Free Essay

The Separate Legal Personality of a Company Means That Shareholders of the Company and Directors of the Company Are Not Responsible for Any Liabilities That Arise as a Result of the Actions of the Company

In:

Submitted By materhk
Words 2213
Pages 9
The Limited Liability Act 1855 was the first Act in the UK legal system that identified the concept of limited liability, which illustrated shareholders would only be liable up to their invested amount of money as capital in the company, later on this Act had been replaced by Stock Companies Act 1856 and consolidated with Companies Act 1862 (CRHK, 2014).Until 1897, the decided legal case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd, the concept of separate legal personality had been ingrained around the world, which means assets and liabilities are owned and being responsible by the company; shareholders only owned shares of the company and would not be responsible for the company's liabilities. This separation is identified as corporate veil (Morris, 2014).

When company registered as a limited company, they would be eligible for the principle of “limited liability”, which liabilities can be limited by shares or limited by guarantee.Throughout the past 100 years, the real benefits of limited liability have been supported by empirical researches done in financial aspects,whereas it can lead to promotion of investment diversification, better investment policies and liquidity in equity market, both shareholders and the company would be beneficial from this issue (Bratton & McCahery, 1997).

Shareholders are highly protected by the limited liability, only in some rare circumstances; shareholders would be liable for the action of the company. The first issue is when shareholders have unpaid their shares; during liquidation, shareholders have to repay the outstanding amount to the company. Secondly, in the case of It's a Wrap (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Gula, the facts shown that shareholders have “ reasonable grounds” to know the company did not have any distributable profits and breached the CA 2006 s.847, the court held shareholders were liable to repay the dividends back to the company (Banerjee, 2013). In reality, shareholders may not fully aware the dividend distribution is lawful and legitimate, unless they shown “reasonable ground”. As well as for directors, if directors knew the distribution was unlawful, then directors would be personally liable to repay the distribution (Winckworth Sherwood, 2013).

Although the Salomon cases had been ingrained in our world for establishing the importance of the corporate veil, from the case of Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd, the court is very unwilling to neglect the importance of separate legal personality, that the veil can only be lifted in some exceptional circumstances. This can be classified as statutory and judicial exceptions, whereas directors or shareholders are being responsible for liabilities that arise as a result of the actions of the company. This essay mainly focuses on the statutory exceptions on lifting the corporate veil.
For statutory exceptions, Bourne summarizes the statutory exceptions are as follows: (Bourne, p. 38-39, 2010).

a) “Fraudulent trading” b) “Wrongful trading” c) “Personal liability of a disqualified person who acts in the management of a company” d) “Liability of officers where a public company trades without a trading certificate”

Regarding to the first two issues, the court would consider whether the use the limited liability has been violated such as fraudulent trading and wrongful trading, then directors would be liable for the these actions in the company. Fraudulent trading is defined as “company carries on a business with the intention of defrauding creditors or for any fraudulent purposes” (SFO, 2014). Furthermore, the Insolvency Act 1986 and Companies Act 2006 stated especially when the company is winding up, the court can decide the knowingly parties can be liable for this event. In the case of Re Todd (Swanscombe) Ltd, the company has been wound up and the former director did not record a substantial amount of cash sales in the company books, whereas the director was “intent to defraud creditors”. The liquidator raised a legal claim against the director for fraudulent trading; the court held the director was personally liable for the company debts (Keay, p. 47, 2007). Wrongful trading is less serious than fraudulent trading, as the latter one would face up to ten-year imprisonment. According to the Cork Report (as cited in Lowey & Reisberg,p.43,2012), wrongful trading is defined as “an attempt to discourage and penalise abuses of limited liability which stemmed from negligent rather than fraudulent conduct”. This idea has been complied within the Insolvency Acts that directors would be liable in the liquidation if they knew “there was no reasonable prospect of the company avoiding insolvent liquidation” (Legislation, 2014). Within this category, directors including de jure, de dacto and shadow directors can be liable for wrongful trading. In the case of Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd and Re Conegrade Ltd, the court held director was liable for the wrongful trading and repaid the money back to the company. (Companies House, 2014).

Section 15 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 stated directors who involved in the company, in terms of directly or indirectly, would be “personally liable for the company debts of he acts in contravention of this order ” (Bourne,p.22,2011). Regarding to the last statutory exception, in the CA s767 (3), when company did not have a valid trading certificate and carried trading, directors would be liable for the fines and if failed to comply the obligation with the transaction within 21 days, “directors of the company are jointly and severally liable to indemnify any other party to the transaction in respect of any loss or damage suffered by him by reason of the company’s failure to comply with its obligations” (Legislation, 2014).

Summarizing the judicial reviews in lifting the corporate veil is very difficult, especially when considering the facts and natures behind each individual case; however, Farrar listed the following categories, such as agency, fraud, group enterprises, trusts, enemy, tax and the companies legislation (cited in Ottolenghi, p. 353, 1990). The above categories explain when would the courts being considered lifting the veil, and shareholders and directors are personally liable for any events aroused from these categories. Recently, the court has lifted the veil and the director was held liable for the death of employees in terms of the corporate manslaughter in criminal law. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 was come into force on the 6th April 2008, whereas corporate manslaughter defined as “ an organisation to which this section applies is guilty of an offence if the way in which its activities are managed or organised: causes a person’s death; and amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owned by the organisation to the deceased” (CPS, 2014).In the case of R v Cotsworld Geotechnical (Holdings) Ltd, Mr. Wright was employed as a geologist, he was working alone in collecting some soil sample in a trench,but it was collapsed and Mr. Wright was dead due to asphyxiation (Tall, 2011). The court held the director of the company, Mr. Eaton, “was also personally charged with gross negligence manslaughter and other health and safety offences”, because he had failed to provide reasonable steps to protect Mr. Wright (Tall, 2011).

In conclusion, the courts have generally followed the Salomon principle and establish the idea of a company is a separate legal person, as shareholders and directors are not liable for any liabilities or action happened in the company. However, throughout the review in statutory exception on lifting the veil, the court would decide the intention and the nature of the case, whether the corporate veil and limited liability have been abused. “Any fault does not rest with the abstract entity that is the company, but rather any fault must rest with the human beings who operates them” (Hudson, p. 281, 2012). The veil should only be lifted based on equitable, fair and ethical consideration.

Bibliography
1. Cases referred to in the assignment Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] BCC 786
It's a Wrap (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Gula [2006] EWCA CIV 544
Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442
R v Cotsworld Geotechnical (Holdings) Ltd [2001] ALL ER (D) 100 (MAY)
Re Brian D Pierson (Contractors) Ltd [1999] BCC 26
Re Conegrade Ltd [2003] BPIR 358
Re Todd (Swanscombe) Ltd [1990] BCLC 454 Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 HL 2. Sections in the Acts referred to in the assignment
Companies Act 2006
CA2006 s.3 (1); s.15 (3) (b); s.767 (3); s.993 (1) & (2) & (3) (a)

Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s.15

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007,s. 1 (1)

Insolvency Act 1986
IA1986 s.213 (1) & (2); s.214 (2) (b) & (7)

3. Web addresses of websites referred to in the assignment
Banerjee, Nigel (2013). Recovering unlawful dividends --- The knowledge threshold in section 847 [Online] Available at http://www.jordanscompanylaw.co.uk/articles/recovering-unlawful-dividends-the-knowledge-threshold-in-section-847#ftn1 [Accessed: 5th March, 2014]

Companies House (2014). Register Essential Corporate Knowledge Issue No. 58 [Online] Available at http://www.companieshouse.gov.uk/about/busRegArchive/RegIssue58.pdf [Accessed: 3rd March, 2014]

Company Registry of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (2014). Study report on history of company incorporation in Hong Kong [Online] Available at http://www.cr.gov.hk/en/publications/docs/studyreport-part1-e.pdf [Accessed: 10th March, 2014]

Joanna, Tall (2011). Look after your staff or face the charge of corporate manslaughter [Online] Available at http://offtoseemylawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Legal_final1.pdf [Accessed: 1st March, 2014]

Legislation (2014). Companies Act 2006 [Online] Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents [Accessed: 2nd March, 2014]

Legislation (2014). Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 [Online] Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/46/contents [Accessed: 2nd March, 2014]

Legislation (2014). Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 [Online] Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/19/contents [Accessed: 2nd March, 2014]

Legislation (2014). Insolvency Act 1986 [Online] Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/45/contents [Accessed: 2nd March, 2014]

Serious Fraud Office (2014) Fraudulent Trading [Online] Available at http://www.sfo.gov.uk/fraud/what-is-fraud/corporate-fraud/fraudulent-trading.aspx [Accessed: 4th March 2014]

The Crown Prosecution Service (2014). Corporate Manslaughter [Online] Available at http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/corporate_manslaughter/#a01 [Accessed: 4th March 2014]

Winckworth Sherwood LLP (2013). Unlawful Dividends [Online] Available at http://www.wslaw.co.uk/site/uploads/publications/1375698973.7493.pdf [Accessed: 7th March, 2014]
4. Journal articles and other materials referred to in the assignment
Bourne, Nicholas (2011). Bourne on Company Law, 5th edition. Cambridge: Routledge

Bratton, William W., McCahery, Joseph A. (1997). An Inquiry into the Efficiency of the Limited Liability Company: Of Theory of the Firm and Regulatory Competition. Volume 54, issue 2, Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 629 (1997) [Online] Available at http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1624&context=wlulr&sei-redir=1&referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dlimited%2Bliability%2Bbusiness%2Befficiency%26go%3D%26qs%3Dn%26form%3DQBRE%26filt%3Dall%26pq%3Dlimited%2Bliability%2Bbusiness%2Befficiency%26sc%3D0-29%26sp%3D-1%26sk%3D#search=%22limited%20liability%20business%20efficiency%22 [Accessed: 10th March, 2014]

Hudson, Alastair (2012). Understanding Company Law. 1st Edition. Oxon: Routledge.

Keay, Andrew R. (2007). Company directors’ responsibilities to creditors. 1st Edition, London: Routledge-Cavendish. [Online] Available at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zfuNAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA47&lpg=PA47&dq=Re+L+Todd+(Swanscombe)+Ltd&source=bl&ots=Ply24qLSIv&sig=lbR3FzWrd9bSU6N0eCVynarlzCk&hl=en&sa=X&ei=EfMeU7HFK6Po7Aah0YGQDw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false [Accessed: 4th March, 2014]

Lowey, John & Reisberg, Arad. (2012). Pettet’s Company Law: Company Law & Corporate Finance.4th Edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited

Morris, Gregory. (2014). BEA 3015: Corporate law: Lecture 3: Separate legal personality

S. Ottolenghi. (1990). From Peeping behind the Corporate Veil, to Ignoring It Completely. The Modern Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 338-353 [Online] Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096475?seq=1&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103718135993 [Accessed: 10th March, 2014]

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Companies Registry of Hong Kong
[ 2 ]. [1897] AC 22 HL
[ 3 ]. Companies Act 2006, s.3 (1)
[ 4 ]. [2006] EWCA CIV 544
[ 5 ]. “Consequence of unlawful distribution” (Legislation,2014)
[ 6 ]. Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses Plc [2001] EWCA CIV 712
[ 7 ]. [2013] UKSC 34
[ 8 ]. Insolvency Act 1986, s.213 & Companies Act 2006, s.993
[ 9 ]. Insolvency Act 1986, s.214
[ 10 ]. Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, s.15
[ 11 ]. Companies Act 2006, s.767(3)
[ 12 ]. Serious Fraud Office
[ 13 ]. Insolvency Act 1986, s. 213(1) & (2)
[ 14 ]. Companies Act 2006, s.993(1) & (2)
[ 15 ]. [1990] BCLC 454
[ 16 ]. Companies Act 2006, s.993 (3) (a).
[ 17 ]. Report of the Review Committee on Insolvency Law and Practice [1982] CMND 8558
[ 18 ]. s.214 2(b)
[ 19 ]. s.214 (7)
[ 20 ]. [1999] BCC 26
[ 21 ]. [2003] BPIR 358
[ 22 ]. s.15 (4)
[ 23 ]. s.15 (3)(b)
[ 24 ]. s.767 (3)
[ 25 ]. Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 All ER 442
[ 26 ]. Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] BCC 786
[ 27 ]. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007,s. 1 (1)
[ 28 ]. The Crown Prosecution Service
[ 29 ]. [2001] ALL ER (D) 100 (MAY)

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Company as a Juristic Person: Kenya Perspective

... THE COMPANY AS A JURISTIC PERSON VERSUS RESPONSIBILITY FOF THE DIRECTOR’S ACTIONS. Introduction: For a very long time a company has been treated as a corporate entity or a juristic person. In fact the concept of limited liability stems from this premise. Despite being an artificial person a company is wholly a creature of human beings, by human beings and for human beings. It solely rely on humans to conduct and transact any business. This research paper seeks to examine the concept of juristic personality, its advantages and its relationship with its owners. It delves into how decisions are made by this juristic personality, its liabilities and liabilities of those running it. The paper shall seek to examine if this veil of juristic person exists permanently or it can be lifted. What are the consequences of lifting that gown of juristic personality? The Concept of juristic personality. Companies and corporations are said to be legal or juristic personalities. This arises from the incorporation process. A corporation is a word that is said to have been derived from a Latin word corpus which means among other things “body”. An incorporated body becomes what is known as a “corpora coporata” in Latin or corporate body. The idea of a juristic person in law refers to an entity recognized in law as an artificial person. What this means is the entity recognized is given rights and responsibilities that arise from the law. The idea here is to separate the entity’s rights...

Words: 3144 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Business Communication

...PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL: ITS LEGAL AND JUDICIAL RECOGNITION IN ETHIOPIA Endalew Lijalem Enyew ♣ Abstract: Upon acquisition of legal personality a company enjoys certain attributes such as limited liability. While the separate legal personality of a company enables it to enjoy rights and assume obligations quite different from its members, the limited liability of shareholders refers to the fact that the company alone is liable for its debts. However, such privilege of limited liability may not always exist when the legal personality of a company is abused and used for illegitimate or unlawful purposes and other reasons. This article examines some of the grounds by which the corporate veil can be pierced under Ethiopian law and the role of courts in recognizing the doctrine. Based on the analysis of the relevant legislative provisions and some court cases, it is found that Ethiopian company law, though not sufficient, provides some clear grounds of piercing the corporate veil and certain possible grounds which may call for the application of the doctrine. It is also argued that Ethiopian courts should apply the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, through the purposive interpretation of the statutory provisions, if doing so produces equitable results and fairness. Key Words: Company, corporate veil, piercing the veil, Ethiopia DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v6i1.3 _____________ Introduction The separate legal personality of a company renders it a juridical person...

Words: 17819 - Pages: 72

Premium Essay

Lifting the Veil

...attribute of separate legal entity is that the company is regarded as a legal person distinct from any and all of the individuals involved in the company by incorporation of a projected or existing enterprise. Under s15(1) of the Companies Act 2006, companies which are registered become incorporated and separate legal persons on registration. As a consequence of the existence of a distinct legal entity, a company has the capacity to be a party to a contract, sue or being sued, commit a crime, be the victim of a crime, hold property, and rationally, thus, make profits and losses that are its own rather than those of the shareholders of the company. The Principle of Separate Legal Personality The importance of the corporate personality which was created by statute in the first half of the nineteenth century was not fully appreciated until the well-known case of Salomon. This case firmly established the operation of the concept of the separate legal personality of a company under the Companies Act of 1862 and this principle is still existed in the Companies Act of 2006 today under the UK Company Law. The Salomon case makes it clear that it is possible for a sole trader owner to transfer a small business into a registered company and hence separate himself from the liabilities of the business. In this case, Salomon carried on a boot and shoe manufacturing business as a sole proprietor. In 1892, he registered a company and sold his profitable business to that company for the purpose...

Words: 3282 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Corporate Law

...Overview * Introduction to and sources of Company Law (2) * Types of companies – General characteristics (7) * Formation of a company (13) * Capital (19) * Financing of company * Corporate Bodies * General meeting * Control * Annual Corporate Compliance * Director’s liabilities * Restructuring of companies * Liquidation of companies * Continuity * Draft questions exam Introduction to and sources of company law Sources When I start up a business in Belgium, whether I’m Belgian or my foreign company locates a subsidiary here, which legislative rules should I take into account? Which legislation can accurately tell me what to do and what not to do? There are four sources of legislation for Belgian companies: the Belgian Company Code, the Jurisprudence, the Doctrine and the European Directives. The Company Code The Company Code is a legislation code that was adopted by the Belgian Parliament on the 7th of May in 1999, which regroups and restructures the main provisions of Belgian Company Law. For decades, authors and practitioners had been complaining about the complexity of the Belgian Company Law. There were far too many sources to it. What they wanted was one and only one book with all the provisions concerning the Belgian Company Law. So by adopting the Company Code, the legislator didn’t have as main objective...

Words: 15600 - Pages: 63

Premium Essay

Corporate Lae

...and services). Where is this regulation?-Corporations Act 2001, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, These are both federal or commonwealth (central government). Subordinate legislation also (regulations under these Acts plus ASX listing rules, statements and Guides, Accounting Standards). Finally, A lot of the important principles relating to corporations and their responsibilities have evolved via case law. The (Corporations) Act has been described as “Bloated” – why???, Moves have been made to simplify the Act, but every time this happens, something else comes in to make it bigger again! The Administrative and Enforcement bodies ASIC, Under ASIC Act, Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, Takeovers Panel, Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board, Financial Reporting Council, Australian Accounting Standards Board,...

Words: 11028 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Business Associations

...by the agent is binding on the principal 1. principal may be liable in K, tort, property, etc…. (Vicarious liability) ii. question of agency is a factual matter to be determined as a “matter of fact” b. Res 3d Agency 1.01 (definition of “Agency”) i. Agency relationship created when (First Question to ask when dealing with agency) 1. The principal manifests assent to have the agent act on the principal’s behalf and under the principal’s control; and 2. The agent manifests assent or otherwise consents so to act 1. When agency exists the principles of attribution bind’s the principals to agents dealings with third parties 2. manifestation need not be by words (spoken or written), it may be created by conduct/actions i. Agent rx believes that Principal has manifested assent, and has rx accepted ii. (Notes….Legal Consequences of Agency) 1. Inward Looking Consequences: relate to the relationship between the principal and the agent and are largely governed by the contracts between the parties and by the law of fiduciary duties 2. Outward Looking Consequences: relates to the relationship among the principal, the agent, and a third party and are governed by various “principles of attribution” (authority….actual/apparent) 1. Tend to be the primary focus where central issue is agency formation 2. Come about because principals can be held liable for the tortuous actions of their agents c. Res 3d Agency 1.02 i. Whether a relationship is characterized as agency in an agreement...

Words: 21088 - Pages: 85

Premium Essay

Cima 05

...Foster Back H8032-Prelims.QXD 7/1/06 11:08 AM Page ii CIMA Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA First edition 2006 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (ϩ44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (ϩ44) (0) 1865 853333; e-mail: permissions@elsevier.com. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining Permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN-13: 978 0 7506 8032 5 ISBN-10: 0 7506 8032 6 For information on all CIMA publications visit our web site at books.elsevier.com Typeset by Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd,...

Words: 249182 - Pages: 997

Premium Essay

Assignment 1

...Question 3 or 4 in Section A. Only 3 solutions will be marked. 2. When the examination is over, place your solutions to this section of the Corporate Laws and Governance examination in a separate envelope to your solutions to Section B. Q. 1. The Board of XYZ Ltd. is considering a major diversification of the Company’s activities into a new product/market area. The Board of Directors are aware of the risks of diversification away from the Company’s existing core business and are anxious to limit the resulting risks of such a move. Accordingly, they have decided that a new company, which will be a subsidiary of XYZ Ltd. Should be set up for the purpose of carrying on the new business. The Finance Director of XYZ has been asked by the Board to advise on the funding options for the subsidiary. You are have been asked by the Finance Director to assist in this task. Specifically, you are required to draft a memorandum dealing with the following issues: a) The different types of real non-possessory security interests that are recognised in Irish law. (5 marks) b) The likely terms that a bank will seek to incorporate into any debenture creating a charge over the subsidiary’s undertaking and assets. (5 marks) c) The types of charges that must be registered under Section 99 of the Companies Act 1963. (4 marks) d) The powers that a Receiver appointed out of Court on foot of a debenture might be expected to possess. (5 marks) e) The likelihood of a bank being willing...

Words: 11036 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Management

...COMMERCIAL COMPANIES IN LEBANON 06 Chamber of Commerce Industry and Agriculture of Beirut and Mount Lebanon 00 CONTENT 01 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN 02 JOINT LIABILITY COMPANY 03 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 04 UNDECLARED PARTNERSHIP 05 JOINT STOCK COMPANY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (LLC) 07 PARTNERSHIP LIMITED BY SHARES 08 HOLDING COMPANIES 09 OFFSHORE COMPANIES 10 THIRD-FOREIGN COMPANIES Chamber of Commerce Industry and Agriculture of Beirut and Mount Lebanon 01 2 LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN True to its mission of supporting the private economy, the Chamber hereby undertakes to assist prospective foreign investors all through the establishment process. The defining advantages of Lebanon’s investment environment derive from its free enterprise system distinguished by a high degree of openness to foreign trade and the absence of restrictions on capital movement. Such system naturally safeguards private ownership of all form of assets, and subjects local and foreign investors to the same code of laws and regulations. Hence, foreign investors retain full control over their business and private assets, unhindered by the constraint of an imposed local partner or restrictions on business and investment decisions. Evolution at the policy-making level continues to build on the competitiveness of the investment environment. The public-private partnership approach certainly generates ...

Words: 12612 - Pages: 51

Premium Essay

Cms Dutiesresposibilitiesdirectors

...CMS_LawTax_CMYK_28-100.eps Duties & Responsibilities of Directors September 2012 With increased consolidation of business across Europe, executives of multinational groups can find that they are required to become directors of companies in a variety of jurisdictions, often at short notice. The rules relating to directorships vary considerably from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. This guide is intended to provide an overview of the duties and responsibilities of directors across 23 countries in Europe, answering the most frequently asked questions for directors coming from another jurisdiction. In many jurisdictions, there are various forms of company available, and there are different rules for directors according to the type of company used. This guide focuses for each jurisdiction on the most common form of company, and on the rules which apply to executive / managing directors. CMS is the organisation of independent European law and tax firms of choice for organisations based in, or looking to move into, Europe. CMS provides a deep local understanding of legal, tax and business issues and delivers client-focused services through a joint strategy executed locally across 28 countries with 52 offices in Western and Central Europe and beyond. CMS was established in 1999 and today comprises ten CMS firms, employing over 2,800 fee earners and is headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. This guide is intended only to provide a general overview of the matters covered. It is based...

Words: 76452 - Pages: 306

Premium Essay

Manual Corporate Govrnance Pakistan

...Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan This manual is for reference only and does not constitute any legal requirement on companies, their officers, directors or auditors. This manual may be used for guidance and compliance must be ensured with the provisions of applicable laws and regulations. CONTENTS I. II. INTRODUCTION WHAT IS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE? (i) The Background (ii) Definition of Corporate Governance (iii) The Benefits of Corporate Governance (iv) The Pakistani Corporation (v) The Origins of Corporate Governance in Pakistan THE NEED FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE THE STAKEHOLDERS (i) General (ii) Shareholders (iii) Directors (iv) Employees (v) Creditors PROMOTING REFORM AND SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGERS (i) Directors and Managers Distinguished (ii) Appointment and Proceedings of Directors (iii) Fiduciary Duties (iv) Powers and Responsibilities of Directors (v) Liability of Directors (vi) Executive and the Non-executive Directors (vii) The CEO 1 3 3 4 7 8 10 12 17 17 19 20 20 21 22 26 26 26 32 38 42 42 45 III. IV. V. VI. (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) The Company Secretary The CFO Internal Control System Reporting Requirements 47 49 49 50 VII. SCRUTINIZING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - WHAT EVERY DIRECTOR SHOULD KNOW (i) General (ii) Liability of Directors (iii) Preparation of Financial Statements (iv) Tools for Directors' Review (v) How to Prevent Misleading and Fraudulent Financial Statements (vi) External Auditors (vii)...

Words: 8905 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Corporate Governance

...Governance Program that IFC is implementing in Indonesia since 2012. This manual is distributed with the understanding that neither the authors, nor the organizations, countries they represent, nor the publisher are engaged in rendering legal or financial advice. The material in this Manual is set out in good faith for general guidance, and no liability can be accepted for any possible loss or expense in incurred as a result of relying on the information contained herein. This publication is not intended to be exhaustive. It should not be relied upon as a basis for formulating business decisions. On all financial issues and questions, an accountant, auditor, or other financial specialist should be consulted. A lawyer should be consulted on all legal issues and questions. As the laws in the Republic of Indonesia are constantly changing, legal rules referred to herein may be obsolete or superseded by new legislation at the moment of the publication of this Manual. All references to the male gender throughout this Manual apply to both sexes, unless otherwise indicated. The conclusions and judgments contained in this report should not be attributed to, and do not necessarily represent the views of IFC or its Board of Directors or the World...

Words: 131549 - Pages: 527

Premium Essay

Meaning, Characteristics and Types of a Company

...MEANING, CHARACTERISTICS AND TYPES OF A COMPANY INTRODUCTION Industrial has revolution led to the emergence of large scale business organizations. These organization require big investments and the risk involved is very high. Limited resources and unlimited liability of partners are two important limitations of partnerships of partnerships in undertaking big business. Joint Stock Company form of business organization has become extremely popular as it provides a solution to overcome the limitations of partnership business. The Multinational companies like Coca-Cola and, General Motors have their investors and customers spread throughout the world. The giant Indian Companies may include the names like Reliance, Talco Bajaj Auto, Infosys Technologies, Hindustan Lever Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., and Larsen and Tubro etc. 1.2 MEANING OF COMPANY Section 3 (1) (i) of the Companies Act, 1956 defines a company as “a company formed and registered under this Act or an existing company”. Section 3(1) (ii) Of the act states that “an existing company means a company formed and registered under any of the previous companies laws”. This definition does not reveal the distinctive characteristics of a company . According to Chief Justice Marshall of USA, “A company is a person, artificial, invisible, intangible, and existing only in the contemplation of the law. Being a mere creature of law, it possesses only those properties which the character of its creation of its creation confers...

Words: 114216 - Pages: 457

Premium Essay

Corporation (Fisch) Outline Penn Law

...) Debt, Equity, and Valuation 22 III.) CONTROL OF CORPORATE DECISIONS 32 A.) The Role of the Shareholder 32 B.) Management Obligations 50 1.) Duty of Care 51 2.) Duty of Loyalty 56 3.) Duty of Fairness: Parent-Subsidiary Relationships 63 4.) Duty of Good Faith 64 5.) Management Obligations Under Federal Securities Laws 67 C.) Shareholder Litigation 76 IV.) Structural Changes 85 A.) Transactions in Control 85 B.) Mergers and Acquisitions 86 1.) Mergers 87 2.) Sale of Assets 93 3.) Asset Purchase or Tender Offer 94 C.) Public Control Contests 96 1.) The Poison Pill 100 2.) Enhanced Review When Business is Up for Sale 103 3.) Proxy Contests for Corporate Control 106 4.) Protecting the Deal: Shareholder Lockup Agreements 109 I.) INTRODUCTORY PRINCIPLES • Definitions o Corporate Law: The allocation of rights and power within a corporation; the internal body of law ▪ Addresses the creation of economic wealth through the facilitation of voluntary, ongoing collective action ▪ Flexible- expectation that market discipline will weed out what is not working ▪ Principle aim- reduce agency costs of all sorts o Securities Law: Regulates capital markets that corporations use to obtain funding o Firm: A form of business relation that has a temporal dimension, a social identity, and a separate pool of dedicated assets Efficiency and Other Concepts • Efficiency is the primary...

Words: 62796 - Pages: 252

Premium Essay

Mr Ahsan Aslam

...electronic publications which help readers to understand and apply their content, whether studying or at work. To find out more about the complete range of our publishing, please visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk   6th Edition Financial Accounting for Decision Makers Peter Atrill and Eddie McLaney   Pearson Education Limited Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE England and Associated Companies throughout the world Visit us on the World Wide Web at: www.pearsoned.co.uk Second edition published 1999 by Prentice Hall Europe Third edition published 2002 by Pearson Education Limited Fourth edition 2005 Fifth edition 2008 Sixth edition 2011 © Prentice Hall Europe 1996, 1999 © Pearson Education Limited 2002, 2011 The rights of Peter Atrill and Eddie McLaney to be identified as authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,...

Words: 211090 - Pages: 845