Free Essay

Digital Aristotle

In:

Submitted By foolsoftime
Words 1605
Pages 7
A Digital Age of Education

The classroom is the idyllic staple of what education has been for the past hundred years, yet a time is coming where modern technology finally has the potential to replace and supersede the old and ineffective practices of the past. In this day and age we have the all encompassing interlinked system of the internet We schedule our days, navigate through them, and put our trust in the future through the internet. Is it not only natural that we would find a way to use the internet as a tool in bettering ourselves and educating our students. The methodology used in this new digital frontier of education has surpassed the old stagnating lecture hall style of education with a more efficient and fiscally responsible programs and has brought about a new and important way of learning.

While the lecture format of education has proven effective in educating the mass populace, it only could succeed in the format of the group and not the individual. When we think about the ideal form of education, it’s not very difficult to imagine Aristotle tutoring Alexander The Great in ancient Macedonia, the legendary teacher guiding his discussions perfectly to mold and shape Alexander into what he would someday become. This kind of one on one teaching can be considered to be the most perfect style of education, yet it fails for three specific reasons. Firstly, there aren’t enough humans in the world to individually tutor every child born. Secondly, It would be wildly and impossibly expensive. Finally, not every adult would have the knowledge and wisdom of Aristotle. The internet deals with each of these problems directly. The internet ,while extremely cheap to use, is an extremely powerful tool for personalization. While there is no one lesson perfectly ideal for all children, the internet allows us to store thousands of different lessons teaching the very same subject if necessary, which would literally mean that there would be a specific lesson for any type of person. The internet also allows for the such lessons to be massively reviewed by any sort of intellectual or fact checker necessary to grant it a type of skill and knowledge perhaps even as astute as that of Aristotle.

To state the obvious, running a college is expensive. As an example, Kerry Temple, editor of Notre Dame magazine reveals a bit of how much one of the colleges considered a “best value” school, costs to operate. “It costs almost $2.5 million per day to operate the enterprise that is Notre Dame. A student’s tuition covers about two-thirds of the real cost of his or her education, says John Sejdinaj, Notre Dame’s vice president for finance. Tuition, he says, generates about 41 percent of the revenues toward Notre Dame’s $900 million annual budget. The rest comes mainly from various auxiliary operations, gifts, endowment income, grants and contracts.” (Sejdinaj quoted by Temple) This extraordinary yearly budget only covers the universities costs of operation; the students still have to find a way to finance their own food, textbooks, and housing. I reference this yearly budget for the sole purpose of outlining how ridiculous the costsof operating the old lecture hall style of education; the cost has become so incredibly high that student tuition doesn’t even begin to cover it. What does it cost for every student to purchase their own laptop, wifi, and perhaps even give a small chunk to hire educators. There is no researched price point to be found, but it is certainly and clearly lower than the $22,261 per year that the US national college board found to be the average cost of a higher education in the 2012-2013 year.

David Talbot in the MIT technology review described an experiment thought up and executed by the “One Laptop Per Child” organization actually that leaves a crate of digital tablets loaded with educational software in small isolated African villages. The leader of the organization speaks of the results as so, “I thought the kids would play with the boxes. Within four minutes, one kid not only opened the box, found the on-off switch … powered it up. But within five days, they were using 47 apps per child, per day. Within two weeks, they were singing ABC songs in the village, and within five months, they had hacked Android software.” (Talbot) This situation speaks volumes to the power of a digital education. Not only were these children motivated to use the software to learn but by the end of the experiment they had even gone so far as to express their own curiosity through hacking the tablets. Such an experiment is not necessarily an accurate representation of where education is headed, but merely a good indication of what digital learning is capable of.

Many people have their qualms with an online education, but none is so widespread an idea than the lack of teacher to student communication within the lecture hall style of learning. I am here to proudly state that this issue is utterly misunderstood. In an online lecture, the students watch a recorded video and /or sound byte of a teacher's lesson. While impersonal sounding at a glance, this method actually allows for more attention to be paid to the student than less. Many teachers use a note taking submission system, where after listening to the lecture the student then submits his notes as not only a method of tracking attendance but a way for the teacher to be able to actually see how on track their student’s comprehension of the material is. This style of system not only allows for personalized review, it is also a much faster and efficient way of gauge the class's overall understanding as well. To accomplish this there are many readily available keyword checking softwares that can quickly highlight if the students are taking the correct sort of notes, as well as shorten the workload of the professor by the hundred. The potential for such classes allow for a situation where many more students can be actively engaged in a lesson than previously imagined.

There has always been a place where a person who wanted to learn could go and find all the information they would ever need. That place is a library, and although there may be teachers who have an extreme wealth of knowledge, no source of information will ever be as culmative as the thousands of years of information gathering that a library maintains. The elegance of a digital education is pronounced when one truly understands how much information can be obtained through a single keyword search. While old methods of research are not useless, the ability to narrow down search query’s to all things relevant to a single keyword or phrase is beyond convenient.

Of course naturally there is a pretty striking argument to the future of education in the digital format, and that is a historical one. The internet, though vast and unique, isn’t the first form of telecommunication on the verge of breaking into the education industry. Both radio and television which were equally as innovative at the time, have tried and failed at finding a new audience of students. One could argue that the internet is different in that regard due to the fact that the internet allows for back and forth communication that the television does not. According to Matt Novak in of Smithsonian.com: In 1935, New York University professor C. C. Clark conducted a class using a shortwave radio transceiver (a radio that can both send and receive messages) from his home. Because the radio went both ways, Prof. Clark was able to take questions from the class the way an online class would work on the internet. This I would argue is also limited in a way that the internet has overcome. At any point during the time a class isn’t being held, a student may have a question that would have to wait until another period of class time. The internet allows any student anywhere to simply message the teacher in a variety of different formats and get back an answer or help with a problem in a way that no other medium would allow for. There is no argument on whether or not education is important, but the methods and practices used in education are absolutely up for scrutiny. The internet is the most powerful tool that mankind has ever created for information's sake, and where there is information there is in essence also a kind of learning. The cost of an online education is negligible when compared to the gargantuan amount of upkeep associated with running traditional schools. It is time that we as a society grow to adapt our tools for the modern era in an effort to make education as efficient and elegant as we can for future generations come. To this extent, it can be said that no other method is so thorough and encompassing as that of a digital education.

Works Cited

Novak, Matt. "Smithsonian.com." Paleofuture Predictions for Educational TV in the 1930s Comments. Smithsonian Publishing, 29 May 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.

Talbot, David. "Given Tablets but No Teachers, Ethiopian Children Teach Themselves." MIT Technology Review. PaeleoFuture, 29 Oct. 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2013.

Hardmen, Daniel. "College Data." College Data - Paying Your Way. Us.gov, 22 Jan. 2013. Web. 20 Feb. 2013.

Timmerman, Luke. "Digital Aristotle". Xconommy.com, 26 Nov. 2008. Web. 04 Feb. 2013.

Temple, Kerry. "Notre Dame Magazine." Paying the Price // News // // University of Notre Dame. Notre Dame University, Sept.-Oct. 2007. Web. 20 Feb. 2013.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fghfv 7frftu Ig Fgcytfuj

...theology, the soul is further defined as that part of the individual which is thought to survive the death of the body. However, this view point isn’t taken by all. Viewpoints on the soul can be separated into monism, dualism and materialistic views. Aristotle is a monist believing that the body and soul are not linked, whereas Dawkins is a hard materialist believing that biology is the key. Aristotle defined the soul, or psyche, as the ‘first actuality’ of the body and argued against it having a separate existence from the physical body, unlike other philosophers such as Plato. Aristotle’s belief was that the difference between a live body and a corpse is the presence of the soul. When the soul dies, so does the body. In his book, De Anima he stated that “the soul does not exist without a body and yet is not itself a kind of body. For it is not a body, but something which belongs to a body.” In Aristotle’s view, full actualisation of a living thing is its soul. The soul is the form and shape of the body. Aristotle argued that the soul is not a substance like matter because matter can be many different things, but what gives matter its shape and function is its Form. By suggesting that the soul is the Form of the body, Aristotle means that the soul gives form to the matter which is the body. In just the same way that a marble statue is physically a block...

Words: 1420 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Etica

...In Conjunction with  History of Ethics Instructor: Robert Cavalier Teaching Professor Robert Cavalier received his BA from New York University and a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Duquesne University. In 1987 he joined the staff at Carnegie Mellon's Center for Design of Educational Computing (CDEC), where he became Executive Director in 1991. While at CDEC, he was also co-principal in the 1989 EDUCOM award winner for Best Humanities Software (published in 1996 by Routledge as A Right to Die? The Dax Cowart Case). He also coauthored the CD-ROM The Issue of Abortion in America (Rountledge, 1998) Dr. Cavalier was Director of CMU's Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics and Political Philosophy from 2005-2007. He currently directs the Center's Digital Media Lab which houses Project PICOLA (Public Informed Citizen Online Assembly), and is also co-Director of Southwestern Pennsylvania Program for Deliberative Democracy. Co-Editor of Ethics in the History of Western Philosophy (St. Martin's/Macmillan, England, 1990), Editor of The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives (SUNY, 2003) and other works in ethics as well as articles in educational computing, Dr. Cavalier is internationally recognized for his work in education and interactive multimedia. He was President of the "International Association for Computing and Philosophy" (2001 - 2004) and Chair of the APA Committee on Philosophy and Computers (2000-2003). Dr. Cavalier has given numerous addresses and keynote speeches here...

Words: 14800 - Pages: 60

Premium Essay

Is It Dangerous for Politics to Define Science?

...Is it dangerous for Politics to define Science? Political discourses entail following cultural and unwritten behaviors, which in most cases are driven by organizational and personal agendas, aimed at attaining particular objectives. The need to practice politics effectively has led to the emergence of political science, which covers the study of governments, political systems and process, and political policies. On the other hand, science refers to a methodical approach that is used in understanding the natural world (McLelland 1). Science is one of the most fundamental disciplines that can be relied upon in an effort to transform the society through effective decision-making. This observation arises from the fact that, science leads to the formulation of scientific theories, which are comprehensive and well-integrated set of facts. The objective of this paper is to analyze if there are any dangers to this effect. The credibility of scientific ‘facts’ arises from the construct that, the facts are repeatedly tested and accepted, thus increasing their effectiveness in making predictions on certain natural phenomena. McLelland posits, “Science is a human endeavor, which subjects it to bias, misapprehensions, and personal prejudices” (4). This argument is in line with the assumption that humans can accurately observe and measure a given phenomenon in an effort to understand the universe. However, the conclusions arrived at by humans is limited by how effective they can make sense...

Words: 916 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Aristotle: Eudaimana

...Aristotle believed all human activities are aimed at “eudaimonia” or happiness. He believed that what makes human beings distinct from other living things is our capacity for rational behaviour, gaining knowledge and acting on reasons. He believed to live a good life is to live a life of practical knowledge and that this is similar to living a life of virtue. Aristotle concluded that a virtue is a learned disposition to reason and act in a certain way. Virtues are habits of mind that move us towards a good life. Virtue ethics, its most famous form from Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, focus on what sort of people we should strive to be and not just that things we should do on individual occasions. Moral dilemmas are usually situations in which there are two choices to make, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. Hence in business, virtue ethics requires leaders to act in a way that they will increase their contributions to the good life. All business leaders will inevitably face moral dilemmas. In navigating through these dilemmas, virtue ethics and reason tell the business leaders to follow the character traits that upon, contemplation and reflection, they view as consistent with virtue. An art director, with a team of designers and illustrators, overseeing the promotion efforts of their new toy is “strongly” persuaded by his boss to “borrow” copyrighted design material and schematics from another overseas toy firm. His boss...

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Plato

...Plato’s Rule of Man vs Aristotle’s Rule of Law Commonalities between them • Democracy as a form of governance is not only synonymous with rule of law, but also the most effective in enforcing law itself. • The law is subject to all individuals, whether part of the polis or a member of government. • Law according to both is constant and absolute Plato’s Rule of Men Historical Context • Understand that Plato’s opinion on democracy was largely influenced by the manner in which Socrates, his teacher, was put on trial and sentenced to death under the Athenian democracy. He thus concluded based on this experience that democracy is the most corrupt and unjust form of government. • Plato thus set out in his work, Republic to examine the meaning of justice, assess different types of government and then outlining his idea of the ideal state. He examined oligarchy, in which the poor would eventually overthrow the rich, democracy which would be set up by the victorious poor but flawed on the fact that the unquenchable desire for limitless liberty causes disorder and pits the poor against the rich who the poor perceive as plotting against the hence they seek protection. In tyranny, no outside governing power controls the tyrant’s selfish behavior. Only law to Plato can guard against tyranny-the law serves as the external authority. His thoughts on law • Where the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its own, the collapse of the state in my view is not far off, but...

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explain Plato’s Analogy of the Cave. (25 Marks)

...Explain Plato’s analogy of the cave. (25 marks) The analogy of the cave is written in Plato’s famous book known as Republic. It is one of the three similes he uses to illustrate his theory of Forms. Plato uses analogy to help describe philosophical difference between physical world and the difference of the world of forms. In short the analogy explains to others about the physical world as nothing but full of illusion. He describes the true reality is to be found in the eternal unchanging world of forms. The analogy begins in the cave. The cave represents the visible world or the world of sense experience, where the shadows seem more real than truth itself. It indirectly represents the human body, which imprisons the soul preventing it from seeking the true knowledge. People are chained up in the cave such a way that all prisoners are facing the wall. They are chained up in a way that they can only look ahead of them at the wall of the cave. The only light in the cave comes from the fire. There is a wall behind the prisoners and fire is located behind the wall. Behind the wall other people are walking up and down carrying statues on their heads. The prisoners observe the shadows that flicker before them. The prisoners believe the shadows are reality as that is all they are able to see. If they hear the people behind the wall they associate the sounds made by individuals with the shadows. They think of the shadows as the true reality. Plato represents our condition as human...

Words: 879 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Organizational Politics

...XBCOM/230 Organizational Politics Check Point Week 6 The definition of organizational politics is the use of power within an organization for the pursuit of agendas and self-interest without regard to their effect on the organization’s efforts to achieve its goals (Businessdictionary.com). Organizational politics does not only have to come from an individual but it can come from a group within the organization. All organizations have some sort of a political environment, but not all of it has to be bad. If you know how to play the politics of your organization, it can work in your favor and help to open communication. By being able to read the environment that you are in, you will have a better understanding of the rules and how to play on them. This balance act of trying to understand the rules of office politics affects communication because you need to try and figure out when would be a good time for you to act. You may need to keep your eye open to learn some of the likes and dislikes of coworkers or even manager so that in speaking to them you can communicate more on their level and have less negative conversations thus helping yourself in what you are trying to achieve. The communication with organizational politics is something that can be subjective. What one person may consider being an alliance, the other person may consider it to be a friendship. In the end all organizations have politics, knowing how to play the game and understand that it exists will help...

Words: 265 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Average English People Living in North America

...In politics, average English people living in North America think colonies are independent from Britain. Especially after the Glorious Revolution happens, individual colonies re-establish, which shows their intention to be separated from the British’s government. They regard themselves as American but not English. However typical English people still think Britain is taking control of the colonies in America and they think that English people living in colonies are inferior to them. Furthermore, their opinions about government are quite different either. English people in North America think that government should not be related with churches, which means church membership should not interfere with government’s decisions. They share the idea that land ownership, not church membership is required to vote. And they think it’s fairer to elect governors than appoint. But on the other hand, typical English people hold the opinion that bishops have the authority to participate in the politics and it’s all right for them to make important decisions. They think religion membership can be parts of the government. In religion, average English people living in North America think that there’s possibility for religion diversity. Like the Quaker Liberty, they believe that liberty is a universal entitlement and religious freedom is a fundamental principle. People shouldn’t be punished if their religions are different than others. However, typical English people still have no tolerance for...

Words: 406 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Nothing

...What i think is the bad influence of the old corrupted Politics practice made these University Students protesting the current emergency state of Bangladesh. I should request to the authorities to think about Banning the Student Politics in Bangladesh for next few years. The old fashion Student Politics Practice could be the main seed of facing the corrupted Politicians in future. There are 3 types of Student in any University or College: * A type: Career Oriented (focused only in study and career issues) * B type: Mid-type Student (they needs proper guidance about their career) * C type: Politics Oriented Students (who always prefer the Politics Involvement rather then Career) In usual scenario we loosed the fame and name of Dhaka University just for the reason of our Bad Political Practice which was practiced by the C Type students. And sometimes B type students were the ultimate victim of the Fight of C Type Students and Security Forces in different Protests. From my past experience B type students gets the influence or sometimes forced to support the C Type students. Which makes the ratio of protesting supporters increases than the usual ratio of C type students. Then the conflict seems more strong and bold to different media. Even the media influences in any activities needs to be monitored cause a Public focus is very much influencing for those C type students. Sometimes you will see only to show their face in medias for different protest or awareness...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Prime Mover

...Compare the concept of God as a prime mover to the idea of him as a craftsman If we were to accept the concept of God as a prime mover we would then have to accept that while God created humanity, he really wants nothing to do with it. If we were to accept the contrasting view of him as a craftsman then we have to accept that God created us for a reason and wants to forma relationship with us, this has its negativites however. IF we accept that then we must accept that all atrocities that have occurred have happened and God has no qualms with it happening. The support for viewing God as a creator comes from the Book of Genesis. The mention of God in this book has led to the belief that God created the world “ex nihilo” or out of nothing. In Genesis it is also implied that God wants to have a relationship with his creation because he has given them a list of commands to follow (the Ten Commandments.) This draws a parallel with the Aristotelian idea of God as more of a prime mover. This would make God an external agent working with matter, nor is he an agent over against other agents. This two ideas contrast here because if God were to not be against other agents, he would not have banished Lucifer, as it is told in the bible. Another point of conflict between these two ideas of God lies in the problem of evil. If we accept the traditional idea of God as a master craftsman we must accept that he himself made all things in the world and therefore they must be perfect. This...

Words: 885 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Book Review: Courtesans and Fishcakes

...Courtesans and Fishcakes written by James Davidson explore the ancient Greek culture of the Athenians and elaborate on not only the desire for sex, but the appetites of life. Author James Davidson is a professor in the Department of Classics and Ancient History at the University of Warwick. In his biography, it says that he is a regular contributor to the London Review of Book and the author of the award winning The Greeks and Greek Love. Courtesans and Fishcakes is divided into four parts: Feasts, Desire, The Citizen, and The City. Within each part of the book, there are multiple sub-sections that go into depth about the particular section of each ‘chapter’. In Part I: Feasts, Davidson goes into some background of the ancient Greek culture of Athens, and their preferences of eating and drinking. In Part II: Desires, Davidson talks about the interactions between men and women, and the purchase and selling of sex. Also included in Courtesans and Fishcakes are multiple maps of Athens and ancient art work including pottery and paintings. Part III: The Citizen explains the characteristics of the different types of people that are living in Athens. Also explained in Part III is the economic situation as it relates to fish, drink, and sex. In Part IV: The City, Davidson brushes over the Politics and Society, Politics and Politicians, and the Tyranny and Revolution in ancient Greek culture. In his final section, Davidson explains the different classes in Athens by also explaining the...

Words: 1251 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Jwhqjhq;

...helps the material efficient formal and final causes to come into play. 2) “the prime mover “being eternal, substance and actuality”” 1. Aristotle’s idea of the Prime Mover is explained in this quote form the book Metaphysics to be “eternal”- forever living, “substance”- a particular kind of matter with uniform properties. And “actuality”- the state of existing in reality. 3) The Prime mover “moves without being moved” and “produces motion by being loved”, This shows that the relationship between the prime mover and the world is that everything in the world is attracted to the prime mover and aspires to be like it but they can’t reach their because the prime mover exists out of time and space therefore it cannot move. 4) Aristotle...

Words: 443 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Friends

...or changing our contemporary notion of friendship by these social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, MySpace and LinkedIn. If so, what are the implications for life as we know it? Will we be happier? Humans are social beings, ever since we are born links are created, first with our family then with other people close to us, some of them start to become important to us and with maturity friendship starts to arise. Nowadays social interaction became even bigger with globalization, communication became more immediate, but yet more superficial. As a result, trying to define the word friend became a much more complex task than it was years earlier. According to the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle the definition of friend is "A single soul dwelling in two bodies." Aristotle wrote widely about the conception and importance of true friendship as a determinant of meaningful living. However his definition of friend is definitely not the one we are having these days through social media, the concept of personal and face to face interactions seems to be less important as time goes by and social media takes over. Social media plays a big role in our daily life; we keep in touch with our loved ones and get to know about what others are doing “enhancing” our social lives. However, this make us think about how real and meaningful is our social life on the web. The people we pretend to be on social media is not the ones we are on real life, this being one of the major issue...

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Euthyphro

...Euthyphro In this essay I will explain the concept of the holiness emerges and why it takes a prominent position in the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro. I will also explain the three definitions that Euthyphro uses in his response to Socrates and then present Socrates’s refutation of each of Euthyphro definitions. Also this essay will test my ability to develop my own argument as to what I think Socrates’s goal is in this dialogue. How do you know that is his goal? What features of the dialogue align his goals? I will also give own definition of piety/holiness and then take on the role of Socrates and respond to my own definition as I think he would. Plato conversation set close to the king Archon court were Socrates and Euthrophy cross words. The conversation surround Socrates trying to understand the concept of how gods see piety and impious in mankind. The debate between Socrates and Euthrophy is that Socrates wants a new form of definition for pious and impious needs to man needs to be judge by man not from god’s justice. The concept of holiness explain how to be devout religiously not the act of being love. The conversation emphasize the true meaning of piety and impiety, and important conversation between Socrates and Euthrophy took place because Socrates does not believe in tales mythology and Socrates would like a more reasonable answer to all his questions. At the end of the conversation both Socrates and Euthrypho concluded that holiness as something...

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Aristotle V. Plato

...So last night I did some playing around on a philosophy assignment. I had to do a dialogue between Plato and Aristotle. I call onto all experts, and those that enjoy the subject to read it and tell me what you think. Here it is…. Epitaphs Plato v.Aristotle Plato: Aristotle, may I ask you why you disagree with my theory of forms? Can you explain, or reveal your thoughts as to why? Better yet, express a theory you could replace my theory with. Aristotle: Sure, do you mind answering some questions for me? Just to confirm my understanding of your theory. Plato: Certainly. Aristotle: Is it safe to assume that the way you define the word ‘form’ in your theory of forms is synonymous with the word ideas? Plato: Yes. Aristotle: Ideas are perfect as long as they are in your mind. Would you agree with that statement? Plato: Yes, I would agree with that statement. Aristotle: This could be taken a step forward, a step so far that even you will disagree with it. Would you like to hear my progression based on your theory? Plato: Sure. Aristotle: According to your theory of form every idea a person has is perfect, and every attempt to bring life to that idea is imperfect. Is that right? Plato: Yes it is. I’ve said this before. Aristotle: Do you realize that someone could very well take your theory and assume you are insulting the Gods, or at the very least someone could interpret it in that way. Plato: What do you mean? You believe that I imply that God’s...

Words: 829 - Pages: 4