Free Essay

Zzzz Best Company

In: Business and Management

Submitted By amzzbee29
Words 3832
Pages 16
CASE 1.9

ZZZZ Best Company, \nc.

On May 19,1987, a short article in The Wall Street Journal reported that ZZZZ Best Company, Inc., of Reseda, California, had signed a contract for a $13.8 million insurance restoration project. This project was just the most recent of a series of large restoration jobs obtained by ZZZZ Best (pronounced "zee best"). Located in the San Fernando Valley of southern California, ZZZZ Best had begun operations in the fall of 1982 as a small, door-ta-door carpet cleaning operation. Under the direction of Barry Minkow, the extroverted 16-year-old who founded the company and initially operated it out of his parents' garage, ZZZZ Best experienced explosive growth in both revenues and profits during the first several years of its existence. In the three-year period from 1984 to 1987, the company's net income surged from less than $200,000 to more than $5 million on revenues of $50 million. When 72ZZ Best went public in 1986,Minkow and several of his close associates became multimillionaires overnight. By the late spring of 1987,the market value of Minkow's stock in the company exceeded $100 million, while the total market value of 72ZZ Best surpassed $200 million. The youngest chief executive officer in the nation enjoyed the "good life;which included an elegant home in an exclusive suburb of Los Angeles and a fire-engine red Ferrari. Minkow's charm and entrepreneurial genius made him a sought-after commodity on the television talk show circuit and caused the print and visual media to tout him as an example of what America's youth could attain if they would only apply themselves. During an appearance on The Oprah Winfrey Show in April 1987,Minkow exhorted his peers with evangelistic zeal to "Think big, be big" and encouraged them to adopt his personal motto, "The sky is the limit~ Less than two years after appearing on Oprah, Barry Minkow began serving a 25-year prison sentence. Tried and convicted on 57 counts of securities fraud, Minkow had been exposed as a fast-talking con artist who swindled his closest friends and Wall Street out of millions of dollars. Federal prosecutors estimate that, at a minimum, Minkow cost investors and creditors $100 million. The company that Minkow founded was, in fact, an elaborate Ponzi scheme. The reported profits of the firm were nonexistent and the large restoration contracts, imaginary. As one journalist reported, rather than building a corporation, Minkow created a hologram of a corporation. In July 1987,just three months after the company's stock reached a market value of $220 million, an auction of its assets netted only $62,000. Unlike most financial frauds, the ZZZZ Best scam was perpetrated under the watchful eye of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC,a large and reputable West Coast law firm that served as the company's general counsel, a prominent Wall Street brokerage firm, and an international public accounting firm all failed to uncover Minkow's daring scheme. Ultimately, the persistence of an indignant homemaker who had been bilked out of a few hundred dollars by ZZZZ Best resulted in Minkow being exposed as a fraud. How a teenage flimflam artist could make a mockery of the complex regulatory structure that oversees the U.S.securities markets was the central question posed by a congressional subcommittee that investigated the ZZZZ Best debacle. That subcommittee was headed by Representative John D. Dingell, chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Throughout the investigation,
109

SECTION ONE

COMPREHENSIVE CASES

Representative Dingell and his colleagues focused on the role the company's independent auditors played in the ZZZZ Best scandal. The ZZZZ Best prospectus told the public that revenues and earnings from insurance restoration contracts were skyrocketing but did not reveal that the contracts were completely fictitious. Where were the independent auditors and the others that are paid to alert the public to fraud and deceit?t Like many other daring financial frauds, the ZZZZ Best scandal caused Congress to reexamine the maze of rules that regulate financial reporting and serve as the foundation of the U.S. system of corporate oversight. However, Daniel Akst, a reporter for The Wall Street Journal who documented the rise and fall of Barry Minkow, suggested that another ZZZZ Best was inevitable. "Changing the accounting rules and securities laws will help, but every now and then a Barry Minkow will come along, and ZZZZ Best will happen again. Such frauds are in the natural order of things, I suspect, as old and enduring as human needs.,,2

The Early History of ZZZZ Best Company
Barry Minkow was introduced to the carpet cleaning industry at the age of 12 by his mother, who helped make ends meet by working as a telephone solicitor for a small carpet cleaning firm. Although the great majority of companies in the carpet cleaning industry are legitimate, the nature of the business attracts a disproportionate number of shady characters. There are essentially no barriers to entry: no licensing requirements, no apprenticeships to be served, and only a minimal amount of start-up capital is needed. A l6-year-old youth with a driver's license can easily become what industry insiders refer to as a "rug sucker," which is exactly what Minkow did when he founded ZZZZ Best Company. Minkow quickly learned that carpet cleaning was a difficult way to earn a livelihood. Customer complaints, ruthless competition, bad checks, and nagging vendors demanding payment complicated the young entrepreneur's life. Within months of striking out on his own, Minkow faced the ultimate nemesis of the small businessperson: a shortage of working capital. Because of his age and the fact that ZZZZ Best was only marginally profitable, local banks refused to loan him money. Ever resourceful, the brassy teenager came up with his own innovative ways to finance his business: check kiting, credit card forgeries, and the staging of thefts to fleece his insurance company. Minkow's age and personal charm allowed him to escape unscathed from his early brushes with the law that resulted from his creative financing methods. The ease with which the "system" could be beaten encouraged him to exploit it on a broader scale. Throughout his tenure with ZZZZ Best, Minkow recognized the benefits of having an extensive social network of friends and acquaintances. Many of these relationships he developed and cultivated at a Los Angeles health club. After becoming a friend of Tom Padgett, an insurance claims adjuster, Minkow devised a scheme to exploit that friendship. Minkow promised to pay Padgett $100 per week if he would simply confirm over the telephone to banks and any other interested third parties that ZZZZ Best was the recipient of occasional insurance restoration contracts. Ostensibly, Minkow had obtained these contracts to clean and do minor remodeling work on properties damaged by fire, storms, or other catastrophes. Minkow convinced the
1. This and all subsequent quotations, unless indicated otherwise, were taken from the following source: U.S.Congress, House, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, Faiture of ZZZZ Best Co. (Washington, DC: U.s. Government Printing Office, 1988). 2. D.Akst, Wonder Boy, Barry MinkowThe Kid Who Swindled Wall Street (New York: Scribner, 1990),271.

CASE 1.9

ZZZZ

BEST COMPANY, INC.

111(

gullible Padgett that the sole purpose of the confirmations was to allow ZZZZ Best to circumvent much of the bureaucratic red tape in the insurance industry. From this modest beginning, the ZZZZ Best fraud blossomed. Initially, Minkow used the phony insurance restoration contracts to generate the paper profits and revenues he needed to convince bankers to loan him money. Minkow's phony financial statements served their purpose, and he expanded his operations by opening several carpet cleaning outlets across the San Fernando Valley.Minkow soon realized that there was no need to tie his future to the cutthroat carpet cleaning industry when he could literally dictate the size and profitability of his insurance restoration "business:' Within a short period of time, insurance restoration, rather than carpet cleaning, became the major source of revenue appearing on ZZZZ Best's income statements. Minkow's "the sky is the limit" philosophy drove him to be even more innovative. The charming young entrepreneur began using his bogus financial statements to entice wealthy individuals in his ever-expanding social network to invest in ZZZZ Best. Eventually, Minkow recognized that the ultimate scam would be to take his company public, a move that would allow him to tap the bank accounts of unsuspecting investors nationwide.

Going Public with ZZZZ Best
Minkow's decision to take ZZZZ Best public meant that he could no longer completely control his firm's financial disclosures. Registering with the SEC required auditors, investment bankers, and outside attorneys to peruse ZZZZ Best's periodic financial statements. ZZZZ Best was first subjected to a full-scope independent audit for the 12 months ended April 30, 1986. George Greenspan, the sole practitioner who performed that audit, confirmed the existence of ZZZZ Best's major insurance restoration contracts by contacting Tom Padgett. Padgett served as the principal officer of Interstate Appraisal Services, which reportedly contracted the jobs out to ZZZZ Best. By this time, Padgett was an active and willing participant in Minkow's fraudulent schemes. Minkow established Interstate Appraisal Services and Assured Property Management for the sole purpose of generating fake insurance restoration contracts for ZZZZ Best. In testimony before the congressional subcommittee that investigated the ZZZZ Best scandal, Greenspan insisted that he had properly audited Minkow's company. Greenspan testified that while planning the 1986 audit he had performed various analytical procedures to identify unusual relationships in ZZZZ Best's financial data. These procedures allegedly included comparing ZZZZ Best's key financial ratios with industry norms. Regarding the insurance contracts, Greenspan testified that he had obtained and reviewed copies of all key documents pertaining to those jobs. However, Greenspan admitted that he had not inspected any of the insurance restoration sites.
Congressman Lent:

Mr.

Mr Greenspan, I am interested in the SEC Form 5-1 that ZZZZ Best Company filed with the SEC ... You say in that report that you made your examination in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and other auditing procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances .... You don't say in that statement that you made any personal on-site inspections. Greenspan: It's not required. Sometimes you do; sometimes you don 't.1was satisfied that tl7esejobs existed and I was satisfied from at least six

different sources, including payment for the job. What could you want better than that?

SECTION ONE

COMPREHENSIVE CASES

Congressman Lent: Mr. Greenspan:

Yourposition is that you are an honest and reputable accountant.

Yes,sir.

Congressman Lent:

You were as much a victim as some of the investors in this company? I was a victim all right.... I am as much aghast as anyone. And every night I sit down and say, why didn't I detect this damned fraud.

Mr. Greenspan:

Retention of Ernst & Whinney by ZZZZ Best
Shortly after Greenspan completed his audit of ZZZZ Best's financial statements for fiscal 1986,which ended April 30, 1986,Minkow dismissed him and retained Ernst & Whinney to perform the following year's audit. Apparently, ZZZZ Best's investment banker insisted that Minkow obtain a Big Eight accounting firm to enhance the credibility of the company's financial statements. At approximately the same time,and for the same reason, Minkow retained a high-profile Los Angeles law firm to represent ZZZZ Best as its legal counsel. The congressional subcommittee asked Greenspan what information he provided to Ernst & Whinney regarding his former client. In particular, the subcommittee wanted to know whether Greenspan discussed the insurance restoration contracts with the new auditors.
Congressman Wyden: iHr. Greenspan, in September 1986, Ernst & Whinney carne on as the new independent accountant for ZZZZ Best. What did you communicate to Ernst & Whinney with respect to the restoration contracts?

Mr. Greenspan:

Nothing. I did-there was nothing because they never got in touch with me. It's protocol for the new accountant to get in touch with the old accountant. They never got in touch with me, and it's still a mystery to me.

Representatives of Ernst & Whinney later testified that they did, in fact, communicate with Greenspan prior to accepting ZZZZ Best as an audit client. However, Ernst & Whinney did not comment on the nature or content of that communication. (Greenspan was not recalled to rebut Ernst & Whinney's testimony on this issue.i Exhibit 1 contains the engagement letter signed by Ernst & Whinney and Barry Minkow in September 1986.The engagement letter outlined four services that the audit firm intended to provide ZZZZ Best: a review of the company's financial statements for the three-month period ending July 31, 1986;assistance in the preparation of a registration statement to be filed with the SEC;a comfort letter to be submitted to ZZZZ Best's underwriters; and a full-scope audit for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1987. Ernst & Whinney completed the review, provided the comfort letter to ZZZZ Best's underwriters, and apparently assisted the company in preparing the registration statement for the SEC; however, Ernst & Whinney never completed the 1987 audit. The audit firm resigned on June 2, 1987, amid growing concerns that ZZZZ Best's financial statements were grossly misstated. The congressional subcommittee investigating the ZZZZ Best fraud questioned Ernst & Whinney representatives at length regarding the bogus insurance restoration contracts-contracts that accounted for 90 percent of ZZZZ Best's reported profits.

3. After a lengthy investigation, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ruled in 1998 that there was no "prima facie evidence" that Greenspan had violated the organization's Code of Professionat Conduct during the time that ZZZZ Best was his client. A similar conclusion was reached by two state boards of accountancy with which Greenspan was registered to practice public accounting.

CASE 1.9

ZZZZ

BEST COMPAr-IY.

I"c.

113

EXHIBIT 1

September

12, 1986

ERNST 8.: WHlr-I1\EY'S

ZZZZ
Mr. Barry Minkow Chairman of the Board ZZZZ Best Co., Inc. 7040 Darby Avenue Reseda, California Dear Mr. Minkow:
LETTER

BEST

E:\GAGBIEi'\T

This letter accountants services

is to confirm

our understanding

regarding

our engagement and the nature

as independent of the

of ZZZZ BEST CO., INC. (the Company)

and limitations

we will provide. the following services: sheet of the Company and changes with standards of an opinion as of July 31, 1986, in financial position established an audit regarding and the related for the three Institute of the taken as statements, statements

We will perform

1. We will review the balance statements months Certified objective a whole, statements of income, retained then ended,

earnings,

in accordance

by the American the financial

Public Accountants. and, accordingly, is presently

We will not perform we will not express

of such financial on them.

of which is the expressing expected

an opinion

Our report

on the financial

to read as follows: consolidated and the related position balance sheet of ZZZZ BEST CO., consolidated period

"We have made a review of the condensed INC. and subsidiaries statements of income as of July 31. 1986, and changes

condensed

in financial

for the three-month

ended July 31, 1986, in accordance with standards established by the American of Certified Public Accountants. A review of the condensed consolidated Institute financial statements for the comparative information data, accepted period of the prior year was not made. of obtaining of persons an understanding applying than analytical for for responsible information, less in scope regarding A review of financial of the system financial review procedures in accordance statements consists of interim principally financial inquiries standards, an opinion

for the preparation to financial matters.

and making auditing

and accounting

It is substantially of expressing

an examination

with generally taken as a whole.

which will be performed the financial such an opinion.

the full year with the objective

Accordingly,

we do not express

Based on

our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should condensed consolidated interim financial statements referred to above in conformity Our engagement with generally cannot be relied accepted accounting principles." errors, irregularities, we will inform

be made to the for them to be

upon to disclose may exist.

or illegal

acts,

including fraud or defalcations, that matters that come to our attention. 2. We will assist Securities and related in the preparation

However,

you of any such

of a Registration advice and counsel S-X.

Statement

(Form S-l)

under

the statements

Act of 1933 including information

in conforming

the financial

to Regulation

3. We will assist

in resolving

the accounting of the Registration

and financial Statement

reporting referred

questions to above.

which will arise

as a part of the preparation

4. We will prepare a letter mind the limited nature

for the underwriters, if required (i.e., a Comfort Letter), bearing of the work we have done with respect to the financial data.

in

(continued)

CASE 1.9

ZZZZ

BEST COMPANY, INC.

113

EXHIBIT 1

September

12, 1986

ERNST

& WHINNEY'S
BEST

ZZZZ
Mr. Barry Minkow Chairman of the Board
LETTER

ENGAGEMENT

ZllZ Best Co., lnc.
7040 Darby Avenue Reseda, California Dear Mr. Minkow: This letter accountants services is to confirm our understanding regarding our engagement and the nature as independent of the

of ZZZZ BEST CO., lNe. (the Company)

and limitations

we will provide. the following services: sheet of the Company and changes with standards as of July 31, 1986, in financial established an audit and the related for the three Institute of the statements,

We will perform

1. We will review the balance statements months Certified of income, retained then ended,

earnings,

position

in accordance

by the American

Public Accountants.

We will not perform

of such financial

objective of which is the expressing of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole, and, accordingly, we will not express an opinion on them. Our report on the financial statements is presently expected to read as follows: consolidated and the related position balance sheet of ZZZZ BEST CO., consolidated period

"We have made a review of the condensed INe. and subsidiaries statements of income as of July 31, 1986, and changes

condensed

in financial

for the three-month

ended July 31, 1986, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the comparative information data, accepted period of the prior year was not made. of obtaining of persons an understanding applying than analytical for for responsible information, less in scope regarding A review of financial of the system financial review procedures in accordance statements consists of interim principally financial inquiries standards, an opinion

for the preparation to financial matters.

and making auditing

and accounting

It is substantially of expressing

an examination

with generally taken as a whole.

which will be performed the financial such an opinion.

the full year with the objective

Accordingly,

we do not express

Based on

that should be made to the our review, we are not aware of any material modifications condensed consolidated interim financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity Our engagement with generally cannot accepted accounting principles." errors, irregularities, or illegal acts,

be relied upon to disclose may exist.

including fraud or defalcations, that matters that come to our attention. 2. We will assist Securities and related in the preparation

However,

we will inform you of any such

of a Registration advice and counsel S-X.

Statement

(Form S-l)

under the statements

Act of 1933 including information

in conforming

the financial

to Regulation

3. We will assist in resolving as a part of the preparation 4. We will prepare mind the limited a letter nature

the accounting of the Registration

and financial Statement if required

reporting referred (i.e.,

questions to above.

which will arise

for the underwriters,

a Comfort

Letter),

bearing

in

of the work we have done with respect

to the financial

data.

(continued)

114

SECTION ONE

C()MI'REIIE"'~IVE C\~E~

EXHIBIT 1continued
ERNST

5. We will examine auditing standards internal the extent understood course standards control

the consolidated approved

financial

statements Institute that

of the Company as of April 30, 1987, with generally accepted These the Company's evidential in the matter be of Certified Public Accountants.

& WHINNEY'S
BEST

and for the year then ended contemplate, system of our audit that

and issue our report in accordance by the American other things,

ZZZZ
LETTER

ENGAGEMENT

among tests;

(1) we will study and evaluate sufficient

as a basis for reliance and (2) that will necessarily and that basis for our opinion

on the accounting on the financial be governed

records and for determining However, it should developed

we will be able to obtain

to afford a reasonable

statements. depending

our reports

by the findings

of our examination progresses, opinion.

we could be required, unqualified indicate if any, that

upon the circumstances, to express an

to modify our reporting examination unqualified report

from the typical

opinion.

We will advise you, as our generally on a test basis, it

if any developments our examination irregularities,

that we will be unable may exist.

Because disclose

will be performed

will not necessarily

However, we will promptly

to you any irregularities

which our examination

does disclose. personnel records, involved plus outof of

Our fees will be derived of-pocket assistance volume expenses. received of business, our work. Among these

from our customary factors are the general

rates for the various of the accounting

Certain

can have an effect condition

on the time incurred of data, that billing

in the conduct the amount

from your personnel any significant

in the accumulation reporting issues

the size and transaction with

financial

arise in connection for the various

the SEe's review of the 5-1. as well as unforeseen understanding of the situation, the amount which we will be providing are estimated to be: statements

circumstances.

Based upon our current services

of our proposed

Review of the July 31, 1986 financial Assistance in the preparation Comfort Letter Audit of financial We will invoice month statements

of the Registration as of April 30, 1987 for the time charges upon

Statement

$ 5,000-$ 7,500 8,000-30,000 4,000-6,000 24,000-29,000 incurred in the previous

you each month

and expenses presentation. assigned

and such invoices

are due and payable

Larry D. Gray, Partner, Griffith, Audit Manager, appreciate

is the Client Service and Michael your engagement with you. Please the enclosed

Executive

to the engagement.

Peter

McCormick,

Tax Manager,

have also been assigned, we shall be arrangements of

We greatly pleased by signing the terms

of our firm; if you have any questions, indicate your acceptance constitutes of the above copy. This letter

to discuss

them

and returning

the full understanding

of our engagement.

Very truly yours, Ernst & Whinney By Larry D. Gray, Partner ACCEPTED: ZZZZ BEST 9/16/86

co.,

INC. of the Board (signed)

Barry J. Minkow, Chairman

Congres.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best Company

...ZZZZ Best company Inc. Summary “ZZZZ Best company” was founded by 16-year old Barry Minkow. The core activity of company was carpet cleaning. As he began doing business, Minkow soon realized that carpet cleaning was a difficult way to earn money because customers always complained and vendors demanded payments. Soon Minkow started seeking for financing but realized that bank were not willing to lend him money due to his age and low profitability of his business. That’s why he came up with the idea of forgeries and thefts from his insurance company. Later on, making friends he asked the insurance claim adjuster - Tom Padgett to confirm from time to time that Minkow’s company received occasional insurance restoration contracts on remodeling works on properties damaged by fire, storms and other catastrophes. Soon he realized that there was no need in development of carpet business because the main “income” was obtained by restoration operations. Then, Minkow decided to go public and for that purpose he hired independent auditor – George Greenspan. By that time Minkow had established fake insurance company and Padgett had got the top position in it to confirm fraudulent restoration contracts, so Greenspan didn’t notice any problems with those sites. By the end of the year he was dismissed and Minkow retained “Ernst & Whinney” to enhance creditability of his operations on restoration contracts. “Ernst & Whinney” agreed to provide 4 types of services to “ZZZZ best......

Words: 1399 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best Company

...Transcript of ZZZZ Best Company, Inc ZZZZ Best Company, Inc Case 1.9 Audit Review VS Full Audit Review • The accountant is not aware of any misstatements or material modifications that need to be made • Limited assurance • Auditor has no opinion on the financial statements, just looks them over Barry Minkow- 16 years old 1982 Carpet cleaning business turned insurance restoration Tom Padgett and Interstate Appraisal Services Ernst & Whinney- elaborate scheme to convince them History 1. Client imposed audit limitations 2. Limitations of audit evidence 3. Importance of auditor communication when one resigns & 8K filing Key Issues Audit- • Auditor obtains a high level of assurance • Auditor can express an opinion about the accuracy and level of assurance • Auditor tests internal controls and tests for misstatements and obtains and understanding of the entities internal control and fraud risk Matt Sepiol Samantha Claysen Limitations of Audit Evidence AU 326- Audit Evidence Auditors Used Confirmation, Documentation, and Analytical Procedures AU 326.08- Information from outside sources is better than from internal sources Confirmations were made by Tom Padgett who was involved in the scheme. Interstate Appraisal Services and Assured Property Management provided the Documentation Was Involved in Fraud Collusion amongst outside Parties Gives Evidence Limitations The client receiving payment doesn't prove the existence of those contracts. No......

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Zzzz Best Company

...mengeluarkan opini audit atas laporan keuangan Best ZZZZ tetapi mengeluarkan laporan review terhadap laporan kuartalan perusahaan untuk tiga bulan yang berakhir 31 Juli 1986. Bagaimana tinjauan berbeda dari audit, terutama dalam hal tingkat jaminan tersirat oleh laporan auditor? Jawab : Riview dilakukan untuk mendapatkan dasar memadai untuk memberikan jaminan terbatas yang laporan keuangan klien telah disusun sesuai dengan prinsip akuntansi yang berlaku umum. Audit independen dirancang untuk memberikan dasar memadai untuk menyatakan pendapat tentang apakah atau tidak laporan keuangan klien ini telah disusun sesuai dengan prinsip akuntansi yang berlaku umum. Ada juga perbedaan besar antara review dan audit dalam hal lingkup pekerjaan yang dilakukan. Ketika review ini dilakukan, teknik pengumpulan bukti utama adalah prosedur analitis dan pertanyaan dari personil klien. Padahal, dalam audit, berbagai macam teknik pengumpulan bukti yang tersedia kepada auditor kemungkinan akan digunakan. Riview tidak menilai risiko pengendalian, tes catatan akuntansi dan tanggapan terhadap pertanyaan dengan mendapatkan memvalidasi bukti melalui inspeksi, pengamatan atau prosedur audit lain. Hal ini dapat menunjukkan hal-hal yang signifikan dari laporan keuangan tetapi tidak memberikan jaminan keakuratan. Karena riview umumnya tidak seperti audit, bukti yang dikumpulkan dari riview lebih sedikit dibandingkan dengan audit. Masalah dengan kasus Best ZZZZ adalah bahwa review auditor tidak cukup......

Words: 838 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best Company

...Practice set for Chapters 15 and 16 1) The single-rate cost-allocation method may base the denominator choice on: A) master-budget capacity utilization B) normal capacity utilization C) practical capacity D) All of these answers are correct. 2) Benefits of the single-rate method include: A) the low cost of implementation B) fixed costs that are transformed into variable costs for user decision making C) signals regarding how variable and fixed costs behave differently D) information that leads to outsourcing decisions that benefit the organization as a whole 3) Benefits of the dual-rate method include: A) variable costs that are transformed into fixed costs for user decision making B) the low cost of implementation C) avoidance of expensive analysis for categorizing costs as either fixed or variable D) information that leads to outsourcing decisions that benefit the organization as a whole 4)The advantage of using practical capacity to allocate costs: A) is that it allows a downward demand spiral to develop B) is that it focuses management's attention on managing unused capacity C) is that budgets are much easier to develop D) Either A or B are correct. Answer the following questions using the information below: The Bonawitz Corporation has a central copying facility. The copying facility has only two users, the Marketing Department and the Operations Department. The following data apply to the coming......

Words: 1260 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best Company Case

...ZZZZ Best Company, Inc. Shiqi Hu, Lin Ding, Trang Mai, Yi Wang ACCT3309 Audit, O’Hara 11/03/2014 Background Barry Minkow, who is a young entrepreneur with history of credit card fraud as a teenager, was convicted on 57 counts of securities fraud. He started ZZZZ Best Company in carpet cleaning business in 1982 when he was only 16 years old. ZZZZ Best Company was turned into insurance restoration business that Minkow recognized the benefits with his own “innovative” way to finance his business. Minkow used fake restoration contracts to generate the paper profits and fake information to convince bankers to loan him money with help from his friend, Tom Padgett. The company focused on insurance restoration business and went public in 1986. First full-scope audit was completed by George Greenspan in April 1986. Ernst & Whinney was hired in 1987 after George was dismissed by Minkow. Larry Gary, auditor from Ernst & Whinney, required to visit a restoration site in a multimillion-dollar contract but was discouraged by Minkow. Minkow also required auditors to sign a confidentiality agreement that not to make any follow-up phone calls to any contractors and owners of the buildings before the visit to these phony sites. In May 1987, the Los Angeles Times published article on ZZZZ Best Company fraud accusations. Audit firms resigned after confirmations of the fraud and Ernst & Whinney received an anonymous letter that contains several allegations of fraudulent......

Words: 1473 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Case 1.9 Zzzz Best Company

...Case 1.9 ZZZZ Best Company, Inc. 1. A review is similar to an audit but is less in scope and only provides limited assurance in regards to the presentation of the financial statement. This differs with an audit that gives reasonable assurance that no material errors or illegal acts are detected. The objective of an audit is to provide a reasonable basis for expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. A review does not provide a basis for the expression of such an opinion because a review does not involve obtaining an understanding of the internal control structure or assess control risk, tests of accounting records and of responses to inquiries by obtaining corroborating evidential matter through inspection, observation or confirmation, and certain other procedures ordinarily performed during an audit. A review mostly involves inquires of client personnel and analytical procedures. In a review an accountant does not give an opinion as to the fair presentation of the financial statements, reasonable assurance. Instead the accountant states that no material modification came to his/her attention in order for the statements to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, limited assurance. 2. As it relates to the assertion of occurrence and existence, third-party confirmations are usually highly reliable and auditors normally seek these out for a complete audit. While these forms of evidence can be reliable this......

Words: 1010 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best

...auditor discharges professional responsibilities with competence and diligence. It imposes the obligation to perform professional services to the best of the auditor’s ability with concern for the best interest of the public. The sole proprietor-auditor and Ernst & Whinney did not gather enough evidence on the restoration contracts, nor viewed the evidence gathered with skepticism. Between 1985 and 1986 there is a 390% increase in Revenue and 350% increase in Cost of goods sold. The auditors should question the increase in accounts receivable, which was 33% of sales and represents four months on an annualized basis. The auditors should question where the cash is from the collection of sales (Sales of $4,845 less A/R of $693 less Cost of goods sold of$2,050). The company should have approximately $2 million to pay down liabilities or invest in assets. With the cash flow with borrowings of current liabilities and notes payable, the company had approximately $6.5 million before paying cost of goods sold or approximately $4.5 to pay down liabilities or invest in the company, yet cash only increased $50,000 for the year. Where was the cash used? 1. ZZZZ Best Company, which was initially a small rug-cleaning business, was founded by Barry Minkow when he was sixteen years old. 2. Minkow transformed ZZZZ Best into a leading company in...

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Zzzz Best

...Case 4-6 ZZZZ Best* The story of ZZZZ Best is one of greed and audaciousness. It is the story of a 15-year old boy from Reseda, California who was driven to be successful regardless of the costs. His name is Barry Minkow. Minkow had high hopes to make it big – to be a millionaire very early in life. He started a carpet cleaning business in the garage of his home. Minkow realized early on that he was not going to become a millionaire cleaning other people’s carpets. He had bigger plans than that. Minkow was going to make it big in the insurance restoration business. In other words, ZZZZ Best would contract to do carpet and drapery cleaning jobs after a fire or flood. Since the damage from the fire or flood probably would be covered by insurance, the customer would be eager to have the work done. The only problem with Minkow’s insurance restoration idea was that it was all a fiction. There were no insurance restoration jobs, at least for ZZZZ Best. In the process of creating the fraud, Minkow was able to dupe the auditors, Ernst & Whinney into thinking the insurance restoration business was real. In fact, over 80 percent of his revenue was allegedly from this work. The auditors never caught on until it was too late. How Barry Became a Fraudster Minkow wrote a book, Clean Sweep: A Story of Compromise, Corruption, Collapse, and Comeback** that provides some insights into the mind of a 15-year old kid __________________ * The facts are derived from a......

Words: 3056 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Zzzz Best Fraud

...Barry Minkow founded ZZZZ Best (pronounced Zee Best) while 15 years old and a sophomore in high school. The business started in his parent’s garage with three employees and four telephones. Minkow struggled to meet basic expenses in the beginning. In January 1986, ZZZZ Best went public and began to sell shares on NASDAQ. However, the company began to rapidly decline. In July 1987, Minkow resigned and the company sued him for fraud allegations. This landed Minkow in federal prison, with a sentence of 25 years for 57 counts of fraud. In the beginning, Minkow struggled to meet the basic expenses of his company. Two banks closed his business accounts because the California Law did not allow minors to sign binding contracts, including checks. He began to receive several customer complaints as well as the demand for payment from suppliers. At times, Minkow also found it hard to meet payroll. Because of the lack of operating capital, Minkow financed his business by check kiting, stealing and selling his grandmothers jewelry, staging break-ins at his offices, and running up fraudulent credit card charges. With the help of Tom Padgett, an insurance claims adjuster, ZZZZ Best branched into the “insurance restoration” business. Minkow forged many documents which claimed that the company was involved in several restoration projects for Padgett’s company. Both Minkow and Padgett formed a fake company, Interstate Appraisal Services, which verified the details of the restorations to......

Words: 626 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Zzzz Best

...CEO of a company worth over $200 million and you are only 20 years old. Your personal net worth is more than $100 million. You own a signature red Ferrari and Oprah is begging you to be on her show. It's the stuff of fairy tales, but for one man, it was the beginning of an odyssey that would lead to prison. Meet Barry Minkow who in 1982, when he was only16, founded ZZZZ Best Carpet Cleaning. Over the next several years, he franchised the chain and took it public. "In the three-year period from 1984 to 1987, the com¬pany’s net income surged from less than $200,000 to more than $5 million on reve¬nues of $50 million. When ZZZZ Best went public in 1986, Minkow and several of his close associ¬ates became multimillionaires overnight. By the late spring of 1987, Minkow’s stock in the company had a market value exceeding $100 million, and the total market value of ZZZZ Best surpassed $200 million." (Knapp) Less than two years later, Minkow had been exposed as a fast talking con artist who bilked his closest friends and Wall Street out of millions of dollars. Barry Minkow began serving a twenty-five-year prison sentence after being tried and convicted on fifty-seven counts of securities fraud. ZZZZ Best differed in part from a typical Ponzi scheme in that Minkow’s carpet-cleaning business was very real. "Indeed, the carpet-cleaning division won high marks for its quality." (Miller) However, its insurance restoration division, which eventually accounted for 86 percent of company......

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Zzz Best Company

...ZZZ Best Company Inc. ZZZ Best Company, Inc. is good example for being explored by accounting students regarding audit field. In this case, ZZZ Best Company, Inc., which is established by Barry Minkow, became a tool for its owner i. E. Barry Minkow to get money by lying to thrid parties via fictitious insurance restoration project. Difficulties in developing carpet cleaning industry made Barry Minkow think to get money in wrong way. Collaborate with Tom Padgett and also extensive social network, made this big scheme to deceive big investors became easy. After success in cheating investors, Barry Minkow think bigger to make more money. He think to make ZZZ Best Company go public. For company which want to go public, it must fulfill many requirements of SEC. One of requirements is audited by accounting public officer. To fulfill that requirement, ZZZ Best Company Inc. hired George Greenspan to perform audit for 12 months. According to his testimony regarding ZZZ Best scandal to congressional subcommittee that investigated fraud in ZZZ Best Company, Inc., Greenspan insisted that he has proprtly audited Minkow’s company although finally Greenspan admitted that he had not inspected any of the insurance restoration sites. Next audit company which audited Minkow’s company was Ernst and Whinney. From Greenspan confession, he already communicate with Ernst and Whinney as predecessor auditor who audited ZZZ Best but this statement was rejected by Ernst......

Words: 593 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Audit Individual Assignment

...Andrey Simonov From: Caitlin Doonan Subject: ZZZZ Best ------------------------------------------------- Date: October 10, 2013 ZZZZ Best Company, Inc., a carpet cleaning and restoration company became the illegitimate business front for one of the largest investment frauds in American history. Barry Minkow started working in the cutthroat carpet cleaning industry at a young age. A risky Minkow began perpetrating frauds on a small scale and eventually took his Ponzi scheme public. Red flags went unnoticed from banks, investors, and auditors. Crucial auditor mistakes postponed the uncovering of Minkow’s scam. ZZZZ Best, Inc. significantly impacted both the accounting and auditing industry both in practice and standards. Barry Minkow founded ZZZZ Best Company at the age of sixteen. Minkow’s exposure to the carpet cleaning industry came from his mother. She answered phones and conducted clerical work for a carpet cleaning company in the San Fernando Valley of California (Knapp). The carpet cleaning industry required very little start-up capital, even less experience, and no licensing requirements. These attributes enticed Minkow, a young entrepreneur, to start his own company.. However, the competition in the carpet cleaning industry made it difficult for Minkow to make profitable sales. Vendors wanted money from Minkow and sales were not enough to cover his costs. Banks refused to loan him money because his company barely made a profit (Knapp). These financial......

Words: 1662 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Zzz Best Company

...Fraud of ZZZ Best Company The ZZZ Best was the carpet cleaning company that was started by 15 year old Barry Minkow in 1982. He was inspired to enter into this industry by his mother when he was 12 years old. His mother was working as a telephone solicitor for a small carpet cleaning firm. Though most of the companies in carpet cleaning industry were legitimate, the nature of this business attracts many seedy characters of the malpractice. There are no barriers for any entry even no license was required. It was too easy that a 16 year old boy can start this business with his new driver’s license. The boy started his business as “rug sucker”. Minkow started his business named ZZZZ Best Carpet Cleaning Company in Reseda, San Fernando Valley, California. In the beginning stage Minkow ran his home based business out of his parent’s garage. Minkow soon realized that a small carpet cleaning business grew rapidly in next five years, but Minkow realized that it was difficult to earn from this business. To make earning better he had to face the cutthroat competition. The young boy had to face customer complaints, bad checks, and nagging vendors also demanding payment. And within very short time phrase he faced the fact of shortage of working capital. And moreover because of Minkow’s young age and the fact that ZZZZ Best was only marginally profitable business. All the local banks refused to give him loan. So, this teenager was looking for some easy ways of earning. Like check......

Words: 2246 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Case Study Zzzz

...CASE 1.9 ZZZZ Best Company, \nc. On May 19,1987, a short article in The Wall Street Journal reported that ZZZZ Best Company, Inc., of Reseda, California, had signed a contract for a $13.8 million insurance restoration project. This project was just the most recent of a series of large restoration jobs obtained by ZZZZ Best (pronounced "zee best"). Located in the San Fernando Valley of southern California, ZZZZ Best had begun operations in the fall of 1982 as a small, door-ta-door carpet cleaning operation. Under the direction of Barry Minkow, the extroverted 16-year-old who founded the company and initially operated it out of his parents' garage, ZZZZ Best experienced explosive growth in both revenues and profits during the first several years of its existence. In the three-year period from 1984 to 1987, the company's net income surged from less than $200,000 to more than $5 million on revenues of $50 million. When 72ZZ Best went public in 1986,Minkow and several of his close associates became multimillionaires overnight. By the late spring of 1987,the market value of Minkow's stock in the company exceeded $100 million, while the total market value of 72ZZ Best surpassed $200 million. The youngest chief executive officer in the nation enjoyed the "good life;which included an elegant home in an exclusive suburb of Los Angeles and a fire-engine red Ferrari. Minkow's charm and entrepreneurial genius made him a sought-after commodity on the television talk show circuit and......

Words: 3832 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Essay

...statements of ZZZZ Best; however, Ernst & Whinney did issue a review report on the companys quarterly statements for the three months ending July 31, 1986. How does a review differ from an audit, particularly in terms of the level of assurance implied by the auditors report ? Ernst & Whinney resigned as ZZZZ Bests auditor on June 2, 1987, following a series of disturbing events that caused the firm to question the integrity of M inkow and his associates. First, Ernst & Whinney was alarmed by a Los Angeles Times article in mid-May 1987 that revealed Minkow had been i nvolved in a string of credit card forgeries as a teenager. Second, on May 28, 1987, ZZZZ Best issued a press release, without consulting or notifying Ernst & Whinney, that reported record profits and revenues. The purpose of this press release was to restore in vestors confidence in the companyconfidence t hat had been shaken by the damaging Los Angeles Times story. Third, and most important, on May 29, Ernst & Whinney auditors discovered evidence supporting allegations made several weeks earlier by a third party informant t hat ZZZZ Bests insurance restoration business was fictitious. The informant had contacted Ernst & Whinney in April 1987 and asked for $25,000 in exchange for information proving that one of the firms clients was engaging i n a massive fraud. Ernst & Whinney refused to pay the sum, and the i ndividual recanted shortly thereafter, but not until the firm determined that t he allegation involved......

Words: 325 - Pages: 2