Premium Essay

Case Study: US V. Virginia

Submitted By
Words 471
Pages 2
United States V. Virginia was a Supreme Court case in 1996 that argued the Virginia Military Institute only accepted men for their program was unconstitutional, it violated the 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, by which the admission policy at Virginia Military Institute only accepted males. Theodore B. Olsen, (Virginia Military Institute/Defendant) suggested to create a Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership as a way to make an alternative route for women. Paul Bender (United States/Plaintiff), argued if the all women’s institute would compare to the men’s and if it would meet the qualifications of the Equal Protections Clause.
The Court found the suggestion unconstitutional in a 7-to-1 decision. Chief Justice, William Rehnquist …show more content…
This case did not overturn a previous Supreme Court decision. United States V. Virginia was also held in a lower court in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. This case was argued on January 17, 1996 and a decision was made just five months later on June 26, 1996.
I agree with the decision that the Justices made but to an extent. I think that some things should be separated. Learning for example I do believe that kids would better learn if they were not worried about how they looked everyday to impress the opposite sex, if they were in coed classes and schools maybe learning would be easier. I also think that yes that not allowing you to go to a certain school though because of your sex is a violation of your equality rights, so this is why I am not a Judge! I think that the suggestion that Theodore B. Olsen made was a good one although I’m not sure if the women’s institute would have been as good as the guys, since it had been around longer they would have taken more pride in the men’s school. Also, since it was a military base training type of school some believe that women should not be in the military field because they can not perform the same as men. I also agree with that, women can be to emotional at times and not be able to make the difficult decision that need to be made quickly. However, women can make different difficult decisions that med can not. So, who’s to judge? I think as a whole that the decision made was the correct one when it comes down to the constitution and having each person have equal

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

You Decide Es Gm520 Week 6

...You Decide ES  Review the Virginia Pollard case information located at the beginning of this project: You Decide ES. (If you click here, you will return to the face-sheet of the project area. To return to this page, click the Beginbutton again. You can do this all week.) To do well on this project, study the readings for this week and consider the work we did in Week 5. You may want to do some outside research for this project as well, reviewing recent case law on discrimination and harassment and including that in your answers to the project. Do not discuss this project with your classmates. You should do the work on your own. This project is "pooled," meaning your classmates may have different questions than you do. This project is worth 100 points toward your final grade. You can access this area all week and continue updating your answers until the end of the week – be sure to hit "save answers" before leaving each time! When you are done working on the project, hit "Submit for grade," and then it will be available in the gradebook for grading. Your role in answering the questions: You are the independent human resources consultant hired by Teddy's Supplies to help explain to the company what the case against them will entail. You have gleaned the facts from your investigations into the situation to date. You have never talked with Virginia Pollard. The case is currently in the appeals stage and the company executives have some questions for you. Answer them using the...

Words: 2883 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

The Statutes

...was illegal in many states for decades. However, interracial marriage in the United States has been fully legal in all U.S. states since the 1967 Supreme Court decision, Loving v. Virginia, that decreed all state antimiscegenation laws unconstitutional. Many states, of course, had chosen to legalize interracial marriage much earlier. According to a May 14, 2012, Huffington Post article entitled “Interracial Marriage Statistics: Pew Report Finds Mixed-Race Marriage Rates Rising,” the 1980 Census (the first to collect data on interracial marriage) reported that 3% of all married couples were from different races. The number had risen to 8.4% (one in twelve couples) by 2010. Looking at marriages recorded in the years between 2008 and 2010, we find that 22% of newly-married couples in Western states were of different races or ethnicities, compared to 14% in the South, 13% in the Northeast, and 11% in the Midwest. QUESTION 1: Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case): LOVING V. VIRGINIA CASE. 1. Facts of the case: In 1958, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. The two had gone to the District of Columbia to obtain a marriage license and returned to their home state of Virginia afterward. The couple was then charged with and convicted of inter-racial marriage later on they were confronted by police at their home. The police found their marriage certificate...

Words: 5896 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment

...punishing people who have committed higher levels of crimes. Although capital punishment has been around for centuries, the first known case of the death penalty in the American colonies happened in the James town colony in 1608 when George Kendall was executed for spying for the Spanish (Green, Melissa S.,compiler. (1998-2009). Focus on the Death Penalty). Capital Punishment is a subject in the United States that was and still is very controversial. Many people want capital punishment to be abolished but on the other hand there are a handful of people who want capital punishment to end. The purpose of this study is to show why capital punishment should be abolished. Capital punishment needs to be abolished because there are way too many cases and executions. During the time span of the Revolutionary war, capital punishment was widely accepted. During this time 162 documented cases of capital punishment were recorded. In the nineteenth century, following that era, capital punishment had increased to 1,391 documented cases. As of April 1, 2008, there were a total of 1,099 people who received the death penalty. The State of Texas had the most cases of capital punishment with a number of 405 cases (Bureau of Justice Statistics 1-2). That is way too many cases just for one state. The States of New York, New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Kansas recorded zero cases of capital punishment. In today’s society, 38 out of the 50 states in the United States accept the capital punishment idea. In...

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Accountant

...COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+) 347 U.S. 483 Argued December 9, 1952 Reargued December 8, 1953 Decided May 17, 1954 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS* Syllabus Segregation of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State solely on the basis of race, pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation, denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment -- even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors of white and Negro schools may be equal. (a) The history of the Fourteenth Amendment is inconclusive as to its intended effect on public education. (b) The question presented in these cases must be determined not on the basis of conditions existing when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted, but in the light of the full development of public education and its present place in American life throughout the Nation. (c) Where a State has undertaken to provide an opportunity for an education in its public schools, such an opportunity is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. (d) Segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprives children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal. (e) The "separate but equal" doctrine adopted in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, has no place...

Words: 2200 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Police Brutality Research

...Police brutality is one of the largest growing incidents¬ in the U.S today. It is a cruel crime That often leads to the killing of someone. At Virginia State University, a survey was given out to test students’ knowledge on police brutality. All of the participants are eighteen years or older, male and female, and there was only 1 out of 12 of the students who did not know what police brutality was. Key terms: Police Brutality, Police, Police Conduct Research Broad Topic: Police Brutality Narrow Topic: Police Brutality against People of color Research question: What is the opinion of Virginia State University students towards police brutality? Hypothesis: Males of color are more likely to witness or be victims of police brutality than any...

Words: 1596 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Smoking of Electronic Cigarrettes on Aircrafts

...unaware of the negative impacts it may bring to the air quality within the aircraft, and the impact it brings to the high-risk passengers aboard the aircraft. This regulation may not affect the organization I am working for but it definitely affects me as an individual. I work in a bank as a teller and thrice this year I have been a passenger of a plane which is preferable to me than driving 6 hours. I love flying and I would definitely enjoy it more with clean atmosphere and without the disturbance of a passenger sitting beside me inhaling and exhaling vapors. But of course this is not only about me, but of the population that is aboard the aircraft. A plane may consist of elderly people and babies that may be of higher risks than most of us. Some may have special conditions and some maybe just as annoyed as others. This technology, I believe is very young and we still have a lot of things to learn about it. If this will be proven safe and would absolutely pose no harm to anybody within the aircraft, then we could still fight to amend this prohibition. 2. Describe...

Words: 2792 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Racial Disparity and the Death Penalty

...Racial Disparity and the Death Penalty Jeanine Clark PHI 103 Namoi Sanderovsky July 2, 2012 Penalty Racial Disparity and the Death Penalty We should, generally, want fairness in all areas of public policy. We should especially want fairness with regard to the death penalty, since the stakes are so high. Yet the opponents of the death penalty make a most peculiar argument about fairness. They argue that if the death penalty is not administered fairly, and especially not administered with racial fairness, it must be abolished. Nobody would even think of trying to apply this principle in a consistent way. If we find that black neighborhoods get less police protection than white neighborhoods, would we withdraw cops from both black and white neighborhoods? If banks are discriminating against black home buyers in mortgage lending, would we demand they stop all mortgage lending? If we find the IRS discriminating against middle-class and poor taxpayers, would we want to abolish the IRS? The first question, of course, is whether the death penalty is administered unfairly. Among right-thinking, politically correct people, the phrase “racial unfairness” is a mere tautology. It is difficult to imagine that anything in American society is administered with racial fairness. But, in fact, the opponents of capital punishment have both a “mass market” version of the racial disparity argument and a “specialist” version, and the two versions are flatly...

Words: 1875 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Research

...who voted against President Obama in the last election. The US Supreme Court will hear the case of King v. Burwell on March 4, 2015, and decide whether enrollees in federal exchanges of Obama Care will be allowed to keep their government subsidies. If the challenge is successful, researchers found that nearly 6.3 million Americans who obtained coverage through federal exchanges could lose their tax credits. According to the article Obamacare enrollees who are white, live in the South and have jobs with modest incomes would be disproportionately affected by an adverse ruling for Obama at the high court which could come this June, The study by Urban Institute researchers found (Mangan, Janu). This article seems to point out the variance in attitudes toward the Affordable Care Act and hints that these differences are broken down between political and racial lines. It makes subtle points that if you are a white middle-class Republican you may lose your healthcare if this bill is passed. Mangan writes in the article that every state in the south, with the exception of Florida and Virginia, voted for the Republican challenger Romney over the incumbent Obama in 2012. Support for Romney was particularly strong among white residents in that region (Mangan, Janu). This upcoming Supreme Court case could be gigantic, and one of the most important decisions handed down by the high court in decades. The Supreme Court case hinges on a purported legal distinction between a federally...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Outline

...Outline + References Sociology 210 Research Paper Draft Conflict Theory and the Evolution of Eugenics in America during the 20th Century. I intend to present a purely informative paper on the sociological perspective of eugenics during the past century in the United States through Conflict Theory. A linear history of causality, implementation, and significance. 1. Conflict Theory Perspective a. Margaret Sanger b. Plato’s Republic c. Negative Eugenics d. Sterilization e. Planned Parenthood Federation of America f. Legislation g. Economic Implications Early 1900’s American political movement under Margaret Sanger 1. advocate the control over individual rights to reproduction 2. purpose of societal advantage 3. rights governed by the state and supported by a public majority 4. originally designed as a method of public oppression and controlled persecution. 5. Sanger an outspoken advocate for Eugenics a. racial dominance, class restraint, and a member of the American Eugenic Political Party, opened a family planning and birth control clinic. 6. Established first Abortion Clinics in NY b. On October 16, 1916, a member of the Eugenic party movement opened a then privately funded business, now partly funded by the public, in New York City. 7. clinic’s policy on providing pregnancy termination to the impoverished and uneducated. 8. The Birth Control Review and Birth Control...

Words: 1516 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Pols 1336 Notes

...based on you opinion * a 2000 study of undergraduates showed that 64% did not trust the government Why do we care if people are turning out to vote? * Voter turnout is a sign of political efficacy as well as engagement * People who are engaged are more informed, more likely to communicate with their representatives, more likely to advocate for their interests, and hold public officials accountable for their actions. Political culture * The people’s collective beliefs and attitudes about government and political processes * What is it that binds us together as Americans? * Our political ideologies * Our political values – liberty, capitalism, equality, consent of the governed, individualism Ideology * Political ideology is an integrated system of ideas or beliefs about political values in general and the role of the government in particular * Ideology provides a framework for thinking about politics and policy preferences Ideologies * Modern liberalism is associated with ideas of liberty and political equality: * Tend to favor chance in social, political and economic realms to better protect individuals and produce equality What is the constitution? * Fundamental principles of a government and the basic structures and procedures Two US Constitutions * Articles of confederation ( 1781-1789) * Constitution of the united states (1789-present) Events leading up to the US constitution * By the 18th century...

Words: 2355 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

New York Times

...Case Study The New York Times Company Shared Services Center – Norfolk, Virginia, USA The New York Times Company looks to Fluke Networks’ EtherScope™ Network Assistant to bring visibility to missioncritical networks The weight of the world is on The New York Times Company to not only deliver up-to-the-minute news and information around the planet via The New York Times and The Boston Globe, but also to distribute news through their other news communications media. The company operates 21 regional newspapers, 8 network-affiliated television stations, three magazines and two New York City radio stations along with a news photo and graphic services group. Needless to say, a network hiccup could bring this vital flow of information to a screeching halt – something The New York Times ’ IT group keeps an ever-watchful eye on to prevent. The IT group works out of the Shared Services Center in Norfolk, Virginia, where personnel manage accounting, benefits, human resources and IT services for the company’s nearly 5000 employees. All of Shared Services’ data rides on two frame relay networks that serve 6800 nodes and provide internet access for the entire company’s operations. With an eye toward being more proactive, the IT group has developed a more automated problem detection process utilizing HP OpenView. This allows them to see trends early on and gauge utilization on all circuits. If hardware goes down, they know about it before it causes a problem at the site. Although they’re...

Words: 1074 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Writ of Habeas Corpus

...the exact origins are not really known. Even though the origin of Habeas Corpus is unknown it has been used in Europe for centuries. Its principle that has been used since the middle ages by various writs (http://www.slate.com). Habeas Corpus has evolved and changed a bit over the years, but it has basically remained the same. Habeas Corpus states that a person who has been arrested or in custody be brought before a court. Habeas Corpus has been used in the United States since the beginning of the American Revolutionary War. The Writ of Habeas Corpus was established by the British and was generally regarded as part of the fundamental protections guaranteed by law to each citizen (http://www.slate.com). Article I, Section 9 of the US Constitution guarantees the availability of the writ of habeas corpus...

Words: 1905 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Deth Penalty

...certain cases. My personal opinion on the death penalty is it should be administered only in cases of particularly cruel crimes, or serial crimes such as serial murder. Groups that support the death penalty often say that is a deterrent for future criminals who are thinking of committing murders or other heinous crimes. I disagree with this statement because criminals do not think of the consequences of their actions when they are committing a crime, nor do they care. Amnesty International, which opposes the death penalty, reports that scientific studies have not produced any conclusive evidence showing that capital punishment is a deterrent for future crimes to be committed. I believe the only deterrent for a murderer to not commit a crime again would be execution. Various people who are opposed to the death penalty say that capital punishment condemns the innocent to die. According Amendment V in the United States Bill of Rights, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital crime, or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentment of an indictment of a grand jury” (except in military cases). While it is true that a few innocent people have “slipped through the cracks” of the justice system and been convicted and executed unfairly, it is extremely rare that this type of situation would happen. By the time that all appeals are exhausted, it is most likely that the attorneys will find new evidence to support alleged criminal’s innocence from examining the case so many...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Same-Sex Marriage Equality

...those who choose to be with one of the same sex. The Constitution states many of our rights, mainly life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness which no man should be deprived of. The last one, though, being deprived of homosexual and bisexual people; they cannot be married to the one person they truly love which violates their freedoms. There are only nineteen states, according to gaymarriage.procon.org, that have legalized same-sex marriage which are: California, Delaware, Maine, Utah, Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas, Michigan, Arkansas, Idaho, Wisconsin, and Indiana. But in other states, such as: Alaska, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Nebraska, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Kentucky, Kansas, Mississippi, Georgia, Louisiana, and Alabama same sex marriage is not allowed, let alone a civil partnership. You can ask: why should same-sex marriage be legalized? But then, I would ask: who is the person next to you, or you yourself, someone to dictate who marries who? Like the Loving V. Virginia case, they could not be married because of difference of skin color. No matter the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Loving’s marriage was of a man and a woman, both of their rights were being infringed by stopping them from the pursuit of happiness. So, why should two people of the same sex be unable to marry, or raise a family together? Rights used to be based on color of skin, and now they are based on sexual orientation. Marriage...

Words: 691 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Blacks & Interracial Relationships of Marriage, Dating

...regulations regarding interracial relationships and marriages. The United States and its Colonial processors had banned miscegenation centuries ago to prevent mixing of races. In 1667 the first British laws was passed in Maryland to prohibit marriage between Whites and slaves. It also mandated enslavement of any White woman who marries a black man. In 1691 Commonwealth of Virginia bans all interracial marriages and if a White marries a person of color, he or she would be exiled. Maryland soon followed suit. In 1780, Pennsylvania repealed such laws to gradually abolish slavery. in 1843 Massachusetts became second state to repeal miscegenation laws. In 1883, “Pace v. Alabama”, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rules that state-level bans on interracial marriage do not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. constitution. The ruling held for more than 80 years. In 1922, Congress passed the Cable Act, which prohibited marriages between Whites and Blacks and Whites and Asians. In 1964, “McLaughlin Vs Florida” Supreme Court rules that bans on interracial marriages violates 14th amendments. Finally in 1976, Loving Vs Virginia, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned “Pace Vs Alabama”. In 2000 Alabama became the last state to lift this ban. Judice, Cheryl Yvette “Interracial Marriages Between Black Women and White Men” "Social Issues Surrounding Interracial Marriages" Pg 21 -30 Cambria Press 2008 The author has done research on marriages between Blacks and Whites in America and wrote...

Words: 2180 - Pages: 9