“In Defense of Prejudice” Jonathan Rauch created an argument in favor of prejudice and the idea to promote intellectual pluralism. Essentially Rauch believes that when someone is saying something that may seem, sexist, racist, homophobic, etc it should not be considered hate speech and must be censored but instead be view as their own hypothesis or belief. We as humans allow so people can have the right to free speech. Thus instead of trying to monitor what people say have those who say what is morally right come out on top of society. I completely agree, today we live in a country extremely divided on what we should and should not say. Why can comedians only make fun of certain politicians or groups of people? Why does youtube demonetize