Over the last ten years, the Gallup’s poll has shown a trending decline in the tolerance for the USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act). Citizens are becoming more protective of their civil liberties than they were immediately following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Many U.S. citizens feel that the USA PATRIOT Act gives federal authorities excessive power and violates the protection provided
Words: 791 - Pages: 4
of Involvement in Terrorism Ryan D. Fischer Centennial High School Abstract In the latter parts of December 2011, the United States legislature passed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 as a means of dictating the specific authorities and funding methods for the current fiscal year. Sections 1021 and 1022 of the act serve to further government authority with regard to the detaining and subsequent trial of those suspected of terrorism or related activities
Words: 3946 - Pages: 16
bill and its provisions, its successes were made apparent, as well as its unconstitutionality. The Patriot Act: A Constitutional Analysis The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act, commonly known as the USA Patriot Act (USAPA), was signed into law during one of the most distressing periods in American history. Its hasty introduction spawned controversy across a variety of political spectrums. Concerns regarding the constitutionality
Words: 3174 - Pages: 13
worried much about self-defense or in this case homeland security. Due to the actions on September 11th homeland security has been the main goal of many politicians and voters. Homeland security builds coalitions and partnerships, protects civil rights and civil liberties, and develops human capital. History The foundations and principles of homeland security are rooted deeply in American history. The preamble of the Constitution, as written by Governor Morris (1776), references the need to “insure
Words: 1077 - Pages: 5
September 11th, 2001 is a day that will forever live in infamy; a day that has had far reaching effects on all those across the United States due to legislation policies that have infringed the civil liberties of citizens through unjust surveillance. In “Playing with Fire: The Civil Liberties Implications of September 11th,” Jon B. Gould discusses the heightened security policies that have arisen from the great tragedy which occurred on 9/11. Gould claims when Congress originally passed these provisions
Words: 1087 - Pages: 5
2015 Introduction The TSA is fundamental in protecting airlines and the passengers and crew that board the airplanes. The September 11th attacks caused the government to take action and try to find a method in which to keep the public safe from terrorism. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security was the largest collaborative effort between agencies that the public had ever seen. Since that time, the DHS hired many men and women for the TSA. These men and women don uniforms every day represent
Words: 760 - Pages: 4
Since 9/11, we have seen the magnitude of attempts to shake our nation. Therefore, it required us to give up some of our civil liberties to ensure that there are no preemptive attacks on our country. The summary outlines some controversial issues with the United States of America Patriot Act to include: The authority to intercept – In this case under the Enhanced Surveillance Procedures the government have the right to wiretap your phone calls and intercept electronic communication media (Senate
Words: 276 - Pages: 2
threats, Congress desired to approve legalistic and congressional oversight of foreign intelligence surveillance activities. Subsequently, electronic surveillance and the ability to physically locate individuals related to espionage or international terrorism affecting the US was also stipulated. In addition, as the statute describes there may be engagement in applying surveillance to the American population if the court dictates that there is a probable cause, meaning a relation with foreign powers.
Words: 862 - Pages: 4
began to be observed, in some urban centers. Police officers want to determine the facts in cases of criminality and to protect the public by apprehending the perpetrators of crime. Some argued that taking overly aggressive actions undermined the civil liberties upon which the American Nation was founded. Given these competing arguments, and the Warren Court’s then recent trend toward increases activism, the setting was set for a hearing of these matters in the highest court of the United States. That
Words: 1162 - Pages: 5
The definition of domestic terrorism in the United States has changed over the years. It is believed that the act of domestic terrorism occurred long before any legal definition came into play. The FBI Terrorist Research defined domestic terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence committed by a group of two or more individuals, also against a person or property to intimidate or coerce a government. Under current Law in the United States the act of terrorism are those which involve human
Words: 1312 - Pages: 6
