Whistle Blowing

In: Social Issues

Submitted By marikari
Words 1688
Pages 7
WHISTLE BLOWING
Defination
Whistle blowing is an attempt by an employee or former employer of an organization to disclose what she or he believes to be wrong doing sin or by the organization (James 1995)
In Whistleblowing, raising concerns and speaking up are all phrases which describe disclosing information to an employer or where appropriate a regulator, police or the media about malpractice, wrongdoing or a risk to safety.
Whistleblowing is providing a solution to resolve such situations: it opens nonexistent or hidden information sources and channels. The reasons for revealing information can be manifold: e.g. when someone notices such an abuse at his/her place of work and would like to discuss it with the relevant person within the organization. We may call it whistleblowing as well when an employee is forced to try to put an end to some kind of unlawful or malignant activities with the help of extra-organizational channels as within the organization either the proper investigation of the case is not guaranteed or the employee might be subject to reprisals. In many cases someone considers it a cause enough to publicize confidential information when the information in question concerns the public at large. In such cases the whistleblower maintains that informing the public is of much stronger interest (namely of public interest) then reserving the confidentiality, exclusivity of the information.
A Whistleblower is an informant who exposes wrongdoing within an organization in the hope of stopping it
Introduction
Whistle blowing brings into conflict the moral values of fairness and loyalty. An example to explain the values and show the conflict is where a company weighs the option of promoting one employee based on their talent or to promote a long standing but unskilled employee for a vacant position.
Other values that come into play in whistle blowing are…...

Similar Documents

Whistle Blowing

...1. Section 301.4 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the audit committee of a public company to establish procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters. The audit committee is required to establish procedures for those complainants to be treated confidentially, and for the submission process to be anonymous for employees submitting the complaints about accounting or auditing matters. 2. The key criteria to create an effective corporate whistleblower hotline, is to ensure the employers are properly protected against as many possible lash back from whistle-blowing. This is the major deterrent to whistle blowing, as although law states employee rights are protected, sometimes it is ambiguous in trying to prove that an employee is being victimized, in which case, the employee rights would be rendered useless. The remedy to this dilemma is to assure employee confidentiality. According to the AICPA, an effective whistleblowing program must ensure that submissions of complaints related to accounting, internal controls, and auditing are automatically and directly submitted to the audit committee. Management personally should not have the opportunity to filter through complaints before submission to the audit committee. AICPA also mandates the level of confidentiality and trust. The audit committee should provide strong leadership in development and maintenance of...

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Whistle Blowing

...1. Define Whistle blowing. Whistle blowing is when a worker reports suspected wrongdoing at work. Officially this is called ‘making a disclosure in the public interest’. A worker can report things that aren’t right, are illegal or if anyone at work is neglecting their duties, including: someone’s health and safety is in danger, damage to the environment, a criminal offence, the company isn’t obeying the law (like not having the right insurance), covering up wrongdoing. https://www.gov.uk/whistleblowing 2. What are the positive and negative aspects of whistle blowing based from the movie? Every organization desires honesty amongst their employees. Such an element allows for complete dedication to the organization's mission, and success. By encouraging a whistle blowing culture within the organization, the organization promotes, transparent structure and effective, clear communication. More importantly, whistle blowing can protect the organization's clients. Whistle blowing, also, is a necessary facet within an organization. Without it, fraud, misconduct, and failure become prominent within an organization. In the case of the movie, Salt, the guy that was interviewed by Evelyn Salt and was heard by another CIA’s, the guy bear false-witness against Evelyn and she was accused of being a Russian Spy. I didn’t see anything positive aspects of whistle blowing in the movie since the whistle blower was from outside of the business. It may be not telling and only accusing...

Words: 369 - Pages: 2

Whistle-Blowing: Enron

...Whistle blowing is an act to disclose an organizational wrongdoing to parties that can take action. Sherron Watkins was the vice president of Enron Corporation that became a whistle blower in 2001. She sent an anonymous memo to Enron Chairman Kenneth Lay regarding the misstatements on the financial report. Enron hired lawyers from Vinson & Elkins to do an investigation on the financial misstatement allegations (Ackman, 2002). According to the memo from the investigations, after Watkins identified herself Lay held a meeting with her to discuss about her concerns regarding her allegations. The memo failed to indicate what Lay told Watkins. The investigation from Vinson & Elkins concluded that the questionable transaction that Watkins was concern about appeared proper (Ackman, 2002). Dan Ackman from Forbes argued that her action was not considered as whistle-blowing because she did not send the memo to parties that can take disciplinary action but actually provided legal cover for Kenneth Lay. Also, the fact that Watkins warned Lay about the misstatement of financial report indicates that Lay was not aware about the problem and did not do it on purpose. Watkins tries to put the blame mostly on Enron’s auditor Arthur Andersen and Vinson & Elkins and continued to provide cover to Lay and the board. Attitudes towards Whistle Blowing In today’s society, whistle blowing is viewed as misconduct and usually will cost a person’s job. In Watkins case, she said that Enron’s former...

Words: 1358 - Pages: 6

Is Whistle Blowing Appropriate?

...Is whistle blowing appropriate? Whistle blowing legislation and organizational whistleblowing policies are intended to reduce the wrongdoing in organizations and protect the person that reports these wrongdoings. It is easier for employees to report wrongdoing when the issue of of a legal nature, as compared to wrongdoings that have an ethical issue to them. The legal wrongdoing is clearer and therefore the whistleblower has less confusion in the matter. Additionally, the whistleblower may feel that they are legally responsible if they do not report the behavior or incident (Tsahuridu & Vandekerckhove, 2008). Ethical wrongdoing is mercurial, leaving the issue open for translation, if it is not clearly stated as wrong in the company policies. Not all issues can be clearly covered even in a comprehensive policy. This leaves employees unclear about the situation and the appropriate action to take. Individuals in the workplace should feel safe reporting potential wrongdoing regardless of exact knowledge of its nature. Any circumstance that appears to be unethical to an individual should be reported and is appropriate. This will assist the individual in continuing to be a moral individual and support the development of an ethical organization (Alleyne, Hudaib, & Pike, 2013; Badaracco & Ellsworth, 1989). Does whistle blowing violate company loyalty? Whistleblowing does present itself as a conflict between the organization or organizational...

Words: 936 - Pages: 4

Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing Intention Among Public Sector Agencies

...CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Background of Study Nowadays, integrity issues become frequently discuss and report among reporters and society. As we know, integrity is a part of ethical values that shows the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. It is important to be integrity person to ensure the task or jobs are more honest and there is no abuse of power among the public or private employees. The situation can be seen in several countries, there are a lot of unethical behaviors from employer or employees. There must be a reason unethical behavior happened. So, whistle-blowing protection was introduced in order to prevent any unethically behaviors in organization such as fraud, corruption, abuse of power and so on. Whistle-blowing has been defined as ‘disclosure by a current of former organization member of illegal, inefficient, or unethical practices in a organization to a person or parties who have the power or resources to take action ( Near and Meceli, 1985). It continues to receive media intention (Vinten, 1997). Whistle blowing is a deliberate non-obligatory act of disclosure, which gets onto public record and is made by a person who has or had privileged access to data or information of an organization, about non-trivial illegality or other wrongdoing whether actual, suspected or anticipated which implicates and is under the control of that organization, to an external entity having potential to rectify the wrong doing. Whistleblowing...

Words: 7215 - Pages: 29

Whistle Blowing

...Whistle Blowing The expression 'whistle blowing' is a comparatively recent entry into the language of politics and public affairs, even though the sort of behavior to which it refers is not entirely new. It is employed here to mean the process by which insiders 'go public' with their claims of mismanagement by, or within, powerful organizations. Whistle blowing, differentiates from such correlated practices as in-house criticism, official and unofficial 'leaks' and the like. Nonetheless, this allows blowing the whistle to be interpreted as a type of behavior which has an extended, if definitely irregular, lineage. The history of whistle blowing is not smooth, in that such practices are sporadically isolated in time, unpredictable in their route and undefined in their appearance. However they are on the other hand available, for an account of historical connection, in the sense that such behavior stands witness to those powerful and deep-rooted communications, whereby the West declares the uniqueness of its own political custom and particularly those point of views, regarding individual rights, the claims of principles, the responsibilities of citizens, and the emancipatory power of reason. What makes the practice of more general and theoretical concern, however, is that the very concept of whistle blowing is highly suggestive of, and responsive to, developing features of social structure and political procedure. This is a trait it shares with its facade, the notion...

Words: 525 - Pages: 3

Whistle Blowing

...Dana Brown Whistle blowing Article Link: http://www.computingcases.org/case_materials/hughes/case_history/hughes_case_history.html Whistle-blowing is the disclosure by current or former employees of illegal, immoral or illegitimate organizational practices to people or organizations that may be able to change the practice. The whistle- blower lacks the power to change the undesirable practice directly and so appeals to others either inside or outside the organization. A good example of whistle-blowing is shown in the “The Hughes Whistle blowing Case. “ In the mid 1980s, Hughes Microelectronics was manufacturing what were called hybrid microchips for use in guidance systems and other military programs. This case is about what happened when employees of Hughes Microelectronics noticed that these tests were being skipped. The decisions they made to report this makes this one of the classic cases in the history of whistle-blowing. Margaret Goodearl and Ruth Ibarra are the two whistle-blowers in this case. Goodearl was in charge (along with Donald LaRue) of the floor area in which the testing was done. Ibarra was a quality control agent hired by the company to provide an additional audit of the accuracy and completeness of the tests. Margaret Goodearl and Ruth Ibarra witnessed at least five attempts to bypass the appropriate tests. In each incident when Goodearl would address the issue to upper management she was threatened with loss of her job. After Goodearl began to...

Words: 668 - Pages: 3

What’s in a Name? – Would Whistle-Blowing Be a More Acceptable Practice If It Was Called by Another Name? What Other Names Might It Be Called That Would Find Acceptance in Corporate Culture?

...What’s in a name? – Would whistle-blowing be a more acceptable practice if it was called by another name? What other names might it be called that would find acceptance in corporate culture? Organizations should use a more acceptable name to encourage employees to come forward with concerns or complaints of wrongdoings within the company. Whistle-blowing may be a strong incentive for some individuals. However, often both the whistle-blower and the individual involved in the wrongdoing are treated as suspect. Whether or not the allegations are eventually proven, both the whistle-blower and those accused of wrong doing pay a price. Corporate culture has the responsibility to provide employees with compliance policies that will assist them with programs and policies designed to encourage employees to raise safety concerns. Groups that have recently assumed or are considering assuming these forms of strategies which are commonly referred to as whistleblower policies stand to learn from establishments that have years of knowledge in initiating and refining them. A whistle-blower may innocently come forward with allegations against another, only to face severe scrutiny and charges of disloyalty. Some experts mention that more than 60 percent of whistle-blowers suffered at least one damaging result, for example being pressured to withdraw their charges, being ostracized by coworkers, and even being threatened with a lawsuit. Whistle-blowers can be fired and...

Words: 409 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blowing in a Government or Business

...Whistle Blowing in Government or in a Business To speak or keep silent, those are the two of many common issues that plays along with the ethical considerations and morale of a Whistle Blower. On the other hand, what if you saw fraudulent actions of someone, should you speak or keep quiet? What if the person doing the fraudulent actions was a friend or a high ranking official, should you speak or keep silent, these and many others are the complex situations that could happen within a business organization. Whistle blowing, which seems to become increasingly common as employees speak out about ethical concerns or illegal practices in the work place to the public or to authorities. “There is a great deal of evidence to suggest that whistle blowing is one of the most important sources of information or detecting and reducing illegal and unethical corporate behaviors” (Kohn 2011). In general, whistle blowers feel a need to report the incident in order to put a stop to the illegal or ethical concern in the business or to correct them from happening on a regular basis. In the past years, there have been a lot of cases where employees have decided to come up in public eye and expose the unethical behavior within their companies. There is no doubt that many unquestionable practices among business organizations are being committed daily. With all the recent cases of corporate fraud, companies now provide for internal rules to protect the whistle-blower against retaliation...

Words: 2572 - Pages: 11

Whistler Blowing

...Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Bianca Martin LEG 500 Law, Ethics & Corp. Governance Strayer University Professor: Keith S. Smith Whistleblowing Whistleblowing has come to describe a wide range of disclosures, both within organizations and outside organizations (Trevino, 2015). Whistleblowing empowers workers to speak up for principles and ethics and shine a light on unethical practices that can cause negative consequences for consumers, citizens and colleagues. Internal whistle blowing can be very valuable for an organization; reports of misconduct, given early and taken seriously, can prevent disaster (Trevino, 2015). Alternately, public whistle blowing has collapsed and shamed many organizations. Research suggests that it’s usually very difficult to report wrongdoing in organizations (Trevino, 2015). Among the main reasons people fail to report are fear of retaliation for reporting, and the belief that nothing will be done. Equally, those who do report say that they did so because they felt supported by managers and coworkers, they believed something would be done, and they were able to report anonymously (Trevino, 2015). For those who do report, most people prefer to handle issues within the organization before venturing outside, and most will go to their direct supervisor first (Trevino, 2015). Recently, protection for certain types of whistleblowing has increased with legislation such as the U.S. False Claims Act, Sarbanes-Oxley and the creation of...

Words: 730 - Pages: 3

Whistle Blowing - Good or Bad

...Introduction The purpose of this article is to increase awareness of the need for whistleblower policies for universities, governmental entities, and organizations. According to wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia, a whistleblower is a person who raises a concern about a wrongdoing occurring in an organization or body of people, usually this person would be from that same organization. Wikipedia states that whistle blowing is the disclosure to the public or to authorities, usually by an employee, of wrongdoing in a company or government department. Whistleblowing inside the workplace is the reporting, by employees or ex-employees, of wrongdoing such as fraud, malpractice, mismanagement, breach of health and safety law or any other illegal or unethical act, either on the part of management or by fellow employees, cited from wikipedia. A whistleblowing policy encourages staff to speak out if they have legitimate concerns about wrongdoings, as distinct from individual grievances, and establishes an accessible procedure for doing so. The policy may form part of a wider code of conduct. In order to encourage disclosure, many federal and state statutes prohibit employers from retaliating against an employee who files reports. The revealed misconduct may be classified in many ways; for example, a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health/safety violations, and corruption. Whistleblowers may make their allegations...

Words: 3871 - Pages: 16

Blowing the Whistle

...Blowing the Whistle Blowing the Whistle on Workplace Misconduct examines the corporate strategies that promote internal reporting when employees observe wrongdoing. Employees are more likely to blow the whistle on bad behavior when they feel good about their company and believe management has a strong commitment to ethical conduct. In 2009, more than six out of ten employees said they reported work place misconduct when they saw it. The share of workers who report negative behavior rose to 63 percent in 2009, a solid gain from 58 percent in 2007. Between 2000 and 2009 about 59 percent of employees on average said that they observed and reported misconduct, usually to an internal company authority. There is still much work to do because over the decade, four in ten employees who witnessed workplace misconduct did not typically report it. Some companies have linked ethical conduct to performance reviews to make it clear that good behavior is a job expectation. Other companies, believing that some workers do not report violations because they fear retaliation, and have set up hotlines that assure reporting can be done in private with less risk of being seen by a co-worker. Despite the prospect of retaliation, the data showed that most employees would rather report wrongdoing directly to somebody they know than to a hotline. Some employees believe their tips are more likely to be investigated when shared face-to-face instead of with a voicemail or an unfamiliar voice on...

Words: 435 - Pages: 2

Whistle-Blowing: Ethical Behavior

...Whistle-Blowing: Ethical Behavior Q 1. What recommendations for action would you make to the senior management to improve the productivity and atmosphere in company? 1. Appoint an ethically strong leader. 2. Appoint a leader who is professionally competent. 3. The leader should: - Manifest honesty - Pay attention to all stakeholders - Shows justice - Respect others - Serves others - Builds a trusting community. The company has falling business and people fear losing job. Mutual trust will reassure employs and improve productivity. 4. The company should: - Have a formal ethics policy, which should be implemented - Unethical conduct should be punished - Situations where unethical conduct is likely should be supervised - Avoid a competitive environment amongst employees - Avoid assigning difficult goals one after the other Q 2. Discuss the ethics of the new manager’s behaviour. 1. The manager’s ethics can be called “ethical egoism” i.e. his actions were for his personal benefit. Going on a holiday at the expense of a tenderer is grossly unethical. This act is against all ethical principles. It is against ethical principles of rights, justice, virtue and the utilitarian theory. Its consequences are not beneficial for anybody other than the manager himself. 2. The second unethical act of the manager was to go on inspection of a machine for which he was technically not qualified and then deciding to purchase a machine without appropriate...

Words: 462 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blowing

...------------------------------------------------- Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley LEG 500 LEG 500 Whistle blowing has its origins from an example of law enforcement blowing a whistle when someone finds a crime or some wrongdoing process in a government. So when wrongs are taking place in government, the public they serve suffers (Chambers, 2014). The government is supposed to be open. Whistleblowers have to care about the issues that are going on in the workplace for them to commit such energy into the act. They have ethics and morals. The whistle blower is passionate about their work and its proper execution (Chambers, 2014; Lowry, Moody, Galletta, & Vance, 2013). The recent case of September 2014, Katherine Mitchell, Paula Pedene, and Damien Reese brought to light the wrongdoing at Phoenix Veteran Affairs hospital where records on appointment data were falsified to hide delays in treatment. There was financial mismanagement in the agency which was later confirmed by the inspector general after the three exposed the issue (Hicks, 2014; Lee & Fargher, 2013). Paula was punished by the management because she spoke against financial mismanagement in the hospital. She was given a desk and a job in the basement. Katherine's supervisors tried to sabotage her career by giving her a position of overseeing quality of patient care. Given that the three were protected under the Sarbanes Oxley act, they were later promoted by the agency. In this...

Words: 874 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blowers : Saints or Sinners Whistle Blowing

...Case Study 1 I believe both whistle blowers and David Stetler thoughts are possible with today’s society and the different opinions of how people interpret situations. If a co-worker has studied the Attribution Theory in which determines whether a persons intentions are internally or externally caused. Self prophecy whistle blower who honestly believes in justice being served would be eager to collect evidence and make sure all evidence is full proof. By frivolous lawsuits occurring whistle blowers who has valid claims would have to make sure: Their story is legit with NO wholes in it for companies to redeem themselves by being able to accuse “one” of lying upon the company. I feel as long as the story is solid and all evidence is there why would “one” not come forth with the information against the company. Whistle blowers claims will be carefully and thoroughly evaluated to make sure everything being presented are facts toward the company To prevent frivolous lawsuits companies and governments should have their own private investigator to do research with personal documentation instead of relying upon the whistle blowers information along. Companies and governments then would be able to catch when or even before fraudulent activities begin. Employees should do what they feel is right for their situation at hand. The disadvantage......

Words: 340 - Pages: 2