judicial branch in order to execute any search or seizure of personal property, as declared by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (Madison, 1789). The framers of the United States started the Constitution with a Bill of Rights that set our inalienable rights. These rights are not allowed to be violated and the legal system is designed to protect these rights, even if suspected of a crime. If the police want to investigate, interrogate, or search for evidence of a crime, the police
Words: 2363 - Pages: 10
born inside the country or outside the country his or her citizenship as an America and recognized as an America. American citizens protected from seizures and searches by law enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant presented. The warrant must be present before the seizure and search take place. The warrant will specify what and who will be search so that an individual privacy not invaded. The United States Constitution of the first amendment states Congress cannot make laws condensing
Words: 1932 - Pages: 8
government intrusion and from a government that has run wild with its own power. The Fourth Amendment says (Findlaw): The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. People have a right to feel safe
Words: 1704 - Pages: 7
Motion to Suppress Evidence A motion made to suppress evidence is made by a criminal when they believe that evidence was gathered in violation of their Fourth Amendment right of freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures (Motion, 2006). If the motion is granted by the court, this is often dispositive of the case because without the evidence, the case cannot proceed. This would be the case in this instance if the court granted the motion. However, there is no guarantee that if the evidence was
Words: 983 - Pages: 4
different internet websites. However, many believe this is in complete violation of the Fourth Amendment which protects against unwarranted searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to
Words: 2486 - Pages: 10
being a Jewelry Store Burglar based on static details given by an anonymous caller and police observation that something “sparkly” was in Defendant’s van, further Defendant never “voluntarily” consented to the warrantless arrest, and most notably seizure for the arrest in question occurred inside the threshold of Defendant’s home? Table of Contents Page Question
Words: 5468 - Pages: 22
The dispositions was reversed. Another case was Mapp v Ohio, The facts to this was Mapp was found with obscene things in her home while the police were in search of a fugitive. She is saying that her 1st amendment was violated due to her having the freedom of expression. The court said that all evidence found by search and seizure violates the 4th amendment right. Mapp was convicted of illegally obtained evidence. With this case the court had a hard time determining whether to apply this to
Words: 789 - Pages: 4
Constitutional Law Dr. Wilson April 22, 2014 Search and Seizure Response Paper I believe that the courts have put in place certain safeguards and limitations that ensure police officers do not interfere with an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. I could go into how search and seizure is defined and what is necessary for a warrant, but I want to go into a different direction and discuss how technology is changing the meaning of ; "The right of the people to be secure in their persons
Words: 523 - Pages: 3
legal search and seizure and police officers obtaining evidence in an illegal manner. Officers need to handle each situation when probable cause and reasonable suspicion is involved. Determining what is reasonable and what is not takes great skill, perseverance, comprehension of the law, and an innate intuitiveness on the part of the officer. The Fourth Amendment clearly defines the exceptions to the warrant requirement. There are several exceptions pertaining to a legal, valid search and seizure
Words: 1507 - Pages: 7
Article/Case Law Search HCS/430 February 4, 2013 Vanessa Williams Article/Case Law Search The aftermath of the 9/11 in 2001, has left the United States of America in frenzy. It is this particular event that has been devastating to our nation and unforgettable. Furthermore, stressing the importance of the safety and health of the general public. September 11, has caused federal and state governments to merge public health and public safety into one. This merger brought about the significance
Words: 520 - Pages: 3
