Week 2 Homework – GM520 Brad Booth 1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interests you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how? Submit a copy of the proposed regulation along with your responses to these five questions. The proposed regulation can be submitted as either a separate Word document (.doc) or Adobe file (.pdf). This means you will submit
Words: 777 - Pages: 4
proceeded to burn the flag. He was then arrested for desecration of property on a 1 year sentence and two-thousand dollar fine. Johnson then appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals of Texas but lost. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals would then see his case. This was the highest court in Texas that would see Criminal Appeals he then won on a 5-4 majority. The reasoning that the court used for overturning was not the fact of vandalism, but that it’s his freedom of speech. When taking this case
Words: 327 - Pages: 2
petition for re-employment was timely, and his discharge was “honorable”. However, Metro did not conform with the act’s requirement to quickly reinstate Petty to his former position. When Metro raised Petty’s alleged dishonesty as a defense, the appeals court responded by reminding Metro that USERRA allows an employer to terminate a former serviceman for “cause” after re-employment, but does not allow an employer to use that same
Words: 346 - Pages: 2
Audit problem in AFS American fuel & Supply Inc. use to prepare comparative financial statement for their fiscal year. One their December 31, 1985 financial statement auditor Touche Ross accompanied them by an unqualified audit opinion on February 28, 1986. Several months later Touche Ross discovered that the company’s 1985 financial statement contained a material error. Error was that American Fuel & Supply Inc. billed certain of its customers twice for merchandise that they had purchased; this
Words: 308 - Pages: 2
Nontraditional and Traditional Litigation There are several differences between the traditional and non-traditional litigation systems. First, the traditional litigation system is time-consuming. To have a fair judgment to the plaintiff and the defendant, the court gives equal opportunities to both sides to complain and defend. More documents and more evidences, including witnesses will be brought into the jury when the case is processing. It can take years to process a case through traditional
Words: 656 - Pages: 3
applicant would like to highlight the fact he could not establish and confirm his alibi since he was not able to question the witness or at least be informed of the day when the alleged crime happened. During the proceedings of the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, when the Investigative Judge was interrogated regarding the day when the alleged crime happened, he stated “At the beginning of the interrogation session the witness did not know exactly when the delivery had taken place. Later that
Words: 1963 - Pages: 8
KELLY McCLAIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OCTAGON PLAZA, LLC, Defendant and Respondent COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, 159 Cal. App. 4th 784; 71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885; January 31, 2008, Filed FACTS: 1. McClain owns and operates business known as A+ Teaching Supplies. 2. Ted and Wanda Charanian are the principals of Octagon, which owns and operates a shopping center in Valencia, California. 3. On February 28, 2003, McClain agreed to lease commercial space in the shopping
Words: 1318 - Pages: 6
An appeal is a proceeding where a ruling from a lower court is reviewed by a higher court in an attempt to convince the higher court that the lower courts judgment was incorrect. Appeals are an important part of the criminal justice process. Appeals are part of the system of checks and balances. They are important because they ensure that defendants have received due process in the prior stages of the criminal justice process and it ensures that none of their civil rights were violated. They are
Words: 1068 - Pages: 5
Legal Brief Week 8 Case 10.4 Mgmt 520 ➢ Style of Case and Citation: Mitchell v T.G.I. Friday’s 748 N.E.2d 89 (Ohio App. 2000) ➢ Court Rendering Final Decision: Ohio Appeals Court ➢ Identification of Parties and Procedural Details: Sandra Mitchell filed product liability against Friday’s, which served the food, and Pro Source Distributing, the supplier of the clams. Pro Source and Fridays filed for a motion of summary judgment, which the trial court granted
Words: 291 - Pages: 2
under the circumstances in which they were placed; and (2) that such negligent breach of duty was a proximate cause of the injury.” Thus, the judge has to make sure that there is an proximate cause of the Hairston’s death. ANALYSIS -The court of Appeals found out that Alexander was negligent because he failed to check the Hairston’s car which was on the road. The article states “These negligent acts of Alexander -- new and independent of any
Words: 373 - Pages: 2
