Premium Essay

Response To Gilbert Ryle's Descartes Myth

Submitted By
Words 1173
Pages 5
In “Descartes’ Myth” by Gilbert Ryle, the author proposes an argument against Descartes’ theory of dualism. Throughout the piece, Ryle states that the “official doctrine” of dualism is a mind-body separation where consciousness and physicality are completely two disjointed entities (Ryle 364). He further explains this by emphasizing the fact that mental substances cannot be quantified with a numerical value such as density or weight. Also, one’s consciousness and mind cannot be located in space or seen by other individuals since it entirely exclusive to the self. On the other hand, the body is defined as a physical substance which is governed by mechanical laws, composed of matter, and can be observed in the external world as a “public affair” …show more content…
Despite the fact that the composition of the brain is made up of atoms and obeys physical laws, I hypothesize that the processes that occur within them cannot be justified with current scientific theories. If I were to clearly define my stance on metaphysicalism, I would personally be a dualist. Consciousness cannot physically be measured by weight, abundance, or density. It is not something that we can simply quantify or label with a numerical value. Instead, it seems more likely to address it by it being present in an object or not in a categorical way. It becomes difficult to study and make conclusions about consciousness because as Ryle said, it is secretive and personal to an individual. So, it limits our possibilities by confining us to our secluded minds that only we have access to. Science does indeed provide factual justification for how our mental processes occur through synaptic impulses, neurotransmitters, and hormones. However, scientific laws can only explain the functionality of these occurrences rather than providing evidence for why these things happen and where it is derived from. Like Chalmers, I can agree that there must be more research and more analysis done in order to formulate an inclusive conclusion. As of now, I can speculate that the mind and body are completely separate from one another due to differing properties, but still remain in contact with each other through

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Good Life

...mTELECOURSE STUDY GUIDE FOR The Examined Life FOURTH EDITION author J. P. White Chair, Department of Philosophy Santa Barbara City College contributing author Manuel Velasquez Professor of Philosophy Santa Clara University This Telecourse Study Guide for The Examined Life is part of a collegelevel introduction to philosophy telecourse developed in conjunction with the video series The Examined Life, and the text Philosophy: A Text with Readings, tenth edition, by Manuel Velasquez, The Charles Dirksen Professor, Santa Clara University. The television series The Examined Life was designed and produced by INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications, Netherlands Educational Broadcasting Corporation (TELEAC/NOT), and Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company (UR) Copyright © 2007, 2005, 2002, 1999 by INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of INTELECOM Intelligent Telecommunications, 150 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 300, Pasadena, California 91105-1937. ISBN: 0-495-10302-0 Contents Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Lesson One — What is Philosophy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

Words: 78103 - Pages: 313

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Design

...Philosophy and Design Pieter E. Vermaas • Peter Kroes Andrew Light • Steven A. Moore Philosophy and Design From Engineering to Architecture Pieter E. Vermaas Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Andrew Light University of Washington Seattle USA Peter Kroes Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Steven A. Moore University of Texas Austin USA ISBN 978-1-4020-6590-3 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6591-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007937486 © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Contents List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design in Engineering and Architecture: Towards an Integrated Philosophical Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Kroes, Andrew Light, Steven A. Moore, and Pieter E. Vermaas Part I Engineering Design ix 1 Design, Use, and the Physical and Intentional Aspects of Technical Artifacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

Words: 165744 - Pages: 663