Premium Essay

Who Is A Tragic Hero In The Crucible

Submitted By
Words 887
Pages 4
Charlie Chaplin is a Communist (Biography.com staff; Andrew). Multiple other renowned actors, screenwriters, and directors were accused just like this during the Red Scare (Andrew). Miller created The Crucible during this time of paranoia (Hosey). In the 1950s and 1940s, after the Cold War, Russia became a direct representation of everything anti-American, thus Communism was anti-American (History.com staff). The House of Un-American Activities Committee was created to rid America of Communist (History.com staff). McCarthy lead this extirpation and exacerbated the situation to a point of utter chaos and paranoia called the Red Scare (History.com staff; Hosey). This campaign began with an attack at the liberal Hollywood, blacklisting of Hollywood …show more content…
Proctor meets the first criteria of a tragic hero, noble birth, by Miller himself stating, “Proctor, respected and even feared in Salem” (Miller 1). For Proctor to even begin his fall as a tragic hero, he must first be in a position of social and moral power, of noble birth. Having social and moral power in the village of Salem allows him the ability to later gather signatures from the villagers for a deposition that will release the accused (Miller 3).With the high position secured, the tragic hero, now, falls. Hamartia, the hero’s tragic flaw, causes this fall. In a Puritan society, flaws equate to sin (Hosey). Proctor commits the sin of adultery, therefore his flaw is lust. Proctor says himself, “God help me, I lusted…” (Miller 3). Despite having commit such a vile sin, John Proctor is able to escape the consequences due to his powerful position. Thus, he fulfills the third criteria of a tragic hero, hubris. He displays his ability when he warns Abigail Williams, the accomplice of his lustful sin, to not speak of it, “Wipe it out of mind. We never touched, Abigail” (Miller 1). By refusing to speak of it himself and preventing others to, Proctor is attempting to escape the consequences of his crime by denying the crime itself. Proctor continues his attempt by scolding his wife to get over his affair (Miller 2). …show more content…
John’s fall into his tragic end truly begins with the criteria of peripeteia. Proctor’s flaw brings him from a high position of power to one of an accused witch. During a trial, Proctor attempts to make Mary Warren confess that Abigail and the other girls are only pretending, to end the witch trials and save the innocents accused, but Abigail begins manipulating the situation and reducing the validity of Mary Warren’s words (Miller 3). Proctor sensing this, attempts to gain back power by reducing Abigail’s. He confesses and yells at Abigail, “How do you call Heaven! Whore! Whore!” (Miller 3). Cheever, the court clerk, brings Elizabeth in to validify the confession, but she rejects it (Miller 3). Abigail’s manipulation continues, taunting Mary Warren’s words (Miller 3). Mary Warren, eventually, succumbs to Abigail’s power (Miller 3). In turning to Abigail's’ side, she attacks Proctor, accusing him of being with the Devil (Miller 3). Thus the court arrests Proctor, and he has fallen (Miller 3). Before having fallen, Proctor remained in denial, but, due to this fall, he has an epiphany. He realizes his actions do have consequences that even delaying acceptance can exacerbate the consequences. Therefore, Proctor meets the fourth criteria of a tragic hero, realizing his downfall is his to blame, anagnorisis. Proctor shows recognition by telling Elizabeth he does not deserve to be hanged like the saint, Rebecca Nurse,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

John Proctor Tragic Hero Essay

...Truly the Tragic Hero “Behind every exquisite thing that existed, there was something tragic.” A quote from Oscar Wilde, a playwright and novelist speaking about the main character, in his book “The Picture of Dorian Gray.” The definition of a tragic hero involves a literary character who makes an error that leads to their own destruction, but eventually changes for the better. John Proctor is no hero, but a tragic hero. John is considered a tragic hero due to a tragic flaw, his free choice, and the punishment he receives which exceeds his crime. Behind every beauty there is a flaw, leading to the definition of John Proctor. John Proctor is a typical man during the time of the Crucible with a wife and three kids. He is a decent Christian and a hard worker. His flaws are his lust and unwillingness to forgive himself. Proctors lusts of Abigail which leads to an affair between the two, and leaves Abigail broken hearted to be left by Proctor, causes a large amount of trouble in the story. This lust causes many troubles including the other hamartia of Proctor not able to forgive himself. This lust for Abigail causes Proctor to have a large weight on his shoulders...

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Common Man In The Crucible

...Arthur Miller wrote his essay titled “Tragedy and the Common Man” in 1949. This essay explains Miller’s definition of a tragic hero as well as why a common man has as much ability to be the hero of a tragedy as someone of nobility. The Crucible is a play written by Arthur Miller in 1953 that dramatizes the Salem witch trials of the late seventeenth century in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In the play, the town of Salem falls into hysteria after Reverend Parris finds his daughter, niece, and their friends dancing in the woods with his slave Tituba. The young girls claim they have been bewitched by people in the town to avoid punishment, although, the punishment then comes for the accused regardless of their innocence. A vital character to the...

Words: 948 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Crucible John Proctor Character Analysis

...In the book, and play, The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, there is tragic elements such as a tragic hero.The tragic hero in this story is John Proctor. This is because John displays all the qualities of being a tragic hero, such as a tragic flaw. Tragic heroes are supposed to arouse pity and fear in the reader or audience. John Proctor shows all qualities which are: mighty figure, reversal of fortune, Uncommon suffering, recognizes the consequences of his actions, and his plight ennobles the reader. John Proctor is a mighty figure because he had helped to build the church. In the Book John had said “I nailed the roof upon the church, I hung the door,” (Miller 32). This shows how, in the theocracy the live in, which is a government run by religion, John would be a mighty figure. It also shows how it leads to his downfall, and his recognizing of his actions. This is because he is so full of pride that he thinks no one will suspect him, and he can get away with adultery. Also in the book John says “ How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name,” (Miller 62). This shows how John has recognized his mistakes, and is recognizing...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reverend Hale Character Analysis Essay

...Characterization of Reverend John Hale Throughout The Crucible, Arthur Miller uses the characterization of an archetypal hero, Reverend John Hale, to reveal how when arrogant and nationalistic pride becomes involved even the most intelligent and moral man’s moral compass can be distorted. This universal truth and Hale’s archetypal characteristics were revealed by Miller to reprehend those who fell into McCarthyism and the flaws in the American society in the nineteen-fifties, which were impacts of their blinded morals. To comprehend the idea of this specific universal truth, one first must understand Hale’s characterization through Aristotle’s archetypal hero traits. The first criteria, Noble...

Words: 1688 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Crucible John Proctor Tragic Hero

...In the book The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor emerges as a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a person who makes a judgement that eventually leads to his or her downfall. Romeo is famous for being a tragic hero in the play, Romeo and Juliet. John Proctor is a tragic hero because he is lustful, hypocritical, and highly respected. John Proctor reveals himself as a tragic hero for being lustful. He had an affair with Abigail. Abigail says, “I know you clutched my back behind your house and sweated like a stallion whenever I come near!” (Miller 21). This means that Proctor could not control himself around Abigail. Because he got caught, he stopped seeing Abigail. If Proctor would have never been caught, who is to say that he would have stopped the affair? John Proctor is a tragic hero for being lustful towards Abigail. John Proctor proves himself as a tragic hero for being hypocritical. He says he is faithful man, but he did not know all Ten Commandments. Elizabeth helped him out with the Commandments and Proctor said, “You see, sir, between the two of us we do know them all” (Miller 64). Proctor can not prove himself as a Christian in a serious situation and never shows up in church. He says he is always working on the farm. It leaves him with a bad name and not a very good impression. John Proctor’s tragic...

Words: 422 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Crucible

...Meghan Marasti Ms. Kelly Survey of American Literature 16 October 2015 The Crucible Analytical Paper “It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it,” Benjamin Franklin once said. Reputation has a large impact on the citizens of Salem, Massachusetts in the play, The Crucible. John Proctor is most affected by the thought of maintaining an acceptable reputation for his name. Throughout The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, John Proctor made many mistakes, one such as committing adultery, which made his wife, Elizabeth Proctor, lose his trust. Although he made mistakes, the town still saw John as a respectable man who cared immensely for his family. In the end, John did admit his sin of adultery and was hanged. Through “Aristotle’s Poetics” it is proved that John Proctor is the tragic hero of The Crucible because his true character comes out and he becomes a good man in the end by admitting to his wrong-doings, committing adultery, in order to save his reputation and family. John Proctor ruins his reputation within the change of fortune, or catastrophe, appeal  of “Aristotle’s Poetics”. A change of fortune is explained as “occurs when a character produces an effect opposite to that which he intended to produce…”(McManus). John Proctor did not want his reputation ruined or his relationship with his wife ruined, however the complete opposite happened to him creating a major problem. The change of fortune is when John is finally forced to admit to...

Words: 1043 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

John Proctor Tragic Hero Characteristics

...A tragic hero is a person who has heroic qualities and is fated by the Gods or by some supernatural force for doom or at least to great suffering. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, Salem was in a period of time where witch hunts were frequent which created chaos throughout the town. These witch hunts often targeted innocent, hard working people who were accused of witchery with no actual evidence. As a result when this conflict introduced itself to John Proctor, he exhibited tragic hero traits such as pride, catharsis, and nobleness. Pride plays an interesting role in the life of John Proctor in The Crucible. During the trials, Proctor daily wages an internal, war between his conscience and pride. His prideful mindset is what primarily caused his downfall; a person who rises and falls because of their own ignorant flaw, which is the true meaning of a tragic hero. Therefore there are several traits that exemplify a tragic hero in John...

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

John Proctor As A Tragic Hero In The Crucible By Arthur Miller

...In literature a tragic hero is someone who tends to play a major role in the story, and eventually gets pulled into a downfall by their tragic flaw. In “The Crucible” John Proctor can be seen as one of multiple tragic heroes through his constant appearance in the story, and like any other tragic hero has a flaw leading to his downfall. Therefore John Proctor is a tragic hero; one of the most memorable in the entire play. John Proctor’s wife, Elizabeth Proctor, would have been a community member who exposed John’s flaws. One of the few things holding John back from being the perfect hero was his past with Abigail. As a result of his adultery crime, John had too much pride to admit to the crime until Elizabeth’s life was on the line. Elizabeth...

Words: 255 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Crucible: Is John Proctor Truly A Tragic Hero

...Divya Kumar Mr. Kirley ENG3U1-05 November.11.2015. The Crucible: Is John Proctor truly a tragic hero? A tragic hero is a person with admirable qualities yet they have a tragic flaw that leads them to their downfall. In Miller’s play “The Crucible,” the protagonist, John Proctor, is a tragic hero known for his good reputation yet commits adultery with Abigail thus making it a tragic flaw that leads to his death. John Proctor is a tragic hero because he is a well-mannered person that has a good reputation. John strongly believes in Elizabeth’s good morals by proving his honesty and bond towards Elizabeth and speaks up for her as he tries to get her and his friends’ wives out of jail. He tells Danforth...

Words: 1085 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Crucible: John Proctor As A Tragic Hero

...What defines a man as a failure, and what describes a man as a tragic hero on par with the great greek heroes such as Oedipus? The qualities of a tragic hero, that of which people have studied for decades, have such a strict set of rules that define a tragic hero that there doesn’t seem to be any modern or “common” tragic heroes. Although Aristotle dictates that a tragic hero must be of noble birth, John Proctor demonstrates more qualities of a tragic hero than he does not, therefore John Proctor is best understood as a tragic hero. John Proctor, the protagonist in The Crucible, who was seen as a highly renowned man in his society, saw error in his ways despite his affair with Abigail. He knew what he did was far from forgivable and acknowledged himself as a sinner. Even despite the fact that he cheated on his wife, Elizabeth still saw him as a man of justice and honor and pleaded with him to end the trouble that he inadvertently started with Abigail. Elizabeth says, “Then go and tell her she’s a whore. Whatever promise she may sense--break it, John, break it,” (Miller 62). Elizabeth still knows that John is a...

Words: 939 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

John Proctor Tragic Hero Analysis

...Lauren Barash Mrs. Dachille ELA: Hour 4 25 November 2014 John Proctor Tragic Hero A tragic hero is one who holds a high status in a community. The protagonist habitually faces a supernatural force of misfortune in which they conquer and gain admiration from the audience. In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, John Proctor was not the ordinary resident living in the small town of Salem, Massachusetts. Salem during this time period embodies pure unintelligence. The community faced ruthless weather, deceased crops, and sickness. They didn’t know how these dreadful happenings arose. The only knowledge they had came from books, which did not contain the solutions for their troubles. The idea of witchcraft was proposed, and with this being the only possible...

Words: 1180 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Tragic Hero Cricible

...wrote The Crucible in 1953 during the McCarthy Era, when Americans were accusing each other of Pro-Communist beliefs.  Many of Miller’s friends were being attacked as communists and Miller himself was brought up guilty of beliefs in communism. Miller was getting sick of this so he put his writing techniques in action and wrote a play called The Crucible to show the injustices. This playwright uses the Salem Witch trials as an allegory to the US injustices toward suspected Communists. The Crucible is set against the backdrop of the mad witch hunts of the Salem witch trials, where innocent people were being accused and hung because of witchcraft. Miller portrays a character that is known as a tragic hero, strong but flawed, to fight against the injustice of the town and to show that a tragic hero can still do what he believes is best even when the majority of society is influenced by lies. The character that Miller chooses to be his Greek tragic hero is John Proctor, who is a good, well known, and respected man in Salem. It is evident that John Proctor fulfills the requirements of the Greek Tragic hero because of his many positive traits, such as his noble characteristics, his honorable and righteous qualities, and always believing in himself fighting for what is true. However, he had a fatal flaw that showed the darker side to his perfect characteristics. His flaw is committing adultery towards his wife. Before the play began, Proctor’s lust for Abigail Williams, who was once...

Words: 1044 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why Is John Proctor Ideal In The Crucible

...that John Proctor is the tragic hero of the Crucible and that his decision to choose principle over self preservation was an honorable act with the goal of affirming his goodness before God. In the second act of the Crucible, the audience first meets the character of John Proctor while he is in his home with his wife Elizabeth. The reader’s initial reaction of Proctor is that he is a benevolent husband as he states “I mean to please you Elizabeth” (50) and is otherwise kind and respectful towards his wife. However, as the act progresses, the reader comes to find out...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

John Proctor Hero

...When thinking of a hero, many people begin to imagine a strong, courageous character who seeks victory. John Proctor, a character in The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, possesses many of these qualities during the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Despite this, the factor that makes him a tragic hero is his inevitable tragic flaw. A tragic hero is an essential character in a play that is destined to experience a tragic downfall. Although Proctor pursues many good actions with ethical intent, his mistakes, pride, and sorrowful downfall, automatically set him up for failure, making him a tragic hero. One main component that contributes to John Proctors’ decline is his realization of the irreversible mistake he made. John Proctor made the mistake...

Words: 647 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Eng3U the Crucible Critical Analysis

...The Crucible Critical Analysis Shakespeare believes that a tragic hero has potential for greatness, but is ultimately destined to fail. The character falls from greatness because of their ‘tragic flaw’. In Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible, the protagonist John Proctor is portrayed as the tragic hero. He fits this description for a number of reasons. His tragic flaw or Achilles heel, like many other tragic heroes is his pride. Compounded with conflicts with circumstances, this tragic flaw leads to Proctor’s loss of life and arguably the loss of his eternal life as well. One of the major requirements to being a Shakespearean tragic hero includes having a tragic flaw. Proctor places a great deal of importance on his pride or what he considers dignity and self-respect. He lets pride overshadow his life and actions. He would rather maintain his pride or die. As the play nears its end in Act Four, it shows that he would rather give up his life, rather than post his fake confession on the church doors for the public to see. He states, “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life... How may I live without my name? I have given my soul; Leave me my name!” (Miller, 133). John is too prideful and unwilling to stain his reputation. He prefers to die rather than have his name stained because of a fake confession. He wants to leave his name intact for his family. Another example of this is illustrated in Act Two, where Elizabeth urges Proctor to go...

Words: 1106 - Pages: 5