Intentional Torts

In: Other Topics

Submitted By edavis1999
Words 702
Pages 3
Intentional Tort of Defense
Introduction to Tort
June 7, 2012

On a Saturday night there were an incident between two males and a female in a bar called Bottom’s Up. A man name John had too much to drink and was intoxicated. He was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane that was sitting at a table next to another guy name Leroy, which he was a frequent customer. However, Jane ignored John and continued to drink her beer. When she ignored him than he approached her looking disturbed. Leroy asked John over to the bar for a drink, but John told him to mind his own business. John grabbed Jane’s wrist and when he did Leroy grabbed John’s wrist and put him in a neck hold. John was protesting Leroy to let go of him, but Leroy did not let go. Leroy placed John in a chair and told him not to make a move or he will punch him. After the incident happen Jane told Leroy that John was her husband.
1) Why was Leroy taking upon his self to defend Jane, even though she was a complete stranger? 2) Why did Leroy even put his hands on John, especially if John didn’t touch him? 3) In what ways did assault, battery and false imprisonment come into play in this case?
In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is holding another person down against their will. The reason it is considered defense of persons because Leroy was using reasonable force by protecting Jane the third person from injury where John threatened by an attacking force. According to KRS § 503.070, the only time to use physical force upon another person where it is justifiable is when causing serious injury or provokes the use of physical…...

Similar Documents


...Recognizing and Minimizing Tort and Regulatory Risk In this essay I will explain how regulatory risks may be identified and managed through preventive, detective, and corrective measures for such torts as negligence, product liability and defamation. For most businesses such torts are better handled before they happen. Companies make sure many issues are addressed in the company policy and regulations manuals when new employees are hired as well as in training sessions for topics such as sexual harassment and safety. For a Company such as Firestone Tires and Rubber for example, one type of negligence could be Negligent Hiring. If an employee in a supervisory position verbally abuses another or in an extreme case, assaults another employee with a tire iron used in the performance of his duties, the victim could claim negligent hiring on the part of the company where they both were employed. This could be the case if the aggressive supervisor has had a history of this type of behavior at a previous place of employment. This begs us to ask the question: Has the company made enough effort to fulfill its obligation of providing a safe working environment for its employees? As it was touched on before there are measures that can be taken before something like this happens. For one, the hiring manager could have followed up on references to possibly find out if the candidate for employment has had a history of violence in the workplace, or......

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

...decides to take measures to sue Jerry for intentional infliction of emotional distress for the above allegations. ISSUE Under North Carolina law, do the above allegations fulfill the basis for liability of intentional infliction of emotional distress? RULE Under North Carolina law as iterated in Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 196 (N.C. 1979), Liability arises under this tort when a defendant’s conduct exceeds all bounds usually tolerated by decent society and the conduct causes mental distress of a very serious kind.” Courts also outline the elements needed for a successful tort in the area of intentional infliction of emotional distress in the case of Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A., 339 N.C. 338 (N.C. 1994), “The essential elements of a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress are 1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant 2) which is intended to and does in fact cause 3) severe emotional distress.” Dickens v. Puryear, 302 N.C. 437 (N.C. 1981) goes on to define extreme and outrageous conduct as “so outrageous conduct, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.” Thomas v. Northern Telecom, Inc., 157 F. Supp. 2d 627 (M.D.N.C. 2000) states, “It is extremely rare to find conduct in the employment context that will rise to the level of outrageousness necessary to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional......

Words: 503 - Pages: 3

Business Torts

...Week 3: Business Torts Lexus Nexus By Christine Lyu Keller Graduate School MGMT 520 – Legal, Political, Ethical Dimensions of Business Professor Afiya Whitman September 22, 2013 Esposito-Hilder vs. SFX case Go to Jennings Chapter 9, page 315, problem 5. Use LexisNexis in the Keller library and look up the Esposito-Hilder vs. SFX case. Use the citation you find in your book to do the search.  Read the case and answer these questions. Copy and paste this information into a Word document, include your name on that document, and answer the questions. 1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points) Under the law of defamation and considering the content and general thought process of the entire radio program, the remarks may have been distasteful. However, to the reasonable listener, it would be viewed as an opinion and would not be viewed as an actual fact about the plaintiff. One's physical attractiveness and desirability or lack thereof is, in fact, a matter of subjective opinion, even though under the circumstances it may not give rise to a qualified privilege. For more than a century, it has been widely recognized that "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder." 2. What court decided the case in the assignment? (2 points) The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress.......

Words: 1930 - Pages: 8

Tort Debate

...Torts Julie and Mary are plaintiffs for the J&M Jewelry store that opened in the Sunny Market Place. The defendants are Tom and Fred who own the Deluxe Jewelry in Sunny Market Place. Tom and Fred do not want the competition for their store so they decided to take action against J&M Jewelry and trespassed by entering their store without consent. An intentional tort is the most willful of torts, this intent is not to harm but rather to engage in a specific act, which ultimately results in an injury, physical or economic to another” (Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Meyer, Barkacs, Dhoodge, and Williamson 2012, p. 185). Tom and Fred had no intent on causing physical harm to the plaintiffs; they wanted them to be afraid with the hopes of leaving the premises. The defendants were hoping to scare the ladies away by robbing the store, so they would no longer have competition and keep customers to themselves. Julie was upset with what the defendants did and slapped Tom causing him to push her. Julie did something unlawful by slapping Tom causing an assault and battery, which he returned the harm by pushing her down. Kubasek, Browne, Herron, Meyer, Barkacs, Dhoodge, and Williamson (2012) define the legal principle of assault and battery as “An assault occurs when a person is placed in fear or apprehension of an offensive bodily contact; if the contact occurs, it constitutes a battery “(p. 187). Another tort that occurred in this scenario is the strict liability tort when Tom takes......

Words: 465 - Pages: 2

Tort Reform

...Tort Reform All humans on this earth, whether they live in a crowded city, a sparsely populated farming community, a developed or developing nation or a small tribe in the rainforests of the Amazon, have some way by which their civilization is led and regulated for the safety and comfort of its inhabitants. People living together in near proximity need some sort of social control to regulate conduct and relations be it by laws or morals or both. Ivan Nuy, an author who developed the Social Control Theory in 1958, proposed that there are four types of social control: Internal, Indirect, Control with Needs Satisfaction and Direct. Social Control Theory proposes that people's relationships, commitments, values, norms, and moral beliefs encourage them not to break the law. Thus, if moral codes are internalized and individuals are tied into, (their) community, they will voluntarily limit their propensity to commit deviant acts. [ (Nuy, 1958) ] Law is needed for when comfort, morals and disapproval fail to prevent undesirable acts against people in a society. In our country’s system, we have two main types of classifications for justice, civil law and criminal law. Criminal law, under public law, covers laws and regulations that aim to protect all members of the society. Its emphasis is on punishment. Criminal offenders are prosecuted by government officials, who must provide “the burden of proof” to prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable, doubt, usually a......

Words: 1694 - Pages: 7

Intentional Teaching

...Intentional Teaching and its Importance in Early Childhood Education Introduction: ‘Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire.’ — William Butler Yeats Reflected by an early childhood educator, it is evident the response or idea everyone has when you mention to them that you are an early childhood educator; ‘Oh, you get to play with children all day’ or, in a particular tone, ‘You must love kids’. Very limited is the understanding to how important the role of an educator is, more importantly how critical the role of an educator is in the development of a young child. Onlookers will see an educator involved in play with children but will never truly comprehend the purposeful planning that has been implemented nor the intentional teaching employed to inhibit learning. Similar is the thought process and understanding of most parents. The educators have to promote intentional teaching practices and help parents recognize its true purpose and value in supporting children’s learning and development. This essay aims to explain intentional teaching and its relation to early childhood education and care. This essay will also focus on removing or denunciating any confusion amongst educators questioning the need for intentional teaching or that the practice is a formal instruction in a play-based curriculum. Intentional teaching- Definition and its placement in ECE: ‘Intentional teaching: involves educators being deliberate, purposeful and......

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Intentional Tort

...Breach of Confidentiality in the Professional Health Setting When it comes to the healthcare profession, patients expect the information they give to the receptionist, nurse or doctor be kept in complete privacy. A breach of confidentiality, in the medical field, for example, is when information about a patient is given to another individual without written or oral consent. Trust plays a very viable role in any physician/patient relationship. Without this trust, physicians, nurses, EMTs or any other health care provider is unable to provide the proper care each patient desires and deserves. A breach of confidentiality case occurred in Florida, March of 2000. A Dr. of Psychology breached the confidentiality of a married couple that was seeking his help with their marriage. In the state of Florida, the Supreme Courts follow the common law requirement of the Impact Rule. This rule states that, “physical contact must occur to allow damages for negligent infliction of emotional distress.” Florida has started making exceptions to this rule, like other states that still use the Impact Rule. One important exception to this rule is, the patient must suffer a physical injury caused by a psychological trauma. The trauma could be from seeing, witnessing or otherwise being invovled in an event causing negligent injurt to another. The plaintiff must also have a close personal relationship to the directly injured person. In 1993, Donna and Joseph Gracey rendered services from Dr...

Words: 556 - Pages: 3

Intentional Tort Paper

...release him. Mr. McPhillen then seated John firmly in a chair and ordered him to remain seated or he would punch him. It was after this that the woman informed Mr. McPhillen that John was her husband. ISSUE: (1) Which intentional torts were committed and (2) what are the defenses available to the tortfeasors? Short answer: John and Leroy are both guilty of committing intentional torts. However, both parties have arguable defenses. More information is needed in regards to the events that took place prior to the man assaulting the woman and the amount of time that John was confined by Mr. McPhliien. Prior to determining the appropriate statues and the defenses each party may present, each intentional tort committed must first be explained. Intentional Torts: The first intentional tort was committed by John when he began shouting at the woman, approaching her in an aggressive manner, and by grabbing her wrist. Regardless of his relationship to the woman, John committed Assault and Battery by grabbing the woman’s wrist. The three basic elements of this tort include the tortfeasor making unconsented or harmful contact, the victim is fearful of his or her safety, and the threat of contact if impending. John could also be guilty of committing Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, depending on what he had been shouting at the woman. Okrent, C., & J.D.. (2009). Mr. McPhillen is also guilty of committing Assault and Battery when he physically......

Words: 1129 - Pages: 5

Intentional Torts Od Leroy Mcphillen

...Intentional Torts and Defenses of Leroy McPhillen and John Victoria Downie Kaplan University Professor Randee Breiter Torts and Personal Injury PA165 May 31, 2015 Intentional Torts and Defenses of Leroy McPhillen and John Human and animal nature is defined by the subconscious behavior of the fight or flight instincts. People have the ability to view situations and determine whether they need to fight for their life or run. What sets us apart from animals is that we also have the ability to determine whether other people need us to fight for them when they cannot fight for themselves, as seen in the case of Leroy McPhillen versus John. Leroy McPhillen was a frequent client of Bottom’s Up Pub. One Saturday night Leroy noticed an intoxicated man shouting obscenities at a woman seated at a table within close proximity to Leroy McPhillen’s table. While the woman ignored the man and continued to drink her beverage, Leroy asked the intoxicated man to join him for a beer at the bar. The man mumbled that “Leroy should mind his own business” and proceeded to grab the woman’s wrist. It was at this point that Leroy grabbed the man, later identified as John, by his other arm and neatly twisted behind his back while placing him in a neck hold. John began to protest violently. Leroy then place John in a chair and informed him not to move or he would “have to punch him”. It was at this time the woman, identified as Jane, informed Leroy that the man was in......

Words: 1003 - Pages: 5

Tort Essay

...TORTS ESSAY 1 Art and Bill were leaving work one afternoon when they were approached by Charlie, who was wearing a mask and carrying a gun. Charlie, who suspected Art of having an affair with Charlie’s wife, approached to within ten feet of Art and Bill, aimed the gun at Art and said, AArt, I am going to kill you.@ Art quickly grabbed Bill and pulled Bill in front of him, using Bill as a shield. Charlie fired the gun; the bullet going over the shoulder of Bill and hitting Art in the arm. Charlie then dropped the gun onto the ground and turned to run away. Art, using his uninjured arm, picked up the gun and shot at Charlie as he ran away, hitting him in the leg. Bill was horrified at the prospect of almost being shot, and although he suffered no physical injuries, incurred $5,000 for psychological counseling. Discuss the intentional tort claims, if any, that can be raised in the following lawsuits, and what defenses, if any, that can be asserted: 1. 2. 3. 4. Art v. Charlie. Bill v. Charlie. Bill v. Art Charlie v. Art. MODEL ANSWER FOR TORTS ESSAY 1 I. Art v. Charlie A. Assault. An assault is a volitional act by the defendant which intentionally causes the plaintiff to suffer an apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact. 1. Volitional act. An act is volitional if the defendant voluntarily commits it. Here, Charlie clearly acted volitionally when he aimed the gun at Art and threatened to kill him. 2. Intent. The intent required......

Words: 1182 - Pages: 5


...Kafi Hunter Torts Assignment Module 6 As a result of the crash, Farmer suffered several thousand dollars in damage to his land. Neither Dan nor Pilot suffered any physical injuries. 1. Does Farmer have any claim(s) for damages against Pilot based on intentional tort? Discuss. Intentional tort is a deliberate action to cause harm. The Pilot could not see if the land that she choose to navigate the plane for a safe landing had any crops therefore her intent was not deliberate to destroy the crops. However, the Pilot did trespass on the Farmers land. Trespass is considered an intentional tort and occurs when the violation of an exclusive possession is interfered upon. A trespass violation also gives the owner of the property the right to bring a civil lawsuit and collect damages as compensation for any harm suffered. The Pilot did not have permission to land on the Farmers land when landing the plane. The Pilot also destroyed crops with landing the plane. The Farmer does have a claim against the Pilot based on the intentional tort of trespass. 2. Does Dan have any claim(s) against Pilot for intentional tort? Discuss. Dan could claim battery against the Pilot because she intended to move him out of the way. Battery is an intentional tort and a crime because it is a harmful or offensive contact towards another person. Pilot asked Dan to move out of the way of the exit so that Pilot could leave the plane. Dan choose to remain seated until the Fire Department......

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Tort and Cyber Tort

...TORTS AND CYBER TORTS CHAPTER 12 Section 1: The Basis of Tort Law * A Tort law is designed to compensate those who have suffered a loss or injury due to another person’s wrongful act. It is meant to obtain compensation (monetary damages) or other remedies for the harm suffered. * The purpose of Tort Law: Tort law tries to protect certain things that society recognizes as an interest worth protecting such as property, intangible interests (personal privacy, family relations, reputation, and dignity) * Types of Damages available in Tort Actions: 1. Compensatory Damages – meant to compensate a plaintiff for actual losses such as special damages (compensation by quantifiable monetary losses) or general damages (compensation by nonmonetary aspects of harm suffered, such as pain and suffering). 2. Punitive Damages – Meant to punish the wrongdoers who have committed a reprehensible or egregious act so as to deter others from similar wrongdoing. This can include gross negligence and intentional tort actions Section 2: INTENTIONAL TORTS AGAINST PERSONS * In tort law, intent means only that the actor intended the consequences of his or her act or knew with substantial certainty that specific consequences would result from the act * Assault and Battery: Assault is any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact, including words or acts that create in another person a reasonable apprehension of harmful contact. * False...

Words: 749 - Pages: 3

Tort Essay

...Student ID: 253066 Torts Essay One Essay Questions 1) Does Farmer have any claim(s) for damages against Pilot based on intentional tort? 2) Does Dan have any claim(s) against Pilot for intentional tort? 3) Does Pilot have any claim(s) against Dan for intentional tort? Answer to essay questions Trespass to Land Issue: Is Pilot liable for Trespass to Land? Rule: Trespass to Land is shown where Plaintiff can prove 1) an unlawful intrusion upon a property; 2) intent of intrusion; 3) force, and 4) consequent injury to an owner. Analysis: (Element 1 issue) Did Pilot enter onto Farmers land without Farmers consent? (Element 1 analysis) Pilot lowered and guided the plane at a high speed and landed on the field owned by Farmer. (Element 1 conclusion) Pilot did enter onto Farmers land without his consent. (Element 2 issue) Did Pilot act intentionally? (Element 2 analysis) Pilot had knowledge that she was going to trespass onto Farmers land due to the intrusions such as the plane landing at a high speed. (Element 2 conclusion) Pilot acted intentionally. (Element 3 issue) Did Pilot force her way onto Farmer’s land damaging Farmer’s property? (Element 3 analysis) Pilot guided the plane into a high speed landing onto the field. Due to the rapid descent, the plane caused severe damage to Farmer’s crops. (Element 3 conclusion) Therefore, Pilot did force her way onto Farmer’s land damaging his property. Battery Issue: Did Pilot commit a battery against Dan......

Words: 621 - Pages: 3


...Enterprise Risk Management Everyday someone commits a tort. A tort is act of wrong doing. Torts can be committed by people and by businesses. Torts are any of the following: assault, battery, false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, intentional misrepresentation, defamation of character, negligence, and strict liability. Sometimes torts are intentional and sometimes torts are not intentional. For example, an intentional tort is a fight at a baseball game where there are rival teams playing and a fan from one team punches a fan from the other team in the face all because they do not like the same team. An example of unintentional tort would be a toy manufacturer in China, the company did not realize that the toys were associated with lead paint, which caused bodily harm for some children who bought the product across the United States. Whether intentional or not, there are laws in place that provide a remedy to the party injured by a tort that has been committed. In the products liability case of Non Linear Pro, there were several torts committed. Since the case has to do with a product, strict liability comes into play. When a retailer sells a defective product, they become liable. A retailer, distributor, or manufacturer can be brought into a suit when a defective product is sold. Non Linear Pro also misrepresented the product, which is fraud. It was advised that the product should work in a day and a half, however, after two weeks the product still was not working. The......

Words: 411 - Pages: 2


...Torts Shapo (2003) stated "A tort is a civil wrong in the sense that it is committed against an individual (which includes legal entities such as companies) rather than the state. The gist of tort law is that a person has certain interests which are protected by law. These interests can be protected by a court awarding a sum of money, known as damages, for infringe- ment of a protected interest. Alternatively, by the issuing of an injunction, which is a court order, to the defendant to refrain from doing something" (p.1). This paper will give two scenarios of two different torts. The first tort will be Breach of Fiduciary Duty. The paper will also show how Breach of Fiduciary Duty can be avoided and how the situation could have been avoided. The second tort will be Injurious Falsehood. This paper will also show how Injurious Falsehood can be avoided and how the situation could have been avoided. Breach of Fiduciary Duty Corporation A files for bankruptcy. The directors of the corporation recommend what seems to be a good restructuring plan. The plan relies on maintaining the current business contracts for the success of the corporation. The reconstruction was formulated under false pretenses. After authorization of the plan, the directors of the corporation proceed to reroute the business contracts that would have permitted Corporation A to effectively reorganize to Corporation B. Corporation B is completely owned by the directors of Corporation A. Because of......

Words: 679 - Pages: 3