Premium Essay

Wgu Jdt2 Task 1

In: Business and Management

Submitted By rrh1382
Words 1007
Pages 5
interoffice memorandum to: | CEO | from: | Robby Hinson | subject: | Title vii | date: | June 10, 2014 | cc: | | | |
A former employee recently filed a claim against our organization in reference to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I researched and reviewed multiple case studies related to this situation and have provided a recommendation based on this research.
For starters, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that “It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (FINDLAW) This act was passed to help promote equal employment opportunities for females and minorities. The former employee feels that his rights were violated because he was required to work on what was considered a holy day based on his religion, however, there is no indication that the employee made the company aware of this issue.
As you are aware, we recently implemented a schedule that would require all non-office staff to work twelve hour shifts on a rotating 4 days on, 4 days off work period. This schedule was made with no reference to time off for religious holidays. The claim against the organization stems from a former employee who was displeased with the new scheduling requirement, which forced him to work on a holy day.
According to the U. S. Equal Employment Commission, constructive discharge is defined as “forcing an employee to resign by making the work environment so intolerable a reasonable person would not be able to stay.” (EEOC) Furthermore, the EEO states that “an employer is liable for constructive discharge when it imposes intolerable...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Wgu Jdt2 Task 1

...TO: Bob Smith, CEO FROM:, Elementary Division Manager DATE: January 21, 2014 SUBJECT: Title VII Employee Claim A claim has been filed by a former employee under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The claim is that due to a recent policy change that requires employees to work four days consisting of twelve hours each then be off for four days was discriminatory based on the fact that employees would have to work on a religious holiday. Constructive Discharge and Its Relationship To This Claim In resolving this claim, courts may use what is known as constructive discharge. In this case the complainant would have to prove that the decisions were made solely to force them to quit. There are many things that have to be proven to actually make a constructive discharge claim. The company had to have made a change that led directly to the complainant’s resignation. The complainant also would have had to resign in a reasonable enough amount of time to show a relationship between the schedule changes and their resignation. In addition to that relationship the complainant will need to demonstrate that the working conditions as a result of the schedule change were so intolerable that any reasonable employee would have quit under them. What is not constructive discharge is if a person had a long withstanding item that they didn’t like and it wasn’t so intolerable they didn’t quit right away. They also would not have a constructive discharge case if they simply quit...

Words: 1714 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Rjdt Task 1

...Human Resources Task 1: Memorandum to Chief Executive Officer WGU Toy Company Western Governors University In partial fulfillment of the requirements of Human Resources JDT2 Memorandum to Chief Executive Officer WGU Toy Company TO: WGU Toy Company, Chief Executive Officer FROM: Elementary Division Manager DATE: June 18, 2013 SUBJECT: Constructive Discharge Claim As a result of a work schedule policy change at WGU Toy Company, a constructive discharge was filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 related to religious discrimination by a former employee. This is due to a policy change that required toy company employees to work rotating shifts to accommodate the demands of production. In this former employee’s claim, rotation would fall on a religious holy day. The rotating schedule change is required for all production employees but would not affect office staff members who will maintain 0800 to 1700 Monday through Friday work schedules. This memorandum will provide information to assist WGU Toy Company with recommendations in handling this claim. The nature of discrimination charges were best explained through review of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which identifies definitions specific to this claim against WGU Toy Company. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act states, “it is illegal to discriminate against someone based on race, color, religion, national origin, or sex” (U.S. Equal Employment......

Words: 1726 - Pages: 7