Premium Essay

Who Is Hauchecome Guilty

Submitted By
Words 619
Pages 3
Throughout the story “A Piece of String” by Guy de Maupassant, Hauchecome works tirelessly, but is still not able to convince people he is innocent of a crime. In the story, Hauchecome picks up a piece of string off the ground, thinking it could be of some worth. While doing so, he is spotted by his enemy, Maitre Malandain, who reports him for stealing a missing pocketbook. Later, the pocketbook is returned, but the townspeople still believe Hauchecome is guilty. They believe that he is at least an accomplice in the crime, if not directly tied to it. Also, they do not believe his excuse of picking up a piece of string on the ground seriously, and think that it is just a bad cover up story. Hauchecome is not able to convince people that he is innocent of a crime because they believe that he has a part to …show more content…
As Hauchecome is in the Mayor’s office, he pleads that he picked up a piece of string, not a pocketbook. He claims to have done this because he is poor, and thought it could be of some worth to him. The townspeople hear of this, and see it as a bad excuse to try to cover up his crime. One townsman talking to Hauchecome says “Come, come, old sharper, that's an old trick; I know all about you piece of string” (Maupassant, 138). The quote shows that the townsman believes that Hauchecome had to come up with an excuse for picking something off the ground, and mocks him by recalling Hauchecome’s piece of string story. The townsman views the story as a joke, and thinks that there is no way Hauchecome would bend over just to pick up a piece of string that has next to no worth. On the other hand, Hauchecome tries to argue that he is poor, and the string could be of some worth to him. However, they infer that since Hauchecome is poor, he likely would do anything for extra money, and would not care about some piece of

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Literature

...Necklace," both by Guy de Mauspassant, are very alike and yet very similar in certain aspects as well. The main character in "The Piece of String," Maitre Hauchecome, resembles Madame Loisel from "The Necklace" in a number of ways. Both are the protagonist of the story. Maitre Hauchecome was accused of stealing a pocketbook from someone and Madame Loisel lost her friend’s expensive diamond necklace. In both cases, the characters do not have an item they should have had in their possession or accused of having. Nevertheless, Maitre Hauchecome is angered when he realizes that nobody believes him for not having the missing item with him, while Madame Loisel feels deep distress and anxiety about loosing her item. Maitre Hauchecome also somewhat acts like Monsieur Loisel because he appears to be a caring, gentle, poor man who tries to please people. The characters reacted to their situations differently. In "The Piece of String," Maitre Fortune Houlbreque resembles Madame Forestier in "The Necklace" because Maitre Fortune Houlbreque lost a pocketbook and Madame Forestier’s friend lost her diamond necklace; both characters were missing an item. Also, Maitre Malandain from "The Piece of String" and Monsieur Loisel from "The Necklace" are characters who are quite different; Maitre Malandain told people that Maitre Hauchecome was guilty of the crime against him; he didn’t want to help him at all. Monsieur Loisel bent over backwards to help find the diamond necklace her wife lost and even...

Words: 1766 - Pages: 8