...The death penalty has been used as a punishment of execution throughout long periods of time. Through those periods, the penalty has now become a necessary part of the society and government system, as an imperative way to prevent dangerous crimes. Yet subsequently, society has become to question this deterrent, regarding humanistic ideas and its certainty. Much inquiry and debate arise from the thought of executing a person due to crime. This controversy created a worldwide dispute regarding the laws of this penalty. Nations like China, Iran, North Korea, Yemen, and the US are still using this deterrent. Whereas nations like France, Germany, Mexico, Canada, United Kingdom, and New Zealand have completely abolished the death penalty. However, there are still many other nations with this legislation and thus; this essay will prove to show why this capital punishment should be abolished and no longer used....
Words: 777 - Pages: 4
...Capital punishment has always been in debate across the globe for ages now, sometimes in my own head. In the real world, there are pro group and against group always trying to prove each other wrong, or maybe in this case, prove themselves right, much (un)like the prosecution and defense. I always wonder what goes into sentencing of a perpetrator or like the defense would like to call ‘a defendant’ (by the law of ‘innocent until proven guilty’)? More often than not, or from my little knowledge, I believe that capital punishment is mostly reserved for those involved in murder or serious threat to life, which is understandable. No one has the right to take another man’s life, or woman’s. But how does a judge, or a...
Words: 1650 - Pages: 7
...it so you could only be hanged for murder. The first recorded death penalty that took place was in 1608, it was Captain George Kendall. This execution took place in the new colonies, he was put to death because he was suspected of spying for Spain he was executed by a firing squad. Capital Punishment has not been proven to deter crime and opens the possibility of executing innocent people; finally, the Death Penalty/Capital Punishment can cause 2nd hand trauma to the victim and their family. Capital Punishment violates the 8th amendment, it is labeled as cruel and unusual punishment. Capital punishment also violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection,...
Words: 1359 - Pages: 6
...Cons of Capital Punishment Capital punishment has been around for years and the debate whether it is moral and justified is always being addressed. Most people can agree that one is either for or against the death penalty. This section of the paper will present arguments supporting the view that an “eye for an eye” is not a valid method of obtaining justice for crimes committed. Is it our job to decide who gets to live and die, and more importantly, is something as severe even evident through written laws? Here are some of the cons why capital punishment should be abolished from our civilization. Playing God ? First off, is it our duty as civilians, or humans for that matter, to play the role of God? I believe that death is a natural occurrence that is not something we can chose for another human being. Why should we kill someone who killed someone to show them that killing is a faulty comparison? It just seems for hypocritical to me to think that someone can say don’t do that, but then go on and do the same thing. There are alternatives to killing someone as a form of punishment and that is something that is a greater lesson to teach the criminal and have them live the rest of their life knowing what they did and the consequences for that crime. Some people, not all, have even been deemed innocent many years down the road when some real hard evidence proves their innocence. Now tell me if killing someone was worth it? To know that you didn’t believe an innocent...
Words: 835 - Pages: 4
...Cons of Capital Punishment Capital punishment has been around for years and the debate whether it is moral and justified is always being addressed. Most people can agree that one is either for or against the death penalty. This section of the paper will present arguments supporting the view that an “eye for an eye” is not a valid method of obtaining justice for crimes committed. Is it our job to decide who gets to live and die, and more importantly, is something as severe even evident through written laws? Here are some of the cons why capital punishment should be abolished from our civilization. Playing God ? First off, is it our duty as civilians, or humans for that matter, to play the role of God? I believe that death is a natural occurrence that is not something we can chose for another human being. Why should we kill someone who killed someone to show them that killing is a faulty comparison? It just seems for hypocritical to me to think that someone can say don’t do that, but then go on and do the same thing. There are alternatives to killing someone as a form of punishment and that is something that is a greater lesson to teach the criminal and have them live the rest of their life knowing what they did and the consequences for that crime. Some people, not all, have even been deemed innocent many years down the road when some real hard evidence proves their innocence. Now tell me if killing someone was worth it? To know that you didn’t believe an innocent...
Words: 835 - Pages: 4
...PHI 115 December 13, 2011 Capital punishment is the death penalty; it has been in use since ancient times to punish a selection of crimes. The Bible even promotes death for murder and other offenses like kidnapping. Often we hear the Bible quoted as a justification for capital punishment: “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth” (from Leviticus 24:20; also Exodus 21:24). This follows a more direct passage: “Whoever takes the life of any human being shall be put to death” (Leviticus 24:17). When the term death penalty is said, it makes screaming and shouting from both sides of activists. There are numerous arguments that are for and against capital punishment. One side of the argument might say it is justice served, while the other side might say, but you might execute an innocent man. People against the death penalty may believe: the death penalty fails as a deterrent, it does not discourage crime, death penalty fails to rehabilitate, encourages brutality, relative suffering, or that conviction of the innocent may occur. People that are for the death penalty may see it as: decreasing the rate of homicide, when you commit a felony it is a matter of free will, there is no proof of any innocent human being executed, the death penalty saves lives, or they may possibly see it as “An eye for an eye”. Currently, there are several pros and cons to the death penalty issues. However, if individuals evaluate the arguments accurately, and have sympathy for the victims, they will be more inclined...
Words: 1734 - Pages: 7
...In New York and North Carolina the age you are legally allowed to be executed is sixteen years old (Pros and Cons Part Two). Two states allow children sixteen and up to be sentenced to this, all other states have a eighteen limit (Pros and Cons Part Two). It should be legal to have the death penalty for juveniles, because dangerous criminal juveniles deserve the same punishment as adults. Juveniles are equal to a grow adult when they break these severe laws. Dangerous criminal minors deserve the same punishment as anyone else. Countries that support these executions include the United States, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen(History of the Death Penalty, Linn). Ninety Seven children have been executed since the year 1900 (HIstory of the Death Penalty, Linn). These children are dangerous people and we cannot trust them again in a public setting. The counties that allow this penalty see them as criminals , there is no age limit for committing crimes. Another reason for juvenile death penalty would include how they would live the rest of their lives out....
Words: 537 - Pages: 3
... The topic I have chosen is the death penalty/capital punishment. What is the capital punishment? It is when someone has committed a crime so severe that their punishment is to be sentenced to death. This kind of punishment is very controversial. Some people think that the death penalty is immoral and unconstitutional. While others think that it is too easy of a punishment. For myself I believe in it. Thirty two states uphold the death penalty: Alabama, Pennsylvania, Mississippi, and Utah are just some of those states. Although this practice is on a slow decline, it is still practiced not only in the United States, but the entire world. How is capital punishment delivered? In the U.S., the two main ways of execution are by lethal injection, and by electrocution. Throughout history, there have been many forms of executions. During the French revolution, people were beheaded at the guillotine. In the Civil war, men were executed by firing squad. Throughout this form of punishment there are many pros and cons. What are some of the pros to capital punishment? Well, while many people say there are none, it does have a few. For one, it is a way to make sure that justice is served. When executions are done throughout the U.S., the victims are, in many states allowed to witness it take place. For some, this is a way to have closer, and to be at ease that the culprit is dealt with and punished for the crimes. Another pro is that it takes these horrible people off the streets and...
Words: 542 - Pages: 3
...Exercise 2 on Pg. 27 2a. I think women are better listeners than men. |Pros |Cons | |Women seem to be more aware in conversations. |Women pay too much attention to conversations | |It enables them to give better advise |They advise only on the information provided to them and not the | | |whole story | |It allows them to be more sensitive |They become over-sensitive. Where men know to stop being | | |sensitive on a issue | |Women pay attention and listen to the whole conversation |Men listen to what they want to listen to | |It shows a sign of support to the individual or person |Sometimes does not include their own feelings or input. | 2b. Capital punishment is no deterrent to crime. |Pros |Cons | |Using Capital Punishment will deter people from committing |People will continue to commit capital crimes if they know the | |violent crimes. ...
Words: 1014 - Pages: 5
...judicial system, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. You could be walking down the street in your very own neighborhood looking for their next victim and you do not even realize it. These criminals have no remorse on what they do; they are just waiting to strike again. However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. It was a family member and you will never see them again. Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for a very long time and it still has no certain solution. The Supreme Court, in 1972 said that it was unconstitutional and had made it legal after the Furman v. Georgia case. They said that it was in violation of our eighth and fourteenth amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Shaw, 2001). They then reinstated the death penalty after the Gregg v. Georgia case in 1976 (Shaw, 2001). As of September 2010, fifteen states that do not have the death penalty ("Death penalty information center," 2010.) Today about seventy percent of Americans who support the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). While thirty percent are against the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). When seeking the death penalty...
Words: 2173 - Pages: 9
...Capital Punishment and Crime Deterred Should capital punishment be used in a justice system to deter the level of serious crimes in a society? There have been arguments that capital punishment is the best way to deter crime and arguments that say it is not all over the world. The justice system is in place to keep societies functioning proper, and punish those who hurt that goal, capital punishment is one of the ways that have been aiding in the success. If capital punishment does act as a deterrent for crime, shouldn’t a society use it as a tool for the justice system? However, if capital punishment does not act as a deterrent for crime, then should it be scrapped by the justice system and emphasis be placed on looking for a new way to deter crime? This is more than just a crime deterrent issue because it involves taking a life to save a life. This is an ethical issue of whether capital punishment is the best way to solve the problem, and this has been argued by millions of people all over the world for decades and it is still a highly debated topic to this day. Capital Punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the practice of sentencing a person to execution as punishment for a capital crime after a proper legal trail. It is typically only used as a form of punishment for people who commit serious types of murder. It may not be known, because many countries never actually use it, but there are 58 countries that currently have a form of the death penalty (Unknown, 2010)...
Words: 2198 - Pages: 9
...today judicial system, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. You could be walking down the street in your very own neighborhood looking for their next victim and you do not even realize it. These criminals have no remorse on what they do; they are just waiting to strike again. However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them. It was a family member and you will never see them again. Capital punishment has been a topic of debate for a very long time and it still has no certain solution. The Supreme Court, in 1972 said that it was unconstitutional and had made it legal after the Furman v. Georgia case. They said that it was in violation of our eighth and fourteenth amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Shaw, 2001). They then reinstated the death penalty after the Gregg v. Georgia case in 1976 (Shaw, 2001). As of September 2010, fifteen states that do not have the death penalty ("Death penalty information center," 2010.) Today about seventy percent of Americans who support the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). While thirty percent are against the death penalty (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, 2011). When seeking the death penalty, it is...
Words: 2168 - Pages: 9
...Sevak Boghossian BCOM 275 May 18, 2014 Corporal Punishment Corporal Punishment Corporal punishment is the inflicting of pain due to disciplinary reasons. Even though it shows discipline, corporal punishment of kids is bad because it can lead to legal troubles and it can cause health issues to the child and lead to the child having bad after effects. It should be banned and alternative ways should be used. Corporal punishment has many pros and cons. Corporal punishment has reasons why it can be good, one reason why corporal punishment can be good it that it can teach morals and values to the children. It can teach the child what is wrong at what is right. It is faster effective way where the child learns its lesson. Corporal punishment also shows power and it puts fear inside of the child. Besides having pros, corporal punishment has many cons. By using this method, many children can end having mental illnesses and go through depression. “Among adults, 2 to 7 percent of cases of mental disorders — including major depression, anxiety disorder and paranoia — are attributable to physical punishment that occurred during childhood, the researchers said” (MyHealthNewsDaily). Physical abuse on a child is very bad, by using force the child can go through many emotional and physical things that sometimes might take many years for them to get back to normal. It puts them in a position where they develop strange methods of hurting themselves more, for...
Words: 518 - Pages: 3
...Capital Punishment 1 Capital Punishment Ronnie C. Smith Running head Capital Punishment 2 Capital Punishment otherwise known as the ‘death penalty’ is the punishment given by governments for an individual who is found guilty of committing a serious offense or crime. Without even a hesitation, executions are well though-out definitive punishment for any offense or felony, because there is no revoke from bereavement. The rational option for capital punishment is living in jail without even parole; a number of states still use capital punishment. The reason behind this is the dispute whether capital punishment is right and permissible is still widely unclear (Phil for Humanity, 2006). Nowadays, one of the most discussed concerns in the Criminal Justice System is none other than capital punishment or otherwise called the death penalty. Capital punishment was legal until 1972, when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia stating that it violated the Eight and Fourteen Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment. However, in 1976, the Supreme Court reversed itself with Gregg v. Georgia and reinstated the death penalty, but not all states have the death penalty (Prodeath.com. 2001). There are always two sides of the coin and so is the case with Capital Punishment. There are people who favor it and there are people who are against it. The first stance. Many people who are against Capital punishment feel...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...Pros and Cons of Death Penalty Does the execution of a murderer serve justice for all? One of the most controversial topics in the world today not only deals with the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, but whether it should be abolished or not . While some believe that the death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment” violating the 8th amendment of the United States Constitution, others argue that “an eye for an eye” does justice. Thirty-four different states support this type of punishment including Oklahoma, leaving fifteen states that do not. According to Newport and the Gallup Polls, as of May 2007, “sixty-six percent of Americans -- almost the same percentage that supports the death penalty” consider the death penalty “morally acceptable.” Only twenty-seven percent of people believe the death penalty is morally wrong. Some say that the “legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world (Ballaro & Cushman)." The death penalty is a very emotional, complex, and rather complicated matter that includes, but not limited to, the argument of the pros and cons as well as the fact that some convicted people whether executed or not are then later freed from guilt and blame (exonerated). There are many different pros of the death penalty, but I have chosen to only discuss a few of the most controversial topics. Supporters of death penalty believe that “[j]ustice is only achieved when a crime is met with the proper punishment...
Words: 1837 - Pages: 8
