Premium Essay

Leni Riefenstahl's Influence On The Cinematic World

Submitted By
Words 1149
Pages 5
When thinking about influential women in film, Marilyn Monroe and Katherine Hepburn are names that come to mind because of their work in front of the camera. However, less known, yet possibly more influential than them in the cinematography business, Leni Riefenstahl shaped the cinematic world through her work behind the camera. Although being on the “wrong side of history” in terms of her alleged alliance with Nazi dictator, Adolf Hitler, having the influence of the Nazi philosophy shaped her films as the innovative pieces of work many recognize. Through several filming techniques, Leni Riefenstahl was a renowned film director in the 1930’s who was famous for her relationship between the Nazi Party and her relationship influenced the development and message of her films while also executing phenomenal and groundbreaking cinematography in the 20th century and its influence today. The 1930’s was …show more content…
Although Leni Riefenstahl’s propaganda films were detrimentally damaging to her career she is often praised on the aesthetics that framed her film as innovated and creative. “Riefenstahl manipulated events for the viewers, creating a work of cinematic power and strength in order to allure viewers rather than tell them the truth. The film is not a documentary as Frumkes explains, but more of a staged, massive production funded by the UFA in order to produce a major influential propaganda work about the Nazi party and its supposed beliefs.” (Boland paragraph 13). Leni Riefenstahl was considered a cinematic genius with her use of different techniques from lighting to frame shots. Continually referencing back to Triumph des Willens, her crafty editing and carefully choreographed shots helped personified Hitler as a godlike figure in German society and the Nazi party as a glamorous, highly-moral group fighting for peace and

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Film Essay

...THE RULES OF THE GAME: NOUVELLE EDITION FRANCAISE/THE KOBAL COLLECTION DEEP FOCUS CANON FODDER As the sun finally sets on the century of cinema, by what criteria do we determine its masterworks? BY PAU L SC H RA D E R Top guns (and dogs): the #1 The Rules of the Game September-October 2006 FILM COMMENT 33 Sunrise PREFACE THE BOOK I DIDN’T WRITE I n march 2003 i was having dinner in london with Faber and Faber’s editor of film books, Walter Donohue, and several others when the conversation turned to the current state of film criticism and lack of knowledge of film history in general. I remarked on a former assistant who, when told to look up Montgomery Clift, returned some minutes later asking, “Where is that?” I replied that I thought it was in the Hollywood Hills, and he returned to his search engine. Yes, we agreed, there are too many films, too much history, for today’s student to master. “Someone should write a film version of Harold Bloom’s The Western Canon,” a writer from The Independent suggested, and “the person who should write it,” he said, looking at me, “is you.” I looked to Walter, who replied, “If you write it, I’ll publish it.” And the die was cast. Faber offered a contract, and I set to work. Following the Bloom model I decided it should be an elitist canon, not populist, raising the bar so high that only a handful of films would pass over. I proceeded to compile a list of essential films, attempting, as best I could, to...

Words: 11026 - Pages: 45