Market Structure and Game Theory

In: Business and Management

Submitted By anad77
Words 771
Pages 4
Given the demand curve in the following graph, find (and label) the monopolist’s profit-maximizing output and price. In this graph the monopolist’s profit-maximizing output is equal 3 and the monopolist’s profit-maximizing price is equal 8.

2. Show graphically an example of a monopolist that is producing the profit-maximizing output, but is not making a profit. The monopolist loss when the Average Total Cost exceeds the price that the monopolist can charge at the profit maximizing level of output.

3. Suppose the demand curve for a monopolist is Qd= 500-P, and the marginal revenue function is MR= 500-2Q. The monopolist has a constant marginal and average total cost of $50.00 per unit.

a. Find the monopolist’s profit-maximizing output and price.

Qd= 500-P MR =500-2Q ATC= 50 MC=50

MR = MC Qd= 500 - P
500- 2Q = 50 225 = 500 – P
-2 Q = 50 -500 = -450 - P= 225-500 = -275
Q= -450/-2 = 225 P= 275

The monopolist’s profit-maximizing output is 225, and the monopolist’s profit-maximizing price is 275.

b. Calculate the monopolist’s profit.

PR = TR – TC = (P * Q) – TC = ( 225 * 275 ) – ( 225 * 50) = 50625

The monopolist profit is 50625

c. What is the Lerner Index for this Industry?

L = ( P – MC ) / P = 275- 50 / 275 = 0.82

2. a. Define the term: Dominant Strategy.

Dominant Strategy is the strategy that result in the best outcome to given company in the Industry, no matter what action or choice the other company makes.

b. Define the term: Nash equilibrium.

Nash equilibrium is the strategy that managers choose that is the best for them, given the assumption that their competitors will choose its best strategy.

Monopolistically Competitive Industry

Introduction

This “paper” has been prepared to select a product that operates within a monopolistically…...

Similar Documents

Game Theory

...Game Theory On Gallerie Apex Vs Bata Submitted to Abu Reza Mohammad Muzareba Lecturer Department of Marketing University of Dhaka Submitted by Group: Gamers Section: A Batch: 17th Department of Marketing University of Dhaka Submission date: 21th April, 2012 AbuReza Mohammad Muzareba Lecturer University of Dhaka Dept. of Marketing Subject: Letter of transmittal Dear Sir, Enclosed is a report on the Game theory Between Gallerie Apex and Bata. This report is about the internal and external business strategies of the pioneer footwear company Gallerie Apex and Bata. We were assigned to submit this report in 21th April 2012 to be submitted as a term paper for our Business Mathematics 2 course in the 3rd semester of our BBA program, from the department of Marketing of University of Dhaka. We have completed it whilst trying to meet all its broad and specific objectives within the allotted time. We are submitting the report to you only, as our course instructor and will be keeping a copy for any future references. We have organized our findings about the business strategies of the above mentioned trading companies. This paper includes an introduction to the company in focus, in terms of their business strategies and an analysis of those processes with some possible recommendations. It has been completed with a conclusion. At the end of the report...

Words: 3169 - Pages: 13

Game Theory

...Is Game Theory the Right Kind of Game? Game theory is an analysis of a conflict of interest to find optimal choices that will lead to desired outcome under given conditions. It’s a study of ways to win in a situation given the conditions of the situation. Game theoretic concepts apply whenever the actions of several agents are interdependent. These agents may be individuals, groups, firms, or any combination of these. The concepts of game theory provide a language to formulate structure, analyze, and understand strategic scenarios. Game theory provides a nice conceptual or theoretical framework for thinking about multi-agent learning. It is most appropriate provided that the game is stationary and fully specified, other agents are also game theorists, it can solve equilibrium coordination problem. Given the said conditions, it is rarely hold in real applications because firms think differently from each other. We can say that game theory is the right kind of game if we are able to make use of it properly to win in a given situation. This game theory can provide insight into the strategic options and likely outcomes available to participants in particular situations. From this insight, decision-makers can better assess the potential effects of their actions, and can make decisions that will more likely produce the desired goals and avoid conflict. Considering the situation as a game would lead you to think that everyone is a participant which in reality not all......

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Game Theory

...Game Theory Themes 1. Introduction to Game Theory 2. Sequential Games 3. Simultaneous Games 4. Conclusion Introduction to Game Theory Game theory is the branch of decision theory concerned with interdependent decisions. The problems of interest involve multiple participants, each of whom has individual objectives related to a common system or shared resources. Because game theory arose from the analysis of competitive scenarios, the problems are called games and the participants are called players. But these techniques apply to more than just sport, and are not even limited to competitive situations. In short, game theory deals with any problem in which each player’s strategy depends on what the other players do. Situations involving interdependent decisions arise frequently, in all walks of life. A few examples in which game theory could come in handy include: ● Friends choosing where to go have dinner ● Parents trying to get children to behave ● Commuters deciding how to go to work ● Businesses competing in a market ● Diplomats negotiating a treaty ● Gamblers betting in a card game All of these situations call for strategic thinking – making use of available information to devise the best plan to achieve one’s objectives. Perhaps you are already familiar with assessing costs and benefits in order to make informed decisions between several options. Game theory simply extends this concept to interdependent decisions, in which the options being evaluated are functions of...

Words: 3051 - Pages: 13

Game Theory

...Game Theory∗ Theodore L. Turocy Texas A&M University Bernhard von Stengel London School of Economics CDAM Research Report LSE-CDAM-2001-09 October 8, 2001 Contents 1 What is game theory? 2 Definitions of games 3 Dominance 4 Nash equilibrium 5 Mixed strategies 6 Extensive games with perfect information 7 Extensive games with imperfect information 8 Zero-sum games and computation 9 Bidding in auctions 10 Further reading 4 6 8 12 17 22 29 33 34 38 This is the draft of an introductory survey of game theory, prepared for the Encyclopedia of Information Systems, Academic Press, to appear in 2002. ∗ 1 Glossary Backward induction Backward induction is a technique to solve a game of perfect information. It first considers the moves that are the last in the game, and determines the best move for the player in each case. Then, taking these as given future actions, it proceeds backwards in time, again determining the best move for the respective player, until the beginning of the game is reached. Common knowledge A fact is common knowledge if all players know it, and know that they all know it, and so on. The structure of the game is often assumed to be common knowledge among the players. Dominating strategy A strategy dominates another strategy of a player if it always gives a better payoff to that player, regardless of what the other players are doing. It weakly dominates the other strategy if it is always at least as good. Extensive game An extensive game (or......

Words: 13879 - Pages: 56

Game Theory

...Rachel Dillie SOS-360 Final Project March 25, 2014 Game Theory “Game theory is the study of strategic interaction among rational players in an interactive setting” (Stevens, Lecture 1). Elements of a game consist of common knowledge, the players, strategies and payoffs. Every other Friday night my wife and I play cards at our friend’s house and it generally gets more intense as the game and the drinks progress. We mainly play a card game called spades and we play as partners. Common knowledge in this game is every player knows that in order to win you have to bid the correct number of books, meaning you have to guess how many rounds you and your partner can win based off what cards you are holding and what you think the other players are holding in their hands. Each player also is assumed to be an experienced player unless otherwise stated and even if they are it’s easier to guess how the hand will play out. In this card game there is not strictly a pure strategy at play, meaning it doesn’t not involve an act of randomness but a game of mixed strategy. Mixed strategy means using a pure strategy with acts of randomness. I have an idea what the other players will do when it is their turn in the card game but sometimes to force their hand, it is necessary to randomly sacrifice one of your cards to make them display their higher ranked cards. The payoff to a player reflects what that player cares about, not what another player thinks they should care about. Being......

Words: 2875 - Pages: 12

Game Theory

...GAME THEORY & ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION LITERATURE REVIEW NATHALIA PALOMINO ID# 0501605 MARCH 1, 2014. FACILITATOR: SHELLEY WHITTLE Introduction This paper will firstly address game theory, Prisoners Dilemma which is a very prominent game and Bargaining. Asymmetric Information is also discussed along with a few examples of how asymmetric information relates to the business environment. The writer gives the reader a basic understanding of game theory and asymmetric information uses in a logical manner. As many opinions are combined to critically analyse the aforementioned. Game Theory A definition of Game Theory or something that appears to be a definition may be applied as such: An analytical or mathematical approach of examining strategic interaction when dealing with competitive situations in business decisions. As Keat, Young & Stephen (2014) did not give a clear definition of Game Theory. This definition stated business decision however, Martin (1978) stated that Game theory has proved useful in only war and economic. He states, “I see that at least three ways in which game theory has proved ‘useful’. First, it has led to practical advice on tactical decision-making in certain well defined situations, especially in military areas involving missile tracking and similar task (where the theory of differential games has led to results equivalent to control theory). Second, it has provided an occupation and amusement for thousands of government......

Words: 2354 - Pages: 10

Market Structure

...Differences in the Market Structures In economics there are four main market structures: perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Each of these market structures faces the common factor of competition. Various degrees of competition are what separate these market structures. Secondly, the commodity or product plays a huge role in these market structures because some products have substitutes or identical products. Lastly, we will observe the barriers to which a firms face when entering or exiting the market. This is a very important factor in the market structures because relative difficulty in entry and exit of the markets will determine what type of market structure we are examining. Market structures are based on two extremes known as perfect competition and monopoly. Oligopolies lie in the middle of this spectrum. A comparison and contrast of each market structure in short term and long term scenarios will be detailed in the following paper. Perfect competition and Monopoly In a Perfect competition there are four conditions that characterize the perfect competition structure: a large number of buyers & sellers, free entry & exit, product homogeneity, and perfect information. Each of these aspects is compared when examining the differences between monopoly and perfect competition. First in perfect competition there are a large number of small firms. Perfectly competitive firms’ demand curves are perfectly elastic while a......

Words: 2639 - Pages: 11

Market Structure

...Market structure Name Course Title Date of Submission University Name Tutor Name Economic theory tells us that market structures can be of 4 main types depending on parameters like no of buyers and sellers, government regulation, ease of entry and exit, and the extent of product differentiation as well as interdependence among firms. In this case,, restaurant business is part of a market structure that is neither an oligopoly nor perfectly competitive. It is best described as monopolistic competitive structure. This structure has some feature described below ▪ Relatively Large Number of Sellers: The number of firms is lesser than in perfect competition, but each firm has some limited monopoly over its product. Each firm enjoys some freedom to fix prices, as it enjoys small, but significant market share. The attachment provided clearly states that the ,’outdoor furniture market is.. highly competitive’. There are many players-34000 in fact for 2.5 million people. ▪ Differentiated products: All goods are not homogeneous, but are close substitutes of each other and part of a ‘product group’. In this case differentiation on the basis of taste of the food, décor of the restaurant and the service level offered. ▪ Easy of entry and exit: Firms can enter and exit an industry without much costs; there are no legal restrictions. Firms are able to introduce new products in terms of new food items, a new menu. Clearly there is no barrier...

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Market Structures

...Market Structures Adam Timothy Rider ECO204: Principles of Microeconomics Evelyn Carlson 10/13/2014 When trying to gain insight into the local economy it is very important to understand the big picture of how the various market structures relate to each other. This can be accomplished by putting together some of the smaller pieces or characteristic of the market structure. These characteristics can be organizational, competitive or a variety of other features that categorize a firm as a specific market structure. Individual market structures can be described as the amount of firms producing identical goods and services. If you can identify the market structure you can often identify how they firms within the structure are going to price their products in the industry. The market structure will have an effect on the supply and demand of the different commodities in the market. The market structure will also influence barriers for entry and exit in the industry. In order to understand these structures in an economic community you must obtain an understanding of how they all work together to form the economic community. By the end of this report you will possess the necessary knowledge to understand the market structures in the micro economy. Before we begin to the inevitable breakdown of the individual market structures it is important to identify some of the key features of market structure in general. First it would be important to look at......

Words: 2943 - Pages: 12

Game Theory

...Through visionary thought and understanding, a creative strategy increases the outcome of success in a given situation or variable. In many cases, strategy is understood as a plan that chooses an individual’s future possible position. Speaking with respect to Game Theory within the Healthcare field, there are many ways to move forward with creating this ideal insightful approach. Learning through class discussions, it’s clear the topic of the discussion with Game Theory is very evolved, diverse, and dynamic with all different observations. All games share an interdependence meaning the result for each individual is dependent on the option they primarily choose. For myself, this is definitely considered an everyday normalcy working in the Healthcare Industry. Whether Game Theory is applied in all of society is only understood through the participants as all situations are different and unique, but all equally share the mindset of increasing their individual outcome of achievement. The analysis of Game Theory within Healthcare is spread across an increasingly strategy-prone competitive market. Governmental changes alone within healthcare laws create challenges for decision makers to compete within this highly-regulated domain. Creating governmental regulation lessens efficiency for providers who serve society to collaboratively work together, and in addition, diminishes their likelihood of optimal standing within the environment. Turning the hand in reference to my current......

Words: 946 - Pages: 4

Game Theory

...A game is any situation of conflict with at least two players (it may be a person, company). Each side chooses some kind of behavior (strategy) to get the best payoff. Game theory is a way to study conflicts and strategies used to get best results. The decision process is made without full knowledge and that’s what drives people engage into game to strategize to get as good output as possible- perfectly to win everything or at least to lose as little as possible. Game theory as a mix of psychology, mathematics, logic and other academics areas can be useful in several ‘real life’ situations, including negotiations and business. It can be observed in an oligopoly market, when two companies offering a very similar product (for example gas) must find a way to win over their competitors. One can notice parallels in a situation of those companies and classical example of the game theory “prisoner dilemma”. Game theory may also be used in auctions, mergers and acquisitions, bargaining, real estate negotiations, salary negotiations and so on. The most common application of game theory in real life is setting price. Each company wants to set price as high as possible to maximize profit but also wants to win market share as big as possible. Companies can all set the same price for their products and split the profit between themselves or one could try and forecast an advantageous set of lower prices and basically win since their higher market share even at their lower prices......

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Market Structures

...Market Structures Differentiating Between Market Structures The competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi has been around longer than any other beverage in history. I will explain the differences between the two giant's soft drink companies on market structures and their competitive strategies. The impact cola drinks have on consumers within the United States and the rest of the world. Many arguments have started over which is the better product in taste, price, sales, and advertisement. The answers to the questions will never be settled upon, but I will keep a basis opinion since I am big Coca-Cola fan. Oligopoly Coca-Cola and Pepsi are the two dominated beverages in the soft drinks industry. Both soft drink companies has been competing against each other for years. The soft drinks are similar in color and taste that are perfect substitutes for each other. This type of market is considered an Oligopoly market where there are only a few companies that are completive in the market placed. In an oligopolistic market, both firms are dependent on each other for consumer’s profit, but also depend on each other. Coke and Pepsi have always have watched each other during the holidays and summer to compete on prices. The products for both companies fly off the sleeves on great price reduction. Coke reduces their price, Pepsi will reduce the price to stay in the game to make a profit. Even without the price reduction, there some consumers that are...

Words: 1406 - Pages: 6

Game Theory

...Managerial Economics 2010 1. A. Design a simple two-company game that illustrates why it might have been in economic interests of the cigarette companies to support the ban. In designing the game, assume that there is no regulation and that the two firms simultaneously choose between advertising and not advertising. Display your hypothetical payoffs in strategic form (see Figure 9.1) and highlight the Nash equilibrium. Explain the intuition for why the firms in your example would favor regulation to ban advertising. Winston |Advertise |Not Advertise | |fff | | | | | |100/100 |160/60 | | | | | | | | | | |160/60 |150/150 | Profits – Advertising Cost from TV (In millions) Advertise Tareyton Not Advertise During the 1960’s, numerous reports started to surface connecting cancer to smoking...

Words: 2724 - Pages: 11

Game Theory

...Game theory is the method utilized to understand the behavior of oligopolies or market situations in which each of a few producers affects but does not control the market. Unlike monopolies in which a company has complete control of the entire supply of goods and/or services in a certain market, oligopolies do have competitors with in the market. However, unlike monopolistically competitive firms and perfectly competitive firms, firms within a oligopolistic frame work have so few competitors that marketing and pricing decisions made by one firm has a very unique possibility of affecting all the other firms within that market segment. In essence, competitors must take their competitors' possible reactions and responses into account when making decisions. The table below shows the Coke and Pepsi Payoff Matrix with respect to price competition. Both companies have two fundamental strategies: charge an elevated or above market price or a minimal or below market price for its products. Both companies have the possibility of obtaining a big payoff by charging a minimal price while its competitor charges an elevated price, but both companies know that if one of them cuts it price the other will quickly follow suit, resulting in a smaller payoff for both. The resulting equilibrium is both companies charging a high price and engaging instead in non-price competition. Coke vs. Pepsi Payoff Matrix Pepsi charges high price Pepsi charges low price Coke charges high......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Game Theory

...Game Theory Game A game is a formal description of a strategic situation. Game Theory Game theory is the formal study of decision-making where several players must make choices that potentially affect the interests of the other players. Mixed Strategy A mixed strategy is an active randomization, with given probabilities, that determines the player’s decision. As a special case, a mixed strategy can be the deterministic choice of one of the given pure strategies. Nash Equilibrium A Nash equilibrium, also called strategic equilibrium, is a list of strategies, one for each player, which has the property that no player can unilaterally change his strategy and get a better payoff. Pay-Off A payoff is a number, also called utility, that reflects the desirability of an outcome to a player, for whatever reason. When the outcome is random, payoffs are usually weighted with their probabilities. The expected payoff incorporates the player’s attitude towards risk. Perfect information A game has perfect information when at any point in time only one player makes a move, and knows all the actions that have been made until then. Player A player is an agent who makes decisions in a game. Rationality A player is said to be rational if he seeks to play in a manner which maximizes his own payoff. It is often assumed that the rationality of all players is common knowledge. Strategic form A game in strategic form, also called normal form, is a compact representation of a......

Words: 13523 - Pages: 55