Premium Essay

Bouvia V Supreme Court Case Summary

Submitted By
Words 891
Pages 4
Bouvia vs. Supreme Court The case of Bouvia vs the Supreme Court, is the case in which Bouvia, a patient at a public hospital, wanted a feeding tube removed that was placed in her against her will. In this essay I will give a brief overview of the case, then I will relate the relevance of a couple ethical terms. Thirdly, I will discuss how an act-utilitarian would approach this case and finally, I will give my opinion of this case. The hospital in which Bouvia was in put in, in an effort to get food into her system. Bouvia, who is a quadriplegic and has since birth suffered from a severe case of cerebral palsy, did not want it in because it was very uncomfortable and she didn't want to take measures to prolong her life. Because of the cerebral …show more content…
This principal is very relevant in the case of Bouvia vs. Supreme Court, because the basis of the case was that the hospital went against her will. In doing that the hospital took away Bouvia's autonomy. Bouvia was an intelligent lady with a college degree, though she had numerous times mentioned wanting to die she also confirmed that she did not want to commit suicide. That is a critical piece of this case because the argument that the hospital and court was arguing was that Bouvia was trying to commit suicide with the assistance of the state/ hospital. With all the facts together Bouvia would or should have been considered a rational individual making a very serious life altering decision. The principal of beneficence is defined as “we should do good to others and avoid doing them harm” (Vaughn, 10). This principal is also very relevant to this case and can really be taken from both sides. One side of the argument would be that the hospital was trying to do only good by placing the feeding tube in Bouvia and prolonging her life, therefore the hospital did no harm and the tube should remain in place. On the opposite side of the argument one could say that by placing the tube in Bouvia they prolonged her life and prolonged her suffering, therefore causing more harm then good to Bouvia and the tube should be

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Phil 235 Course Notes

...Chapter 1: Ethical Theory Meta-ethical positions include: * Ethical non-cognitivism (concept that ethics is a matter of feelings) * Ethical relativism (concept that ethics is relative to a particular point of view) * Ethical objectivism (notion that ethics is objective in nature). Meta-Ethical Positions Ethical Non-cognitivism The basis of ethical non-cognitivism is that ethical disagreement can be a highly emotional affair where no amount of reasoning is likely to convince the other party. * Example: “Let’s just agree to disagree” Ethical Relativism * Ethical relativism says that while ethical statements are cognitively meaningful, they do not hold in any objective sense because they depend on our point of view. * If we accept ethical relativism, then ethical disagreement among people who do not share the same perspective becomes impossible. * It assumes that if people agree on something, then it must be true. * Ethical relativism is suspect for a pragmatic reason: it is fundamentally at variance with our social practice. * Example: “To each his own”, or the belief that what’s right for one group isn’t necessarily right for another Ethical Objectivism * Ethical objectivism holds that right and wrong are objective phenomena. * Example: “I’m right and you’re wrong” What is Ethics? * As a discipline, ethics is a branch of philosophy. * It deals with questions of right and wrong conduct, and with what we ought to do and what...

Words: 23725 - Pages: 95