Free Essay

Brics Countries

In: Business and Management

Submitted By egm108
Words 3555
Pages 15

Definition of BRICS 2 A Brief History 2 BRICS Goals 3

First Declaration – Information Technology 3

Second Declaration – Industry Cooperation 4

Third Declaration – Agriculture 3

Reasons for Emergence of BRICS 5

Review of Economic Performance 6

Other Current Issues 7

References 9

Appendix 10 (BRICS Economic Data Table)


A Brief History

In 2001, Jim O’Neil – an economist at Goldman Sachs – first coined the term BRIC and ever since then it stood as an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India and China. At the time, O’Neil was trying to predict where Wall Street investors could place their investment dollars. In their search for future high growth and therefore high profits within a span of one to two decades, O’Neil came up with recommending the BRIC countries as potentially good nations where to park investment dollars. In that same year, he went on to predict that over the first decade of the twenty first century, the economies of those BRIC countries would increase in a very significant way; so much so, that it would “outpace growth of some of the world’s largest economies” (Sharma, 2012). In 2015 his prediction is presently valid, but mostly for China, which has achieved impressive economic growth in the last few years, and for India, which despite its ambivalent economic performance and socialistic labor tendencies, it has managed to post some notable levels of economic growth.

At the beginning of the twenty first century, in search for new national markets where investment dollars could gain hefty returns, and partially as a result of sluggish economic performance in the US and Europe, Wall Street placed its sight on emerging economies such as China, Brazil and even Russia. O’Neil was not the only Wall Street economist or investor to actively seek other lands where money could be invested. There were others. However, it was he who brought the notion of BRIC to the forefront of American financial media.

During the first few years of the 2000s, the respective foreign ministers of these BRIC countries met informally and at irregular times. In the second half of the decade, they sought ways in which their countries could cooperate politically. This was no surprise since India has always aligned with Russia, even during the Cold War, as Pakistan aligned with America during those rather dangerous times. Brazil, a Latin American country, had lately also leaned toward leftist governments; therefore it was not surprising that Brazil was seeking political cooperation with China and Russia, a communist and a socialist country, respectively.

In 2009, in their first official meeting, and as an initiative of Russia, BRIC countries were formalized as a bloc of countries ready to start operations.

In 2010, South Africa, the “S” in BRICS – as an initiative from Chinese President Hu Jintao –became formally accepted by the four original countries in December of that year, right at the end of the decade. The country had sought membership in BRIC, and was finally granted membership, after several campaigns for inclusion.

Ever since, BRICS have had yearly summits. By now, they have had seven in total. In 2016, they are planning to meet for their eighth annual summit in New Delhi, India.


BRIC countries do have ambitious goals. Their official website pinpoints the most important ones at this stage of their development.

The original talks in 2001 started by seeking ways to cooperate in the political arena. Today, in 2015, they seek cooperation in several spheres: economic, security and information technology.

How BRICS countries are seeking mutual cooperation and benefit can be ascertained from three major “declarations” they have officially drafted and posted in their website:

Declaration of the Participants in the Forum of the Brics Countries’ Leading Media Outlets “Towards Creating a Common Information Space for the BRICS Countries.”

Declaration of the Brics Industry Ministers Industrial Cooperation of the BRICS Countries: New Opportunities for Growth.

Joint Declaration of the 5th Meeting of the BRICS Ministers Of Agriculture and Agrarian Development

Declaration of the Participants in the Forum of the Brics Countries’ Leading Media Outlets “Towards Creating a Common Information Space for the BRICS Countries.”

This declaration intends to exchange opinions on the following topics: integration trends in the global information space, exploring media development models, and creating a common, sustainable, and productive information space for BRICS countries.

According to Russian leadership, the intention of this declaration is to eventually create a healthy discussion based on “plurality of opinions, journalistic ethics, openness,” (BRICS, 2015) and a mutual desire to explore and learn from each other’s cultures.

One of the specific goals of this declaration is to create a platform for exchanging information and content in which a partnership, among these five countries, can be built toward the creation and exchange of products and services.

Another interesting goal is that they want to strongly stimulate the role of the media with the intention of increasing and strengthening cooperation, seeking an outcome of friendship and mutual understanding of each country platforms. They seek to promote a political dialogue, trade and economic ties, and the exchange of cultural and humanitarian help.

In my opinion, this is a bold and somewhat dubious attempt to practice something that they cannot individually practice themselves. Journalistic ethics and plurality of opinion would entail freedom of the press. Interestingly, China and Russia are notorious for checking, restricting, and, often times, denying this basic freedom to their citizens.

Declaration of the Brics Industry Ministers Industrial Cooperation of the BRICS Countries: New Opportunities for Growth.

On account of the global economic situation produced by the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, and the volatility that it brought to global financial markets, this declaration purports to offer a better solution, or better vehicles of financial stability for BRICS countries. With this declaration, they intend to achieve by 2030, their objective of sustainable development. This includes attaining a modernized, resilient infrastructure; promoting inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and fostering innovation in the economic and technology spheres.

With this declaration, BRICS countries also intend to strengthen their industrial sectors seeking accelerated economic growth, and ways of creating jobs. This will bring them to creating a platform of favorable investment climate, which they can accomplish by promoting, attracting, and protecting mutual investments in joint projects in all of their industries.

The specific policies in achieving this bold goals are, among others, the sharing of new technologies in the fields of mining, pharmaceuticals, mechanical manufacturing, aircraft construction, railway equipment and green technologies.

It is difficult to see how this could be achieved, given the fact that China, India, and Russia have very poor track records in the field of the protection intellectual property rights. Currently, they are all making some progress; however, in order to achieve what they intend to, they would have to make a major improvement in such protection. The West has been very successful at innovation, within the fields of technological and industrial development, to a greater extent due to their substantial, strong, and conducive legal system. Within the philosophy of law, the theory of the rule of law, along with the development and protection of property rights, have played a major role in fomenting and sustaining the innovative spirit of entrepreneurs.

BRICS countries, which lack the appropriate institutions – such as systems of courts, a body of law, and trained professionals in the field – would have a very difficult time trying to achieve this goal. In order for them to accomplish this, they would have to fundamentally reform their political and legal system, and make it more conducive to the establishment of the institution of private property, the protection thereof, and the propagation of the rule of law within the bloc.

Surprisingly, they have agreed to use some of the UN’s own programs, such as the UN industrial development organization. They even have agreed, a least in principle, to facilitate the expansion of a cooperation with the UN. However, any meaningful results are yet to be seen.

Joint Declaration of the 5th Meeting of the BRICS Ministers Of Agriculture and Agrarian Development

Under this declaration, BRICS countries also have set a major goal, which mainly pivots around the issue of food supply security. They plan to enhance their agricultural trade agreements and investment, their conjoined agricultural research and development, their technologies and innovations related to agriculture, and the protection of the right to adequate food supplies. Particularly, they intend to do this, by strengthening family farming, and by the creation of a basic agricultural and informational exchange system of new technologies. They also intend to protect the environment, at the same time that they create technologies that might pollute it. In this declaration, BRICS countries also have express their willingness to work with the UN’s sustainable development Summit’s guidelines, held in September of 2015.

According to the Russian perspective, BRICS countries would rely substantially on the governments to conduct their research and development efforts. In contrast with the West, this seems to be counterproductive, for the successful R&D efforts that we find in the West are the byproducts of highly motivated individuals and firms in their pursuit of profits. The Western countries, especially the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, and France, are at the forefront of R&D breakthroughs. Their successful R&D programs have produced the abundance of products and services that the Western economies now enjoy. If Western governments were involved in these R&D efforts, it was at a very minimal level. Most of it is the product of private companies and individuals. The fact that BRICS countries are trying to accomplish the same thing through a government concerted effort is something new, which based on past experience, has a very little chance to succeed. Just think of what happened to Russia. In the technological front, Russia is pretty much always behind the West. This lagging could be explained by the fact that Russia’ R&D is controlled by the state; and not by individual firms. Similarly, in China whose R&D has been to a greater extent, on the spying on Western countries and on corporate espionage to basically steal technological innovations. This trend is changing of late. China is not only setting the stage to protect intellectual property rights, but also to invest in their own R&D efforts.

It seems that BRICS countries have a specific target of protecting food supplies, because in the past, they had been very poorly managed. It seems that these countries do not lack resources for feeding their citizens; rather, they lack the managerial know-how, the technological know-how that the West had been developing and enjoying for decades, especially since the latter half of the 20th century.

This lack of managerial know-how, and technological development, has been the direct byproduct of entrepreneurial ingenuity that can hardly be found elsewhere besides the West. If the BRICS countries intend to come to the same level as the West, they would have to reform their economic institutions even further, let alone their political institutions, to facilitate this kind of ingenuity.


Russia and China have been, for several decades now, trying to achieve significant progress in their efforts to compete with Western nations in the fields of science, technology, and economics. To some extent, they are not comfortable with the leadership that the United States, and other Western nations have in those fields. Through the medium of BRICS, these two nations are trying to accomplish the same thing that they could not accomplish on their own, individually. With the cooperation of India, South Africa, and Brazil, they are attempting to challenge Western leadership.

Perhaps the most palpable event that triggered some level of confidence, and provided the necessary impetus for China and Russia to form BRICS, was the 2008-2009 financial crisis created in the United States. Many political leaders, of many nations, saw (as still do) the cause of that crisis as the lack of moral and economic failures of the USA. To a certain degree, the lack of foresight, leadership, and the emphasis on short-term profits – peculiar of United States capitalists – the world’s nations lost their high regard that they once had for the United States’ financial leadership. Leveraging on this type of lack of confidence from the world’s nations, BRICS countries decided to band themselves as a block of countries ready to challenge the West, starting with the economic front, with plans to add the scientific and technological front soon later.

This is very evident in the fact that BRICS countries are creating a direct competitor to the IMF and World Bank – the BRICS Development Bank. This Dew development Bank will be funded with $100 billion in capital, all coming from the five BRICS countries. The purpose of this New Development Bank is mainly to help BRICS countries in balancing their account on the balance of payments. In their minds, political leaders of BRICS countries think that this banking institution is the result of the lack of transparency and reform that is long overdue at the IMF, under the leadership of the USA. China and Russia have been, for some time now, seeking reforms at the IMF. Because those reforms have not been forthcoming, nor IMF leadership has expressed an interest on the issue, BRICS countries have gone ahead with the creation of their own world banking institution.

The New Development Bank also aims at helping other poor and developing nations. By doing so, they are in direct competition with the World Bank and the IMF.

Within their future sight, BRICS countries also aim at inviting other developing nations into their foil. Although at this time there is nothing formalized, in the past, they have expressed some interests in inviting Argentina, Mexico, Indonesia, among others. Argentina, Indonesia and Turkey have also expressed strong interest in joining BRICS. Egypt, Iran, Nigeria, Sudan, Syria as well as Bangladesh and Greece have recently had shown some interest in joining also. This interest of several nations to join BRICS should be of some interest to the United States, if it doesn’t want to lose its leadership in the world. Perhaps, the U.S. should be more inclusive in their handling of the IMF and World Bank. They should pay attention to the grievances that BRICS countries have particular towards the IMF.

It seems then that BRICS countries are creating more than just a regular trade agreements. With the banding together, and the possible future inclusion of other developing nations, BRICS is aiming at nothing less than becoming of formidable, capable competitor to the United States leadership in the world.


Russia presently holds the presidency of BRICS countries, and it claims that the bloc contains 42% of the world’s population (3.06 billion); 26% of the planet’s land; and 27% of the world’s GDP ($39.9 trillion).

When looked at it with more scrutiny, BRICS’ economic performance is not that great. Despite their size (population) and its geographic reach, BRICS can only muster an average of $7,991 GDP per capita in 2014. This may be an indication of their rather poor technological level in economic efficiency and their relatively low human resources development.

Their GDP growth rate is driven by China at 7.3% and India at 7.4%; the other three countries are way behind this level of growth. These three countries bring their average economic growth down to 3.34% when combined.

Their average unemployment rate is 10.17% with South Africa having a whopping 25%, the highest of them all, while China’s rate is barely 4.04%. The total unemployed is 212.5 million workers, and those living below the poverty line (BPL) amount to 548.2 million. One problem, within the realm of politics, is that if a war is ever started against the West, a sizeable portion of these many millions of unemployed individuals could be drafted.

The source of their GDP is composed of an average of 31.08% of manufacturing output and 61.06% in services. This indicates their developing economies have a good mix of economic activity; indeed en route to probably becoming fully developed economies, if we measure it by an increasing portion of GDP being generated from the “service” sector.

In the realm of current account balances of trade, except for China with a healthy $219.7 billion and Russia with $57.41 billion, all other countries have negative balances. Their total combined balance of trade is $137.29 billion. In terms of current dollars, they had a total exports of $3.52 billion and a total of imports of $3.024 billion, leaving them with a net exports of $0.499 billion. This is reflected in their share of GDP’s exports at 25.80% and imports at 25.32%

Inflation is also placing restrictions on stability of their economic growth. With Russia’s inflation rate at 7.8% being the highest and China’s 2% being the lowest, BRICS countries have an average of 5.75% when combined.

Economic and technological innovations are major factors that drive economic development and sustaining the growth of developed economies. BRICS countries have a combined average of 0.60, as measured by the Global Innovation Index. This index tracks innovations in 141 countries.

Governments play an important role in economics. Even the most capitalistic country in the world, the USA, has some form of government intervention in the economy by way of many legislative decrees from various agencies. The political stability of nations have a major impact on their economic stability. And this is reflected on how stable and effective governments are, in general. When measured the stability and effectiveness of 141 countries, the Global Innovation Index ranks BRICS countries with a combined index of 0.49. With Finland (1.00) being the most stable country, in 2014, and Sudan being the least at 0.00, BRICS sits slightly below from the middle of the pack. This may be an indication that BRICS may not have the political environment necessary to take their economies to the next level of development.



Many view the Chinese communist party’s edicts of the “one-child” policy of the 1980 as the worst kind of intrusion on its people by a government. On October 30th, 2015, China’s political leaders announced that they will allow up to two children per family. Their fear is that the aging population is increasing out of hand, and the country will end up having to take care of a disproportionate number of old-aged Chinese by their dwindling younger population. The changing in policy is not bad; it is needed because their population is growing older, without a reasonable growth in the young population entering the workforce.

This means that China’s aging population is increasing much faster than its economic growth; the country is not getting rich fast enough for it. In order to tackle this problem, China will have to find a much faster way of growing its economy than it is presently doing at 7%, or thereabouts.

The problems is compounded because the race for faster economic growth has to be sufficient to absorb the cost of financing its older population with increasingly less working people, as well with a semi developed – and according to some, much less developed – system of retirement finance. This is another pitfall that China is facing in its imitation of the market economies of the West, wherein a fairly well developed system of retirement planning does exist.

Within the next few decades this population issue may hamper what China can contribute to the further development of BRICS.


One interesting fact about Russia – according to Nicholas Eberstadt, the Henry Wendt Scholar in political economy – is that Russia’s export revenue as an exporter of oil, gas and other energy related products, does not even come close to the level of Belgium. He claims that Russia has not attained any meaningful revenues higher than Belgium, nor even in a single year. This issue alone leaves a lingering doubt as to the real status of Russian economic power.

Since one of Russia’s main sources of revenue is their exports of gas, mainly to Western Europe, and their income level has not even matched that of Belgium, this can very will indicate that their contributions to the future of BRICS may not be as great as once thought.


India has a lot of socialistic policies specifically related to labor and land. These policies hampered its competitive advantage in the manufacturing sector. The fact that India has not risen as a manufacturing hub or power of the world – after China’s labor cost has been rising – is an indication that India’s political leaders are so mired into their outdated policies that they are not seeing the opportunity being missed. Except in the realm of software technology, India may not be a great contributor to BRICS.



BRICS Website:

SHARMA, Ruchir, 2012, Broke BRICs, Why the Rest Stopped Rising. Published by the Council on Foreign Relations. Foreign Affairs Magazine. Global Innovation Index International Monetary Fund The World Bank

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Bric Countries Research

...The BRICK countries have been attracting huge foreign direct investments in the recent past due to the peculiar nature of their economies. They are seen as emerging markets with huge economical growth and development that is experienced in any other economies. The major characteristics of the countries are the enormous consumer market comprising of large middle-income citizens and huge natural resources endowment. They also have sound financial institutions, excellent, efficient and modern communication, and transport and energy sectors. In addition, the economies have sound legal systems (Narayanamurthy Vijayakumar, 2010). According to (Khan, 2011) FDI is not only the financial component but covers other areas such as technology management, capital and market access. in their research (Philip, 2010) they found out that 1 percent of FDI in these countries resulted to about 0.07 percent increment in the countries’ GDP. The main impact of the FDI to the BRICK economies is as discussed below The investments received form foreign investors facilitate the country to venture into the global market. This is especially because the multinationals investing within these BRICK countries is able to produce goods in large scales for the global markets. This therefore enhances the countries to take advantage of globalization. Having firms that can produce for the international markets makes the country have favorable balance of trade, which makes the country favorable...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bric Countries Importance in Int'L Business

...The BRICs markets are both the fastest growing and largest emerging market economies. The countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China are becoming ever larger forces in the world economy. They account for almost three billion people, or just under half of the total population of the world. In recent times, they have also contributed to the majority of the world GDP growth. For some time their growth rates have been faster than those experienced in the western economies, and they have been able to withstand the recent economic crisis with greater resilience (Geoff, 2010). According to various economists’ projections, it is only a matter of time before China becomes the biggest economy in the world. China is expanding its reach all over the world. For instance, they are making in-road into most African countries which use to be a reserve place for the west, thereby stopping the monopoly that the western economies had in this part of the world. Most African nations with their leaders prefer to do business with China because of their poor ethical standard and the wiliness to do anything just to win the hearts of these leaders who are less concerned about the well-being of their people. In fact, Goldman Sachs believes that by 2050 these BRICs countries will be the most important economies in the world thereby relegating the US to fifth place (EconomyWatch, 2010). By 2020, economists’ project that all of the BRIC countries should be in the top 10 largest economies of the world. Manufacturers...

Words: 1409 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Brics Countries

..... 3 2 MILITARY EXPENDITURES – BRIC COUNTRIES 2.1 BRASIL .......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 RUSSIA ......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 INDIA ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 CHINA ........................................................................................................... 7 3 MILITARY EXPENDITURE - NATO ............................................................. 8 4 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 10 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND STRUCTURE The acronym BRIC summerize countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. The BRIC countries are promising due to its huge population and the long-lasting economic growth, that’s why expectations of the market development are high. The inventor of the BRIC concept, Jim O'Neill, chief economist at the investment bank Goldman Sachs, published the study,, Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050 " in 2003. His sensational report predicted:,, Over the next 50 years, Brazil, Russia, India and China ,the BRIC economies, could become a much larger force in the world economy”. O'Neill forecasts that already in 2040 the BRIC countries could achieve together a stronger economic...

Words: 2642 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Brics Countries

..... 3 2 MILITARY EXPENDITURES – BRIC COUNTRIES 2.1 BRASIL .......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 RUSSIA ......................................................................................................... 5 2.3 INDIA ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4 CHINA ........................................................................................................... 7 3 MILITARY EXPENDITURE - NATO ............................................................. 8 4 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................9 BIBLIOGRAPHY 10 3 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND STRUCTURE The acronym BRIC summerize countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. The BRIC countries are promising due to its huge population and the long-lasting economic growth, that’s why expectations of the market development are high. The inventor of the BRIC concept, Jim O'Neill, chief economist at the investment bank Goldman Sachs, published the study,, Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050 " in 2003. His sensational report predicted:,, Over the next 50 years, Brazil, Russia, India and China ,the BRIC economies, could become a much larger force in the world economy”. O'Neill forecasts that already in 2040 the BRIC countries could achieve together a stronger economic...

Words: 2642 - Pages: 11

Free Essay


...BRIC is an acronym standing for Brazil, Russia, India and China. Although can be categorized by importance of countries, it would be CIRB which is China, India, Russia and Brazil. The BRIC are both the fastest growing and largest emerging markets economies. These four countries encompass more than quarter of the world’s land area and in 2009 accounted for more than 40% of world’s population, 40% of the world’s foreign exchange reserves and 25% of world’s GDP. The states, which were earlier, accepted to consider as developing countries of Third world, promptly become economic giants of the new world. BRIC: Brazil, Russia, India and China – four markets everyone with the unique features, but thus unites them the potential generated by changes in political systems of these countries. As a result of these changes there was a consumer demand, which is formed by 43% of the population of the whole world. In roughly developing countries of BRIC there are five of the ten largest cities of planet where concentrated the huge amount of capital and millions of consumers who are aspiring up on social and economic ladder. The term BRIC was included into a business lexicon in 2003 after the economist of Goldman Sachs investment bank Jim O'Neill described future economic picture of the world. In his opinion, by 2050 the economic capacity of these four countries will allow them to become dominating economies, and to surpass in scales not only economy of the USA, but also economy of all of the...

Words: 2479 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Brics

...The BRICs have developed exceptional growth in the last decade, rivaling the advance economies. The BRICs, coined by Goldman Sachs, consists of four countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. These four countries are the fastest-growing markets in the world. The intensification of globalization has allowed these four markets to flourish. Even with the latest economic crisis, the BRICs are predicted to recover faster than the advance economies. By 2050, all the BRICs are forecast to past most advance economies. But, there are implications that hinder the BRICs full potential economic growth. There are distinctive factors for each of the BRICs that have helped gain influential economic power over the decades. The most influential and fastest growing market is China. China has been an isolated country both politically and economically in the world. It was not until the 1970s and 80s when China brought about economic reform. The main focus of these reforms was to change the economy away from the agriculture sector to international trade. These reforms allowed for China’s economy to flourish by opening its economy to the world for the purposes of trade and direct foreign investment. Since the liberalization of the economy, China has become the fourth largest economy with a growth rate of 9.5% over 26 years (Forbes). Its gross domestic product in 2009 was about $4.7 trillion (CIA). The second largest economic emerging country is India. India’s economy is controlled and...

Words: 1267 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assignment on Bric

...Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” Case Study | ITB 301Section: 3Spring 2012Submitted to:Salma AkterLecturerDepartment of Business Administration.East West University, Dhaka.Submitted byArafat Rauf2009-2-10-345Date of Submission: 28th March 2012 | Letter of Transmittal March 28, 2012 Salma Akter, Senior lecturer East West University Subject: Submission of Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” case study Dear Madam, I have prepared an Assignment on “Meet the BRIC” case study. It was an energizing experience throughout the semester and preparing this assignment further enhanced my insight about International Business. I hope that this report fulfils your requirements and your feedback is very much necessary to overcome my faults and lacking. This will help me in my entire life. It is my pleasure to carry out this assignment under your supervision. I would like to request you to accept my report for further assessment and I will be available to answer any question for clarification. Thank you for your sincere support. Yours sincerely, Arafat Rauf 2009-2-10-345 Table of contents Title | Page number | - BRIC | 4 | Economic growth of BRIC | 7 | Question 1: Map the proposed sequence of the evolution of the economy of the BRIC’s. What indicators might companies monitor to guide their investments and organize their local market operations? | 8 | Question 2: What are the implications of the emergence of the BRICs for careers and companies in your country? | 8 | Question...

Words: 2774 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Meet the Bricks

... BRIC 2 Economic growth of BRIC 4 Question 1: Map the proposed sequence of the evolution of the economy of the BRICs. What indicators might companies monitor to guide their investments and organize their local market operations? 5 Question 2: What are the implications of the emergence of the BRICs for careers and companies in your country? 5 Question 3: Do you think recency bias has led to overestimating the potential of the BRICs? How would you, as a manager for a company assessing these markets, try to control this bias? 6 Question 4: How might managers interpret the potential for their product in a market that is, in absolute economic terms, large but, on a per capita basis, characterized by a majority of poor to very poor consumers? 6 Question 5: In the event that the BRICs fail to meet projected performance, what would be some of the implications for international business? 6 Question 6: Compare and contrast the merits of GNI per capita versus the idea of purchasing power parity, human development, and green economics as indicators of economic potential in Brazil, Russia, China, and India. 7 Conclusion 8 Reference 9 “BRIC” BRIC is a grouping acronym that refers to the countries of Brazil. Russia. India and China, which are all deemed to be at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development. It is typically rendered as "the BRICs" or "the BRIC countries" or "the BRIC economies" or alternatively as the "Big Four" BRICS is an...

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Brics: the Vanguard of the Revolution

...Case Study The BRICs: Vanguard of The Revolution The BRICs, composed of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, are the future of the world’s most powerful economies and the current most accelerated emerging economies. Together they are home to nearly 2.8 billion people, about 40 percent of the planet’s population. They currently generate about 30 percent of world’s GDP. They have come a long way from the last 30 years or so, each one overcoming their own barriers and obstacles to achieve where they are today. They are all expecting to increase their income within the next 15-30 years exponentially, allowing for the economy to flourish and incorporate new markets that were otherwise less popular or almost non-existent. For example, cars in India and China were about 2 and 9 out of 100 people, respectively. They estimate that the total number of cars in both countries could rise from 150 million today to north of a billion by 2030. Not everything is positive however, there are skeptics who say there are problems such as the delusion that current trends will continue indefinitely and uninterrupted. That economic growth rates slow as the base of activity expands and advantages such as cheap labor or low-cost capital wane as growing demand increases marginal price pressures. That there’s always a black swan event, an unexpected, hard-to-predict impact that resets the game such as the internet, the collapse of the Soviet Union or the global financial crisis. Despite ever-present...

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Free Essay


...Institute of Professional Education and Research, Bhopal Business Environment Report on BRIC 2050 India performance and status Submitted To: Submitted By: Prof. (Dr.) Resham Chopra Bharat Naryani Priyank Ajmera BRIC BRIC are the acronym used to refer to the combination of the four biggest emerging-market countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. According to Wikipedia BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) is a coalition of regional and superpowers reportedly proposed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Predictions & Projections: Economists argued that, given sound political decision-making and good luck, the BRIC economies together could become larger than those of the world’s six most developed countries in less than 40 years. i.e BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China together would be larger than G6 (G7 excluding Canada) in USD in less than 40 years. Of the current G6, only the US and Japan may be among the six largest economies in US dollar terms in 2050. It is projected that  the Brics to account for close to 40 per cent of global GDP by 2050 and to have become four of the world’s top five economies. It is projected that the Brics’ rise in absolute terms will push them up to the top of the global leaderboard, in per capita GDP their performance will not be quite so impressive. Reasons why India will rise: 1) Manufacturing productivity will drive growth. It’s performance will improve due to globalisation and increased competition...

Words: 1522 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Global Business Operation

...GLOBAL BUSINSESS OPERATION ADEGBENRO ELEWADE MIB 34- 130226 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT QUESTION- You have been employed as a business consultant to advise a company manufacturing smart phones who wishes to explore the potential of doing business in one Latin American emerging market. You must produce a report that identifies the key issues that the company will face in your chosen market and secondly offer expert advice to attain business success in that market. CONTENTS- 1. Introduction. 2. View of Brazil’s economy. 3. Brazil as a BRICS Economy. 4. Market for smart phones in Brazil. 5. Using the porter’s five forces to analyse the market for smart phones in Brazil. 6. Competitors existing in the market. 7. How to enter the market. 8. Constraints to success for the company (using PESTLE model). 9. How to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. 1. INTRODUCTION The Cost (this involves the legal cost, corruption, lack of infrastructure), Benefits (size of the economy or economy growth),Risk (political-social unrest, economic mis-management) analysis has been used to analyse the favourable emerging market in Latin America which is Brazil. The main reasons for choosing this market will discussed in details. 2. OVERVIEW OF BRAZIL’S ECONOMY The chosen market is BRAZIL which is an emerging market and also the largest of the Latin American nations and the second largest in the western hemisphere with...

Words: 2630 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

China Economic Article from Goldman Sachs

...In the eyes of Jim O'Neil, managing director and head of Goldman Sachs Global Economic Research, the global crisis has only been a blessing for China, accelerating the global power shift from the West to the East. O'Neil, based in London, coined the acronym BRIC to refer to the fast growing developing economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China. "I think China has had a really good crisis in some ways. It has been good for them, as it forced them to stop being so dependent on exports. I think our 2050 'dream' scenario for BRIC has become more likely, rather than less, since the crisis. The trend growth in Brazil and India seems to be rising also," O'Neil told The Korea Times. According to a Goldman Sachs report, China will dominate the global economy in 2050 with a GDP of $70 trillion, followed by the U.S., India, Brazil and Russia. "I think the likelihood of China challenging the number one spot of the U.S. has actually risen, as now China's growth is going to be determined by domestic forces and the rise of consumption, so it is more sustainable," he said. "On our latest long-term estimates, we think that China might overtake the U.S. by 2027 (in terms of GDP), and with it, the combined GDP of the BRIC countries will become bigger than that of the G7," he added. The veteran economist forecast that the U.S. financial market and dollar will start losing their dominant positions in the global financial market a decade from now. "I think the U.S. financial markets...

Words: 526 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Shiseido in Russia

...As the world’s economy continues to rebound from recession, many companies and brands are focusing on the growth of emerging markets—particularly BRIC markets. However, as discussed in Carrie Lennard’s article “BRIC Key for Future Growth” in the June 2010 issue of GCI magazine, Russia—the “R” in BRIC—felt the economic downturn quite strongly (“Growth in premium beauty products slid down from 20% during 2006–2007 to 0% 2008–2009.”) and is still not seeing some of the other gains of similar markets. However, as discussed below, some beauty brands are still targeting the country as a key for growth in the coming years. To note, Shiseido announced plans to introduce its corporate culture and promote sales at a Shiseido Exhibition/1872–2011/Empire of Beauty event in Russia. To be held from March 1 to March 20, 2011, the event will take place in the arcade of GUM, the landmark in front of Red Square that is one of Moscow’s largest department stores and an attraction for tourists worldwide, as well as Russian consumers. The event space is nearly 90 meters long, and the showcase will allow visitors to witness Shiseido’s history and aesthetic sensibility through exhibits of an array of products, posters and other items introducing Shiseido’s corporate culture. Moreover, a sales promotion corner will offer trials of skin care products from the global brand Shiseido premium cosmetics lineup. This initiative advances Shiseido’s aims to further enhance its presence while continuing to...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Case Study

...Case Study #2 – Black Angus Steakhouse 1. What variables need to be considered in developing a list of potential countries ? There are multiple variables to consider when a company wants to expand its operations outside the United States : market potential, customer characteristics, business cycles, competition (is there any competitors already in this market), local culture (make some research about the culture, to fit the needs of people), economic and political outlook (what is the situation of the country at that moment), government policies, financial requirements, labor markets, taxation, legal environment (what are the laws in that specific country), crime and corruption (if this is a safe place to work), infrastructure, foreign trade environment and current and future costs of building a business and brand (is it profitable to expand there). 2. From the list of top “candidates” what data should you collect on each market? The marketing department should collect data for each market about overall population and target buyer population, spending power per capita, category penetration rates, overall growth of categories, share of each brands, media costs, previous marketing expenditures, category profitability, competitor metrics. Thanks to this data, Black Angus Steakhouse can build predictive models in order to know which market will be the most profitable and what will be their future position in each market. 3. What market entry strategy would...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

International Business and actions? BRIC companies are on the verge rapid growth of their consumer markets. History shows when consumer demand takes off when GNI per capita reaches levels between $3,000 and $10,000 per year.) In Russia there is already significant evidence of the growth of consumerism during the past decade. There are also early signs of similar trends in China and India, but they have yet to cross the threshold. However the BRICS stated that Russia middle class is showing rapid growth. It is expected that within a decade or so, each of the BRICs will show higher returns, increased demand for capital, and stronger national currencies. Thus, foreign firms will want to monitor major economic indicators such as GNI, PPP, and the Human Development Index, as well as developments in the cultural, political, and legal environments of those nations. The indicator that companies might monitor to guide their investments and actions is the futures of widespread poverty and distorted income distributions. What are the implications of the emergence of the BRICs for careers and companies in your country? The emergence of the BRICs effect on our country has some advantages and disadvantages, because it may create new career opportunities, more product options, and better price and/or quality for products because of competition. But on the other hand it may affect negatively the domestic firms more over it may cause some kind of monopoly as the BRICs taking the lead. Do you...

Words: 756 - Pages: 4