simplifying a complicated Philosophical theory for students, and understanding deeply the principles of Utilitarianism. Discussion Utilitarianism is mainly characterized by two elements: happiness and consequentialism. Utilitarian happiness is the biggest happiness which (supposedly) every human being looks for. In utilitarianism everything useful to happiness is good. Therefore, the name of the doctrine is utilitarianism, based on the principle of utility
Words: 845 - Pages: 4
Martha Nussbaum is known for her views on Virtue Ethics. She believes that Virtue Ethics are an alternative perspective rather than an opposition towards Deontology and Consequentialism. Utilitarianism is a type of consequentialism, which refers to the belief that a moral action should be carried out without any exceptions. For example, killing out a person of self-defense is wrong according to Utilitarianism because killing a person is an immoral act. Virtue Ethics can be defined as an approach
Words: 636 - Pages: 3
Consequentialism Whether an action is morally right or wrong depends entirely on its consequences. An action is right if it brings about the best outcome of the choices available. Otherwise it is wrong. The Good: Things (goals, states of affairs) that are worth pursuing and promoting. The Right: the moral rightness (or wrongness) of actions and policies. It says: “actions are Right when they maximize the Good”. And “"The ends justify the means". Consequentialism is based on two
Words: 531 - Pages: 3
listed makes sense. While working on the evaluation of the philosophical approaches we will discuss if the course of action is the most ethical, the best reasons for making the choices, and the reasons for believing this alternative is ethical. Consequentialism is the intent to maximize the usefulness of a decision. For this the relevance of this act depends on its consequences. For this approach it is essential to have a good ethical decisions and perception of it. With this it is important for students
Words: 6500 - Pages: 26
managements set forth the standards that the business holds as their ethics of practice. This can vary greatly from company to company dependent on the individual group’s views. Some businesses may operate on a consequentialist’s belief system. Consequentialism is the theory that the value and especially the moral value of an act should be judged by
Words: 966 - Pages: 4
course of action which is listed that makes sense. When evaluating the approaches we are informed to take a course of action that is most ethical, the best reasons for the choice making and the reasons for believing this alternative is ethical. Consequentialism is the intent to maximize the usefulness of a decision. The relevance of this act is depended on its consequences. Now for this approach it’s necessary to have good ethical decisions and perception of it. Even this is important for the students
Words: 1029 - Pages: 5
the different theories and how they affect our decisions. Ethical Theories The first theory we will examine is consequentialism. Rosalind Hursthouse defines consequentialism as, “an action is right if it promotes the best consequences and the best consequences are those in which happiness is maximized” ("Trinity University", 2001). There are two types of consequentialism; ethical egoism and utilitarianism. The first benefits only the individual performing an action and the later benefits
Words: 492 - Pages: 2
each chart has been filled in as an example. Mr. Knighton, I tried my best and I kept getting confused. This is what I have so far. What is good? (1–2 sentences) Aristotle – Virtue Ethics | Mill – Utilitarianism | Kant – Deontology | Consequentialism | Noddings – Care Ethics | For Aristotle, good is “every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim
Words: 987 - Pages: 4
ethical decisions and was it the best decision for the correct reasons in addition to determining the reasons are ethical. There are three key factors to evaluating philosophical approaches and they consist of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Consequentialism is the theory of the value especially the moral value that would be judged by its consequences. Deontology is slightly different due to focusing on moral responsibility as well as the obligation of motivating the decisions
Words: 942 - Pages: 4
Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy is a book by Bryan W. Van Norden that presents an encompassing view of Confucianism in light of virtue ethics and of Mohism in light of consequentialism. Throughout the book, Van Norden makes excellent and understandable bridges to compare the philosophies of the East and the West. He takes the perspectives presented by Aristotle’s virtue ethics and other western philosophers and contrasts them with the conceptions that Confucianism offers
Words: 1414 - Pages: 6
