Premium Essay

Workethics

In:

Submitted By jay101
Words 320
Pages 2
History of Employment Discrimination Law
Protections against employment discrimination are strictly statutory. Common law afforded employees no protection against discrimination. Indeed, common law viewed the entire employment relationship as a private contractual matter that should be free from judicial interference.1
Notwithstanding the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1870, the first effective antidiscrimination employment statute was a long time in coming. The first fed- eral legislation to deal directly with the issue of discrimination was the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (see Chapter 18 for more details). The statutory right to equality was expanded beyond the issue of pay less than a year later by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII is the basis for discrimination law and judicial deci- sions in such matters. Although it has been amended many times, its basic purpose is to prohibit discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Title VII was first amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972. This amendment gave the act’s enforcer, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), greater powers—for example, the right to file suits in federal district court. In 1975, Title VII was again amended, with the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which defined “sex” discrimination to include discrimination on the basis of pregnancy and childbirth.
Laws have also been enacted to protect against discrimination because of age or handicap. Discrimination on the basis of age was prohibited by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (discussed later in this chapter). Under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, federal contractors are prohibited from discriminating against certain employees in performing their contracts. With the Americans with Disabilities Act, passed in 1990, employers of 15 or more

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Are Third Worldcountries the Losers of Globalisation

...Are Third WorldCountries the Losers of Globalisation Page 1 Dennis DamerAre Third World Countries The Losers1/10of Globalisation? Are Third WorldCountries the Losers of Globalisation? Economics Term PaperBy Dennis DamerSS 2002 Content: Page 1. Introduction 22. What is Globalisation? 33. The Origins of Globalisation 34. The Third World 4a. African 4b. Asia 5c. Latin America6d. Russia 75. Globalisation - the Culprit? 76. Bibliography 97. Notes 9 Page 2 Dennis DamerAre Third World Countries The Losers2/10of Globalisation? Introduction Today more than a billion people areliving in extreme poverty having lessthan one dollar a day at their disposalto live or merely to survive. Moreover,until 2015 the world’s population willlikely have grown to 7 billion1. Add tothat 58 million HIV/Aids infectionslargely in the third world countries andmore specifically, Africa.Despite constant lamentation aboutextortionate taxes and poverty inwestern countries Europe, NorthAmerica and part of Asia is wealthierthan ever in the history of mankind.Investors from Europe put their moneyto work in countries around the world.Wal Mart recently announced $220billion in sales for 2001 making itbigger than the economies ofIndonesia, South Africa or Turkey².In the last two decades internationalflows of capital, goods, services,information and labour increased involume and accelerated substantially.In some industries national boundariesbecame obsolete, like remnants of a NGOs and pressure groups...

Words: 2482 - Pages: 10