and federal court jurisdiction? A. In all cases, state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the federal courts. B. Federal courts begin with exclusive jurisdiction until a state court intervenes. C. In all cases, state courts have exclusive jurisdiction unless the state's Supreme Court grants jurisdiction to a federal court in the state. D. In some cases, state courts have exclusive jurisdiction; in some cases, state courts have concurrent jurisdiction with the federal courts. 2) Which
Words: 2279 - Pages: 10
unjustified and inequitable--Scheme formulated by the Supreme Court. For relief to drivers--Directions for giving retirement benefits, providing alternative jobs and payment of compensatory amount proportionate to length of service rendered by the drivers. Matter/facts - The termination of services of helper (in C.A.No. 1862) was unjustified and also illegal being in contravention of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Act. The High Court erred in treating his case on par with cases of other
Words: 1346 - Pages: 6
law that they would get in a juvenile court of law. There are not offered a chance to rehabilitate, and many people claim they are still minors and do not understand, or are immature and don’t understand their actions. Here is an example from proposition 21. “Under Proposition 21, prosecutors have the right to automatically file charges in adult criminal court in certain cases involving juvenile offenders.133 this means the juveniles are sent to adult court without a fitness hearing. Youths charge
Words: 484 - Pages: 2
decisions occasionally reflect such a reality. One West Virginia judge, for example, became so enraged at a defendant who began cursing at him in court that he jumped down from his bench, tore off his judicial robe, and bit the tip off the defendant’s nose (Smith, 1998). He served five days in jail on state assault charges, and was then tried in federal court for violating the defendant’s civil rights. Before he was acquitted of those charges, he acknowledged that his behavior was “bizarre and weird
Words: 21662 - Pages: 87
KELLY McCLAIN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OCTAGON PLAZA, LLC, Defendant and Respondent COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, 159 Cal. App. 4th 784; 71 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885; January 31, 2008, Filed FACTS: 1. McClain owns and operates business known as A+ Teaching Supplies. 2. Ted and Wanda Charanian are the principals of Octagon, which owns and operates a shopping center in Valencia, California. 3. On February 28, 2003, McClain agreed to lease commercial space in the shopping
Words: 1318 - Pages: 6
Management Research in India: Roughly between March and June, business schools carry a vacant look. The first-year-going-on-second-year MBA batch leaves for its summer internships to the corporate world whereas the faculty gets temporary relief from teaching and can concentrate on the other vital role incumbent on them — management research. This essential mandate of a b-school to pursue knowledge creation has largely been overlooked by the public eye amidst the expression surrounding placement salaries
Words: 2267 - Pages: 10
Handout #2 Brief Training Materials for Fall 2012 Messa v. Sullivan Court of Appeals, 1965. 61 Ill.App.2d 386, 209 N.E.2d 872. BURMAN, PRESIDING JUSTICE. Betty Messa brought this action against James Sullivan, Helen Sullivan and the Keyman's Club, an Illinois not for profit corporation, to recover damages for the bodily injuries which she sustained as the result of being bitten by the defendants' dog. The complaint
Words: 5896 - Pages: 24
Case Analysis CLARK v. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant. SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI, DIVISION ONE 179 Mo. 66; 77 S.W. 882; 1903 Mo. LEXIS 394 1. Provide a summary of the undisputed facts. On May 10, 1897, a train wrecked on Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railroad near Marthasville, Missouri. This train transported live animals. A conductor of the train informed a railroad track foreman that there was an accident and some steers were loose in the area and they needed
Words: 1763 - Pages: 8
the courts interpreted the legislation in a manner that can be seen as an individual’s human rights being violated. Being of different race, Fred Christie was refused to be served beer at a pub due to him being a coloured person. Christie entered a bar with some friends to catch a hockey game, however was refused to be served alcohol by the staff. Feeling humiliated, Christie decided to take to the court. The case made it through the Canadian court system all the way up to the Supreme Court of Canada
Words: 1190 - Pages: 5
be shielded from release, that doesn’t mean the entire document may be withheld. The agency must separate the exempt data and release the rest of it (this usually means taking a marker and blacking out some information). Re-argument of U.S. supreme court on federal income tax After the World War 1 the secretary of the treasury advised to have a widespread propaganda that entails convincing the public to let go of the needless pleasures that exist. The most important feature that was highlighted
Words: 2360 - Pages: 10
