Free Essay

Keynes

In:

Submitted By aakritig2015
Words 2548
Pages 11
Introduction
In 1944, delegates from the most influential nations met at Mount Washington Hotel, New Hampshire, Bretton Woods in a conference later called the ‘Bretton Woods Conference’, to discuss their vision for rebuilding the world economy after the ravaging war. John Maynard Keynes, perhaps the biggest economist celebrity of his time, attended the conference with his own idea of how the post-war economy should shape up. Unfortunately for him, and perhaps for us all, his ideas were overruled in favor of American treasury secretary, Harry Dexter White’s plan, and was lost in the annals of history, before seeing renewed resurgence in the context of contemporary instabilities in the international monetary system, forcing a rethink of what was lost in the conference years ago.

The Bretton Woods Conference was a defining event in world history, as it established the monetary system that we see today. Dollar hegemony and its status as a reserve currency has been called an ‘exorbitant privilege’, against which there have been voices time and again, but never has the wave been as strong as today. From a concern by economists, such as Triffin, Monbiot, Skidelsky, the overreaching impact of the economic recession of the late 2000s has led to significant doubts about the current system for policymakers and national leaders. In 2008, Monbiot recalled Keynes while analysing the financial instability of 2008, “John Maynard Keynes had the answer to the crisis we’re now facing; but it was blocked and then forgotten”. Skidelsky talks about reforming the ‘non-system’ by focusing on Keynes’ Clearing Union proposals and suggests that it is desirable to shift towards SDRs or a similar basket of currencies to replace the existing system of reserve currency. In 2009, Zhou Xiaochuan, the governor of People’s Bank of China, voiced his strong views in favour of moving away from the dollar and again recalling Keynes’ idea for Bancor. More recently, policymakers from France, Russia and China have called for a change in the international monetary system and the establishment of a different reserve currency. Important to note is also the fact that over the past decade, dollar representation in foreign exchange reserves has gone down from 71% in 2001 to 61% in 2013. All these factors hint at the instability the international monetary system is undergoing. With this paper, we intend to understand the Keynesian proposal in the historical backdrop, and analyse the feasibility and need for a similar system today, evaluating a contemporary application to Keynes’ theories in the modern context.

Keynes , Clearing Union and Bancor
Origin

The white paper on International Clearing Union (ICU) written by John Maynard Keynes, also knows as Lord Keynes or 1st Baron Keynes, was released as a white paper by the British government in April 1943 titles as “Proposals for an International Clearing Union”

At the beginning of the paper we came across the following

“The particular proposal set forth below lay no claim to originality. They are an attempt to reduce to practical shape certain general ideas belonging to the contemporary climate of economic opinion, which have been given publicity in recent months by writers of several different nationalities”1 (Reference: IMF docs)
This piqued our interest as to identify the writers Keynes referred to, as it would help us better understand the origins of this idea. Our research on this topic led us to work of H.D. White, National Clearing Fund proposal of E.F.Schumacher and the ‘ New plan’ by Dr. Hjalmar Schacht and the ‘New order’ Dr. Walter Funk
Basis our research, we think that the ‘New Order’ plan played a significant part in the development of Keynes proposal.
The ‘New plan’ as conceived by Dr. Schacht was the summarization of exchange controls established by Germany with its trading partners. In 1932 Germany has entered into multiple bilateral clearing agreements that with its trading partner countries2 (Reference : 9 Child (1958, p.38)
However, this model led to bilaterally unsettled balances and clearing of these balances presented a challenge. The ‘New order’ plan suggested by Dr. Funk in July of 1940 offered a solution to this problem. The key points were * Reischmark will be the international currency in Germany controlled geography * Reischmark will be stabilized against gold or US Dollar * National currencies will remain and will be stablised w.r.t. Reischmark * Berlin would be the central clearing house for Europan payments
Thus the ‘ New order’ plan led to creation of a multilateral clearing system. 3 (Reference : Einzich (1941, p.2))
The ‘New order ‘ was seen as the first practical plan post the postwar monetary and economic order. 4 (van Dormael (1978, p.5))
Concerned by the growing acceptance and influence of the‘New Order plan’, in November of 1940, H. Nicolson – the then Minister of Information in British Government, requested Keynes to critically review the german proposal and requested him to prepare a counterproposal. Keynes replied to this request:
In my opinion about three-quarters of passages quoted from the German broadcasts would be quite excellent if the name of Great Britain were substituted for German or the Axis, as the case may be. If Funk's plan is taken at its face value, it is excellent and just what we ourselves ought to be thinking of doing.(ibid., p.2)
In December of 1940, Keynes circulated a memorandum titled ‘ Proposal to Counter the German “New Order”. In the memorandum, Keynes says In the memorandum he says : "After the last war laissez-faire in foreign exchange led to chaos. Tariffs offers no escape from this. But in Germany Schacht and Funk were by force o f necessity to evolve something better. In practice they have used their new system to the detriment of their neighbours. But the underlying idea is sound and good" (ibid., p.8-9)
The above-mentioned quotes clearly shows that Keynes was impressed by the underlying idea of the proposal made by Dr. Schacht and Dr. Funk. He also realized that this idea could be of utmost importance in creating a postwar globally accepted monetary system. Keynes draft of International Clearing Union also seems to be reflect the same.

Keynes plan & International Clearing Union

Two years before the Bretton Woods Conference was mooted, Keynes had begun seriously considering a new system of trade accountancy and new international institutions; aware that trade would be a key post-war issue. In a comment that harked back to the currency speculation of the 1930s and which is remarkably prescient of today’s global market where destabilizing, speculative monetary exchanges outweigh trading in goods and services by 20 to 1, Keynes stated:
“Let no one suppose, however, that we for our part intend to return to the chaos of the old world. To do so would be to bankrupt us no less than the others... We intend to develop a system of international exchange in which the trading of goods and services will be the central feature. Financial and capital transactions will play their proper auxiliary role of facilitating trade.”
A fundamental to Keynes’ thinking was the importance of fostering a balance of trade between nations and avoiding the scenario in which some nations become ‘creditors’ and others ‘debtors’ through their trade accounts.
Keynes was aware of the destabilizing macroeconomic effects of such imbalance of trade. Debtor nations found their domestic industry and agriculture seriously depressed, not only by the loss of home markets, but also by the drain of money abroad. These combined to produce a tendency towards recession and low investment. Meanwhile, creditor nations experienced both a boost in demand and a monetary influx. The growth and investment this promoted made them seek export markets with even greater vigour.
This meant that imbalances in trade tended to become self-perpetuating and compounding in effect. Keynes argues that it was fundamental to a constructive framework of international trade that there be a mechanism to ensure a balance of trade between nations – or more accurately, to ensure that imbalances were redressed. The tendency of trade imbalances to become permanent and compounding had to be countered.
Keynes ‘Clearing Union’ was an attempt to construct a machinery that took account of all the potential disturbances and difficulties of international trade. Acknowledging the need for a system of multilateral trade rather than bilateral nation-by-nation accountancy, the Clearing Union sought to foster trade balances by a range of fiscal mechanisms.
Keynes proposed a new, neutral unit of international currency – the ‘Bancor’, and a new institution – the International Clearing or Currency Union (I.C.U.). All international trade would be measured in Bancors. Exporting would accrue Bancors, while importing would expend them. Nations were expected to maintain, within a small percentage, a zero account with the I.C.U. This would indicate that they had an overall equivalence of imports and exports. Each nation’s Bancor account would also be related to its currency through a fixed, but adjustable, exchange rate.
The key feature of Keynes proposal was that it placed an equal obligation on creditor and debtor nations to maintain a balance of trade. In the words of Geoffrey Crowther, former editor of The Economist:
“Debtor and Creditor should be treated almost alike as disturbers of equilibrium.”
Nations that imported more than they exported – debtor nations – would pay a small interest charge to the Clearing Union on their overdrawn account. This would encourage those nations to promote exports by a range of domestic policies as well as marginal currency devaluation. Equally, nations that ran an aggressive trade policy and exported more than they imported, would also be charged by the Clearing Union for their surplus account. This would encourage those nations to find ways to spend their excess Bancors back in debtor nations – or gradually lose that surplus.
The efforts of debtor nations to promote exports were intended to coincide with the efforts of creditor nations to expend their otherwise worthless Bancor surplus. These charges were intended not so much as a deterrent or punishment, but as a benign ‘feedback’ mechanism, ensuring that, over time, trade remained in balance.
In the white paper ‘Proposals for an International Clearing Union’ , dated April 1943, Keynes mentioned that concern of postwar relief and reconstruction would be of utmost importance for all countries . He mentioned that to address these concerns four main lines of approach can be taken : 1. The mechanism of currency and exchange; 2. The framework of a commercial policy regulating the conditions for the exchange of goods, tariffs, preferences, subsidies, import regulations and the like; 3. The orderly conduct of production, distribution and price of primary products so as to protect both producers and consumers from the loss and risk for which the extravagant fluctuations of market conditions have been responsible in recent times; 4. Investment aid, both medium and long term, for the countries whose economic development needs assistance from outside.

However, he concluded that the most important of these approaches would be the mechanism of currency and exchange. He justifies his choice by saying

‘It appears on the whole convenient to give it priority, because some general conclusions have to be reached under this head before much progress can be made with the other topics’
Keynes also mentioned that the for the proposed plan of ICU to be successful and durable, it should satisfy the following criterion: 1. It should have least possible interference with internal policies of any country and the plan should be in line with the international terrain. 2. The technique of the plan should be such that it could be applied to any country, irrespective of the type and principle of government and type of existing economic policies 3. Management of the institution, ICU, should be truly international, rights of smaller countries should be safeguarded and enforcement/veto power shouldn’t be applicable to a country or a group. 4. Voluntary agreements/treaties on the ‘right to act as pleasure’ among the member states/countries, along with provision to void the obligation, as arising due to the proposal, with due notice. 5. Plan should work to provide general as well as individual advantage of the participating member states/countries and doesn’t require any special sacrifices from any country/member state.

As a suggested institution ‘International Clearing Union’ was the manifestation of these idea. The ICU would be capable to lend directly to the central bank (CB) of the member countries. It working principle were same as ‘Banking Principles’ – with Reserves and loans given to CB as assets and CB’s deposits as liabilities. Bancor – term introduced by Keynes in the first draft of the proposal published in February in 1932, was an international currency to be used by ICU for all its transactions.

Bretton Woods Conference
The 1944 Bretton Woods Conference gave rise to the two institutions that have dominated Third World development over the last 50 years. The World Bank was intended to aid post-war reconstruction, especially in poorer countries, by providing them with loans for development. The International Monetary Fund came into existence a year later, in 1945. Its purpose was to provide an international reserve of money – a financial pool – upon which all member countries could call, whether rich or poor, should they hit temporary payment difficulties due to a deficit in their trade accounts.
At the conference, during the months building up to it and for many years after, there were profound disagreements over the financial architecture established at Bretton Woods. Some of the disputes were over relatively minor matters such as the size of each countries monetary quota, ranking, voting rights and where the offices of the IMF and World Bank were to be situated. The deeper disagreements involved the actual structure of the new institutions, their purpose and powers, the future framework of monetary exchanges and landing – indeed the entire nature of international trade.
The most salient dispute concerned the key issue of the balance of trade between nations’ sustained trade imbalances leading to ‘creditor’ and ‘debtor’ countries had been recognised as a major cause of inter-war trading/financial chaos. The issue of the balance of trade was highlighted by the contrast between the two main schemes under consideration at the conference.
In the months leading up to the conference, the two major world powers, America and Britain, each tabled proposals suggesting a framework for international trade. These proposals were fundamentally different in character. They were based upon different priorities and with totally opposing views of the purpose of international trade and how this purpose might best be fostered. The British prepared a proposal, largely the work of John Maynard Keynes, for a system of trade accountancy, which Keynes called the ‘International Clearing Union’. The American plan, drawn up by a number of U.S. Treasury officials including Secretary Henry J. Morgenthau and championed by Harry Dexter White, was for an ‘International Stabilization Fund’. The American proposal and the economic priorities that underpinned it are reflected in the two institutions we have today – the IMF and the World Bank. In short, the American delegation won the day.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. http://www.monbiot.com/2008/11/18/clearing-up-this-mess/
[ 2 ]. http://www.skidelskyr.com/site/article/keynes-global-imbalances-and-international-monetary-reform-today/
[ 3 ]. http://www.bis.org/review/r090402c.pdf
[ 4 ]. http://www.imf.org/external/np/sta/cofer/eng/cofer.pdf

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Keynes

...Реферат на тему "Джон Мейнард Кейнс и его общая теория" СОДЕРЖАНИЕ ВВЕДЕНИЕ 3 ЛИЧНАЯ И СЕМЕЙНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ 5 КЕЙНС И ЕГО РАБОТА 6 "ОБЩАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ЗАНЯТОСТИ, ПРОЦЕНТА И ДЕНЕГ" 9 НОВИЗНА ГЛАВНОЙ ИДЕИ "ОБЩЕЙ ТЕОРИИ" 10 Методологическая связь с концепцией меркантилизма 11 Методологические расхождения с классиками и неоклассиками 11 КОНЦЕПЦИЯ МУЛЬТИПЛИКАТОРА ИНВЕСТИЦИЙ 12 ХВАЛЕБНЫЕ МНЕНИЯ 19 ЛИЧНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ И СМЕРТЬ 20 КЕЙНСИАНСТВО В СОВРЕМЕННОМ МИРЕ 21 СПИСОК ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ 23 ВВЕДЕНИЕ Джон Мейнард Кейнс, 1-ый барон Кейнский, графство Суссекс (5 июня 1883 – 21 апреля 1946) был британским экономистом, чьи идеи во многом повлияли на современную макроэкономику, как в теории, так и на практике. В начале Кейнс был простым экономистом, пытающимся решить некоторые вопросы, ясные ответы на которые еще не были предложены обычными экономистами. В конце концов, он опрокинул основной постулат о том, который он назвал "классической экономикой", что экономия является ключом к экономическому росту и что экономия всегда приведет к инвестициям. Кейнс пришел к выводу, что аппетит к инвестициям, как правило, подкармливает аппетит на экономию, в результате чего экономический рост и занятость ниже опускаются ниже возможного уровня до тех пор, пока не вмешивается правительство. В 1930-х годах Кейнс возглавил революцию в экономическом мышлении, переворачивая старые идеи неоклассической экономической теории, в соответствие с которой свободный рынок будет автоматически...

Words: 4891 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Hayek vs Keynes

...Friedrich August von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have been the focus of a near 100 year long battle regarding how . Time and again, the ideas and theories of Keynes and Hayek have been used to argue for and against the involvement that government has in the fiscal policy making process in the US. Both of them have played roles in the development of American economic policy. Only one of these two men, though, has been accepted as knowledgeable in the halls of government power. And that man is Keynes. As shown in history the theory of the role that government should play in the marketplace from Hayek has been long overlooked. Beginning in the Great Depression era, policy makers in Washington latched on to Keynes’ new theories of stimulating the economy through high levels of government spending. Keynes believed that the government should increase public works projects and stimulus spending which would increase the nation’s aggregate demand, meaning an increase of the total demand for final goods and services. The Great Depression continued on as project after project and program after program failed to yield the results that Keynesians had hoped for. Even when faced with the data that proved the Keynesian theory incorrect, the policy makers argued that spending was just not high enough. On the other side of the argument was Friedrich Hayek, who argued that government planning the economy would never work. As Hayek argued in his book The Fatal Conceit, “the curious task of...

Words: 782 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

John Maynard Keynes

...Running head: JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES Intellectual Biography: John Maynard Keynes Shawn Detamore Davenport University Abstract Known as one of the most influential economist of the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes changed the economy by his Keynesian Economics. Not only was it used during the Great Depression, it is continually used in our economy today. Introduction John Maynard Keynes (also known as “1st Baron Keynes) was a British economist that was born in Cambridge, England. His ideas and theories changed the practice of modern macroeconomics. He is well known for the Keynesian economics that made him one of the most influential economist of the 20th century (Keynes, 2014). Since he was so influential, there were many other economist that were influenced by John Maynard Keynes that supported the Keynesian theory. A few of those economists where: James K. Galbraith, James Tobin, Paul Samuelson and Paul Krugman. Keynes also wrote many books related to economics, one well-known one was the General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. He also wrote A Treatise on Money, The Economic Consequences of Mr. Churchill, and A Tract on Monetary Reform. Keynes was very influential. In 1999, Time Magazine listed John Maynard Keynes as one of the 100 most important and influential people of the 20th century (Time Magazine, 2014). The Economist also named Keynes as Britain’s most famous 20th-century economist. Keynesian Economics Keynesian Economics is the theory...

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Keynes vs. Hayek

...Keynes VS. Hayek John Maynard Keynes developed an economic theory that argues, the government can borrow money. Then spends the means to create jobs and purchasing power. The concept is based on the circular flow of money and the government should step in and increase the money supply or start buying things themselves. Trying to balance the budget during a poor economy would make matters worse not better. The government Keynes beliefs were the government would spend more during a poor economy and cut back during better ones. Friedrich Von Hayek theory states that the problem is under central planning, and that there is no financial calculation that would help make the right resource to spend money. Under his theory, Central planner would make a decision based on accurate information, not economic ones. Less government intervention and more financial freedom are Hayek beliefs to turn around a poor economy. As I read into the two theories, I am finding out that the US economy is most like the Keynes. One point I believe this is because of the massive deficits that are government is occurring. Another example is because Keynes theories consider tariffs and bailout, which we have seen this over the last few years in the auto industries and the financial district. I believe in Hayek theory of the free trade and letting the economy do its part. In my opinion when the government plays a prominent role in the economy, then it is going to be the best decision for the...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

John Maynard Keynes

...John Maynard Keynes He was a famous economist born on 5th June 1883. His father was an economics professor at Cambridge. son of a Cambridge economics professor If ever there was a rock star of economics, it would be John Maynard Keynes. Keynes shares his birthday, June 5th, with Adam Smith and he was born in 1883, the year communist founder Karl Marx died. With these auspicious signs, Keynes seemed to be destined to become a powerful free market force when the world was facing a serious choice between communism or capitalism. Instead, he offered a third way, which turned the world of economics upside down. In this article, we'll examine Keynes' doctrine and its impact. (To read about Adam Smith, be sure to check out Adam Smith: The Father Of Economics.) Keynes was ultimately a successful investor, building up a private fortune. His assets were nearly wiped out following the Stock Market Crash of 1929, which he failed to foresee, but he soon recouped. At Keynes's death, in 1946, his worth stood just short of £500,000 – equivalent to about £11 million ($16.5 million) in 2009. His first prediction was a critique of the reparation payments that were levied against the defeated Germany after WWI. Keynes rightly pointed out that having to pay out the cost of the entire war would force Germany into hyperinflation and have negative consequences all over Europe. He followed this up by predicting that a return to the prewar fixed exchange rate sought by the chancellor of the exchequer...

Words: 2145 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes

...The contribution to economics of Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes both have had a major effect on economic thought and many of their ideas are still influential today. This essay will look at the contribution that both men made to economic thought. According to Adam Smith Institute (2012), Adam Smith was born in 1723 in Scotland and is popularly known as the father of economics. His best known work is called “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” which is more commonly known as the Wealth of Nations. It was published in 1776 and in it; Adam Smith outlines his main economic ideas. Many ideas in the book were not ground breaking or original but Smith was the first to put them all together. In the Wealth of Nations (1776) Smith begins with an example of a factory that produces pins which he uses to explain the benefits of specialisation and division of labour. Smith explains how: “One man draws out the wire; another straights it; a third cuts it; a fourth points it; a fifth grinds it at the top for receiving the head” And so on until the pin is finished. Splitting the production of the pins into different operations, would result in more pins being created. Smith believed that 10 workers could produce 48,000 pins a day using specialisation and division of labour. If the workers were to produce pins individually then Smith believed that they would only produce 20 or less pins a day. It was Smiths...

Words: 1913 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

John Maynard Keynes Economics Paper

...Running head: JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES   1 The Most Influential Economist of the 20th Century Lucas Strader Post University JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES   2 The Most Influential Economist of the 20th Century In the history of economics, John Maynard Keynes is of the most influential people. He strongly influenced the economy and became widely recognized while he was still alive. The man who 75 years ago wrote an essay “The Economic Possibilities for our Grand Children” brought very important issues to our attention. Keynes wondered what kind of world our children would live in, and what sort of tools would they need to succeed and be happy. So what do we know about this extraordinary man, and how did his economic views change our lives? In order to know why Keynes was a successful economist, it is important to know where he came from. John Maynard Keynes was born June 5, 1883 in Cambridge England. His father was an economist and a lecturer at the University of Cambridge, and his mother was a local social reformer. With the assistance and coaching of his parents, Keynes was successful throughout his time in school. Many people were not surprised that Keynes became an economist since his father was a professor of economics. He was good at managing his own finances. His investments with foreign money made him a wealthy man. This allowed him to sponsor the classic ballet along with his Russian...

Words: 1675 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Critical Review of Keynes' General Theory

...A Critical Review of Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest & Money By:- Deepika Rana Priyanka Gupta Biographical Account John Maynard Keynes is doubtlessly one of the most important figures in the entire history of economics. He revolutionized economics with his classic book, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), regarded as probably the most influential social science treatise of the 20th Century. The son of the Cambridge economist and logician John Neville Keynes, John Maynard Keynes, born in 1883, was bred in British elite institutions - Eton and then King's College Cambridge. During his freshman year at Cambridge, Keynes was invited to join an intellectual group called "The Apostles" that met periodically to discuss literary, philosophical, political, and aesthetic questions. Through his association with the Apostles, Keynes became introduced to the philosophy of G. E. Moore; critics note the pervasive influence of Moore's Principia Ethica on Keynes's A Treatise on Probability, his only philosophical work, as well as on his economic methodology. His first book on Indian currency (1913) was directly related to his experience at the India office. From 1914 to 1918, J.M.K. was called to the UK Treasury to assist with the financing of the British war economy. He excelled at his job and the influence he gained earned him a position with the British delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference in 1918. J.M.K was appalled at the vindictive...

Words: 4492 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Keynes

...Table of Contents Why were Keynesian ideas revolutionary? 2 How does Keynes theory work? 4 What economic conditions in your news article that require government intervention? Do you have faith that this intervention will be effective? 7 How have the economists’ views on Keynesian economics changed over time? 9 Is Keynesian economics dead today? 12 Works Cited 14 Appendix A 15 Why you should be wary of the Japanese “revival” 15 Why were Keynesian ideas revolutionary? Keynesian economics is a macroeconomic theory developed by John Maynard Keynes, who is a British economist. According to Keynesian theory, government intervention plays an important role in the economy, and focuses on short-term goals. It is used mostly in times of recession, inflation, unemployment to stabilize the business cycle, therefore active government policy is required and government spending is a good way to put money back into the GDP. (hupii.com) Keynes is famous for his simple explanation for the cause of the Great Depression during the 1930s. His idea was based on a circular flow of money, which states that when spending increases in an economy, earnings will also increase, and the outcome it will lead to even more spending and earnings (economic growth). His ideas had led to a revolution in economic thought. (martinfrost.ws) During the period of World War 2, United States president has spent enormously huge on defence which has that helped revive the U.S economy. Besides...

Words: 3095 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Keynes Model

...of economic thought with its origins in The General Theory of John Maynard Keynes, although its subsequent development was influenced to a large degree by Michał Kalecki, Joan Robinson, Nicholas Kaldor and Paul Davidson. Keynes' biographer Lord Skidelsky writes that the post-Keynesian school has remained closest to the spirit of Keynes' work, particularly in his monetary theory and in rejecting the neutrality of money. Introduction Post-Keynesian economists maintain that Keynes' theory was seriously misrepresented by the two other principle Keynesian schools: neo-Keynesian economics which was orthodox in the 1950s and 60s - and by New Keynesian economics, which together with various strands of neoclassical economics has been dominant in mainstream macroeconomics since the 1980s. Post-Keynesian economics can be seen as an attempt to rebuild economic theory in the light of Keynes's ideas and insights. However even in the early years in the late 1940s post-Keynesians such as Joan Robinson sought to distance themselves from Keynes himself, as well as from the then emergent neo-Keynesianism. Some post-Keynesians took an even more progressive view than Keynes with greater emphases on worker friendly policies and re-distribution. Robinson, Paul Davidson and Hyman Minsky were notable for emphasising the effects on the economy of the practical differences between different types of investments in contrast to Keynes more abstract treatment. A feature of post-Keynesian economics is the principle...

Words: 1626 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Marx vs. Keynes

...Both Karl Marx and John Maynard Keynes greatly influenced the world with their respective economic theories. Born in 1818 in Germany, Marx grew up as the second son of a liberal, middle-class Jewish family. Throughout his life, Marx suffered poverty, and possibly because of his upbringing in life, he creates a disdain for capitalistic views. His most notable books Communist Manifesto and Das Kapital illustrated his well-known theories. Marx died in 1883, and in that same year, the birth of Keynes passed. Born in England, Keynes grew up in a comfortable English social class. Throughout his life, Keynes enjoyed success and great accomplishment. His books Economic Consequences of the Peace and The General Theory made his ideas and thoughts on economics and his view on protecting capitalism notorious. Marx and Keynes, two very different economists with distinctive proposals, share some similarities, but overall, the two possess totally different concepts on capitalism. Marx and Keynes differ in their broader economic views, but they still agree on some levels. Both economists attempt to devise an economic theory that will explain the problems of the real capitalist world in which they lived in during their respective times. Both predict an unstable capitalist system, since they both believe that a perfect capitalistic system rises and falls periodically. Marx supposes that by raising the national product over the long run will cause an ultimate collapse of the system and allow it...

Words: 1144 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Keynes General Theory

....................................................... 4 ð Employment and the essential properties of money: ............................................................... 4 ð Potential instability: ................................................................................................................ 5 ð Investments, saving and banking system:................................................................................. 5 conclusion: ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Page 1 of 5 Keynes’s “GENERAL THEORY” valid only for modern capitalism? This article focuses on the interpretation that restricts the applicability of Keynes General theory for modern capitalism. It makes his...

Words: 2005 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Keynes Versus Hayek

...Keynes versus Hayek There are differences between Keynes and Hayek on the role of savings in the economy. Keynes believed that it was a waste to save money, it only lead to destruction and prevent economic growth. He didn’t agree with private investment. He felt by keeping money in your pocket is senseless because soon we will all be dead. You can’t take the money with you. He also felt that the government should increase spending during times of recessions. In contrast, Hayek believed that you must save money so that you could later invest the money wisely. He felt time would multiply your interest. He felt that time did not matter. He believed the same principles of the economy that applied in the 1920 still applied in 2005. The solution was not to print more money, but to invest the money the money saved. These views are expressed in the lyrics below: {Keynes} So forget about saving, get it straight out of your head. Like I said, in the long run-we’re all dead. Savings is destruction, that’s the paradox of thrift. Don’t keep money in your pocket, or that growth will never lift. [Hayek] Real savings come first if you want to invest. The market coordinates time with interest. Your focus on spending is pushing on thread. In the long run, my friend, it your theory that dead. Whether it’s the late twenties or two thousand and five Booming bad investments, seems like they’d thrive. You must save to invest, don’t use the printing press Or a bust will surely follow...

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

A Report About the Key Concepts About Care Underpinning the Policy Proposals Presented in the Coalition Government’s Department of Health Consultation Document a Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and

...A report about the key concepts about care underpinning the policy proposals presented in the Coalition Government’s Department of Health Consultation Document A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens, (2010) Department of Health website, http://dh.gov.uk/publications Dawn E. Paton Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Aims and objectives 3 1.2 Report structure 3 2 Dept of Health paper: A Vision for Adult Social Care 3 2.1 Background 3 3 Consultation document proposals 3 3.1 Table of proposals 4 3.2 Evidence to support the proposals 5 4 Constructions and locations...

Words: 2309 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Tma 02

...compare and contrast how content analysis and ethnographic research have been used to study children's understanding of friendship. Friendship is a difficult concept to define as it means different things to different people, it could be said that age and culture can change how one looks at friendship. The simplest way to define friendship would be as a relationship between two people who consider themselves “friends”. This essay will also consider the advantages, disadvantages, similarities and differences between two studies that used the content analysis approach and the ethnographic approach. When looking at both bigelow & la gaipa (1975) and william corsaro's (2006) studies I will also look at how there work as influenced future studies in this area of research and what criticism's have been made of there research. When looking firstly at the content analysis approach that bigelow & la gaipa took,to that of corsaro and the ethnographic method there is at first stark similarity,both bigelow & la gaipa and corsaro's studies were looking at what a child's understanding of friendship was. However after the inital comparison the aims are actually quite different,as bigelow & la gaipa's aim was to investigate children's understanding of friendship,in contrast to william corsaro who investigated children's individual understanding of the word “friend” he was interested in how children talked to each other. Basically the main difference is where corsaro explored the term “friend”...

Words: 1171 - Pages: 5