37.1%, and that owned by the top 20% of Americans grew from 85% to 87.7%. The Great Recession also caused a drop of 36.1% in median household wealth but a drop only 11.1% for the top 1%, further widening the gap between the top 1% and the bottom 99%. According to the Institute for Policy Studies, in September...

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Wealth Inequality

... INTRODUCTION I. Financial inequality is greater now than it has been at anytime in the last century, and the gaps in wages, income, and wealth in America, are wider here than they are in any other developed economy. II. THESIS STATEMENT: Wealth inequality in the USA does not allow those living in poverty to climb out and join the middle class, and keeps most wealth, power, and privilege in the hands of a select few. (Transition History} BODY I. After the Stock Market Crash of 1929, the gap between the rich and the poor began to narrow. (Borrow, pg. 167) A. The current rise of inequality in America can be traced back to 1979. B. Wages still differed greatly between the upper- and working-classes. 1. Unequal educational opportunites 2. Inherited wealth means unequal distribution 3. Discrimination (Race, gender, sexuality) 1. According to the Pew Research Center, the top 7 percent of all U.S. households own 63 percent of all the wealth in the country. According the U.S. Census buruo are living in poverty.  That is a brand new all-time record high. (Transition: How?) II. Owning a home, then equal pay for equal work, and then having a college degree are the three factors that can make the biggest difference in closing the wealth gap A. Working towards goals such as education and home ownership will help people living in poverty bridge the gap between the......

Words: 358 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Wealth of Nations

...The Wealth of Nations Chapter I – Of the Division of Labour Summarize: Division of Labour is thought by Smith to increases Wealth of Nations. Increase in skill, dexterity and productivity of labor is most affected by DOL. The idea of the division of labour relates primarily to the specialization of the labor force, basically the breaking down of large jobs into many tiny components. Under this system each worker becomes an expert in one isolated area of production, thus increasing his efficiency. The fact that laborers do not have to switch tasks during the day further saves time and money. By allowing machines to step in to help with the production, the operation will be simpler and make into routine. Machines make production process speeds up its level and produce goods faster. Argumentation: The audience that the author was writing for were capitalists. This is supported by the writer's suggestions in the article. Adam Smith suggests that manufactures should divide its labor force into obvious groups. Each of them should do different operation instead of having a single worker doing all of the operations by himself. The main focus of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations lies in the concept of economic growth. The only factor that he mentions that effects the growth is the supply of labor. However, in modern economics, other factors such as land, capital, technology, knowledge, and etc. also influence the productivity of the labor, therefore, the wealth of the......

Words: 725 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Relation Between Wealth and Happiness

...THE RELATION BETWEEN WEALTH AND HAPPINESS A1: The articles The Sandra Bullock Trade and But Will It Make You Happier? both dis-cuss the relation between wealth and happiness, and it doesn’t require much to figure out, that these articles agree that happiness doesn’t depend on wealth in general. But as The Sandra Bullock Trade nearly refuses any connection between the two and even states that “if you have an unsuccessful marriage (…) you will remain significantly unfulfilled” (p. 2), But Will It Make You Happier? points out that even though happiness isn’t dependent on income, your buys will influence your mood. The Sandra Bullock Trade acknowledges that poor people are generally unhappier, but the article also claims that as long as your basic needs are fulfilled, money makes no difference. This is probably the biggest disagreement between the articles, as But Will It Make You Happier? is somewhat more capable of differ-entiating the dilemma. Instead of just having a one-tack mind, the article focuses on both the pleasure that money can bring, but it also declares how we are more likely to find joy when we buy social activities than when we buy material objects. A2: The Sandra Bullock Trade catches your attention from the very beginning. The headline itself makes you want to read it, because a celebrity like Sandra Bullock is a person that will instantly catch your attention whether you want her to or not. Another means, which The Sandra Bullock Trade uses, is to......

Words: 742 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Wealth Unequality

...The wealth chasm: a dangerous cocktail The street demonstrations of 2011 and 2012 are still fresh in our minds. Thousands of voices chanting, “We are the 99%!” and blockading the stock exchange have not left the psyche of American’s, and were successful in getting their message across. Before 2011, it was heard in whispers: “They have too much.” Now, it’s a shout. The rich are indeed doing very well for themselves. In fact, the wealth gap is almost unprecedented, except for right before the great depression, and the subsequent rebellion that shook the United States that ultimately resulted in the New Deal. (DeSilver, 2013) History doesn’t necessarily repeat, but we are seeing a world eerily similar to that which was in place before 1929: The rich hoarding all the money and anger simmering in the proletariat. Globally, the reaction against this sort of systemic looting of the people by the capitalist class is taking form and is becoming increasingly better organized and more violent. The global wealth gap is a combustible recipe for insurrection, and will result in a collapse of capitalism and the rise of radical left, and right wing ideologies if it is not fixed. The wealth gap in the world is at astonishing levels. A simple browse of the news, or the Facebook feed of any liberal-leaning page will bring up statistics that would seem like they were made up if we weren’t bombarded by them at all times, and the data to back them up. According to William Domhoff of the......

Words: 1552 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Wealth Distribution and William Domhoffs "Wealth, Income, and Power"

...Domhoff’s article, Wealth, Income, and Power, he examines wealth distribution in the United States, specifically financial inequality. He concludes that the wealthiest 10% of the United States effectively owns America, and that this is due in large part to an increase in unequal distribution of wealth between 1983 and 2004. Domhoff also states that the unequal wealth distribution is due in large part to tax cuts for the wealthy and the defeat of labor unions. Most of Domhoff’s information is accurate and includes strong, valid arguments and statements. However, there is room for improvement when identifying the subject of what is causing the inequality. The most important points made in Domhoff’s article are his statistics, the reason behind the unequal wealth distribution, and his closing statement concerning the top 10%. In his article, Domhoff cites many statistics regarding the distribution of wealth between America’s top and bottom percentiles. There is quite a bit of research to back up his claims, and his data is generally very accurate. However, when it comes to the cause of such gaps in wealth distribution, there is more to consider than simply tax cuts and labor unions. Domhoff begins with a broad overview of wealth distribution in the United States. He states that the top 1% held 34.6% of all privately held wealth, with 85% in the hands of the top 20%, leaving the bottom 80% in control of only 15% of privately held wealth. In terms of financial wealth, he states......

Words: 1179 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Impact on Wealth Growth from Globalization

...The Impact on Wealth Growth from globalization: critical thinking #2 The Impact on Wealth Growth from globalization: critical thinking #2 The Impact on Wealth Growth from Globalization There are a lot of concerns for today’s economy. One of them being wealth distribution. There is the poor, middle class, and the rich. It is evident from the graph shown that the poor are getting richer, the rich are getting richer, and the middle class is getting poorer. So, what is the cause of this? The big answer economist will say is “It Depends”. It depends what factor you look at because there are many. The one I want to focus on is globalization. Is globalization a factor in wealth growth? How is it a factor? Is globalization positive or negative for wealth growth? If anything, what should be done? These are all the question I will try my best to answer in this essay. Globalization VS Wealth Growth Back to the previous question, does globalization effect wealth growth? My answer is, yes. It absolutely effects wealth growth for all nations. Globalization effects a lot of economic studies. For an explanation, let me first define globalization. defines Globalization as the tendency of businesses, technologies, or philosophies to spread throughout the world, or the process of making this happen. The global economy is sometimes referred to as a globality, characterized as a totally interconnected marketplace, unhampered by time zones or national boundaries. There are...

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

How to Make Wealth

...If you wanted to get rich, how would you do it? I think your best bet would be to start or join a startup. That's been a reliable way to get rich for hundreds of years. The word "startup" dates from the 1960s, but what happens in one is very similar to the venture-backed trading voyages of the Middle Ages. Startups usually involve technology, so much so that the phrase "high-tech startup" is almost redundant. A startup is a small company that takes on a hard technical problem. Lots of people get rich knowing nothing more than that. You don't have to know physics to be a good pitcher. But I think it could give you an edge to understand the underlying principles. Why do startups have to be small? Will a startup inevitably stop being a startup as it grows larger? And why do they so often work on developing new technology? Why are there so many startups selling new drugs or computer software, and none selling corn oil or laundry detergent? The Proposition Economically, you can think of a startup as a way to compress your whole working life into a few years. Instead of working at a low intensity for forty years, you work as hard as you possibly can for four. This pays especially well in technology, where you earn a premium for working fast. Here is a brief sketch of the economic proposition. If you're a good hacker in your mid twenties, you can get a job paying about $80,000 per year. So on average such a hacker must be able to do at least $80,000 worth of work per......

Words: 8960 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Pursuing Equality in Distribution of Wealth in Indonesia

...Wealth inequality is an economic challenge faced by all countries in the world. In every country, there will always be high income and low income people. Unless a country implements full communism doctrine, there will always a high variance in the income of the society of a country. However, the practice of communism to eliminate inequality is not justifiable because the costs of doing so are bigger than the benefits. Indonesia has been trapped in the world of inequality for so long. This is not a trivial inequality that we are talking about here. There is a huge gap between the rich and poor people in Indonesia. For example, the richest person in Indonesia based on Forbes December 2007; Abu Rizal Bakrie has Rp.50.22 trillion of net worth. It is greatly contradictive if we contrast his financial condition to that of the poverty in Indonesia. World Bank states that people with daily living expenses less than $2/day falls below the poverty line. Using that definition, approximately 60% of Indonesians are in the category of poor people. I constantly see children around the traffic light begging for money, just to have enough pennies to buy their next lunch. They wear weary clothes and education is merely a dream for them. This is happening all the time, in every part of Indonesia. Indonesia has an income per capita of $1,640. It seems like okay compared to Burundi?s per capita income of $119 (which is the lowest in the world). However, when we take a closer look, we will......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2