Premium Essay

Federalist Thesis

Submitted By
Words 830
Pages 4
Federalist Papers #10

Thesis:
In the Federalist Papers #10, James Madison argues that the United States needs a stronger central government than that of the one outlined in the Articles of Confederation in order to ensure that the country will be safe from the violence of factions.

Evidence:
James Madison evidently supports his thesis by explaining the problem with the government summarized in the Articles of Confederation as well as by focusing on the need for a powerful primary leadership within the states. Due to the fact that the United Stated had recently separated itself from the tyranny of Great Britain, the Articles of Confederation was created to portray a government that is too weak to be practical. Madison states that there …show more content…
Evidence:
With Great Britain’s unjust rule still fresh in his mind, Henry clearly voices his major concerns about granting more power to a central leadership. One argument he had against it was that there was an uncertain chance that all the states would rightfully get represented in government. Since the only requirement for representatives was that there had to be at least one form each state, there’s no guarantee that there would be multiple for each state. This is an issue because one person cannot speak on behalf of an entire state. Moreover, permitting this government to have a national army could severely backfire on the civilians. The aggression from the British army were toward the colonists before the American Revolutions shows that history could repeat itself if this army is controlled by the wrong people. Additionally, the Constitution makes it difficult to pass amendments due to their majority rule. There is a two-thirds agreement rule for Congress when establishing amendments, meaning that a small percentage of members could easily decline an amendment that would be beneficial for the greater good of the country. America needs to maintain it’s weak government, or else they will lose the all of the liberty and rights …show more content…
Henry’s piece consistently shuts down any reasoning to hand over power to the central government by repeatedly bringing up the risks of doing so, and by using their history with Great Britain as an example that they should learn from. His main criticism with the new Constitution is that it doesn’t guarantee that the people will be properly represented in this government and that the power of the people will be too weak to fight against possible corruption. If the voices of the citizens aren’t acknowledged, the leaders could easily exploit their powers and essentially destroy a nation that was once free. All in all, throughout Patrick Henry’s Speech, he helped me visualize the problems with putting the new Constitution into

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Federalism

...Federalism supports a strong government and actually benefits our country by changing the government. While the anti-federalists claim to want to improve the government, but instead puts powers into the hands of the states. A centralized government that “is a system of democratic rules and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and provincial/state governments, creating what is often called a federation.” Even giving the constitution a certain amount of power, it created a method of checks and balances to prevent dictatorship. Anti-federalists wanted to the states to have more power than the centralized government. The anti-federalist view what would’ve led this country into pure corruption. The federalist, however, covered this view by thinking about it’s people by adding their opinions and covering the worries. This country needs a system of rules to live upon or else the people of this country wouldn’t know what’s hurting or benefiting it from destruction. The federalists favored limited state power. Local control was key to anti-federalist concept of democracy. Which would heat up state’s right fights in the 1800’s. For example, the anti-federalists were favored in the New Jersey Plan rather than the federalists choosing the Virginia Plan giving more power to the states like they favored. Yes, the anti-federalists believe that we should be working together as a whole. Not state by state, it is “We the People” not “We the Divided”. ...

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Federalist V Anti

...living somewhere safe and economically secure. And when it comes to who should be the one in charge of making big changes or passing law, it should be someone that really knows about politics and the economy, someone that will not be biased. And that would be federalist; they are true politicians, people who truly have the knowledge to direct Florida and all the other states to a better place with a strong central government in charge. I see it like this you don’t want a garbage man that has no knowledge as your doctor, you want someone that has knowledge in that field, it’s the same with politics. John Adam stated that “government is instituted for the common good; for the perfection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family or class of man….” Federalist were business men, and wanted a central government because of equality they wanted the states to all have the same right not one be more powerful because of their size or any other quality. By Adams saying this he also was saying that sometimes people want to lead to have an advantage and for their own good, but by having a central government that wouldn’t happen. Anti-federalist believed that anyone could be a representative but if you really think about it that incorrect because people that really don’t know about politics could say something is right but only see it in the point of view that it would help them and not really analyze...

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

How to Save Money from Allowance

...to organize your thoughts and arguments. A good outline can make conducting research and then writing the paper very efficient. Your outline page must include your: * Paper Title * Thesis statement * Major points/arguments indicated by Roman numerals (i.e., I, II, III, IV, V, etc.) * Support for your major points, indicated by capital Arabic numerals (i.e., A, B, C, D, E, etc.)   Roman numeral I should be your “Introduction”. In the introduction portion of your paper, you’ll want to tell your reader what your paper is about and then tell what your paper hopes to prove (your thesis). So an Introduction gives an overview of the topic and your thesis statement.   The final Roman numeral should be your “Conclusion”. In the conclusion, you summarize what you have told your reader.   Following are 3 sample outlines, from actual student papers. YOUR outline can be MORE detailed, or might be LESS detailed. Remember that a good outline makes writing easier and more efficient.   Sample Outline #1  Title: Frederick Douglass Thesis: Frederick Douglass played a crucial role in securing the abolition of slavery and equality of African-American rights through his actions, ideas, and efforts as a lecturer, author/publisher, and politician.                I.     Introduction A.    Thesis B.    Roles/Arguments             II.     Douglass as Lecturer A.    History as slave and acquisition of education 1)     He “experienced slavery” 2)     Literacy allowed expression B.    Early...

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Government

...Federalist Articles James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay were the authors of the federalist papers. James Madison was the principle author for article No 10 and article No 51. The immediate purpose for publishing these papers were to obtain support for the ratification of the Constitution, they wanted a diverse republic to prevent faction but with equality to maintain unity among the states. Madison addresses that a large faction will provide better representatives, since the cause of faction has been the unequal distribution of property. Those who have property versus those who don’t, have ever had different interest in society. He saw direct democracy as a danger to individual rights and addressed for a representative democracy to protect individual liberty from majority rule. In federalist No 10 Madison discusses to guard against factions, or groups of citizens, how the passion and interest of one group could mean a danger to the government. In article No 51 the purpose is for four aspects: Layered representation which is the people that are elected directly or indirectly to represent other people, Separation of powers are the three branches that make, and enforce the law; judicial, executive, and legislative branches, Checks and balancing is the ability of each branch to check the powers of the others so the power is balance in all three branches, and Federalism which is the existence of two governments, state and federal and both governments have dominance over...

Words: 869 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Anti-Federalist

... I am a supporter of the anti-federalist party. The anti-federalist took some of the ideas that the federalist had into consideration. Instead of abolishing or ignoring these ideas, they wanted to improve them. The anti-federalist and the federalist share two very opposing views. As you read this essay, you will gradually start to see just how my ideas are being supported as to why I've chosen to become an anti-federalist. The anti-federalist party was the first out of two political parties of the U.S. This party was led by Henry, George Mason and Samuel Adams alongside Richard Henry Lee who wanted the president and the senate to have the entire executive and 2/3 of the legislative power. As an anti-federalist, I believe that the constitution should not be ratified. I feel like the best way, that the U.S citizens should be protected is by being kept safe from the Government and the bill of rights will do that because of the freedom and liberty that it gives us. "The greatest importance for Freemen to retain themselves are the liberties given to us in the bill of rights", which is why it's so important that we'd add it to the constitution. In order to get the bill of rights to be in the constitution we'd need to sacrifice part of our natural rights, for the good of others around us. The anti-federalist believed that the constitution should have a bill of rights. The Anti-federalist opposed the constitution, while the federalist themselves favored it. The federalist's...

Words: 836 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Federalist 10 Essay

...During the ratification process of the United States Constitution, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay published a series of anonymous articles in the New York Times. Published under the name Publius, "The Federalist Papers," as they were called, advocated for the ratification of the new Constitution by New York State. Each of the papers, therefore, outlines the benefits of one united nation, as well as the interests of, and supported by, the proposed government. Written by Madison, Federalist Paper No. 10, generally considered one of the most important articles, concerns itself with the problems of and plausible solutions for the formation of factions. Through multiple assertions concerning the dangers of factions and the benefits of a republic, Madison formed one of the major arguments in favor of the United States Constitution. Federalist No. 10, titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection," expanded on dangers of factions outlined by Hamilton in Federalist No. 9. Defined by Madison as, "A number of citizens, whether amounting to a minority or majority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community" (Madison), factions are comparable to the modern day interest or lobby groups. That is to say, Madison defined factions as groups of people with...

Words: 1377 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

2.03 Assessment

...helpful to complete this Activity on Argument Writing before you begin. Steps Choose whether to argue as a Federalist or as an Anti-Federalist. Review the lesson to make sure you understand their main points. Using quotes from the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, write an opinion article for a newspaper, or create a speech podcast to convince people in your state to agree with your position. Include the following in your speech or article: teens shaking hands after playing a game of tennis © 2012 Polka Dot/Thinkstock introductory paragraph that clearly states your position as a Federalist or Anti-Federalist at least two paragraphs describing differences between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist points of view. Use at least two quotes from each of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers. If you would like to explore more of the Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Papers to find your own quotes, these sites will be helpful. Federalist Papers American Studies at the University of Virginia The Avalon Project at Yale Law School The Law Center at the University of Oklahoma Anti-Federalist Papers Document Library by Teaching American History at least one paragraph to explain why you disagree with the opposing stance. For example, if you have chosen to argue as a Federalist, you will explain why you disagree with the Anti-Federalist position, using quotes from the documents to support your argument. strong concluding paragraph that summarizes...

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Revolutionary Characters

...Revolutionary Characters Gordan S. Woods Revolutionary characters, iis a compliation of essays and articles written over time by Gordan s. Woods. He was trying to teach his audience that our four fathers were a group of unique elite men that wanted to ensure our freedom, and our fatih in God. Wood believed that they were a group of self-made aristocrats that came together as a product of their time and vision for America's future. The founders derived a governemnt powered by its people that relied on a disinterested group of citizens to lead them forward. In order to elect the right leaders to run our country they felt our citizens needed to be educated, and have morals bassed on christianity. “As long as this Republic endures, he ought to be first in the hearts of his countrymen. Washington was truly a great man, and the greatest president we ever had.” Gordan S. Woods felt it necessary to start his book with George Washington, our first president. Woods goes on to say that it wasnt WAshington's intellect or writing ability that made him a great leader and set him apart from all others, it was his character. WAshington quickly realized the important of his position. He realized that his reputaiton would become indistinguishable from that of the government he would bring about. Washington was completely honest and refused a salary for his postion as commander and chief and president.Even before being elected as president he made sure to guard his reputation. It is easy...

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Is Alexander Hamilton Important

...Even though his family was abandoned by his father and stepfather and his mother died when he was a little boy he still tried his hardest and worked up until he was able to make something of himself. He later was able to help write the Federalist papers with John Jay and James Madison. He was also appointed the first Secretary of the Treasury by George Washington himself. Both Hamilton and J.K Rowling went through some hard things throughout their lives, but were able to persevere through them and ended out on top. Alexander Hamilton was all in all a very important founding...

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Two-Party Politics

...Associate Level Material Appendix D Two-Party Politics Part 1: Matrix Complete the matrix by describing the beliefs and ideals of each of the parties. Generate a list of at least 10 of President Jefferson’s decisions and actions. Decide which party’s ideals are most aligned with the decision or action and provide an explanation of why the decision or action aligns with that party. |Decisions and Actions |Democratic-Republican Party’s Beliefs and Ideals |Federalist Party’s Beliefs and Ideals | |Less formal White House, from parties and |These actions line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist Party believed in keeping an air of elegance about the | |dress, to mode of transportation for the |because they were for less government, and definitely against creating |office of president, as well as maintaining a formal attitude in the White| |president. |another monarchy. Also, this party stood more for the lower classes. |House | |Jefferson repealed many taxes and reduced |These actions also line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist’s were in favor of taxation, knowing that some form of | |the number of federal employees. |and ideals for small, weak government. Repealing taxes put the...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

History

...The debate between federalists and anti-federalists was very intense during the time the constitution was ratified. The reason why I consider myself a member of the Anti-federalist party is due to the fact that I agree with their main purpose, which was States ’ Right. I believe the rights and powers should be held by individual rather than by the Federal government. How would our country be like without these rights in the first place? Chaotic Right?! Federalists believed in a stronger centralized government, was led by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Two quotes from the Federalist papers would be. “We may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior.” And “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.” Also the Federalist Party supported the Virginia plan Anti-Federalists believed in strong states’ rights wanted a weak federal government that would not threaten states’ rights was led by Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee. Although the name does not mean that they were federalism, they were against a strong central government. "It is the opinion of the greatest writers, that a very extensive country cannot be governed on democratical principles, on any other plan, than a confederation of a number of small...

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Government 3.05

...shedding negativity onto Obama’s political campaign. The way that Obama and Oprah are standing together, raising their holding hands, suggests that it is more of their campaign rather than his campaign. I believe the two elderly ladies making the commentary were created to be elderly on purpose because it gives the humor a more innocent and lighthearted view yet at the same time, it reveals the point of the picture. The most noticeable piece of the cartoon is Oprah’s name in huge letters over Obama’s name. This makes it seem as if they really were running a campaign together. Our media has changed over time by going from anonymous published political essays such as The Federalist Papers, to multiple sources of constant coverage such as the Internet and television. During the time of the Federalist Papers, people had to wait weeks to discover what was happening in politics. Today, we almost don’t have to wait any time at all to know just what’s going on not just in politics but, on any publicized topics. This has affected political communication by giving us the resources to find out so much more about our politicians. This can go towards their benefit in many positive ways and many negative ways as...

Words: 272 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Alexander Hamilton Federalism

...Federalism as a Priority As claimed by Hamilton, “The people are turbulent and changing, they seldom judge or determine right.” In these words, Hamilton expressed the simple logic behind the supposedly “evil” idea of Federalism. This quote would prove to be quite important in recent debates which would alter the entire fate of the nation, for good or for bad. On one side were the Republicans, which felt that a nation based on strict Constitutional law and favoring the majority would lead us out of our troubles. On the other, Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists, who felt an elite community of the educated and powerful would best the best for our country. Yet, despite various good points from both sides, the only truly reasonable answer...

Words: 1049 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Anti Federalism Dbq

...“The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.”(Madison, 1787) The Federalists, writing under the pseudonym Publius, advocated a strong central government in the new nation. They argued against the Anti-Federalist writers like Brutus, whose ideas of an effective government resided with stronger state governments. Both views of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists were justified in unifying the newly emancipated American colonies. While there is much debate on who theoretically won the political battle that resulted in the ratification of the constitution in 1789, it is clear that the modern American government no longer represents James Madison ideals of a balanced federal...

Words: 1502 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Alexander Hamilton Accomplishments

...lieutenant colonel. After the war was over, he started to study law. During this time he had put much thought into the flaws of the Articles of Confederation. He wrote detailed descriptions of how he planned to reform America's government and finance. Hamilton had soon come to revise the Articles, and was called to the Federal Convention of 1787. There, he was outvoted by the others, who were opposed to the emerging Constitution (Freeman, 2006). “Men often oppose a thing merely because they have no agency in planning it, or because it may have been planned by those they dislike.” (Hamilton). With the help of James Madison and John Jay, Hamilton planned to write a series of essays defending the new United States Constitution entitled the Federalists Papers. The plan was to write a total of twenty-five essays, but after six months, they wrote eighty-five essays. John Jay wrote five. James Madison wrote twenty-nine, and Hamilton wrote the other fifty-one (“Alexander Hamilton” 1998). “A well adjusted person is one who makes the same mistake twice without getting nervous.” (Hamilton). This quote by Alexander shows that he was a person who was not afraid to make a mistake. Hamilton quoted this as he showed that he had a growth mindset, as well as knowing how to be a leader. Alexander Hamilton helped to create...

Words: 805 - Pages: 4