Premium Essay

Eth316 Week One

In:

Submitted By rieodeal
Words 538
Pages 3
Ethics is about what people should do and not about the facts of the matters. Many businesses today see ethics as a determining factor in the hiring process. Ethics are important in peoples work and everyday lives. Having good values and morals can assist in the achievement of success. Ethics has three different theories which are virtue ethics theory, utilitarianism, and deontological. The three theories have some similarities and are also unique. The first of the theories that will be compared is virtue theory. Virtue ethics is a character based theory. It puts emphasis on high moral character and would do things that are altruistic. Virtue ethics highlights moral character unlike the deontological theory, which highlights consequences of action. Someone with virtue ethics can be considered to be morally sound or righteous. It can also be considered a bad trait (Hursthouse, Rosalind, 2013). Dealing with deontological ethics theory highlights duties and rules, moral obligation, and right actions (“Collins English Dictionary”, 2009). It can be said that people who are deontologist believe in treating people the way they would like to be treated. A deontologist separates moral principle from consequences. If their moral duty is to tell the truth, then it is morally wrong to lie. Unlike the deontologist, a utilitarian believes that happiness for the larger number of people is what matters. Utilitarianism sees human nature as seeking for desire. Utilitarianism is known as the consequence theory. A utilitarian believes as long as the outcome is over-all happiness, it is right. It is also known to appeal to common sense. Utilitarianism is known as the substitute for deontology (“Anglefire, 2013). Although the three theories have similarities, they are also all unique. The similarities are that they are based on doing the right thing. Some people

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Eth316 Week 1 Individual

...ETH316 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT John Sisk ETH316 Nov 7, 2012 Edward D’Avola ETH316 WEEK 1 ASSIGNMENT Ethics theories Virtue theory, utilitarianism and deontological ethics are similar in that they each represent how morality and ethics is judged. They differ by judging different aspects of what is right or best. Each has a unique definition and can be used in different situations to determine if decisions were made ethically (Boylan, 2009). Virtue theory Virtue ethics is the view that you should try cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do. Physicians’ continuing education on the latest procedures in order to best serve their patients would be an example of virtue ethics. Virtue ethics is a way to look at someone’s character development over a period of time a project, career or perhaps a lifetime (Boylan, 2009). Utilitarianism Putting the good of the group ahead of an individual is utilitarianism. Where virtue ethics judges individual achievements, utilitarianism says the individual acts ethically if their actions benefit the group even though it may not be good for everyone. When offered a promotion at work if one was to step aside and suggest another that may be better suited for the job would be an example of utilitarianism (Boylan, 2009). Deontological There is not one single deontological theory but Kant is held as the standard by many. Deontological ethics judges morality based on one’s obedience to rules. Kant believed that nothing in...

Words: 440 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Eth 316 Final Paper

...Ethics Final ETH/316 10/06/2013 In Ethics 316 we discussed what it means to not only be ethical but what it means to be socially responsible. In the next few pages we will be looking more in depth week by week on what ethical theories are, what it means to be socially responsible, and how something could be ethical but not legal. Ethical Theories During our first week we looked at Ethical Theories which included deontological ethics, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. To go through and brake down each one individually would take way to long, so instead we will be looking more into Utilitarianism. To be able to discuss Utilitarianism we first need to understand what it is. According to Michael Boylan Basic Ethics, Second Edition (2009), “Utilitarianism is a theory that suggests that an action is morally right when that action produces more total utility for the group than any other alternative. Sometimes this has been shortened to the slogan, “The greatest good for the greatest number.” All ethics play some part in what we consider right and wrong, but Utilitarianism also looks at cause and effect. We see cause and effect in our everyday lives with the decisions we make even at a subconscious level. In business we look at what will benefit not only the business but ourselves and compare it to the outcome to determine if it will benefit what we are trying to achieve. A basic way to look at it would be “If I work hard and show them I am capable of not only...

Words: 2673 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ethics Review

...Ethics Review Team B reviewed the Ethics Game Simulation and the Ethic Responsibility Project completed individually by members of team B during week three of ETH/316. Each team member has provided a review of there findings. Stephen Stephen completed the ethics game simulation’s two scenarios. The first scenario had to do with sexual harassment and the second scenario had to do with falsified data for a potential product. Both scenarios seemed simple on the surface, but once further research was conducted the answers to each scenario became a little more difficult. The scenarios took Stephen through a process to achieve the desired result and explained why things needed to be don’t in a certain way. For example, a big decision is to analyze all the information a then make a decision what is the first thing to do. For the first scenario, the first thing to do figure out what the problem is which meant talking to the female worker and explaining that all attempts would be made to keep her information confidential, however dependent on the allegations that it may not be completely possible. The next step was to find out who the primary stakeholders were. This was a difficult task for the author that prompted a review of outline materials referencing ethical stakeholders. The ethical lens was used to determine what the author should do initially was the Rights and Responsibilities Lens (Ethics game, 2007). The rights and responsibilities lens allowed the author to look at...

Words: 2672 - Pages: 11