Premium Essay

Kansas City Works

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Tangie1018
Words 660
Pages 3
1.0 Introduction
Armco Inc. is a steel manufacturer that used to be the sixth largest in its industry in US (in 1990). The Kansas City Works within its Midwestern Steel Division was hit by the decline in the business in the US steel industry despite its good performance in the past. Consequently, it downsized and incurred significant losses in most of the 1980s. This entity produces two primary products including grinding media and carbon wire rod, one being recognized in the industry for its durability while the later being non profitable and only covering some of its fixed costs through volume.
2.0 What’s wrong with the old system?
(a) Inconsistency with organization’s strategy
The Objective of Armco Inc. is maximizing profits and sustaining its position among the leaders in the US manufacturing steel industry. To achieve this objective, Armco has adopted a cost leadership strategy with a broad appeal and has managed to grow bigger through joint ventures and expansion of its product lines in implementing its strategy. However, the strategy adopted by the Kansas City Works is based on differentiation due to its cost disadvantages such as union labor costs and inefficient plant infrastructure.Union labor costs in Kansas City were higher than those of some of its nonunion competitors, particularly those located in the Southeastern U.S. and non-U.S. locations. The Works had an inefficient plant infrastructure because the plant was designed to accommodate five times as many employees as were currently working there.
(b) Subjective performance evaluation
Performance evaluation was made by immediate superior and the division president. The performance evaluations were subjective. They were based on three measures of performance applicable to the position. For example, the performance of Works Manager is evaluated based on three criteria, i.e. plant safety, hard…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs Case Study

...Chad Dellworth Case: Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club: A Baseball Accounting Dispute ACCT 6350 1. How Should Bill Ahern resolve each of the accounting conflicts between the owners and the players? After meeting with both the owners and the players, Bill concludes that the three main accounting areas of concern between both parties are: * 1) Roster depreciation * 2) Player compensation * 3) Owners’ stadium fees In all of three of these conflicts, I noticed that the players tend to make more assumptions about the owners’ intentions than they do factual statements regarding sound accounting principles. I only mention this because Paul, the players’ lawyer, felt that the owners were being greedy and “hiding” profit in their accounting books rather than split their extra income with the players. According to our class reading Accounting for Property, Plant, and Equipment and Other Assets, all assets—in this case being the players—have a depreciation value. Unfortunately, PBPA goes against this statement by claiming that the players shouldn’t be depreciated at all; in fact, they went as far as to say that the players add value if anything. Now I don’t exactly claim to be an expert on baseball myself, but I know enough to safely say that baseball players tend to wear down over time. For example, pitchers are known for having shorter careers by throwing out their arm. Therefore playing baseball has to be taxing, not to mention risky. If anything,......

Words: 441 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs Case

...For the Kansas City Zephyrs, answer and submit these two questions for each item in dispute: Who's correct and why? Roster Depreciation The owners. From 1977 to 2004, sports team owners were allowed to treat 50 percent of the team purchase price as an asset depreciable over no more than 5 years. Deferred portion (20%) of compensation The owners. It is an accrued expense, The Company may owe its own players’ salaries and wages for work performed, but not yet paid. Even though they are to be paid at some future date, they are indicated on the firm's balance sheet from when the firm can reasonably expect their payment, until the time they are paid. Singing bonus The players. Signing bonuses have to be capitalized and amortized over the lives of the contracts. This is because players are signed to play for the team to provide benefits over the lives of their contracts. Non-roster guaranteed payment The players. Payments to the non-roster guaranteed contracts should be expensed when they are paid. A provision has to be set up. A reliable estimate has to be made of the amount of the obligation based on the past history on probability of players getting injured and not being picked by another team. Stadium rent The owners. The stadium pricing agreement would have to go through a market valuation to see if it provided transparency and accuracy. As related party transactions cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis unless such representations can be...

Words: 305 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Kansas City Notes

... PROJ | MODEL | TYPE | STRUCTURAL | ELECTRICAL | EXT. PAINTING | INT. PAINTING | GLASS WINDOW | CARPENTRY & TILE WORKS | Concrete Moulding | Steel Railings | Private Pole | | | | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | OLD | ADJUSTED | kansas | JANUARY |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 6,974.00 | - | 90,094.00 | - | 60,508.25 | - | 11,444.75 | 23,000.00 | 24,800.00 | - | 1,200.00 | | FEBRUARY |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 6,818.80 | - | 51,150.00 | - | 55,000.00 | - | 10,500.00 | 17,000.00 | 18,300.00 | - | 1,200.00 | | MARCH |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 4,527.50 | - | 42,315.00 | - | 40,000.00 | - | 620.00 | 15,000.00 | 16,200.00 | - | 1,200.00 | | APRIL |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 3,847.83 | - | 42,315.00 | - | 40,000.00 | - | 526.93 | 15,000.00 | 16,200.00 | - | 1,200.00 | | MAY |   |   | 100,000.00 |   | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 |   | 3,065.12 |   | 42,315.00 |   | 40,000.00 |   | 419.74 | 15,000.00 | 16,200.00 |   | 1,200.00 | | JUNE |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 4,644.60 | - | 34,100.00 | - | 30,000.00 | - | 820.00 | 7,900.00 | 8,500.00 | - | 1,200.00 | | JULY |   | - | 100,000.00 | - | 15,000.00 | - | 13,000.00 | - | 3,076.65 | - | 34,100.00 | - | 30,000.00 | - | 660.08 | 7,900.00 | 8,500.00 | - | 1,200.00 | ......

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment

...traditional routine patrol in marked police cars does not appear to affect the level of crime. Nor does it affect the public’s feeling of security. The experiment demonstrated that urban police departments can successfully test patrol deployment strategies, and that they can manipulate patrol resources without jeopardizing public safety. Patrol is considered the backbone of police work. Billions of dollars are spent each year in the United States to maintain and operate uniformed and often superbly equipped patrol forces. The assumption underlying such deployment has been that the presence or potential presence of officers patrolling the streets in marked police cars deters people from committing crime. But the validity of this assumption had never been scientifically tested. And so, in 1972, with funding and technical assistance from the Police Foundation, the Kansas City Police launched a comprehensive, scientifically rigorous experiment to test the effects of police patrol on crime. THE EXPERIMENT The experiment began in October 1972 and continued through 1973; it was administered by the Kansas City Police Department and evaluated by the Police Foundation. Patrols were varied within 15 police beats. Routine preventive patrol was eliminated in five beats, labeled "reactive" beats (meaning officers entered these areas only in response to calls from residents). Normal, routine patrol was maintained in five "control" beats. In five "proactive" beats, patrol was......

Words: 1513 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Kansa City

...John’s company currently has a 40% share of a 1 million unit market. The current price for his product is $100, but in a direct attempt to gain market share from a competitor, he is considering lowering the price of his company’s product by 10% in an attempt to increase market share to 50%. Marketing expenses and cost per unit will remain at the level of 15% of sales and $70, respectively. 1. Assuming no competitive response and that the price cut resulted in a market share increase to 50%, what would the impact be on net marketing contribution as a result of this action? Show your work. a) an increase of 12.5% b) a decrease of 20% c) a decrease of 17% d) no net change in net marketing contribution e) not enough information to determine the impact on net marketing contribution C D E F G CASE 1-1 Given Calculation Formula 18 Total Demand $1,000,000.00 19 Market Share 0.4 20 Average Selling Price/case $100.00 21 Variable Selling Price/case $70.00 22 Marketing&Sales Expense $60,000.00 $60,000.00 =(D18*D19)*0.15 23 24 Sales Revenue $40,000,000.00 D18*D19*D20 25 Cost of Goods Sold $28,000,000.00 =D18*D19*D21 26 Percent Margin 0.30 =(E24-E25)/E24 27 Net Marketing Contribution (NMC) $11,940,000.00 =D18*D19*D20*E26-D22 C D E F G Given Calculation Formula 34 Total Demand $1,000,000.00 35 Market Share 0.5 36 Average Selling......

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kansas City Case

...Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc.   Answer and submit these two questions for each item in dispute:  Who's correct and why?  for the Kansas City Zephyrs (6 points). ​ ​In this baseball accounting dispute case I would rule towards the side of the players.  First and foremost, their case on roster depreciation is a good point, because one, this is not done in any other industry when referring to staff or labor, and from a performance standpoint the way you may be able to determine if depreciation is present it could be determined by how much a player is playing in comparison to the previous year(s).  And in most cases if a player is actually “depreciating”, they will be put on waivers or released.  Next, deferred salaries should be accounted for in the fashion as pointed out by the PBPA, because if the owner’s actually do not pay this money in this fiscal year then that money would be assumed to be earning interest or invested.  The third point, referring to stadium operations would definitely need to be analyzed extremely close, because any situation where monies shifting from the right pocket to the left pocket, the rates can not vary from the going rate for these services or properties, because otherwise those transactions might as well be laundering.   Ultimately, the accounting policies and procedures practiced by the owners would lend one to question all of their financial reports because their acts up until this point would cause you to think antitrust issues......

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs Case

...Kansas City Zephyrs Case This case is a good example of the “earnings game”. A dispute arose between the baseball team owners and the players association on the true profitability of the baseball business. The case describes 3 main areas for which the accounting is being disputed: * Roster depreciation * Player compensation * Current Roster Salary - Deferred Compensation * Amortization of Signing Bonuses * Non-Roster Guaranteed Roster Expense * Transfer pricing of related party operations (stadium costs) Roster Depreciation 1. Who is Right? The Players 2. Why? The owners capitalized and amortized 50 percent of the purchase price ($12 million) simply because the tax rules allowed it; therefore the depreciation was spread over six years and comes to a total of $2M deduction in income per year. However the players argue that they become more experienced over time, therefore no depreciation is necessary; instead, they argue, given this fact there should be an appreciation of the roster and not the other way around. The truth is that Revenues are influenced by the performance of players as the better the team does, the more fans come. Therefore, player rosters both appreciate and depreciate depending on the season and the overall success of the team including; new recruits, season statistics (wins/losses) etc, therefore it shouldn’t be a consistent depreciation simply because the IRS allows it, but should reflect the actual situation in......

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyr

...Focus of the Class: Accounting reports are often used in contracting. In this situation, baseball team owners and the players differ on the financial results of operations. An arbitrator has to decide which income number best represents a team's financial performance for the purpose of arbitration. Questions: 1. Who do you think is correct about the true profitability of Kansas City Zephyrs – the owners or the players? a. both are correct on different issues and there is one issue that is undecided because the facts are not there 2. What is your recommendation regarding the particular accounting disagreements between the owners and the players? b. see below 3. Looking ahead to the sale of the luxury boxes, how should the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club account for the up front $250,000 cash payment? c. side with OPC Situation * problem is how to define 'good accounting methods' * protagonist is Bill Ahern - arbitrator in dispute between OPC and PBPA * difficult issues involving the accounting unit, depreciation, amortization of intangibles and related-party transactions Content Inventory * why is the roster (players as assets?) being depreciated by owners? * why is there a significant difference between the current roster salary? * why are the signing bonuses being amortized by the players? Hypothesis * non-roster guaranteed contract expense * OPC - expense the whole amount in 2005 because they......

Words: 636 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyers

...Kansas City Zephyrs There are 5 items of dispute between the owners and the players. These items are : 1. Roster depreciation 2. Current roster salary 3. Amortization of signing bonuses 4. Non-roster guaranteed contract expense 5. Stadium operations The owners claim that they are making losses in the financial years 2004- 2005 whereas players are calming that owners are using accounting tools to hide profits thereby depriving players of their rightful amount in compensation and other benefits. Each item of the dispute has been analyzed below to find out who is correct and why. 1. Roster Depreciation: I believe that the owner’s way of roster depreciation is apt and has no accounting flaw. Straight line depreciation is widely used across many types of business around the world. At the end of the useful life of the players, their accounting value will be zero. If there is no depreciation fund, the owners will have to spend additional amount to replace them by signing contracts with new players. 2. Current roster salary: I think players are correct here because only that part of the expense should be considered in the current year which has been actually paid out in current year only and should not include the future expenses. This is because no one knows whether both parties will be able to perform the contract next year or in future years. Some reasons of non-performance include: • Owners/ Club go bankrupt. • Players are bought by other clubs with......

Words: 721 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Kansas City Southern Company Analysis

...Kansas City Southern Analysis Report Prepared for Vice President of Acquisitions Prepared by October 27, 2015 October 27, 2015 Kansas City Southern Analysis Report Prepared for Vice President of Acquisitions Prepared by October 27, 2015 October 27, 2015 To: From: Subject: Kansas City Southern Analysis Report Date: 10/27/2015 Kansas City Southern Introduction Kansas City Southern, founded in 1887, is a railway transportation company that covers the southern part of the US, Mexico, and Panama. It serves both commercial and industrial sectors (Kansas City Southern, 2014). The following report will cover the company’s growth potential, the competitive ratio analysis, the competitive edge it has over the other companies and the key aspects of the industry and how KCS fits in. The summary of the overall position of the company helps in guiding the purchasing decision. Ratio Analysis Looking at key ratios between Kansas City Southern and the rail industry, you will notice some positive and negatives points of interest between the two. The first key figure you will notice is the annual sales is significantly lower than the industry at 2.58B vs. an industry average of 10.5B. This is expected though because KCS is one of the smallest companies in the industry. Looking at profit margins, KCS does not perform up to the industry averages with gross profit margin, net profit margin, as well as pretax profit margin. The reason for......

Words: 2589 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs Assignment

...In the case study of the Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. Bill Ahern the arbitrator was assigned to resolve the issue on the parties’ agreeing on the true profitability of the major league baseball teams. Both Zephyr’s owners and players disagree on three different areas: a) Roster depreciation, b) Overstated Player Salary Expense which entails current signing bonuses, roster salary, amortization of and non-roster guaranteed contract expense; and c) Related-Party Transactions (Stadium Operations). Roster Depreciation The owners recognize depreciation of a value placed on the player roster at the time the baseball club was purchased apparently because tax rules allowed them to do so. Tax rules allow this value to be set arbitrarily at a maximum of 50% of the purchase price. According to the owners the depreciation is capitalized and is being depreciated over six years. The players do not feel that any roster depreciation should be shown. They believe that the roster depreciation is providing numbers without any significance. The players further argue that depreciation expenses only arise when a team is sold therefore there can be two identical teams that reflect different results if one was sold and the other was not. Moreover, the players argue that rosters should appreciate not depreciate as players become more experienced with time. Economically speaking a baseball clubs’ most valuable asset is its player’s rosters and they obviously appreciate and......

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs

...KANSAS CITY ZEPHYRS BASEBALL CLUB Amortization of signing bonuses: Owners: They have considered “signing bonus” as an expense in the year they are paid (=$12540) Players: Think that signing bonuses are part of the compensation package and for accounting purpose the bonuses should be spread over the term of the player’s contract (=$7818) Our opinion: Agree with the player’s view that signing bonuses have to be capitalized and amortized over the lives of the contracts. This is because players are signed to play for the team to provide benefits over the lives of their contracts. Since we don’t have exact contract periods of all the players. We have used the value proposed by the player’s income statement (=$7818). Non-roster guaranteed contract expenses (payment made to injured players) Owners: They have considered cash paid in 2005 + amount owed to the players over their contract period (=$11875). This is because they are not serving to bring in revenue. They think that it is conservative to recognize those losses now. Players: Think that payment to non-roster players should be recognized when the cash is paid out, not when the players leave the roster (=$4750). Further they think that it is possible that these players’ contracts may be picked up by another team, they Zephyrs have to recognize gains because the liability it has set-up would no longer be payable. Our opinion: Agree with the player’s view that payments to the non-roster guaranteed contracts should......

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs

...Refer to the Kansas City Zephyrs reading from earlier in the week. For each of the 5 areas in dispute, answer the following: Who is right? Why? 1. Roster Depreciation The players are right. All players believe that depreciation is not required because the players improve their skills through their years of experience. Also, they believe the roster appreciates through the years. The appreciation and depreciation of the player rosters are based on the player’s talent, scouting, and coaching which will increase the value of the roster. 2. Deferred Salary In this case, the owners are right because the players highly believe that deferred compensation expenditure should be expensed when the cash is exhausted. This is incorrect on the player’s part. However, deferred compensation should be expensed when it is earned, not when cash is exhausted. 3. Signing Bonuses In this area of the case, the players are right. Players recommend that signing bonuses should be paid during the years of the contract instead over the life of the contract. The owners pay these sign on bonuses and consider them as an expense for that year, which is beneficial to the owner. In my opinion, these bonuses should be amortized because they are expected to deliver benefits over the lives of their contracts. 4. Non-roster Guaranteed Contract Expenses All of the players agree and suggest that any such payments should be expensed as they are made and the owners......

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Kansas City Zephyrs

...Katelynn Tax 1/18/16 Kansas City Zephyrs Baseball Club, Inc. 2006 There are five main points of difference between the accounting methods of players and owners. The five main differences appear in roster depreciation, current roster salary, amortization of signing bonuses, non-roster guaranteed contract expense, and stadium operations. The following paragraphs analysis the main points above. Owners take 50% of purchase price of $228 million and depreciate it for 6 years this amounts to $19,000 a year in depreciation. While players on the other hand believe there should be no depreciation until the team is sold. They also believe that depreciation isn’t valid because players tend to improve their skills through time and therefore would increase roster value not decrease it. In my opinion I would have to side with the owners on this because generally many firms use straight line depreciation and its fairly common for depreciation to be done that way. Depreciation expenses are typically calculated at (total acquisition cost – salvage value)/useful life. It is possible that there could be no useful life or salvage value if other owners do not buy it and therefore depreciation should still remain as the owners have calculated. I also would like to note that not all players get better over time because of age, or recurring injuries so I believe that the teams do not increase roster value. In fact, I believe in the long run teams stay fairly the same with regards to performance...

Words: 786 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kansas City

...Financial Accounting July 2012 Session 3 Kansas City Zephyrs and Inventories Jacob Cohen MIT Sloan School of Management 1 Kansas City Zephyrs – Setting I Kansas City Zephyrs – Setting II What are the owners’ incentives? What are the players’ incentives? Kansas City Zephyrs – Discussion Take-Away slide I Kansas City Zephyrs • A case where financial statements are used to resolve an internal dispute • Distinct from Shrek 2, which focused on the effect of accounting choices on external stakeholders (in particular, shareholders). Take-Away slide II The role of incentives • Whether the cup is half-full or half-empty depends on the incentives. • “No one ever said accounting is an exact science” The role of judgment • Timing decisions that affect revenue/expense recognition • Which decision you take depends on the objective Public vs. private accounting • When reporting to the public, a firm must follow GAAP. • In resolving internal disputes this may not always be true. Inventory 7 Overview In today’s class we will cover inventories: • Understanding the Inventory Equation • LIFO and FIFO cost-flow assumptions • LIFO tax conformity rule • Inventory accounting: IFRS vs. GAAP • Disclosures regarding cost flow assumptions 8 Two Main Issues Inventory accounting has two fundamental components: 1) Product Costing Decision: What costs are included in each product's inventory......

Words: 2286 - Pages: 10