Premium Essay

Leadership In Ayn Rand's Anthem

Submitted By
Words 719
Pages 3
In the end of the story Anthem by Ayn Rand, the character Equality 7-2521 denounces his leaders morally and becomes very critical of them. In my opinion that is totally justifiable considering what the leaders of his society have, and are currently doing to people. He feels cheated out of the wonders of life, and knows that for all these years, people have never been allowed to see the beauty in the world.

The council have, and are currently treating people like Human garbage. The council torture and kill people for little reason. For example, one night equality 7-2521, was caught out at night past curfew, and he ran into a council member. When they asked where Equality had been he said, “We will not tell you” (Chapter 6, Paragraph 5). Then without any …show more content…
If it was not perceived and created by the scholars, then it is a horrible and evil idea in their eyes. If one member of the council does not agree with an idea, then it is a bad idea. In the story, Equality 7-2521 creates a box that has a piece of metal wire in it, and electricity running through that wire to produce light. He shows his creation to the scholars and they just turn it down saying that it is an evil device that needs to be destroyed. They insult the box saying that the candle was far more superior to the light box because the candle was created by the great minds in the council of scholars.

They give no personal freedoms to anyone. All first-person perspective words are not even in their vocabulary. They use words like “We”, and “They” when speaking about themselves. They will not even allow people to have a choice in what happens to them, whether that be a friend, or even an occupation. It is all chosen for them. “Then they said: “Street Sweeper”” (Chapter 1, Paragraph10). In the story, Equality is writing a paper, and he says, “It is a sin to write this” (Chapter 1, Paragraph 1) because they won’t even allow people to write down anything, let alone their

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Dystopia In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...In Ayn Rand’s Anthem, mankind destroys all traces of their materialistic and individualistic past to form a utopia. This so-called utopia is actually more of a dystopian society. Dystopias are defined as an imagined place that is usually totalitarianistic and environmentally degraded. Anthem’s society is one of these societies, due to the tyrannical leadership, lack of technological advancements, the indoctrination of people, beginning at birth, and the loss of individualism. The tyrannical leadership is shown through the ruthless enforcement of unreasonable laws. People were “burned alive in the square of the City” (Rand 49), and theft was punishable by “ten years in the Palace of Corrective Detention” (Rand 18). Technology was also severely...

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fahrenheit 451: A Comparative Analysis

... This is the dystopian setting of George Orwell's 1984, Ayn Rand's Anthem, and Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, where the motif of collectivism and control works to convey the message that collectivism and control make totalitarian control second nature. Totalitarian control through collectivism plants its seeds through childhood brainwashing. In the book 1984, brainwashing is carried out through organizations such as the Junior Spies and the Junior Anti-Sex League. Winston says, "… by means of organizations...

Words: 768 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Equality In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...Ayn Rand’s Anthem depicts the dystopian future in which an unnamed society has completely “forgotten” the word ‘I’. While reading Anthem, Ayn Rand introduces Equality 7-2521, the hero who breaks away from the status quo of the unnamed society. Collectivism is the immoral guide for the unnamed society, a guide that Equality challenges to the extent of its extremities. The dictatorial leadership of this society restricts even thinking about one’s self, no one person is obliged to give priority to an individual. Thereupon, we see Equality’s entrance into the society, just by his physical characteristics rebelling against the status quo, being both too tall and too smart. Equality faces his own internal conflicts, he, in his misunderstanding, struggles to understand the gravity of his actions and his true differences from the society’s collectivism....

Words: 896 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Northouse: What Makes A Good Leader?

...conscience out of fear of change. In moments such as these, often exemplified by protagonists in novels and television, one can examine the ways leaders are defined and are distinct from the general population. In examining these defining elements using insights from classic literature, modern television, and a variety of theoretical approaches to leadership featured in Northouse’s leadership text, it becomes apparent that leaders can know they are working for a good cause through their intuition and search for knowledge and meaning. Further, leaders verify the justness of their cause by practicing delegation, observation, and integrity. First and foremost, a leader can be sure they are working towards a good cause when they seek information, meaning, and purpose within an objective. Good leaders observe their surroundings, carefully taking in a plethora of information from various perspectives about a situation, and then decide upon the best plan of action. For example, in 1984, Winston’s initial mistrust in his government comes primarily from his observations...

Words: 980 - Pages: 4