Free Essay

Bric Report


Submitted By dev555
Words 4264
Pages 18
BRIC is used in economics to refer to the combination of Brazil, Russia, India, and China which make up over 42% of the world's population. These nations are going to play a major role in the future of global economy.
BRIC or BRICs are terms used in economics to refer to the combination of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. General consensus is that the term was first prominently used in a thesis of the Goldman Sachs investment bank. The main point of this 2003 paper was to argue that the economies of the BRICs are rapidly developing and by the year 2050 will eclipse most of the current richest countries of the world.

Goldman Sachs argues that the economic potential of Brazil, Russia, India, and China is such that they may become among the four most dominant economies by the year 2050. The thesis was proposed by Jim O'Neill, global economist at Goldman Sachs. These countries are forecast to encompass over thirty-nine percent of the world's population.

Goldman Sachs predicts China and India, respectively, to be the dominant global suppliers of manufactured goods and services while Brazil and Russia would become similarly dominant as suppliers of raw materials. Cooperation is thus hypothesized to be a logical next step among the BRICs because Brazil and Russia together form the logical commodity suppliers to India and China. Thus, the BRICs have the potential to form a powerful economic bloc to the exclusion of the modern-day G8 status. Brazil is dominant in soy and iron ore while Russia has enormous supplies of oil and natural gas. Goldman Sachs' thesis thus documents how commodities, work, technology, and companies have diffused outward from the United States across the world.

The Brics’ role in the global economy

1. Where do they come from and what are the Brics?

In demographic terms, BRIC holds the world’s two most populated countries and another two with considerable populations. China alone holds a fifth of the world’s population, and is closely followed by India (17.5%) and, by a larger gap Brazil (2.9%) and Russia (2.2%). Despite their large territories – Russia’s 17 million km2, India’s 3.2 million km2, China’s 9.3 million km2 and Brazil’s 8.5 million km2 –, the Brics differ from each other in terms of natural resources, level of industrialization and impact on the global economy. It is important to point out these differences, as definition as a bloc might lead to wrongful assumptions about the four countries’ individual current and future roles in the global economy. In order to be accurate about each country’s actual weight in the world, we should perhaps change the acronym to CIRB (but without the glamour of the name). Let us begin with China, which is the most continuous civilization in history – not strictly in terms of political linearity but rather in terms of cultural continuity. The country has a tragic contemporary history, marked by economic decadence, political instability, military humiliation and social regression caused by a deep degradation of the social fabric after Mao Zedong’s economic follies created a human hecatomb and a demographic “gap” of tens of millions of people. India is the world’s second oldest “continuous” civilization – the inverted commas are to highlight the country’s cultural and ethnic diversity. India has no cultural unity as such, and its political history only seems to make sense when we look at it as a temporary “unit” created by foreign invasions, specifically by the Mughal Empire, followed by the domination of an English trading company which was then converted into British supremacy over several peoples who were very different to each other. Modern India is an invention of the British Empire.
Russia is also ancient, with cultural traditions that have made it into a cultural unit since the Middle Ages, when barbarian migrations led to the creation of a proto-homogenous Slavic proto-nation. This took place when Peter the Great subjugated feudal authority and consolidated his power over an undefined territory, drawn together under an insipient State based on imperial absolutism. This State expanded between the 18th and the 20th centuries, when it reached the height of its territorial size and power under the rule of the Soviet Czars. The Soviet Empire was a paradox in Russia’s trajectory. Despite achieving the national security it had always aspired to, it also created an irrational economic system that ended up causing the State’s structural crisis and thunderous downfall.

Finally there is Brazil, a typical colonial creation, with the slow implementation of a successful economy contrasting with a more precocious State building. Brazil’s unified State came before the consolidation of an integrated economy. The State was the inducer of an industrial economy, which is quite modern compared with other peripheral countries. Brazil is happy with its geographical division and regional relations. This context of regional peace – at least since the end of the Paraguayan War (1865-1870) – and of a lack of real external threats are defining factors behind Brazil’s geopolitical singularity and should be considered as a positive asset for regional and international inclusion. The Brics’ itinerary over the past two centuries has been uneven and at times divergent. Reciprocal relations over the last half-century have been marginal, with the possible exception of the former Soviet Union (USSR) and China during the early implementation of socialism in the latter. Although the path of the Brics’ interaction with the global economy has been erratic, there has been some convergence over the past two decades complemented by incremental reciprocal integration. The Brics’ individual participation in global capital, trade, investment and technology flows retreated over the two centuries between the First Industrial Revolution and the eighth decade of the 20th century. As of the 1980’s, the four countries resumed a more intense interaction with the global economy. This retreat was born both by the Brics’ own decisions – socialist revolutions in Russia and China, the adoption of state planning in India – and was involuntary, as in the case of Brazil where crises prompted nationalizing introversion (the 1929 crisis and the depression of the 1930’s as stimuli for national industrialization). During the construction of a post-Second World War world economic order, both the USSR and China excluded themselves from the global capitalist system’s institutions – the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Brazil and India adhered to these bodies in a reluctant and marginal manner. Although Brazil has been active in these bodies of capitalist interdependence, its participation has been more as a client than as an important party in decision-making processes, which until a short while ago were far beyond its capabilities. More than any other BRIC member, Brazil has kept a market structure and an economic management model in line with capitalism’s formal pattern of economic organization. India, the other BRIC member that remained capitalist during the Cold War, was much more nationalizing, bureaucratic and backward than Brazil. India’s recent modernizing boost has largely come from its economic Diaspora in the US rather than from internal transformations (but there has been liberalization under Manmohan Singh). China was an economic disaster. This is not only due to decadence during the Civil War and the Japanese invasion, but also due to the plans of the Maoist Era (the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution). Suffice to say that in gross terms, between the end of the 18th century and the 1960’s, China’s GDP fell from nearly one third of the world’s GDP to less than 5%, and only managed to recover in the 2000’s. Regarding Russia, in addition to its reduction after the collapse of the USSR, statistics from the Soviet Era are not reliable enough to establish the development of its performance in the 20th century, when the country underwent huge material and human disasters. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) always overestimated the industrial power and technological capacity of this enormous Potemkin village, which lived an institutionalized lie over seven decades. The reincorporation of the Brics’ into the mainstream global economy as of the eighth decade of the 20th century happened differently for each member. Although Brazil was never excluded from the global economy as such, until the mid-80’s almost 95% of domestic supply came from local industry, as a result of strong state protectionism. India took state capitalism even further, which, along with its extensive planning, was responsible for decades of reduced growth and low levels of modernization. It was China, in fact, which sparked the big transformation in the global division of labor by redrawing the global direct investment map via Deng Xiao-Ping’s reforms. Russia reconverted to Mafia-style capitalism in the 1990’s and became more of an energy raw-material supplier than an active player in the global economy. Brazil has become a major supplier of food and mineral commodities; India has consolidated its presence in the information technology sector; and industrial China has become the leading manufacturer of mass consumer products, especially electronic goods. Everyone has benefitted from the Ricardian advantages, with a special emphasis on labor in China’s case, technology in India’s and natural resources in Brazil and Russia’s. And where are the Brics heading over the coming decades? Certainly not to the same destination, even though their trajectories have a common thread of growing and unavoidable adhesion to the global economy. According to a study by Goldman Sachs, this G4 group’s joint GDP will exceed the G7’s current GDP by 2035, and China’s will exceed everyone, individually, by 2040. The factors behind this performance are very diverse: a probable technological “explosion” in China; the continuity of Russia’s extraction activities; and huge competitiveness in Brazilian agriculture and in Indian internet services and information technology – the latter of which is already taking place. Although the Brics’ joint atomic mass might overtake G7, in per capita terms their well-being and productivity indicators will remain below the developed countries’.

What is the Brics relationship with the global economy?
Economic transformation is the result of a combination of structural and politically based factors. Russia and China sunk in the destructive chaos of their socialist economies through the charismatic force of their original leaders. Despite being efficient when it came to party organization, these leaders – Lenin and Mao – were unable to grasp the way in which a modern market economy works. In Russia’s case, the transition to capitalism has remained erratic, whilst China has seen a combination of political authoritarianism and firm guidance towards a market economy. China is unique in world history in terms of its sustained growth, with structural transformations that have an enormous social impact. In the case of Brazil and India, transformations have been due less to a directed “return to the market” or “revolutions from above” than to the “deep forces” of their semicapitalist regimes, whose creative energy was released by economic opening and trade liberalization. Brazil’s central problem was to break with self-feeding inflation and the pernicious effects of exchange rate pressures. This process was conducted in full, despite the financial turbulence that threatened an adjustment between the second half of the 1990s and the beginning of the 2000s. India, meanwhile, had to lift itself from a Mesozoic state of planned economy and over-zealous protectionism. Although it faced some delays, this process was facilitated by a high-quality economic Diaspora in the main developed economies – a phenomenon that also took place in Chinese history, but with different characteristics.

Strictly speaking, China seems to have reproduced – at a higher adaptation pace and with the huge ambition of rapidly recovering from the lost decades of crippling socialism – the Japanese experience of the Meiji Revolution. It has sent its offspring to learn from the scientific and technological leaders of advanced capitalism. Above all, China has focused on the Japanese post WWII miracle, in which the country copied and adapted Western knowhow with extreme care and quality, in order to make the same products with its own designs and brands. China is the only emerging nation among all the Brics that seems destined to convert itself into a dominant economy, as well as a technological and military power. However, the country is still very far from offering its citizens – many of whom are still subjects of an authoritarian regime – the level of individual well-being enjoyed by the populations in advanced capitalist countries.

Russia has lost territories with important natural and human resources and therefore does not seem close to recovering the political and strategic relevance enjoyed during the height of its geopolitical expansion at the end of the 1970s. Despite owning a formidable nuclear arsenal and the capacity for some military projection, the country is in no condition to challenge the two global economic giants of the mid-21st century. Russia’s resources are finite and its demography is declining, albeit having a high quality human force. India, for its part, is apt to master, with competence, the electronic services it already offers with expertise. It will, however, have to absorb into the market economy hundreds of millions of rural workers stagnating in an ancestral economy. Brazil has almost a generation ahead of it to benefit from a demographic bonus, namely the best possible relationship between the economically active and dependent strata of people. This opportunity will probably be missed, largely because of the low levels of technical qualification and education among the population, which will reduce productivity gains.
These shortcomings should not prevent the Brics from gaining greater relevance, which they will through their heavy demographic weight and growing consumer market, with the possible exception of Russia. But they will be unable to reach the levels of technological excellence of nearly all of the countries of the advanced capitalist world. Once again, the exception should be China, which will reproduce Taiwan and South Korea’s technological performance with surprising rapidity.
In the case of liberalizing capital movements and trade policy, Bric approaches tend to vary, although tending towards the adoption of a pattern more propitious to those countries’ international economic integration. This is in contrast to the restrictive policies adopted by all of these countries less than a generation ago. The most important ruptures took place, obviously, with the two socialist giants, as in contrast Brazil and India were on the edges of a capitalism characterized by an overwhelming state presence. These latter two countries were founding members of GATT and were there at the very start of the Bretton Woods institutions, without having to necessarily take on their prescriptions for economic policy.

China and Russia joined the IMF and IRBD as soon as they overcame ideological restrictions to these symbols of the capitalist world, but the process was more complicated in the trade sphere. It took 14 years for China to be admitted to GATT, something that took place only just before the Doha Round (2001) began. It still maintained some practices at odds with normal trading relations. Russia, while politically accepted into the G7 and fully recognized as a market economy since the Kananaskis (2002) G7 summit, has been unable to meet the demands required to be accepted into the multilateral trading system. Neither does it appear close to entrance into the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Its recent resumption of a muscular foreign policy could push it even further from these organizations. Over the decades, Brazil and India have maintained the typical pattern of
“developmentalist” policy prescribed by Keynesian economists like Raul Prebisch and Gunnar Myrdal. This meant a lot of monetary profligacy, exchange restrictions, trade protectionism, and discriminatory measures against foreign investments. These policies began to change at the end of the 1980s and the start of the 1990s. The countries still have a defensive trade policy in the industrial area but, thanks to information and communications technologies, India has opened up its service sector, while Brazil has proved more hands-on in combating farm subsidies and protectionism (which should include Brazil’s G20 allies China and India).
The monetary, trade and foreign investments policies of the Brics are as varied as their forms of global insertion, but the results are reflected in current accounts. Brazil came out of a quite fragile situation between the second half of the 1990s and the beginning of the 2000s – which prompted it to seek preventive financing through three agreements with the IMF (1998, 2001 and 2002) – into a relatively comfortable international position of foreign reserves higher than foreign debt. With its huge trade surpluses, China is on the way to further record currency reserves, and should remain as a dynamic exporter in the foreseeable future.
Russia’s trade surpluses are either growing or comfortable, but its structural position is fragile due to its dependency on oil and gas. India’s deficits, despite rising, are manageable in relation to its also growing economy. All those scenarios should suffer the impact of the international financial crisis started in the U.S., but emerging economies are expected to maintain a higher rate of growth than those of OECD group.

3. What will be Brics’ future impact on the global economy?
The justification for the Bric acronym, according to its original proponent, is the extent to which these economies have an impact on the global economy, as well as their capacity to shape the future of other developing nations. Barring Brazil, with very modest growth rates over the last years, the three other Brics have been gaining weight and importance globally and within sectors.
In theory, in a few years the Brics will represent a fifth of the global economy and in two decades will overtake the G7. This aggregation of individual volume might make sense in this type of intellectual exercise, in which arithmetic seems to prevail over politics. However, it is unlikely to indicate global economic development trends, as these are caused by technological transformation and capital, scientific and strategic information flows – as shown by the history of capitalism.
In fact, given their demographic importance and the growing dissemination of technology and direct investment, we could say that developing countries’ share in global goods and services exports and GDP will certainly rise above current levels. This is an elementary conclusion that adds nothing to the other aspects – especially institutional and political – that interact with the structural forces that shape the global system. Basically, despite the Bric’s decisive economic impact, this feature by itself says nothing about the other factors behind a complex relationship that goes beyond GDP and exports, and into reciprocal interdependency – not between the Brics but between each of them and their various economic partners. From this point of view, the Brics group do not have an economic existence per se and is purely a creation of the “economic spirit”.
Despite arguments about the decoupling of the main emerging economies from the G7 and other developed nations’ economic cycles, the truth is that the dominant economies’ impact on Bric is more decisive than normally admitted. It is not only about consumer markets and direct investment sources. The global economy is not just an economic space for the exchange of goods and services, where each nation can have greater or lesser “physical” interaction. It is, essentially, an arena for the exchange of ideas, in which the intellectual domination of the so-called developed Western world looks set to remain throughout the foreseeable future.
When we look at the overall picture for the global economy, we reach an inevitable conclusion: the same forces that have transformed the world since the 16th century are still shaping the contemporary world. These forces include not only the flow of goods and services, but forms of economic organization and above all, the production of ideas and concepts to support those physical flows. Therefore, it is inconceivable to consider that developing or emerging nations could be independent from the core of the global economy.
The path and economic destination of the Brics and other emerging economies cannot be different from those followed by developed nations. The latter set the basic parameters on which the economy is based. However, this dynamic process is not exclusive to a specific center, but shared by several centers producing and spreading ideas and practical knowledge. The apparently novel concept of Bric is a trouvaille that has occupied journalists’ minds and instigated the imagination of academics in their search for new ideas. This concept seems to induce those concerned with the old hegemony to seek a rupture with and the replacement of an “old system”. It is historically rare to have peaceful attempts to change the balance of world power, as the beneficiaries of the status quo tend to resist the contesters’ demands for a new space in the old order. If these expectations are not met, the new contestants could opt for changing this order by their own initiative – hopefully through peaceful ways, but if necessary, they will try through violence.
Once the fascist contesters of the inter-war period were contained, defeated and radically transformed, the geopolitics of world power began, as of 1947, to be dominated by Soviet expansionism without direct confrontations with the US. Conflicts took place often via proxies, with each side advancing and retreating in peripheral arenas where the crucial aspects of the great game were being played. This “Third World War” ended without the conservative hegemon winning a victory; the defeat of the economically weaker side was actually brought about by the implosion of a senile socialism that was incapable of competing in terms of productive efficiency. After the USSR’s spectacular demise and in a moment in which the US emerged as the only superpower, the world seems to be moving towards a transition. This new stage sees the US’ decline and China’s ascendance, the reaffirming of Russia’s strength or the emergence of new players (India, Brazil, the European Union), which could redistribute the cards in new strategic scenarios.
Whatever the future of global geopolitics in the 21st century – be it a new Cold War of a “Cold Peace” – it has nothing to do with being a member of a group invented by an economist, even though there might be conflicts generated by some of these members’ candidacy as emerging global powers. The Bric’s situation is accidental and fortuitous, whereas being a global emerging economy is a structural condition that was acquired by a long and slow process of productive and technological qualifications that will naturally convert into military and political power.
Bric’s two former socialists have authoritarian characteristics that represent a legacy of centuries of totalitarian states. The other two members have had democratic trajectories - with faults in terms of functioning and social justice – and are the market economies closest to capitalist organization patterns. Of all the members, Brazil has the most advanced capitalist structures and the most modern society. It is also the most integrated society in language, cultural, ethnic and possibly religious terms, which in principle enables a more efficient political administration - without institutional ruptures - and more favorable conditions for modernization. Although social democratization can slow growth and adaptation to new environments, it also contributes to greater cohesion around national goals.
The main issues dividing the world today are no longer ideological, as they were less than three decades ago, when competing projects were trying to win peoples’ hearts and minds. Neither are they technical, as there seems to be reasonable consensus and collaboration among the world’s researchers and scientists about the challenges of medicine, physics and biology. Today’s main dilemmas are about political priorities and alternative economic measures to be chosen by heads-of-state for solving the age-old problems that afflict mankind: hunger, unemployment, health, education, security and welfare. Experience in the recent past about these choices and attempts to impose them on whole societies in an authoritarian manner, does not reflect well on some of the solutions proposed by radical challengers to the status quo. We do not have to go back to the terrible example of Nazi Germany or militaristic Japan to conclude that emerging powers tend to be hasty competitors ready to use violence if necessary to challenge the power of older hegemons. That History lesson must have been learned, however. Let us hope this time it will be different.

Macro Graph Dump: BRIC - 18 Sep 2011

Here's a couple BRIC [Brazil Russia India China] economic charts, and a few throw-away thoughts on emerging markets in general.

1. BRIC Y/Y GDP Growth
Over to GDP, the BRICs bounced back strongly from the great recession. China took a small hit, but charged back with large scale stimulus. India was more or less unscathed on its growth path. Brazil took a decent hit, but has subsequently returned to pre-crisis growth rates. Meanwhile Russia took a significant hit with the collapse of the commodity bubble and is still struggling to get back to pre-crisis levels as it takes on significant economic challenges. However, while the medium term outlook may be less than certain, the fundamentals still support the long term growth story. Also, while the pattern was similar to that of the developed markets' experience, on a relative basis emerging markets got off lightly.
The BRIC economies have made an obvious bounce-back from the GFC, but the notables are Russia and Brazil. Russia has seen certain less sustainable bits of its economy falter and is currently sustaining growth at sub-pre-crisis levels. Brazil got a good boost thanks mostly to the low base comparator effect and is settling into more normal growth... India and China are powering along as per usual.

Similar Documents

Free Essay


...BRIC is an acronym standing for Brazil, Russia, India and China. Although can be categorized by importance of countries, it would be CIRB which is China, India, Russia and Brazil. The BRIC are both the fastest growing and largest emerging markets economies. These four countries encompass more than quarter of the world’s land area and in 2009 accounted for more than 40% of world’s population, 40% of the world’s foreign exchange reserves and 25% of world’s GDP. The states, which were earlier, accepted to consider as developing countries of Third world, promptly become economic giants of the new world. BRIC: Brazil, Russia, India and China – four markets everyone with the unique features, but thus unites them the potential generated by changes in political systems of these countries. As a result of these changes there was a consumer demand, which is formed by 43% of the population of the whole world. In roughly developing countries of BRIC there are five of the ten largest cities of planet where concentrated the huge amount of capital and millions of consumers who are aspiring up on social and economic ladder. The term BRIC was included into a business lexicon in 2003 after the economist of Goldman Sachs investment bank Jim O'Neill described future economic picture of the world. In his opinion, by 2050 the economic capacity of these four countries will allow them to become dominating economies, and to surpass in scales not only economy of the USA, but also economy of all of the...

Words: 2479 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Assignment on Bric

...Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” Case Study | ITB 301Section: 3Spring 2012Submitted to:Salma AkterLecturerDepartment of Business Administration.East West University, Dhaka.Submitted byArafat Rauf2009-2-10-345Date of Submission: 28th March 2012 | Letter of Transmittal March 28, 2012 Salma Akter, Senior lecturer East West University Subject: Submission of Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” case study Dear Madam, I have prepared an Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” case study. It was an energizing experience throughout the semester and preparing this assignment further enhanced my insight about International Business. I hope that this report fulfils your requirements and your feedback is very much necessary to overcome my faults and lacking. This will help me in my entire life. It is my pleasure to carry out this assignment under your supervision. I would like to request you to accept my report for further assessment and I will be available to answer any question for clarification. Thank you for your sincere support. Yours sincerely, Arafat Rauf 2009-2-10-345 Table of contents Title | Page number | - BRIC | 4 | Economic growth of BRIC | 7 | Question 1: Map the proposed sequence of the evolution of the economy of the BRIC’s. What indicators might companies monitor to guide their investments and organize their local market operations? | 8 | Question 2: What are the implications of the emergence of the BRICs for careers and companies in your country? | 8...

Words: 2774 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Meet the Bricks

... BRIC 2 Economic growth of BRIC 4 Question 1: Map the proposed sequence of the evolution of the economy of the BRICs. What indicators might companies monitor to guide their investments and organize their local market operations? 5 Question 2: What are the implications of the emergence of the BRICs for careers and companies in your country? 5 Question 3: Do you think recency bias has led to overestimating the potential of the BRICs? How would you, as a manager for a company assessing these markets, try to control this bias? 6 Question 4: How might managers interpret the potential for their product in a market that is, in absolute economic terms, large but, on a per capita basis, characterized by a majority of poor to very poor consumers? 6 Question 5: In the event that the BRICs fail to meet projected performance, what would be some of the implications for international business? 6 Question 6: Compare and contrast the merits of GNI per capita versus the idea of purchasing power parity, human development, and green economics as indicators of economic potential in Brazil, Russia, China, and India. 7 Conclusion 8 Reference 9 “BRIC” BRIC is a grouping acronym that refers to the countries of Brazil. Russia. India and China, which are all deemed to be at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development. It is typically rendered as "the BRICs" or "the BRIC countries" or "the BRIC economies" or alternatively as the "Big Four" BRICS is an...

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Free Essay


...Institute of Professional Education and Research, Bhopal Business Environment Report on BRIC 2050 India performance and status Submitted To: Submitted By: Prof. (Dr.) Resham Chopra Bharat Naryani Priyank Ajmera BRIC BRIC are the acronym used to refer to the combination of the four biggest emerging-market countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. According to Wikipedia BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) is a coalition of regional and superpowers reportedly proposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Predictions & Projections: Economists argued that, given sound political decision-making and good luck, the BRIC economies together could become larger than those of the world’s six most developed countries in less than 40 years. i.e BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China together would be larger than G6 (G7 excluding Canada) in USD in less than 40 years. Of the current G6, only the US and Japan may be among the six largest economies in US dollar terms in 2050. It is projected that  the Brics to account for close to 40 per cent of global GDP by 2050 and to have become four of the world’s top five economies. It is projected that the Brics’ rise in absolute terms will push them up to the top of the global leaderboard, in per capita GDP their performance will not be quite so impressive. Reasons why India will rise: 1) Manufacturing productivity will drive growth. It’s performance will improve due to globalisation and increased competition...

Words: 1522 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

China Economic Article from Goldman Sachs

... In the eyes of Jim O'Neil, managing director and head of Goldman Sachs Global Economic Research, the global crisis has only been a blessing for China, accelerating the global power shift from the West to the East. O'Neil, based in London, coined the acronym BRIC to refer to the fast growing developing economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China. "I think China has had a really good crisis in some ways. It has been good for them, as it forced them to stop being so dependent on exports. I think our 2050 'dream' scenario for BRIC has become more likely, rather than less, since the crisis. The trend growth in Brazil and India seems to be rising also," O'Neil told The Korea Times. According to a Goldman Sachs report, China will dominate the global economy in 2050 with a GDP of $70 trillion, followed by the U.S., India, Brazil and Russia. "I think the likelihood of China challenging the number one spot of the U.S. has actually risen, as now China's growth is going to be determined by domestic forces and the rise of consumption, so it is more sustainable," he said. "On our latest long-term estimates, we think that China might overtake the U.S. by 2027 (in terms of GDP), and with it, the combined GDP of the BRIC countries will become bigger than that of the G7," he added. The veteran economist forecast that the U.S. financial market and dollar will start losing their dominant positions in the global financial market a decade from now. "I think the U.S. financial...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

International Marketing

...Research Paper Abstract Globalization has not only opened up new avenues for MNEs, but has also benefitted the emerging nations who have adapted to it. It has formed the basis of growth and development for most emerging nations of course other factors too are relevant). This research paper seeks to examine the international marketing strategies of MNEs in the automobile industry, specifically for the emerging nations, because as our subsequent findings will prove, that these markets are currently the most promising and will remain so at least for a few years to come. When we consider the emerging nations, the most promising ones are obviously the BRICs (reasons covered in the following sections). Hence, for readability and convenience purposes, we have limited our research to these nations. Keywords: Marketing strategy, BRIC, TRIAD, MNE, emerging markets, JV Objectives of Study: 1) International Marketing strategies followed by automotive companies in Emerging markets. 2) The study also aims at understanding whether the marketing strategy of these global automotive companies are justified by analysing its impact on the key statistically significant numbers of a company, i.e. the net profit, sales, operating income and the market share. Introduction MNEs continuously strive to grow, and they need better opportunities in doing so. The automobile industry has been proven to be one of the most promising and stable industries in the world. While the developed...

Words: 4313 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Research Proposal

...Research proposal of Project report on “Wealth management” Company: Ing Vysya bank ltd. * Objectives of Research 1. To study banking products and services 2. To study Wealth Management of ING Vysya Bank Ltd. 3. To propose different products for different kinds of customers as per their demographic characteristics. 4. To prepare a risk profile of customers. 5. To participate in promotional activities organise by bank. 6. To analyze whether Indian economic development is creating a broad and competitive wealth management market in India. 7. To discuss the factors that have acted as facilitators and obstructions for the growth of wealth management market in India. 8. From the above three objectives, to derive the potentiality and the future prospect of the wealth management industry in India. * Research Design During the tenure of the internship we are going to use Descriptive type of research design. Descriptive Research, also known as statistical research, describes data and characteristics about the population or phenomenon being studied. Descriptive research answers the questions who, what, where, and how…. Descriptive Research deals with everything that can be counted and studied. The description is used for frequencies, averages and other statistical calculations. Often the best approach, prior to write descriptive research, is to conduct a survey investigation. 1. What: I am going to meet existing customer...

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Global Business Operation

...GLOBAL BUSINSESS OPERATION ADEGBENRO ELEWADE MIB 34- 130226 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT QUESTION- You have been employed as a business consultant to advise a company manufacturing smart phones who wishes to explore the potential of doing business in one Latin American emerging market. You must produce a report that identifies the key issues that the company will face in your chosen market and secondly offer expert advice to attain business success in that market. CONTENTS- 1. Introduction. 2. View of Brazil’s economy. 3. Brazil as a BRICS Economy. 4. Market for smart phones in Brazil. 5. Using the porter’s five forces to analyse the market for smart phones in Brazil. 6. Competitors existing in the market. 7. How to enter the market. 8. Constraints to success for the company (using PESTLE model). 9. How to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. 1. INTRODUCTION The Cost (this involves the legal cost, corruption, lack of infrastructure), Benefits (size of the economy or economy growth),Risk (political-social unrest, economic mis-management) analysis has been used to analyse the favourable emerging market in Latin America which is Brazil. The main reasons for choosing this market will discussed in details. 2. OVERVIEW OF BRAZIL’S ECONOMY The chosen market is BRAZIL which is an emerging market and also the largest of the Latin American nations and the second largest in the western hemisphere with...

Words: 2630 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Fed Feeds India

...SPECIAL REPORT ON EMERGING MARKETS White Paper Special Report On Emerging Markets ABSTRACT This paper examines the four emerging economies- Brazil, India, Russia and China (BRIC) - that are expected to play an increasingly important role in the global economy in the coming decades. These four countries have come to symbolize the exciting challenges and opportunities presented by dynamic emerging markets. The first part of the report outlines key features of these economies and their growing contribution to world output and trade. The second part analyses the contribution of India towards the same. By 2050, the BRIC economies will account for 44% of global GDP. The emerging market accounts for an increasing share of global activity. Two centuries of vigorous industrialization has propelled economies of North America, Western Europe and Japan into a dominant position in terms of their share of world output. But the past three decades have seen steady erosion from the peak they attained during the 1970. The emerging economies now account for over half of world output. These dynamic economies are changing the world economic order as they industrialize, improve their infrastructure and rapidly develop their service sectors. By 2050, they will account for almost 78% of global output. This projection uses realistic assumptions of annual growth rates of 5.3% to 2050, well below those posted in recent decades by the economies of developing Asia at over...

Words: 1660 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Internacionalización Roca

...Indicadores Económicos: BRICS Y CIVETS | Sudáfrica | Turquía | Índice de Libertad Económica | 74º 61,8 | 69º 62,9 | Doing Business | 41 Más fácil pagar impuestos Starting Business 64 Getting Electricity 150 Trading across borders 106 Protecting investors 10 | 69 (Trinidad y Tobago) Conseguir Dificultó la instauración de una nueva empresa al aumentar el requerimiento de K y aumentar los impuestos sobre los traspasos de la propiedad.(+) Protegen + a los inversores. Starting Business 93 Getting Electricity 49 TAB 86 Protecting Investors 32 | CDU | | | Global Competitiveness Report | Pop 53 GDP 350 Per Capita 6620,72 Instituciones 36 Infraestructuras (ICEX) Goods Market Eficiency 32 Labor Market Efficiency 113 Financial market development 7 Exports sobre gdp 92 Business sophistication 31 Local supplier quality 38 Production process sophistication 38 Innovation 43 | Pop 76,5 GDP 827 Per Capita 10815 Instituciones 64 Goods market eficiency 43 Labor market efficiency 131 Financial market development 58 Exports sobre gdp 118 Business sophistication 50 Local supplier quality 49 Production process sophistication 36 Turquía 56 | DHL (Conectividad) | 54 | 59 | FMI | Crecimiento Impresionante últimos 20 años. Ahora jodidos pero NDP. Muestra de ello CIVETS y BRICS. South Africa en 2010. | Current account and fiscal imbalances that can lead to a sudden stop. | COFACE | * A4 * Economic and political power * Natural resources (gold...

Words: 757 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Emerging Market

...Emerging Economy Report, the Center for Knowledge Societies defines Emerging Economies as those "regions of the world that are experiencing rapid informationalization under conditions of limited or partial industrialization." The notion of the author/ in simple terms with regards to emerging markets is that it is a particular economy which stands ahead of developing economies with more attractive economic and political conditions and institutional framework leading to potential business opportunities. According to Brandes (2014), “Emerging markets are no longer the uncharted markets they were in the past—they are advancing economies with growth opportunities and continually improving economic and political conditions”. The trend of emerging markets up surged from late 1990’s when 73% of developing countries outpaced America. The most impressive growth was reported in four biggest emerging economies; namely, Brazil, Russia, India and China which were abbreviated to BRICs in 2001. In the year 2010, South Africa was added to the group making BRIC, the BRICS. Their economies grew at an average of 6% annually between 2000 and 2010, much faster than the growth of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) economies, which grew by an average of 2% annually during the same time period. (Global village). At present the BRICS...

Words: 1526 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...Long-Term Outlook for the BRICs and N-11 Post Crisis The BRIC and N-11 countries are emerging from the crisis better than the developed world. As a result, our long-term projections for the BRICs look more, rather than less, likely to be realised. It is now possible that China will become as big as the US by 2027, and the BRICs as big as the G7 by 2032. Within the BRICs and N-11, China, Brazil, India, Indonesia and the Philippines appear to be performing best. Bangladesh, Egypt, Korea, Nigeria, Turkey and Vietnam form a second group of countries that have performed broadly in line with expectations. Iran, Mexico, Pakistan and Russia have need for improvement. We show the ongoing dramatic BRIC influence in key product markets, with autos and crude oil as examples. Important disclosures appear at the back of this document Thanks to Dominic Wilson, Michael Buchanan, Paulo Leme and Swarnali Ahmed for their valuable comments, and to Alex Kelston for the Growth Environment Scores Jim O’Neill and Anna Stupnytska December 4, 2009 Goldman Sachs Global Economics, Commodities and Strategy Research Global Economics Paper Contents Summary Section 1. Where We Stand on the BRICs and N-11 Section 2. The BRICs and N-11 in the Aftermath of the Crisis 2.1 BRICs and N-11 Global Importance Continues to Rise 3 4 6 6 Higher growth contribution Increasing trade shares Rebalancing current accounts Domestic demand and economic resilience 2.2 BRICs Market Performance in Context ...

Words: 13484 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Comparative Attractiveness of China and India

...wrote an economic research paper “Building Better Global Economic, BRICs”, in this report, O’Neill listed four countries with their initial letters combined being BRIC – Brazil, Russia, India and China – as the world’s fastest developed economies that can be considered as the most promising emerging markets in the world. Latter the BRICs become BRICS with South Africa joining the group, together the five BRICS countries had represented approximately 3 billion people and a combined nominal GDP being US$ 14.8 trillion and US$ 4 trillion in combined foreign reserves (IMF 2013). However, within the five BRICS countries, China and India very similar and the only two Asian countries, they had many things in common – large size of country lands and large size of population as well, the relatively large gap between wealthy and poor households, together with the similar economic routes – both countries had their economies boosted in the 1970s and 1980s benefiting from the large sum of foreign direct investments (Halpin, 2012). Based on the above basic conditions, the consulting team hired by Australian Trade Commission (Austrade) would conduct a comparative analysis for the country attractiveness of China and India, standing in the position for the businesses in Australia who wished to expand their businesses to one or both of the countries, thereby to providing suggestions for these businesses. As for details, the report would compare the legal, social and economic conditions of the two...

Words: 2354 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Driving Through Bric Markets

...Driving Through BRIC Markets Lessons for Indian Car Manufacturers December 2011\in ons for Indian Car Manufacturers Contents Executive Summary Introduction Overview Brazil Russia India China Conclusion Appendix Sources Contacts 4 6 7 10 15 19 24 29 31 33 34 Executive Summary The BRIC block has emerged as the economic power house of growth for the automotive industry through the last decade. What started as an exploration of new/extra markets for car sales in the early 90s has gone on to become the mainstream market of the new millennium. Supported by attractive macro-economic factors such as growing economic activity, urbanization, rising household incomes, developing credit markets and very low car density, the BRIC countries currently make up for the top 7 automotive markets globally. The BRIC block has been strongly growing for over 10 years; with 3 of 4 BRIC economies surging ahead even during the 2008 economic crisis. So that prompts us to ask how the dynamics have transformed over the years. What were the major drivers of growth in car sales in the last decade and into the future? Is the current slowdown a blip or is it here to stay? More importantly, what does the growth dynamics in China, Brazil and Russia mean to the Indian automotive market? We offer our perspective on the impact of macroeconomic factors on car sales in the BRIC block between 2001 and 2011. Below are the key findings of our analysis: 1. Car sales in Brazil, Russia, India...

Words: 2118 - Pages: 9

Free Essay


...1) Brazil is home to the second largest male shaving preparations market, led by shaving gels/lotion category.  Russia leads the male shaving preparations market in terms of value among the BRIC nations.  China is set to be the most lucrative investment destination for the male shaving preparations market in future.,...-a0243892871 2) BRICs, Emerging Market Consumer Insights 3) Gillette Group OOO was the clear leader of men’s grooming with a 43% value share in 2012. The company held an even stronger position in men’s shaving, the largest men’s grooming subcategory, where it took a 57% value share in 2012. Gillette Group is the company that is considered to have created the standards of modern shaving for men. It has invested heavily in the creation of innovative, more efficient products and large-scale promotional campaigns. The second largest player in men’s grooming was Beiersdorf OOO with a 9% value share in 2012, while all other companies did not manage to exceed 6% value share. 4) HOW TO WIN THE RUSSIAN SHOPPER * Russians love new products and innovations. * More than ¾ of Russian Consumers (76%) are interested in trying new products. * 38% of Russian consumers frequently notice products on store shelves...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3