Free Essay

The Altria Group

In:

Submitted By hockeygirl
Words 1426
Pages 6
The Altria Group, Inc.
Often referred to as “the house the Marlboro Man built”, The Altria Group, Inc. is the world’s largest tobacco company. Altria operates its cigarette business through the companies known as Phillip Morris USA and Philip Morris International, both of which sell Marlboro – the world’s largest selling cigarette brand since 1972 (“The Altria Group,” n.d.). This company controls about half of the US tobacco market. This is also the parent company of Kraft Foods. I chose to do a paper on this particular company because of the practices of lies and deceit that it has followed for many years.
Some of the behaviors that I find socially and ethically irresponsible are that the company continually down plays the addictiveness and severe risk to health that their product can cause. Over the years the company has been under scrutiny for many different things including the practice of employing under age children to hand out cigarettes, falsifying legal and medical documents, and the paying off of political and legal leaders to accomplish the things that it wants done. This corporation has also been listed in the Wall Street Journal as Number 1 in a list of the top 10 worst places for a woman to work because of the fact that there are no women in any upper management positions and they employ nearly 75,000 people in the Philip Morris US plant alone (“Unethical Companies,” n.d.).
At the annual shareholders meeting in 2011, Philip Morris International celebrated a year of growth in spite of the world’s economic crisis. What they failed to mention, however, was the true cost of their profitability. Tobacco kills one person every six seconds. On the average, smokers lose 15 years of life. Tobacco use is leading to higher healthcare costs and lost productivity. Tobacco causes a $500 billion economic drain that is the equivalent to $74 for each person in the world. For every dollar that Philip Morris International made in 2011, health care expenses and lost productivity cost the world’s economy $7.39 (“Challenging Big Tobacco,” 2011). In spite of these astonishing figures, The Altris Group has a history of denying the harmful effects of tobacco. In an interview with Dr. David Kessler, the former Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, the public learned how the Philip Morris corporation deceived them. During an investigation by the FDA to determine whether or not nicotine should be considered a drug, Dr. Kessler and his colleagues uncovered some awful truths that were hidden from the public. The company claimed that nicotine was not addictive and that nicotine was not a drug. What they found was nearly 30 years of research by the company stating otherwise. There was research by the company that included such things as how fast it took the brain to receive the effects of the nicotine. It went so far as to determine the actual receptors of the central nervous system that were affected. The tobacco company knew for years before the Surgeon General’s warning in 1964 that this was a highly potent drug, and they hid it so that it could not be regulated by the FDA. The research that was being done by Kessler went on for several years. During his investigation, Dr. Kessler also found out that the tobacco company was creating a hybrid version of the tobacco plant that was highly addictive. This plant was bred specifically for people to become more addicted. This plant was so secret that it was only grown in Brazil so that our Government was not aware of it. Publicly the tobacco company denied altering any of the chemicals in the tobacco and said that they added nothing to it. As the investigation continued, they also found out that they were advertising different cigarettes as “light” version of the product. When they took these samples to the laboratory, they found the opposite to be true. The “light” cigarettes actually contained higher levels of nicotine than the regular cigarettes. This happened on purpose and he began to investigate every aspect of the tobacco industry. The bottom line during the investigation is that they found out that Phillip Morris lied about what they knew to defraud the United States Government.
In 2009, a three judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals supported an earlier decision from a lower court ruling that the cigarette maker had lied to the public in a 50 year conspiracy to defraud the consumer about the health risks of smoking. The court also ordered that the company must publish a corrective statement on the adverse health effects and the addictiveness of smoking and nicotine. They were also order to stop using misleading labels like “low tar”’ “light”, and “mild” since these products are now known to be no safer and less harmful than regular cigarettes and are quite possibly more harmful (“United States vs. Philip Morris,” n.d.).
The tobacco company knows that people wouldn’t buy their products if they told the truth, so they spend more than $13.3 billion dollars a year on deceptive advertising and marketing. This advertising is often targeted specifically to children and young adults. The tobacco industry addicts more than 1000 youth every day. One in three of these children will die prematurely because of tobacco use. As a 1981 Philip Morris marketing report noted, “Today’s teenager is tomorrow’s potential customer” (The FDA Moves to Crack Down,” 2012).
Not only does Philip Morris target children to become addicted to this product, they also employ children in countries where there are no labor laws. In an investigation by Human Rights Watch, it was revealed that there 72 cases of children as young as 10 working very long days in the tobacco fields. This is a job that poses serious health risk, especially to children. Nicotine absorbed through the skin from the handling of the tobacco leaves is the equivalent to smoking 36 cigarettes. These children are also exposed to fertilizer and pesticides (“Unethical Companies,” n.d.).
Amongst the other irresponsible things that Philip Morris is guilty of, they are also guilty of paying off government and public officials. In one case, the Illinois Supreme Court threw out a $10.1 billion dollar lawsuit against Philip Morris and the Altria Group saying that it did not mislead consumers when advertising “light” cigarettes. The Chicago Tribune reported that Philip Morris lawyers contributed $16,800 to help elect the judge that threw out the verdict (“Big Tobacco Spends,” 2012).
Philip Morris is guilty of fraud, negligence, and product liability. This company has murdered people for over 50 years. The have known since the early 1950’s that they had a product that was addictive people and killing them. They continued to sell it and to market it, even to children. They also covered it up and lied for decades. This company should be held responsible for the roughly 100 million people that it has killed since it found out about the harmful effects of its product.

References
A decade of influence. Tobacco money in california politics. (n.d.). Retrieved from The American Lung Association website: http://www.center4tobaccopolicy.org/CTPO/_files/_file/ A%20Decade%20of%20Influence.pdf
The Altria Group. (n.d.). Altria Group Inc. Retrieved from Bloomber Business week website: http://bx.businessweek.com/altria-group/news/
Big tobacco spends $12 million to spread big lies. (2012, March 1). Retrieved from The american cancer society proposition 29 website: http://www.californiansforacure.org/news/news/308?1=1 Chester, C., & Kellett, G. (2011, May 11). Challenging Big Tobacco. Is Philip
Morris Internatinal grasping at straws. Retrieved from Corporate
Accountability International website: http://www.stopcorporateabuse.org/ release-report-philip-morris-international-grasping-straws Dr. David Kessler [biography]. (n.d.). Retrieved from AEI Speaker Bureau website: http://www.aeispeakers.com/speakerbio.php?SpeakerID=558
Interview with Dr. David Kessler. (n.d.). Inside the Tobacco deal. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/settlement/interviews/ kessler.html database.
Public Health Law. (n.d.). United States v. Philip Morris (D.O.J. Lawsuit).
Retrieved from William Mitchell College of Law website: http://publichealthlawcenter.org/topics/tobacco-control/ tobacco-control-litigation/united-states-v-philip-morris-doj-lawsuit
The FDA moves to crack down on big tobacco deceiving consumers [press release].
(2012, March 30). Retrieved from The American Lung Association website: http://www.lung.org/press-room/press-releases/ fda-moves-to-crack-down-on-tobacco-ads.html
Unethical companies. (n.d.). Unethical Companies. Retrieved from
http://www.actionforourplanet.com/#/top-10-unethical-companies/4545796858

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Financial Analysis

...Brief company profiles Google (stock code: GOOG) Google Inc. (Google), incorporated on October 22, 2002, is a global technology company. The Company’s business is primarily focused around key areas, such as search, advertising, operating systems and platforms, enterprise and hardware products. The Company generates revenue primarily by delivering online advertising. The Company also generates revenues from Motorola by selling hardware products. The Company provides its products and services in more than 100 languages and in more than 50 countries, regions, and territories. Effective September 16, 2013, Google Inc acquired Bump Technologies Inc. Effective October 22, 2013, Google Inc acquired FlexyCore, a developer of software. Effective December 6, 2013, Google Inc acquired the entire share capital of SCHAFT Inc. Effective December 14, 2013, Google Inc acquired Boston Dynamics Inc. Effective January 15, 2014, Google Inc acquired Impermium Corp, a developer of SaaS application software. Effective February 7, 2014, Google Inc acquired the remaining 88% interest in Nest Labs Inc. Effective February 21, 2014, Google Inc acquired Spider.io, a provider of online fraud detection services. Effective March 12, 2014, Google Inc acquired Green Throttle Games. In April 2014, Google Inc acquired Titan Aerospace, a Moriarty-based manufacturer of solar-powered drones. Effective May 5, 2014, the Company acquired Rangespan, a provider of information technology services. Effective May 6, 2014...

Words: 1393 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Mkt Project

...now on smokers will have to ask for "Marlboro Golds."Corporations do not change iconic brands lightly. In this case cigarette manufacturer Altria Group (MO) had no choice. The Food & Drug Administration, which as of last year regulates tobacco products, banned the use of the words "mild," "light," or "low tar" on packages effective on June 22. The agency says such cigarettes are just as harmful as regular ones. Before Altria made the switch, it used the old packs to tell smokers that while the look of Marlboro Lights would change, the "cigarette stays the same." That got the FDA's attention. The agency argues many consumers will continue to assume Marlboro Golds are safer than regular smokes and has ordered Altria to hand over market research showing why it used the tactic. "What we're concerned about is that it is potentially perpetuating this untruth that these products are somehow less harmful," says Dr. Lawrence R. Deyton, the agency's top tobacco regulator. Altria spokesman Bill Phelps says the company will cooperate with the agency. Pharmaceutical companies frequently skirmish with the FDA, and Big Tobacco is widely expected to do the same. Altria was the only cigarette maker to support FDA oversight, says Phelps, because it wanted consistent rules of the game for the entire tobacco industry. Still, this is the second time Altria has clashed with federal regulators in recent months. In March it challenged the membership of an FDA tobacco science panel studying the health...

Words: 644 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Business

...2012, for Tom LeNeau’s B233/MAN2021 Section 05 Principles of Management course. This summary will discuss the information that team 3 has retrieved from annual report of Philip Morris International. The annual reports we obtained shows the management changes and how the four functions of management have improved the operational efficiencies of Philip Morris International. All of the information in this summary, will be interesting to management students and managers. On March 28, 2008, Louis C. Camilleri became the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Philip Morris International. This happened following the spin-off of Philip Morris International from Altria Group, Inc. prior to this, he had been the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of Altria Group Inc., since 2002. He had previously served as Altria Group Inc.’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 1996. Camilleri joined Philip Morris Inc. in 1978 as a Business Development Analyst with Philip Morris Europe. Prior to joining Philip Morris International Inc., Camilleri was a Business Analyst with W. R. Grace & Co., in Lausanne, Switzerland. Louis received a degree in Economics and Business Administration from Lausanne University in 1976 (Philip Morris International, 2002-2012). Louis C. Camilleri is a person of significance to use for this project; he is the Chief Executive Officer of Philip Morris International and has held other various positions in Philip Morris International...

Words: 839 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Management Paper

... the planning function of management. These factors are often broad and can include issues such as ethics, legality, and social responsibility. The Altria Group, Inc. is a company that is often criticized for ethical and social issues, and these factors have a great deal impact on organizational planning. Previously known as The Phillip Morris Companies, Altria Group Inc. produces a wide variety of tobacco, beer, and food products. “Altria sells some of the world’s most successful and best-known packaged goods. Altria’s Philip Morris divisions make several leading cigarette brands and other tobacco products in the United States and internationally. The Philip Morris USA division is the nation’s leading cigarette manufacturer. Altria’s food division, Kraft Foods, Inc., produces a variety of popular cereals, prepared foods, and beverages. Altria is also the major shareholder in SABMiller plc, formerly known as the Miller Brewing Co., which makes some of the best-selling beers in the United States and in the world. Altria is located in New York City. The cigarette brands produced by the Philip Morris divisions include Marlboro, Virginia Slims, Chesterfield, and Basic. Kraft Foods is one of the world’s largest food companies. Its brands include Kraft, Maxwell House, Oreo, and Oscar Mayer” (Microsoft® Student 2008 [DVD], 2007). Altria has had some highs and...

Words: 1081 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Human Resource and Job Design

...the rent, royalties, and fees paid by the franchisees, as well as sales in company-operated restaurants. In 2012, the company had annual revenues of $27.5 billion and profits of $5.5 billion. According to a 2012 BBC report, McDonald's is the world's d1.5 million of whom work for franchises. McDonald's primarily sells hamburgers, cheeseburgers, chicken, French fries, breakfast items, soft drinks, milkshakes, and desserts. In response to changing consumer tastes, the company has expanded its menu to include salads, fish, wraps, smoothies, fruit, and seasoned fries. Marlboro Marlboro is the best selling brand of cigarettes in the world. It is made by Philip Morris USA (a branch of Altria) within the United States, and by Philip Morris International (now separate from Altria) outside the United States. It is well known for its billboard advertisements, magazine ads of the Marlboro Man, and its long associated history in the sponsorship of motorsport. Richmond, Virginia, is the location of the largest Marlboro cigarette manufacturing plant. 2. Furthermore we will discuss about the layout decisions from both of the companies,...

Words: 1637 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Management 320 Essay

...Businesses can potentially influence the structure of government, societal values and cultural trends. Due to this, there is great controversy about how business power and operations impact our current values and ideals. Epitomizing this concept in a more specific sense is the potentially harmful marketing and promotional practices of companies. Many large businesses utilize their influential power through marketing; emulating and glamorizing harmful lifestyles and messages to children and young adults alike. Multiple viewpoints from powerful companies and various theories such as Market Capitalism, Dominance Model, Deontology, and Consequentialism will be used to analyze the economic, social, and moral implications of this issue. McDonald’s, Altria Group, and Urban Outfitters embody the idea of corporate business power trickling into our everyday culture. While these companies operate on different business models, and sell different products, they share the commonality of promoting potentially...

Words: 3126 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Case

...regarding Kraft and advertising to children. Wartella characterized Kraft's online marketing as "indefensible" and concluded that Kraft's claim that it was not advertising to children under the age of six was "at best disingenuous and at worst a downright lie."1 The executives in the room were visibly shaken by her comments. In late 2003, Kraft formed the Worldwide Health & Wellness Advisory Council, comprising 10 nutritionists and media experts, including Wartella, to investigate allegations that Kraft had been knowingly advertising unhealthy foods and to help address the rise in obesity, among other health issues. The pressure for Kraft to review its advertising policies came amidst increasing criticism from congressional panels, parent groups and other concerned citizens, that food corporations, such as Kraft Foods and McDonald's Corporation, have been knowingly targeting young children (up to age 12) in their advertising campaigns. The concern surrounding childhood obesity stems from statistics showing a 200 percent increase in childhood obesity since the 1980s. Between the 1960s and the 1980s, the percentage of overweight children hovered around 6 percent, but in the last two decades, this rate has leapt to 16 percent. 3 Despite this, Kraft decided to keep marketing to children under 12. One Kraft executive admitted, "We didn't want to give up the power of marketing to kids."4 This "power" is villainizing the company, however. Currently, Kraft is a trusted brand, but that reputation...

Words: 4252 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Porters

...and local brands. The companys primary international brands include Marlboro, L&M, Philip Morris, Chesterfield, Parliament, Lark, and Virginia Slims. Philip Morris International operates in the European Union, the Middle East and Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Its local brands principally include Bond Street in eastern Europe; Red & White in central Europe; A Hijau, A Mild, and Dji Sam Soe in Indonesia; Diana in Italy; Optima and Apollo‐Soyuz in Russia; Morven Gold in Pakistan; Boston in Colombia; Best and Classic in Serbia; f6 in Germany; Delicados in Mexico; Assos in Greece; and Petra in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The company is based in New York, New York. Philip Morris International, Inc. operates independently of Altria Group, Inc., as of March 28, 2008. PRODUCT MIX We have the industry's strongest and most diverse brand portfolio, led by Marlboro, the world’s number one selling brand and L&M, the fourth most popular brand. This portfolio includes a variety of blends and styles, across 150 distinct brands and over 1,900 variants. In fact, 7 of the top 15 brands in the world are ours. * MARLBORO Marlboro is the world’s leading cigarette brand, outselling the closest competitors by almost three times. In 2007, Marlboro’s volume outstripped the combined volume of the four major brands belonging to each of our biggest competitors. * L&M L&M originated in the USA in 1953. It is now the fourth most popular cigarette brand worldwide...

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Whistler Corp. Case

...Running head: MARKETING KILLER PRODUCT Marketing Killer Product Blake E. Lance Lubbock Christian University Tobacco is a nasty, horrible, addictive drug in any form or fashion. I feel that it is one of the leading drugs in America and it is legal. Legal or not there is to many American's addicted to tobacco, whether you chew it, or smoke it. If it was illegal people would farm it, sell it, just like any other drug in America, believe the government legalized it just to be able to tax the tobacco and gain a very large profit off of it. The government raises the prices as if the drug addicted people are going to quit, its just more money in uncle sam's pocket, knowing that the people are addicted to tobacco. Tobacco company's will never stop selling tobacco because they know that there is to many people addicted to it and if they did not sell it, there competitor will and why loose out on all that money. Even tho, predictions are that one billion people world wide will die this century from smoking related ailments, (Armstrong/Kotler 11th edition p. 34.) Its legal and the tobacco company's know there is a very high demand for the product. There may be a few of the big bosses in these big tobacco company's have a little conscience and moral fiber in themselves but the big almighty dollars stands in their way. Therefore I think it will never stop the money is to good and there is way to many American's and foreign people addicted to it. Cigarette marketers will continue...

Words: 756 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Type

...Strengths * One of largest tobacco companies worldwide * Key note product/brand * Substantial cash growth * Phillip Morris SWOT Analysis Phillip Morris SWOT Analysis Revenue Distributed in Important Areas * Excellent employee morale | Weaknesses * Key note product/brand unhealthy * Substantial cash growth obtained at the risk of human health * Social perception of product has negative effect on company image * Taxation & Regulation | Opportunities * Smokeless tobacco * Acquiring company for tobacco quitting aids | Threats * Laws prohibiting tobacco use * Competitors * Lawsuits | Strengths With any company, it is imperative that upper management is able to identify the strengths and weaknesses that are within the company. Having knowledge of this would allow those in controlling positions to stay abreast on the competition and to strengthen those weakened areas. When Mr. Phillip Morris established the Phillip Morris Company in 1847, he probably would not have imagined that one of the major strengths of the company after over a century, in this present day, is one of the largest tobacco companies worldwide (Phillip Morris International, 2015). In 1924, the company began to manufacture its famous brand known as Marlboro in Richmond, Virginia, a plant that still remains standing until this day (Phillip Morris International, 2015, para 4). It is just as important that the company introduces a product that would yield the revenue to sustain...

Words: 1079 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Punitive Damages

...Harry Fryman 11/14/2012 BUSINESS LAW I, SECTION 321A Evaluating Punitive Damages America’s society operates in a way in which crimes and torts are inevitable. The means in which society assimilates this nature is through the use of our legal system. It is commonly known that in civil litigation, the purpose punitive of damages is to punish the tortfeasor and to prevent him or her from performing such conduct. Punitive damages are to be paid by the tortfeasor to the victim. Aspects of punitive damages can vary from state to state, such as the amounts in which the tortfeasor owes to the victim. The purpose of punitive damages may be just in nature, it is however susceptible to exploitation and deception through instigation and other means by the victim. The notion of exploitation and deception in society is not just at all, it is in fact the source of corruption. In order to avoid corruption in society, it would be best to remove the source of this corruption, by altering the law in which the victim does not receive punitive damages. According to Victor E Schwartz, “In their origins, punitive damages were a helpful auxiliary to state criminal Law.” The very nature of punitive damages appears to be an incomplete method of judging as it may punish the guilty at hand; it also fails to recycle the damage in a proper manner. The first issue at hand with punitive damages being rewarded to the victim of a certain case is figuring out how much is being rewarded. Drastic...

Words: 1194 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

British American Tobacco Plc

...Corporate Reporting | | British American Tobacco was founded in 1902 and just 10 years after incorporation it was one of the world’s top 12 companies in terms of market capitalization. The group is the world’s second largest stock market listed tobacco group. With products being sold in over 180 markets worldwide, they have market leadership in over 50 markets. They have had a significant global occupancy in over a century and in 2011 alone, its subsidiaries had a sale of 705 billion cigarettes. They have 46 cigarette factories spread over 39 countries. (British American Tobacco, 2012) They employ a workforce of over 55,000 people worldwide. They work internationally with thousands of farmers, securing 70% of their raw material directly from farmers.. They have the most vertically integrated supply chain in the tobacco industry.(British American Tobacco, 2012) In 2011, the group agreed to purchase privately-owned Protabaco, the second largest cigarette company in Colombia. The deal was worth US$452 million and was internally financed. The group also set up a new company called Nicoventures, to develop and test alternative nicotine products. (The Financial Times, 2011) In December 2012, British American Tobacco acquired CN Creative, a UK-based start-up which specializes in the development of ecigarettes, for an undisclosed sum. (The Financial Times, 2012) Tobacco Industry: Tobacco companies have to deal with a highly competitive marketplace and despite the adversity...

Words: 2966 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Analitical Analysis on British American Tobacco

...BUS 101 PROJECT SUBMITTED TO : NOOR-E-HASNIN SECTION: 06 SUBMITTED BY : 1. RUSHMIAN ANNOY WADUD (1410221643) 2. SERAJUS SALEHIN (1511397630) 3. HASAN MUSTAFA TARIQUE (1510270630) 4. FARHAN HASAN (1510199630) 5. MD. ARIFUL ISLAM (1230423026) Acknowledgment We owe our profound gratitude to our course instructor Ms. Noor-E-Hasnin (NEH), who took keen interest on our project work and guided us all along, till the completion of our project work by providing all the necessary information for developing a complete analytical report. We thank her for her sincere guidance, supervision and encouragement throughout the course. Table of Contents Introduction _______________________________________________________________ 6 Literature Review Company Background _______________________________________________________ 7 Company Mission and Vision __________________________________________________ 8 Organization Chart ___________________________________________________________ 9 How the Business was formed Articles and By Laws of Corporation ____________________________________________ 10_ Advantages and Disadvantages of Business _______________________________________ 12 Detains of number and types of product __________________________________________ 15 Industry Analysis Major Competitors __________________________________________________________ 17 SWOT Analysis ____________________________________________________________ 19 Conclusion...

Words: 3067 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Kraft Genral Food

...Kraft General Foods: The Merger Issues: Following are the issues found in KGF: * General foods were unionized but Kraft foods were not unionized. (The PR and employees policies face problems because of this issue.) * Integrating issues in Kraft and General Foods. (Human resource issues and employees expertise) * Kraft management was dominant. (The executives of Kraft Foods were more involved.) * Increase in price brought decline in volumes: (Increase in prices of some products decreased volumes of sales.) Analysis: General Foods was unionized but Kraft Foods was not unionized: Employees of General Foods formed unions but the Kraft Foods’ employees were non-union. Labor relations in both companies were positive but divergent because of history and policies. Managers at Kraft foods always take the complaints of the employees seriously and encouraged workers to bring grievances to higher level. Most workers of Kraft voted against unions. Both companies maintained different negotiating philosophies in dealing with workers. Integrating issues in Kraft and General Foods: The cultural differences between both organizations were an issue in the integration of KGF. There was a difference in the Human resource of the both companies. Employees of both organizations were expert in their own fields. Salaries in General Foods were 20-25 percent higher than Kraft foods. A committee was formed by the Philip Morris to resolve the issues of integration, the committee focused on the...

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Kraft Foods

...Kraft Foods Dr. Ramble Zompler MGT 599, Module 5 Case June 8, 2013 Kraft Foods Executive Summary Kraft Foods Company, which has been studied in the previous papers, is the largest North American Company providing packaged food and beverages and one of the largest global companies that offer consumer packaged foods. Kraft manufactures and markets products that include coffee, cheese, refrigerated meals, beverages, and other grocery products (SEC Filings). It has invented more food than any other company and can be traced back as far as 1765 (Bellis, 2013). The company is split into two operating divisions, Kraft Foods North America and Kraft Foods International. All the brands and products sold by Kraft today were largely brought together by Philip Morris, which is a merger of Kraft, Inc., General Mills, and Nabisco. 16.1 percent of the shares are public, while Morris retained the remaining shares (Kraft Foods Inc., 2012). Kraft business focuses on snacks, beverages, cheese, grocery items, and convenient packaged meals. Some of the most well-known brands come from Kraft such as Kraft Cheese, Oscar Meyer, and Maxwell House (Chapman & D'Innocenzio, 2013). This study describes Kraft Foods Group’s organizational design, key strategic control systems, primary human resources concerns, and cultural factors, and the effect that these have had on the implementation of the company’s strategy. This study also evaluates the fit or the lack of fit between Kraft’s...

Words: 1790 - Pages: 8