a check on Executive power in the realm of detention. The plurality argued that executive power cannot take away the ability for a citizen to challenge the factual basis of his detention, even if he is an enemy combatant, by the great writ of habeas corpus. That same day in 2004 when Hamdi v. Rumsfeld was decided, the court also decided In Rasul v. Bush, which clarified the jurisdiction of U.S. courts over Guantanamo Bay, as well as any foreign nationals who were detained by the U.S. Government
Words: 871 - Pages: 4
Our nation, over the course of time, has been a prime target for foreign as well as domestic terrorist threats and attacks. As a result of these despicable actions new laws and acts have emerged with a pugnacious orientation. This paper highlights The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, and the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001. Understanding the aspects that form these Acts will broaden the understanding of the results enforced by
Words: 862 - Pages: 4
situation is sort of a complicated one, even though Judge Mcghee processed Gault wrongly, there was a petition filed with the court on the hearing day. This petition was not served to the gaults, in fact none of the family saw the petition until the habeas corpus hearing about a month later. The petition did not make much
Words: 536 - Pages: 3
powers to issue the below 5 writs. 1. What is Habeas corpus writ Habeas corpus literally means ‘you may have the body'. It is the most valuable writ for personal liberty. It is a remedy available to a person who is confined without legal justification. Through this writ, the court let it know the reasons for detention of the person and if there is no justification, order the authority concerned to set the person free. The writ of hebeas corpus, thus, entails the authority to produce the person
Words: 1374 - Pages: 6
Habeas Corpus POL201: American National Government Instructor: Paul Edleman Kimberly Rice December 17, 2012 Habeas Corpus in Latin, means, “You have the body.” In this paper I intend to inform the reader of the meaning of Habeas Corpus and its relationship to our civil liberties. I will also cover the revolution of habeas corpus; both the English and American traditions that have affected habeas corpus will be covered also. I will talk about the influence that the new threats of war
Words: 888 - Pages: 4
Habeas Corpus and GITMO prison Kirsten Nix POL 201 American National Government Instructor Jamie Smith March 17, 2013 Habeas Corpus and GITMO Prison When a terrorist decides to end the lives of many innocent citizens of the United States, do they deserve the right to be treated as a citizen of the United States? Do they deserve the right to a fair hearing? Some of you may say yes they do. While I can understand your point of view, even the justice system
Words: 1346 - Pages: 6
to evoke their rights of habeas corpus in an attempt to get U.S. Federal Courts to hear their cases (Jackson, 2010). The general meaning of the right of habeas corpus in the U.S. Constitution and its relationship to the protection of other civil liberties: In today's legal definitions, habeas corpus is the right of an individual who is incarcerated to question their dentition before a judge to validate the legitimacy of their being detained (Primus, 2010). Habeas corpus provisions are found throughout
Words: 2111 - Pages: 9
Habeas Corpus: Then and Now. Chasing Freedom Down the Rabbit Hole Robert W. Echols AIU Online ENGL106-1201B-226 English Composition Abstract Habeas Corpus is one of the fundamental protections guaranteed to Americans by the Constitution of the United States of America. This essay will describe the original intent of the writ, the transformations the writ has undergone, and the modern-day implementation of The Great Writ of Habeas Corpus. The essay will also explore how dangerous the practice
Words: 1018 - Pages: 5
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged
Words: 330 - Pages: 2
referred to the writ of habeas corpus as a fundamental legal underpinning of the new nation. The thirteen original states ratified the Constitution and then it was amended in 1791 by the Bill of Rights. The request for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus is made before a judge and, if granted, a prisoner must be brought before the judge. The writ requires whoever is holding the prisoner to produce him before the judge at a time determined by the judge. The writ of habeas corpus was the �mechanism�
Words: 587 - Pages: 3
