Premium Essay

Why Is Julius Caesar Bad

Submitted By
Words 546
Pages 3
Julius Caesar is one of the most well known leaders of Rome. But was he a good leader that helped Rome with its problems or was he just a power hungry individual who only cared about being praised? Julius Caesar in general is a pretty controversial person in history because he did do things that were both good and bad. However, if you look at both, the good he did to and for Rome wasn’t your ordinary things. He is the one of the greatest military minds and he helped start the evolution of an ordinary Roman Republic into a strong Roman Empire. Frankly though, to actually get the full picture of the many great things he did for Rome though, you would have to start at the beginning. The Great Julius Caesar was born into a patrician family and was a nephew of famous Roman general, Marius. After the death of Marius, his life kinda takes a turn, but in early 60 B.C. he creates his own political career and military as well. Because of his success with his new “pastime”, he campaigned for consulship in 60 B.C. and was …show more content…
The conquest went through several battles in northern Gaul and the crossing of the Rhine over a trestle bridge constructed by Roman engineers. In the years 55 and 54 B.C., Caesar went across the English Channel and conquered the land along the Rhine in Gaul by preventing a Celtic attack from across the Channel. Then Caesar, at the time drawn into an affair with Cleopatra in Egypt, finally had to fight two more battles, one in North Africa and another in Spain. With all the success that he had all over the Mediterranean, this great leader was assassinated by political rivals of the Senate on the Ides of March in 44 B.C. Which for many people in Rome was shocking and tragic so they revolted against the Senate which started another War. But, in his existence, he was remembered by his boldness, decisiveness, and his great leadership in

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Marcus Brutus As A Tragic Hero

...downfall. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, there are many arguments over who is the tragic hero. Some people say it is Marcus Brutus. Others say that it is Julius Caesar. After examining these two options, a solution has been made. Brutus is the tragic hero because he possesses such heroic qualities and dies at the end of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus deserves the title tragic hero for many reasons. First is because Brutus is a noble man. He never deceives anyone in the play. Even though he was part of the conspiracy and killed Julius Caesar, he did it for the benefit of Rome. Brutus stated: “if then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (870). Brutus did everything for the benefit of someone else. Brutus was a noble man and he cared about others more than himself. Another example of this is when Brutus did not tell Portia his plans to murder Caesar because he felt it would stress her even more in Act two, Scene one. Brutus was a noble man....

Words: 565 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Persuasive Essay

...25.16 If There Wasn’t A Julius Caesar I believe if Brutus wasn’t in the story, it wouldn’t be called Julius Caesar, it would be called something like Mark Antony. Julius Caesar is one of the main characters, if he wasn’t in the story and basically the ruler, it would probably be Brutus or maybe even Antony. Julius Caesar plays one of the most important roles, in this play. But to me, the play is better off without him. I think Antony would be a better leader, he would have more control in everyone, but he also would help everyone out, and have more respect towards others. Caesar was stabbed by multiple conspirators, but Cassius was the first to stab, and Brutus was the very last to stab. Caesar seems to abuse everything he has, he abused all his powers away, he no longer has them. This is why people don’t want to get along with him, he accuses them of everything and he also doesn’t care about their actions or any part of...

Words: 790 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

...Characteristics of a noble man include being ethical, patriotic, reasonable, and showing selflessness. Being a good orator, but not a good man lies beneath the speeches of Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony. In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Caesar’s friends are faced by an equal amount of hatred from the Plebeians with the aftermath of respected Julius Caesar’s death. There is a great struggle for the title of the noblest Roman between Brutus and Antony to reveal the most powerful and honorable man. The speedy fight for power are exposed quickly from each side of these Roman figures. After the assassination of Caesar, both Antony and Brutus relay speeches at the funeral that contain a significant amount of rhetorical techniques to their audience....

Words: 1024 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Essay

...The Tragedy of Julius Caesar tells of the conspiracy and the murder of one the most prominent figures in Roman history, Julius Caesar. The play written by William Shakespeare, shows the relationships between the conspiracy members, more specifically Marcus Brutus. He comes from noble ancestry and is a politician in the Roman capital. One of Shakespeare’s most used ideas in his plays is the idea of a tragic hero. A tragic hero is a character usually of noble birth and has a tragic flaw. Shakespeare uses Brutus and not Caesar as the tragic hero. To fit the criteria of a Shakespearean tragic hero the character must be a person of noble birth and have a tragic flaw. Brutus has an ancestor who is of noble importance. Lucius Junius Brutus was the...

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Essay: Betrayal In Julius Ceasar

...little bit of the spotlight” (Conrad). Julius Caesar and Brutus were considered good friends. LeBron James was basically made into a superstar from the Cleveland Cavaliers. The relationship between the two groups will be explained in detail. Furthermore, their similarities and differences will be expressed using proper evidence. Also, despite Caesar and Brutus being from a complete different generation than the modern day, betrayal still has the same effect on an individual. To begin, Julius Caesar was one of the greatest leaders in Roman history who was assassinated by a group of conspirators because they were afraid he would become a tyrant. Marullus, who does not...

Words: 2312 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Foreshadowing In Animal Farm And Julius Caesar

...Foreshadowing is a literary device in which a writer gives an advance hint of what is to come later in the story. ("Definition of Foreshadowing." Literary Devices. N.p., 2016. Web. 11 Dec. 2016. ) The novella Animal Farm written by George Orwell and the tragic play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare display various examples of foreshadowing that illustrates future events that happen later in these stories. In Animal Farm, George Orwell foreshadows the pigs’ gradual abuse of their power. “Never mind the milk, comrades!” cried Napoleon, placing himself in front of the buckets. “That will be attended to. The harvest is more important. Comrade Snowball will lead the way. I shall follow in a few minutes. Forward, comrades! The hay is waiting.So the animals trooped down to the hayfield to begin the harvest, and when they came back in the evening it was noticed that the milk had disappeared” (Orwell, 26). The animal’s had wondered what to do with the extra milk and tried to discuss it, but Napoleon, the pig, told them that it wasn't important compared to the harvest. Napoleon told the animals to follow Snowball and he would be with them, but once the animals had returned for the evening the milk was gone, implying Napoleon took it or did something with it. The soon betrayal of the hard working horse, Boxer is foreshadowed after the attacks Napoleon made. “To the amazement of everybody, three of them flung themselves upon Boxer. Boxer saw them coming and put out his great hoof...

Words: 1216 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Julius Caesar

...Composers of texts often seek to present their opinions in such a way that influences the responder to agree or empathise with the composer. In both Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Shekhar Kapur’s Elizabeth, the composers’ perspectives on these historical figures and events are portrayed in unique ways which contradict and are contradicted by perspectives from other sources. Reasons for these differences can include the form of text and context of the composer, both of which affect not only the composer’s perspective, but the way in which they present it. Both Julius Caesar and Elizabeth are forms of text which serve primarily to entertain the audience. Even supposedly ‘historical’ plays and films do not have to adhere strictly to the ‘facts’ of history, but often stray from such accuracy in order to enhance entertainment value. For this reason, the viewpoint they may present on historical events or personalities can often conflict with accounts from other, more strictly historical, sources. For example, Julius Caesar was largely based off and echoes Plutarch’s Life of Caesar, and yet the two differ notably in many respects, such as the depiction of the funeral oratories given by Brutus and Antony. In Plutarch’s history, events are recounted very drily and matter-of-fact: “Brutus… came down from the capitol, and spoke to the people.” There is no direct quotation, details of the speech, or emotive language. Shakespeare on the other hand has both men give a detailed and well-crafted...

Words: 2229 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar

...Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare William Shakespeare Renowned English poet, playwright and actor William Shakespeare’s birth date is not known; however, he is said to have been baptized on the 26th of April 1564. He died on the 26th of April 1616 but not before he had written about 38 plays, 154 sonnets and other literary pieces. Shakespeare’s plays have been translated into several languages over the years and have been produced in many forms throughout the ages. The Play Julius Caesar is a play about friendship, betrayal and power. The play is a historical tragedy as it presents the biography of one of the greatest man to have ever lived in Rome. Caesar was made Dictator and Consol after he chased Pompey and his forces out of Rome in an attempt to obtain ultimate power. Caesar’s ultimate goal was to become Rome’s first king and he remained focus on this goal until his death in 44BC. His death was as a result of fate and his refusal to acknowledge the many signs and omens that foreshadowed his fall. Brutus a very good friend of Caesar also took part in his assassination. Brutus feared that Caesar would become a tyrant and harm the people of Rome. In an attempt to ‘save’ the people Brutus helped Cassius to take Caesar’s life. After Caesar’s death he is avenged by his loyal servant Antony who skillfully manipulates his way into the band of conspirators. Later, after winning the love of the people Antony pursues and conquers Brutus’ and Cassius’ forces...

Words: 4055 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Brutus Funeral Speech In Julius Caesar

...From Julius Caesar’s death, his close killer spoke better at his funeral compared to Caesar’s right hand man. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Caesar was violently killed by a conspiracy group and had his funeral a few hours later. The people who spoke at his funeral was Brutus, his best friend but also one of the many who stabbed him, and then Antony, who was his loyal partner and right hand man. Brutus gave the better funeral speech because he gave valid information and backed up his reasons. Brutus provided his reasonings to why he helped kill Caesar but he also showed Caesar in a positive light. The better funeral speech was made by Brutus as he claimed himself for his reasonings and beliefs. Brutus backed up his reasoning for stabbing his best friend,...

Words: 896 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Julius Caeser Better Leader

...Mohid Rizwan Mr. Bennett ENG-2D0 14 November 2012 Julius Caesar Essay “A leader is someone who knows the way, shows the way, and goes the way.” Cassius is a better judge of character, Brutus makes mistakes, and Cassius is a better general. These reasons help explain why Cassius is a better leader than Brutus. First of all, Cassius is a better judge of character. When Brutus gives Mark Antony permission to speak at Julius Caesar’s funeral, Cassius says, Brutus, a word with you You know not what you do; do not Consent That Antony speak in his funeral. Know you how much the people may be moved By that which he will utter? (III, i, 232-234) This quote suggests that Cassius does not trust Antony. He knows that Antony is going to manipulate the mob against the conspirators. Overall, he judges Antony’s character well. On the other hand, Brutus makes mistakes. One of the most crucial mistakes he makes is when he lets Antony speak at the funeral, even though Cassius warns him not to. When Cassius tells Brutus not to let Antony speak at the funeral, Brutus replies, What Antony shall speak, I will protest He speaks by leave and by permission, And that we are contented Caesar shall Have all true rites and lawful ceremonies. It shall advantage us more than do us wrong. (III, i, 238-242) The quote suggests that Brutus lets Antony speak at the funeral, thinking that it will do the conspirators well. However, letting Antony speak, was his worst...

Words: 479 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

...At the mourning of Julius Caesar's death, both Antony and Brutus gave very compelling speeches with different uses of ethos, pathos, and logos but Antony's was more persuasive towards the crowd. Each hit several points and got the crowd going however Antony's speech convinced the crowd that " hated " Caesar to adore him again. Ethos is the building up of credibility of a speaker to coax the audience to trust in the more. Brutus started his speech with, " Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent that you may hear. Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. " In these statements, Brutus is attempting to entice the listeners to believe in his story because he is a public figure. On the other hand, Antony proclaims, " he was my friend, faithful and just to...

Words: 495 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar Analysis W/ Study Questions

...Julius Caesar full title  ·  The Tragedy of Julius Caesar author  · William Shakespeare type of work  · Play genre  · Tragic drama, historical drama language  · English time and place written  ·  1599, in London date of first publication  · Published in the First Folio of 1623, probably from the theater company’s official promptbook rather than from Shakespeare’s manuscript publisher  · Edward Blount and William Jaggard headed the group of five men who undertook the publication of Shakespeare’s First Folio narrator  · None climax  · Cassius’s death (V.iii), upon ordering his servant, Pindarus, to stab him, marks the point at which it becomes clear that the murdered Caesar has been avenged, and that Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators have lost in their attempt to keep Rome a republic rather than an empire. Ironically, the conspirators’ defeat is not yet as certain as Cassius believes, but his death helps bring about defeat for his side. protagonists  · Brutus and Cassius antagonists  · Antony and Octavius setting (time)  ·  44 b.c. setting (place)  · Ancient Rome, toward the end of the Roman republic point of view  · The play sustains no single point of view; however, the audience acquires the most insight into Brutus’s mind over the course of the action falling action  · Titinius’ realization that Cassius has died wrongly assuming defeat; Titinius’ suicide; Brutus’s discovery of the two corpses; the final struggle between Brutus’s men and the troops...

Words: 22331 - Pages: 90

Premium Essay

Was Julius Caesar Justified In Brutus's Speech

...In (Act III, scene ii) of Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus, one of the conspirators in the plot to kill Caesar, makes a case to justify why this noble man had to die. After this speech, Caesar’s errand boy Antony, goes to speak about Caesar and pay his respects for the crowd. But while reading his speech, his true intentions are revealed. Despite saying he would not, he argues against Brutus, pitting the crowd against him. What caused Antony to triumph over Brutus? What did he do different that was better than Brutus’s speech? This is an analysis on Brutus’s speech, and what he succeeded, and failed to do with it. Brutus gave the audience zero evidence on why Caesar had to die. He cites his ambition, but is ambition really bad? “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him; as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was valiant, I honor him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him.” (Anderson, 831) Brutus is also incredibly vague in his speech, and overestimates his audience. He thought they were capable of higher order thinking despite the mob mentality. Brutus is naive as well, believing that just because he is honorable and honest, so too will everyone...

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Was Julius Caesar Honorable

...those who deserve it, which makes it so special. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, the characters are concerned with gaining honor reputation to accelerate their reputation. Jealousy is brought upon most of the conspirators who feel as though mighty Caesar isn’t worthy of his honor. They secretly devise a plan that not only ruin Caesar, but named themselves to be honorable. From their motives to their actions, the conspirators did whatever it took to get the love from the Romans they’ve always wanted. This is why the idea of being honorable was an important and valued characteristic to the characters....

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Julius Caesar

...Julius Caesar Scrapbook Brutus By Carleigh Gifford For Mr. Young English Tuesday, November 8th, 2011 Act 1 Dear Diary, Caesar has returned from his victorious battle against Pompei. All of the commoners of Rome welcome Caesar back with great joy because they love him. On the other hand, I heard that the tribunes were very unhappy that Caesar was back and that they were destroying all of the decorations that were made to honour him. When Caesar entered with all of his friends, he was warned by the soothsayer to beware of the ides of March. After hearing the crowd go wild, Casca informed Cassius and I that Caesar was offered the crown three times and refused it all three times. This confused me a little bit because I know how much Caesar wanted to be emperor of Rome. I want to put some thought into my decision to make sure I do the right thing. This evening, the weather was very strange and violent. Everyone thought that it was a bad sign, but Cassius truly believed that it was to scare off Caesar and that no one else should take it as seriously. I can’t sleep, because I can’t get what Cassius had said to me, off my mind. Is killing Caesar really for the good of Rome? Brutus Act 2 Dear Diary, Today I have decided to agree with Cassius that killing Caesar would be the right thing to do. I’m only agreeing to this because I truly believe that murdering Caesar would be for the good of Rome. If the conspirators and I don’t kill him...

Words: 1680 - Pages: 7