Premium Essay

Assess Readness

In:

Submitted By samuelwashburn
Words 591
Pages 3
Developing strategies
Samuel W.
GEN/200

Mr. Glenn Medeiros

Developing strategies
LEARNING STYLES:
Interpersonal- These individuals are able to interact and find common ground with others by being aware of their actions, moods, or general feelings. They work well in social events and cooperative learning groups and are very good team mates.
Intrapersonal- These individuals are good at self awareness and are generally independent. They are good at reasoning and able to reflect on information. However, they do tend to prefer to work or study alone and enjoy their independence.
Verbal-Linguistic- These individuals are great communicators, either by writing, reading, or speaking. They are able to understand meanings and terms easily and have the ability to analyze things in good detail. They are good teachers.
Effective communication and collaboration between these three types would require using the strengths of each group to asset in the weakness in other groups. There would need good communication between the different types as some of the traits each has could cause strife in the group. The group with Interpersonal, Intrapersonal, and Verbal-Linguistic would be best served to allow them to use their strengths i.e. allow the Interpersonal type to get the group organized to start the task as they are good at communicating and have the ability to see things from other peoples point of view. They would also be good at helping others as they are good teachers. Intrapersonal types would best utilized to help come up with ideas for the project as they have good imaginative abilities along with thinking and reasoning skills. Communication is the key here as Intrapersonal types tend to be more apt to work alone and can express themselves easily. Allowing the Verbal-Linguistic type to control the written or spoken part of the project would bring to bare

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Negotiations Between 364th Expeditionary Sustainment Command and United State Army Reserve Command

...Negotiations between 364th Expeditionary Sustainment Command and United State Army Reserve Command William N. Willhoite Keller Graduate School of Management HRM-595; Negotiation Skills Professor Kenneth Goldsmith 16 December 2012 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction Page 3 A. Background Information Page 3 Parties involved in Negotiations Page 4 Mission of the Mobilization Augmentation Page 5 Section 2: Field Analysis of the Constituents Page 7 Section 3: Negotiation Goals and Strategies Page 10 Section 4: Conclusion Page 13 Section 5: References Page 14 Negotiations between 364th Expeditionary Sustainment Command and United State Army Reserve Command This paper is a discussion on the negotiations between the 364th Expeditionary Sustainment Command (364th ESC) and the United States Army Reserve Command (USARC) over the number of Army Reserve Soldiers that will be allowed to augment the headquarters of the 364th ESC for the purpose of assisting Army Reserve units preparing to mobilize onto active duty and demobilizing from active duty. Background The 364th ESC has participated in an Army Reserves has a program that has been operational since the 364th ESC’s establishment in 2010, that allows general officer commands to add additional staff to their authorized full time manning for the express purpose of assisting deploying units prepare...

Words: 2606 - Pages: 11