THE PATH FROM HERE
2013 AnnuAl RepoRt

Contents
8 Chairman’s letter 12 Ceo’s Review 20 Global Market Activity 22 Directors’ Report 31 Corporate Governance Statement 41 Remuneration Report 56 Independent Auditor’s Report 58 Auditor’s Independence Declaration 59 Financial Report 110 ASX Additional Information 112 Corporate Information

Lynas has continued to achieve significant milestones during FY2013. With our vision to become the leader in Rare Earths for a sustainable future in sight, we remain committed to our core values: Safe for people Safe for the environment Secure for cuStomerS

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

1

SAFE FOR PEOPLE

Focussed on the Safety and health of our employeeS, buSineSS partnerS and the community.
At Lynas, we are dedicated to becoming the benchmark for occupational safety and health standards in the global Rare Earths industry by providing and maintaining a safe working environment and preventing injury, illness and impairment to the health of our employees, business partners and the community. Our goal is Zero Harm.

LOst timE injuRY FREquEncY RAtiO chemicals industry peer 1 chemicals industry peer 2 lynas Corporation mining industry peer 1 chemicals industry peer 3 mining industry peer 2 chemicals industry peer 4 mining industry peer 3 0.5 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.7

2

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

3

4

SAFE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

paving the way in world claSS Safety and environmental StandardS.
Real-time independent monitoring of environmental data from the Lynas Advanced materials Plant (LAmP) in malaysia verifies no increase in radiological risk and that all emissions and discharges are below permissible limits. Results are publicly displayed at LAmP, in Kuantan and via malaysia’s Department of Environment and Atomic Energy Licensing Board websites.

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

5

SECURE FOR CUSTOMERS

committed to creating a greener and more SuStainable Supply chain.
Rare earths are essential ingredients enabling the advanced technologies that provide applications delivering a greener and more energy-efficient world. Lynas’ mission is to provide a secure and sustainable rare earths supply chain to its customers operating in or supplying the oil refining, automotive, consumer electronics, lighting and power generation industries around the world.

Fccs mAGnEts AutOcAts

La
Lanthanum

Ce
Cerium

Pr
Praseodymium

Nd Sm
Neodymium Samarium

Eu
Europium

Gd
Gadolinium

Tb
Terbium

Dy
Dysprosium

Ho
Holmium

Er
Erbium

Tm
Thulium

Yb
Ytterbium

Lu
Lutetium

Y
Yttrium

6

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

7

chairman’S letter

dear ShareholderS, As Chairman of Lynas Corporation, and on behalf of my fellow Directors, I am pleased to be able to present our Annual Report for 2013. This has been the most important year in our history in moving Lynas toward achieving its vision of becoming the leading global supplier of rare earths for a sustainable future. The Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in Malaysia is now complete and undergoing ramp up to targeted production capacity. Conditions in the global rare earths markets have been difficult and we have experienced a number of important operational challenges. But despite this, the production of our first products for customers in February 2013 represented an auspicious moment in the Company’s history. Also noteworthy during the year were the commissioning of the Phase 2 expansion of our Mount Weld Concentration Plant in Western Australia and the virtual completion of the construction of the Phase 2 expansion of the LAMP. Pending final approvals, we expect first production from LAMP Phase 2 shortly, although subsequent ramp-up will be determined by market conditions. I look forward in future annual reports to detailing highlights in terms of production, sales and financial metrics. For FY2013, our highlights are measured in terms of concluding our construction phase, embarking on our journey into sustainable production, and the attendant conversations we are having with customers about our products. Initial production and sales volumes are smaller than we would have liked; however, viewed in the context of our 12-year journey to achieve production, I believe they are significant nonetheless. A detailed review of operations for the year is contained in the Directors’ Report, beginning on page 22. Commercial production of rare earths is a much more complex and capital-intensive undertaking than production of many other mineral commodities. In reality, our business is as much about chemicals processing as it is about mining. Supplying our customers with refined rare earth products is only possible after an exhaustive process involving mining, crushing and concentration of ore, followed by cracking, leaching, purification, separation, and final processing to meet specific customer product specifications. Then follows a qualification process by each customer for rare earth material that can as be short as a few weeks or as long as a year – it is only complete when the customer concludes their specifications have been satisfactorily met. I am pleased to report that, at the time of writing, we had received 25 qualifications for products by customers with a similar number pending, and that we have achieved sales for each of the products that LAMP has been designed to produce. For the past few years, our focus has been principally on construction — the construction of a concentration plant at Mount Weld in Western Australia and the construction of a state-of-theart rare earths production facility at Gebeng in Pahang, Malaysia. With these efforts now largely accomplished, we are increasingly focused on operations, on ramping up production, on achieving quality that meets individual customer specifications, and on reducing costs and delivering value to our stakeholders. With our total investment now in excess of $1 billion in Malaysia and $300 million in our Mount Weld operations, we look confidently towards FY2014 as a year during which we will achieve production substance and continue to transform the company to deliver sustainable returns to shareholders.

sHARED VALuE / tHE LYnAs WAY
Lynas is committed to the concept that our activities are directed to benefitting all constituencies with which we engage. We believe that seeking beneficial returns for our shareholders cannot be done without also benefitting our communities, employees, customers and suppliers. In other words, we are engaged in a partnership for sustainable and mutual benefit, and this unwavering commitment to Shared Value guides our decisions at Lynas. First among equals are those who invest in our company and those who support us by purchasing our products, but just as important are our host communities, our employees and contractors, and our business partners. Examples of our community activities can be found in the CEO’s Review following. The fundamental set of behaviours and principles that underpins all of our activities is The Lynas Way. We are committed to ensuring that everything we do reflects The Lynas Way, and this includes a policy of zero tolerance with respect to bribery and other forms of corrupt behaviour. This is captured by the Lynas Anti-Bribery Policy and associated policies (such as the Lynas Code of Conduct and the Lynas Whistleblower Policy), and these policies extend beyond Directors and employees to contractors and suppliers. These policies can be viewed on our website.

8

Production technician Riduan Yusof (L) and Production supervisor Khairul Anuwa (R) overseeing lanthanum oxide product finishing in the tunnel furnace at Lynas Advanced material Plant, Gebeng, malaysia.

BOARD REnEWAL
I would like to take this opportunity to thank my Board colleagues, the Lynas management team, and our employees and contractors for their efforts and commitment during the 2013 financial year. We have now completed building the world’s biggest, most advanced, and environmentally-friendly rare earths plant, and offer our customers an integrated, sustainable source of rare earths. Our vision of being “the global leader in rare earths for a sustainable future” is truly achievable. Following the achievement of first production for customers from the LAMP, the Lynas Board determined it an appropriate time to implement the planned CEO succession. Consequently, from March 31, I became a non-executive Chairman and Eric Noyrez was appointed an Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer. With the subsequent appointment in August 2013 of Jean-Claude Steinmetz as Chief Operating Officer, based in Malaysia, I believe Lynas now has two very qualified and capable senior executives with a collective 70-plus years of rare earths, chemicals and industrial company management expertise. Also in August, David Davidson and Zygmunt Switkowski announced their departure from the Lynas Board. On behalf of my Board colleagues and the entire company, I would again like to thank David and Ziggy for their counsel and their contributions to the Company through its development phase. I previously acknowledged David’s contribution to helping to shape the culture and organisation of Lynas, and I am pleased to announce that the Board has decided to recognise his particular focus on the Zero Harm principles that are a priority for us by establishing a safety award in his name. We previously established a Board succession planning and renewal program recognising that the skills, knowledge and

experience required to effectively direct an organisation will change over time in response to market developments, opportunities and evolution. The program is designed to ensure Board renewal is achieved in an efficient and orderly manner. Executive search firm Egon Zehnder is assisting the Board in identifying suitable candidates, preferably with experience in global industrial or chemical operations.

tHE FutuRE
The Board and management of Lynas intend delivering a significant change agenda during the coming year and expect to do so without diminishing focus on our customers or the growth of our business. Lynas is strongly positioned for the future and your Board is confident in the company’s prospects. I would like to thank customers who have continued to offer support and encouragement as we bring production on-line, our employees and contractors whose wholehearted endeavours are integral to our success, our suppliers and business partners, and the communities in Western Australia and Pahang who have accepted us as their neighbours. Lastly, I would like to thank each of you for your ongoing support.

Nicholas Curtis AM
Chairman

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

9

10

committed to creating Shared value and Supporting local communitieS. the Lynas Way includes creating shared value through economic development, and working with our host communities to address concerns and share the benefits of our operations. Lynas supports the Balok ivory tower Academy and the Hockey Development Program in Pahang state, malaysia, and the Laverton Leonora cross cultural Association in Western Australia.

HRH crown Prince of Pahang talking to students from the Lynas Hockey Development Program during a field trip to the finals of the 9th Asia cup tournament in ipoh. lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

11

ceo’S review

lynaS achieved Significant mileStoneS during the year as it transitioned from a development company to a producer. In September 2012, the Company was issued a Temporary Operating Licence (TOL) from Malaysia’s Atomic Energy Licensing Board for the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) following a detailed and rigorous regulatory review process. Securing the TOL enabled Lynas to commence the transport of rare earths concentrate from Western Australia to Malaysia and to complete all necessary steps to prepare for first feed to kiln. On November 30, 2012, the first Mount Weld rare earths concentrate was fed into the kiln at the LAMP and, following the initial period of filling the plant, our first two rare earths products for customers were produced on February 27 and 28, 2013. By May, the full suite of rare earth products had been produced – cerium, lanthanum, lanthanum/cerium, neodymium/ praseodymium and SEG (samarium, europium, gadolinium). As we ramped up Phase 1 operations, we experienced premature wearing of some equipment in the cracking unit and some clogging of filters in the leaching section which affected our ability to operate sustainably at nameplate production capacity. We began implementing a series of work programs involving equipment changes and materials handling (such as replacing some stainless steel components with special alloys) from June 2013, and we are confident that production rates will improve in the coming year. During the second half of the financial year, we completed a detailed assessment of each of the rare earth market segments in order to refine our development strategy. Lynas expects rare earths demand to grow at above-GDP rates over the medium term, particularly in the key sectors of rare earth permanent magnets, automotive catalysts and fluid cracking catalysts (FCCs) for oil refineries. These three end markets are projected to account for around half of global rare earths product demand by 2015. By the end of the decade, Lynas predicts that demand growth in these sectors could create supply shortages in certain rare earth element markets, most likely in neodymium/praesodymium and, to a lesser extent, lanthanum. Close consultation with customers as well as with major OEM (original equipment manufacturer) end-users was a key component of this analysis, and I am pleased to report we continue to receive strong support and encouragement from those groups with which we have established long-standing relationships. We have now commenced supplying products to these customers and looks forward to continued growth in volumes.

Phase 1 rotary kiln and waste gas treatment plant at Lynas Advanced material Plant, Gebeng, malaysia.

12

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

13

ceo’S review CONTINUED

Notwithstanding the medium-term outlook, the present rare earths market remains subdued with prices continuing to fall through the first half of calendar 2013. In response to this macro environment, we implemented a program to reduce operating costs and expenditure and announced our intention to optimise production at the Phase 1 capacity level until such time as higher rare earth prices can be sustainably achieved. Recognising that the market requires a pricing paradigm that is sustainable for both producers and customers if it is to achieve its full potential over the long term and avoid triggering another supply crisis such as that of 2010 – 2011, we also announced our intention to adhere to a minimum price schedule. We received encouraging support from customers. Prices in some categories have since begun showing signs of recovery (see charts and tables on pages 20-21). We also reviewed and reprioritised our expansion and exploration projects, as well as related ongoing expenditure. While some expenditure was curtailed, much of our efficiency improvement program involves ensuring future spending delivers cost-competitive growth over time to support the specific value proposition expected by our stakeholders.

Our objective is to ensure that our people and our financial resources are directed exclusively towards activities deemed essential to the Company’s mission of becoming the leader in rare earths for a sustainable future. Underlying everything we do at Lynas is an irrevocable commitment to be safe for people, to be safe for the environment, and to be secure for our customers. With rare earths being used in oil refineries, permanent magnet wind turbines, cars, and many high tech and household electronic devices such as smart phones and tablet computers, a founding principle of Lynas is to offer a secure and sustainable supply of rare earths to our customers. Lynas has a very strong customer base; we are committed to providing supply visibility and, where necessary, price visibility, to allow the rare earths market to continue growing to its full potential. By June 30, 2013, several major customers had qualified our rare earth products allowing for commercial shipments to commence. Subsequent to the end of the year, we completed additional product qualifications with more customers, especially in the rapidly-growing rare earth magnet industry. Based on existing customer agreements and negotiations, we expect to sell our annual Phase 1 production of 11,000tpa REO.

14

Construction of the Phase 2 expansion project in Malaysia to 22,000tpa REO (rare earth oxide) production capacity was virtually completed by end of June 2013 with 6.2 million hours worked with zero Lost Time Injury (LTI). This is an excellent achievement, well in keeping with safety being our primary objective, and I congratulate the Lynas personnel and our main contractors specifically involved in achieving this milestone. Pre-commissioning activities reached 90% completion at the end of June 2013; by September 30 commissioning was pending approvals ahead of an expected start-up later in 2013. The construction was completed within budget. The subsequent ramp-up of Phase 2 production will be determined mainly by market conditions. As our operations ramp up and move to steady-state basis, we strongly believe the Lynas rare earths operation in Malaysia has the potential to act as a hub for a cluster of high-technology industries that depend on our materials. The development of a rare earths cluster is consistent with the Malaysian Government’s aspirations to move Malaysia up to a middle-income economy based on a greater contribution from high-skilled, value-add industries. In addition, Lynas is making a significant economic contribution to Malaysia by buying locally-produced products, materials, equipment, and support activities. Our Western Australia Concentration Plant operated as required during the year following the successful commissioning and ramp-up in the prior financial year. The operations in Western Australia are synchronised to the requirements of the LAMP, and sufficient stockpiles of concentrate were produced ahead of the ramp up of LAMP. At the end of June 2013, 15,710 dry tonnes of concentrate containing 5,626 tonnes of REO were bagged ready for export. Ore commissioning of the Phase 2 Concentration Plant circuit commenced on April 15, 2013. The new flotation circuit, concentrate thickener and pressure filter were successfully commissioned with first concentrate produced on April 18, 2013. The plant reached more than 90% of design capacity several days after the start-up, a performance usually only achieved after several months. Again, I congratulate the Lynas staff and contractors responsible.

top: Production technician izzatrafizzi napis (L), Panelman Kamal mustaffa (seated) and supervisor Production mohd Zahari Zakarian in the main control room at Lynas Advanced material Plant, Gebeng, malaysia. Bottom: Office assistant norizah Othman in the main administration building at Lynas Advanced material Plant, Gebeng, malaysia. lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

15

ceo’S review CONTINUED

16

sustAinABiLitY
Safety for our people and for the communities in which we operate is at the front of mind in everything we do. We are committed to Zero Harm and excellence in health and safety. During the year, our Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate was 0.9, which is on par with benchmark chemical companies and compares favourably with mining company peers. Nevertheless, we had six LTIs, and will continue to strive towards our goal of Zero Harm as we move into steady-state operations. We continue to recruit talented and motivated people, to provide training and growth opportunities for existing employees, and to maintain a commitment to diversity and sustainability principles. In August 2012, our Western Australian operations were externally audited by the internationally-renowned Bureau Veritas and subsequently certified to ISO and OHSAS Safety, Environment and Quality Management Standards (ISO9001, ISO14001 and OHSAS18001). Certification was confirmed by two further audits during 2013. We are very proud of this certification achieved for Quality, Occupational Health and Safety and Environment protection. Subsequent to the end of the year, Lynas Malaysia continues to implement the Lynas Integrated Operational Management System Standards (LIOMSS), which incorporates compliance to OHSAS 18001 (Occupational Health and Safety), ISO14001 (Environment) and ISO9001 (Quality). We are targeting Bureau Veritas certification for Lynas Malaysia by the end of 2013. Considering legacy standards in the rare earths industry, and the associated reputation, it was essential for us to differentiate Lynas from the beginning. Our standards are based on the best practices adopted by other mature and reputable chemicals companies. Since the commencement of LAMP operations, we have proven beyond doubt that the LAMP is safe for people and safe for the local community. Environmental monitoring data from the LAMP, undertaken by independent third-party experts and available through the websites of the Malaysian Department of Environment and the Malaysian Atomic Energy Licensing Board, verifies our absolute compliance with radiation, air and water quality standards. All results are well below the permissible limits. Lynas emissions data is also displayed in real-time displays and visible to the public at LAMP and in Kuantan. Lynas remains committed to absolute transparency to the local community, and our results will continue to be assessed by independent parties. Lynas is committed to shared value with its local communities. In Western Australia, the Mount Weld Community Consultative Committee provides a forum for open discussion between the Company and community representatives to determine initiatives for sharing value and building community resilience. Lynas is also an active participant in the Laverton Leonora Cross Cultural Association. Since 2010, Lynas Malaysia has sponsored the Balok Ivory Tower Academy (BITA) program. BITA’s vision is to eradicate poverty through education. Funded jointly with The Abdul Aziz Palace Foundation and utilising staff from the National University of Malaysia, BITA identifies students with good academic performance from families from the villages close to LAMP and provides a specially-developed program of learning modules conducted on weekends. This also includes inter-session mentoring and motivation programs to assist the students graduate to university. During 2012-13, Lynas Malaysia also began a Hockey Development Project. With similar objectives to BITA, the hockey program provides continuous training by experienced coaches accredited by the Malaysia Hockey Confederation to talented hockey students from families close to LAMP. At the end of the program, consistently well-performed students will earn selection to further education at the Pahang Hockey Academy, a sports boarding school. Since the end of the financial year, the Company also initiated an education program in which Lynas Malaysia staff visit schools to talk about rare earths and outline career development opportunities in rare earths and rare earth dependent industries. The program is initially being rolled out in Pahang State.

metallurgical technician meagan cunningham testing samples in the laboratory at mount Weld, Western Australia.

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

17

ceo’S review CONTINUED

REsPOnsiBLE cARE
Aligned with our vision to become the leader in Rare Earths for a sustainable future and our Lynas Way values, Responsible Care ensures our employees’ health and safety is guaranteed and their social rights are secured. Attracting and retaining employees is critical to our success so it is equally important that they remain engaged and are provided opportunities to develop their skills and experience. Our commitment to gender diversity remains strong and I am proud to report that the number of women involved in the senior management of our Company has risen from 20.5% in 2012 to 26.7%. From an environmental perspective, we have implemented robust environmental management systems to promote sustainability, limit our impact on the environment and comply with relevant environmental legislation. Part of our commitment to environmental management is the minimisation of the storage of solid residues from the LAMP. We are actively engaged in the commercialisation of our solid residues in the form of synthetic mineral products that have potential applications ranging from construction materials to fertiliser additives. We have received customer interest for our synthetic mineral products and we are continuing market trials for these products. These results allow the relevant authorities in Malaysia to address the necessary regulatory approvals to commence commercialisation of these products. I look forward to keeping you updated as we progress this work. Initial testing of the synthetic mineral products made from our recycled solid residues has demonstrated that they are non-toxic, will not leach into the ground and are non-radioactive. The Company has applied for approval from the AELB to use the aggregate co-product in a road base trial. We plan to build a road at LAMP that will be tested and monitored by independent experts over a period of 12 months to demonstrate the performance of the material. The Company has also applied to the AELB to approve the release of our synthetic gypsum co-products from its jurisdiction after a three-month radioactivity analysis revealed levels of radioactivity concentration below 1Bq/g. Once approved, these products will be subjected to Department of Environment jurisdiction as scheduled waste material. Market trials and product testing continue across the range of synthetic mineral products, with further work being done with potential customers and relevant regulatory agencies.

mount Weld senior site Administrator Amelia cox assisting in the Laverton Outback Art Gallery, which is run on a co-operative basis by the Laverton Leonora cross cultural Association, of which Lynas is a sponsor. the gallery was established in 2002 to display, promote and sell authentic Aboriginal art on behalf of the people of the Laverton and Western Desert areas. the art and craft on display is made by the local Wongi people from the lands of the north Eastern Goldfields extending into the Western Desert region. the artists receive up to 80% of the price of the artwork.

18

PEOPLE AnD RELAtiOnsHiPs
The key to our success will be how well we build and sustain effective relationships, including the way in which we interact with each other, the way we collaborate and cooperate, and the way we access and use each other’s capabilities and experience. Lynas endeavours to create a climate of trust and respect in an environment where people can grow both personally and professionally. In April 2013, I was privileged to be appointed by the Board to the position of Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer. I would like to acknowledge the vision and perseverance of Nicholas Curtis in recognising the potential of Mount Weld and creating the opportunity for Lynas to become a new source of rare earths, and I would like to thank the Board for entrusting me with the responsibility for delivering that potential. During 2013, we welcomed a number of highly experienced individuals who will help lead and guide the Company in its journey to being the leading rare earths producer: one that is safe for people, safe for the environment and secure for customers. Within the senior executive management, Mr Alan Jury joined as Executive Vice President for Corporate Affairs in April 2013, and Mr Jean-Claude Steinmetz was appointed Chief Operating Officer, based in Malaysia, in August 2013.

I would like to thank everyone in the Lynas team for their significant contributions this year as we progressed from development into production. I believe Lynas is well positioned to benefit from robust rare earths demand growth in our major markets. As we ramp up our operations I believe Lynas has the potential to deliver further shared value for the communities in which we operate and long-term value for our shareholders.

Eric Noyrez
Chief Executive Officer

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

19

global market activity

100

market conditionS were challenging during the year. Demand for new product was subdued reflecting ongoing customer destocking and weaker than expected global economic growth, especially in China and Japan. Production shutdowns by some leading Chinese producers to try to improve market dynamics and foster sustainable production practices failed to halt falling prices as customers deferred purchases. By financial year end, rare earths prices had fallen to levels that were 140 reportedly impacting the ability of major producers to supply 120 product sustainably over the long term.
80

GLOBAL DEmAnD OutLOOK
Magnets
Rare earth permanent magnets are expected to be the major growth market over the medium term. The automotive market is an important demand driver for rare earth magnets. Conventional autos use numerous rare earth magnets in electric motors to reduce weight and improve fuel efficiency. In addition to growth 10 in global vehicle sales, Lynas also expects increased magnet consumption per vehicle to contribute to growth over the long 8 term. The hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) market is also expected 100% to drive strong growth for rare earth magnets. HEVs use more rare AUTOCAT TAKE UP 6 GLOBALLY EXPECTED earth magnets per vehicle compared with conventional autos as 4 they are also used in the vehicle’s drive-train.

Since the year end, rare earths prices, especially those for magnet-making raw materials and heavy rare earths, have 60 increased in response to several important trends. On the supply 40 side, ongoing restructuring and consolidation of the Chinese 20 rare earths industry continues to limit the availability of illegal and environmentally unsustainable supply of rare earths. Authorised 0 Chinese producers are also facing higher costs associated with complying with stricter enforcement of China’s environmental Pr Oxide FOB China Nd led FOB general Pr Oxide China Domestic emission regulations. This has Oxideto a China reluctance to lower Nd Oxide China Domestic SEG Oxide China Domestic offer prices further. On the demand side, evidence of a continued economic recovery in the US, stimulus-driven economic growth in Japan and the first signs of a recovery in the Eurozone have seen a number of major consumers resume rare earths raw materials offtake to support growth in their businesses.
Ju l-1 2 Au g12 Se p12 O ct -1 N 2 ov -1 De 2 c12 Ja n13 Fe b13 M ar -1 3 Ap r-1 3 M ay -1 3 Ju n13 Ju l-1 3 Au g13 Se p13

$US/kg

The use of rare earth magnets in wind turbines is expected to 2 10 be another major growth market over the long term. The latest generation of direct drive wind turbines, in which the use of 0 8 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 rare earth magnets allows the gearbox to be removed from the turbine, have greatly reduced weight 100% maintenanceUP and AUTOCAT TAKE costs.EFFECT OF INCREASED AUTOCAT GLOBAL VEHICLE PRODUCTION 6 GLOBALLY This makes them ideal for large offshore windEXPECTED Lynas farms. expects direct drive turbines could account for at least 15% of 4 global rare earth magnet consumption by the end of the decade. Rare earth magnets continue to be the preferred choice in major consumer and industrial electronic applications due to their 0 high 2011 2012 strength and high performance to size ratio. Key 2020 magnetic 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 50 applications include smart phones, acoustic speakers, hard disk drives, GLOBAL VEHICLE PRODUCTION inverter air conditioners, industrial EFFECT OF INCREASED AUTOCAT TAKE OUT automation and drive units.
40 2

t-1 2 ov -1 De 2 c12 Ja n13 Fe b13 M ar -1 3 Ap r-1 3 M ay -1 3 Ju n13 Ju l-1 3 Au g13 Se p13 N
25 Nd Oxide FOB China 20

Cerium and lanthanum oxide prices ($us/kg)
Pr Oxide China Domestic SEG Oxide China Domestic

B China

ina Domestic

$US/kg

15 10

’000 tonnes REO

CA Overall, Lynas believes demand for rare earths used0in 0permanent 2 20 201 30grow by at least 10% per annum magnets has the potential to over the medium term.

GR:

9%

Forecast Reo demand in magnet industry (’000 tonnes REO)
50 40 10

20

5 0

0

Ju l-1 2 Au g12 Se p12 O ct -1 N 2 ov -1 De 2 c12 Ja n13 Fe b13 M ar -1 3 Ap r-1 3 M ay -1 3 Ju n13 Ju l-1 3 Au g13 Se p13

’000 tonnes REO

La Oxide FOB China La Oxide China Domestic

Ce Oxide FOB China Ce Oxide China Domestic

30 20 10

2010

C 2020

20109% 2011 AGR: OTHER HEV/EV

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

AUTOMATION & DRIVES CONVENTIONAL AUTOS

ELECTRONICS WIND TURBINES

neodymium, praseodymium and SeG oxide prices ($us/kg)
140 120

10 0

t-1 N 2 ov -1 De 2 c12 $US/kg Ja n13 Fe b13 M ar -1 3 Ap r-1 3 M ay -1 3 Ju n13 Ju l-1 3 Au g13 Se p13

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014 8

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

100 80 60

B China

Ce Oxide FOB China

OTHER HEV/EV

AUTOMATION & DRIVES 6 CONVENTIONAL AUTOS
4

ELECTRONICS WIND TURBINES

100% AUTOCAT TAKE UP GLOBALLY EXPECTED

na Domestic

Ce Oxide China Domestic

Source: Industry sources, Lynas est.

40 20 0

Catalysts

Pr Oxide FOB China Nd Oxide China Domestic

Nd Oxide FOB China

Pr Oxide China Domestic

SEG Oxide China Domestic

Source: Metal-Pages

Cerium and lanthanum are highly effective components of catalyst systems. They absorb, store and release oxygen and 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 also stabilise environments in which they operate. The major 2016 2017 2018 2019 applications for rare earth catalysts are in automotive catalytic GLOBAL VEHICLE PRODUCTION EFFECT OF INCREASED AUTOCAT converters (autocats) for cars and utility vehicles, and in fluid cracking catalysts (FCCs) used in oil refineries.

2

20

Ju l-1 2 Au g12 Se p12 O ct -1 N 2 ov -1 De 2 c12 Ja n13 Fe b13 M ar -1 3 Ap r-1 3 M ay -1 3 Ju n13 Ju l-1 3 Au g13 Se p13

Cerium-based autocats are mainly used to reduce pollutant emissions from vehicles. Apart from growth in global vehicle sales, demand for autocats is further supported by increasingly demanding legislation around the world governing vehicle emissions. Lynas believes demand for rare earths in autocats has the potential to continue to grow by around 6% per annum between 2010 and 2020. Once autocat take-up reaches 100% globally, autocat growth is likely to average around 3% per annum, in line with global vehicle sales growth. Lanthanum stabilises the molecular sieve used in the FCC process which increases the life of the catalyst and increases oil refinery yields by around 5-7%. The FCC market is expected to remain resilient with good growth in demand for rare earth-based FCCs, partially offset by declining gasoline consumption per capita, especially in the Western World.

have impacted demand through the introduction of improved glass manufacturing process and recycling of polishing powder slurries. Lynas expects demand for rare earth-based polishing powders to increase in line with global glass demand at around 4-5% per annum over the medium term.

GLOBAL suPPLY OutLOOK
Global supply of rare earths is predominantly sourced from China, although Lynas and the US now offer customers alternative sources of supply. China continues to restructure and consolidate its rare earths industry to industrialise what was once a “cottage” industry. Environmentally sustainable rare earths production involves significant capital and operating expenditure to safely manage waste gases, process water and solid residues. Such investment requires large-scale operations to justify the cost, well beyond the economical scale of many small operators. China has imposed various production control measures and enforces them through periodic inspections and audits of producing workshops. It is expected that the industry will become economically viable only for a few large state-owned enterprises in a rationalisation similar to that previously undertaken by China in base metals, steel and other commodity industries. The speed with which new suppliers can enter the market is likely to be very slow due to rare earth price volatility in recent years and the early-stage nature of potential new developments. New supply, over time, is more likely to come from existing producers expanding their capacity. Lynas, for example, is able to supply an additional 11,000tpa REO from its completed Phase 2 expansion as and when market conditions warrant bringing this supply to market.

nickel metal hydride (niMH) Batteries
The hybrid electric vehicle market using NiMH batteries is expected to grow over the medium term with HEVs accounting for increased number of global vehicle sales per year. Major HEV producers have confirmed their commitment to NiMH batteries for the time being; however, non-rare earth-consuming lithium-ion batteries may take some market share over the longer term. Lynas expects rare earths demand in NiMH batteries to increase by around 3% per annum over the medium term.

polishing
Glass polishing powders are used in a number of different end markets (e.g. LCD screens, HDD, precision optical, ophthalmic, crystals and flat glass). While rare earth-based polishing powders are the most effective, rare earth price increases in prior years

RARE EARtHs PRicinG
Rare earths oxide (Purity 99% min) lanthanum oxide Cerium oxide neodymium oxide praseodymium oxide Samarium oxide Dysprosium oxide europium oxide terbium oxide Sep-12 19.54 20.38 105.31 108.85 64.77 967.69 2020.00 1938.46 FOB CHiNa avEraGE PriCE Dec-12 13.92 15.31 87.46 88.46 34.85 716.15 1853.08 1446.15 Mar-13 11.00 11.85 79.15 85.00 25.00 630.00 1600.00 1300.00 Jun-13 8.42 8.49 65.71 77.64 19.36 561.43 1110.71 954.29 Sep-13 6.50 6.80 82.00 117.00 11.00 550.00 1100.00 950.00 CHiNa DOMESTiC avEraGE PriCE Sep-12 10.82 10.98 68.88 67.13 9.88 596.94 1028.38 874.03 Dec-12 8.18 8.18 60.60 60.79 8.19 452.71 937.74 709.92 Mar-13 7.15 7.20 52.64 58.14 7.71 345.35 838.37 617.81 Jun-13 5.43 5.44 45.30 57.91 5.88 246.74 636.24 481.80 Sep-13 4.56 4.56 57.80 94.44 4.56 366.35 797.82 667.57

Disclaimer: Information concerning rare earths market data has been sourced from independent analysis of end application demand, along with Lynas estimates of quantities of rare earths end use in various key applications. Although Lynas believes that the outcomes expressed in any forward-looking statements in this document are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and contingencies which are subject to change without notice. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include new applications, the development of economic substitutes, and general economic, market or business conditions. While Lynas has made every reasonable effort to ensure the veracity of the information presented, Lynas does not guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the estimates, forecasts and conclusions contained herein. Accordingly, the market data in this document should be used for general guidance only. There can be no guarantee that actual outcomes will not differ materially from forward-looking statements.

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

21

directorS’ report

The Board of Directors (the “Board” or the “Directors”) of Lynas Corporation Limited (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”) submit their report for the year ended June 30, 2013. In order to comply with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, the Directors report as follows:

DiREctORs
The names and details of the Company’s Directors who were in office during or since the end of the financial year are as set out below. All Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.

prior to the company’s restructure to become Evolution Mining. From June 2004 to August 2011 he served as a Director of the Garvan Institute of Medical Research and from August 2004 to October 2009 he was Chairman of the Board of St Vincent’s & Mater Health Sydney Limited. In addition he served as a Director of St Vincent’s Health Australia Ltd and St Vincent’s Healthcare Ltd from June 1, 2004 to October 1, 2010. His career spans more than 30 years in the resources and finance industries. On June 13, 2011, Mr Curtis was awarded an AM (Member of the Order) for his services to the community through executive roles supporting medical research and healthcare organisations and also for his work fostering Australia-China relations.

inFORmAtiOn ABOut tHE DiREctORs nicholas Curtis AM, BA (Hons), FAICD
CHAIRMAN Mr Curtis is Chairman of the Company. He is Chairman of Forge Resources Limited (renamed Rutila Resources Limited on September 26, 2013) and of the private corporate advisory firm, Riverstone Advisory. Mr Curtis serves as a Director of the Asia Society AustralAsia Centre and as Chairman of Faces in the Street Urban Mental Health Research Institute at St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney. Mr Curtis also serves as a Governor of the Mining and Metals Industry Partnership Group at the World Economic Forum, and is Co-Chair of the Global Growth Company community with the World Economic Forum. He was a Non-Executive Director of Conquest Mining Limited from May 12, 2010 to October 18, 2011

William (liam) Forde BSc (Econ), MAICD
DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr Forde joined the Company as a Non-Executive Director in December 2007 and is the Deputy Chairman of the Company. Mr Forde has many years experience in senior finance and managerial positions in both Ireland and Australia. He is currently a Director of Hastings Funds Management Limited and Chairman of Hastings Management Pty Limited. Mr Forde is also a Director of Hastings High Yield Fund. In addition, Mr Forde is a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Mr Forde was Chief Executive Officer of the Baulderstone Hornibrook Group from 2002 to 2005, following 15 years as Chief Financial Officer for the group.

22

Kathleen Conlon BA (Econ)(Dist), MBA, FAICD NON-ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Ms Conlon was appointed as a Non-Executive Director from November 1, 2011. Ms Conlon is currently a Non-Executive Director of CSR Limited, REA Group Limited and The Benevolent Society. She is also President of the NSW division of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, a member of the National Board of the Australian Institute of Company Directors and a member of Chief Executive Women. Prior to her Non-Executive Director career, Ms Conlon spent 20 years in professional consulting where she successfully assisted companies achieve increased shareholder returns through strategic and operational improvements in a diverse range of industries. Ms Conlon is one of the pre-eminent thought leaders in the area of operations and change management, both in Australia and globally. In 2003, Ms Conlon was awarded the Commonwealth Centenary medal for services to business leadership.

Prior to joining Lynas he was a member of the Executive Committee of Rhodia, a global specialty chemicals company and President of Rhodia Silcea, its rare earths, silicas and diphenols division. Before joining Rhodia, Mr Noyrez held Director and Senior Executive roles in several divisions at Shell between 1989 and 2000 after an earlier career with the Peugeot-Citroen Group. He holds a Masters degree in Engineering and Mechanicals from ENSM (Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines) in France.

David Davidson
NON-ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR (resigned with effect from August 20, 2013) As announced by Lynas on August 20, 2013, Mr Davidson resigned as a director of Lynas with effect from August 20, 2013. Mr Davidson joined the Board on March 28, 2002. He resigned from the Board on August 18, 2005 and was re-appointed as a Director on December 8, 2005. Mr Davidson has had a distinguished career with ICI and DuPont. An Australian, he has lived and worked in Europe and North America and held a number of senior executive roles with global responsibilities. He is a former Director of ICI America Inc. Since returning to Australia, Mr Davidson has been providing executive and corporate advice on organisation development and strategy. Mr Davidson currently does not hold any other listed company Directorships.

Jake Klein BCom (Hons), ACA NON-ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mr Klein is a Non-Executive Director of the Company and joined the Board on August 25, 2004. Mr Klein has also been Executive Chairman of Evolution Mining since October 2011, a company formed following the merger of Conquest Mining Limited (of which he was Executive Chairman from May 2010 until the merger) and Catalpa Resources Limited. Prior to that, Mr Klein was President and Chief Executive Officer of Sino Gold Mining Limited, where he managed (with Mr Curtis who was Chairman until November 2005) the development of that company into the largest foreign participant in the Chinese Gold Industry. Sino Gold Mining Limited was listed on the ASx in 2002 with a market capitalisation of $100 million and was purchased by Eldorado Gold Corporation in late 2009 for over $2 billion. Sino Gold Mining Limited was an ASx 100 company, operating two award-winning gold mines and engaging over 2,000 employees and contractors in China. Mr Klein resigned as a Director of Sino Gold Mining Limited in December 2009. Prior to joining Sino Gold Mining Limited in 1995, Mr Klein was employed at Macquarie Bank and PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr Klein is also currently a Non-Executive Director of OceanaGold Corporation (appointed in December 2009). Mr Klein is a past president of the NSW Branch of the Australia China Business Council and previously served on the NSW Asia Business Council.

Zygmunt (Ziggy) Switkowski PhD, FAICD, FTSE NON-ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR (resigned with effect from August 20, 2013)
As announced by Lynas on August 20, 2013, Dr Switkowski resigned as a director of Lynas with effect from August 20, 2013. Dr Switkowski joined the Company as a Non-Executive Director in February 2011. With an Australian and international executive career spanning more than 25 years, Dr Switkowski has established a reputation as one of Australia’s most distinguished business leaders. Dr Switkowski’s career highlights include serving as Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Telstra, Chief Executive Officer of Optus and Chairman, Managing Director of Kodak (Australasia) and Chairman of Opera Australia. Dr Switkowski currently serves as Executive Chairman of NBN Co, a Director of Tabcorp Limited and Oil Search Limited and is Chairman of Suncorp Group. He is also Chancellor of the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University). Dr Switkowski is the former Chairman of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation. He holds an honours degree in science and a PhD in nuclear physics from the University of Melbourne and is a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Company Directors.

eric noyrez
ExECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr Noyrez is an Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and was appointed to the Board on 31 March 2013. Mr Noyrez joined Lynas as Chief Operating Officer in February 2010 and was given additional responsibilities as President in March 2011. Mr Noyrez has extensive senior management and board level experience in major multinational industrial and chemical companies. He also has detailed knowledge of the international rare earths industry.

lYnAS CoRpoRAtIon lIMIteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

23

Directors’ report

Company seCretaries
Andrew Arnold
Mr Arnold was appointed as General Counsel and Company Secretary to the Group on July 23, 2008, following 15 years as a lawyer at Deacons, including six years as a Partner. During that time Mr Arnold also spent two years on secondment at Riddell Williams, Seattle. In his role at Deacons he had been overseeing the legal work of the Group since 2001. Mr Arnold is the responsible person for communication with the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in relation to listing rule matters.

Sally McDonald
Ms McDonald was appointed as In-house Counsel and an additional Company Secretary on January 30, 2012, following six years as a lawyer at Norton Rose and Addleshaw Goddard.

DireCtors’ shareholDings
As at the date of this report, the interests of the Directors who held office during the 2013 financial year in the shares and options of the Group were: orDinary shares options over orDinary shares

N. Curtis (1) W. Forde K. Conlon (2) D. Davidson J. Klein Z. Switkowski (4) E. Noyrez total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(5) (3)

16,045,758 1,028,441 129,515 727,613 2,082,236 727,613 – 20,741,176

25,500,000 3,250,000 – 2,500,000 2,500,000 – 9,812,853 43,562,853

Ceased to be a member of the Executive and assumed role of Non-Executive Chairman from March 31, 2013. Shares held by spouse. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. Appointed as CEO and an Executive Director, and ceased to act as COO and President, with effect from March 31, 2013.

remuneration of key management personnel
Information about the remuneration of key management personnel is set out in the remuneration report of this Directors’ Report. The term ‘key management personnel’ refers to those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director of the Company.

share options granteD to key management personnel
The following table outlines the options and performance rights issued for the benefit of Directors and other key management personnel during the 2013 financial year. options granteD performanCe rights granteD grant Date

granteD options

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro E. Noyrez

1,057,402 – 453,172 – 1,510,574

– 439,806 – 1,312,853 1,752,659

September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012

24

Directors’ report

Corporate information
The Company is limited by shares and is incorporated and domiciled in Australia. The Group’s corporate structure is as follows: lynas Corporation limited ACN 009 066 648 ABN 27 009 066 648 Date of Incorp. 23/5/1983 Registered in WA

1 share

100% Lynas Services Pty Ltd ABN 31 103 936 232 Date of Incorp. 3/3/2003 Registered in Victoria

100% Mt Weld Holdings Pty Ltd ABN 75 073 998 106 Date of Incorp. 15/5/1996 Registered in WA

100% ACN 053 160 302 Pty Ltd ABN 73 053 160 302 Date of Incorp. 29/7/1991 Registered in NSW

100% Lynas Malaysia Sdn Bhd Malaysian Co Number 752289D Date of Incorp. 6/11/2006 Registered in Malaysia

100% Lynas Africa Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 148 189 511 Date of Incorp. 13/1/2011 Registered in Victoria 5 shares

100% Mt Weld Mining Pty Ltd ABN 96 053 160 400 Date of Incorp. 29/7/1991 Registered in NSW

Lynas Africa Limited Malawi Co Number 8409 Date of Incorp. 12/7/2007 Registered in Malawi

nature of operations anD prinCipal aCtivities
The principal activities of the Group are: • integrated extraction and processing of rare earth minerals, primarily in Australia and Malaysia; and • development of Rare Earth deposits.

performanCe review
The Directors together with management monitor the Group’s overall performance, from implementation of the mission statement and strategic plan through to the performance of the Group against operating and financial plans.

review anD results of operations
Financial performance for the year enDeD in a$ million June 30, 2013 2012

Revenue Cost of sales gross profit (loss) Other income General and administration expenses Other expenses profit (loss) from operating activities Financial income Financial expenses net financial income (expenses) profit (loss) before income tax

0.9 (0.9) – 9.8 (125.1) (13.1) (128.4) 4.8 (17.4) (12.6) (141.0)

– – – – (74.1) (16.0) (90.1) 2.8 (10.6) (7.8) (97.9)

The year ended June 30, 2013 was a period of significant milestones for the Group, with the finalisation of commissioning and commencement of production from the Phase 1 operations at the LAMP (January 2013), the production of the Group’s first rare earth oxide (REO) separated and finished products (February 2013) and the completion and commissioning of the Phase 2 expansion of the Mount Weld operations (June 2013). These milestones mark the end of the Group’s development stage and the commencement of its transition into production. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

25

Directors’ report

Commensurate with the above milestones, the Group recognised its maiden revenue from the sales of REO products. Although these sales were limited, just $0.9 million, and were impacted by the early stage nature of the Group’s production profile and on-going customer qualification processes, they represent a clear step forward in the Group achieving its core objective of becoming the leading sustainable supplier of Rare Earth materials to the market. The overall loss from operating activities increased by $38.3 million, or 43%, to $128.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2013, compared to $90.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. Consistent with its state of operational readiness, the Group has recognised increased non-cash depreciation and amortisation resulting from the commissioning of Phase 1 of the LAMP in Malaysia (2013: $16.5 million; 2102: $1.3 million) while also recognising higher employee costs (2013: $38.1 million; 2012 $26.5 million) as a result of staffing the Group’s operations to full Phase 1 production capacity. In addition, the loss for the year ended June 30, 2013 reflects the impact of reduced production at the Group’s Mount Weld operations due to the planned shutdown (aimed at managing the Group’s on hand concentrate stocks) and the tie in of the Phase 2 expansion that resulted in production costs of $16.5 million during the period not being captured and capitalised to inventory. Also, the Group has been impacted by the recognition of charges under non-cancellable take or pay obligations (2013: $20.7 million; 2012: $4.1 million) which have been provided for based on our future short-term (12 months) delivery estimates, non-cash impairment charges on inventory (2013: $9.1 million; 2012: $8.5 million) from the valuation of certain inventory items to their current net realisable value, while also recognising non-cash impairment charges on property plant and equipment (2013: $3.4 million; 2012: $4.8 million) for items identified as surplus or redundant to current operating capacity. The Group was also positively impacted during the year ended June 30, 2013 by the recognition in the profit and loss of $9.8 million of the $15.2 million received from the Australian Taxation Office arising from eligible research and development expenditure undertaken in the year ended June 30, 2012 around the testing, development and commissioning of the Mount Weld processing facilities. Net financial expenses increased by $4.8 million, or 62%, to $12.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2013 compared to $7.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. During the year the Group recognised an increase in interest income of $2.0 million offset by an increase of $7.5 million in interest and financing costs associated with the Sojitz facility and Mt Kellett convertible bonds. The increased interest expense reflected a full year of interest on the Mt Kellett convertible bonds (2012 included a part-year of interest on the facility) and an additional 2.5% margin on the Sojitz facility since September 2012. In addition, the Group had a period-on-period $0.7 million foreign exchange movement (2013: net loss of $1.5 million; 2012: net loss of $2.2 million) primarily attributable to the movement of the US Dollar and Malaysian Ringgit exchange rates against the AUD. On an adjusted EBITDA basis (refer to note 6 to the Financial Report for the basis of this measure) the Group reported a loss of $107.4 million in the year ended June 30, 2013, compared to a loss of $63.3 million in the year ended June 30, 2012.

Cash flow for the year enDeD in a$ million June 30, 2013 2012

Net Operating Cash flow Net Investing Cash flow Net Financing Cash flow net cash flow

(106.2) (114.2) 155.0 (65.4)

(86.9) (349.7) 206.2 (230.4)

Overall the net cash out flow for the period decreased by $165.0 million from a net cash outflow of $230.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2012 to a net cash outflow of $65.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2013.

Operating cash flows
Net operating cash outflows increased by $19.3 million, or 22%, to $106.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2013, compared to $86.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. The increase in the net cash outflow period-on-period is in line with the Group’s operational readiness and ramp-up activities and was principally driven by an increase in employee costs and the build-up of working capital reflecting the procurement of chemicals and associated inventory items for use in the Groups processing operations. These amounts were offset by the receipt from the Australian Taxation Office of $15.2 million in recognition of the eligible research and development activities undertaken in the year ended June 30, 2012 around the testing, development and commissioning of the Mount Weld processing facilities and $0.6 million representing receipts on the sales of the Group’s first REO products.

Investing cash flows
Net investing cash outflows decreased by $235.5 million or 67%, to $114.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2013, compared with $349.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in the net outflow for the year principally reflects the operational readiness of the LAMP in Malaysia where Phase 1 of the Group’s capital programme outflow were predominantly completed in the 2012 and previous financial years ($132.3 million reduction in cash payments when compared to the June 30, 2012 year) combined with a $95.8 million reduction in settlements on the Phase 2 capital expansion programme (when compared to the June 30, 2012 year) due to the timing of the associated progress payments and the Phase 2 expansion project nearing completion.

26

Directors’ report

Financing cash flows
Net financing cash flows have decreased by $51.2 million, or 25%, to a net cash inflow of $155.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2013, compared to a net cash inflow of $206.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2012. The $155.0 million inflow in the current year principally reflects the net proceeds from the Group’s equity raising completed during November and December 2012 ($169.7 million). The prior year financing inflows mainly comprise the net proceeds of $211.2 million from the Mt Kellett convertible bonds issue in February 2012. These amounts were offset by net interest expense and other finance costs in the respective years.

Financial position for the year enDeD in a$ million June 30, 2013 2012

assets Cash and cash equivalents Inventories Property, plant and equipment Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Available for sale financial assets Other assets total assets liabilities Borrowings Other liabilities total liabilities net assets equity Share capital Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) Reserves total equity 994.6 (430.7) 64.8 628.7 823.1 (287.1) 27.5 563.5 (458.0) (101.0) (559.0) 628.7 (403.1) (57.0) (460.1) 563.5 141.4 92.9 880.3 47.7 1.8 23.6 1,187.7 205.4 65.7 706.6 26.3 3.8 15.8 1,023.6

The overall net assets of the Group increased by $65.2 million from $563.5 million as at June 30, 2012 to $628.7 million as at June 30, 2013. Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2013 comprise $125.7 million of unrestricted cash and $15.7 million of restricted cash. Restricted cash is principally available to fund the capital expenditure associated with the Phase 2 expansion of the Concentration Plant at Mount Weld and the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant in Malaysia ($10.3 million), with the residual available to fund future interest payments under the Sojitz facility ($5.4 million). Inventory has increased by $27.2 million, or 41%, to $92.9 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $65.7 million at June 30, 2012. This increase in inventory (net of non-cash impairment charges of $9.1 million made in the year ended June 30, 2013 as previously discussed), reflects the production ramp-up at the LAMP which has seen increases in the Group’s work in progress by $26.3 million, finished goods by $0.5 million and raw materials and consumables by $0.4 million. As at June 30, 2013 the Group continues to hold 15,865 tonnes of processed concentrate and unprocessed ore of 343,533 tonnes at its Mount Weld operations which are expected to be used for production purposes over the next 12 to 24 month periods respectively. Property plant and equipment has increased by $173.7 million, or 25%, to $880.3 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $706.6 million at June 30, 2012. The increase in property plant and equipment during the year is largely driven by additions of $96.2 million in relation to Phases 1 and 2 construction of the LAMP ($67.1 million) and Phase 2 construction of the Mount Weld concentration plant ($29.1 million). During the year the Group also recognised an initial rehabilitation asset of $16.3 million (and corresponding provision) for the costs associated with the decommissioning, restoration and rehabilitation of the LAMP site in Malaysia. These costs arise from the ongoing construction and operation of Phase 1 of the LAMP. The remainder of the movement relates to the uplift in value of the Malaysian Ringgit denominated assets due to foreign exchange movements, offset by depreciation ($18.6 million) and a transfer of consumables from assets under construction to inventory on completion of Phase 1 construction of the LAMP ($9.3 million).

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

27

Directors’ report

Deferred exploration and evaluation costs have increased by $21.4 million, or 81%, to $47.7 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $26.3 million at June 30, 2012. The increase mainly relates to recognition of an increase in the rehabilitation asset (and corresponding provision) of $20.8 million for the future costs to decommission, restore and rehabilitate the Mount Weld mine and concentration plant back to pastoral-use land. These costs arise from the operation of the mining and concentration processing facilities at Mount Weld and take into account the areas of disturbance back to pastoral used land at the balance date and the actions required upon cessation of operations to decommission and remove the processing plant from the location. Borrowings of $458.0 million represent the US$225 million Sojitz loan facility revalued at the June 30, 2013 exchange rate, and the liability component of the convertible bonds issued to funds managed or selected by Mt Kellett Capital Management. Other liabilities have increased by $44.0 million, or 77%, to $101.0 million at June 30, 2013, compared to $57.0 million at June 30, 2012. The increase is driven principally by the aforementioned initial recognition of the rehabilitation costs of the LAMP in Malaysia $16.3 million ,the revision to the rehabilitation costs in relation to the Mount Weld concentration plant of $20.8 million and the change in change in provisions for onerous contacts $13.5 million. The increase in share capital of $171.5 million is primarily attributable to the net proceeds of $169.7 million from the equity raising announced during the period which was completed in November and December 2012. The movement in reserves of $37.3 million during the current period reflects movements in the equity settled employee benefits, foreign currency translation and investment revaluation reserves. As outlined in note 23 to the financial report, on September 13, 2013 the Group amended the Sojitz loan facility to extend the existing Project Sunset Date from January 19, 2014 to March 31, 2015. In connection with this amendment certain terms relating to the principal repayments of the loan facility and the release of security were modified, as outlined in note 23.

Capital structure
At the start of the year the Group had 1,715,029,131 ordinary shares on issue. During the year an additional 245,772,161 shares were issued as follows: number Shares on issue June 30, 2012 Issue of shares pursuant to equity raising Issue of shares pursuant to option conversion shares on issue June 30, 2013

1,715,029,131 244,641,929 1,130,232 1,960,801,292

In addition to the ordinary shares on issue there were 72,485,196 unlisted options and performance rights and 225,000,000 unlisted convertible bonds on issue with a conversion price of A$1.15 (based on a US$:A$ exchange rate of 0.9533).

review of operations
Lynas commenced commercial production and shipments of Rare Earths products during the year. The Company was issued a Temporary Operating Licence (TOL) for its Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in September 2012. First feed of Rare Earths concentrate into the LAMP rotary kilns occurred in November 2012 and first Rare Earths products were produced in February 2013. Since then, the LAMP has been ramping up production towards the Phase 1 nameplate production capacity of 11,000 tonnes per annum Rare Earths Oxide (REO).

Western Australia operations
During the year, the Mount Weld Concentration Plant effectively remained shut down due to sufficient stockpiles of concentrate having been produced ahead of the ramp up of operations at the LAMP. At the end of the year 15,710 dry tonnes of concentrate containing 5,626 tonnes of REO were bagged ready for export. Ore commissioning of the Phase 2 Concentration Plant circuit commenced on April 15, 2013. The new flotation circuit, concentrate thickener and pressure filter were successfully commissioned with first concentrate produced on April 18, 2013. In August 2012, the Western Australian Operations achieved certification to the OHSAS 18001 (Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems), ISO 14001 (Environmental Management Systems) and ISO 9001 (Quality Management Systems) standards. The Operations remain certified to these standards. In September 2012, Lynas announced a significant upgrade of the Ore Reserves at Mount Weld. The new Ore Reserves at the Central Lanthanide Deposit (CLD), using cut-off grades ranging from 4-7% depending on the type of ore, are 9.7 million tonnes at an average grade of 11.7% REO for a total of 1.14 million tonnes of contained REO. The Ore Reserves estimate for the CLD is 362% higher compared with the 2005 estimate and the contained REO in the Ore Reserves is 260% higher than the 2005 estimate.

28

Directors’ report

In June 2012, Lynas announced it had completed a scoping study on the development of the Duncan deposit at Mount Weld. Since that time, further work has been done evaluating potential locations for processing and optimising the metallurgical flowsheet. However, against the backdrop of declining Rare Earths prices and the Group’s strategy to reduce operating costs, management has decided to postpone further development work on the Duncan Deposit until market conditions recover. In February 2013, the Australian Taxation Office made a $15.2 million payment to Lynas for eligible research and development expenditure during the year ended June 30, 2012, principally on the development of the Lynas Mount Weld Rare Earths project. Global rare earths market conditions were relatively challenging during the year. Demand for fresh product was subdued reflecting ongoing customer destocking and weaker than expected global economic growth, especially in China. Rare earths pricing reflected this trend with prices continuing to retrace over the course of the year. Declining prices triggered temporary production shutdowns in 2012 by some of the leading Chinese producers in an effort to improve market dynamics. Despite these measures, prices continued to fall as customers deferred fresh purchases due to prevailing macroeconomic uncertainties affecting the growth outlook for their businesses. By year end, rare earths prices had fallen to levels that were impacting the ability of producers to supply product sustainably over the long term.

Malaysia operations
On September 5, 2012, the Malaysian Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) issued the TOL for the LAMP. The AELB will monitor the plant’s operations and adherence to prescribed safety standards. Compliance with those standards will be the criteria for conversion of the TOL to a permanent operating licence during the next two years. Following receipt of the TOL, the Group commenced transportation of Rare Earths concentrate from Western Australia and achieved first feed of concentrate into the LAMP rotary kilns in November 2012. In February 2013, Lynas produced its first Rare Earths products for customers. In the year ending June 30, 2013, the Company produced 144 tonnes on an REO equivalent basis and shipped 117 tonnes on an REO equivalent basis. Following commencement of commercial production, the Group began engaging with its customers in a series of product qualifications. Several customers qualified the Group’s Rare Earths products during the year allowing for commercial shipments to commence. The Group remained engaged in the qualification process with other customers at year end. In the process of ramping up operations at the LAMP, the Company identified some issues relating to clogging and premature wearing of equipment that affected its ability to operate at around nameplate production capacity in the cracking and leaching units of Phase 1 of the LAMP. Subsequent to the end of the period, the Company began implementing a series of work programs involving equipment changes and materials handling to allow the cracking and leaching units to operate continuously at nameplate production capacity. None of these programs involved significant capital investments. Commercial production of REO products continues at a reduced volume while these programs are ongoing during the second half of calendar 2013. Concurrent with the production of Rare Earths at the LAMP, the Group also commenced production of synthetic gypsum and aggregate co-products on site. Lynas has received customer interest for its synthetic mineral products and is continuing market trials for these products. The Group remained in discussions with the relevant authorities in Malaysia at year end regarding obtaining the necessary regulatory approvals to commence exports of these products. One of the products was tested by a third party laboratory during the year which concluded that it is safe and meets regulatory requirements. For other synthetic mineral products, testing and market trials remained ongoing. Construction of the Phase 2 project in Malaysia was virtually completed by end of June 2013 with 6.2 million hours worked with zero Loss Time Injury (LTI). Pre-commissioning activities reached 90% complete and commissioning has started ahead of an expected start-up in Q3 2013. The subsequent ramp-up of Phase 2 production will be determined by various factors, primarily being market conditions. In total, there have been three legal challenges to the TOL. The first challenge related to the decision of the AELB in February 2012 to approve the TOL. That challenge has been dismissed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court, the Malaysian Court of Appeal and the Malaysian Federal Court. There are no further avenues for this challenge to be appealed. The second challenge relates to the decision of the Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation to dismiss a statutory appeal of the AELB’s decision to approve the TOL. That challenge is expected to be heard by the Kuantan High Court during 2013. The third challenge relates to the decision of the AELB in September 2012 to issue the TOL. That challenge has been dismissed by the Kuantan High Court. Lynas understands that the applicants intend to appeal this decision to the Court of Appeal. The appeal is expected to be heard during 2013. Since the commencement of LAMP operations, the measured emissions on site have consistently been significantly lower than the regulatory limits. Lynas provides real-time monitoring of these emissions at LAMP, and the results are transmitted to Malaysia’s Department of Environment (DoE) and to the AELB. Lynas Malaysia continues to implement the Lynas Integrated Operational Management System Standards (LIOMSS), which incorporates compliance to OHSAS 18001 (Occupational Health and Safety), ISO14001 (Environment) and ISO9001 (Quality). Lynas Malaysia is on track to achieve external certification to these standards in 2013.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

29

Directors’ report

Malawi operations
The company is continuing to work with the Malawi Government with the aim of resolving the issues affecting Lynas’ title to the Kangankunde Rare Earths (“KGK”) resource development in Malawi. Since fiscal year 2012, no further capital investment has been made and the project remains on hold.

earnings per share
June 30, earnings (loss) per share 2013 2012

Basic loss per share (cents per share) Diluted loss per share (cents per share)

(7.71) (7.71)

(5.12) (5.12)

DiviDenDs
No dividend has been recommended since the end of the financial year.

risk management
The Group takes a proactive approach to risk management. The Directors are responsible for ensuring that risks and opportunities are identified on a timely basis and that the Group’s objectives and activities are aligned with these risks and opportunities. The Group believes that it is crucial for Directors to be a part of this process, and as such has established a Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee.

statement of ComplianCe
The financial report is based on the guidelines in The Group 100 Incorporated publication Guide to the Review of Operations and Financial Condition.

signifiCant Changes in the state of affairs
Except as disclosed in the review of operations and subsequent events, there have been no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Group during the current financial year.

environmental regulation anD performanCe
The Group is bound by the requirements and guidelines of the relevant environmental protection authorities for the management and rehabilitation of mining tenements owned or previously owned by the Group. Mining tenements are being maintained and rehabilitated following these guidelines. There have been no known breaches of any of these conditions.

30

corporate Governance statement

The Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for the corporate governance of the Group. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of the Group on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable. In accordance with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s (the “Council’s”) recommendations, the Corporate Governance Statement must contain certain specific information and also report on the Group’s adoption of the Council’s best practice recommendations on an exception basis, whereby disclosure is required of any recommendations that have not been adopted by the Group, together with the reasons why they have not been adopted. The Group’s corporate governance principles and policies are therefore structured with reference to the Council’s best practice recommendations. The Group’s corporate governance practices were in place throughout the financial year ended June 30, 2013, and complied with all of the Council’s Principles and Recommendations except as noted below in relation to Recommendations 2.2 and, up until March 31, 2013, Recommendation 2.3. Details of the Group’s corporate governance practices in place throughout the financial year ended June 30, 2013 are as follows.

prinCiple 1 – lay soliD founDations for management anD oversight
Recommendation 1.1 – Functions reserved to the Board and delegated to Senior Executives
The Group has established the functions reserved to the Board and the functions delegated to senior executives. The functions reserved to the Board include: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) oversight of the Group, including its control and accountability systems; appointing and removing the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) (or equivalent), including approving remuneration of the CEO and the remuneration policy and succession plans for the CEO; ratifying the appointment and, where appropriate, the removal of the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (or equivalent) and the Company Secretary; input into the final approval of management’s development of corporate strategy and performance objectives; reviewing and ratifying systems of risk management and internal compliance and control, codes of conduct and legal compliance; monitoring senior management’s performance and implementation of strategy, and ensuring appropriate resources are available; approving and monitoring the progress of major capital expenditure, capital management and acquisitions and divestitures; approving and monitoring financial and other reporting; appointment and composition of committees of the Board;

(10) on recommendation of the Audit Committee, appointment of external auditors; and (11) on recommendation of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, initiating Board and Director evaluation. The functions delegated to senior executives include: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) implementing the Group’s vision, values and business plan; managing the business to agreed capital and operating expenditure budgets; identifying and exploring opportunities to build and sustain the business; allocating resources to achieve the desired business outcomes; sharing knowledge and experience to enhance success; facilitating and monitoring the potential and career development of the Group’s people resources; identifying and mitigating areas of risk within the business; managing effectively the internal and external stakeholder relationships and engagement strategies; sharing information and making decisions across functional areas;

(10) determining the senior executives’ position on strategic and operational issues; and (11) determining the senior executives’ position on matters that will be referred to the Board.

Recommendation 1.2 – Performance evaluation of Senior Executives
The Group has established detailed written Key Responsibility Areas and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each senior executive. The performance of senior executives is periodically reviewed against their KPIs, at least once every 12 months, as part of the Group’s formal performance review procedures. The Group has adopted a formal procedure whereby each senior executive meets with his/her direct supervisor to review performance against KPI’s during the review period. The results of that review are recorded in writing for follow up during subsequent meetings, and for internal reporting purposes. Induction procedures are in place to allow new senior executives to participate fully and actively in management decision making at the earliest opportunity.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

31

corporate Governance statement

Recommendation 1.3 – Performance evaluation of Senior Executives during the financial year
An evaluation of senior executives took place during the financial year. The evaluation was in accordance with the procedure disclosed in relation to Recommendation 1.2. The matters reserved for the Board are disclosed in relation to Recommendation 1.1. In addition, these matters are summarised in the Group’s Board Charter, a copy of which is available on the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com. The matters delegated to senior executives are disclosed in relation to Recommendation 1.1.

prinCiple 2 – struCture the boarD to aDD value
Recommendation 2.1 – A majority of the Board should be Independent Directors
Recommendation 2.1 requires a majority of the Board to be independent Directors. The Council defines independence as being free from any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with – or could reasonably be perceived to materially interfere with – the exercise of unfettered and independent judgement. During the financial year ended June 30, 2013, the Board had a majority of independent Directors. In accordance with the definition of independence above, and the materiality thresholds set, D. Davidson, J. Klein, W. Forde, Z. Switkowski and K. Conlon were viewed as independent Directors. During the financial year ending June 30, 2012, Mr Forde acted as Chairman of the LampsOn Board, which had oversight of the construction of Phase 1 of the Rare Earths Project, and received consultancy fees for those services. As construction of Phase 1 of the Rare Earths Project has been completed, Mr Forde has not provided any consultancy services to the Group since June 30, 2012. The Board does not view this historical consultancy arrangement as interfering with the exercise of unfettered and independent judgement. N. Curtis is the Non-Executive Chairman. As Mr Curtis was employed as the Chief Executive Officer of the Group up until March 31, 2013, Mr Curtis is not an independent Director of the Group in accordance with the definition above. E. Noyrez is an Executive Director and the Chief Executive Officer of the Group. As the Chief Executive Officer of the Group, Mr Noyrez is not an independent Director of the Group in accordance with the definition above.

Recommendation 2.2 – The Chair should be an independent Director
N. Curtis is the Chairman of the Group. Mr Curtis has a 0.82% shareholding in the Group and the Board does not view this as interfering with the exercise of unfettered and independent judgement. However, as Mr Curtis was employed as the Chief Executive Officer of the Group up until March 31, 2013, Mr Curtis is not an independent Director of the Group in accordance with the Council’s definition of independence. The Board believes that Mr Curtis is the best person to perform the role of Chairman of the Group. The role of Mr Curtis as Chairman is balanced by the presence of a clear majority of independent Directors on the Board. In addition Mr Forde, who is an independent Non-Executive Director, acts as the Deputy Chairman of the Board. The role of the Deputy Chairman includes chairing meetings of the Board on matters where the Chairman is unable to act in that capacity, for example due to a lack of independence.

Recommendation 2.3 – The roles of Chair and Chief Executive officer should be separated
As disclosed in relation to Recommendation 2.2, N. Curtis acted as both Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Group up until March 31, 2013. During that period, the Group was primarily in the development phase and the Board believed that Mr Curtis was the best person to perform both the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at that stage of the Group’s growth. To reflect the Group’s transition from development to producing status, Mr Curtis’ role changed from Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to Non-Executive Chairman with effect from March 31, 2013. E. Noyrez succeeded Mr Curtis as Chief Executive Officer from that date.

Recommendation 2.4 – Nomination Committee
The Board has established a Nomination and Remuneration Committee. A copy of the Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee consists only of independent Non-Executive Directors. During the year, the members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were Ms Conlon and Messrs. Davidson, Forde and Switkowski. Further details are provided in the Directors Meetings section of the Director’s Report.

Recommendation 2.5 – Process for evaluating the performance of the Board
In accordance with the Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Committee is responsible for the: (1) (2) (3) (4) evaluation and review of the performance of the Board against both measurable and qualitative indicators established by the Committee; evaluation and review of the performance of individual Directors against both measurable and qualitative indicators established by the Committee; review of and making of recommendations on the size and structure of the Board; and review of the effectiveness and programme of Board meetings.

32

corporate Governance statement

Recommendation 2.6 – Additional information concerning the Board and Directors
In accordance with Recommendation 2.6, the Group provides the following additional information: (1) (2) The skills and experience of each Director is set out in the Directors section of the Directors’ Report. The period of office of each Director who held office as at June 30, 2013 is as follows: name term in offiCe

N. Curtis J. Klein D. Davidson W. Forde Z. Switkowski K. Conlon E. Noyrez

11 years 8 years 7 years 7 months 5 years 5 months 2 year 5 months 1 year 8 months 3 months*

* E. Noyrez joined Lynas in February 2010 as the President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr Noyrez was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director with effect from March 31, 2013.

(3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

The reasons why Messrs Klein, Davidson, Forde and Switkowski and Ms Conlon were considered to be independent Directors are disclosed in relation to Recommendation 2.1. There are procedures in place, agreed by the Board, to enable Directors, in furtherance of their duties, to seek independent professional advice at the Group’s expense. Details of the names of members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee during the year are disclosed in relation to Recommendation 2.4 and attendances at meetings are set out in the Directors Meetings section of the Directors’ Report. An evaluation of the performance of the Board, its committees and individual Directors took place during the financial year. That evaluation was in accordance with the process disclosed. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is responsible for providing the Board with advice and recommendations regarding the ongoing development of: (a) (b) a plan for identifying, assessing and enhancing Director competencies; and a succession plan that is designed to ensure that an appropriate balance of skills, experience and expertise is maintained on the Board.

The Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee requires that prior to identifying an individual for nomination for Directorship, the Committee must evaluate the range of skills, experience and expertise currently existing on the Board to ensure that the Committee identifies the particular skills, experience and expertise that will most effectively complement the Board’s current composition. If a new candidate is approved by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the appointment of that new candidate is ultimately subject to shareholder approval in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and the Company’s Constitution. (8) The Group is committed to promoting a culture that embraces diversity and recognises that employees at all levels of the Group may have domestic responsibilities. Diversity includes, but is not limited to, gender, age, ethnicity and cultural background. There is a particular focus on gender diversity throughout the various levels of employment and management in the Group. The Group is committed to identifying programmes that assist in the development of a broader pool of skilled and experienced Board candidates including: (a) (b) initiatives focused on skills development, such as executive mentoring programmes; and career advancement programmes to develop skills and experience that prepare employees for senior management and Board positions.

(9)

(10) Pursuant to Article 13.2 of the Company’s Constitution, one-third of the Directors of the Company (other than the Chief Executive Officer), or if their number is not a multiple of three, then such number as is appropriate to ensure that no Director other than alternate Directors and the Chief Executive Officer holds office for more than three years, must retire at each Annual General Meeting and, being eligible, may offer themselves for re-election. If a candidate is approved by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee for re-election, the re-election of that candidate is subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting. (11) The Board’s policy for the nomination and appointment of Directors is summarised above. Further details are set out in the Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. A copy of the Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

33

corporate Governance statement

prinCiple 3 – promote ethiCal anD responsible DeCision making
Recommendation 3.1 – Code of Conduct
The Group has established a code of conduct as to the: (1) (2) (3) practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Group’s integrity; practices necessary to take into account the Group’s legal obligations and the expectations of stakeholders; and responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.

A copy of the code of conduct is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

Conflict Of Interest Policy
The Group has established a ‘conflict of interest’ policy to: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) protect the integrity of the decision-making processes within the Group by avoiding ethical, legal, financial or other conflicts of interest; establish internal procedures so that all employees understand their obligation to avoid actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest; provide guidance to employees for dealing with any conflicts of interest in an open and transparent manner; provide guidance to employees for recognising and reporting on related party transactions; and establish internal procedures to ensure that related party transactions are referred to the Group’s shareholders where required.

A copy of the conflict of interest policy is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

Recommendation 3.2 – Diversity Policy
The Group has established a policy concerning diversity. The Group recognises the need to set diversity measures in each of its operating locations taking into account the differing diversity issues within each geographic location in which it operates. A copy of the ‘Diversity Policy’ is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com. The policy includes requirements for the Board to establish measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and for the Board to assess annually both the objectives and progress in achieving them.

Recommendation 3.3 – Measurable Objectives for Achieving Gender Diversity
Below are the measurable objectives set by the Board for achieving gender diversity together with the progress made in achieving those objectives: (1) Ensuring that recruitment of employees and Directors is made from a diverse pool of qualified candidates. Where appropriate, a professional recruitment firm shall be engaged to select a diverse range of suitably qualified candidates. The Group continues to ensure that professional recruitment firms provide a broad selection of suitably qualified candidates together with prioritising local employment in the areas in which it operates. (2) Ensuring that there are appropriate proportions of women or other groups of individuals within areas of the Group. The Group recognises that further work can be done across all businesses to ensure that there are appropriate proportions of women and other groups of individuals. The Group believes that its current diversity levels are good compared to other companies in its industry. The Group’s policies of favouring local employment and promoting education in its local communities will continue to contribute to the diversity of its workforce. (3) Identifying programmes that assist in the development of a broader pool of skilled and experienced candidates including: (a) (b) initiatives focused on skills development, such as executive mentoring programmes; and career advancement programmes to develop skills and experience that prepare employees for senior management and Board positions.

The Group has in place a formal talent management process including mentoring and succession planning. (4) Taking action against inappropriate workplace behaviour and behaviour that is inconsistent with the diversity objectives of the Group. The Group has in place a Code of Conduct which defines inappropriate behaviour and the potential resultant disciplinary actions. A formal employee grievance process has been established to assist in identifying issues such as inappropriate workplace behaviour and behaviour that is inconsistent with the values and diversity objectives of the Group.

Recommendation 3.4 – Proportion of Women Employees
The Group provides the following statistics on gender diversity as at August 28, 2013 (prior year: July 23, 2012): (1) (2) (3) Proportion of women employees in the whole organisation: 30.5% (2012 – 19.7%) Proportion of women in senior management positions: 26.7% (2012 – 20.5%) Proportion of women on the Board: 20% (2012 – 17.0%)

34

corporate Governance statement

Recommendation 3.5 – Documents on Company Website
Copies of the Code of Conduct and the Diversity Policy are available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com

prinCiple 4 – safeguarD integrity in finanCial reporting
Recommendation 4.1 – Audit Committee
The Group has established an Audit Committee.

Recommendation 4.2 – Structure of the Audit Committee
The Group’s Audit Committee complies with each of the requirements of Recommendation 4.2 as follows: (1) The Audit Committee consists only of Non-Executive Directors. During the financial year, the members of the Audit Committee were Messrs. Forde, Klein and Switkowski and Ms Conlon. Further details are provided in the Directors Meetings section of the Directors’ Report. All of the members of the Audit Committee are independent Directors. The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr Forde, who is an independent Director and who is not Chair of the Board. During the financial year, the Audit Committee had four members.

(2) (3) (4)

Recommendation 4.3 – Audit Committee Charter
The Group has adopted an Audit Committee Charter. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

Recommendation 4.4 – Additional information concerning the Audit Committee
In accordance with Recommendation 4.4, the Group provides the following additional information concerning the Audit Committee: (1) (2) (3) (4) Details of the members of the Audit Committee during the year and their qualifications are as set out above under Recommendation 4.2 – Structure of the Audit Committee and in the Directors section of the Directors’ Report. Four meetings of the Audit Committee were held during the financial year. The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the appointment, remuneration and terms of engagement of the external auditors. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, if an external audit engagement partner plays a significant role in the audit of the Group for five successive financial years, that partner is not eligible to play a significant role in the audit of the Group for a later financial year unless the partner has not played a significant role in the audit of the Group for at least two successive financial years.

prinCiple 5 – make timely anD balanCeD DisClosure
Recommendation 5.1 – ASX Listing Rule Disclosure Requirements
The Group has established a written policy designed to ensure: (1) (2) compliance with ASX Listing Rules disclosure; and accountability at a senior executive level for that disclosure.

Recommendation 5.2 – Continuous Disclosure Policy
A copy of the Group’s Continuous Disclosure Policy is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

prinCiple 6 – respeCt the rights of shareholDers
Recommendation 6.1 – Shareholder Communications Policy
The Group has adopted a Shareholder Communications Policy for: (a) (b) promoting effective communication with shareholders; and encouraging shareholder participation at AGMs.

A copy of the Group’s Shareholder Communications Policy is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

Recommendation 6.2 – Availability of Shareholder Communications Policy
As noted above, a copy of the Group’s Shareholder Communications Policy is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

35

corporate Governance statement

prinCiple 7 – reCognise anD manage risk
Recommendation 7.1 – Risk Management Policies
The Group has established policies for the oversight and management of its material business risks as follows: (1) The Group has adopted a Risk Management Policy and a Risk Management Framework for oversight and management of its material business risks. Those documents clearly describe the roles and accountabilities of the Board, the Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee, the Audit Committee and management. The Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee oversees the Group’s material business risks. The risk management, safety, health, environment and community departments of the Group manage the Group’s material business risks. The Audit Committee oversees financial risks pursuant to the Audit Committee Charter. This includes internal controls to deal with both the effectiveness and efficiency of significant business processes, the safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of proper accounting records, and the reliability of financial information as well as non-financial considerations such as the benchmarking of operational key performance indicators. The finance department of the Group manages financial risks. The Group has adopted the following policies for the oversight and management of material business risks: Risk Management Policy, Environmental Policy, Community Policy and Occupational Health and Safety Policy.

(2) (3) (4)

(5) (6)

Copies of the following documents referred to in this section are available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee Charter; Risk Management Policy; Audit Committee Charter; Environmental Policy; Community Policy; and Occupational Health and Safety Policy.

The categories of risk managed by the Group include operational, environmental, sustainability, compliance, strategic, ethical, reputational, technological, quality, human capital, financial reporting and market-related risks.

Recommendation 7.2 – Risk Management and Internal Control System
The Board has required management to design and implement a Risk Management and Internal Control system to manage the Group’s business risks. The Board has required management to report to it on whether those risks are being managed effectively. Management has reported to the Board as to the effectiveness of the Group’s management of its material business risks.

Recommendation 7.3 – Statement from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
The Board has received assurance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer that the declaration in accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal control, and that the system is operating effectively in all material respects in relation to financial risks.

Recommendation 7.4 – Additional information concerning Risk Management
In accordance with Recommendation 7.4, the Group provides the following additional information concerning Risk Management: (1) (2) (3) The Board has received the report from management under Recommendation 7.2. The Board has received assurance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer under Recommendation 7.3. As noted above in relation to Recommendation 7.1, copies of the Group’s policies on risk oversight and management of material business risks are available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

36

corporate Governance statement

prinCiple 8 – remunerate fairly anD responsibly
Recommendation 8.1 – Remuneration Committee
The Group has established a Nomination and Remuneration Committee.

Recommendation 8.2 – Structure of the Remuneration Committee
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee consists only of independent Non-Executive Directors. The members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee during the financial year were Ms Conlon and Messrs. Davidson, Forde and Switkowski. Further details are provided in the Directors Meetings section of the Directors’ Report. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee was chaired by David Davidson up until June 25, 2013. During that time, Mr Davidson was an independent Director and was not Chair of the Board. Mr Davidson resigned as chair of the Committee, and Ms Conlon was appointed as chair of the Committee, with effect from 25 June 2013.

Recommendation 8.3 – Remuneration of Executive Directors, Executives and Non-Executive Directors
The remuneration of Executive Directors and senior executives during the financial year comprised the following: (1) (2) (3) Fixed remuneration, superannuation payments and termination payments. Share options issued for the benefit of the relevant individuals pursuant to the Group’s employee share option plan. Non-monetary benefits.

Details of the remuneration of Executive Directors and senior executives during the financial year are set out in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors’ Report. The remuneration of Non-Executive Directors during the financial year comprised only of cash fees and superannuation payments. Details of the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors during the financial year are set out in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors’ Report. The fixed remuneration paid to Executive Directors and senior executives is clearly distinguished from the cash fees paid to Non-Executive Directors. The Group complies with Recommendation 8.3 by clearly distinguishing the structure of Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration from that of Executive Directors and senior executives. During the financial year ended June 30, 2013 no options were issued to Non-Executive Directors.

Recommendation 8.4 – Additional information concerning Remuneration
In accordance with Recommendation 8.4, the Group provides the following additional information concerning remuneration: (1) The Nomination and Remuneration Committee consists only of independent Non-Executive Directors. The members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee during the financial year were Ms Conlon and Messrs. Davidson, Forde and Switkowski. Further details are provided in the Directors Meetings section of the Directors’ Report. There were three formal meetings of the Committee during the year. In addition, there were several informal meetings. The Group has no schemes for retirement benefits for Non-Executive Directors, other than superannuation. A copy of the Charter of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee is available from the Group’s website, www. lynascorp.com.

(2) (3)

In accordance with the Group’s share trading policy, Directors and employees must not at any time enter into transactions in associated products which limit the economic risk of participating in unvested entitlements under equity-based remuneration schemes. A copy of the share trading policy is available from the Group’s website, www.lynascorp.com.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

37

Directors’ report

share options anD performanCe rights
As at year end the Group had on issue the following options and performance rights to acquire ordinary fully paid shares:
Date vesteD anD exerCisable exerCise priCe value per option at grant Date

series

grant Date

number

expiry Date

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U

July 21, 2008 September 24, 2008 September 24, 2008 January 5, 2009 July 10, 2009 October 8, 2009 July 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 August 19, 2010* October 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 May 18, 2011 June 6, 2011* November 30, 2011 September 23, 2011 September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* December 12, 2011 September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012* total

1,000,000 14,100,000 2,700,000 100,000 200,000 24,500,000 1,000,000 5,250,000 604,309 1,000,000 6,450,000 200,000 420,000 4,000,000 4,145,000 9,302 4,651 765,000 2,000,000 1,510,574 2,526,360 72,485,196

July 21, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 24, 2011 January 5, 2012 September 24, 2011 October 8, 2012 July 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2011 June 6, 2014 September 22, 2014(1) September 22, 2014 September 22, 2013 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2014 December 12, 2014 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2015

July 21, 2013 September 24, 2013 September 24, 2013 January 5, 2014 September 24, 2013 October 8, 2014 July 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 August 19, 2015 October 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 December 31, 2015 June 6, 2016 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2015 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2016 December 12, 2016 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2017

$ 0.98 $ 0.66 $ 0.81 $ 0.16 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 1.15 $ 0.00 $ 1.60 $ 1.15 $ 2.36 $ 0.00 $ 1.69 $ 1.69 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 1.57 $ 1.02 $ 0.00

$ 0.52 $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.16 $ 0.08 $ 0.23 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.96 $ 0.48 $ 0.66 $ 1.12 $ 2.30 $ 0.40 $ 0.55 $ 1.41 $ 1.41 $1.34 $ 0.51 $ 0.26 $ 0.72

(1) The options issued to N. Curtis were initially approved by the Board on September 23, 2011 and then subsequently approved by the shareholders of the Company at the AGM on November 30, 2011. * Denotes Performance Rights which are issued on the same terms as Options, except there is no consideration payable on exercise.

shares issueD as a result of exerCise of options
During the financial year 1,130,232 options were exercised as set out in note 30 of the ‘notes to the financial statements’.

inDemnifiCation anD insuranCe of DireCtors anD offiCers
During or since the end of the financial year, the Group has paid a premium in respect of a contract insuring all Directors and Officers of the Group against liabilities incurred as a Director or Officer of the Group, to the extent permitted by the Corporations Act 2001, that arise as a result of the following: (a) (b) a wilful breach of duty; or a contravention of sections 182 or 183 of the Corporations Act 2001, as permitted by section 199B of the Corporations Act 2001.

The total amount of insurance contract premiums paid was $163,876. This amount is not included as part of the Directors remuneration in note 30 of the ‘notes to the financial statements’.

non-auDit serviCes
Details of amounts paid or payable to the auditor for non-audit services provided during the year are outlined in note 10 of the ‘notes to the financial statements’. The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services by the auditor during the year is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001.

38

Directors’ report

DireCtors meetings
Committee membership
During the financial year, the Group had an Audit Committee, a Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and a Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee of the Board of Directors. Directors acting on the committees of the Board during the financial year were: auDit nomination anD remuneration risk management, safety, health anD environment

W. Forde (c) K. Conlon J. Klein Z. Switkowski

K. Conlon (c) D. Davidson * W. Forde Z. Switkowski

Z. Switkowski (c) N. Curtis D. Davidson J. Klein

(c) Designates the Chair of the Committee as at June 30, 2013. * Mr Davidson resigned as chair of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee with effect from June 25, 2013. Ms Conlon was appointed as chair with effect from June 25, 2013.

As summarised in the Corporate Governance Statement, the Audit Committee is comprised of independent Directors. The number of Directors’ meetings held during the year and the number of meetings attended by each Director was as follows: meetings of the boarD anD Committees nomination anD remuneration risk management, safety, health anD environment

boarD of DireCtors

auDit

number of meetings held: Number of meetings attended: N. Curtis W. Forde K. Conlon D. Davidson J. Klein Z. Switkowski E. Noyrez
*

9

4

3

4

7 9 9 8 8 9 3*

– 4 4 – 4 4 –

– 3 3 3 – 3 –

2 – – 4 4 4 –

Mr. Noyrez was appointed as a Director with effect from March 31, 2013.

As noted earlier in this report, Messrs Davidson and Switkowski resigned as directors of the Company with effect from August 20, 2013. The Directors acting on the committees of the Board as at the date of this report are as follows: auDit / risk management, safety, health anD environment * nomination anD remuneration

W. Forde (c) K. Conlon J. Klein

K. Conlon (c) N. Curtis W. Forde

(c) Designates the Chair of the Committee. * With effect from August 20, 2013, the Board resolved to merge the Audit Committee and the Risk Management, Safety, Health & Environment Committee into one committee.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

39

Directors’ report

Competent person’s statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Brendan Shand, who is a member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Brendan Shand is an employee of the Group and has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Brendan Shand consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. The Ore Reserves statement in this report has been compiled in accordance with the guidelines defined in The JORC Code. The Ore Reserves have been compiled by Ross Bertinshaw of Golder Associates, who is a fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Chartered Professional (Mining). Mr Bertinshaw has had sufficient experience in Ore Reserve estimation relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify as Competent Person as defined in The JORC Code. Mr Bertinshaw consents to the inclusion in this report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

auDitor’s inDepenDenCe DeClaration
We have obtained an independence declaration from our auditors, Ernst & Young, which follows the Directors’ Declaration.

rounDing of amounts
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class order 98/100, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in relation to the “rounding off” of amounts. Amounts in the Directors’ Report and Financial Report have been rounded off in accordance with the Class Order relief to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the nearest dollar.

40

remuneration report – auDiteD

Dear Shareholder, I am pleased to present our Remuneration Report for 2013. I believe it reflects the Group’s ongoing commitment to ensuring that our remuneration strategy aligns with our business objectives, performance and delivery of shareholder value. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee (the “Committee”) believes that shareholder value is enhanced by the attraction and retention of talented and motivated individuals who are focused on the achievement of our strategic business objectives. The Group is focused on aligning remuneration and Group performance, in the context of a business that is transitioning from development to operations. To facilitate this, the Group’s remuneration philosophy is underpinned by market-competitive remuneration with rewards differentiated based on performance. Our remuneration framework continues to evolve as the business matures. In recent years we have focussed on enhancing alignment to shareholders through refining the performance hurdles associated with the LTI plan. For example, in 2011, we introduced a performance hurdle (net positive operating cash flow) into our LTI plan and then further enhanced the plan by assessing LTI against project milestones and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”). For the current year, we introduced a formal Short Term Incentive (“STI”) plan to further link pay with performance. The introduction of the STI plan reflects the Group’s transition from a development phase to an operational phase, and it recognises that we have important short term goals over the next 12 months based on successful commissioning and ramp-up, production volumes, cash flow, costs, and safety and community programmes and meeting appropriate funds employed, working capital and cash flow targets. The STI component was in substitution for (and not in addition to) portions of remuneration that were previously paid as LTI. In the current year, we also introduced a clawback policy, in line with best practice in corporate governance. The policy entitles the Group to “claw back” certain elements of the remuneration of Key Management Personnel (“KMP”) if the Group becomes aware of any material misstatement in its financial statements for the immediately preceding three financial years due to: (i) non-compliance with any financial reporting requirement (provided that the relevant KMP was a KMP at the time of non-compliance); (ii) the misconduct of the KMP; or (iii) the misconduct of any other Lynas personnel under the supervision of the KMP. Our remuneration report for 2013 reflects key events that occurred during the year, including the following: • Effective March 31, 2013, Nicholas Curtis became Non-Executive Chairman and Eric Noyrez became Chief Executive Office and an Executive Director. One-off termination payments totalling $953,516 were made to Mr Curtis pursuant to the cessation of his employment contract as Executive Chairman. This is reflected in the table in Section F of this report. • The performance hurdle for some Long Term Incentive (“LTI”) awards made in the financial year ended June 30, 2011 was not satisfied. As a consequence, 11,700,000 options and 604,609 performance rights were cancelled. This has resulted in a reversal of current and prior period share based payments expense of $5.5 million of which $4.1 million related to KMP. This is reflected in the table in Section F of this report as a component of the net share based payment expense. Other fundamental elements of our remuneration structure remain unchanged, and include: • Fixed pay targeted at the median level (50th percentile) or better of relevant peer groups, and total remuneration (that is, fixed plus variable pay) targeted at the 75th percentile. In response to the current operating environment, the Group has adopted a policy of no salary increases for the financial year ending June 30, 2014. • The LTI grant for the Executives includes relative TSR and operating milestone performance hurdles. • In 2013, the only remuneration paid to Non-Executive Directors was fees (i.e. no options or similar benefits were issued). We hope that the report will assist your understanding of our remuneration objectives and policies. We welcome your feedback on how we can further improve the remuneration report in the future. Yours sincerely,

kathleen Conlon Chair nomination and remuneration Committee

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

41

remuneration report – auDiteD

This report sets out the remuneration arrangements of Directors and KMP of the Group in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and its regulations.

a.

explanation of key terms
Options and Performance Rights that are issued for the benefit of selected Executives are issued for market value to the Lynas EST. At the same time, the EST makes an advance to the Executive equivalent to the value of the Options and/or Performance Rights to enable the Executive to subscribe for an equivalent number of units in the EST. There is no cash impact for the Group arising from those arrangements. The Executive Chairman (until March 31, 2013), the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director (“CEO”) (from March 31, 2013), the President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) (until March 31, 2013), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the Group’s General Counsel and Company Secretary, the Executive Vice President People and Culture, and the Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs (from April 2, 2013). Those people who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including the Directors (whether executive or otherwise) and the Executives. The LAMP, which is located in the State of Pahang, Malaysia, is the facility for the cracking and separation of concentrate into separated Rare Earths products. LTI is the long term incentive component of Total Remuneration. LTI usually comprises Options or Performance Rights with a three year vesting period that are subject to specified vesting conditions. Further details of the vesting conditions are in Section D. Options and Performance Rights cannot be exercised unless the vesting conditions are satisfied. An Option is a right to purchase a share in the future, subject to the relevant Executive paying an exercise price. Options are issued for the benefit of selected Executives as part of their LTI remuneration. The exercise price is usually set at a premium to the volume weighted average price of the shares on the ASX over the five days prior to the date of offer of the Options. A Performance Right is similar to an Option, except that no “exercise price” is payable when a Performance Right is exercised. STI is the short term incentive component of Total Remuneration. STI usually comprises a cash payment that is only received by the Executive if specified annual goals are achieved. Total Remuneration comprises fixed pay (including superannuation) plus STI and LTI. Total Shareholder Return is the total return from a share to an investor (i.e. capital gain plus dividends).

The following table explains some key terms used in this report: employee share trust (“est”)

executive

key management personnel (“kmp”)

lynas advanced materials plant (“lamp”) long term incentive (“lti”)

option

performance right short term incentive (“sti”) total remuneration total shareholder return (“tsr”)

The KMP during the financial year ended June 30, 2013 were as follows: non-exeCutive DireCtors:

N. Curtis W. Forde K. Conlon D. Davidson J. Klein Z. Switkowski

Chairman (from March 31, 2013, previously Executive Chairman) Deputy Chairman, Non-Executive Director (from March 31, 2013, previously Lead Independent Director), and Chairman of the Audit Committee Non-Executive Director, and Chairman of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee Non-Executive Director (resigned with effect from August 20, 2013) Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director, and Chairman of the Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee (resigned with effect from August 20, 2013)

42

remuneration report – auDiteD

exeCutives:

E. Noyrez L. Catanzaro A. Arnold G. Barr A. Jury

CEO and Executive Director (from March 31, 2013), previously President and COO CFO General Counsel and Company Secretary Executive Vice President People and Culture Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs (from April 2, 2013)

Except as noted, the named person held their current position for the whole of the financial year and since the end of the financial year.

b.

our remuneration philosophy

The Group’s objective is to provide maximum stakeholder benefit through the attraction, retention and motivation of a high quality board of directors and executive management team, by remunerating Directors and Executives fairly and appropriately, consistent with relevant employment market conditions. We align rewards to sustainable value through creating links between the achievement of organisational goals, both long and short term in nature, with the non-fixed elements of individual remuneration. To help the Group achieve this objective, the Committee links the nature and amount of the remuneration paid to the Executives to the Group’s financial and operational performance. The Group also uses external benchmarks to set the total remuneration opportunity for the KMP. Generally speaking, fixed pay will be targeted at the median level (50th percentile) or better of relevant peer groups, and total remuneration will be targeted at the 75th percentile. When comparing total remuneration to market benchmarks and reference group data as a basis on which to determine total remuneration, the Group considers total remuneration in three elements: fixed pay, STI and LTI. The peer group used to benchmark remuneration consisted of 12 companies (Australian and international) with similarities to the Group in respect of their operating model, size (based on the Group’s projected size following the completion and commissioning of the Phase 2 expansion of the Rare Earths Project), market capitalisation, target revenue, and industry sector. They were selected based on the criteria of comparable market capitalisation and projected revenue. The peer group is designed to provide a consistent view of the market for Executive talent over the next few years.

External advisors and remuneration advice
The Committee engages external advisors to provide advice and market related information as required. • During the year, the Committee received remuneration recommendations (as defined in the Corporations Act 2001) from Mercer in relation to the Non-Executive Director remuneration for the Chairman and Deputy Chairman. The following arrangements were made to ensure that the remuneration recommendations were free from undue influence: – The terms of Mercer’s engagement were finalised by the Chair of the Committee and all remuneration recommendations were provided directly to the Committee Chair. – The report containing the remuneration recommendations was provided by Mercer directly to the Chair of the Committee. – Neither the Chairman nor the Deputy Chairman were involved in the selection and appointment of Mercer or in the development of any advice in relation to their roles. As a consequence, the Board is satisfied that the remuneration recommendations received were made free from ‘undue influence’ by the members of the Key Management Personnel to whom the recommendations related. • During the year, the Committee also received advice (but no remuneration recommendations) from Mercer in setting the appropriate levels of total remuneration for Executives. • Total fees paid during the year to Mercer totalled $23,463 (2012: $53,191). Of that amount, $17,325 was for the remuneration recommendation referred to above in respect of the Chairman and Deputy Chairman. This work was completed by June 30, 2013. • From June 2011, PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) was appointed by the Committee as its lead external adviser. During the year, PwC did not provide any remuneration recommendations to the Committee.

C.

role of the nomination anD remuneration Committee

The Board is responsible for determining and reviewing remuneration arrangements for Directors and Executives. The Committee assesses, on a regular basis, the appropriateness of the nature and amount of KMP remuneration. In fulfilling these duties and to support effective governance processes, the Committee: • consists only of independent Non-Executive Directors; • has unrestricted access to management and any relevant documents; and • engages external advisers for assistance to the extent appropriate and necessary (e.g. detailing market levels of remuneration).

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

43

remuneration report – auDiteD

D. our exeCutive remuneration framework
Objective
The Group aims to remunerate its Executives at a level commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the Group so as to: • reward them for the Group, business unit and individual performance against agreed targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks; • align their interests with those of our shareholders; • link their reward with the Group’s strategic goals and performance; and • provide total remuneration that is competitive by market standards.

Structure
Executive remuneration consists of the following key elements: • fixed pay (base salary and superannuation); and • variable remuneration, being: – STI; and – LTI. The Group provides no retirement benefits, other than statutory superannuation or defined benefit pension payments.

Fixed pay
Fixed pay consists of base salary and superannuation. It is determined on an individual basis, taking into account external market benchmarks and individual factors such as capability, experience, responsibility and accountability. Fixed pay is targeted at approximately the median level (50th percentile) or better of the relevant peer group.

Variable remuneration
Notwithstanding the introduction of a formal STI Plan, the Board retains ultimate discretion in relation to the payment of bonuses, Options and other incentive payments, based on the overall performance of the Group and of the individual during the year. In summary: fixed pay = base + super variable remuneration = STI + LTI

STIs
Prior to June 30, 2012 the Board had a discretionary STI policy used to reward exceptional performance. However, with effect from July 1, 2012, the Board decided that a move towards a formalised STI policy was appropriate. The introduction of a formal STI plan resulted in an adjustment of remuneration mix of fixed pay and variable remuneration, rather than an increase in Total Remuneration received by Executives. The STI target opportunities for the KMP are contained in the table below. sti target (expresseD as % of base salary)

stratum

role example

5 6

Members of the Lynas Leadership Team (excluding CEO) CEO & Executive Director

30 % 35 %

The goals and measures of the STI programme (including individual, team and company performance goals and measures), the relative weightings of those measures and goals, and STI target amounts are determined and approved at the commencement of each review period by the Remuneration Committee. During the financial year ended June 30, 2013, the measures were drafted with reference to the following goals: • Corporate: Profitability, Liquidity, Return on Capital, Safety • team: Responsible Care, Customer Satisfaction, Asset Optimisation, Growth Management • individual: Performance Rating The payment of any award under the STI programme is subject to the Group achieving 90% of budgeted performance for free operating cash flows.

LTIs
Options and Performance Rights are provided to KMP and other selected employees to provide greater alignment to our strategic business objectives. They have three year vesting periods, and are exercisable between three and five years after they were granted provided the award recipient is still employed with the Group (unless this requirement, in limited circumstances, is waived by the Board), and any relevant performance conditions are achieved.

44

remuneration report – auDiteD

A summary of the performance conditions attached to Options and Performance Rights issued during the financial year ended June 30, 2013 (in addition to the requirement that the award recipient is still employed by the Group at the end of a three year vesting period) is set out below: (i) (ii) 50% will be conditional on the LAMP having demonstrated the capacity to produce at a rate equivalent to 22,000 tonnes per annum rare earth oxides (REO) before the end of calendar year 2013; and 50% will be conditional on the company’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) being at least at the 51st percentile of ASX 100 companies calculated over the 3-year vesting period, in accordance with the following sliding scale: (a) (b) (c) If the Lynas TSR is at least at the 51st percentile, 50% of the TSR portion will vest. If the Lynas TSR is at least at the 76th percentile, 100% of the TSR portion will vest. If the Lynas TSR is between the 51st percentile and the 76th percentile, a pro rata amount of between 50% and 100% of the TSR portion will vest (with the relevant percentile being rounded up or down to the nearest 5%, for ease of calculation).

In accordance with the Group’s policy governing the trading of the Company’s shares by Directors and employees, award recipients are not permitted to hedge their Options or Performance Rights before they vest. Clawback Policy In circumstances where the Group becomes aware of any material misstatement in its financial statements due to: (i) non-compliance with a financial reporting requirement; (ii) the KMP’s misconduct; or (iii) the misconduct of any other Lynas personnel under the supervision of the relevant KMP, the Board has authority under the clawback policy to: (a) (b) (c) require a KMP to repay some or all of any STI award or LTI award granted to the KMP from July 1, 2013 (“Relevant Award”), to the extent such award has vested; forfeit the reference units representing all or a part of the KMP’s Relevant Award, to the extent such award remains unvested; or withhold the payment or allocation of all or a part of the KMP’s Relevant Award, to the extent such award has not been paid or given to that KMP.

e.

serviCe agreements

The CEO and Executive Director has signed an executive services agreement containing reasonable commercial conditions. Subject to the following provisions, the agreement is for an indefinite duration. The key provisions of the agreement are: notice by Ceo: notice by group: treatment of incentives on termination: Mr Noyrez must give three months written notice of an intention to resign. The effective date of any such notice cannot fall prior to 31 March 2014. The Group may terminate the agreement by giving six months’ written notice. The effective date of any such notice cannot fall prior to 31 March 2014. On resignation, any unvested Options may be forfeited subject to the discretion of the Board. Upon termination of Mr Noyrez’ employment by the Group other than as a result of misconduct, Mr Noyrez will be entitled to retain a pro – rata portion of any unvested Options and Performance Rights held by him on the date of termination. For example, where 50% of the vesting period has been served, Mr Noyrez will be entitled to retain 50% of the unvested Options or Performance Rights. Mr Noyrez will also be entitled to retain any Options or Performance Rights that have vested prior to the date of termination. Upon the Group terminating Mr Noyrez’ employment, the Group will pay a benefit for past services equal to the lower of: (a) the amount permitted under Part 2D.2 of the Corporations Act 2001; (b) the sum of: (i) the balance of Mr Noyrez’ salary over the greater of one year, plus (ii) the STI applicable to the year in which the date of termination occurs, calculated at target. In accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and the formula specified above, the maximum termination payment payable to Mr Noyrez is equal to his base salary for one year (i.e. excluding any LTI component). Upon the Group terminating Mr Noyrez’ employment, provided that Mr Noyrez remains an employee of good standing up until termination, Mr Noyrez will be eligible to be relocated back to his nominated home country in accordance with Lynas’ relocation policy. The Group may terminate Mr Noyrez’ employment at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.

termination benefits:

Employment conditions for all other KMPs are on the following terms: • each may give three month’s written notice of their intention to resign; • the Group may terminate the employment by providing six month’s written notice; lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

45

remuneration report – auDiteD

• on resignation or termination, unvested incentives will be treated in the same manner set out above in respect of Mr Noyrez; and • the Group may terminate employment at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.

f.

linking remuneration anD group performanCe

Prior to the financial year ended June 30, 2011, KMP remuneration (including any component that consisted of securities in the Group) was not formally linked to Group performance. The reason behind this approach was that as the Group was in a development phase it was not appropriate to link remuneration to factors such as profitability or share price. This approach has changed now that the Group is transitioning into its operational phase. • In the financial year ended June 30, 2011, 50% of the LTI grant was subject to the achievement of a net positive operating cash flow hurdle for the six months ending December 31, 2012. That hurdle was not satisfied. • In the financial year ended June 30, 2012, LTI grants were subject to TSR and project milestone hurdles related to REO capacity. The reference period for these hurdles has not yet expired. • In the financial year ended June 30, 2013, LTI grants were also subject to TSR and project milestone hurdles related to REO capacity, as detailed in Section D above. The reference period for these hurdles has not yet expired. Individual performance reviews link total remuneration to individual and business unit performance. From July 1, 2012 the mix of fixed pay and variable remuneration has been adjusted by the introduction of a formal STI plan. The introduction of the STI plan reflects the transition of the Group from a development phase to an operational phase, and it recognises that we have important short term goals over the next 12 months based on successful commissioning and ramp-up, production volumes, cash flow, costs and safety and community programmes. The STI component is intended to be in substitution for (and not in addition to) portions of remuneration that were previously paid predominantly as LTI. During the financial year ended June 30, 2013, the STI plan consisted of two separate review periods, with the first period being from July to December 2012 (“first half review period”), and the second period from January to June 2013 (“second half review period”). As noted above in section D, the payment of any award under the STI programme is subject to the Group achieving 90% of budgeted performance for free operating cash flow (“sti gateway”). The STI Gateway was satisfied with respect to the First Half Review Period, and any awards that are payable under the STI programme with respect to that period will be paid in the year ended June 30, 2014. The STI Gateway was not satisfied with respect to the Second Half Review Period. For further context we provide a comparison of KMP remuneration over the last five years against the Company’s average and closing share price over the same period. The increase in cash remuneration paid from one year to the next reflects the fact that additional Directors and Executives joined the Group to facilitate the transition from a development entity to an operating entity. It also reflects the restructure of the Executive Chairman role into two roles: (i) Non-Executive Chairman; and (ii) CEO, as discussed in the Chair’s letter to shareholders on page 19. In the case of Executives, the increase in cash received during the financial year ended June 30, 2013 in comparison to the previous financial year reflects an adjustment to the remuneration mix in connection with the introduction of a formal STI plan (as described in Section D above).Separately, changes in the share based remuneration from one year to the next reflect the impact of amortising the accounting value of Options and Performance Rights over their three year vesting period and the impact of forfeitures which can relate to both the current and prior periods in a given fiscal period. In certain periods, a negative value may be presented which results when the forfeitures recognised in a period are greater than the accounting amortisation expense for the current portion of the vesting period.

46

remuneration report – auDiteD

finanCial year enDeD

June 30, 2009 June 30, 2010 June 30, 2011 June 30, 2012 June 30, 2013

Number of KMPs Executive Director Non-Executive Directors Other KMP Cash Remuneration Paid ($) Executive Director Non-Executive Directors Other KMP total Cash remuneration paid Share-based remuneration net ($) Executive Director Non-Executive Directors Other KMP total share-based remuneration net total other remuneration (8) ($) total remuneration ($) Annual average share price Closing share price at financial year end earnings per share (eps) Diluted eps loss before tax (‘000) loss after tax (‘000)
(5) (4)

1 3 3 626,053 254,587 1,501,753 2,382,393 1,789,338 306,001 2,076,313 4,171,652 156,941 6,710,986 $0.52 $0.47 ($4.50) ($4.50) ($29,282) ($29,282)

1 3 4 890,000 225,509 2,146,212 3,261,721 2,472,449 510,933 2,146,587 5,129,969 308,632 8,700,322 $0.55 $0.55 ($3.23) ($3.23) ($43,041) ($43,041)

1 4 6 585,920 461,832 2,331,786 3,379,538 3,218,720 1,337,722 3,093,634 7,650,076 767,923 11,797,537 $1.66 $1.98 ($3.54) ($3.54) ($57,288) ($59,086)

1 5 4 657,932 680,223 2,279,343 3,617,498 3,354,243 1,209,861 2,839,426 7,403,530 743,142 11,764,170 $1.30 $0.85 ($5.12) ($5.12) ($97,879) ($87,770)

1 6 4 896,298(1) 2,399,338(2) 2,062,285(3) 5,357,921 562,628(6) (377,239)(7) 861,969(3) 1,047,358 693,943 7,099,222 $0.65 $0.38 ($7.71) ($7.71) ($141,014) ($143,555)

(1) Cash Remuneration paid to the CEO in his previous role as COO (until March 31, 2013) and as CEO (from March 31, 2013). (2) Includes the cash remuneration paid to the Chairman as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman (until March 31, 2013) and as Non-Executive Chairman (from March 31, 2013). (3) Other KMP encompasses the Executives (excluding both the Executive Chairman and the COO for the period up to March 31, 2013, and excluding the CEO from March 31, 2013). (4) Total cash remuneration encompasses cash salary and fees and other short term employee benefits. (5) Represents the cumulative impact of amortising the accounting value of Options and Performance Rights over their three year vesting period including the impact of forfeitures recognised during the period. (6) Share-based remuneration (as determined in accordance with note 5 above) to the CEO in his previous role as COO and President (until March 31, 2013) and as CEO and Executive Director (from March 31, 2013). (7) Includes the share-based remuneration (as determined in accordance with note 5 above) to the Chairman as Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman (until March 31, 2013) and as Non-Executive Chairman (from March 31, 2013). (8) Other remuneration encompasses non-monetary benefits, superannuation and other pension payments.

g. non-exeCutive DireCtor remuneration
Objective
Remuneration of Non-Executive Directors (“NEDs”) is set at a level that enables the Group to attract and retain talented and motivated people at a cost which is acceptable to shareholders. In setting remuneration, the Group takes into account, among other factors: • fees paid to NEDs of companies of a similar size/industry; • the time commitment required for NEDs to properly fulfil their duties; • the risks and responsibilities associated with the roles; and • the relevant commercial and industry experience required.

Structure
The Company’s Constitution and the ASX Listing Rules specify that the maximum aggregate remuneration of NEDs must be determined from time to time by a general meeting. The last determination was at the AGM held on November 20, 2012, and an aggregate pool of $1,250,000 was approved. The aggregate fees for NEDs for the period did not exceed this amount.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

47

remuneration report – auDiteD

Components of Non-Executive Director Remuneration
Each NED receives a fee for being a Director of the Company, and a fee for each committee of which they are members. The NED fees, including committee fees, include statutory superannuation contributions where appropriate.

Base Fees
Base fees for NEDs for the financial year ended June 30, 2013 were: • Chairman $350,000 per annum • Deputy Chairman $125,000 per annum; and • Non-Executive Director $100,000 per annum. As Mr Curtis was employed by the Group as Executive Chairman until March 31, 2013, he received only a pro-rata proportion of the Non-Executive Chairman fee.

Committee Fees boarD Committee Chair $ member $

Audit Committee Risk Management, Safety, Health and Environment Committee Nomination and Remuneration Committee

30,000 25,000 25,000

15,000 12,500 12,500

The remuneration for NEDs for the financial years ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 is set out in Section H of this report.

48

remuneration report – auDiteD

h. Details of remuneration year enDeD June 30, 2013 short-term benefits other shortCash term salary employee anD fees benefits post employment benefits superannuation termi- anD other nation pension payments payments total short term anD post-emp benefits long-term benefits sharebaseD payments (net)(1) performanCe relateD % of total

name

nonmonetary benefits

total

executive Director E. Noyrez(2) non-executive Directors N. Curtis(4) K Conlon D. Davidson W. Forde J. Klein Z. Switkowski(7) executives A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro A. Jury total
(10) (6)

896,298

–

380,353

–

74,826(3)

1,351,477

562,628

29%

1,914,105

837,500 127,500 71,209 153,670 127,500 128,443 481,516 419,728 665,160 95,881

– – – – – – – – 300,000(9) 100,000(11)

14,155 – 44,292 – – – 17,628 13,419 16,832 3,090 489,769

953,516(5) – – – – – – – – – 953,516

– – 25,000 13,830 – 11,560 25,000 25,000 24,840 4,118

1,805,171 127,500 140,501 167,500 127,500 140,003 524,144 458,147(8) 1,006,832 203,089

(78,620) – (92,047) (114,525) (92,047) – 218,035 274,395 369,539 – 1,047,358

(5%) 0% (190%) (216%) (260%) 0% 29% 37% 27% 0%

1,726,551 127,500 48,454 52,975 35,453 140,003 742,179 732,542 1,376,371 203,089 7,099,222

4,004,405 400,000

204,174 6,051,864

(1) Represents the cumulative impact of amortising the accounting value of Options and Performance Rights over their three year vesting period including the impact of forfeitures recognised during the period. At times a negative value may be presented which results when the forfeitures recognised in the period (which may relate also to earlier periods) are greater than the accounting expense for the current portion of the vesting period. (2) Appointed as CEO, and ceased to act as COO, with effect from March 31, 2013. (3) French Citizen Pension Payment. (4) Ceased to be a member of the Executive and assumed role of Non-Executive Chairman with effect from March 31, 2013. (5) This amount represents payments made to Mr Curtis pursuant to the cessation of his employment as Executive Chairman, including a termination payment in accordance with his Service Agreement, and accrued entitlements for annual leave and long service leave. (6) Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. (7) Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. (8) The increase in cash paid to Mr Barr in the financial year ended June 30, 2103 is consistent with the Group’s benchmarking analysis and remuneration policy set out in section B of this report. Mr Barr was appointed as Executive Vice President of People & Culture in April 2011. However, Mr Barr’s remuneration was not adjusted to reflect this change in role until the financial year ended June 30, 2013. (9) Represents one-off amounts fixed under the terms of Ms Catanzaro’s employment contract. (10) Appointed as Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs with effect from April 2, 2013. (11) Represents one-off amounts fixed under the terms of Mr Jury’s employment contract.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

49

remuneration report – auDiteD

year enDeD June 30, 2012 short-term benefits other shortterm employee benefits post employment benefits superannuation termi- anD other nation pension payments payments total short term anD post-emp benefits long-term benefits sharebaseD payments (net)(1) performanCe relateD % of total

name

Cash salary anD fees

nonmonetary benefits

total

executive Director N. Curtis non-executive Directors K Conlon(2) D. Davidson W. Forde J. Klein Z. Switkowski executives A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro(4) E. Noyrez J. G. Taylor(7) M. James(8) total 385,548 266,644 318,509 564,463 125,394 55,932 3,054,645 – – – 450,000(5) – – 450,000 15,703 15,104 7,932 348,125 18,557 4,516 479,449 – – – – – 112,853 112,853 27,670 25,000 24,387 80,705(6) 20,738 5,437 263,693 428,921 306,748 350,828 1,443,293 164,689 178,738 526,916 247,159 187,187 1,018,401 177,323 682,440 55% 45% 35% 41% 52% 79% 955,837 553,907 538,015 2,461,694 342,012 861,178 11,764,170 657,932 – 17,622 – 4,366 679,920 3,354,243 83% 4,034,163

85,000 35,610 303,670(3) 127,500 128,443

– – – – –

– 51.890 – – –

– – – – –

– 50,000 13,830 – 11,560

85,000 137,500 317,500 127,500 140,003

– 370,858 468,145 370,858 –

0% 73% 60% 74% 0%

85,000 508,358 785,645 498,358 140,003

4,360,640 7,403,530

(1) Represents the cumulative impact of amortising the accounting value of Options and Performance Rights over their three year vesting period including the impact of forfeitures recognised during the period. At times a negative value may be presented which results when the forfeitures recognised in the period (which may relate also to earlier periods) are greater than the accounting expense for the current portion of the vesting period. (2) Appointed Director from November 1, 2011. (3) Amount includes Non-Director related fees paid for consulting services provided by W. Forde (as Chair of the LampsOn board) totalling $150,000. As Phase 1 of the Rare Earths Project has been completed, Mr Forde has not provided any consultancy services to the Group since 30 June 2012. (4) Appointed CFO from December 12, 2011. (5) $150,000 of the other short term benefits payment relates to the year ended June 30, 2011 but was paid during the year ended June 30, 2012. $300,000 of the other short term benefits payment relates to the year ended June 30, 2012. (6) French Citizen Pension Payment. (7) Ceased as a member of the KMP on December 12, 2011. (8) Resigned August 31, 2011.

50

remuneration report – auDiteD

i.

share-baseD remuneration value per option at grant Date

The following table lists any Options and Performance Rights which are still to vest, or have yet to expire.

grant Date

number

Date vesteD anD exerCisable

expiry Date

exerCise priCe

July 21, 2008 September 24, 2008 September 24, 2008 January 5, 2009 July 10, 2009 October 8, 2009 July 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 August 19, 2010* October 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 May 18, 2011 June 6, 2011* November 30, 2011 September 23, 2011 September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* December 12, 2011 September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012* total

1,000,000 14,100,000 2,700,000 100,000 200,000 24,500,000 1,000,000 5,250,000 604,309 1,000,000 6,450,000 200,000 420,000 4,000,000 4,145,000 9,302 4,651 765,000 2,000,000 1,510,574 2,526,360 72,485,196

July 21, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 24, 2011 January 5, 2012 September 24, 2011 October 8, 2012 July 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2011 June 6, 2014 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2013 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2014 December 12, 2014 September 24, 2015 (1) September 24, 2015 *(2)

July 21, 2013 September 24, 2013 September 24, 2013 January 5, 2014 September 24, 2013 October 8, 2014 July 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 August 19, 2015 October 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 December 31, 2015 June 6, 2016 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2015 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2016 December 12, 2016 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2017

$ 0.98 $ 0.66 $ 0.81 $ 0.16 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 1.15 $ 0.00 $ 1.60 $ 1.15 $ 2.36 $ 0.00 $ 1.69 $ 1.69 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 1.57 $ 1.02 $ 0.00

$ 0.52 $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.16 $ 0.08 $ 0.23 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.96 $ 0.48 $ 0.66 $ 1.12 $ 2.30 $ 0.40 $ 0.55 $ 1.41 $ 1.41 $ 1.34 $ 0.51 $ 0.26 $ 0.72

* Denotes Performance Rights which are issued on the same terms as Options, except there is no consideration payable on exercise. (1) Options Series T (2) Performance Rights Series U

Fair value of Options
The fair value of each Option and Performance Right is estimated on the date the Options are granted using a Black Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were considered in the valuation of Options and Performance Rights issued during the year ended June 30, 2013: series t series u

Grant date share price ($) Exercise price ($) Dividend yield Expected volatility Risk-free interest rate Life of Option

$0.795 $1.02 Nil 50% 2.63% 5 years

$0.795 $0.00 Nil 50% 2.58% 5 years

No dividends have been paid in the past and so it is not appropriate to estimate future possible dividends in arriving at the fair values. The life of the Options is based on a five-year expiry from date of issue and is therefore not necessarily indicative of exercise patterns that may occur.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

51

remuneration report – auDiteD

The resulting weighted average fair values for those Options and Performance Rights issued during the year are: fair value per instrument at grant Date

name

number of options anD performanCe rights

grant Date

exerCise priCe per instrument expiry Date

first exerCise Date

last exerCise Date

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro E. Noyrez total

1,057,402 September 25, 2012 439,806 September 25, 2012 453,172 September 25, 2012 1,312,853 September 25, 2012 3,263,233

$0.26 $0.72 $0.26 $0.72

$1.02 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2017 $0.00 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2017 $1.02 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2017 $0.00 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2017

All Options or Performance Rights granted for the benefit of Directors and the Executives have three-year vesting periods. The Options and Performance Rights are exercisable between three and five years after the Options have been granted, subject to achievement of the relevant performance hurdles. The following tables outline the Options and Performance Rights issued for the benefit of Directors and the KMP during the 2013 and 2012 financial years and those Options which have vested at each respective year-end.
June 30, 2013 options exerCiseD/ CanCelleD/ forfeiteD/ grant Date other options expireD without exerCise amount vesteD at June 30, 2013

balanCe at beginning of perioD

granteD

net Change

balanCe at enD of perioD

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro K. Conlon N. Curtis(1) D. Davidson(2) W. Forde A. Jury(3) J. Klein E. Noyrez(4) Z. Switkowski total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(5)

6,835,000 2,060,000 2,000,000 – 30,000,000 3,100,000 4,000,000 – 3,100,000 10,000,000 – 61,095,000

1,057,402 September 25, 2012 439,806 September 25, 2012 453,172 September 25, 2012 – – – – – – – 3,263,233 – – – – – –

(750,000) (100,000) – – (600,000) (750,000) – (600,000) – (8,800,000)

– (200,000) – – – – – – – – –

307,402 139,806 453,172 – (600,000) (750,000) – (600,000) (187,147) –

7,142,402 2,199,806 2,453,172 – 2,500,000 3,250,000 – 2,500,000 9,812,853 –

4,400,000 450,000 – – 17,000,000 1,900,000 2,500,000 – 1,900,000 5,000,000 –

– (4,500,000)

(4,500,000) 25,500,000

1,312,853 September 25, 2012 (1,500,000)

(200,000) (5,736,767) 55,358,233 33,150,000

Ceased to be a member of the Executive, and assumed the role of Non-Executive Chairman, with effect from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. Appointed as Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs with effect from April 2, 2013. Appointed as CEO and an Executive Director, and ceased to act as COO and President, with effect from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013.

52

remuneration report – auDiteD

June 30, 2012 options exerCiseD/ CanCelleD/ forfeiteD/ other(1) options expireD without exerCise amount vesteD at June 30, 2012

balanCe at beginning of perioD

granteD

grant Date

net Change

balanCe at enD of perioD

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro K. Conlon(3) N. Curtis D. Davidson W. Forde J. Klein E. Noyrez Z. Switkowski J. G. Taylor(4) M. James(5) total
(2)

5,900,000 850,000 – 3,100,000 4,000,000 3,100,000 – 7,250,000

935,000 1,210,000 – – – – – –

September 23, 2011 September 23, 2011 December 12, 2011 – November 30, 2011(6) – – – September 23, 2011 – September 23, 2011 –

– – – – – – – – – – (3,520,000)

– – – – – – – – – –

935,000 1,210,000 2,000,000 – – – – – (2,500,000) (7,250,000)

6,835,000 2,060,000 2,000,000 – 3,100,000 4,000,000 3,100,000 – – –

2,000,000 450,000 – – 5,000,000 800,000 1,100,000 800,000 – – – –

– 2,000,000 31,000,000 4,000,000

(5,000,000) (1,000,000) 30,000,000

8,000,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 1,020,000 65,700,000 11,165,000

2,000,000 10,000,000

(5,250,000) (2,000,000)

(8,770,000) (7,000,000) (4,605,000) 61,095,000 10,150,000

(1) Other represents the de-recognition of Options and Performance Rights of individuals no longer members of the KMP or who have resigned their employment with the Group. (2) Appointed CFO with effect from December 12, 2011. (3) Appointed as a Non-Executive Director with effect from November 1, 2011. (4) Ceased as a member of the KMP on December 12, 2011, all Options on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure. (5) Resigned August 31, 2011, all Options on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure. (6) The Options issued to Mr. Curtis were approved by the Board on September 23, 2011 subject to shareholder approval, and subsequently approved by the shareholders of the Company at the AGM on November 30, 2011.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

53

Directors’ report

future Development
The Group regularly reports quarterly information regarding developments in the operations of the Group. Most recently, the Group indicated that, in response to challenging Rare Earths market conditions, it has taken a number of steps to strengthen its position during this subdued period, and in turn, be ready to respond to improved market conditions. The Group has decided to optimise its production levels at LAMP at the Phase 1 capacity level of 11,000 tonnes per annum REO until market prices recover. The Group will continue with the commissioning of the Phase 2 expansion of the LAMP ahead of an expected start-up in Q3 2013. The subsequent ramp up of Phase 2 production will be determined by various factors, primarily being market conditions.

subsequent events
On September 13, 2013 the Group entered into a deed of amendment to modify certain provisions under the Sojitz Loan Facility. Reference should be made to note 23 to the Financial Report for further details. With the exception of the above, there have been no other events subsequent to June 30, 2013 that would require accrual or disclosure in this financial report.

The Directors’ report is signed in accordance with a resolution of Directors made pursuant to s.298(2) of the Corporations Act 2001. On behalf of the Directors

nicholas Curtis Chairman Sydney September 13, 2013

54

Directors’ Declaration

The Directors declare that: (a) (b) (c) in the Directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable; in the Directors’ opinion, the attached financial report is in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as stated in note 2.1 to the financial report; in the Directors’ opinion, the attached financial report and notes thereto are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including compliance with accounting standards and giving a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the Group; and the Directors have been given the declarations required by s.295A of the Corporations Act 2001.

(d)

At the date of this declaration, the Company is within the class of companies affected by ASIC Class Order 98/1418. The nature of the deed of cross guarantee is such that each company which is party to the deed guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in accordance with the deed of cross guarantee. In the Directors’ opinion, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company and the companies to which the ASIC Class Order applies, as detailed in note 33 to the financial report will, as a group, be able to meet any obligations or liabilities to which they are, or may become, subject by virtue of the deed of cross guarantee. Signed in accordance with a resolution of the directors made pursuant to s.295(5) of the Corporations Act 2001.

On behalf of the Directors

nicholas Curtis Chairman Sydney September 13, 2013

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

55

inDepenDent auDitor’s report

Ernst & Young 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia GPO Box 2646 Sydney NSW 2001

Tel: +61 2 9248 5555 Fax: +61 2 9248 5959 ey.com/au

Independent auditor's report to the members of Lynas Corporation Limited
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Lynas Corporation Limited which comprises the consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2013, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, notes comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information, and the directors' declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year's end or from time to time during the financial year. Directors' responsibility for the financial report The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal controls as the directors determine are necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In Note 2, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements, that the financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards. Auditor's responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal controls relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal controls. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Independence In conducting our audit we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001. We have given to the directors of the company a written Auditor’s Independence Declaration, a copy of which is included in the directors’ report.

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

56

inDepenDent auDitor’s report

Auditor’s Opinion In our opinion: a. the financial report of Lynas Corporation Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including: i ii b. giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity's financial position as at 30 June 2013 and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 2.

Report on the remuneration report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in the directors' report for the year ended 30 June 2013. The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Remuneration Report, based on our audit conducted in accordance with International Auditing Standards. Auditor’s Opinion In our opinion, the Remuneration Report of Lynas Corporation Limited for the year ended 30 June 2013, complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.

Ernst & Young

Graham Ezzy Partner Sydney 13 September 2013

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

57

auDitor’s inDepenDence Declaration

Ernst & Young 680 George Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia GPO Box 2646 Sydney NSW 2001

Tel: +61 2 9248 5555 Fax: +61 2 9248 5959 ey.com/au

Auditor’s Independence Declaration to the Directors of Lynas Corporation Limited
In relation to our audit of the financial report of Lynas Corporation Limited for the financial year ended 30 June 2013, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 or any applicable code of professional conduct.

Ernst & Young

Graham Ezzy Partner Sydney 13 September 2013

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

58

consoliDateD statement of comprehensive income

for the year enDeD in a$’000 note

June 30, 2013 2012

Revenue Cost of sales* gross profit (loss) Other income General and administration expenses* Other expenses* profit (loss) from operating activities Financial income Financial expenses net financial income (expenses) profit (loss) before income tax Income tax benefit (expense) profit (loss) for the year other comprehensive income (loss) for the period net of income tax that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations Gain (loss) on the revaluation of available for sale financial assets total other comprehensive income (loss) for the year, net of income tax total comprehensive income (loss) for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company earnings (loss) per share Basic loss per share (cents per share) Diluted loss per share (cents per share)
* For more information on expenses by nature, reference should be made to notes 8, 9, 10, 17 and 31.

950 (950) – 7 9 11 11 9,795 (125,124) (13,082) (128,411) 4,767 (17,370) (12,603) (141,014) 12 (2,541) (143,555)

– – – – (74,124) (15,928) (90,052) 2,840 (10,667) (7,827) (97,879) 10,109 (87,770)

14 14

37,015 (865) 36,150 (107,405)

(10,191) (4,653) (14,844) (102,614) (5.12) (5.12)

26 26

(7.71) (7.71)

The Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

59

consoliDateD statement of financial position

for the year enDeD in a$’000 note

June 30, 2013 2012

assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Current tax receivables Prepayments Inventories total current assets Inventories Available for sale – financial assets Property, plant and equipment Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Intangible assets – software Other assets total non-current assets total assets liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Current tax liabilities Employee benefits Provisions Deferred income total current liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Provisions Employee benefits total non-current liabilities total liabilities net assets equity Share capital Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) Reserves total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company 26 26 994,645 (430,691) 64,754 628,708 823,161 (287,136) 27,469 563,494 22 23 25 24 24 25 7 22 23 (33,515) (10,949) – (3,650) (16,520) (5,420) (70,054) (782) (447,068) (40,865) (207) (488,922) (558,976) 628,708 (46,369) – (120) (1,382) (3,061) – (50,932) (1,962) (403,062) (3,777) (430) (409,231) (460,163) 563,494 19 17 18 20 21 17 15 16 141,371 1,765 49 3,946 78,380 225,511 14,555 1,802 880,335 47,654 431 17,396 962,173 1,187,684 205,438 932 – 1,538 52,419 260,327 13,272 3,754 706,603 26,342 321 13,038 763,330 1,023,657

The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.

60

consoliDateD statement of chanGes in equity

in a$’000

foreign CurrenCy share aCCumulateD translation Capital DefiCit reserve

equity settleD employee investment benefits revaluation reserve reserve

other reserves

total

balance at the beginning of the year Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period Total income (loss) for the period Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year Issue of shares, net of issue costs Exercise of options, net of issue costs Employee remuneration settled through share-based payments balance at June 30, 2013 balance at the beginning of the year Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period Total income (loss) for the period Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year Exercise of options, net of issue costs Equity component of the Mt Kellett convertible bonds Deferred tax on the issue of the Mt Kellett convertible bonds Employee remuneration settled through share-based payments balance at June 30, 2012

823,161 – – 823,161 171,258 226 – 994,645 821,994 – – 821,994 1,167 – – – 823,161

(287,136) – (143,555) (430,691) – – – (430,691) (199,366) – (87,770) (287,136) – – – – (287,136)

(36,132) 37,015 – 883 – – – 883 (25,941) (10,191) – (36,132) – – – – (36,132)

33,993 – – 33,993 – – 1,135 35,128 24,562 – – 24,562 – – – 9,431 33,993

865 (865) – – – – – – 5,518 (4,653) – 865 – – – – 865

28,743 – – 28,743 – – – 28,743 – – – – – 40,936 (12,193) – 28,743

563,494 36,150 (143,555) 456,089 171,258 226 1,135 628,708 626,767 (14,844) (87,770) (524,153) 1,167 40,936 (12,193) 9,431 563,494

The Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

61

consoliDateD statement of cash flows

for the year enDeD in a$’000 note

June 30, 2013 2012

Cash flows from operating activities Receipts from customers Receipt of government grants Payments to suppliers and employees Royalties paid Income taxes (paid) received net cash flows from (used in) operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Payment for property, plant and equipment Payment for deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Payment for intangible assets Security bonds paid Security bonds refunded Payment for available for sale financial assets net cash from (used in) investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Drawdown of loans and borrowings Mt Kellett convertible bonds Interest received Interest and other financing costs paid Proceeds from the issue of share capital Payment of transaction costs – Issue of shares Proceeds from the issue of share capital resulting from the exercise of options Payment of transaction costs – Issue of Mt Kellett convertible bonds net cash from (used in) financing activities net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year Effect of exchange rate fluctuations (net) on cash held Closing cash and cash equivalents 15

597 15,216 (121,293) (558) (204) (106,242) (111,351) (102) (90) (3,053) 349 – (114,247)

– – (86,847) – (66) (86,913) (339,373) (111) (125) (9,568) 260 (749) (349,666)

– 4,984 (19,741) 175,000 (5,350) 226 – 155,119 (65,370) 205,438 1,303 141,371

211,864 6,027 (12,244) – – 1,167 (625) 206,189 (230,390) 433,956 1,872 205,438

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements.

62

consoliDateD statement of cash flows

Reconciliation of the profit (loss) for the year with the net cash from (used in) operating activities for the year enDeD in a$’000 note June 30, 2013 2012

Profit (loss) for the year Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortisation Employee remuneration settled through share-based payments Impairment loss on property, plant and equipment & other Impairment loss on deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Impairment loss on inventories Net financial (income) expenses Income tax (benefit) expense Income taxes (paid) received Change in trade and other receivables Change in inventories Change in trade and other payables Change in other assets and liabilities Change in provisions and employee benefits Change in deferred income Foreign exchange net cash from (used in) operating activities 9 9 9 11 12 17

(143,555) 16,567 1,135 3,950 – 9,132 12,603 2,541 (204) (997) (22,673) (12) (4,358) 15,504 5,420 (1,295) (106,242)

(87,770) 1,349 9,431 4,770 2,613 8,545 7,827 (10,109) (66) 2,524 (37,649) 9,789 (9,307) 1,713 – 9,427 (86,913)

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

63

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

1.

reporting entity

Lynas Corporation Limited (the “Company”) is a for-profit company domiciled and incorporated in Australia. The financial report of Lynas Corporation Limited as at and for the year ended June 30, 2013 comprises the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”) and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly controlled entities. The Group is principally engaged in the extraction and processing of rare earth minerals, primarily in Australia and Malaysia. The address of the registered office of the Company is Level 7, 56 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia.

2.
2.1

basis of presentation
Statement of compliance

The financial report is a general purpose financial report and has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards (“AASBs”) adopted by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (“AASB”) and the Corporations Act 2001. The financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards and Interpretations (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).The financial report was approved by the Board of Directors (the “Directors”) on September 13, 2013.

2.2 2.3

Going concern Basis of measurement

The financial report has been prepared using the going concern assumption. The financial report has been prepared under the historical cost convention except certain components of inventory which are measured at net realisable value, derivatives and certain available for sale financial assets (being listed securities) which are measured at fair value and certain non-current assets that are presented on a revalued amount. The methods used to measure fair values are discussed further in note 5. Information as disclosed in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the current year is for the 12 month period ended June 30, 2013. Information for the comparative year is for the 12 month period ended June 30, 2012.

2.4

Presentation currency

The financial report of the Company and the Group is presented in Australian Dollars (“AUD”), which is both the Company’s and the Group’s presentation currency.

2.5

Rounding of amounts

The Company is of a kind referred to in Class order 98/100, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in relation to the “rounding off” of amounts. Amounts in the financial report have been rounded off in accordance with the Class Order relief to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, the nearest dollar.

2.6

Use of estimates and judgements

The preparation of the financial report requires the Directors to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. These estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the year in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that year or in the year of the revision and future years if the revision affects both the current and future years. Information about the significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most material effect on the amounts recognised in the financial report are described in note 4.

2.7

Reclassification of comparative information

Certain elements of the information presented for comparative purposes have been revised to conform with the current year presentation.

64

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.
3.1
(a)

summary of signifiCant aCCounting poliCies
Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all years presented in this financial report and have been applied consistently by all Group entities.

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company or the Group. Control exists when the Company or the Group has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that are presently exercisable are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the financial report from the date control (or effective control) commences until the date that control ceases. The Group has adopted AASB 3 Business Combinations (2008) and AASB 127 Consolidated and Separate Financial Statement (2008) under which the acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries and businesses by the Group. The cost of an acquisition is measured at the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of the acquisition, including the fair value of any contingent consideration and share-based payment awards (as measured in accordance with AASB 2 Share Based Payment) of the acquiree that are mandatorily replaced as a result of the transaction. Transaction costs that the Group incurs in connection with an acquisition are expensed as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured at their fair value at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interests. Non-controlling interests are initially recognised at their proportionate share of the fair value of the net assets acquired. During the measurement year an acquirer can report provisional information for a business combination if by the end of the reporting year in which the combination occurs the accounting is incomplete. The measurement year, however, ends at the earlier of when the acquirer has received all of the necessary information to determine the fair values or one year from the date of the acquisition.

(b)

Associates

Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control, over the financial and operating policies (generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights). Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are initially recognised at cost. Investments in associates include goodwill identified on acquisition, net of accumulated impairment losses (if any). The Group’s share of its associates’ post-acquisition profits or losses and movements in other comprehensive income is recognised in the Group’s statement of comprehensive income (after adjustments (as required) are made to align the accounting policies of the associate with those of the Group). The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. When the Group’s share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity accounted investee, the carrying amount of that interest (including any long-term investments) is reduced to nil and the recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Group has a financial obligation or has made payments on behalf of the investee.

(c)

Joint ventures

Joint ventures are those operations, entities or assets in which the Group has joint control, established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic, financial and operating decisions. Interests in jointly controlled entities are accounted for using the equity method of accounting (as described in note 3.1(b)). Interests in jointly controlled assets and operations are reported in the financial report by including the Group’s share of assets employed in the joint venture, the share of liabilities incurred in relation to the joint venture and the share of any expenses incurred in relation to the joint venture in their respective classification categories.

(d)

Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Intra-group balances and unrealised items of income and expense arising from intra-group transactions are eliminated in preparing the financial report. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with associates are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same manner as gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

(e)

Transactions and non-controlling interests

The Group accounts for transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with the equity owners of the Group. For purchases from non-controlling interests, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity. When the Group ceases to have control or significant influence, any retained interest in the entity is re-measured to its fair value, with the change in carrying amount recognised in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Group had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss. If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

65

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(f)

Transactions between entities under common control

Common control transactions arise between entities that are under the ultimate ownership of the Company. Certain transactions between entities that are under common control may not be transacted on an arm’s length basis. Accordingly any gains or losses on these types of transactions are recognised directly in equity. Examples of such transactions include but are not limited to: • debt forgiveness transactions; • transfer of assets for greater than or less than fair value; and • acquisition or disposal of subsidiaries for no consideration or consideration greater than or less than fair value.

3.2
(a)

Foreign currency
Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the financial report of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”).

(b)

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are translated to the functional currency of the respective entities at the exchange rate at that date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at historical cost are translated to the functional currency of the respective entities at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are measured at fair value are translated to the functional currency of the respective entities at the exchange rate at the date that the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising on translation are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss, except for differences arising on the translation of a financial liability designated as a hedge of the net investment in a foreign operation (see (c) further).

(c)

Foreign operations

The results and financial position of those entities that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency of the Group are translated into the Group’s presentation currency as follows: • assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the closing rate at the reporting date of the statement of financial position; • income and expense items for each profit or loss item are translated at average exchange rates; • items of other comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates; and • all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. On consolidation, exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign entities and of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments are recognised as a component of equity and included in the foreign currency translation reserve. When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on the sale. Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and are translated on this basis.

(d)

Changes in functional currency

Any change in a Group company’s functional currency is applied prospectively from the date of the change. All items are translated into the new functional currency using the exchange rate at the date of the change. The resultant translated amounts for non-monetary items are thereafter treated as their historical cost. Following the issue of the Mt Kellett convertible bonds, the primary economic environment in which the Company operates was changed. Management performed a functional currency review and concluded that the functional currency of the Company should change prospectively to the United States dollar (“USD”), effective as of January 24, 2012. Prior to this date the functional currency of the Company was the AUD.

3.3

Non-derivative financial instruments

Non-derivative financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, receivables, available for sale financial assets, trade and other payables, interest bearing borrowings and compound instruments.

66

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

A non-derivative financial instrument is recognised if the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Non-derivative financial assets are derecognised if the Group’s contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial assets expire or if the Group transfers the financial asset to another party without retaining control or substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset. Non-derivative financial liabilities are derecognised if the Group’s obligations specified in the contract expire or are discharged or cancelled. Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised initially at fair value plus, for instruments not at fair value through the profit or loss, any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative financial instruments are measured as described further. Non-derivative financial instruments are recognised on a gross basis unless a current and legally enforceable right to off-set exists and the Group intends to either settle the instrument net or realise the asset and liability simultaneously. Upon initial acquisition the Group classifies its financial instruments in one of the following categories, which is dependent on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired.

(a)

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, restricted cash and other short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of less than three months. Bank overdrafts are included within borrowings and are classified as current liabilities on the statement of financial position except where these are repayable on demand, in which case they are included separately as a component of current liabilities. In the statement of cash flows, overdrafts are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents.

(b)

Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss

An instrument is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial instruments are designated at fair value through profit or loss if the Group manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions based on the instrument’s fair value. Upon initial recognition (at the trade date) attributable transaction costs are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. Subsequent to initial recognition, financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss.

(c)

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for instruments with maturities greater than 12 months from the reporting date, which are classified as non-current assets. The Group’s loans and receivables comprise trade and other receivables (including related party receivables) which are stated at their cost less impairment losses.

(d)

Held-to-maturity investments

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity dates that the Group has the positive intention to hold to maturity. Subsequent to initial recognition, held-to-maturity investments are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses. The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial instrument and allocating the interest over the relevant years. The effective interest method results in an interest rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts over the expected life of the financial instrument, or, where appropriate, a shorter period to the net amount of the financial instrument.

(e)

Available-for-sale financial assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the reporting date. Available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value on initial recognition plus transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on available-for-sale monetary items, are recognised directly in equity. When an investment is derecognised, the cumulative gain or loss in equity is transferred to the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss.

(f)

Other liabilities

Other liabilities comprise all non-derivative financial liabilities that are not disclosed as liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. Other liabilities are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the reporting date. The Group’s other liabilities comprise trade and other payables and interest bearing borrowings, including compound instruments and those with related parties. The Group’s other liabilities are measured as follows: (i) Trade and other payables Subsequent to initial recognition trade and other payables are stated at amortised cost using the effective interest method. (ii) Interest bearing borrowings including related party borrowings Subsequent to initial recognition interest bearing loans and borrowings are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

67

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(g)

Compound financial instruments

Compound financial instruments issued by the Group comprise convertible notes that can be converted to share capital at the option of the holder, with the number of shares to be issued being fixed. The liability component of a compound financial instrument is recognised initially at the fair value of a similar financial liability that does not have the equity conversion option. The equity component is recognised initially as the difference between the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole and the fair value of the financial liability component. Any directly attributable transaction costs are then allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to their initial carrying amounts. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the liability component of a compound financial instrument is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The equity component of a compound financial instrument is not re-measured subsequent to initial recognition. Interest related to the financial liability is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. On conversion the financial liability is reclassified to equity and no gain or loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

3.4

Derivative financial instruments

A derivative financial instrument is recognised if the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of an instrument at the trade date. Derivative financial instruments are initially recognised at fair value (which includes, where applicable, consideration of credit risk), with transaction costs being expensed as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivative financial instruments are stated at fair value. The gain or loss on re-measurement to fair value is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss unless the derivative financial instruments qualify for hedge accounting. Where a derivative financial instrument qualifies for hedge accounting, recognition of any resulting gain or loss depends on the nature of the hedging relationship (see further below). Derivative financial instruments are recognised on a gross basis unless a current and legally enforceable right to off-set exists. Derivative financial assets are derecognised if the Group’s contractual right to the cash flows from the instrument expire or if the Group transfers the financial asset to another party without retaining control or substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset. Derivative financial liabilities are derecognised if the Group’s obligations specified in the contract expire or are discharged or cancelled.

(a)

Cash flow hedges

Changes in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument designated as a cash flow hedge are recognised directly in equity as a component of other comprehensive income to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss for the year. If a hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting or it expires, is sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. At this point in time, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognised in equity remains there until the forecast transaction occurs. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognised in equity is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognised. In all other cases the amount recognised in equity is transferred within the statement of comprehensive income in the same year that the hedged item affects this statement and is recognised as part of financial income or expenses. If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was reported in equity is immediately transferred within the statement of comprehensive income and is recognised as part of financial income or expenses in the profit or loss.

(b)

Fair value hedges

Changes in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument designated as a fair value hedge are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss in financial income or expenses together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities that are attributable to the hedged risk.

(c)

Embedded derivatives

Embedded derivatives are separated from the host contract and accounted for separately if the following conditions are met: • the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract and the embedded derivative are not closely related; • a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would meet the definition of a derivative; and • the combined instrument is not measured at fair value through profit or loss. At the time of initial recognition of the embedded derivative an equal adjustment is also recognised against the host contract. The adjustment against the host contract is amortised over the remaining life of the host contract using the effective interest method. Any embedded derivatives that are separated are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognised through net financial expense in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss.

68

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.5
(a)

Inventories
Raw materials, work in progress and finished goods

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of inventories is based either on the first in first out (“FIFO”) or weighted average principles and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. In the case of manufactured or refined inventories and work in progress, cost includes an appropriate share of production overheads based on normal operating capacity. Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and selling expenses. Inventory expected to be sold or consumed within the next 12 months is classified as current, with amounts expected to be consumed or sold after this time being classified as non-current.

(b)

Engineering and maintenance materials

Engineering and maintenance materials (representing either critical or long order components but excluding rotable spares) are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The cost of these inventories is based on the weighted average principle and includes expenditure incurred in acquiring the inventories and bringing them to their existing location and condition. Net realisable value is determined with reference to the cost of replacement of such items in the ordinary course of business compared to the current market prices.

3.6
(a)

Property, plant and equipment
Recognition and measurement

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses (if any). Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of property, plant and equipment acquired in a business combination is determined by reference to its fair value at the date of acquisition. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labour and any other costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition for its intended use. Cost may also include transfers from equity of any gains or losses on qualifying cash flow hedges of foreign currency purchases of property, plant and equipment. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related equipment is capitalised as part of the cost of that equipment.

(b)

Assets under construction

Assets under construction are transferred to the appropriate asset category when they are ready for their intended use. Assets under construction are not depreciated but tested for impairment at least annually or when there is an indication of impairment.

(c)

Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of an item of property, plant and equipment are capitalised until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. The interest rate used equates to the effective interest on debt where general borrowings are used or the relevant interest rate where specific borrowings are used to finance the construction.

(d)

Subsequent costs

The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within that part will flow to the Group and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognised. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as incurred.

(e)

Depreciation

Depreciation is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss or capitalised as a component of inventory in the statement of financial position (which is subsequently released to the profit or loss through the cost of goods sold on the sale of the underlying product) using a method that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits embodied within the asset are consumed. Generally this is on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each part or component of an item of property, plant and equipment. The estimated useful lives for the material classes of property, plant and equipment are as follows: Leasehold land Plant and Equipment Leasehold improvements 30 to 99 years 4 to 25 years 5 to 30 years Buildings Fixtures and fittings Motor vehicles 10 to 30 years 3 to 15 years 7 to 8 years

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reassessed on an annual basis. Gains and losses on the disposal of items of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds (if any) at the time of disposal with the net carrying amount of the asset.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

69

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.7
(a)

Mineral exploration, evaluation and development expenditure
Exploration and evaluation expenditure

Exploration and evaluation expenditure incurred is accumulated in respect of each identifiable area of interest. Exploration and evaluation expenditure includes: • researching and analysing historical exploration data; • gathering exploration data through topographical, geochemical and geophysical studies; • exploratory drilling, trenching and sampling; • determining and examining the volume and grade of the mineral resource; • surveying transportation and infrastructure requirements; • conducting market and finance studies; • administration costs that are directly attributable to a specific exploration area; and • licensing costs. These costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to be recouped through the successful development of the area of interest, or where activities in the area have not yet reached a stage that permits a reasonable assessment of the existence or otherwise of economically recoverable reserves. A regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area of interest are written off in full in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss in the period in which the decision to abandon the area is made.

(b)

Development expenditure

Once an area of interest has been established as commercially viable and technically feasible, expenditure other than that relating to land, buildings and plant and equipment is capitalised as development expenditure. Development expenditure includes previously capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure, pre-production development expenditure and other subsurface expenditure pertaining to that area of interest. Costs related to surface plant and equipment and any associated land and buildings are accounted for as property, plant and equipment. Development costs are accumulated in respect of each separate area of interest. Costs associated with commissioning new assets in the period before they are capable of operating in the manner intended by management, are capitalised. Development costs incurred after the commencement of production are capitalised to the extent they are expected to give rise to a future economic benefit. When an area of interest is abandoned or the Directors decide that it is not commercially viable or technically feasible, any accumulated costs in respect of that area are written off in full in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss in the period in which the decision to abandon the area is made to the extent that they will not be recoverable in the future. Development assets are assessed for impairment if the facts and circumstance suggest that the carrying amount exceed the recoverable amount. For the purpose of impairment testing, development assets are allocated to the cash-generating units (“CGUs”) to which the development activity relates.

(c)

Deferred stripping

Overburden and other mine waste materials are often removed during the initial development of a mine in order to access the mineral deposit. This activity is referred to as development or pre-production stripping. The directly attributable costs associated with these activities are capitalised as a component of development costs. Capitalisation of development stripping ceases and amortisation of those capitalised costs commences upon extraction of ore. Amortisation of capitalised development stripping costs occurs on a straight line basis with reference to the life of mine of the relevant area of interest. Removal of waste material normally continues through the life of a mine. This activity is referred to as production stripping and commences upon the extraction of ore.

(d)

Amortisation of development

Amortisation of development is recognised either in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss or capitalised as a component of inventory in the statement of financial position (which is subsequently released to the profit or loss through the cost of goods sold on the sale of the underlying product) on a units of production basis which aims to recognise cost proportionally to the depletion of the economically recoverable mineral resources. Costs are amortised from the commencement of commercial production.

70

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.8
(a)

Intangible assets
Goodwill

Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and business operations and is recognised at the date that control is acquired (the acquisition date). Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the fair value of the acquirer’s previously-held equity interest (if any) in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable net assets recognised. When the excess is negative, it is recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as a bargain purchase gain. Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses (if any) and is tested at least annually for impairment. Goodwill is not amortised and is allocated to CGUs for the purpose of impairment testing. The allocation is made to the CGUs that are expected to benefit from the business combination in which the goodwill arose after the allocation of purchase consideration is finalised. In respect of joint ventures and investments accounted for using the equity method, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the investment and is tested for impairment at least annually as part of the overall investment balance.

(b)

Research and development

Expenditure on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technological knowledge and understanding, is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as incurred. Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially improved products and processes. Development expenditure is capitalised only if development costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technologically and commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable and the Group intends to and has sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. The expenditure capitalised includes the cost of materials, direct labour and overhead costs that are directly attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Other development expenditure is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as incurred. Intangible assets arising from development activities are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses (if any).

(c)

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets comprise internally developed software (which is capitalised in accordance with the Group’s policy in respect of Research and Development as outlined at note 3.8(b)). Other intangible assets have finite useful lives and are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairment losses (if any).

(d)

Subsequent expenditure

Subsequent expenditure in respect of intangible assets is capitalised only when the expenditure increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which the expenditure relates and it can be reliably measured. All other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill and other intangibles, is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as incurred.

(e)

Amortisation

Amortisation is recognised in either the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss or capitalised as a component of inventory in the statement of financial position (which is subsequently released to the profit or loss through the cost of goods sold on the sale of the underlying product) on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets, other than goodwill and indefinite life trademarks, from the date that the intangible assets are available for use. The estimated useful lives for the material classes of intangible assets are as follows: Software/technology 4 to 5 years

3.9

Impairment

The carrying amounts of the Group’s assets are reviewed regularly and at least annually to determine whether there is any objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognised whenever the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount. Impairment losses directly reduce the carrying amount of assets and are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss.

(a)

Impairment of loans and receivables and held-to-maturity financial assets

The recoverable amount of the Group’s loans and receivables and held-to-maturity financial assets carried at amortised cost is calculated with reference to the present value of the estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate (i.e. the effective interest rate computed at the date of initial recognition of these financial assets). Receivables with a short duration are not discounted. Impairment losses on individual instruments that are considered significant are determined on an individual basis through an evaluation of the specific instruments’ exposures. For trade receivables which are not significant on an individual basis, impairment is assessed on a portfolio basis taking into consideration the number of days overdue and the historical loss experiences on a portfolio with a similar number of days overdue.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

71

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

The criteria that the Group uses to determine that there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include: • significant financial difficulty of the issuer or obligor; • a breach of contract, such as default or delinquency in respect of interest or principal repayment; or • observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a portfolio.

(b)

Non-financial assets

The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets are reviewed at least annually to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indicators exist then the asset or CGU’s recoverable amount is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not yet available for use, recoverable amounts are estimated at least annually and whenever there is an indication that they may be impaired. An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or its CGU exceeds its recoverable amount. A CGU is the smallest identifiable asset group that generates cash flows that are largely independent from other assets and groups. Impairment losses are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. Impairment losses recognised in respect of a CGU are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other non-financial assets in the CGU on a pro-rata basis. The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or CGU. In assessing the fair value less cost to sell, the Company uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each reporting date. The methods used to determine fair value include a discounted future cash flow analysis and adjusted EBITDA (forecasted) multiplied by a relevant market indexed multiple. In respect of assets other than goodwill, impairment losses recognised in prior years are assessed at each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s revised carrying amount will not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.

3.10 Assets and liabilities classified as held for sale
Assets (or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities) that are expected to be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use are classified as held for sale. Immediately before classification as held for sale, the assets or components of a disposal group are re-measured in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies. Thereafter the assets (or disposal groups) are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Upon reclassification the Group ceases to depreciate or amortise non-current assets classified as held for sale. Any impairment loss on a disposal group is first allocated to goodwill and then to the remaining assets on a pro-rata basis, except that no loss is allocated to inventories, financial assets, deferred tax assets or employee benefit assets, which continue to be measured in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies. Impairment losses incurred on the initial classification as being held for sale and subsequent gains or losses on re-measurement are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. Gains are not recognised in excess of any prior cumulative impairment loss.

3.11
(a)

Employee benefits
Pension and superannuation obligations

A defined contribution pension and superannuation plan is a plan under which the employee and the Group pay fixed contributions to a separate entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions in relation to an employee’s service in the current and prior years. The contributions are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as and when they fall due.

(b)

Short-term employee benefits

Short-term employee benefits are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss as the related services are provided. A provision is recognised for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus plans and outstanding annual leave balances if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past services provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably.

(c)

Other long-term employee benefits

The liability for long service leave for which settlement can be deferred beyond 12 months from the balance date is measured as the present value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible, the estimated future cash outflows.

72

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(d)

Termination benefits

Termination benefits are recognised as an expense when the Group is demonstrably committed, without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to terminate employment before the normal retirement date. Termination benefits for voluntary redundancies are recognised if the Group has made an offer encouraging voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted and the number of acceptances can be estimated reliably.

(e)

Incentive compensation plans

The Group recognises a liability and associated expense for incentive compensation plans based on a formula that takes into consideration certain threshold targets and the associated measures of profitability. The Group recognises a provision when it is contractually obligated or when there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation to its employees.

3.12

Provisions

A provision is recognised if, as a result of a past event, the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefit will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision for the passage of time is recognised as a financial expense in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss.

(a)

Warranties

A provision for warranties is recognised when the underlying products or services are sold. The provision is based on historical warranty data and a weighting of all possible outcomes against their associated probabilities.

(b)

Business closure and rationalisation

A provision for business closure and rationalisation is recognised when the Group has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan, and the restructuring has either commenced or has been publicly announced. Future operating costs are not provided for.

(c)

Rehabilitation

The mining/extraction and refining/processing activities of the Group give rise to obligations for asset and site rehabilitation. Rehabilitation obligations can include facility decommissioning and dismantling, removal or treatment of waste materials, land rehabilitation and site restoration. The extent of work required and the associated costs are estimated based on feasibility and engineering studies using current restoration standards and techniques. Provisions for the cost of each rehabilitation programme are recognised at the time that the environmental disturbance occurs. Rehabilitation provisions are initially measured at the expected value of future cash flows required to rehabilitate the relevant site, discounted to their present value. The value of the provision is progressively increased over time as the effect of discounting unwinds. When provisions for rehabilitation are initially recognised, the corresponding cost is capitalised as an asset, representing part of the cost of acquiring the future economic benefits of the operation. The capitalised cost of rehabilitation activities for the Group’s mining operations is recognised as a component of “development expenditure”, whereas those relating to its refining operations are recognised as a component of either “buildings” or “plant and equipment”. Amounts capitalised are depreciated or amortised accordingly. Where rehabilitation is expected to be conducted systematically over the life of the operation, rather than at the time of closure, a provision is made for the present obligation or estimated outstanding continuous rehabilitation work at each balance sheet date with the costs recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss in line with the remaining future cash flows. At each reporting date the rehabilitation liability is re-measured to account for any new disturbance, updated cost estimates, changes to the estimated lives of the associated operations, new regulatory requirements and revisions to discount rates. Changes to the rehabilitation liability are added or deducted from the related rehabilitation asset and amortised accordingly.

3.13

Royalties

Royalties are treated as taxation arrangements when they have the characteristics of a tax. This is considered to be the case when they are imposed under government authority and the amount payable is calculated by reference to revenue derived (net of any allowable deductions) after adjustment for temporary differences. For such arrangements, current and deferred tax is provided on the same basis as described in note 3.20(a) for other forms of taxation. Obligations arising from royalty arrangements that do not satisfy these criteria are recognised as current provisions (as outlined in note 3.12) and included as part of the cost of goods sold in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of profit or loss.

3.14 Dividends
Dividends to the Group’s shareholders are recognised as a liability in the Group’s statement of financial position in the period in which the dividends are declared.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

73

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.15

Share capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares are shown in equity as a deduction from the proceeds. Where equity instruments are reacquired by the Group, for example, as a result of a share buy-back, those instruments are deducted from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. No gain or loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income and the consideration paid including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is directly recognised in equity.

3.16 Share-based payment
Share-based remuneration benefits are provided to employees via a variety of schemes which are further set out in note 30. The fair values of the options granted under these various schemes are recognised as an employee benefit expense with a corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at the grant date and recognised over the period during which the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The fair value at grant date is independently determined using an option pricing model that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the impact of dilution, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk free interest rate for the term of the option. The fair value of the options granted is measured to reflect the expected market vesting conditions, but excludes the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for example, profitability and production targets). Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. At the end of each reporting period, the Group revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. The employee benefits expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate. The impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of profit or loss, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.

3.17
(a)

Revenue
Sale of goods

Revenue from the sale of goods is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable net of returns and allowances, trade discounts, volume rebates and other customer incentives. Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been substantially transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, and there is no continuing management involvement with the goods. Transfers of risks and rewards vary depending on the individual terms of the contract of sale.

(b)

Government grants

Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that they will be received and that the Group will comply with the conditions associated with the grant. Grants that compensate the Group for an item which is to be expensed are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income on a systematic basis in the same years in which the expenses are recognised or, for expenses already incurred the grants are recognised in the year in which they become receivable. Grants that compensate the Group for the cost of purchasing, constructing or otherwise acquiring a long-term asset are recognised as a reduction in the cost of that asset and included in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of depreciation expense in accordance with the Group’s depreciation policy.

(c) (d)

Dividend income Royalties

Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established. Royalty revenue is recognised on an accruals basis in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreement (provided that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably). Royalties determined on a time basis are recognised on a straight-line basis over the period of the agreement. Royalty arrangements that are based on production, sales and other measures are recognised by reference to the underlying arrangement.

3.18 Lease payments
Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance charges and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charges which are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss are allocated to each year during the lease term so as to produce a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Contingent lease payments are accounted for in the years in which the payments are incurred. Payments made under operating leases are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. Contingent lease payments arising under operating leases are recognised as an expense in the year in which the payments are incurred.

74

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

In the event that lease incentives are received to enter into an operating lease, such incentives are deferred and recognised as a liability. The aggregated benefits of the lease incentives are recognised as a reduction to the lease expenses on a straight-line basis, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased assets are consumed.

3.19

Financial income and expenses

Financial income comprises interest income, foreign currency gains and gains on derivative financial instruments in respect of financing activities that are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. Interest income is recognised as it accrues using the effective interest method. Financial expenses comprise interest expense, foreign currency losses, impairment losses recognised on financial assets (except for trade receivables) and losses in respect of financing activities on derivative instruments that are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. All borrowing costs not qualifying for capitalisation are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss using the effective interest method.

3.20 Income tax
(a) Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognised directly in equity or other comprehensive income, in which case it is recognised with the associated items on a net basis. Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year using tax rates enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Deferred tax is recognised using the balance sheet method of providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the carrying amounts for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for the following temporary differences: the initial recognition of goodwill, the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit, and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities to the extent that they probably will not reverse in the foreseeable future and the Group is in a position to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences. Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date. A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised. Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends are recognised at the same time the liability to pay the related dividend is recognised. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the same jurisdiction are offset in the statement of financial position only to the extent that there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and current tax liabilities and the deferred balances relate to taxes levied by the same taxing authority and are expected either to be settled on a net basis or realised simultaneously.

(b)

Tax consolidation

The Company and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities have formed a tax-consolidated group with effect from July 1, 2002 and are therefore taxed as a single entity from that date. The head entity within the tax-consolidated group is Lynas Corporation Limited. Current tax liabilities and assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and relevant tax credits of the members of the tax-consolidated group are recognised by the Company (as head entity in the tax-consolidated group). Entities within the tax-consolidated group have entered into a tax sharing agreement with the Company. The tax sharing agreement entered into between members of the tax-consolidated group provides for the determination of the allocation of income tax liabilities between the entities should the Company default on its tax payment obligations or if an entity should leave the tax-consolidated group. The effect of the tax sharing agreement is that each member’s liability for tax payable by the tax-consolidated group is limited to the amount payable to the head entity under the tax funding arrangement.

3.21 Sales tax, value added tax and goods and services tax
All amounts (including cash flows) are shown exclusive of sales tax, value added tax (“VAT”) and goods and services tax (“GST”) to the extent the taxes are reclaimable, except for receivables and payables that are stated inclusive of sales tax, VAT and GST.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

75

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

3.22 Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

(a) (b)

The Group as lessor – finance leases The Group as lessee – finance leases

Amounts due from lessees under finance leases are recorded as receivables at the amount of the Group’s net investment in the leases. Upon initial recognition the leased asset is measured at an amount equal to the lower of its fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included within loans and borrowings as a finance lease obligation. Subsequent to initial recognition the liability is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy described at note 3.3(f) and the asset is accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.

3.23 Earnings per share
(a) Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit or loss attributable to equity holders of the Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial period, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the financial period.

(b)

Diluted earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share adjusts the amount used in the determination of the basic earnings per share to take into account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares and the weighted average number of additional shares that would have been outstanding assuming the conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. Potential ordinary shares are treated as dilutive when, and only when, their conversion to ordinary shares would decrease earnings per share from continuing operations.

3.24 Segment reporting
The Group’s operating segments are identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Group that are regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Makers (“CODM”) in order to allocate resources to the segment and to assess its performance.

3.25 Company entity financial information
The financial information for the Company entity as disclosed in note 34 has been prepared on the same basis as that applied by the Group, except as set out below:

(a)

Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities

Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities are accounted for at cost in the financial information of the Company. Dividends received from associates are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of profit or loss, rather than being deducted from the carrying amount of these investments.

(b)

Effect of tax consolidation

Current tax liabilities and assets and deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and relevant tax credits of the members of the tax-consolidated group, are accounted for by the Company rather than by the members of the tax-consolidated group themselves.

3.26 New and revised standards and interpretations
(a) Standards and Interpretations affecting amounts reported in the current period
The following new and revised Standards and Interpretations have been adopted in the current year. • AASB 2010-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets • AASB 2011-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income Their adoption has not had any significant impact on the amounts reported in this financial report but may affect the accounting for future transactions or arrangements.

76

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(b)

Standards and Interpretations in issue not yet adopted

At the date of authorisation of the financial report, the following Standards and Interpretations listed below were in issue but not yet effective. effeCtive for the annual reporting perioD beginning on expeCteD to be initially applieD in the finanCial year enDing

stanDarD/interpretation

Interpretation 20 Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine’ and AASB 2011-12 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from Interpretation 20 AASB 9 Financial Instruments, AASB 2009-11 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 and AASB 2010-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 9 (December 2010) AASB 10 Consolidated Financial Statements AASB 11 Joint Arrangements AASB 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement and AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 13 AASB 119 Employee Benefits (2011) and AASB 2011-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from AASB 119 (2011) AASB 2011-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards to Remove Individual Key Management Personnel Disclosure Requirements AASB 2011-7 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the Consolidation and Joint Arrangements Standards

July 1, 2013

June 30, 2014

July 1, 2015 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013 July 1, 2013

June 30, 2016 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2014

The Directors anticipate that the above amendments and interpretations will not have a material impact on the financial report of the Group in the year or period of initial application.

4.

CritiCal aCCounting estimates anD assumptions

In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, management has made certain estimates and assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities, income and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Management has not made any significant judgements apart from those involving estimations (as discussed further). The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of uncertainty in respect of estimates at the reporting date that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial reporting period are as listed below.

4.1

Reserve estimates and mine life

Reserves are estimates of the amount of product that can be economically and legally extracted from the Group’s mining tenements. In order to calculate reserves, estimates and assumptions are required to be formulated about a range of geological, technical and economic factors including quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, transportation costs, refining costs, commodity demand, commodity prices and exchange rates. Estimating the quantity and/or grade of reserves requires the size, shape and depth of the ore bodies or field to be determined by analysing geological data such as drilling samples. This process may require complex and difficult geological judgement and calculation to interpret the data. As the economic assumptions used to estimate reserves change from period to period, and because additional geological data is generated during the course of operations, estimates of reserves may change from period to period. Changes in reported reserves may affect the Group’s financial results and financial position in a number of ways, including: • asset carrying values may be affected due to changes in the estimated future cash flows; and • depreciation and amortisation charges in the statement of comprehensive income may change as result of the change in the useful economic lives of assets.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

77

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

4.2

Income taxes

The Group is subject to income taxes in multiple jurisdictions which require significant judgement to be exercised in determining the Group’s provision for income taxes. There are a number of transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain during the ordinary course of business. Current tax liabilities and assets are recognised at the amount expected to be paid to or recovered from the taxation authorities.

4.3

Realisation of deferred tax assets

The Group assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets with reference to estimates of future taxable income. To the extent that actual taxable income differs from management’s estimate of future taxable income, the value of recognised deferred tax assets may be affected. Deferred tax assets have been recognised to offset deferred tax liabilities to the extent that the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realised in the same jurisdiction and reporting period. Deferred tax assets have also been recognised based on management’s best estimate of the recoverability of these assets against future taxable income. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the same jurisdiction are off-set in the statement of financial position only to the extent that there is a legally enforceable right to off-set current tax assets and current tax liabilities and the deferred balances relate to taxes levied by the same taxing authority and are expected either to be settled on a net basis or realised simultaneously.

4.4

Impairment of assets

Assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

4.5

Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure

The Group’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure results in certain items of expenditure being capitalised for an area of interest where it is considered likely to be recoverable by future exploitation or sale or where the activities have not reached a stage which permits a reasonable assessment of the existence of reserves. This policy requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions as to future events and circumstances, in particular whether an economically viable extraction operation can be established. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after having capitalised the expenditure under the policy, a judgement is made that recovery of the expenditure is unlikely, the relevant capitalised amount will be written off to the statement of comprehensive income. Development activities commence after project sanctioning by the appropriate level of management and the Board. Judgement is applied by management in determining when a project is economically viable. In exercising this judgement, management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions similar to those described above for capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes available. If, after having commenced the development activity, a judgement is made that a development asset is impaired, the appropriate amount will be written off to the statement of comprehensive income.

4.6

Restoration and rehabilitation expenditure

The Group’s accounting policy for its restoration and rehabilitation closure provisions requires significant estimates and assumptions such as: requirements of the relevant legal and regulatory framework; the magnitude of possible contamination; and the timing, extent and costs of required closure and rehabilitation activity. These uncertainties may result in future actual expenditure differing from the amounts currently provided. The provision recognised is periodically reviewed and updated based on the facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes to the estimated future costs for operating sites are recognised in the statement of financial position by adjusting both the closure and rehabilitation asset and the provision.

5.

Determination of fair values

A number of the Group’s accounting policies and associated disclosures require the determination of fair values for both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. Where applicable, further information regarding the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that asset or liability.

5.1

Trade and other receivables

The fair value of trade and other receivables is estimated as the present value of future cash flows, discounted at the market rate of interest at the reporting date. Given the short-term nature of trade receivables the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.

5.2

Investments in equity securities

The fair value of investments in listed equity securities is determined by reference to their quoted bid price at the reporting date.

78

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

5.3

Derivatives

The fair value of forward exchange contracts is based on their listed market price, if available. If a listed market price is not available, then fair value is estimated by discounting the difference between the contractual forward price and the current forward price for the residual maturity of the contract using a risk-free interest rate (based on government bonds). The fair value of interest rate swaps is based on broker quotes. These quotes are tested for reasonableness by discounting estimated future cash flows based on the terms and maturity of each contract using market interest rates for a similar instrument at the measurement date. The fair value of commodity and other price derivatives is based on a valuation model. The valuation model (which includes where relevant the consideration of credit risk) discounts the estimated future cash flows based on the terms and maturity of each contract using forward curves and market interest rates at the reporting date.

5.4

Non-derivative financial liabilities

The fair value of non-derivative financial liabilities, which is determined for disclosure purposes, is calculated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at the current market interest rates that are available for similar financial instruments.

6.

segment reporting

AASB 8 Operating Segments (“AASB 8”) requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports about components of the Group that are regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Makers (“CODM”) in order to allocate resources to the segment and to assess its performance. The Group’s CODM are the Board of Directors of the Company, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer of the Group. Information reported to the Group’s CODM for the purposes of resource allocation and assessment of performance currently focuses on the operation, further construction and development of the Group’s integrated rare earth extraction and process facilities. The Group has only one reportable segment under AASB 8 being its Rare Earth Operations. The CODM do not review the business activities of the Group based on geography. The accounting policies applied by each segment are the same as the Group’s accounting policies. Results from operating activities represent the profit earned by each segment without allocation of interest income and expense and income tax benefit (expense). The CODM assess the performance of the operating segments based on adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net profit before income tax expense, net of financial expenses, depreciation and amortisation and adjusted to exclude certain significant items, including but not limited to such items as employee remuneration settled through share-based payments, restructuring costs, unrealised gains or losses on derivatives, gains or losses on the sale of non-strategic assets, asset impairments and write downs. for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 total rare earth Corporate/ Continuing note operations unalloCateD operations for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 total rare earth Corporate/ Continuing operations unalloCateD operations

in a$’000

business segment reporting Revenue Cost of sales gross profit Expenses and other income earnings before interest and tax (“ebit”) Financial income Financial expenses profit (loss) before income tax Income tax benefit (expense) profit (loss) for the year EBIT Depreciation and amortisation earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (“ebitDa”) 17 (117,479) 16,226 (10,932) 341 950 (950) – (117,479) (117,479) – – – (10,932) (10,932) 950 (950) – (128,411) (128,411) 4,767 (17,370) (141,014) (2,541) (143,555) (128,411) 16,567 (87,886) 1,317 (2,166) 32 – – – (87,886) (87,886) – – – (2,166) (2,166) – – – (90,052) (90,052) 2,840 (10,667) (97,879) 10,109 (87,770) (90,052) 1,349

(101,253)

(10,591)

(111,844)

(86,569)

(2,134)

(88,703)

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

79

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 total rare earth Corporate/ Continuing note operations unalloCateD operations for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 total rare earth Corporate/ Continuing operations unalloCateD operations

in a$’000

earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (“ebitDa”) Included in EBITDA: Impairment charge – property plant and equipment & other Impairment charge – deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Impairment charge – inventory Receipt of government grants Non-cash employee remuneration settled through share based payments comprising: Share based payments expense for the period Impact of options and performance rights forfeited during the period adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (“adjusted ebitDa”)

(101,253)

(10,591)

(111,844)

(86,569)

(2,134)

(88,703)

9

3,179

771

3,950

4,770

–

4,770

9 9 7

– 9,132 –

– – (9,795)

– 9,132 (9,795)

2,613 8,545 –

– – –

2,613 8,545 –

30 30

– –

6,627 (5,492)

6,627 (5,492)

– –

9,431 –

9,431 –

(88,942)

(18,480)

(107,422)

(70,641)

7,297

(63,344)

7.

other inCome for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 2012

in a$’000

Government grants total other income

9,795 9,795

– –

In January 2013 the Company received a cash payment of $15.2 million from the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) for eligible research and development (R&D) expenditure principally incurred in connection with the testing and commissioning of the Mt Weld concentration and processing plant. The eligible R&D expenditure was incurred in the prior year and was partly recognised through the profit or loss component of the statement of comprehensive income and partly capitalised to inventory. During the year ended June 30, 2013 $9.8 million of this amount has been recognised in the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income to match the treatment of the underlying R&D expenditure. The remaining amount of $5.4 million has been deferred for future recognition to reflect the progressive utilisation of the Group’s concentrate inventory to which certain of these costs were capitalised.

80

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

8.

personnel expenses for the year enDeD June 30,

The following items of expenditure are included in general and administration expenses:

in a$’000

2013

2012

Wages and salaries Superannuation and pension contributions Employee remuneration settled through share-based payments Termination costs Other total personnel expenses

37,006 1,396 1,135 1,100 1,599 42,236

26,254 1,327 9,431 256 791 38,059

9.

other expenses for the year enDeD June 30, note 2013 2012

in a$’000

Impairment loss – inventory Impairment loss – property, plant and equipment Impairment loss – deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Impairment loss – other total other expenses

17 20 21

9,132 3,361 – 589 13,082

8,545 4,770 2,613 – 15,928

10. auDitors remuneration
The following items of expenditure are included in general and administration expenses: for the year enDeD June 30, in $a 2013 2012

Auditor’s remuneration to Ernst & Young (Australia), comprising: Audit fees Tax fees(1) Other fees total auditor’s remuneration ernst & young (australia) Auditor’s remuneration to Ernst & Young (other locations), comprising: Audit fees total auditor’s remuneration ernst & young (other locations) 33,297 33,297 25,286 25,286 321,764 384,064 125,041 830,869 209,850 25,600 11,300 246,750

(1) Tax services represent work undertaken for the preparation of the Australian tax-consolidated group’s research and development expenditure return which resulted in the Company receiving a cash payment of $15.2 million from the ATO (refer to note 7).

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

81

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

11. finanCial inCome anD expenses for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Interest income on cash and cash equivalents* financial income Interest expense on financial liabilities measured at amortised cost* Mt Kellett convertible bonds Amortisation of deferred transaction costs – Mt Kellett convertible bonds Amortisation of Mt Kellett equity conversion option Financing transaction costs and fees Net foreign currency exchange loss financial expenses net financial income (expense)
*

4,767 4,767

2,840 2,840

(5,614) (113) (8,439) (1,694) (1,510) (17,370) (12,603)

(974) (35) (2,881) (4,526) (2,251) (10,667) (7,827)

Interest income (expense) are shown net of amounts capitalised in respect of qualifying assets; refer to note 20 for more information.

12. inCome taxes for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Current tax Current tax expense in respect of the current year Adjustments recognised in the current year in relation to the current tax in prior years Deferred tax Deferred tax (benefit) expense recognised in the year total income tax (benefit) expense relating to the continuing operations 2,488 2,541 (10,097) (10,109) 53 – 53 371 (383) (12)

12.1

Income tax recognised in profit (loss) for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 2012

in a$’000

Profit (loss) before tax for continuing operations Income tax (benefit) expense calculated at 30% (2012: 30%) Add (deduct): R&D tax offset not included in assessable income Effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable profit Effect of foreign exchange gains and losses Effect of unused tax losses not recognised as deferred tax assets Effect of temporary differences not recognised as deferred tax assets Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in other jurisdictions Foreign tax paid on profits attributable to foreign permanent establishments Effect of (under) over provision in prior years Other adjustments total current year income tax (benefit) expense

(141,014) (42,304) (2,939) 21,502 (16,420) 37,839 5,256 – 58 – (451) 2,541

(97,879) (29,364) – 11,644 (5,376) 13,243 – (57) 87 (383) 97 (10,109)

82

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

12.2 Income tax recognised directly in equity for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Deferred tax Initial recognition of the equity component of Mt Kellett convertible bonds Share issue costs total income tax (benefit) expense recognised directly in equity – 1,502 1,502 (12,193) – (12,193)

12.3 Income tax recognised directly in other comprehensive income for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Deferred tax Available for sale – financial assets Revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities through foreign currency translation reserve total income tax (benefit) expense recognised directly in other comprehensive income 371 615 986 2,096 – 2,096

13. DeferreD tax assets anD liabilities
13.1 Deferred tax balances balanCe at July 1, 2012 reCogniseD in profit or loss reCogniseD in equity reCogniseD in oCi balanCe at June 30, 2013

in a$’000

temporary differences Inventory Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Property plant and equipment Available for sale – financial assets Borrowings Share-based payments Costs of equity and debt raisings Other unused tax losses and credits Tax losses 4,690 – 17,658 (2,488) – 1,502 – 986 22,348 – – 1,346 430 (371) (5,462) (2,820) 1,779 408 (4,690) (5,927) (3,156) (22,994) 215 11,168 1,927 (885) (494) (20,146) – – – – – – 1,502 – 1,502 – – – 371 – – – 615 986 (5,927) (1,810) (22,564) 215 5,706 (893) 2,396 529 (22,348)

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

83

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

in a$’000

balanCe at July 1, 2011

reCogniseD in profit or loss

reCogniseD in equity

reCogniseD in oCi

balanCe at June 30, 2012

temporary differences Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Property plant and equipment Available for sale – financial assets Borrowings Share-based payments Costs of equity and debt raisings Other unused tax losses and credits Tax losses

– – (2,365) – – 2,365 – – – –

1,346 430 (102) 6,768 (2,820) (623) 408 5,407 4,690 10,097

– – – (12,230) – 37 – (12,193) – (12,193)

– – 2,096 – – – – 2,096 – 2,096

1,346 430 (371) (5,462) (2,820) 1,779 408 (4,690) 4,690 –

13.2 Unrecognised deferred tax assets as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses for which no deferred tax assets have been recognised are attributable to the following: Tax losses – revenue in nature Tax losses – capital in nature Deductible temporary differences 236,678 2,330 17,519 256,527 125,808 2,330 – 128,138

The Group’s unused tax losses of a revenue nature for which no deferred tax assets have been recognised relate to Australia (2013: $178.2 million, 2012: $125.8 million), Malaysia (2013: $56.5 million, 2012: Nil) and Malawi (2013: $1.9 million, 2012: Nil). At June 30, 2013 it was not probable that the Group would have future taxable profits in these jurisdictions against which these tax losses can be utilised. The potential tax benefit of these tax losses to the Group is $68.2 million (2012: $37.7 million). The Group’s unused tax losses of a capital nature and deductible temporary differences of $2.3 million (2012: $2.3 million) and $17.5 million (2012: Nil), respectively, for which no deferred tax assets have been recognised relate to Australia. At June 30, 2013 it was not probable that the Group would have future taxable profits in Australia against which these tax losses and deductible temporary differences can be utilised. The potential tax benefit of these tax losses and temporary differences to the Group is $6.0 million (2012: $0.7 million).

14. other Comprehensive inCome
Within the statement of comprehensive income the Group has disclosed certain items of other comprehensive income net of the associated income tax expense or benefit. The pre-tax amount of each of these items and the associated tax effect is as follows: for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

pre-tax Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Available for sale financial assets total other comprehensive income 36,400 (1,236) 35,164

tax effect 615 371 986

total 37,015 (865) 36,150

pre-tax (10,191) (6,647) (16,838)

tax effect – 1,994 1,994

total (10,191) (4,653) (14,844)

84

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

15. Cash anD Cash equivalents as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Cash at bank and on hand Short-term deposits Restricted cash total cash and cash equivalents

17,665 108,000 15,706 141,371

26,040 98,337 81,061 205,438

Restricted cash represents funds provided under the Sojitz loan facility (refer to note 23) which is principally available to fund the capital expenditure associated with the Phase 2 expansion of the Concentration Plant at Mount Weld and the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (“LAMP”) in Malaysia ($10.3 million). The residual restricted funds are available to fund future interest payments under the Sojitz facility ($5.4 million).

16. traDe anD other reCeivables as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Trade receivables total current trade and other receivables

1,765 1,765

932 932

17. inventories as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Raw materials and consumables Work in progress Finished goods total inventories Current inventories Non-current inventories

42,235 50,167 533 92,935 78,380 14,555

41,823 23,868 – 65,691 52,419 13,272

During the year ended June 30, 2013 the Group recognised write-downs on inventories held to their net realisable value totalling $9.1 million for externally acquired raw materials ($5.1 million), work in progress ($3.8 million) and finished goods ($0.2 million). The write down was recognised as a component of other expenses in the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income (refer to note 9). In the year ended 30 June 2012 the write down of $8.5 million related to externally acquired raw materials for the Malaysian operations.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

85

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

The Group recognised depreciation on its property, plant and equipment and amortisation on its deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure and intangible assets for the years ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 respectively in the following categories: reCogniseD in general anD aDministration expense reCogniseD in inventory in a$’000 2013 2012 2013 2012 total 2013 2012

Property, plant and equipment Deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure Intangibles total

15,797 530 140 16,467

965 260 124 1,349

2,838 – – 2,838

6,135 183 26 6,344

18,635 530 140 19,305

7,100 443 150 7,693

On the sale of inventory to customers, the component of the depreciation or amortisation expense capitalised within inventory is reflected in the cost of goods sold in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss. This was $0.1 million in the year ended June 30, 2013 (June 30, 2012: nil). During the year ended June 30, 2013 the Group recognised royalties payable to the Western Australian Government totalling $0.6 million (year ended June 30, 2012: $nil). Royalties arise on the shipment of the Group’s concentrate from Australia to Malaysia.

18. available for sale – finanCial assets as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

listed equity securities - at cost - impact of marked-to-market movement (gross of tax) 2,518 (716) 1,802 2,518 1,236 3,754

The fair value of the available for sale asset is derived from quoted market selling prices. Refer to note 27.6 for further information.

19. other non-Current assets as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Security deposits – Local banking facilities, Malaysia Security deposits – Local banking facilities and Mining Tenements, Australia Security deposits – AELB, Malaysia

9,836 4,271 3,289 17,396

8,058 4,980 – 13,038

Local banking facilities relate both to cash provided for security bonds issued to secure the mining tenements at Mount Weld and a restricted deposit pledged as collateral for bank facilities in Australia and Malaysia. The weighted average annual interest rate in Australia was 5.84% (2012: 4.48%) and the weighted average annual interest rate in Malaysia was 3% (2012: 3%). During the year the Group transferred in total $3.3 million to the Malaysian Government’s Atomic Energy Licencing Board (“AELB”). These payments form a component of a total US$50 million of instalments due in accordance with the conditions underlying the granting of the TOL to the Group for the LAMP in Malaysia. Please refer to note 32 for the residual commitment to the AELB.

86

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

20. property, plant anD equipment builDings leaseholD plant anD lanD equipment fixtures anD fittings assets unDer leaseholD motor ConstruCimprovevehiCles tion ments

in a$’000

total

as at June 30, 2013 Cost Accumulated impairment losses Accumulated depreciation Carrying amount as at June 30, 2012 Cost Accumulated impairment losses Accumulated depreciation Carrying amount Cost at the beginning of the year Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at the beginning of the year Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Additions Capitalisation of borrowing costs Depreciation for the year (note 17) Impairment loss for the year Transfers of assets under construction Transfers from (to) inventory Change in rehabilitation obligations (note 25) Effect of movements in exchange rates Carrying amount at June 30, 2013 Cost at the beginning of the year Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at the beginning of the year Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Additions Capitalisation of borrowing costs Depreciation for the year (note 17) Impairment loss for the year Transfers Effect of movements in exchange rates Carrying amount at June 30, 2012 26,962 – (1,105) 25,857 26,962 (1,105) 25,857 – – (279) – – – 16,263 3,207 45,048 27,169 (839) 26,330 – – (277) – – (196) 25,857 88,060 (845) (6,036) 81,179 88,060 (6,881) 81,179 2,594 – (16,895) (1,195) 450,244 409 – 50,255 566,591 1,429 (96) 1,333 2,350 – (5,935) (845) 84,262 14 81,179 5,956 (28) (2,187) 3,741 5,956 (2,215) 3,741 1,503 – (975) – 1,086 – – 85 5,440 2,900 (1,478) 1,422 626 – (755) (28) 2,417 59 3,741 968 (161) (202) 605 968 (363) 605 49 – (102) (53) – – – 190 689 818 (92) 726 146 – (111) (161) – 5 605 598,900 (3,736) – 595,164 598,900 (3,736) 595,164 96,221 13,946 – (2,113) (468,590) (9,665) – 18,515 243,478 331,180 – 331,180 355,404 7,051 – (3,736) (86,679) (8,056) 595,164 249 – (192) 57 249 (192) 57 27 52 (384) – 17,260 – – 2,077 19,089 249 (170) 79 – – (22) – – – 57 721,095 (4,770) (9,722) 706,603 721,095 (14,492) 706,603 100,394 13,998 (18,635) (3,361) – (9,256) 16,263 74,329 880,335 363,745 (2,675) 361,070 358,526 7,051 (7,100) (4,770) – (8,174) 706,603 46,597 – (1,549) 45,048 592,325 (1,907) (23,827) 566,591 8,628 (25) (3,163) 5,440 1,197 (196) (312) 689 249,791 (6,313) – 243,478 19,696 – (607) 19,089 918,234 (8,441) (29,458) 880,335

On January 7, 2013 the Group announced the successful commissioning of the cracking and leaching Rare Earths extraction units of Phase 1 of the LAMP in Malaysia. During June 2013, the Group announced that the expansion of the concentration plant at Mount Weld (Phase 2) was completed and that the plant had produced at capacity. With these activities complete, assets under construction that related to Phase 1 of the LAMP and Phase 2 of the Mount Weld concentration plant were transferred to the appropriate asset category. Depreciation during the year ended June 30, 2013 commenced for Phase 1 of the Malaysian operations from January 2013 and from 30 June 2013 for Phase 2 of the Mount Weld concentration plant. The transfer to inventory of $9.7 million relates to items categorised as spares paid for as a component of the LAMP’s Phase 1 construction. The remaining balance of assets under construction relates predominately to Phase 2 of the LAMP.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

87

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

During the year ended June 30, 2013 the Group recognised an asset and a provision for the future estimated cost of restoring and rehabilitating Phase 1 of the LAMP in Malaysia ($16.3 million). Refer to note 25 for further details. During the year ended June 30, 2013, the Group recognised an impairment loss of $3.4 million in relation to its property plant and equipment in Malaysia ($3.0 million) and the Mount Weld operations ($0.4 million) which resulted from the identification of certain assets being surplus or redundant to the current operational plan. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Group recognised an impairment loss of $1.3 million in relation to its property, plant and equipment in Malawi (resulting from the previously reported court proceeding that arose during the period) and a $3.5 million impairment loss in relation to property, plant and equipment at its Malaysian operation (which resulted from the identification of certain assets being surplus or redundant to the current operational plan). The impairment charges in both years were recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of other expenses in the profit or loss (2013: $3.4 million; 2012: $4.8 million) and reduced the carrying value of associated assets. Restrictions on the title of property plant and equipment are outlined in note 23.

21. DeferreD exploration, evaluation anD Development expenDiture exploration anD pre evaluation Development proDuCtion expenDiture expenDiture stripping rehabilitation asset

in a$’000

total

as at June 30, 2013 Cost Accumulated impairment losses Accumulated amortisation Carrying amount as at June 30, 2012 Cost Accumulated impairment losses Accumulated amortisation Carrying amount Cost at the beginning of the year Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at the beginning of the year Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Additions Amortisation for the year (note 17) Change in rehabilitation obligations Carrying amount at June 30, 2013 Cost at the beginning of the year Accumulated amortisation and impairment losses at the beginning of the year Carrying amount at the beginning of the year Additions Amortisation for the year (note 17) Impairment loss for the year Carrying amount at June 30, 2012 20,540 (14,220) (809) 5,511 20,540 (15,029) 5,511 91 (188) – 5,414 20,430 (11,974) 8,456 111 (443) (2,613) 5,511 16,617 (3,641) – 12,976 16,617 (3,641) 12,976 926 (278) – 13,624 16,617 (3,641) 12,976 – – – 12,976 4,078 – – 4,078 4,078 – 4,078 – (64) – 4,014 4,078 – 4,078 – – – 4,078 3,777 – – 3,777 3,777 – 3,777 – – 20,825 24,602 3,777 – 3,777 – – – 3,777 45,012 (17,861) (809) 26,342 45,012 (18,670) 26,342 1,017 (530) 20,825 47,654 44,902 (15,615) 29,287 111 (443) (2,613) 26,342 20,944 (14,483) (1,047) 5,414 17,543 (3,641) (278) 13,624 4,078 – (64) 4,014 24,602 – – 24,602 67,167 (18,124) (1,389) 47,654

88

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

During the year the Group recognised an increase to the future estimated rehabilitation asset and provision for the restoration and rehabilitation of the Mount Weld mining operations and concentration plant. Refer to note 25 for further details. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Group recognised an impairment loss of $2.6 million in relation to its exploration and evaluation expenditure in Malawi (resulting from the previously reported court proceeding that arose during the period). These charges were recognised in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of other expenses in the profit or loss and reduced the carrying value of these assets to nil. No changes for impairment were made in the year ended June 30, 2013. Restrictions on the title of the deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure are outlined in note 23.

22. traDe anD other payables as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Trade payables Accrued expenses Other payables total trade and other payables Current Non-current

9,393 19,622 5,282 34,297 33,515 782

21,521 23,170 3,640 48,331 46,369 1,962

Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 day terms. Trade and other payables include amounts in relation to Phase 1 of the Rare Earth Project (2013: $3.7 million; 2012: $29.1 million) and Phase 2 of the Rare Earth Project (2013: $13.2 million; 2012: $11.4 million).

23. borrowings
This note provides information about the contractual terms of the Group’s interest bearing loans and borrowings. For more information about the Group’s exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk, see note 27. as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Current borrowings Sojitz loan facility non-current borrowings Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds Sojitz loan facility Unamortised transaction costs Carrying amount Principal value of Mt Kellett convertible bonds (1) Unamortised equity component Unamortised transaction costs total financial liability carrying amount 235,410 211,658 447,068 246,359 – 246,359 246,359 (34,353) (348) 211,658 221,479 181,583 403,062 221,479 – 221,479 221,479 (39,434) (462) 181,583 10,949 –

(1) The principal balance reflects the full value of the Mt Kellett convertible bond. On initial recognition, part of this value is recognised as a component of equity.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

89

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Sojitz facility
The Sojitz loan facility for US$225 million was received from a Special Purpose Company (“SPC”) established by Sojitz Corporation and Japan, Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (“JOGMEC”). The proceeds of the Sojitz loan facility are only available to fund capital expenditure required for Phase 2 of the Rare Earths Project, enabling the Company to increase planned production capacity of Rare Earth Oxide (“REO”) to 22,000 tonnes per annum from the expected Phase 1 production capacity of 11,000 tonnes per annum. The Sojitz loan facility is secured over all of the assets of the Group, other than the Malawi assets. Most of the Sojitz fixed securities are released upon the Group achieving “Completion of Phase 1”, which, under the original terms of the facility, occurred once there has been an average level of production over three consecutive months of not less than 70% of the nameplate capacity of Phase 1 of the LAMP and a cash operating margin test is met. After the Group achieves Completion of Phase 1, the securities retained by Sojitz comprise a floating featherweight charge over the assets of the Company, charges over some bank accounts related to the Sojitz loan facility and a charge over receivables from Japanese customers. Interest on the principal accrues daily on the basis of the actual number of days based on a 360 day year and is payable semiannually. The rate of interest for each interest period is the LIBOR published semi annual rate plus a margin of 2.75%. There is also a requirement to pay withholding tax on this interest. Under the original terms of the facility, the principal was repayable in five equal instalments with the first principal repayment scheduled on March 31, 2015, and the last principal repayment scheduled on March 31, 2017. The principal can be prepaid in whole or in part at any time by giving 10 business days’ prior written notice to Sojitz. If the prepayment is made on a day other than the last day of a semi annual interest period, a break fee may be payable by the Company. The Sojitz loan facility agreement contains a number of financial covenants including, for example, covenants relating to the Group’s debt service cover ratio (both forward-looking and backward-looking), loan life coverage ratio and gross debt to equity ratio. The Company is required to report on compliance with these covenants on a semi annual basis. A failure to comply with a covenant will constitute a “Review Event”, which imposes certain restrictions on the Company. In addition, during the period in which a Review Event subsists, the rate of interest payable by Lynas in respect of the loan facility increases to the LIBOR published semi annual rate plus a margin of 5.25%. Given the delay in the receipt of the TOL in 2012, the Group entered into an Amendment Deed (the “Deed”) with respect to the Sojitz loan facility on September 25, 2012. Under the terms of the Deed and as a result of the delays in first production at the LAMP, the parties agreed to postpone the measurement of certain financial covenant tests until nine months after Completion of Phase 1 (as defined under the Sojitz loan facility). As a result of entering into the Deed, the Group agreed that certain restrictions will apply until nine months after Completion of Phase 1. Those temporary restrictions relate to capital and dividend returns to shareholders, limitations on the incurrence of new indebtedness (capped at US$80 million) and a temporary higher interest rate of LIBOR published semi annual rate plus a margin of 5.25%. The Sojitz loan facility agreement also contains customary covenants which restrict the Group from creating, or permitting to exist, any security over its assets or disposing of any of its assets (other than defined “Permitted Encumbrances” and “Permitted Disposals”). Subject to the above paragraph, unless a Review Event has occurred, the Company may incur an additional financial liability provided that such liability is unsecured and is either subordinated to, or ranks pari passu with, the Sojitz loan. The Sojitz loan facility agreement also contains customary events of default, including the “Completion of Phase 2” test which, under the original terms of the facility, required the Group to meet certain production volumes and cash operating margins over a three month period, by no later than the original Project Sunset Date of January 19, 2014. Arising from subdued global rare earths demand and previous delays to the start up of the LAMP, the production and financial profile of Lynas will be different to that envisaged at the time of the Sojitz loan facility’s establishment. Consequently, the Group entered into a deed of amendment on September 13, 2013 under which the terms and conditions of the Sojitz loan facility are restructured to better suit the new profile. Pursuant to the deed of amendment, the parties agreed to amend the Sojitz loan facility as follows: (1) Defer until March 31, 2015 the date by which the Group is required to either (a) meet certain production volume and cash operating margins under the Completion of Phase 2 test (as described above) or (b) make an additional principal repayment of US$35 million (giving a total principal repayment of at least US$125 million by March 31, 2015); Completion of Phase 1 (as described above) for the purpose of the release of most of the Sojitz fixed securities will occur once the necessary average production and cash operating margin is achieved over a period of six consecutive months (previously three consecutive months);

(2)

90

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(3)

Amend the repayment schedule as follows: repayment Date: January 19, 2014 September 30, 2014 March 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 March 31, 2016 instalment US$10 million US$35 million US$45 million US$45 million US$90 million

The previous repayment schedule was 5 equal six monthly instalments of US$45 million from March 31, 2015 to March 31, 2017. (4) That each time that the Group conducts a debt raising (subject to an exception for a basket of “Permitted Financial Liabilities” up to US$80 million), 50% of the amount raised must be used for a partial prepayment (without penalty or break costs) of the Sojitz loan facility. This obligation ceases to apply once a total principal amount of US$125 million is repaid.

Any prepayments in addition to those specified under paragraph 3 and including those under paragraph 1(b) above are to be applied in reverse order to the repayment schedule (i.e. applied in the first instance to the March 2016 payment). The obligations of the Company under the Sojitz loan facility are guaranteed by the Group’s subsidiaries other than Lynas Africa Holdings Pty Ltd and Lynas Africa Limited (“the Guarantors”). Any wholly-owned subsidiary that becomes a member of the Group is required to accede to the loan agreement.

Mt Kellett convertible bonds
On January 24, 2012, the Company executed binding documentation for a US$225 million unsecured convertible bonds issue (the “Convertible Bonds”) with Mt Kellett Capital Management (“Mt Kellett”), a US-based investment firm. Initially funding for the Convertible Bonds was received on January 25, 2012 (US$50 million) with the final payment of US$175 million being received on February 28, 2012. None of the Convertible Bonds had been converted into shares as at the end of the financial year. The proceeds from the Convertible Bond issue have been used to fund construction and commissioning of Phase 1 of the LAMP in Malaysia and for operational expenses. Interest accrues daily on the basis of the actual number of days based on a 365-day year and is payable quarterly. The rate of interest is 2.75% per annum. Each bond entitles the holder to convert to one share at an initial conversion price of A$1.25 per share (at a set US$ to A$ exchange rate). Conversion may occur at any time between July 25, 2012 and July 25, 2016. The conversion price may be adjusted as a result of certain equity related transactions such as the issue of shares, payment of dividends, rights issues or redemptions. Following the ISP and SPP placement in November and December 2012 (refer to note 26), the conversion price was adjusted to A$1.15 per share. A bondholder may, at any time following the occurrence of a defined “Redemption Event”, require the Company to redeem some or all of the Convertible Bonds held by the bondholder. The Redemption Events include, for example, an insolvency event occurring in relation to a Group Company, a Group Company ceasing (or threatening to cease) to carry on all or part of its business which is likely to be materially adverse to the Group as a whole, a cross default by the Group in relation to certain other financial indebtedness (including the Sojitz loan facility), and a change in control of any member of the Group. If, at any time during the period between July 25, 2015 and July 25, 2016, the 30-day VWAP of the shares is equal to or exceeds 160% of the conversion price, the Company may give notice of its intention to redeem all of the Convertible Bonds on issue by delivering a redemption notice to bondholders. The Convertible Bonds are unsecured. The Mt Kellett Convertible Bond subscription documents contain customary covenants which restrict the Group from incurring any financial liabilities or creating any security interests which in each case would rank senior to or pari passu with the Convertible Bonds, subject to specified exceptions which include the Sojitz loan facility. Those restrictions are released upon the Group achieving “Completion of Phase 1”, which occurs once there has been an average level of production over six consecutive months of not less than 70% of the nameplate capacity of Phase 1 of the LAMP. After the Group achieves Completion of Phase 1, the obligations of the Company and the Guarantors in respect of the Convertible Bonds must at all times rank at least pari passu with all other present and future unsecured financial liabilities (other than the Sojitz loan facility). On July 25, 2016, the Company must redeem all Convertible Bonds held by bondholders that have not otherwise been redeemed or converted by paying the relevant redemption amount to each bondholder. The net proceeds received from the issue of the convertible bonds have been split between the financial liability element and an equity component, representing the residual attributable to the option to convert the financial liability into equity of the Company, as shown above.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

91

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Terms and debt repayment schedule as at June 30, 2013 nominal interest rate year of maturity faCe value (usD ‘000) Carrying amount (auD ‘000) as at June 30, 2012 faCe value (usD ‘000) Carrying amount (auD ‘000)

CurrenCy

Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds*

USD USD

LIBOR + 2.75% +2.50% from 25 September 2012 2.75%

2016 2016

225,000 225,000 450,000

246,359 211,658 458,017

225,000 225,000 450,000

221,479 181,583 403,062

*

The carrying amount of the Mt Kellet note reflects the current value of the debt component of the instrument.

Nominal interest rates average for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 base rate margin total rate average for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 base rate margin total rate

Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds

0.61% 2.75%

4.62% –

5.86% 2.75%

0.57% 2.75%

2.75% –

3.32% 2.75%

24. employee benefits as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Provision for annual leave Provision for long service leave Other total employee benefits Current Non-current

1,611 375 1,871 3,857 3,650 207

1,382 430 – 1,812 1,382 430

25. provisions in a$’000 restoration anD rehabilitation onerous ContraCts total

Balance at the beginning of the year Provisions made during the year Provision utilised during the year Effect of discounting balance at June 30, 2013 Current Non-current total provisions at June 30, 2013 Current Non-current total provisions at June 30, 2012

3,777 37,088 – – 40,865 – 40,865 40,865 – 3,777 3,777

3,061 20,694 (7,235) – 16,520 16,520 – 16,520 3,061 – 3,061

6,838 57,782 (7,235) – 57,385 16,520 40,865 57,385 3,061 3,777 6,838

92

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Restoration and Rehabilitation
The activities of the Group give rise to obligations for asset and site restoration and rehabilitation at the LAMP in Malaysia and the Mount Weld concentration plant. The key areas of uncertainty in estimating the provisions for these obligations are set out in note 4.6. An initial provision of $16.3 million was made during 2013 in respect of the Group’s future costs to decommission, restore and rehabilitate the LAMP in Malaysia. These costs arise from the ongoing construction and operation of Phase 1 of the LAMP. The provision was recognised following the successful commissioning of the Phase 1 operations at the LAMP during June 2013. Upon cessation of operations, the site including the processing assets, ancillary facilities, utilities and the onsite storage facility will be decommissioned and any materials removed from the location. The Group has used third party specialists to assist in estimating these costs and will review these estimates periodically over time as the operations continue to develop. The provision for the restoration and rehabilitation of the Mount Weld mining operations and concentration plant site increased from $3.8 million at June 30, 2012 to $24.6 million at June 30, 2013 following a reassessment of the future costs to decommission and restore the site to pastoral use. These costs arise from the operation of the mining and concentration processing facilities at Mt Weld and take into account the areas of disturbance at the balance date and the actions required upon cessation of operations to decommission and remove the processing plant from the location. The Group has used current guidance as provided by the Department of Minerals and Petroleum in Western Australia along with internal specialists with the relevant industry experience to develop and revise these cost estimates. These estimates will be periodically reviewed over time as the operations continue to develop. For both the provision at the LAMP and the Mount Weld concentration plant, a corresponding increase in either property plant and equipment or deferred exploration and evaluation expenditure assets respectively has been recognised on the Group’s balance sheet. Reference should be made to notes 20 and 21 respectively for details on the corresponding assets at the LAMP and Mount Weld. The unwinding of the effect of discounting of the provision is recognised as a finance cost.

Onerous contracts
The provision for onerous contracts represents the expected value of obligations arising under ‘take or pay’ clauses of non-cancellable supply agreements that the Group is currently contracted to. The provision at June 30, 2013 represents management’s current forecasted estimate of the value of materials that the Group will be unable to take under these contracts over the life of the agreement as well as the value of materials not delivered under the agreement through to June 30, 2013.

26. equity anD reserves
26.1 Share capital as at June 30, 2013 number of shares ‘000 2012 number of shares ‘000

a$’000

a$’000

Balance at the beginning of the year Issue of shares pursuant to Institutional Share Placement (“ISP”) Issue of shares pursuant to Share Purchase Plan (“SPP”) Issue of shares pursuant to option conversion Equity raising costs Deferred tax on equity raising costs balance at June 30

1,715,029 200,000 44,642 1,130 – – 1,960,801

823,161 150,000 25,000 226 (5,244) 1,502 994,645

1,713,647 – – 1,382 – – 1,715,029

821,994 – – 1,167 – – 823,161

All issued ordinary shares are fully paid and have no par value. The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends as declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per share. All shares rank equally with regard to the Group’s residual assets in the event of a wind-up. Further detail regarding the issue of shares on option conversion is provided in note 30.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

93

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

26.2 Reserves as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Equity settled employee benefits Foreign currency translation Investment revaluation Other balance at June 30

35,128 883 – 28,743 64,754

33,993 (36,132) 865 28,743 27,469

The equity settled employee benefits reserve relates to share options granted by the Group to its employees under the employee share option plan. Further information about share-based payments to employees is set out in note 30. Exchange differences relating to the translation of the results and net assets of the Group’s foreign operations from their functional currencies to the Group’s presentation currency are recognised directly in other comprehensive income and accumulated in the foreign currency translation reserve. The investment revaluation reserve represents the cumulative gains and losses arising on the revaluation of available for sale financial assets that have been recognised in other comprehensive income (see note 18). As at June 30, 2013, the cumulative revaluation losses of $0.9 million were transferred to the profit or loss component of the statement of comprehensive income. This was on the basis that the revaluation losses on the available for sale financial assets was considered to represent a significant and prolonged decline in value. The other reserve represents the equity component of the US$225 million unsecured Mt Kellett convertible bonds issued in the prior year, net of the associated deferred tax (see note 23).

26.3 Earnings (loss) per share
The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are as follows: as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Net loss attributed to ordinary shareholders (in A$’000) loss used in calculating basic and diluted loss per share (in a’$000) Number of shares (No‘000) Weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating basic loss per share: Diluted earnings per share: The number of options which are potential ordinary shares that are not dilutive and hence not used in the valuation of the diluted loss per share The number of convertible bonds which are potential ordinary shares that are not dilutive and hence not used in the valuation of the diluted earnings per share – assuming 100% conversion at the inception date of the bonds. adjusted weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculating diluted loss per share Basic loss per share (cents per share) Diluted loss per share (cents per share)

(143,555) (143,555) 1,861,087

(87,770) (87,770) 1,714,094

72,485 186,515 1,861,087 (7.71) (7.71)

83,029 171,594 1,714,094 (5.12) (5.12)

26.4 Capital management
The Directors are responsible for monitoring and managing the Group’s capital structure. The Directors’ policy is to maintain an acceptable capital base to promote the confidence of the Group’s financiers and creditors and to sustain the future development of the business. The Directors monitor the Group’s financial position to ensure that it complies at all times with its financial and other covenants as set out in its financing arrangements. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Directors may elect to take a number of measures including, for example, to dispose of assets or operating segments of the business, to alter its short to medium term plans in respect of capital projects and working capital levels, or to re-balance the level of equity and external debt in place. Capital comprises share capital, external debt and reserves.

94

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

27. finanCial risk management
27.1 Overview
This note presents information about the Group’s exposure to market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk, and, where applicable, the Group’s objectives, policies and procedures for managing these risks. Exposure to market, credit and liquidity risks arise in the normal course of the Group’s business. The Directors and management of the Group have overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Group’s risk management framework. The Directors have established a treasury policy that identifies risks faced by the Group and sets out policies and procedures to mitigate those risks. Monthly consolidated treasury reports are prepared for the Directors, who ensure compliance with the Group’s risk management policies and procedures.

27.2 Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices will affect the Group’s cash flows or the fair value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters.

(a)

Foreign exchange risk

As a result of the Group’s international operations, foreign exchange risk exposures exist on purchases, assets and borrowings that are denominated in foreign currencies (i.e. currencies other than the functional currency of each of the Group’s operating entities). The currencies in which these transactions are primarily denominated are the AUD, USD and the Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”). The Group takes advantage of natural offsets to the extent possible. Therefore, when commercially feasible, the Group borrows in the same currencies in which cash flows from operations are generated. Generally the Group does not use forward exchange contracts to hedge residual foreign exchange risk arising from receipts and payments denominated in foreign currencies. However, when considered appropriate the Group may enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign exchange risk arising from specific transactions. The Group’s primary exposure to foreign exchange risk is on the translation of net assets of Group entities which are denominated in currencies other than AUD, which is the Group’s presentation currency. The impact of movements in exchange rates is recognised primarily in the other comprehensive income component of the Group’s statement of comprehensive income. Certain subsidiaries within the Group are exposed to foreign exchange risk on purchases denominated in currencies that are not the functional currency of that subsidiary. In these circumstances, a change in exchange rates would impact the net operating profit recognised in the profit or loss component of the Group’s statement of comprehensive income. Effective from January 24, 2012, the functional currency of Lynas Corporation Limited (the Parent) changed from AUD to USD, following the issue of the US$225 million Mt Kellett convertible bonds. Exposure to foreign exchange risk The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk on financial assets and financial liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies (i.e. currencies other than the functional currency of each of the Group’s operating entities). The Group’s exposure on financial assets and liabilities by currency which have the potential of impacting the profit or loss component of the statement of comprehensive income is detailed below. in a$’000 auD usD total

June 30, 2013 Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Trade and other payables total exposure June 30, 2012 Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Trade and other payables total exposure 60,379 4,088 – 64,467 3,997 – (6,783) (2,786) 64,376 4,088 (6,783) 61,681 5,342 24 (42) 5,324 571 1,834 (13,680) (11,275) 5,913 1,858 (13,722) (5,951)

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

95

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

In addition, the Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk on the translation of its operations that are denominated in currencies other than AUD. The Group’s net assets denominated in currencies other than the AUD which have the potential of impacting the other comprehensive income component of the statement of comprehensive income are: in ’000 myr usD

June 30, 2013 Net asset exposure – local currency June 30, 2012 Net asset exposure – local currency 1,945,580 586,268 2,147,429 975,255

Significant exchange rates The following significant exchange rates applied to the translation of net assets of Group entities which are denominated in currencies other than AUD during the period: average rate for the year enDeD June 30, Closing rate as at June 30, 2013 2012 2013 2012

USD MYR

1.0212 3.1375

1.0367 3.1968

0.9133 2.8826

1.0159 3.2431

Sensitivity analysis A change in exchange rates would impact future payments and receipts on the Group’s financial assets and liabilities denominated in differing currencies to each respective member of the Group’s functional currency. A 10% strengthening or weakening of these currencies against the respective Group member’s functional currency, at the reporting date, would have increased (decreased) the reported profit or loss for the year by the amounts shown. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. The same basis has been applied for all periods presented. inCrease/(DeCrease) in profit after tax for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 10% strengthening 10% weakening inCrease/(DeCrease) in profit after tax for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 10% strengthening 10% weakening

in a$’000

USD AUD

(1,128) 532

1,128 (532)

(278) 6,447

278 (6,447)

A change in exchange rates would also impact the translation of net assets of Group operations whose functional currencies are denominated in currencies other than AUD, which is the Group’s presentation currency. A 10% strengthening or weakening of these currencies against the Group’s presentation currency, at the reporting date, would have increased (decreased) the reported net asset position with a corresponding change to the foreign currency translation reserve (‘FCTR’) for the year by the amounts shown. This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant. The same basis has been applied for all periods presented. inCrease/(DeCrease) in fCtr for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 10% strengthening 10% weakening inCrease/(DeCrease) in fCtr for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 10% strengthening 10% weakening

in a$’000

USD MYR

59,092 74,496

(59,092) (74,496)

31,825 59,992

(31,825) (59,992)

96

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

(b)

Interest rate risk

The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings at both fixed and floating rates and deposits which earn interest at floating rates. Borrowings and deposits at floating rates expose the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. Borrowings at fixed rates expose the Group to fair value interest rate risk. The Group’s primary exposure is to both floating and fixed interest rates on borrowings in Australia denominated in USD. Interest rate risk on borrowings is partially offset by the Group as it has a component of its cash deposits in both floating and fixed rate accounts. The following table sets out the Group’s interest rate risk re-pricing profile: in a$’000 total 6 months or less 6 to 12 months 1 to 2 years 2 to 5 years more than 5 years

June 30, 2013 fixed rate instruments Loans and borrowings Mt Kellett convertible bonds total fixed rate instruments floating rate instruments Cash and cash equivalents Other non-current assets Loans and borrowings Sojitz loan facility total variable rate instruments total June 30, 2012 fixed rate instruments Loans and borrowings Mt Kellett convertible bonds total fixed rate instruments floating rate instruments Cash and cash equivalents Other non-current assets Loans and borrowings Sojitz loan facility total variable rate instruments total (221,479) (3,003) (185,048) (221,479) (3,003) (3,003) – – – – – – – – (182,045) – – – 205,438 13,038 205,438 13,038 – – – – – – – – (182,045) (182,045) – – – – – – (182,045) (182,045) – – (246,359) (90,881) (302,887) (246,359) (90,881) (90,881) – – – – – – – – (212,006) – – – 141,371 14,107 141,371 14,107 – – – – (212,006) (212,006) – – – – – – (212,006) (212,006) – –

The Group’s sensitivity to interest rate risk can be expressed in two ways: Fair value sensitivity analysis A change in interest rates impacts the fair value of the Group’s fixed rate borrowings. Given all debt instruments are carried at amortised cost, a change in interest rates would not impact the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss or the statement of financial position. Cash flow sensitivity analysis A change in interest rates would have an impact on future interest payments and receipts on the Group’s floating rate assets and liabilities. An increase or decrease in interest rates of 50 basis points at the reporting date would negatively or positively impact both the statement of financial position and profit or loss through the statement of comprehensive income by the amounts shown, based on the assets and liabilities held at the reporting date and a one year time frame. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for comparative periods.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

97

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

50 basis point parallel increase in interest rates 50 basis point parallel decrease in interest rates

(454) 454

(15) 15

(c)

Commodity and other price risk

Commodity and other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices (other than those arising from interest rate risk or currency risk), whether those changes are caused by factors specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer or factors affecting all similar financial instruments traded in the market.

27.3 Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and related entities. The Group’s exposure to credit risk is primarily in its other receivables and is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. Demographically there are no material concentrations of credit risk.

27.4 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not meet its contractual obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities as and when they fall due and comply with covenants under both normal and stressed conditions. The Group evaluates its liquidity requirements on an on-going basis and ensures that it has sufficient cash on demand to meet expected operating expenses including the servicing of financial obligations. This excludes the potential impact of extreme circumstances that cannot reasonably be predicted, such as natural disasters. The following table sets out contractual cash flows for all financial liabilities including derivatives: weighteD average effeCtive interest rate

in a$’000

total

1 month or less

1 to 3 months

3 months to 1 year

1 to 5 years

more than 5 years

June 30, 2013 non-derivative financial liabilities Trade and other payables Loans and borrowings Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds total June 30, 2012 non-derivative financial liabilities Trade and other payables Loans and borrowings Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds total
*

n/a 4.79% *

34,297 275,681 268,716 578,694

34,297 – – 34,297

– 7,016 1,863 8,879

– 17,810 5,589 23,399

– 250,855 261,264 512,119

– – – –

n/a 3.75% *

48,331 252,555 260,913 561,799

48,331 643 713 49,687

– 1,287 1,425 2,712

– 8,559 6,413 14,972

– 242,066 252,362 494,428

– – – –

The cash coupon on the instrument of 2.75% is payable on the $US225 million principal. The weighted average effective interest rate is 8.07% on the Mt Kellett convertible bonds. This rate is impacted by the unwinding of the equity component of the instrument which is recognised as a component of the Group’s net financing expenses.

98

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

27.5 Classification and fair values in a$’000 available for sale Cash, loans anD reCeivables other liabilities total Carrying amount total fair value

June 30, 2013 assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Current tax receivable Prepayments Available for sale financial assets Other assets total assets liabilities Trade and other payables Loans and borrowings: Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds total liabilities June 30, 2012 assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Prepayments Available for sale financial assets Other assets total assets liabilities Trade and other payables Tax payable Loans and borrowings: Sojitz loan facility Mt Kellett convertible bonds total liabilities – – – – – – (221,479) (181,583) (451,513) (221,479) (181,583) (451,513) (221,479) (181,583) (451,513) – – – – (48,331) (120) (48,331) (120) (48,331) (120) – – – 3,754 – 3,754 205,438 1,538 932 – 13,038 220,946 – – – – – – 205,438 1,538 932 3,754 13,038 224,700 205,438 1,538 932 3,754 13,038 224,700 – – – – – – (246,359) (211,658) (492,314) (246,359) (211,658) (492,314) (246,359) (211,658) (492,314) – – (34,297) (34,297) (34,297) – – – – 1,802 – 1,802 141,371 1,765 49 3,946 – 17,396 164,527 – – – – – – – 141,371 1,765 49 3,946 1,802 17,396 166,329 141,371 1,765 49 3,946 1,802 17,396 166,329

The Group did not have any financial assets or financial liabilities classified as fair value through profit or loss at June 30, 2013 (June 30, 2012: none). The methods used in determining fair values of financial instruments are discussed in note 5.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

99

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

27.6 Fair value measurements recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
Subsequent to initial recognition, the Group measures financial instruments at fair value grouped into the following levels based on the degree to which the fair value is observable. • Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets; • Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and • Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). As at June 30, 2013, the Group had available for sale financial assets comprising listed shares of $1.8 million (June 30, 2012: $3.8 million) that were classified as Level 1 financial instruments. The Group did not hold any level 2 or level 3 financial instruments as at June 30, 2013 (June 30, 2012: none).

28. relateD parties
28.1 Key management personnel compensation for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

The aggregate compensation made to the Directors and other members of KMP of the Group is set out below:

Short-term employee benefits Other long-term benefits Share-based payments total compensation paid to key management personnel

4,894,174 1,157,690 1,047,358 7,099,222

3,984,094 376,546 7,403,530 11,764,170

The compensation of each member of the KMP of the Group for the current and prior year is set out within the Remuneration Report.

28.2 Transactions with key management personnel
Key management personnel equity holdings
The following tables outline the fully paid ordinary shares of the Group held by the Directors and other members of KMP during the 2013 and 2012 financial years: balanCe at July 1, 2012 reCeiveD on exerCise of options net other balanCe at Change June 30, 2013

June 30, 2013

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro K. Conlon(1) N. Curtis(2) D. Davidson(3) W. Forde A. Jury(4) J. Klein E. Noyrez(5) Z. Switkowski(6) total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

3,000 2,828 – 18,154 16,045,758 700,828 1,001,656 20,828 2,082,236 – 700,828 20,576,116

– – – – – – – – – – – –

4,464 – – 111,361 – 26,785 26,785 79,172 – – 26,785 275,352

7,464 2,828 – 129,515 16,045,758 727,613 1,028,441 100,000 2,082,236 – 727,613 20,851,468

Shares held by spouse. Ceased to be a member of the Executive and assumed role of Non-Executive Chairman from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. Appointed as Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs with effect from April 2, 2013. Appointed as CEO and an Executive Director, and ceased to act as COO and President, with effect from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013.

100

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

June 30, 2012

balanCe at July 1, 2011

reCeiveD on exerCise of options

net other Change

balanCe at June 30, 2012

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro(1) K. Conlon(2) N. Curtis D. Davidson W. Forde J. Klein E. Noyrez Z. Switkowski J. Taylor(3) M. James total
(1) (2) (3) (4)
(5)

1,000 2,828 – – 16,045,758 700,828 1,001,656 2,082,236 – 400,828 71,973 1,151,058 21,458,165

– – – – – – – – – – – – –

2,000 – – 18,154 – – – – – 300,000 (71,973)(4) (1,151,058)
(6)

3,000 2,828 – 18,154 16,045,758 700,828 1,001,656 2,082,236 – 700,828 – –

(902,877) 20,555,288

Appointed CFO from December 12, 2012. Appointed Director from November 1, 2012. Shares in the Company held by spouse. Ceased as a member of the KMP on December 12, 2012. During the period J. Taylor ceased being a member of the KMP. All fully paid ordinary shares on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure. (5) Ceased as a member of the KMP on August 31, 2012. (6) During the period M. James ceased being a member of the KMP. All fully paid ordinary shares on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure.

Key management personnel share options
The following tables outline the options and performance rights issued for the benefit of Directors and the KMP during the 2013 and 2012 financial years and those options which have vested at each respective year-end. balanCe at beginning June 30, 2013 of perioD options exerCiseD/ CanCelleD/ other options expireD without exerCise net Change balanCe at enD of perioD amount vesteD at June 30, 2013

granteD

grant Date

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro K. Conlon N. Curtis(1) D. Davidson(2) W. Forde A. Jury(3) J. Klein E. Noyrez(4) Z. Switkowski(5) total
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

6,835,000 2,060,000 2,000,000 – 30,000,000 3,100,000 4,000,000 – 3,100,000 10,000,000 – 61,095,000

1,057,402 September 25, 2012 439,806 September 25, 2012 453,172 September 25, 2012 – – – – – – – 3,263,233 – – – – – – –

(750,000) (100,000) – – (4,500,000) (600,000) (750,000) – (600,000) – (8,800,000)

– (200,000) – – – – – – – – –

307,402 139,806 453,172 – (600,000) (750,000) – (600,000) (187,147) –

7,142,402 2,199,806 2,453,172 – 2,500,000 3,250,000 – 2,500,000 9,812,853 –

4,400,000 450,000 – – 17,000,000 1,900,000 2,500,000 – 1,900,000 5,000,000 –

(4,500,000) 25,500,000

1,312,853 September 25, 2012 (1,500,000)

(200,000) (5,736,767) 55,358,233 33,150,000

Ceased to be a member of the Executive and assumed role of Non-Executive Chairman from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013. Appointed as Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs with effect from April 2, 2013. Appointed as CEO and an Executive Director, and ceased to act as COO and President, with effect from March 31, 2013. Resigned with effect from August 20, 2013.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

101

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

balanCe at beginning June 30, 2012 of perioD

granteD

grant Date

options exerCiseD/ CanCelleD/ other(1)

options expireD without exerCise net Change

balanCe at enD of perioD

amount vesteD at June 30, 2012

A. Arnold G. Barr L. Catanzaro K. Conlon(3) N. Curtis D. Davidson W. Forde J. Klein E. Noyrez Z. Switkowski J. G. Taylor(4) M. James(5) total
(2)

5,900,000 850,000 – – 31,000,000 3,100,000 4,000,000 3,100,000 8,000,000 – 2,500,000 7,250,000 65,700,000

935,000 September 23, 2011 1,210,000 September 23, 2011 2,000,000 December 12, 2011 – – – – – – 11,165,000 – – – – – – 4,000,000 November 30, 2011(6)

– – – – – – – – – –

– – – – (5,000,000) – – – – – –

935,000 1,210,000 2,000,000 – – – – 2,000,000 – (2,500,000) (7,250,000)

6,835,000 2,060,000 2,000,000 – 3,100,000 4,000,000 3,100,000 10,000,000 – – –

2,000,000 450,000 – – 5,000,000 800,000 1,100,000 800,000 – – – –

(1,000,000) 30,000,000

2,000,000 September 23, 2011

1,020,000 September 23, 2011 (3,520,000)

(5,250,000) (2,000,000)

(8,770,000) (7,000,000) (4,605,000) 61,095,000 10,150,000

(1) Other represents the de-recognition of Options and Performance Rights of individuals no longer members of the KMP or who have resigned their employment with the Group. (2) Appointed CFO from December 12, 2011. (3) Appointed as a Non-Executive Director from November 1, 2011. (4) Ceased as a member of the KMP on December 12, 2011, all Options on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure. (5) Resigned August 31, 2011, all Options on issue at this time ceased being reported from this date for the purpose of this disclosure. (6) The Options issued to N. Curtis were approved by the Board on September 23, 2011 subject to shareholder approval, and subsequently approved by the shareholders of the Company at the AGM on November 30, 2011.

All share options and performance rights issued to KMP were made in accordance with the provisions of the employee share option plan. Further details of the employee share option plan and of the share options granted during the 2013 financial year are contained in note 30. Other than those noted above, there were no transactions entered into by the Group with the KMP during the 2013 and 2012 financial years.

28.3 Other related party transactions
Lynas Corporation Limited is the ultimate controlling party of the Group. Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.

102

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

29. group entities ownership interest as at June 30, name of group entity prinCipal aCtivity Country of inCorporation 2013 2012

Lynas Malaysia Sdn Bdh Lynas Services Pty Ltd* Mount Weld Holdings Pty Ltd* Mount Weld Mining Pty Ltd* Mount Weld Rare Earths Pty Ltd* Lynas Africa Holdings Pty Ltd* Lynas Africa Ltd
*

Operation and continued development of advanced material processing plant Provision of corporate services Holding company Development of mining areas of interest and operation of concentration plant Dormant Holding company Mineral exploration

Malaysia Australia Australia Australia Australia Australia Malawi

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Entity has entered into a deed of cross guarantee with Lynas Corporation Limited pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418 and is relieved from the requirement to prepare and lodge an audited financial report, as discussed in note 33. Entity is also a member of the tax-consolidated group.

30. employee share option plan
The Group has established an employee share plan whereby, at the discretion of Directors, options and performance rights may be granted over the ordinary shares of the Company for the benefit of Directors, Executives and certain employees of the Group. The options and performance rights which are issued are granted in accordance with performance guidelines established by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Each option or performance right is convertible into one ordinary share of the Company during the two years following the vesting date, which is the third anniversary of the grant date. The exercise price for the options is not less than the VWAP for the five days preceding the date the option is granted. The options or performance rights hold no voting or dividend rights and are not transferable. Options and performance rights are provided to Key Management Personnel (“KMP”) and other selected employees to provide greater alignment to our strategic business objectives. KMP are those people who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the major activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, including any Director (whether executive or otherwise) of the Group and the Executive. The Executive include The Executive Chairman (until March 31, 2013), the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) (from March 31, 2013), the President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) (until March 31, 2013), the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), the Group’s General Counsel and Company Secretary, the Executive Vice President People and Culture, and the Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs (from April 2, 2013).

30.1 Movements in share options and performance rights during the year for the year enDeD June 30, 2013 number of options (‘000) weighteD average exerCise priCe ($) for the year enDeD June 30, 2012 number of options (‘000) weighteD average exerCise priCe ($)

Balance at beginning of year Granted during the year Expired during the year Exercised during the year Forfeited during the year balance at end of year Exercisable at end of year

83,029 4,122 (665) (1,130) (12,871) 72,485 42,800

0.92 0.37 – 0.20 1.09 0.87 0.68

82,329 12,170 (1,320) (1,382) (8,768) 83,029 19,850

0.84 1.53 1.31 0.89 1.00 0.92 0.70

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

103

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

During the year ended June 30, 2013 the Group recognised a net expense of $1.1 million within the profit and loss component of the statement of comprehensive income (2012: net expense $9.4 million). The net expense during the year ended June 30, 2013 included the reversal of prior period expenses totalling $5.5 million associated with the forfeitures of 50% of the outstanding options and performance rights issued on August 19, 2010 and 50% of specific performance rights issued on September 22, 2011 resulting from the Group not achieving a specified net operating cash flow target (non-market vesting condition).

30.2 Options and performance rights exercised during the year
The following share options were exercised during the year ended June 30, 2013: number exerCiseD share priCe at exerCise Date ($) exerCise priCe ($)

exerCise Date

September 6, 2012 September 6, 2012 September 27, 2012

1,000,000 100,000 30,232 1,130,232

0.84 0.84 0.80

0.16 0.66 0.00

30.3 Options and performance rights outstanding at the end of the year
The share options outstanding at the end of the year had a weighted average exercise price of $0.87 (2012: $0.92 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 607 days (2012: 943 days).

30.4 Options and performance rights issued in the period
The following table summarises the performance conditions attached to Options and Performance Rights issued during the financial year ended June 30, 2013 with respect to the performance of the Group’s employees during the financial year ended June 30, 2012: vesting sCheDule for grants maDe in fy2013 (relateD to fy12 performanCe)

tsr hurdle (50%) 50% of the TSR portion will vest for: (performance against asx 100 companies) 100% of the TSR portion will vest for: reo capacity hurdle (50%) n/a

51st percentile performance 76th percentile performance The Lynas Kuantan plant must have demonstrated the capacity to produce at a rate equivalent to 22,000 tonnes per annum of REO before the end of calendar year 2013

Pro-rata vesting will occur between each of the above points

In addition to these requirements, the employee is required to be still employed by the Group at the end of a three year vesting period unless the condition is waived by the Company. In accordance with the Group’s policy that governs trading of the Company’s shares by Directors and employees, Directors and employees are not permitted to hedge their options or performance rights before the options vest. The weighted average fair value of the share options granted during the financial year is $427,550 (2012:$1,041,087). Options were priced using a Black Scholes methodology. Where relevant the expected life used in the model has been adjusted based on management’s best estimate for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions (including the probability of meeting market conditions attached to the option), and behavioural considerations. Expected volatility is based on the historical share price volatility over the past three years and peer volatility. option series t option series u

Grant date share price ($) Exercise price ($) Expected volatility Option life Dividend yield Risk-free interest rate

0.795 1.02 50% 5 years Nil 2.63%

0.795 0.00 50% 5 years Nil 2.58%

104

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

30.5 Options and performance rights still to vest or yet to expire
The following table lists any options and performance rights which are still to vest, or have yet to expire:
Date vesteD anD exerCisable exerCise priCe value per option at grant Date

series

grant Date

number

expiry Date

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U

July 21, 2008 September 24, 2008 September 24, 2008 January 5, 2009 July 10, 2009 October 8, 2009 July 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 August 19, 2010* October 1, 2010 August 19, 2010 May 18, 2011 June 6, 2011* November 30, 2011 September 23, 2011 September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* September 22, 2011* December 12, 2011 September 25, 2012 September 25, 2012* total

1,000,000 14,100,000 2,700,000 100,000 200,000 24,500,000 1,000,000 5,250,000 604,309 1,000,000 6,450,000 200,000 420,000 4,000,000 4,145,000 9,302 4,651 765,000 2,000,000 1,510,574 2,526,360 72,485,196

July 21, 2011 September 24, 2011 September 24, 2011 January 5, 2012 September 24, 2011 October 8, 2012 July 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2013 August 19, 2013 October 1, 2011 June 6, 2014 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2013 September 22, 2014 September 22, 2014 December 12, 2014 September 24, 2015 September 24, 2015

July 21, 2013 September 24, 2013 September 24, 2013 January 5, 2014 September 24, 2013 October 8, 2014 July 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 August 19, 2015 October 1, 2015 August 19, 2015 December 31, 2015 June 6, 2016 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2015 September 22, 2016 September 22, 2016 December 12, 2016 September 24, 2017 September 24, 2017

$ 0.98 $ 0.66 $ 0.81 $ 0.16 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 0.66 $ 1.15 $ 0.00 $ 1.60 $ 1.15 $ 2.36 $ 0.00 $ 1.69 $ 1.69 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $0.00 $ 1.57 $ 1.02 $ 0.00

$ 0.52 $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.16 $ 0.08 $ 0.23 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.96 $ 0.48 $ 0.66 $ 1.12 $ 2.30 $ 0.40 $ 0.55 $ 1.41 $ 1.41 $1.34 $ 0.51 $ 0.26 $ 0.72

September 22, 2014(1) September 22, 2016

(1) The options issued to N. Curtis were initially approved by the Board on September 23, 2011 and then subsequently approved by the shareholders of the Company at the AGM on November 30, 2011. * Denotes Performance Rights which are issued on the same terms as Options, except there is no consideration payable on exercise.

31. operating leases
Leases as lessee
Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows: as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Less than one year Between one and five years More than five years total

5,230 12,271 6,918 24,419

4,698 8,133 – 12,831

During the year ended June 30, 2013 $4.6 million was recognised as an expense in the statement of comprehensive income as a component of the profit or loss in respect of operating leases (2012: $3.9 million). The Group has contracts for several operating leases for business premises located in Sydney, Perth, Laverton, Beijing, Kuala Lumpur and Gebeng. The Group also has several operating leases for motor vehicles and mobile plant and equipment.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

105

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

32. Capital Commitments
There were no outstanding commitments which are not disclosed in the consolidated financial report of the Group as at June 30, 2013 other than:

Exploration commitments as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Less than one year Between one and five years More than five years total

304 1,229 3,366 4,899

270 1,034 3,076 4,380

These include commitments relating to tenement lease rentals and the minimum expenditure requirements of the Department of Mines and Petroleum attaching to the tenements and are subject to re-negotiation upon expiry of the exploration leases or when application for a mining licence is made. These are necessary in order to maintain the tenements in which the Group and other parties are involved. All parties are committed to meet the conditions under which the tenements were granted in accordance with the relevant mining legislation.

Capital commitments as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Less than one year total

2,388 2,388

68,021 68,021

At June 30, 2013 capital commitments relate to on-going capital project costs in Malaysia. All Phase 1 and Phase 2 costs in Malaysia and Mt Weld are fully accrued at year-end.

Other commitments as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Less than one year Between one and five years More than five years total

13,084 38,322 – 51,406

– – – –

Lynas is required to pay in instalments, a total of US$50 million to the Malaysian AELB in accordance with the conditions underlying the granting of Lynas’ TOL for the LAMP in Gebeng Malaysia. During the year Lynas has transferred $3.3 million to the Malaysian government’s AELB, refer to note 19.

33. DeeD of Cross guarantee
Pursuant to ASIC Class Order 98/1418 (as amended) dated August 13, 1998, the wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries of Lynas Corporation Limited are relieved from the Corporations Act 2001 requirements for preparation, audit and lodgement of financial reports, and Director’s reports. It is a condition of the Class Order that the Company and each of the subsidiaries enter into a Deed of Cross Guarantee. The effect of the Deed is that the Company guarantees to each creditor payment in full of any debt in the event of winding up of any of the subsidiaries under certain provisions of the Corporations Act 2001. If a winding up event occurs under any other provision of the Act, the Company will only be liable in the event that after six months any creditor has not been paid in full. The subsidiaries have also given similar guarantees in the event that the Company is wound-up. The subsidiaries in addition to the Company subject to the deed are specified in note 29. A statement of comprehensive income and statement of financial position, comprising the Company and controlled entities which are party to the Deed, after eliminating all transactions between parties to the Deed of Cross Guarantee is presented as follows.

106

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Statement of Financial Position as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Assets Cash and cash equivalents Trade and other receivables Inventories total current assets Inventories Property, plant and equipment Deferred exploration, evaluation and development expenditure Intangible assets – software Available for sale financial assets Investments in subsidiaries Other assets total non-current assets total assets Liabilities Trade and other payables Borrowings Deferred income Employee benefits total current liabilities Provisions Employee benefits Borrowings total non-current liabilities total liabilities net assets Equity Share capital Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) Reserves total equity 994,645 (272,662) 82,037 804,020 823,161 (210,387) 68,145 680,919 (11,094) (10,949) (5,420) (1,720) (29,183) (24,472) (204) (447,068) (471,744) (500,927) 804,020 (8,000) – – (1,337) (9,337) (3,777) (414) (403,062) (407,253) (416,590) 680,919 139,677 1,687 37,463 178,827 11,856 123,632 47,654 337 1,802 375,080 565,759 1,126,120 1,304,947 181,221 2,086 31,882 215,189 13,272 98,270 26,342 261 3,754 375,080 365,341 882,320 1,097,509

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

107

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

Statement of Comprehensive Income for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Revenue Cost of sales gross profit Other income Impairment reversal (impairment) of intercompany balances General and administration expenses Other expenses profit (loss) from operating activities Financial income Financial expenses net financial income (expenses) profit (loss) before income tax Income tax benefit (expense) profit (loss) for the year from continuing operations other comprehensive income, net of income tax Exchange differences on translating foreign operations Gain (loss) on available for sale financial assets total other comprehensive profit (loss) for the year, net of income tax total comprehensive income (loss) for the year

10,863 (9,146) 1,717 9,795 (2,592) (60,689) (1,327) (53,096) 4,914 (11,546) (6,632) (59,728) (2,547) (62,275) 13,307 (865) 12,442 (49,833)

– – – 11,222 125,432 (60,232) – 76,422 4,073 (30,040) (25,967) 50,455 10,394 60,849 4,858 (4,653) 205 61,054

108

notes to the financial statements
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

34. Company entity information as at June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Current assets total assets Current liabilities total liabilities net assets Share capital Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) Reserves total shareholders’ equity

24,427 1,445,777 (14,631) (461,701) 984,076 994,645 (152,356) 141,787 984,076

179,800 1,192,163 (2,927) (419,815) 772,348 823,161 (143,074) 92,261 772,348

for the year enDeD June 30, in a$’000 2013 2012

Profit (loss) of the Company total comprehensive income (loss) of the parent Company

(9,282) (10,147)

81,889 82,094

35. ContingenCies
Litigation and legal proceedings
As a result of its operations the Group has certain contingent liabilities related to certain litigation and legal proceedings. The Group has determined that the possibility of a material outflow related to these contingent liabilities is remote.

Security and guarantee arrangements
Certain members of the Group have entered into guarantee and security arrangements in respect of the Group’s indebtedness as described in note 23.

36. subsequent events
On September 13, 2013 the Group entered into a deed of amendment to modify certain provisions under the Sojitz Loan Facility. Reference should be made to note 23 to the Financial Report for further details. With the exception of the above, there have been no other events subsequent to June 30, 2013 that would require accrual or disclosure in this financial report.

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

109

asX aDDitional information

Additional information required by the Australian Securities Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report. The information is current as at September 6, 2013.

(a)

Distribution of ordinary shares

The number of shareholders, by size of holding, of ordinary shares is:

Ordinary shares holDings ranges holDers number of holDers number of shares

1-1,000 1,001-5,000 5,001-10,000 10,001-100,000 100,001-99,999,999,999 totals The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel of shares

4,938 11,894 7,104 12,593 1,485

3,199,909 35,623,213 56,685,961 393,574,260 1,471,717,949 5,503

0.163 1.817 2.891 20.072 75.057 100.000 3,840,481

38,014 1,960,801,292

(b)

Distribution of Options/ Performance Rights various DireCtors anD employees

The numbers of holders, by size of holding, in each class of unlisted options are:

1 – 1,000 1,001 – 5,000 5,001 – 10,000 10,001 – 100,000 100,001 and over total

– – – 39 27 66

110

asX aDDitional information

(c)

Twenty largest shareholders listeD orDinary shares

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted shares are:

holDer name

number of shares

perCentage of orDinary shares

1. JP MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 2. HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED 3. NATIONAL NOMINEES LIMITED 4. CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 5. J P MORGAN NOMINEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED 6. BNP PARIBAS NOMS PTY LTD 7. CITICORP NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 8. DYNAMIC SUPPLIES INVESTMENTS PTY LTD 9. 3RD WAVE INVESTORS LTD 10. UOB KAY HIAN PRIVATE LIMITED 11. JAPAN AUSTRALIA RARE EARTHS BV 12. MR CONGLIN YUE 13. UCA GROWTH FUND LIMITED 14. DMG & PARTNERS SECURITIES PTE LTD 15. LANDO PTY LTD 16. MERRILL LYNCH (AUSTRALIA) NOMINEES PTY LIMITED 17. AMP LIFE LIMITED 18. SILMAR PTY LIMITED 19. HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED - A/C 2 20. ALIANA PTY LTD total

225,720,956 203,825,522 150,202,637 121,807,146 107,993,268 50,800,421 21,698,970 20,500,000 15,000,000 13,573,600 10,972,275 10,600,000 10,000,000 9,312,063 9,050,000 8,956,870 6,763,680 6,003,234 5,988,097 5,767,519 1,014,536,288

11.512 10.395 7.660 6.212 5.508 2.591 1.107 1.045 0.765 0.692 0.560 0.541 0.510 0.475 0.462 0.457 0.345 0.306 0.305 0.294 51.742

(d) (e) (f)

Substantial shareholders Voting rights Schedule of interests in mining tenements tenement perCentage helD

The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B of the Corporation Act 2001 are: Nil. All ordinary shares (whether fully paid or not) carry one vote per share without restriction.

loCation

mt weld rare earths project Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld Mt Weld kangankunde rare earths project Kangankunde, Malawi ML 0122/2003 100 M38/58 M38/59 M38/326 M38/327 E38/2224 E38/2359 E38/2558 L38/224 L38/98 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

lynas Corporation limiteD ANNUAL REPORT 2013

111

corporate information
ABN 27 009 066 648

REgiStEREd OFFiCE
Level 7, 56 Pitt Street, SYdNEY NSW 2000 tel: +61 2 8259 7100 Fax: +61 2 8259 7199 Email: general@lynascorp.com

ShARE REgiStRY
Boardroom Pty Ltd Level 7, 207 Kent Street, SYdNEY NSW 2000 tel: +61 2 9290 9600 Fax: +61 2 9279 0664 Email: enquiries@boardroomlimited.com.au

AuditORS
Ernst & Young 680 george Street, SYdNEY NSW 2000

www.lynascorp.com

112

www.lynascorp.com