Free Essay

Euthanasia: Freedom to Die with Dignity

In:

Submitted By rammpt88
Words 1093
Pages 5
Euthanasia: Freedom to Die with Dignity
Charletta R. Anderson
Strayer University
ENG 215
Dr. Aaron Miller
December 12, 2011

Euthanasia: Freedom to Die with Dignity
The word “Euthanasia” comes from a Greek phrase meaning “good death”. However, in today’s society it means killing a terminally ill person as a way to end that person’s pain and suffering (Cundiff, 1992 ). In the year 2007, my grandfather the Honorable Leon Davis was dying. This American war hero had made a request to die with dignity. He was dealing with a failed kidney, pneumonia, dementia, hypertension, MRSA foot infection, a broken hip, and terrible living conditions at a nursing home. All these problems left him weak and physically dependent on others. For terminally ill patients like my grandfather, where death was inevitable and would have been less painful than living, euthanasia should be a consideration or an option. Euthanasia is a way of relieving terminally or severely ill people's pain and save them from the agony of their illness. People claim that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that promise such rights as marriage, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment. This essay will discuss why or why not ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and merciful death by the means of Euthanasia.
Legalizing Euthanasia

In the 1970s , a movement that had tried to legalize some form of euthanasia, and it has been referred to as the “Right to Die” Movement (Yount, 2000, p. 12 ). They believe that competent adults with less those six months to live should be legally permitted not only to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment, but also to receive a physician’s help in ending their lives if they request it. They also believe that people with incurable degenerative or disabling conditions should also be allowed to ask for aid in dying, even if their illness is not terminal (Yount, 2000, p. 3 ). My grandfather like other severely ill people declared that he wanted to die because his pain was so severe. He often made the statement, “Whose life is it, anyway? Let me have the freedom to die with dignity” Euthanasia practices are considered another way of saying, "Right to Die”. Several associations lobbied for the right to end one's life in a dignified manner. I have been in this circumstance three times with family members who were in so much pain from deteriorating medical issues. For this reason, a person should have the right to take his or her own life, when they had incurable illnesses and in severe pain. My aunt and I had the legal responsibility of making the decision or respecting my grandfather’s desires in his last days, to die with dignity. My grandfather stated repeatedly, that he no longer wanted to live, because the pain was unbearable. Who knows one’s pain better than the person who is enduring it? However, if the person in pain makes the decision not to live anymore, refuses any medical treatment and requests a higher dosage of painkillers, then he or she has stated their option.

Emmanuel (1999) argues that legalizing Euthanasia is the solution to the problem of the families, government and insurance companies. That is also my reason to supporting euthanasia because it alleviates the costs of unnecessary medical bills that are piling up for the care of a terminally ill person. However, euthanasia is a good alternative, it offers relief of extreme pain, provides a change in the quality of life, and the freeing up of medical bills. The results of euthanasia, helps the patient, patient’s family and the economy.
Reason Not to Legalize Euthanasia
According to Tang (2008), there are committees that argue that wider social considerations make Euthanasia practice undesirable. There are those who see euthanasia as a sin and a choice that nobody should make regarding an unethical decision about death.
With today’s world of medicine, there are drugs to help relieve the pain so that one does not have to make a decision, whether to live, die or to save ones dignity. However, people are still unable to deal with these terminal illnesses with severe pain, along with the raising costs of medical care, poor insurance policies or none at all. Hospice should be focus on health care reform for knowledge and the skills to properly treat pain of terminal diseases; this will remove the reason for unethical decision about death (Cundiff, 1992). There is a lot of pressure on the family and the loved ones that are enduring all of the agony, pain and concerns dealing with the decision. Dr. Cundiff believes that patients can in fact live out their days in relative comfort, with love and support from family, friends and health care workers.
Religious conservatives are one the main groups opposing this act of euthanasia. Kirkland (2010) argues that religious conservatives believe that families and high cost medical bills are pressuring the government into allowing doctors and patients to determine when life should end. Other countries like Netherlands has a decline with the use of euthanasia, because of a substitute procedure, Continuous Deep Sedation (CDS), they are using at a fast growing pace (Brimelow, 2009).
Conclusion
After analyzing the reasoning for love ones right to die with dignity, the hypothesis can be accepted that Euthanasia should be legalized and openly practiced by our Government and medical insurance companies as an options. Hopefully, in the near future, Euthanasia is a choice that patients should be allowed to consider and one that the family should respect, regarding them. This also gives the patient an option to stop long-suffering, and the “Freedom to Die with Dignity.”

References
Brimelow, A. (2009). The alternative to Euthanasia? Retrieved October 17, 2011, from BBC News health http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8184108.stm
Cundiff, D. (1992). “Euthanasia is not the answer .” New Jersey Humana Emanuel, E. (1999). "What is the Great Benefit of legalizing Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide ?" Ethics, Vol. 109, No. 3, The University of Chicago Press
Kirkland, M. (2010). The right to die vs. the value of life. Retrieved October 24, 2011, from UPI Top News (US) http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/03/21/US-Supreme-Court-The-right-to-die-vs-the-value-of-life/UPI-43371269156600/
Tang, A. (2008). The changing state of the Euthanasia debate . Retrieved October 21, 2011, from http://www.kairos2.com/euthanasia01.htm#_ftn9
Yount, L, (2000). “Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia .” New York Fact on File 4-12

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...The Right to Die Vicky Perry Writing Workshop 100W Section 5 Mary Juno San Jose State University May 8, 2012 Abstract Euthanasia, the act of killing oneself in order to end pain and suffering, is illegal in the majority of the states in the nation. Euthanasia should be legalized in order to promote autonomy, personal decisions, and the quality of life. Oppositions to legalizing euthanasia include morality, religious beliefs, concern for medical staff violating the Hippocratic Oath, and fear of abuse of the act. Some states have made euthanasia legal under strict circumstances; the rest of the nation should soon follow. Introduction “Dogs do not have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death” (Kundera, 1999). Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. It is a common practice among household pets as a humane way to end their lives if they are suffering. Euthanasia in relation to humans is illegal in the United States as well as many other countries across the world. It is bizarre to think that animals have the right to die when their owners believe they are suffering and in distress, but humans are not granted that same opportunity. Euthanasia, practiced most commonly on animals, has three distinct types in relation to the euthanasia of humans. Voluntary euthanasia, which requires consent...

Words: 2974 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Eithanasia

...in which a person is terminally ill and there is no medical treatment that can defeat this illness, so it is believed that the best choice is the act of intentionally ending his life to relieve the pain and suffering. Although euthanasia may be a solution in some cases, it really devalues human life and it still be considered as a kind of murder so euthanasia should not be allowed in any case. Supporters of euthanasia claim that autonomy, dignity, and individuality are the highest values in people’s life and when you lose them, euthanasia seems a good choice for those whose life has been limited to pain and humiliation, as they fully depend on other people to be cared, and also depend on machines to live. There are some cases about people suffering from terminal illnesses such as AIDS or Cancer, whose pain is unbearable, the medical treatments are useless and their life expectancy is rather poor so do not they deserve the right of having a death full of dignity? Even when this is about ending with a human life, it is an honorable way of ending the life of a person and to end with its suffering. However, according to religious people life has an intrinsic value, as man is created in the image of God and therefore human life has an intrinsic dignity, sanctity and is inviolable. God is the only one who gives life and takes it out. . Human beings are in no position to behave as God and end someone's life. There are many miracles about people, who have terminal diseases, but...

Words: 621 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Euthanasia Essay

...Euthanasia: Quality Above Quantity Inin Life and Death Leanna Smith Cuyahoga Community College ENG 1010 Professor Neel July 20, 2014 Author Note This outline research paper’s final draft was prepared as part of a research project for English 1020, taught by Professor Neel. Abstract Euthanasia is commonly known as physician-assisted suicide. This is the act of a physician providing a terminally ill patient with lethal drugs and administers the drugs in a safe environment. Assisted suicide on the other hand is when the physician or pharmacist prescribes the lethal drugs for the terminally ill patient to take at a time of his or her own choosing. Assisted suicide is legal in 3 states in the United States, while euthanasia is illegal in every state. There are many arguments for and against this debate. The objections are mainly moral or ethical. There are many benefits to allowing assisted suicide in the United States, a couple of them are: less suffering for the patients, keeping the patients’ debts low, and keeping medical resources available for those with hope for more than 6 months to live. Oregon has provided the United States a good example of a state providing an opportunity for a terminally ill patient to control his or her own future. Hopefully with the first 3 states leading the way, the rest of the country will follow. Euthanasia: Quality Above Quantity in...

Words: 2596 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Should Euthanesia Be Legalised in India

...SHOULD EUTHANASIA BE LEGALIZED IN INDIA? Table of Contents I. Abstract 2 II. Introduction 2 III. The Legal and Social Position in India 5 III.1 Religious Views on the issue of euthanasia 7 IV. Legal and Social Position in Canada 8 V. Comparative Analysis 13 VI. Stance of the medical practitioners as per the medical ethics 15 VII. Conclusion 15 Abstract It is often said that every person has a right to life and that too a right to live with dignity. There have been a number of scholars who have argued that the right to life which has been granted to a person would be useless if certain rights ancillary to the right are not being provided to the individual. A few of these rights include the right to food, right to clean and hygienic environment, right to personal liberty, right to make a choice and right to live a dignified life. But on analysing the right with a liberal view and expanding the scope of the ‘right to life’ a little the question that arises is whether the ‘right to life’ include a ‘right to die’? As per a layman’s understanding, the question that whether you want to live or die is a personal decision. The Constitution or any other Law should not dictate that whether we should exercise that right of ours or not. This is because of the prime reason that because the Government, who is making the Law, does not know the problems with an individual’s life therefore it cannot be competent enough to make a decision. However...

Words: 5598 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia

...the last breath of their life with dignity and called it as the euthanasia. It turned out that it has two sides about the point of view towards the euthanasia issue in a positive and negative ways. Although some people against these ideas and claim that it is an unacceptable manner, I certainly disagree about that because it can be proved that the euthanasia is one of the most peaceful ways to escape the great pain for dying people. Euthanasia can be one of the way to relieve the pain and suffering for dying people. As everyone knows that people who have to struggle with the terminal illness always end up in physical and psychological suffering, so some of them wanted to die before the pain is getting worse. According to the news of the Telegraph in 2008 which reported about Val McKay, the British woman who was diagnosed with the multiple sclerosis. She commented with the reporter before she went to the Dignitas, where is the only Swiss facility to accept foreigners for the euthanasia that people should not suffer with their illness, they should...

Words: 1205 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Euthanasia - the Right to Die

...Research Paper Final 12/11/2011 Euthanasia: “The Right to Die” The essential right that can assist today to every human being is life, but when turns out to be affected by a few deplorable conditions of health, which they take the one who endures them to meet in a situation in which there turns out to be imprisoned in an intensive care unit, of which it is not known if it will go out, where its existence is in the tightrope, where it can exist an irreversible exit, where the existence will depend in the future of extraordinary means, connected to machines like the artificial respirator, it is necessary to ask if the life is looking after or prolonging the agony that can take us to the death. Below I will discuss the definition of Euthanasia, some aspects to take for a possible approval, and finally i will discuss some of the points in favor and against euthanasia. For all practical purposes i will take as a definition of euthanasia the following: a patient's right to decide on the form and the time of his death., this within a short definition, but you are looking for the sole purpose the rid a person of their intense suffering, a merciless agony they endure as a result of a serious illness and incurable (for example, some types of cancer, or AIDS). The above mentioned illness or the condition must have been diagnosed sufficiently, so that its irreversibility characteristic, it is such, that determines the death as something inevitable. Within the same definition, the...

Words: 2382 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Euthanasia – Dying Peacefully and with Dignity

...Euthanasia – dying peacefully and with dignity KEVORKIAN (to Wantz): ''Have you gotten any better?'' WANTZ: ''It's gotten much worse. I wish I could have done it a year ago or two years ago. ... I tried loading a gun, but I didn't know how to load one. If you do it yourself, you don't know what you're doing.'' KEVORKIAN: ''Were you tired or apprehensive when you tried it yourself?'' WANTZ: ''No. People say, 'Hang in there. ... ' (But) when you're in my shoes, then you tell me what to do. Until you are, don't tell me what to do.'' (Castaneda) The foregoing conversation took place and was recorded on October 22, 1991, between Doctor Jack Kevorkian, 63, (later nicknamed as “Dr. Death” due to his notorious physician-assisted suicide practice) and Marjorie Wantz, 58, who had sought his help in ending her life and continuous pain from the incurable disease she had. Wantz fulfilled her wish on the next day when she died while being linked to one of Kevorkian’s ''suicide machines''. This incident once again raised a heated debate whether euthanasia should be legalized, and whether doctors assisting in patient’s voluntary death should be freed of charges. In 1995 Special Senate Committee on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide defined euthanasia as “the deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending the life of another person in order to relieve that person’s suffering” (Law and Government Division). Despite the undeniable advantages of modern medicine in terms...

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...Abstract Euthanasia is intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally. The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person’s suffering in this world; it is often called “mercy killing”. Many physicians and psychiatrists believe that it is a humane act; from an ethics point of view, it may be appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be happy, pain free, and find happiness. Suffering from a terminal illness, or affliction, could hamper one’s happiness in life. If the goal is to be happy, then Euthanasia would be an answer for a person. Euthanasia may even bring about happiness in that it is what the person desires and wants, in order to no longer be a burden to his/her family. Also, Euthanasia would stop the pain and not prolong the dying process. Euthanasia has become an issue of increasing attention because of Dr. Jack Kevorkian's assisted suicides. Dr Kevorkian assisted in at least one hundred and thirty one suicides. The number of suicides in Michigan increased, prompting the Governor to sign an anti-suicide law that made doctor-assisted suicides a felony. During the 21-month trial period of the new law anyone assisting in a suicide can be sentenced to up to four years in prison and fined more than $2,000 (Reuters, 1993). With the passing of the law one would think that most people would be against the right-to-die, not so. In a poll cited in a 1991 issue of USA Today eighty percent of Americans think sometimes...

Words: 2055 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Mercy Killing

...escape. anyone born in this world must die, despite the level od medical knowledge and skill. when medical knowldege is certain that a persons illness isn't going to be cured, in other words, he or she is terminally ill, would it not be merciful to allow the person to die? Would not euthanasia--or mercy killing as it is termed--be acceptable to the suffering patient as well as to those who are close to him? mercy killing causes no harm to anyone. in fact, it provides a relief to the realtives of the victims as they undergo immense agony, seeing a dear one suffering. Euthanasia is an act of professional support to the terminally ill patient and hence canot be held as a cruel act on the part of the person who commints it. On the other hand, there is a deep rooted belief that life is a god given gift and it is presumptious on the part of a human being to end it. As for taking it away from another human being, howsoever merciful the motive, it is regarded as playing god. If the patient is terminally ill or in a coma, without having expressed any idea on the subject, who is to decide on terminating the persons life? The possibily of greedy and unscrupuluos relatives colluding with an equally unscrupuluos doctor to kill a patient, is a real danger. Morever, though it is an individual decisiom, it cannot be ignored as a major social problem as it opens up a chapter of suffering for the realtives of the patient. Any law, therefore, on euthanasia should have safeguards to preclude...

Words: 645 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Argumentative Essay: The Legalization Of Assisted Suicide

...What people fear is not the end of their life, but the fragility of their mortality. The topic of euthanasia has been a long term controversy that evokes intense emotions and arguments when mentioned in a conversation. Euthanasia, at its fundamental core, is the consensual act of ending a patient’s life in a painless manner at their own request. Depending on the condition of a person’s illness, this method is a option to provide relief for those suffering due to incurable and unstoppable pain. In many countries, the prohibition of euthanasia can cause terminally ill patients to consider suicide as way to end their agonizing affliction. Taking into consideration the varying medical conditions of patients, the freedom of choice, and the case...

Words: 1049 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...Passive Euthanasia Euthanasia is a very polemic topic in bioethics and it is still illegal in most of the countries. There are a few types of euthanasia, such as active and passive. The passive euthanasia is the act of letting a terminal patient die in a natural way. It means that the doctor will not interfere by giving the patient any kind drug. The patients request the doctor to stop the treatment that is keeping them alive. The author of our text book gives us a few arguments in pro to passive euthanasia. First, the individual rights over bodies and lives, it means that all human being have the freedom to do whatever they want with their lives. Individuals have the right to do whatever they think if better for them. They can get tattoos; they can pierce parts of their body that even God would not believe; they can jump out of a roof when they are depressed, so why not ask for a doctor pull the cord? The second argument is shortening the period of suffering, is this case a terminal patient with no quality of life should not suffer any longer. The doctors and the family should let the patient go if they know that is no chance of recovery. They have to understand that prolonging this patient’s life will just bring them more pain and suffer. The health care professionals and the families should make decisions based on the patient’s best interest. Last but not least the patients’ right to die with dignity, it means that human being have the right of dying distinction. The...

Words: 1393 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Right to Die

...with Dignity If we assume that every human being born into this world has a "right to life," then it logically follows that every human being has a right to end their life (or a "right to die"). Because death is a part of life, a person's right to life logically assumes a right to not have that life. Thus, any law upholding a person's right to life has inherent within that same law a person's right to die, otherwise it would not be a right to life in the true sense of the term. But there is a legal battle going on in America right now over whether or not a person has a right to die. Does the government have the right to prolong your life by artificial means whether you desire it or not? With the passing of this law nationwide, you, as the voter will simply be saying, “It is YOUR choice” (Patashnik, 2004) The issue of “Having a Personal Right to Die,” has been long simmered beneath the surface in legal and political circles: under what circumstances do terminally injured and ill Americans have the right to choose to die? The Supreme Court made a definitive statement in the landmark 1990 case Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health that severely injured patients have a constitutional right to refuse medical treatment and die. But the court also ruled that states can require "clear and convincing" evidence of a patient's intent to forgo medical treatment, a rather high evidentiary standard to meet. History The actual word for “having a right to die” is Euthanasia. According...

Words: 4441 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Are We Moving Towards Assisted Suicide

...Suicide? “Those who have exhausted the end seek the right to die with dignity, this is a choice to die, which allows the body to speak its end rather than have that end dictated by the voice of an expert, legal or medical” (Hannifin. 2009, p.84) The person who seeks to die is, to paraphrase Foucault, ‘the Passenger par excellence: that is, the prisoner of the passage’ (Foucault. 1967, p.11) The European Convention on Human Rights sets out a number of fundamental rights and freedoms, right to life, prohibition of torture, prohibition of slavery and forced labour, right to liberty and security, right to a fair trial, no punishment without law, right to respect and family life, freedoms of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association, right to marry, right to effective remedy, and prohibition of discrimination The Council of Europe produced the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1950. This body was formed in the aftermath of the Second World War to achieve unity among its members in such matters as the protection of fundamental rights. The Convention was drafted after the atrocities of the Second World War. The Convention was signed by the High Contracting Parties in 1950, and came into force in1953. It was ratified by the United Kingdom in 1957. Article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms protects the right to life.[1] The right to life is the first...

Words: 7495 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Ethics

...Physician-assisted suicide is when a patient requests the help of digesting a lethal drug to quicken their death (United States Physician Assisted Suicide Law Summary and Law Digest par. 1). The most common patients to request assisted suicide are patients with cancer and AIDs. Active euthanasia is sometimes also considered physician-assisted suicide because it results in death from someone purposely doing something to the patient causing them to die; such as being injected with poison. Passive euthanasia is the withholding of a medical treatment for a patient, which is legal, but many come to be disagreed upon. Withholding food and water, turning off machines, and failing to resuscitate are prime examples of passive euthanasia (United States Physician Assisted Suicide Law Summary and Law Digest par. 1). There are currently three states that permit physician-assisted suicide, Washington and Oregon. On October 27, 1997, the Death with Dignity Act was passed in Oregon. The Death with Dignity Act states that an Oregonian that is terminally-ill has the right to voluntarily, self-administrate lethal medications with a prescription from their physician. On March 5, 2009, Washington passed the Death with Dignity Act and on December 31, 2009 Montana became the third state to legalize physician-assisted suicide. There is a list of requirements a patient must pass before being able to be considered to follow through with this enactment. A patient has to be diagnosed as a terminally-ill patient...

Words: 1883 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...Euthanasia You have a pet dog that you love very much, but he’s sick. Really sick. In fact, he’s suffering on a constant basis. What do you do? Any ethical person would end the dog’s suffering by taking him to the vet and humanely ending his life. However, that same person would be forced to stand by and watch their spouse, parent, or even their child suffer unimaginable pain. The question is, why does our humanity have to go out the window when dealing with human pain and suffering? Modern government intrudes on our lives in such a constant and consistent manner that it even denies us the intensely personal choice of death when faced with a complete loss of quality of life.  The reasons behind this horrible reality are centered mostly around the fact that religious beliefs affect social policy in our country to a significant degree.  The idea of separation of Church and State seems to have broken down over the years.  Politicians even use their religion as a reason why people should vote for them, when it shouldn’t even be allowed to be a factor in an election.  In fact, for a candidate to state that he’s for mercy killing guarantees that he’ll be attacked politically by religious right-to-life groups that suggest he’s immoral and unfeeling, when the exact opposite is probably true.  However, like abortion, the debate over assisted suicide is an emotionally charged one.  It is nearly impossible to discuss causing death of any kind under any circumstances without...

Words: 1667 - Pages: 7