...STUDY: THE PEPSI REFRESH PROJECT Case Study: The Pepsi Refresh Project Emily M. Kamischke Elon University 1 Author Note Emily M. Kamischke, Masters of Interactive Media, Elon University Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Emily Kamischke, ekamischke@elon.edu CASE STUDY: THE PEPSI REFRESH PROJECT 2 Abstract This study aims to describe the successes and failures of the Pepsi Refresh Project and corresponding implications for other corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects seeking to employ information and communications technology (ICT) competitions, crowdsourcing and social media narratives as a means for production of ideas or tasks. The Knight Foundation’s (2009) seven key components of ICT competitions will be used as a framework to review the project and from there analysis of the project will take place using industry information and reviews. Lastly, implication for other ICT competitions will be discussed. Overall, this study explores the Pepsi Refresh Project’s effect on sales and corporate loyalty of consumers for the PepsiCo brand through consumer corporate trust generation. CASE STUDY: THE PEPSI REFRESH PROJECT 3 Case Study: The Pepsi Refresh Project The purpose of this investigation is to complete a case study of the Pepsi Refresh Project and from it devise high impact practices for its application to other corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects. The Pepsi Refresh Project was started in February...
Words: 3974 - Pages: 16
...CASE STUDY: THE PEPSI REFRESH PROJECT 2 Abstract This study aims to describe the successes and failures of the Pepsi Refresh Project and corresponding implications for other corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects seeking to employ information and communications technology (ICT) competitions, crowdsourcing and social media narratives as a means for production of ideas or tasks. The Knight Foundation’s (2009) seven key components of ICT competitions will be used as a framework to review the project and from there analysis of the project will take place using industry information and reviews. Lastly, implication for other ICT competitions will be discussed. Overall, this study explores the Pepsi Refresh Project’s effect on sales and corporate loyalty of consumers for the PepsiCo brand through consumer corporate trust generation. CASE STUDY: THE PEPSI REFRESH PROJECT 3 Case Study: The Pepsi Refresh Project The purpose of this investigation is to complete a case study of the Pepsi Refresh Project and from it devise high impact practices for its application to other corporate social responsibility (CSR) projects. The Pepsi Refresh Project was started in February 2010 using dollars annually used for Super Bowl advertising by PepsiCo and instead directed towards a grant-funding program to find solutions in betterment of communities (Pepsi, 2011a). The project utilized crowdsourcing for both submission and judging. The study will use The Knight...
Words: 3931 - Pages: 16
...PepsiCo and PepsiCo Greater China About PepsiCo PepsiCo is a global food and beverage leader with net revenues of more than $65 billion and a product portfolio that includes 22 brands that generate more than $1 billion each in annual retail sales. Our main businesses – Quaker, Tropicana, Gatorade, Frito-Lay and Pepsi-Cola – make hundreds of enjoyable foods and beverages that are loved throughout the world. PepsiCo’s people are united by our unique commitment to sustainable growth by investing in a healthier future for people and our planet, which we believe also means a more successful future for PepsiCo. We call this commitment Performance with Purpose: PepsiCo’s promise to provide a wide range of foods and beverages for local tastes; to find innovative ways to minimize our impact on the environment by conserving energy and water and reducing packaging volume; to provide a great workplace for our associates; and to respect, support and invest in the local communities where we operate. In recognition of the continued sustainability efforts, PepsiCo was named for the fourth time to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index of the World (DJSI World) and for the fifth time to the Dow Jones Sustainability Index of North America (DJSI North America) in 2010. In 2011, PepsiCo is ranked as the No. 1 company in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) Food and Beverage supersector. PepsiCo is also named the beverage sector leader for the third consecutive year. ...
Words: 3505 - Pages: 15
...The primary purpose of this report is to identify and analyze the two dominant companies in the soft drink industry and determine the strongest performer as an investment opportunity. Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have been competing in the soft drink sector for over a century and both companies enjoy a high degree of brand consciousness globally. Coca-Cola has, until recently, outpaced its number two rival considerably, both in the U.S. and overseas. I will compare the two companies using the following criteria: (a) comparative statistics and relevant figures affecting probability, (b) key ratios, and (c) the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Comparative Statistics: Relevant Figures Affecting Profitability For the purpose of my report, all relevant financial data on both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo was derived from the reliable Yahoo Finance and Morningstar website and the accompanying 10-k reports. Coca-Cola is the largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups in the world. Additionally, the company has ownership interests in numerous bottling and canning operations. Furthermore, Coca-Cola groups its products into eight business divisions including: Africa, Eurasia, European Union, Latin America, North America, Pacific, Bottling Investments, and Corporate. Finished beverage products are sold in more than 200 countries worldwide. Coca-Cola's major products are comprised of: Coca-Cola, Crush, Sprite, Fanta, Diet Coke, POWERade, Fruitopia...
Words: 2527 - Pages: 11
...Portfolio Project Portfolio Project **** Numbers in Millions throughout project **** a. Coca-Cola – “The Coca-Cola Company is the largest manufacturer, distributor and marketer of nonalcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups in the world “(Coca-Cola Company pg. 3). PepsiCO inc. – “We are the leading global snack and beverage company. We manufacture, market and sell a variety of salty, convenient, sweet and grain-based snacks, carbonated and non-carbonated beverages and foods” (PepsiCo inc. pg 32). b. In terms of beverage sales, The Coca-Cola Company has the dominant position. (Coca-Cola Company pg. 3) c. Coca-Cola Company – Total Assets 2006 = $29,963, Total Assets 2007 $43,269 (Coca-Cola Company pg. 69). 43,269 – 29,963 = $13,306 / 29,963 = 44.4% increase PepsiCo inc. – Total Assets 2006 - $29,930, Total Assets 2007 $34,628 (PepsiCo inc. pg 62). 34,628 -29,930 = 4,698 / 29,930 = 15.7% increase d. Pepsi Co. depreciation and amortization - $1,426 (PepsiCo inc. pg 57). Coca-Cola Company depreciation and amortization - $1,163 (Coca-Cola Company pg. 68). I believe that Pepsi Co. has a higher depreciation and amortization expense is due to the higher amount of plant, property and equipment. Pepsi Co. has $11,228 (PepsiCo inc. pg 58) while Coca-Cola has $8,493 (Coca-Cola Company pg. 67). e. Both companies use consolidated statements of income, which is a condensed version of a multi-step format. There area subtle differences in them, Coca-Cola...
Words: 1295 - Pages: 6
...Analysis PepsiCo Strengths * Branding - One of PepsiCo’s top brands is of course Pepsi, one of the most recognized brands of the world, ranked according to Interbrand. As of 2008 it ranked 26th amongst top 100 global brands. Pepsi generates more than $15,000 million of annual sales. The strength of the Pepsi brand is evident in Pepsi’s presence in over 200 countries. The company has the largest market share in the US beverage at 39. Such brand dominance insures loyalty and repetitive sales which contributes to over $15 million in annual sales for the company * Distribution - The company delivers its products directly from manufacturing plants and warehouses to customer warehouses and retail stores. This is part of a three pronged approach which also includes employees making direct store deliveries of snacks and beverages and the use of third party distribution services. Weaknesses * * Overdependence on US Markets - Despite its international presence, 52% of its revenues originate in the US. This concentration does leave PepsiCo somewhat vulnerable to the impact of changing economic conditions, and labor strikes. Large US customers could exploit PepsiCo’s lack of bargaining power and negatively impact its revenues. * Low Productivity - In 2008 PepsiCo had approximately 198,000 employees. Its revenue per employee was $219,439, which was lower that its competitors. This may indicate comparatively low productivity on the part of PepsiCo employees...
Words: 776 - Pages: 4
...Driving Forces Behind PepsiCo The management team at PepsiCo is the driving force behind the company’s growth and community involvement. They focus on being responsible corporate citizens, performance with purpose. Their goal is to have financial success while leaving a positive impact on society. The approach to financial performance is simple, increase shareholder value. By focusing on social and environmental issues they are able to achieve both their mission and their vision. The mission statement for PepsiCo is: Our mission is to be the world’s premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employee, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity. (PepsiCo, 2013) The vision statement for PepsiCo is: PepsiCo’s responsibility is to continually improve all aspects of the world in which we operate – environment, social, economic – creating a better tomorrow than today. Our vision is put into action through programs and a focus on environmental stewardship, activities to benefit society, and a commitment to build shareholder value by making PepsiCo a truly sustainable company. (PepsiCo, 2013) Purpose of study. The purpose of this study is to determine what makes PepsiCo successful. The downfalls of PepsiCo management will also be discovered...
Words: 2607 - Pages: 11
...James D. Harris TUI UNIVERSITY Session Long Project- Module 1 Assignment MGT499 Dr. Jim Young February 17, 2012 Management: Strategic Vision, Value and Stakeholders The company that I have chosen to utilize during this class is PepsiCo. I mainly chose this company because my granddaughter loves their products especially the strawberry Tropicana Twister Soda and also because my nephew is an employee there and can give me more in depth knowledge about the company at the employee level. I can also find a lot of information about the company on their website, www.pepsico.com, to help with the assignments for this class. I am not particular about other soda products or brands as I am with PepsiCo so I feel I have a personal connection to the company as well. According to PepsiCo’s website their mission is considered a promise to their investors and it states, ‘Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity.” The vision that PepsiCo wants to convey is that it is all about improving the environment in every aspect. Their website mission statement also says, “Our vision is put into action through programs and a focus on environmental stewardship...
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
...PepsiCo – CocaCola Case Write-Up 11/09/15 Danny Blanks Ben Crook Will Dauterive Alberto Fernandez Zijian “Justus” Jia Case Questions Coke vs Pepsi 1) What is EVA? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using EVA as a measure of company performance? EVA stands for economic value added. EVA is a value based financial performance measure based on Net Operating Profit after Taxes, the invested capital required to generate that income, and the WACC. The primary advantage of EVA is that it provides a measure of wealth creation that aligns the goals of divisional or plant managers with the goals of the entire company. A primary disadvantage with EVA is that it struggles to control for size differences across organizational units compared to Return on Investment (ROI). Another disadvantage with EVA is that numbers can be easily altered or manipulated to boost EVA, therefore painting a better picture than what actually exist. EVA also places a large emphasis on producing immediate results, thereby creating a disincentive for management to invest in quality projects. 2) Please examine the historical performance of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo in terms of EVA. What trends do you observe? What are the factors behind those trends? What do you think are the key drivers of EVA? Through observing EVA for Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, we noticed a few things. First, Coca-Cola’s EVA seems to be more stable, but PepsiCo, which although was negative from 1994-1997...
Words: 1020 - Pages: 5
...Accounting Application Project - Part Seven Desiree’ Pressley September 12, 2015 MBA620: Accounting for Decision Makers Summary of the major capital investments made by PepsiCo and The Coca Cola Company In 2014, purchases of investments for The Coca Cola Company were $17,800 million and proceeds from disposals of investments were $12,986 million. This activity resulted in a net cash outflow of $4,814 million during 2014. The purchases during the year ended December 31, 2014 include The Coca Cola Company investment in Keurig, partially offset by the net purchases and proceeds of our short-term investments, that were made as part of the Company’s overall cash management strategy. In 2014, the Company’s acquisitions of businesses, equity method investments and nonmarketable securities totaled $389 million, which primarily included a joint investment with one of our bottling partners in a dairy company in Ecuador. None of the Company’s other acquisitions or investments were individually significant. (The Coca Cola Company, 2015) The Coca Cola Company purchases of property, plant and equipment net of disposals for the years ended December 31, 2014 is 2,406 million. In 2014, other investing activities were primarily related to loans to Fairlife, LLC, a value-added dairy joint venture, as well as local investments in Argentina. (The Coca Cola Company, 2015) To meet this growing demand, PepsiCo plans to continue to grow their portfolio of more nutritious products as well...
Words: 1415 - Pages: 6
...PepsiCo From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the company. For the soft drink, see Pepsi. PepsiCo Inc. | | Type | Public | Traded as | NYSE: PEP NASDAQ: PEP S&P 500 Component | Industry | Foods, Beverages | Founded | North Carolina, U.S. (1965 (1965)) | Founder(s) | Donald Kendall, Herman Lay | Headquarters | Purchase, New York, U.S. | Area served | Worldwide | Key people | Indra Nooyi (Chairman & CEO)[1] | Products | See list of PepsiCo products | Revenue | US$ 57.838 billion (2010)[2] | Operating income | US$ 08.332 billion (2010)[2] | Net income | US$ 06.338 billion (2010)[2] | Total assets | US$ 68.153 billion (2010)[2] | Total equity | US$ 21.476 billion (2010)[2] | Employees | 294,000 (2010)[2] | Divisions | PepsiCo Americas Foods; PepsiCo Americas Beverages; PepsiCo Europe; PepsiCo Asia, Middle East & Africa | Subsidiaries | List of subsidiaries | Website | PepsiCo.com | PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP) is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Purchase, New York, United States, with interests in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. PepsiCo was formed in 1965 with the merger of the Pepsi-Cola Company and Frito-Lay, Inc. PepsiCo has since expanded from its namesake product Pepsi to a broader range of food and beverage brands, the largest of which include an acquisition of Tropicana in 1998...
Words: 5294 - Pages: 22
...Factual Summary： Frito-Lay, Inc. is a division of PepsiCo, Inc., a New York-based diversified consumer goods and services firm. PepsiCo, Inc. includes Pizza Hut, Inc., Taco Bell Corporation, Pepsi-Cola Company, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and PepsiCo foods international. PepsiCo, Inc. recorded net income of $ 1.077 billion on net sales of $ 17.8 billion in 1990. Frito-Lay, Inc is a worldwide leader in the manufacturing and marketing of snack chips. In 1960, the Frito Company and the H.W. Lay Company merged to become Frito-Lay, Inc. The company is the leading manufacturer of snack chips in the United States, capturing about 50% of the retail sales in this category. During 1990, the company has 39 manufacturing plants, more than 1,600 distribution facilities, and a 10,000-person route-sales team that calls on more than 400,000 retail store customers in the United States. Today, Frito-Lay brands account for 59% of the U.S. snack chip industry. Sun Chips Multigrain Snacks resulted from Frito-Lay’s ongoing marketing research and product development program. In the early 1970s, corporate marketing research indicated that consumers were looking for nutritious snacks. In the early 1980s, Frito-Lay marketing R&D instituted the “Harvest” project with the multigrain snack to appeal to consumers. The “Harvest” project also emphasizes on flavor line extension and low-fat versions. In the beginning, Frito-Lay faced some problems for increasing its sales volumes. Later, Frito-Lay uses different...
Words: 267 - Pages: 2
...Introduction The purpose of this case analysis report is to review the history and financial reports for PepsiCo to determine whether or not the merger with Quaker Oats is a good project. The analysis in this report will provide key insights into what the company does and if/how the merger with Quaker can benefit PepsiCo. Company Overview The first Pepsi-Cola company was founded in 1902 by a young pharmacist from North Carolina, Caleb D. Bradham. After initial struggles with bankruptcy, the company again emerged in 1934, under new ownership and with better fortunes. Even though this year was in the middle of the Great Depression, sales soared and the company embarked on six decades of sustained and profitable growth. In 1965, Pepsi-Cola merged with the Texas-based snack manufacturer, Frito-Lay, Inc. The company, now called PepsiCo continued to grow during the 1970s and 80s through acquisitions of other companies. In 1984, the company underwent some restructuring efforts to re-focus on soft drinks, snacks, and restaurants. PepsiCo, incorporated on November 13, 1986, is a global food and beverage company. By 1995, PepsiCo sales had reached $30B, and it had 470,000 employees worldwide. Historically, it has been one of the most successful consumer products companies in the world. Between 1988 and 1994, PepsiCo had invested close to $7B to acquire thousands of fast-food and casual dining outlets. The company was investing “too much money too fast” and operational complexities were...
Words: 990 - Pages: 4
...PepsiCo 2005 Case Analysis June 17, 2009 I. Definition of the Issue The PepsiCo-2005 case study has several issues revolving it. It has the internal issue that PepsiCo has not been able to consistently meet its growth goal of 15+ percent annual increase in earnings for the last 10 years. Its external issues consist of its products as reaching maturity stage industry wise and its divisions, except Frito-Lay North America (FLNA), fail to rank highest in its respective market segments. Division wise, the company holds a large share of each respective market, but over-all the company sustains a flat growth rate and fails to meet its growth goal. In respect to this, it can be seen that the real issue in this case is the need of a strategy to sustain a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in earnings per share of 15 percent per year. This paper aims to develop a three-year strategic plan for PEPSICO that can best ensure this growth through this decade. II. Objectives The paper’s objectives include designing of alternatives that may aid its development for a sound strategy in response to the issue through a quantitative analysis. The paper would also include an analysis of each alternative. From the generated alternatives, the paper would focus on one that would seem to best apply to the given circumstances. The paper also includes a potential problem analysis to aid in strengthening the strategy’s defenses and enables the company to predict and anticipate...
Words: 1829 - Pages: 8
...EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the case study, PepsiCo is a producer of carbonated cola drink and was marketing its products in most countries around the world. PepsiCo’s competitor was Coca-Cola. PepsiCo made two acquisitions of Tropicana and Quaker and the view was that there was synergy and economies of scale to be gained. PepsiCo should have had an organisational structure that will enable the achievement of the organisational mission and objectives. The organisation reorganised their structure to a multidivisional structure in a move to exploit the full acquisition potential. A multidivisional structure is most suitable for an organisation that has not got a wide range of products like PepsiCo. The organisation did not experience benefits from the multidivisional structure because PepsiCo had a wide rage of products and different customers. The organisation was structured into divisions and each reporting to the headquarters and there was no synergies and economies of scale gained. PepsiCo revised the organisational structure to a matrix structure. It enabled the organisation to operate in its particular competitive situation at peak effectiveness. At Pepsi they discovered that it was essential to drive the various brands as part of one team. There was less conflict between employees because of the hierarchical setup of the organisation. PepsiCo Beverages became the No 1 liquid refreshment beverage company in measured channels. There was a strategic fit as its strengths in the...
Words: 2510 - Pages: 11
