Premium Essay

Obscenity In The Udeshi Case Study

Submitted By
Words 1116
Pages 5
Decency or morality is a ground on which freedom of speech and expression may be reasonably restricted. Decency is the same as lack of obscenity. The right to freedom of speech cannot be permitted to deprave and corrupt the community, and therefore, the writings or other objects, if obscene, may be suppressed and punished because such action would be to promote public decency and morality. Thus, obscenity becomes a subject of constitutional interest since it illustrates well the clash between the right of the individual to freely express his opinions and the duty of the State to safeguard morals. Further the scope of obscenity under the existing law is illustrated in Sections 292 to 296 IPC. But obscenity is one of the most obscure and conflicted …show more content…
A Bombay bookseller, the appellant in this case, was prosecuted under Section 292 IPC for selling and keeping for sale the well-known book, Lady Chatterley’s Lover, written by D.H. Lawrence. The Supreme Court after going into the common-law history of the obscenity offence, the Court settled upon Cockburn C.J.’s famous ‘Hicklin Test’ , enunciated in 1868, according to which obscenity is something that would “ ..... deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall .... it is quite certain that it would suggest to the minds of the young of either sex, or even persons of more advanced years, thoughts of a most impure and libidinous …show more content…
Firstly, the courts observed that the works should be considered as a whole and not in individual parts. In Kakodkar case the Supreme Court held that it is the duty of the Court to consider the obscene matter by taking an overall view of the entire work and however obscene the matter may appear to be when considered by itself, the overall literary merit of the book might still make those very passages fall beyond the concept of obscenity. In Abbas case it was held, “it is not the elements of rape, leprosy, sexual immorality which should attract the censor’s scissors but how the theme is handled by the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Mens Rea in Statuory Offences

...Mens Rea in Statutory Offences In the field of law, it is important to understand each and every cause of each and every act. Only then can a sound judgment be given in a case. If the judge does not consider all possible aspects and possibilities, then he will draw the correct legal conclusion most of the times but, not always. One of the most important things to consider with regard to any offence is the mens rea, or the guily intention. This element of crime (mens rea) has been in the picture almost ever since criminal law has been known to exist. It had been incorporated in definitions of crimes as far back as The Code of Hammurabi (1700 B.C.) through the use of words like “intend” and “knowledge”. But, as the years have passed, complexities regarding the use of mens rea have arisen and the courts constantly keep trying to resolve the issues regarding the application of the rule. Generally the question that arises in cases is that whether mens rea is present or absent in the offender. But, sometimes, the question is whether it is required or not. This happens in case of statutory offences. They may expressly or impliedly rule out the requirement of mens rea. The current research study critically analyzes this situation and takes into account the existing views and decisions on the issue. Statutory Offence An offence is basically a violation of law. In legal parlance, the word “offence” is generally construed as a criminal wrong. Hence, offence means a wrong in penal...

Words: 4493 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Legal History

...Bombay High Court 1 1862 - 2012 A Journey of 150 Years through some Memorable Judgments Part 1 2 PREFACE A tiny kernel of an idea planted by Justice Mridula Bhatkar took root, and has resulted in a humble effort to present before you a compendium of the crux of some of the judgments of the Judges who have served the Bombay High Court since its inception in 1862.1 The initial idea was to document one judgment of the First Court from each year which was modified to include a judgment of the Bombay High Court of each year. I soon realized that it was too expansive an idea to merit a single judgment a year. I could collect and collate, as many as ten judgments which would qualify to show the development of the law we desired to portray. Having found too vast a number of such judgments, I had to settle at a more reasonable figure of about five judgments each year to showcase the progress this Court has made from its illustrious beginnings. Our Chief Justice Mohit Shah and our Justice Chandrachud wholeheartedly supported the idea to complement the Book published on this the sesquicentennial of our Court. As the number of Judges grew, fewer judgments of each Judge would be selected as illustrations. These judgments are not the only path-finding groundbreaking ones; they are also ones with simplicity and legal elegance. The number of judgments we settled upon just would not permit all deserving judgments to be compiled; only a few have been picked from each year as the first in...

Words: 139867 - Pages: 560