Free Essay

Transfer Pricing

In:

Submitted By karinaroselin
Words 2110
Pages 9
SOAL LATIHAN TRANSFER PRICING

SOAL 1:
PT PARAHYANGAN INDUSTRYmemilikibeberapadivisiusahanyadansalahsatunyaadalahdivisiA yang khususmemproduksiproduk spare part denganmerk ‘PLAZO’ yang selamainidijualkepasareksternal. Padaawaltahun 2008, PT PARAHYANGAN INDUSTRY membentuk 1 divisibarulagiyaitudivisi F untukmemproduksiproduk ‘METAZO’, danuntukmenghasilkanproduk METAZO inijugadiperlukan spare part seperti yang dihasilkanolehdivisi A. Divisi F jugamendapatkanpenawarandaripihakluaruntukmembeliproduk spare part tsb yang samaseperti yang dihasilkanolehdivisi A.
Di bawahinibeberapa data produksidan data lainnyadaridivisiA, sbb: * Kapasitasproduksi normal setahununtukproduk PLAZO adalah 250.000 unit, dansampaisaatinidivisi A barudapatmenggunakankapasitasproduksinyasebesar 75% darikapasitas yang ada, danseluruhproduk yang diproduksidapatterjualkepasareksternaldenganharga per unit Rp. 31.000. * Biayaproduksiuntukmembuat spare part PLAZO adalahsbb: * BahanlangsungRp. 1.350.000.000. * UpahlangsungRp. 768.750.000.000. * Variable conversion cost Rp.1.425.000.000. * Manufacturing Overhead cost Rp. 1.856.250.000. * Biaya Variable SGA per unit Rp. 3.200, dari jumlah mana sebanyak 30% dapat dihindarkan apabila terjadi internal sales antar divisi. * Biaya Fixed SGA per tahun sebesar Rp. 824.031.250, dimana 35% merupakan sunk cost.
Divisi F bisa membeliprodukspare part tsb dari supplier luardenganhargaRp. 28.500/unit.
Pertanyaan : a) Hitunglah di antara harga transfer berapakah akan terjadi internal sales dintara divisi A dan divisi F. b) Jika permintaan divisi F sebesar 50.000 unit untuk produk PLAZO per tahun dengan harga transfer Rp. 19.000 per unit, apakah permintaan divisi F tsb akan dipenuhi oleh divisi A. Jika dipenuhi bagaimana pengaruhnya terhadap income PT Parahyangan Industry. c) Jika divisi A beroperasi penuh pada kapasitas normalnya dan harus memenuhi permintaan divisi F sebanyak 75.000 unit produk PLAZO per tahun dengan harga Rp.22.000 per unit, hitunglah pengaruh internal sales ini terhadap invome divisi A, divisi F dan perusahaan secara keseluruhan (corporate). Perhitungan TP minimum menggunakan konsep opportunity cost. d) Apabila permintaan divisi F adalah 75.000 unit produk PLAZO dan divisi A tidak dapat menambah kapasitas normalnya, berapakah harga transfer yang ditetapkan jika kebijakan divisi A adalah memperoleh laba setelah sebelum pajak sebesar 15% dari sales. e) Jika divisi Alpha beroperasi penuh pada kapasitas normalnya dan seluruh produk yang dihasilkan dapat dijual di pasar eksternal, apakah : a. permintaan divisi F sebanyak 55.000 unit produk PLAZO dengan harga Rp. 27.400 per unit dapat dipenuhi oleh divisi A ? b. permintaan divisi F sebanyak 60.000 unit produk PLAZO dengan harga RP. 30.250 per unit dapat dipenuhi oleh divisi A ?
SOAL 2:
PT Hamparan memiliki beberapa divisi usahanya yaitu divisi A dan divisi B, dimana produk divisi A dapat digunakan sebagai input bagi divisi B untuk memproduksi produknya. Setiap divisi merupakan divisi yang otonom dan diharapkan dapat menghasilkan return on investment sebesar minimal 14% per tahun. Divisi A memproduksi suku cadang X500 dan pada saat ini memiliki operating assets sebesar Rp. 3.400.000.000. Selama tahun ini produk yang dihasilkan oleh divisi A dijual di pasar eksternal dengan harga Rp. 27.000 per unit dan beroperasi di bawah kapasitas normalnya yaitu hanya sebesar 85% atau sama dengan 119.000 unit saja.
Data biaya produksi dan biaya penjualan suku cadang X500 pada saat ini adalah sbb : * Biaya prime cost Rp. 1.309.000.000. * Variable conversion cost Rp. 743.600.000. * Manufacturing Overhead Rp. 773.500.000, darijumlahmanasebanyak 60% bersifattetap. * Total Variable SGA sebesarRp. 238.000.000. * Fixed Selling expenses/tahunsebesarRp. 102.000.000. * Fixed General & administration expenses/tahunsebesarRp. 124.000.000.
Apabila terjadi penjualan internal/transfer antar divisi, maka biaya variable SGA sebesar 60%nya dapat dihindarkan. Selama ini divisi B membeli suku cadang yang sama dari supplier lain dengan harga Rp. 25.700 per unit, dengan kebutuhan berkisar antara 10.000 sampai dengan 20.000 unit per tahun. Manajer divisi A sedang melakukan penawaran kepada divisi B untuk membeli suku cadang X500 tsb dari divisi A dengan harga Rp. 24.000 per unit dengan pertimbangan bahwa harga tsb tidak akan mempengaruhi segmen pasar yang ada.
Tax rate = 25%, dividend rate = 35% dan sunk cost = 30% dari total cost.

Berdasarkan data di atas diminta untuk menghitung : a) Apabila permintaan divisi B sebanyak 16.000 unit dengan harga RP. 16.500 per unit dipenuhi oleh divisi A, bagaimanakah pengaruh internal transfer ini terhadap income divisi A, divisi B dan PT Hamparan sebagai corporate. b) Jika produk yang dihasilkan oleh divisi A dapat dijual seluruhnya ke pasar eksternal, apakah akan terjadi internal sales berdasarkan harga kesepakatan tsb di atas? Jelaskan. c) Jikadivisi A tidakdapatmenambahkapasitasproduksinormalnyadanpermintaandivisi B sebanyak 26.000 unit denganhargaRp. 24.000 per unit diterimaolehdivisi A, maka : 1) Bagaimanakah pengaruhnya terhadap income divisi A, divisi B dan PT Hamparan secara corporate. 2) Hitunglah besarnya laba operasi yang dihasilkan oleh tiap-tiap rupiah penggunaan operating assets divisi A setelah terjadi internal transfer. d) Misalkan kebutuhan divisi B adalah 30.000 unit per tahun dan divisi A tidak dapat menambah kapasitas produksinya untuk memenuhi internal transfer tsb serta kebijakan divisi A adalah memperoleh target profit sebesar 25% dari total biaya, berapakah harga transfer yang dibebankan divisi A kepada divisi B?
SOAL 3:
PT TrimantramemilikibeberapadivisiusahadansalahsatunyaadalahadalahDivisi A yang menghasilkanproduk “Amora” yang dapatdijualsecaraeksternaldan internal dengankapasitasmaksimalsebesar 240.000 unit per tahun, sedangkankapasitasnormalnyasebesar 200.000 unit per tahun.Selamatahun 2010 jumlahproduksi “Amora” yang dihasilkanolehdivisi A mencapai 180.000 unit per tahundanproduk yang dihasilkannyatsbtelahterjualseluruhnyakepasareksternaldenganhargaRp. 50.000 per unit.
Data biayadaridivisiAselamatahun 2010 adalahsbb: * Prime cost Rp. 3.960.000.000 * Manufacturing cost Rp. 5.895.000.000 * FMO rate per unit Rp. 5.400 yang didasarkanpadakapasitas normal. * BebanoperasionalvariabelberjumlahRp. 1.080.000.000 darijumlahmana 75% merupakanbebanpenjualanvariabel. Dari jumlahbebanpenjualanvariabeltsbdiantaranyasebesar Rp.432 jutamerupakankomisipenjualan yang berkaitandenganpenjualaneksternal, biayapengirimansebesarRp. 1.500 per unit danselebihnyaadalahbebanoperasionalvariabellainnya. * BebanoperasionaltetapsebesarRp. 540 juta per tahun, darijumlahmanasebesarRp. 90 jutamerupakanbebanpenyusutan.
Perusahaan barusajamengakuisisi PT Maharta yang membutuhkanprodukAmoraseperti yang dihasilkanolehdivisi A, danselamaini PT MahartamembeliproduktsbdaripihakluardenganhargaRp. 45.000 per unit.DalamrangkamewujudkansinergikorporasimanajerdivisiAmenawarkankepadamanajer PT MahartauntukmembeliprodukAmoratsbdaridivisinya. Untukpenjualan internal tidakakandibayarkomisipenjualan, penghematanbebanpengirimansebesar 40% danpenambahanbebanumumdanadministrasivariabelsebesarRp. 200 per unit. Tax rate = 20%.

Berdasarkan data di atas, saudaradiminta: a. Diantaraharga transfer berapakahakanterjadi internal sales antaradivisi A dengan PT Maharta. b. Jikaseluruhproduk yang dihasilkandivisi A dapatdijualkepasareksternal, apakahpermintaan PT Mahartasebesar 24.000 unit denganhargaRp. 45.000 per unit akandipenuhiolehdivisi A. Berikanalasannya. c. JikadivisiAtidakdapatmenambahkapasitasnormalnya, danpermintaan PT Mahartasebesar 22.000 unit denganharga RP. 40.000 per unit dipenuhiolehdivisi A, bagaimanakahpengaruhnyaterhadap income divisi A, PT Mahartadanlaba corporate. d. Jikadivisi A tidakdapatmenambahkapastiasnormalnya, danpermintaan PT Mahartaadalah 25.000 unit, sertakebijakandivisi A adalahmemperolehlababersihsetelahpajak (EAT) sebesar 10% dari sales, berapakahharga transfer yang dibebankandivisi A kepada PT Maharta. e. Apabila average operating assets divisiAadalahRp. 4.600 juta, berapakahbesarnyalababersih yang dihasilkanolehsetiap rupiah penggunaan operating assets bagidivisi A denganasumsibahwasebesar 15.000 unit akanditransferpada PT MahartadenganhargaRp. 40.000 per unit dankapasitas normal divisi A tidakberubah.
SOAL 4:
PT ENTERPRISE INDUSTRYmemiliki 4 divisiusahadandiantaranyaadalahdivisi A yang khususmemproduksiproduk spare part AXARA yang selamainidijualkepasareksternaldandivisilainnyadivisi B yaitudivisi yang memproduksiproduk ALFA yang manajugamemerlukanproduk spare part AXARA tersebutsebagaisalahsatubahanuntukmenghasilkanproduk ALFA. Divisi B jugamendapatkanpenawarandaripihakluaruntukmembeliprodukjenis spare part yang samadengan yang diproduksiolehdivisi A.

Sampaisaatinidivisi A barumenggunakankapasitasproduksinyasebesar 70% darikapasitasproduksi normal setahun yang sebesar 300.000 unit, danseluruhproduk yang diproduksitersebutdapatdijualkepasareksternaldenganharga per unit Rp. 40.000.

Biayaproduksi yang telahdikeluarkanuntukproduksi spare part AXARA adalahsbb: * Direct Material Rp. 1.890.000.000. * Direct Labor 1.365.000.000 * Variable conversion cost 2.310.000.000 * Manufacturing Overhead Cost 2.220.000.000
Biaya Variable SGA per unit Rp. 3.500, dari jumlah mana sebanyak 40% dapat dihindarkan apabila terjadi internal sales antar divisi.
Biaya Fixed SGA per tahunsebesarRp. 927.000.000, dimana 70% merupakan out of pocket cost.
Divisi B bisa membeliprodukspare part tsb dari supplier luardenganhargaRp. 38.000/unit.

Pertanyaan : a) Hitunglah di antara harga transfer berapakah akan terjadi internal sales dintara divisi A dan divisi B. b) Jika permintaan divisi B sebesar 70.000 unit untuk produk AXARA per tahun dengan harga transfer Rp. 26.000 per unit, apakah permintaan divisi B tsb akan dipenuhi oleh divisi A. Jika dipenuhi bagaimana pengaruhnya terhadap income PT Enterprise Industry. c) Jika divisi A beroperasi penuh pada kapasitas normalnya dan harus memenuhi permintaan divisi B sebanyak 110.000 unit produk AXARA per tahun dengan harga Rp.22.000 per unit, hitunglah pengaruh internal sales ini terhadap income divisi A, divisi B dan perusahaan secara keseluruhan (corporate). Perhitungan TP minimum menggunakan konsep opportunity cost. d) Apabila permintaan divisi B adalah 110.000 unit produk AXARA dan divisi A tidak dapat menambah kapasitas normalnya, berapakah harga transfer yang ditetapkan jika kebijakan divisi A adalah memperoleh laba setelah setelah pajak sebesar 12% dari sales. Tax rate = 40%.
SOAL 5:
PT Maharaja Industry memiliki 2 divisi yaitu divisi A dan divisi B, dimana divisi A menghasilkan produk ‘Miko’ dengan kapasitas produksi normal sebesar 180.000 unit per tahun. Selama ini produk Miko dijual ke pasar eskternal dengan harga Rp. 32.000 per unit dan total penjualan mencapai 144.000 unit per tahun. Seluruh produk yang dihasilkan dapat terjual seluruhnya.
Data biaya yang berkaitan dengan produksi dan penjualan selama tahun 2010 adalah sbb: * Prime cost Rp. 1.800.000.000, dari jumlah mana sebesar Rp. 1.224.000.000 merupakan biaya bahan langsung. * Manufacturing cost Rp. 3.366.000.000. * Fixed MO rate Rp. 4.300 per unit, yang didasarkan pada kapasitas normal. * Beban penjualan variabel terdiri dari komisi yang berkaitan dengan penjualan eksternal Rp. 144.000.000, beban pengiriman Rp. 108.000.000 dan beban penjualan lain-lain Rp. 64.800.000. Beban umum dan administrasi variabel Rp. 172.800.000. * Beban operasional tetap Rp. 400.000.000 dari jumlah mana 20% merupakan sunk cost.
Divisi B membutuhkan produk Miko berkisar antara 20.000 unit – 45.000 unit per tahun. Selama ini divisi B dapat membeli produk seperti produk Miko dari pemasok luar dengan harga Rp. 30.000 per unit. Untuk meningkatkan sinergy antar kedua divisi, beberapa minggu terakhir manajer divisi A mencoba menawarkan produk Miko yang dihasilkan kepada manajer divisi B. Jika terjadi internal sales, maka terdapat penambahan biaya bahan langsung sebesar Rp. 1000 per unit, penghematan beban pengiriman sebesar Rp. 300 per unit dan penghematan beban umum dan administrasi variabel sebesar 25%. Diasumsikan tax rate = 20%.
Saudara diminta: 1. Jika permintaan divisi B sebanyak 30.000 unit dengan harga Rp. 28.000 per unit apakah permintaan tsb akan diterima oleh divisi A? Beri alasannya dengan menunjukkan dampaknya terhadap laba divisi A, divisi B dan laba corporate. 2. Jika seluruh produk yang dihasilkan oleh divisi A dapat dijual ke pasar eksternal; (a) berapakah harga TP minimum bagi divisi A? (b) apakah permintaan divisi B sebanyak 40.000 unit dengan harga Rp. 30.000 per unit diterima oleh divisi A? (c) jika diterima bagaimana dampaknya terhadap income divisi A, divisi B dan laba corporate? 3. Jika divisi A tidak dapat menambah kapasitas normalnya dan permintaan divisi B sebesar 40.000 unit serta kebijakan divisi A adalah memperoleh laba bersih setelah pajak (EAT) sebesar 9% dari penjualan, berapakah harga transfer yang dibebankan divisi A kepada divisi B? 4. Jika divisi A tidak dapat menambah kapasitas normalnya dan permintaan divisi B sebesar 40.000 unit dengan harga Rp. 29.000 per unit dipenuhi oleh divisi A; (a) bagaimana dampaknya terhadap laba divisi A, divisi B dan laba corporate, (b) hitunglah besarnya EAT yang diperoleh divisi A setelah terjadi internal sales.

BAGIAN 7: PRODUCT PRICING
Soal 1.
PT Trimegah Industryadalahsebuahperusahaan yang memproduksisparepart computer ACER.Berikutinilaporanrugilaba PT Trimegah Industry per 31 Desember 2011 sebagaiberikut:

Sales Rp.547.840.000
COGS:
* Direct Material 248.000.000 * Direct Labor 90.000.000 * Variable MO 50.000.000 * Fixed MO 40.000.000
Total COGS 428.000.000
Gross Profit 119.840.000
-/- SGA: - Variable SGA 22.800.000 - Fixed SGA 16.000.000
Total SGA 38.800.000
Operating Income 81.040.000

Diminta:
Hitunglah:
a) Besarnya mark up on direct materials. b) Besarnya mark up on cost of goods sold (COGS) c) Apabilaada order dari PT Gentauntukpembeliansparepart yang khususdenganbiayaproduksisparepart computer per unit tersebutsebagaiberikut: direct material Rp. 460.000 direct labor Rp. 100.000
Variable MO Rp. 22.222
Fixed MO Rp. 17.778
Total cost Rp. 600.000
Hitunglahbesarnyahargapenawaran yang berdasarkan mark up on direct materials dan mark up on cost of goods sold (COGS)
Soal 2.
PT Prasetya Indahadalahperusahaan yang memproduksiminumankaleng yang baruberdiripadaawaltahun 2010 dengan total investasisebesarRp. 960.000.000. Perusahaan memperkirakanakanmemproduksidanmenjualsebanyak 16.000 botolminumandenganestimasibiayasbb: * Biaya variable Rp. 3.000 per botol. * BiayaTetap:
Biayaproduksitetap (FMO) Rp .175.000.000
Biaya SGA tetapRp. 177.000.000
Total biayatetapRp. 352.000.000
Manajemenperusahaanmenargetkanakanmendapatkan return on investment sebesar 25%, dankebijakanhargajualadalah full costs (total costs) ditambahdengan mark up untukmencapai ROI yang ditargetkan.

Diminta: a) Berapa %kah mark up yang harusdiperhitungkankedalamhargajualsetiapbotolminuman? b) Berapakahhargajualminuman per botolnya? c) Menurutmanajer marketing PT Prasetya Indah, jikahargajual yang telahditetapkantersebutditurunkansebesar 10%, penjualandapatmeningkatsebesar 10%. Apakahsebaiknyahargajualtersebutditurunkan? Jelaskan.

Soal 3.
PT Bukit Timahmemproduksi 2 jenisprodukyaitu A dan B. Data penjualandanbiayauntuk ke-2 produktsbselamatahun 2011 sebagaiberikut:
Produk AProduk B
Unit Penjualan 5.400 unit 8.100 unit
Harga per unit 20.000 32.000
Variable manufacturing cost per unit 11.700 19.860
Variable SGA per unit 2.300 4.140

Total Fixed Cost Selma tahun 2011 adalahsebesarRp. 71.320.000, dimana 40% merupakan sunk cost. Untuktahun 2012, manajemenperusahaansedangmempertimbangkanuntukmengadakanpenyesuaianhargajualuntuk ke-2 produktsbsebagaiberikut: * MenurunkanhargajualprodukAkarenaperusahaanberhasildapatmenurunkanbiayaproduksivariabel per unitnyasebesar Rp.900. Dan perusahaanperlumenambahsatuperalatankhusussenilaiRp. 26.880.000. * Menaikkanhargajualproduk B sebesarRp. 1.000 per unit.
Untuktahun 2012, perusahaanakanmelakukaninvestasisebesarRp. 265.000.000 dalampiutang, persediaanbarangdagangandanaktivatetapuntukmendapatkan ROI sebesar 20%. Dan perusahaantetapmengambilkebijakanuntukmempertahankankomposisipenjualanatau sales mix berdasarkan unit penjualandanbesarnya contribution margin rata-rata per unit dipertahankantetapkonstan.

Pertanyaan: a) Hitunglahhargajual minimal produkAtsbsehubungandenganrencanaperusahaantahun 2012. b) Untukmencapai ROI tsb, hitunglahberapa unit yang harusdijualselamatahun 2012. c) Hitunglahhargajual minimal produkAapabilahargajualproduk B tidakjadidinaikkan. d) Ataspertanyaan (a), jika total fixed MO yang dianggarkanuntukproduk A adalahRp. 23.000.000 danproduk B Rp.25.000.000, sedangkankapasitasproduksi normal masing-masingprodukadalah 20.000 unit, berapakah mark up di atas total product cost (COGS) per unit untukproduk A dan B.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

... Complex organizational structures help achieve business objectives such as increased profitability and reduced risks. Also, these complex structures allow the company to reduce its overall tax burden. One such strategy is discussed in this paper. Transfer pricing allows the company to price the inter-company transactions. Transfer pricing simplifies the accounting of transactions that take place between affiliated or related entities. Companies have freedom in valuing inter-company transactions. But, if strategically implemented, this strategy allows the company to save taxes and retain large amount of profits. Keywords: Transfer mispricing, tax-havens, Double Irish Dutch Arrangement Transfer Pricing Transfer pricing is the methodology used to set the prices for goods sold or services provided between related entities within an enterprise. Related entities are those which are under control of a single corporation and include branches and companies that are wholly or majority owned ultimately by the parent company. Generally, such a transfer price should be equal to the price which the entity would charge to an independent customer, an arm’s length customer. Such a price is termed as an “arm’s length price” (Transfer Pricing, Wikipedia, 2015). Financial accounting does not differentiate between affiliates and treats the corporate group as a single entity. But the federal income tax law treats affiliates as separate economic actors. This allows multinational companies a...

Words: 3264 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...3 Effects of Exchange Rates On International Transfer Pricing Decisions Canri Chan (E-mail: canri.chan@miis.edu), Monterey Institute of International Studies Steven P. Landry (E-mail: steve.landry@miis.edu), Monterey Institute of International Studies Terrance Jalbert (E-mail: jalbert@hawaii.edu), University of Hawaii at Hilo Abstract Events leading to the passing of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have led to increased concern with and scrutiny of potential management manipulation of financial statements. From an agency theory perspective, managers have incentives to manipulate organizational methods and choices in order to produce financial statements that those managers believe will maximize their incentive compensation. Transfer pricing represents one possible choice that managers can manipulate. This paper investigates whether exchange rates affect transfer pricing particularly as it relates to maximizing overall corporate profitability. The effects of taxes and government regulations have been explored in considerable depth in the transfer pricing literature. However, while transfer prices should also be affected by exchange rates in predictable ways, this variable has received comparably little attention in the literature. Inclusion of exchange rates in an analysis of transfer pricing and corporate profitability presents an opportunity to add to the literature. We conducted an experiment to examine how managers set transfer prices. We found that, while individuals were influenced...

Words: 7869 - Pages: 32

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...Transfer Pricing Kim: “I ... don’t understand why it would make sense to pay $450/ton for pulp [to buy internally from Northwestern’s U.S. pulp mills] when I can get it for $330/ton from Chile.” Ewing: “I understand your motivation for wanting to source the pulp from Chile, but it is important [to buy inside] for the corporation to act as an integrated team.” Barrett and Slape (2000: 597) Executive summary The quote above is an excerpt from a phone conversation between Bill Ewing, the Vice President of Northwestern Paper Company 1, and Arthur Kim, the Director of Northwestern’s South Korean subsidiary. This conversation rises questions on the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing internal transfer prices. Such as: given that some subsidiaries are located in lower tax jurisdictions, would it not be logical to set lower internal transfer prices to those subsidiaries? Would it not be logical to allow the Korean subsidiary to purchase from outside suppliers given that internal transfer prices are much higher than market prices in Chile? Allowing subsidiaries to outsource externally would lead to the bankruptcy of the US subsidiaries, which would not have enough demand for their products? What are the advantages and disadvantages of a reward system based on the allocation of internal consumption? Is the allocation process “fair” to each subsidiary? Is it “fair” to the company as a whole? Questions and doubts on transfer pricing probably haunt not only Mr. Ewing and the Northwestern...

Words: 919 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Transfer Pricing

...length price. * The CUP method is the most direct way of ascertaining an arm’s length price. It involves the direct price comparison for the transaction of a similar product between independent parties. * Comparability Analysis * An uncontrolled transaction is comparable to a controlled transaction for purposes of the CUP method if one of the following conditions is met: * None of the differences (if any) between the transactions being compared or between the enterprises undertaking those transactions could materially affect the price in the open market; or * Reasonably accurate adjustments can be made to eliminate the material effects of such differences. * An MNE using the CUP method to determine its transfer price must first identify all the differences between its product and that of the independent manufacturer. The MNE must then determine whether these differences have a material effect on the price, and adjust the price of products sold by the independent manufacturer to reflect these differences, to arrive at an arm’s length price. A comparability analysis under the CUP method should consider amongst others the following: * Product characteristics such as physical features and quality. * If the product is in the form of services, the nature and extent of such services provided. * Whether the goods sold are compared at the same points in the production chain. * Product differentiation in the form of patented features...

Words: 1266 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

2012 Global Pricing System, Transfer Pricing

...GLOBAL TRANSFER PRICING SERVICES Global Transfer Pricing Review kpmg.com TAX © 2012 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved. Contents Introduction Country Snapshots Country Overviews Glossary of Terms Find out more 2 4 10 255 256 © 2012 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved. 2 | Global Transfer Pricing Review Introduction © 2012 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. All rights reserved. Introduction | 3 As multinational companies continue to globalize their supply chains, transfer pricing is increasingly at the forefront of business transformation initiatives. Organizations recognize that transfer pricing strategies can add significant value to business projects and help fund future growth as they look to maximize efficiencies and minimize their global tax liabilities. The transfer pricing environment is constantly changing, in terms of both risks and opportunities. Multinational companies...

Words: 144636 - Pages: 579

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing Methods

...1. Introduction Transfer Pricing is becoming highly important as soon as a multicorporate enterprise or business is structured across borders. Transfer Pricing deals with structuring international transfer prices within a multicorporate enterprise or business, in particular the evaluation of tangible and intangible assets be-tween business entities within the same multicorporate organisation or, more specifically, the price one segment (subunit, department, division and so on) of one organisation charges for a product or service supplied to an-other segment of the same organisation. Every multicorporate enterprise or business aims at minimising its tax obligations in order to maximise its overall profits. In principal, multicorporate businesses have to pay tax in their respective host countries, based on the share of their profit which arises in (or is allotted to) the respective business in such host country. These host countries can be different in various respects e.g. tax systems, customs duties, currency exchange rates, legislation and so forth. As a result, Transfer Pricing also affects revenue and customs authorities, investors, creditors and alike. The obligation to comply with national and international tax regulations regularly conflicts with the goal of a tax-efficient allocation of profits within a multi-national entities on the one hand and the respective tax legislation which is primarily nationally-focused on the other hand. Thus, an anticipatory business...

Words: 686 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Mcs Transfer Pricing

...The Fuqua School of Business Duke University International Strategy: WBA 434 Professors Heath, Huddart, & Slotta Transfer Pricing 1. Overview An essential feature of decentralized firms is responsibility centers (e.g., cost-, profit-, revenue-, or investment-centers). The performance of these responsibility centers is evaluated on the basis of various accounting numbers, such as standard cost, divisional profit, or return on investment (as well as on the basis of other non-accounting measures, like market share). One function of the management accounting system therefore is to attach a dollar figure to transactions between different responsibility centers. The transfer price is the price that one division of a company charges another division of the same company for a product transferred between the two divisions. The basic purpose of transfer pricing is to induce optimal decision making in a decentralized organization (i.e., in most cases, to maximize the profit of the organization as a whole). Profit Center : Any sub-unit of an organization that is assigned both revenues and expenses. In a profit center, a manager is treated as an entrepreneur. Typically, a profit center manager is given decision-making power and is held responsible for the profits generated by her center. 2. 2.1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Decentralization Advantages • Decisions are better and more timely because of the manager’s proximity to local conditions. • Top managers are not distracted...

Words: 2209 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Impact of Transfer Pricing on Corporate Disclosues

...The Impact of Transfer Pricing on Corporate Disclosures Written By: Roger Hsueh Aiming to plug tax collection leaks, impose reasonable tax burdens and bring Taiwan in line with the international trend, toward the end of 2004 the Ministry of Finance issued and put into effect "Income Tax Audit Standards for Transfer Pricing Inconsistent with Arm’s Length Transactions". Following the implementation of the transfer pricing audit standards, not only will the taxation authorities be able to investigate back five years to see if corporate income taxes were consistent with “arm’s length” transactions; henceforth the burden of proof will have shifted from the National Tax Administration to corporations. Corporations will have to furnish evidence on their own behalf to prove their transactions are consistent with arm’s length ones, furnishing the relevant documents. As a result of this, thousands of entities - affiliated companies, parts of corporate groups, foreign businesses in Taiwan, and factories set up in Mainland China - face heavy tax risk on their “related party transactions”. And for public companies, because of their larger scale of operations and the ease of obtaining their regularly issued financial statements, the disclosures in public company financial statements prescribed by the transfer pricing audit standards will have a major impact. As provided in “Guidelines Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers”, when a public company prepares...

Words: 3479 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Cost Based Transfer Pricing

...are assembled along with other parts. The other parts have a combined cost of $450 per pump variable cost, and $900 fixed cost. The assembled TA24 machine is then sold for a price of $2,500 per pump. The Vancouver division also knows that a Toronto-based company is willing to sell heart pumps to Miliken at a price of $425 per pump. Following are the three methods for transfer prices that can be considered in this scenario: 1. Market-based — Vancouver can buy the pumps at an outside price of $425. file:///F|/Courses/2009-10/CGALU/MA2/06course/01mod/m06t02.htm file:///F|/Courses/2009-10/CGALU/MA2/06course/01mod/m06t02.htm (1 of 3) [05/06/2009 12:18:57 PM] file:///F|/Courses/2009-10/CGALU/MA2/06course/01mod/m06t02.htm 2. Cost-based — The company's senior management considers a cost-based transfer price should be at 125% of full absorption cost. The cost of production is $140 + $70 + 90 = $300 x 1.25 = $375 3. Negotiated — This is negotiated between cost ($375) and market ($425). Assume management splits the difference at $400. Using market-based transfer prices generally leads to the most optimal pricing...

Words: 948 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...Q3: Discuss the concepts of Financial Decision Measures, responsibility accounting, Profit & Investment centers, and highlighting examples relevant to each. • Financial Decision Measures Financial Decisions Financial Decisions are decisions that involve: (1) Determining the proper amount of funds to employ in a firm (2) Selecting projects and capital expenditure analysis (3) Sourcing funds on the most favorable terms possible (4) Managing working capital such as inventory and accounts receivable. Financial Decision Measures There are three fundamental concepts that underlie the process of making many financial decisions.  They are also the three fundamental concepts that determine the economic value of any project, investment, or business organization.  The three concepts are; a) Time Value of Money b) Risk-Return Relationship c) Cash Flows • Responsibility accounting This is an underlying concept of accounting performance measurement systems. The basic idea is that large diversified organizations are difficult, if not impossible to manage as a single segment, thus they must be decentralized or separated into manageable parts. The objective is to assist in the planning and control of a company’s responsibility centers—such as decentralized departments and divisions. These parts, or segments are referred to as responsibility centers that include: a) Revenue centers b) Cost centers c) Profit centers d)...

Words: 1522 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...Accounting 1 Session 1, 2011 Tutorial Week 8 - Transfer pricing Tutorial Questions Overall Theme In previous weeks we have focused our attention on the use of management accounting information for costing purposes (e.g. ABC), processes improvement (e.g. ABM, process analysis), and for budget control (standard cost analysis). This week we switch our attention to another aspect of management accounting by exploring the concept of responsibility accounting. We look at how management accounting system can be designed to encourage desirable (goal-congruent) managerial behaviour and to reflect the autonomous nature of contemporary, de-centralised organisations. In particular, we examine two control mechanisms used in conjunction with the responsibility accounting system, namely, transfer pricing. We will consider how managers determine transfer prices, rationales behind these systems, their benefits and limitations. Along the way we will also consider the impact of interdependencies and why variability can play havoc on management accounting systems. Desired Learning Outcomes and Essential Reading Mowen et. al. (2010): • Chapter 10: p368-374 • Chapter 13: p508-513; p523-535. TOPIC 6 TRANSFER PRICING After completing this topic, you should be able to: • • • • Explain the benefits and costs of decentralisation Explain the benefits of transfer pricing systems Understand the differences between the types of responsibility accounting systems Determine transfer prices using various methods, including:...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...TRANSFER PRICING Pengertian : A transfer price is what one segment of company charges another segment of the same company for the transfer of good or service. The segment may be subsidiaries, departments, branches, or any other part of the overall multinational organization. Secara umum transfer pricing merupakan jumlah harga atas penyerahan barang atau imbalan atas penyerahan jasa yang telah disepakati oleh kedua belah pihak dalam transakasi bisnis financial maupun transaksi lainnya. Dalam suatu grup perusahaan, transfer pricing (sering disebut dengan istilah intercompany pricing, intercorporate pricing, interdivisional pricing atau internal pricing) Secara komersial terdapat beberapa dasar penentuan harga transfer yaitu : a. Cost basis b. Market basis c. Negosiasi d. Arbitrasi e. Ganda Harga transfer yang mendasarkan pada biaya bisa berupa : • Actual variable cost • Actual fixed cost • Standard variable cost • Standard full cost • Average cost • Full cost plus mark up Sehubungan dengan harga transfer, terdapat beberapa ketentuan dalam UU PPh yang mengatur tentang perlakuan harga (pasal 10 (1), pasal 6 (1) dan pasal 18). Implikasi Pajak Transfer pricing dapat melibatkan baik transaksi domestic maupun global. Dari aspek pajak penghasilan, transfer pricing domestic tidak membawa implikasi yang signifikan karena potensi penghasilan kena pajaknya (walau digeser dari satu ke lain badan) masih berada dalam...

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Transfer Pricing

...Internationale Besteuerung Seminararbeit Transfer Pricing in multinationalen Unternehmen Eine integrierte Management- und steuerliche Sicht Sommersemester 2013, 2. Fachsemester Seminarleiter: Prof. Dr. Wolfram F. Richter Betreuer: Dr. Lars Kunze Eingereicht von: Xu, Chen Matrikel-Nr.: 161276 Anschrift: Bunsenstrasse 17, 45145 Essen Telefonnummer: 0176 64736605 E-Mail: chen.xu@tu-dortmund.de Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung ................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Problemstellung und Zielsetzung ....................................................................... 2 1.2 Aufbau der Arbeit .............................................................................................. 2 2 Grundlagen des Verrechnungspreises ................................................................... 2 2.1 Wesentliche Grundbegriffe zur Analyse des Verrechnungspreises ................... 2 2.2 Funktion und Ziele des Verrechnungspreises .................................................... 3 2.2.1 Funktion aus der Management-Accounting-Sicht ................................ 3 2.2.2 Funktion aus steuerlicher Sicht ............................................................ 4 2.3 „One Set or two Sets of Books“ ......................................................................... 4 3 Methoden zur Ermittlung angemessener Verrechnungspreise ........................

Words: 5505 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Transfer Pricing

...Corporate Governance – The Evolution Concerned with the mechanisms by which owners have some form of control over managers. The Combined Code was introduced based on the recommendations of the following reports: The Cadbury Report 1992 Recommended a ‘Code of Best Practice’ This was a voluntary code and its main proposals were related to: The composition of company boards The length of directors contracts Disclosure of remuneration packages Auditing matters Greenbury Report 1995 Reinforced the ‘Code of Best Practice’ recommended by Cadbury and made further recommendations regarding matters relating to directors’ remuneration. Hampel Report 1998 ‘Fine tuned’ the above reports. In particular, the points that: The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive should be separate Directors’ contracts should be for one year or less Remuneration committee should be made up of independent non-executive directors Non-executive directors may be paid in company shares although this not recommended A senior non-executive director should be nominated to deal with shareholders’ concerns Directors should be trained The Code proposes principles and code provisions under five headings: Directors Directors’ remuneration Relations with shareholders Accountability and audit Institutional shareholders Further guidance on accountability and audit is contained in the Turnbull Committee Report (1999) ‘Internal Control: Guidance for Directors of Listed Companies incorporated...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

When Cost-Based Transfer Pricing Is Used Between Sub-Units of a Large Organisation, Describe How to Avoid Making Sub-Optimal Decisions

...Generally speaking, cost-based transfer pricing is top management chooses a transfer price based on the costs of producing the intermediate product. For instance, variable production costs, variable and fixed production costs, full costs (including life-cycling costs) as well as some markup. It is useful when market prices are unavailable or too costly to obtain. When a large organisation transfers product across international borders, transfer prices are relevant in the calculation of income taxes, and are sometimes relevant in connection with other international trade and regulatory issues (Horngren, Datar, Foster, Rajan, Lttner, 2009). When transfer prices are based on full cost plus a markup, it may probaly lead to sub-optimal decisions. Since it causes the buying division to regard the fixed costs and the markup of the selling division as a variable cost. Indeed, the buying division may then purchase products from an external supplier expecting savings in costs that will not exist (Horngren, et al, 2009). In a large company, the transfer price is a major factor between manufacturing and distribution divisions. In order to achieve company profit maximization when decentralized segments of a company interact, a transfer pricing system should be established that treats supplying segments as variable cost recovery centers and setup costs are treated as a variable function of run size. This induces optimal run sizing decisions by the producing and purchasing divisions. ...

Words: 600 - Pages: 3