Free Essay

Procurement Is an Integral Part of Resource-Based View of an Organization

In: Business and Management

Submitted By erilsnow
Words 5448
Pages 22
Procurement is An Integral Part of Resource-­ Based View of An Organization

Phuong Duong

University College Dublin (12251697) 4112 words

ABSTRACT Procurement has become an increasingly widespread practice among organizations and is today of strategic importance that attract great interest from scholars in the literature. The primary purpose of the paper is to contribute with a review of leading studies that analyze procurement from the resource-­‐based view of the organization. The paper begins by setting out the business environment of procurement and then presents the development and propensity of procurement. This is followed by a review of principal works and differences of perspectives of resource-­‐based view. The next section contains an analysis of the relationship between procurement and resource-­‐based theory and discusses empirical works on outsourcing that address outsourcing from the resource-­‐based view. The studies are classified into two categories: those studying the propensity to procure and those studying the relationship between procurement decision and firm’s performance. Finally, some insights are put together to assess the outsourcing decision influenced by resource-­‐based view with the aim of contributing to a better understanding of outsourcing and its role from the perspective of resource-­‐based view of an organization.

1. Procurement and the propensity to procure in modern business context

Procurement, or in other words, “sourcing”, for years has become “a financial material, but strategically peripheral, corporate function” of an organization (Gottfredson et al., 2005). In the literature, procurement becomes a key component and is of major strategic importance to many organizations (Humphreys et al., 1998, Paulraj et al., 2006). Recent decades have witnessed significant changes in macro-­‐economic trends that direct business environment. These changes have been driven by increased globalization, technology innovation, changing consumer behaviours, and consequently, a shift toward procurement and outsourcing (Giunipero et al., 2005, Giunipero et al., 2006, Zheng et al., 2007). Gottfredson et al. (2005) argued that globalization, accompanied by technological advances, is causing the core of competition to change. These days, the ownership of capabilities of an organization is not as important as its ability to govern and take advantage of critical capabilities, whether or not they are the organization’s assets. Procurement is developing so sophisticatedly that even core functions such as engineering, R&D,

manufacturing and marketing can be outsourced. That, according to Gottfredson et al. (2005), in turn, is changing the way the firms think about their organizations, their core values and their competitive abilities. The author also revealed that an emphasis on capability sourcing could result in an organization’s better strategic position by reducing costs, streamlining the company, and enhancing quality. Critical functions provided by more qualified partners usually allow organizations to improve their core capabilities that help them take the lead in their industries.

With the business world changing everyday, the propensity to procure becomes prominent than ever. Nowadays procurement is not only practiced by companies in the technology industries but also spread to multiple businesses such as supply chain, manufacturing, services and so forth. It is recognized that not passive cost-­‐focused, but proactive value-­‐focused procurement strategies are a means of achieving competitive advantage and integral to long-­‐term organizational strategy (Leseure et al., 2005, Mehra and Inman, 2004, Noonan and Wallace, 2004). In a study of the impact of procurement or purchasing on supply integration and performance, Paulraj et al. (2006) also concluded that: (1) a more strategic purchasing function leads to better supply integration; (2) managers must comprehend the importance of purchasing in incorporating buyer-­‐supplier by focusing on “process, relational, information, and cross-­‐ organisational teams”; (3) strategic procurement can create a win-­‐win situation for both buyer and supplier. Taking these into account, it is undeniable that there is a tendency to procure or outsource among organizations.

To assist with procurement decision making, Gottfredson et al. (2005) developed a sourcing opportunities map like Figure 1 to help companies judge the relative merits of their outsourcing possibilities. The vertical dimension of the exhibit “measures how proprietary a process or function is” while the horizontal axis indicates the degree of commonality, both within and outside the company’s industry. The author found that capabilities locating in the upper right portion of the map are potential candidates for procurement.

Once capabilities promising strong candidates for alternative sourcing are discovered, the company needs to figure out how to source them. In this stage, cost and quality requirements should be taken into account to detect key capability gaps to be filled and top-­‐performing competitors or suppliers to partner with. To address these issues, another assessment map has been introduced, again by Gottfredson et al. (2005) as described in the Figure 2 below.

Figure 1

What should you outsource? Source: Adapted from (Gottfredson et al., 2005).

Figure 2

How strong are your capabilities? Source: Adapted from (Gottfredson et al., 2005)

The author explained that the position of capabilities on this grid determinates suitable goals for an outsourcing relationship. Specifically, functions that fall in the upper left should be outsourced to low-­‐cost providers regardless of reduction in quality, while those falling in the lower left require outsourcing partners that can both reduce costs and improve quality.

2. Resource-­based view In the opinion of Mol (2003), resource-­‐based view has today become the domineering perspective of analyzing corporation strategy. However, this concept has been perceived and developed by different scholars in the literature. Porter (1985) suggested a firm’s competitive position can be analyzed by looking at industry structure and the role of internal decision making was overlooked. This theory contradicts itself with earlier strategic management arguments which highlighted both internal and external factors (Skinner, 1969, Ansoff, 1965) and therefore several scholars such as Barney (1991), Amit and Schoemaker (2006), and Peteraf (2006) felt a different perspective and went on developing the resource-­‐based view based on the researches of Coase (1937) and Wernerfelt (1984). In an effort to stress the significance of managerial choice and internal factors, Barney (1991) concluded that the resource-­‐based view “examines the link between a firm’s characteristics and performance” by investigating varied resources within the firm. By the nature of its activities, procurement management is subject to obtaining inputs from outside partners in the organization’s environment (Mol, 2003). According to Wernerfelt (1984), resource-­‐based approach “views the firm as a historically determined collection of assets or resources which are tied semi-­‐ permanently to the firm’s management”. Lockett and Thompson (2001) criticized that resource-­‐based view is sometimes used to distinguish “appropriate resources, such as physical capital or brand names, from less tangible assets, such as organizational routines and capabilities”. Appropriate resources can be seen as assets utilized as appropriate over a specific period, while dynamic resources may lie in capabilities that form additional opportunities over time. The crucial requirements of resource-­‐based view are that relevant resources, regardless of their nature, are specific to the firm and not easy to be imitated by rivals (Barney, 1991). It was noted by Lockett and Thompson (2001) that resource-­‐based view is implied in the sense that each firm’s opportunity set is exclusive and a product of the resources is obtained from its past experience. “Therefore, it follows that decisions about the appropriate boundaries of a firm’s activities should reflect its existing resource bundle. If firms face a similar external environment, in the sense of similar product and factor markets, the resource-­‐based view suggests that those firms with a similar initial resource endowment should display similar ceteris paribus patterns of behavior and performance”.

3. Procurement is an integral part of resource–based view of an organization Procurement and resource-­based view Procurement, or in many context, usually referred to as “outsourcing”, is defined as “ astrategic decision that entails the external contracting of determined non-­‐ strategic activities or business processes necessary for the manufacture of goods or the provision of services by means of agreements or contracts with higher

capability firms to undertake those activities or business processes, with the aim of improving competitive advantage” (Espino Rodriguez and Padron Robaina, 2006). According to resource-­‐based view, resources can be exploited by means of contracts (Barney, 1999, Gainey and Klaas, 2003, Grant, 1991) and this perspective can be used as a framework to help organizations decide which activities should be outsourced and which to perform in-­‐house. In this regard, one of the dominant frameworks that explain the propensity of procurement is core competences approach (Gilley and Rasheed, 2000, Teng et al., 2007). Based on this approach, a firm should invest in activities generating core capabilities and outsource the rest (Prahalad, 1990, Hilmer and Quinn, 1994), regarding that the former activities are those providing the firm’s growth and development (Peteraf, 2006). It is pointed out by Prahalad (1990) that a firm can perform better by focusing on those resources generating the core competences. According to the author, short-­‐term success results from the price and the attributes of the products, while long-­‐term competitive advantages lie on the core capabilities, which derives from the firm’s collective learning. Strategic outsourcing, based on resources and capabilities, signifies a deep understanding of the core competences, which assist organizations to build their long-­‐term competitiveness (Bettis et al., 1992). Espino Rodriguez and Padron Robaina (2006) concluded that the resource based view helps to distinguish the core competences and provides knowledge (Hilmer and Quinn, 1994) about which activities to perform with internal resources and which to procure, “determining that the possession of some resources and capabilities is what defines what the firm itself will do and what it will obtain from third parties”.

In order to explain the integral part that procurement plays from resource-­‐based view, it is important to look into the framework developed by Grant (1991), in which a firm’s resources and capabilities are the main considerations in formulating strategies. In this framework for strategy formulation, five stages were established to associate strategy, competitive advantage and resources and capabilities. Among these five stages, the last one refers to “identifying the resource gaps which need to be filled and invest in replenishing, augmenting and upgrading the firm’s resource base” where there is a place for procurement. This is demonstrated in Figure 3 as below. Grant (1991) believes that regarding the lack of firm’s resources and capabilities, the firm needs to decide between developing resources in-­‐house and outsourcing resources from the third parties. Hence, in order to control the firm’s resources and capabilities and to develop a strategy that improves competitive position, it is essential to acquire complementary resources externally, and therefore an organization should not be limited to exploiting its own stock of resources and capabilities (Teng et al., 2007). In fact, any lack of resources can be supplemented by procurement or strategic alliances, and outsourcing is one way of enriching the firm’s resources and capabilities by helping to improve the organization’s strategy to take better advantage of its capabilities when dealing with external opportunities. Following Grant’s (1991) framework, prior to the decision making process about procurement, the firm must assess the resources that sustain the organization’s activities. It is stated by Cheon et al. (1995) that a firm’s resources may vary, depending on their attributes (valuable, rare, inimitable and non-­‐substitutable) as well as the

quantity of resources allocated to the business process. In particular, organizations outsource what they lack competences and develop internally what they do better than the suppliers, with the result of efficient production (Argyres, 1996). This leads to conclusion of Teng et al. (1995) that the discrepancies in the perceptions of the outcomes (cost, quality of activity and financial performance) are positively related to the propensity to outsource.

Figure 3

A resource-­based approach to outsourcing strategy. Source: Adapted from Grant (1991, 115).

The resource-­‐based view of the firm is based on an assumption of the inside-­‐out perspective, which is described by Prahalad (1990) as “a perspective that builds on an assumption that organisations should clarify the availability of internal resources before they seek outside the organization after resources”. This is in accordance with the conventional approach on the resource-­‐based view of the firm, which views organizations as a collection of productive resources. A major distinction in the theory is that a resource provides organizations with sustained competitive advantage, and to accomplish that, the firm need to fulfill different attributes for the resources. Hedman (2002) found that there are many resource attributes described in the resource-­‐based theory literature that gives a firm its competitive advantage. Four attributes were identified by Barney (1991), Cheon et al. (1995) and Hedman & Kalling (2002) are: valuable, rare, costly to imitate and efficiently organized. Barney (1991) also distinguishes between three various groups of resources: physical capital resources, human capital resources and organizational capital resources. Hedman & Kalling (2002) suggest that the core issue in resource-­‐based theory is how to identify and utilize existing resources more effectively in the organization. The authors came to a conclusion

that if a resource is seen as a necessary for the organization’s competitive advantage, it should be handled internally.

Considering the fact that procurement or outsourcing is a strategic decision (Venkatesan, 1992, Quinn et al., 1990, Hilmer and Quinn, 1994), it is necessary for organizations to assess the strategic potential of its activities. Thus, according to the resource and capability approach, the willingness to outsource an activity depends on the extent to which outsourcing leads to competitive advantage. Espino-­‐Rodriguez and Padron-­‐Robaina (2005) used Cox's (1996) classification of resource specificity to divide activities into three strategic-­‐value groups by type of contractual relationship as in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Strategic value and contractual relationships. Source: Adapted from Cox (1996).

According to the resource-­‐based view of the firm, the organization’s ultimate goal is to achieve competitive advantage by obtaining resources and defending competitive positions (Wernerfelt, 1984, Barney, 1991, Conner, 1991). It is found out by Day and Wensley (1988) that superior resources and capabilities are influenced by specific strategic choices, “including objectives, the quality of tactical decisions and the implementation of those strategies”. Therefore, procurement as a strategic choice can lead to superior resources and capabilities becoming positional advantages, which in turn leads to better company’s performance. A firm’s resources and capabilities should focus on its core competences as well as on the efficient allocation of its resources, and outsource only those activities, which do not depend on strategic resources. This way the firm’s competitive advantage can be maintained.

The resource-­‐based view suggests that the primary focus of any strategy is to improve the value-­‐creation potential of firm resources (Wernerfelt, 1984). This is based on certain conditions, such as resource attributes and their availability

(Barney, 1991). The firm’s resources are classified by Barney (1991) into three categories. First, “there are physical capital resources that include technology, plant and equipment, location, access to raw materials, and related physical resources (Williamson, 1975). Second, the firm requires “human capital resources that include training, expertise, judgment, intelligence, relationships, and insights and knowledge of the members of the workforce” (Javalgi et al., 2009). Third, there are organizational/social resources “that include reporting structures, formal and informal planning processes, administrative and management systems, and informal relationships among groups within the firm and between a firm and its environment” (Tomer, 1987). In addition, the firm also has financial capital resources (Hayes and Abernathy, 1980, Rumelt, 1991), particularly the firm’s debt and equity structures and cost of capital providing advantages. The resource-­‐based view for procurement, as Javalgi et al. (2009) stated, provides a framework for examining the pool of resources and capabilities that may or may not be able to carry out a given strategy during the formulation stage.

Review and classification of the principal studies of procurement/ outsourcing from resource-­based view After an exhaustive view of the literature on procurement/outsourcing from the resource-­‐based view, Espino Rodriguez and Padron Robaina (2006) have classified the reviewed works into two categories according to their objectives: works that study the tendency to procure and works that study the relationship between the decision to procure and organizational performance. The authors of the works in the first group analyze the level of outsourcing according to moderating variables such as the type of resource, environment, strategic orientation, suppliers’ capabilities (Argyres, 1996; Klaas et al., 2001; Leiblein and Miller, 2003; Hilmer and Quinn, 1994). Argyre (1996) states that firms have a propensity to procure when the suppliers have superior capability and the firm does not accept the short-­‐term cost of internal development with the aim of developing the necessary capabilities in-­‐house. In another conceptual work, Quin and Hilmer (1004) suggests core activities be developed internally and procurement be practiced with other strategic objectives to aim at reducing the vulnerability of the firm. Klaas et al. (2001) conducted a most complete study of the procurement of human resources with specific variables of human resources management such as strategic involvement, significance of human resources, salary scale and promotion opportunities. Meanwhile, the later study group use specific assets and other resource-­‐based view related variables to assess the relationship between procurement/outsourcing and the performance of the organization (Gilley and Rasheed, 2000, Klaas et al., 2001, Murray et al., 1995, Teng et al., 2007). Gilley and Rasheed (2000) uses competitive strategy as moderating variable to analyze the effect of outsourcing and they come to a conclusion that the good effect is made in the case of a cost leadership strategy and a differentiation strategy causes negative impact. On the other hand, Murray et al (1995) study a negative relationship between outsourcing and organizational performance as the asset specificity and innovations in products and processes increase. Teng et al (1995) states that the discrepancies in the

perceptions of the outcomes such as cost, the quality of the activity and financial performance makes a positive impact on the tendency to outsource. Moreover, these authors differentiate core outsourcing from peripheral outsourcing, based on how important executives considers the principal activities are for increased sales and profitability. The study of Klaas et al. (2001) is one of studies in this group, as it assesses the relationship between human resources performance and outsourcing and identifies a negative relationship only for some of the human resources functions.

Barney (1991), Grant (1991) and Peteraf (1993) are one of the first resource-­‐ based theorists that offer a general model of resources and performance from an integrating perspective. According to the analysis of Collis and Montgomery, (1995), owning valuable resources can generate competitive advantages for the firm so that it performs activities better or at lower cost than their competitors. Barney (1991) thought that in order to have that potential, a resource must meet four conditions: “it must be (1) valuable, (2) rare, (3) imperfectly imitable and (4) non-­‐substitutable. Sharing the same idea, Grant (1991) states that core competences of a firm are those valuable resources and capabilities “that are difficult to identify and understand, imperfectly transferable, not easily replicated and over which the firm possesses clear ownership and control”. It is agreed among Barney (1991), Grant (1991) and Peteraf (1993) that heterogeneity plays the key role in the achievement of competitive advantages and to ensure the sustainability of that competitive position, such heterogeneity must be continuous and prevent competitors from being able to imitating or substitute the resources that form competitive differential. Espino Rodriguez and Padron Robaina (2006) also developed a framework that relates outsourcing with the characteristics of the resources and their impact on performance as in Figure 5. This framework shoes that the outsourcing of services or business processes is based on the strategic value of the resources forming them. The strategic value is constituted by “the heterogeneity of the resources (valuable, specific), and the persistence of that heterogeneity (non-­‐substitutable, inimitable and the appropriability of the rents)”. Additionally, the framework analyze the relationship between outsourcing and organizational performance based on the type of activity to be outsources and concludes that to improve organizational performance and to develop capabilities across organizational boundaries, it is required for the relationship between the organization and the supplier “to convert into invisible assets (Itami, 1987) and capabilities with their own significance that generate inimitable inter-­‐organizational routines.

Figure 5

Outsourcing framework based on the RBV. Source: Adopted from Espino-­Rodriguez & Padron Robaina (2006).

How resource-­based view informs outsourcing evaluation of the firm The resource-­‐based view is critical to the study of procurement/outsourcing, as superior performance achieved in organizational activities compared to competitors would explain why such activities are performed in-­‐house. McIvor (2009) figures out that a major concern of the resource-­‐based view is how an organization’s capabilities develop and influence its competitive differential and performance. The argument of Langlois and Robertson (1995) is that firm boundaries can be identified by comparing internal competences with the competences of competitors. The outsourcing decision, hence, is affected by the ability of a firm to invest in developing a capability and maintaining a superior performance position in activities relative to competitors. Activities in which the firm lacks internal resources or capabilities can be outsourced and through that, firms can achieve complementary capabilities from external parties where they can gain no advantage from performing such activities in-­‐house. Focusing on and developing certain capabilities is critical to the resource-­‐based view, which in return has important implications for which activities to perform internally and which to outsource. The resource based view, according to McIvor (2009), therefore can assist with identifying organizational capabilities, which can link outsourcing or procurement with performance and the competitive priorities of the organization. The following classification of capabilities and outsourcing decision is also based on perspective of this author.

Critical to competitive advantage and a distinctive capability position A firm would wish to have superior performance in as many core activities as possible, however, due to the resources required, it is only feasible to achieve advantaging positions in a limited number of activities. Under certain circumstances, any superior performance position that a firm currently possesses is not long-­‐lasting and can be quickly replicated. In addition, it is probably safer to focus on other activities in which the organization owns a stronger performance advantages, and which are more important to competitive

position in long term. Thus, when outsourcing is seen as a potential sourcing strategy, the firm should consider the opportunism associated with outsourcing measure (McIvor, 2009).

Critical to competitive advantage and a non-­distinctive capability position According to McInvor (2009), this is a potential strategy where replicating a superior performance position held by a competitor of supplier is both challenging and costly. Barney (1995) thought that changes in the business environment such as technology advances or changes in customers’ preferences may render the activity less valuable in the future. This is in line with the concept of dysfunctional resources. “Resources that have created value in the past can become dysfunctional, i.e. they prevent change and lead to a lack of innovation capability”. These resources are referred to by Leonard-­‐Barton (1992) as “core rigidities”. McInvor (2009) agreed that where outsourcing is considered as a potential option, the firm should consider the opportunism associated with outsourcing measure.

Not critical to competitive advantage and a distinctive capability position In this instance, the sourcing organization has more advantages over competitors or suppliers in an activity that is not central to competitive advantage. Hence, employing the logic of the resource-­‐based view, McInvor (2009) concluded that the organization should consider outsourcing such an activity, and focus resources on developing capabilities in activities that are more significant to organizational success. The organization may exploit capability in this area by creating “a spin-­‐off business”, which specializes in this area of activities. The success of a spin-­‐off business will rely on the ability “to attract a significant percentage of sales from third-­‐party customers, rather than sales primarily from the founding customer. Nevertheless, where there is a lack of potential to develop this area as a separate business, the firm should consider the opportunism of outsourcing.

Not critical to competitive advantage and a non-­ distinctive capability position In this context, when there are competitors or suppliers that are more competent than sourcing organization for an activity not central to competitive advantage, adhering to the logic of resource-­‐based theory, such as activities should be outsourced. In short, where outsourcing is regarded as the most suitable strategy, the firm should consider the opportunism associated with outsourcing measure.

Opportunism associated with outsourcing As analyzed above, where outsourcing is a potential strategy, McInvor (2009) suggests that the firm should undertake an assessment of the opportunism associated with outsourcing measure. The author found that there are three

scenarios that an organization will be faced with. The first scenario is that opportunism associated with outsourcing is manageable by selecting a suitable relationship strategy. In this instance, the decision depends on each type of strategies: non-­‐specific contracting, recurrent contracting and relational contracting. While it is not possible to manage outsourcing via selecting an appropriate relationship strategy, the firm is recommended to reduce the potential for opportunism. In cases that this practice cannot be performed, it is advisable that the sourcing organization will perform the activity in-­‐house.

CONCLUSIONS This work involved a review of principal contributions in the field of procurement or outsourcing from the resource-­‐based view of an organization. The paper begins by presenting the definition of procurement and the propensity to procure in modern business environment and then discusses the development of resource-­‐based view in the literature. Then, it analyzes the relationship between procurement and resource-­‐based view, looks into major studies of procurement or outsourcing from the perspective of resource-­‐based theory and finally assesses how the theory informs outsourcing evaluation of an organization. It may be concluded from this paper that the empirical application of the resource-­‐based view to outsourcing derives from early days and the complexity of considering aspects still remain. The findings have highlighted the importance of procurement in the context of resource-­‐based view of an organization. The theory views the firm as a bundle of assets and resources that if employed in distinctive ways can create competitive advantage (Peteraf, 1993; Barney, 1991). The core competence evolved from resource-­‐based view has been extremely influential in outsourcing practice, with the distinction core and non-­‐ core business firmly influencing many practitioners.

REFERENCES AMIT, R. & SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H. (2006) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic management journal, 14, 33-­‐46. ANSOFF, H. I. (1965) Corporate Strategy, McGraw-­‐Hill, New York. ARGYRES, N. (1996) Evidence on the role of firm capabilities in vertical integration decisions. Strategic management journal, 17, 129-­‐150. BARNEY, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Jounal of Management, 17, 99-­‐120. BARNEY, J. B. (1999) How a firm's capabilities affect boundary decisions. Sloan Management Review, 40, 137-­‐145. BETTIS, R. A., BRADLEY, S. P. & HAMEL, G. (1992) Outsourcing and industrial decline. The Executive, 6, 7-­‐22. CHEON, M. J., GROVER, V. & TENG, J. T. C. (1995) Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems. Journal of information Technology, 10, 209-­‐219. COASE, R. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, 386-­‐405.

COLLIS, D. J. & MONTGOMERY, C. A. (1995) Competing on resources. harvard business review, 73, 118-­‐128. CONNER, K. R. (1991) A historical comparison of resource-­‐based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17, 121-­‐154. COX, A. (1996) Relational competence and strategic procurement management: towards an entrepreneurial and contractual theory of the firm. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 2, 57-­‐70. DAY, G. S. & WENSLEY, R. (1988) Assessing advantage: a framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. The Journal of Marketing, 1-­‐20. ESPINO RODRIGUEZ, T. F. & PADRON ROBAINA, V. (2006) A review of outsourcing from the resource based view of the firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8, 49-­‐70. ESPINO-­‐RODRIGUEZ, T. F. & PADRON-­‐ROBAINA, V. (2005) A resource-­‐based view of outsourcing and its implications for organizational performance in the hotel sector. Tourism Management, 26, 707-­‐721. GAINEY, T. W. & KLAAS, B. S. (2003) The outsourcing of training and development: Factors impacting client satisfaction. Journal of Management, 29, 207-­‐229. GILLEY, K. M. & RASHEED, A. (2000) Making more by doing less: an analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, 26, 763-­‐790. GIUNIPERO, L., HANDFIELD, R. B. & ELTANTAWY, R. (2006) Supply management's evolution: key skill sets for the supply manager of the future. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 822-­‐844. GIUNIPERO, L. C., DENSLOW, D. & ELTANTAWY, R. (2005) Purchasing/supply chain management flexibility: moving to an entrepreneurial skill set. Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 602-­‐613. GOTTFREDSON, M., PURYEAR, R. & PHILLIPS, S. (2005) Strategic sourcing. Harvard Business Review, 83, 132-­‐139. GRANT, R. M. (1991) The resource-­‐based theory of competitive advantage. California Management Review, 114-­‐135. HAYES, R. H. & ABERNATHY, W. J. (1980) Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Bus. Rev.;(United States), 58. HEDMAN, J. K., T. (2002) IT and Business Models, Concepts and Theories, Liber Ekonomi, Malmo. HILMER, F. & QUINN, J. (1994) Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35, 43-­‐55. HUMPHREYS, P., MCIVOR, R. & MCALEER, E. (1998) The purchasing function as a professional service firm: implications for training and development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 22, 3-­‐11. ITAMI, H. (1987) Mobilizing invisible assets. JAVALGI, R. R. G., DIXIT, A. & SCHERER, R. F. (2009) Outsourcing to emerging markets: Theoretical perspectives and policy implications. Journal of International Management, 15, 156-­‐168. KLAAS, B. S., MCCLENDON, J. A. & GAINEY, T. W. (2001) Outsourcing HR: The impact of organizational characteristics. Human Resource Management, 40, 125-­‐138.

LANGLOIS, R. N. & ROBERTSON, P. L. (1995) Firms, markets and economic change: a dynamic theory of business institutions, Routledge London. LEIBLEIN, M. J. & MILLER, D. J. (2003) An empirical examination of transaction‚Äêand firm‚Äêlevel influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic management journal, 24, 839-­‐859. LEONARD-­‐BARTON, D. (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13, 111-­‐125. LESEURE, M. J., BAUER, J., BIRDI, K., NEELY, A. & DENYER, D. (2005) Adoption of promising practices: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5, 169-­‐190. LOCKETT, A. & THOMPSON, S. (2001) The resource-­‐based view and economics. Journal of Management, 27, 723-­‐754. MCIVOR, R. (2009) How the transaction cost and resource-­‐based theories of the firm inform outsourcing evaluation. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 45-­‐63. MEHRA, S. & INMAN, R. A. (2004) Purchasing management and business competitiveness in the coming decade. Production Planning & Control, 15, 710-­‐718. MOL, M. J. (2003) Purchasing's strategic relevance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9, 43-­‐50. MURRAY, J. Y., KOTABE, M. & WILDT, A. R. (1995) Strategic and financial performance implications of global sourcing strategy: A contingency analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 181-­‐202. NOONAN, J. & WALLACE, M. (2004) Building responsive contract manufacturers through value-­‐focused strategies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 295-­‐302. PAULRAJ, A., CHEN, I. J. & FLYNN, J. (2006) Levels of strategic purchasing: Impact on supply integration and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12, 107-­‐122. PETERAF, M. A. (2006) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-­‐ based view. Strategic management journal, 14, 179-­‐191. PORTER, M. E. (1985) Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press. PRAHALAD, C. K. A. H., G. (1990) The Core of Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review May-­‐June 1990, 79-­‐91. QUINN, J. B., DOORLEY, T. L. & PAQUETTE, P. C. (1990) Technology in services: rethinking strategic focus. Sloan Management Review, 31, 79-­‐87. RUMELT, R. P. (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic management journal, 12, 167-­‐185. SKINNER, W. (1969) Manufacturing-­missing link in corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review. TENG, J. T. C., CHEON, M. J. & GROVER, V. (2007) Decisions to Outsource Information Systems Functions: Testing a Strategy‚ÄêTheoretic Discrepancy Model. Decision Sciences, 26, 75-­‐103. TOMER, J. F. (1987) Productivity through intra-­‐firm cooperation: A behavioral economic analysis. Journal of Behavioral Economics. VENKATESAN, R. (1992) Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make. Harvard Business Review, 70, 98-­‐98.

WERNERFELT, B. (1984) A resource-­‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5, 171-­‐180. WILLIAMSON, O. (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. University of Illinois at Urbana-­Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. ZHENG, J., KNIGHT, L., HARLAND, C., HUMBY, S. & JAMES, K. (2007) An analysis of research into the future of purchasing and supply management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13, 69-­‐83.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Key Drivers That Move an Organisation Towards Implementing an Integrated Supply Chain

...drivers that are moves an organization towards implementing an integrated supply chain. Integration: This era of supply chain management studies was highlighted with the development of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) systems in the 1960s and developed through the 1990s by the introduction of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. This era has continued to develop into the 21st century with the expansion of internet-based collaborative systems. This era of supply chain evolution is characterized by both increasing value-adding and cost reductions through integration. By developing cross-functional integration, supported by data warehousing and shared roles and responsibilities, organizations began to create a customized view of the customer. Support issues, Web hits, sales calls and marketing inquiries started building a deeper understanding of each customer and allowed aggressive organizations to adapt their tactics to fit individual needs. a) Customer service management process Customer Relationship Management concerns the relationship between the organization and its customers. Customer service is the source of customer information. It also provides the customer with real-time information on scheduling and product availability through interfaces with the company's production and distribution operations. Successful organizations use the following steps to build customer relationships:  determine mutually satisfying goals for organization and......

Words: 1216 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Procurement New Operating Model

...Booz & Company INtrOductION By now, most companies have ridden one or more strategic sourcing waves that have collectively saved their organizations billions of dollars. Yet even after having benefited from these initiatives, the average company still leaves on the table unrealized savings equaling 5 to 10 percent of its total spending. These savings are not lost because of ill-conceived strategies or organizational incompetence; rather, their loss is inherent in flawed or incomplete procurement operating models. There are many reasons that the operating models constructed to procure and pay for goods and services prove inadequate. They may not include the processes, tools, or resources needed to fully execute the sourcing strategy. They may not be properly connected to organizational decision making or sufficiently integrated into key corporate planning processes. Decisionmaking authority and accountability may not be clearly defined. Or the IT systems that enable them may be fragmented, impeding efficiency and clouding the visibility necessary to ensure compliance with overall purchasing policies and objectives. In order to mitigate these problems and deliver on purchasing’s cost, quality, and service commitments, companies must evaluate and design their procurement operating models along four fundamental dimensions: organization, processes, technology, and performance management (see Exhibit 1, page 2). Together, these four elements determine an operating model’s......

Words: 2764 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay


... | | |Information Systems Risk Management | Copyright © 2010, 2009, 2008, 2006 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. Course Description This course identifies and defines the types of risks that information systems professionals need to consider during the development and implementation of computer based information systems. This course will survey remedies and prevention techniques available to address the risk areas present. Organizational policies and current regulatory considerations will also be examined relative to development, implementation, and use of computer based information systems. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies at the beginning of each class. Policies may be slightly different depending on the modality in which you attend class. If you have recently changed modalities, read the policies governing your current class modality. Course Materials Cooper, D. F., Grey, S., Raymond, G., & Walker, P. (2005). Project...

Words: 1982 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Human Resource Management

...Human Resource Management Submitted by: Amandeep Kaur Contribution of Human Resource Management in achievement of organisational objectives Human Resource Management seeks to achieve - Individual, Social Organizational Goals: Organization is a social unit that is composed of number of people and function through people only. All the resources such as men, money, materials and machinery are collected, co-ordinate and fictionalized by the people. Without human efforts, no organization can achieve its goals. Therefore, this resource is called human resource, which is the most significant resource of any organization. We also consider that human resource become unending source of ability, power, skill, efficiency, knowledge, creativity for accomplishment of organizational objectives and also play crucial role in management process. These days, organizations have realized that the most valuable asset in the organization is its people. The growth of an organization depends on talent of its human assets as people act as change agents for the implementation of any initiatives in an organization.(Baptiste, 2004) Human resource management is a set of policies, practices and programs formulated to achieve both personal and organizational goals as it is the process of binding people and organizations together. According to Flippo, Human Resource Management “the planning, organizing, directing and controlling of the various aspect of human......

Words: 3743 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Professional Ethics

...VICKY_BUISS@YAHOO.COM LEARNING CENTRE : PPNS ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN MANAGEMENT “A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world” Albert Camus “Ethics is the activity of man directed to secure the inner perfection of his own personality” Albert Schweitzer INTRODUCTION 1. General. Management in general is a command function that requires detail and in depth research, planning, coordination, validation and implementation to ensure the desired Vision, Mission and Objectives of an organization is achieved both effectively and collectively. Therefore, management is an important tool towards the success and sustainability of any organization. As such, the need to have a clear understanding on the true meaning of management and other related subject matters in relation to this paper is as follows: a. Management. ‘Management’, generally means the act of getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives using available resources efficiently and effectively. Management in its broad sense comprises of planning, organizing, staffing, leading or directing and controlling. b. Ethics. ‘Ethics’ also known as ‘Moral Philosophy’ can be defined as the principles of morally acceptable conduct of individuals. Ethics also means an individual’s personal beliefs about right and wrong behaviors. It is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior of individuals and......

Words: 3240 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Effects of Poor Quality Goods and Services Procured by Govenrment Agencies on Service Delivery; a Case Study of the Ministry of Health Kericho District Hospital

...AWARD OF A DEGREE IN BACHELOR OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MARKETING MANAGEMENT OPTION FEBRUARY 2014 DECLARATION DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE This research study is my original work and it has not been presented to any other Institution. No part of this research should be reproduced without my consent or that of Moi University SIGN: ______________________DATE: ____________________ CHERUIYOT KIPYEGON BEN BBM/3111/12 DECLARATION BY THE SUPERVISOR This Research has been submitted with my approval to Moi University as the candidate’s research proposal supervisor. SIGN: _______________________DATE: ____________________ MR. J. OMANGA SUPERVISOR - RESEARCH PROPOSAL DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my family for their unwavering support that saw me complete the research project, more so to my Sisters Florence for ensuring that my study was a success and Lily for proof reading this research proposal. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to thank my Supervisor Mr. James Omanga for his guidance and reviewing my research proposal, the Kericho District Hospital management for allowing me to carry out my research in the organization. Appreciation to all my family members for the understanding and support they gave and continue to give me during my study period, for their encouragements and patience. Gracious thanks to Kericho District Hospital fraternity who agreed to avail the...

Words: 6786 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay


...Total Customer Satisfaction Depends on Supplier Performance Strategic Sourcing • Strategic sourcing: the development and management of supplier relationships to acquire goods and services in a way that aids in achieving the immediate needs of the business • In the past, sourcing was another name for purchasing • As a result of globalization, sourcing implies a more complex process suitable for products that are strategically important The Sourcing/Purchasing Design Matrix Strategic Sourcing Continued • A request for proposal (RFP) is used for purchasing items that are more complex or expensive and where there may be a number of potential vendors • Vendor managed inventory: when a customer actually allows the supplier to manage an item or group of items for them What is Outsourcing? • Outsourcing: the act of moving a firm’s internal activities and decision responsibility to outside providers • Allows a company to create a competitive advantage while reducing cost • An entire function may be outsourced, or some elements of an activity may be outsourced, with the rest kept in-house Reasons to Outsource and the Resulting Benefits Drawbacks of Outsourcing • • • • • Layoff Hired back wages and benefits reduced Bypassing union contracts Noncore activities may become core Loss of competitive knowledge A Framework for Structuring Supplier Relationships Outlet: 10/F, World Interest Building, Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Tel: 22701263, make a phone call B4......

Words: 2091 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Procurement in Oil and Gas Industry in Developing Countries Nigeria Agip

...Procurement in Oil and Gas Industry in Developing Countries A Case of AGIP Nigeria Name Course Professor Date Abstract This is a thesis about procurement process in the oil and gas industry in Nigeria with specific stress on AGIP Nigerian AGIP Energy and Natural Resource.” The report starts with an introduction to the country Nigeria itself. It develops with the research on the oil and gas sector in the country and then focuses on the AGIP and its operations. Thus the first section comprises the Introduction, the background of the problem the research objectives, literature review regarding the procurement process and the company AGIP. The second section is about the research methodology, the data analysis and presentation of results leading to limitations and recommendations and a conclusion. A qualitative research design has been used to do the research. These research methods have been used by every researcher in a way or other and quality data has been accumulated to help these researchers to prove their viewpoint either statistically (quantitative) or by subjective analysis of earlier researches or direct observations of the subjects (qualitatively). The data sources used for the literature review for this study are primarily the secondary sources particularly from books, journals, articles published in various scientific periodicals and / or newspapers along with the information gathered from the internet itself using its websites.  The study manoeuvres at two......

Words: 12215 - Pages: 49

Premium Essay


...Course/Unit Information | Course | Postgraduate Diploma in Supply Chain Management and Logistics. | Awarding Body | The Association of Business Practitioners | Batch | SCML - 1406 | Instructor Information | Name | LeenaWanganoo | Phone | +971501139849 | Skype | | Email | | Assignment Information | Full/ Part Assignment | Part – Task 1( LO1, LO2) | Date Assignment Issued | 4.07.2014 | Date Assignment Due | 25.07.2014 | Student Information(To be filled by the student prior submitting the assignment) | Name | Siji Sundaran Manalikkattil | Email | | Date of Submission | 19th July 2014 | Student Assignment covering form is an integral part of the assignment document and should be submitted along with all submissions. Student Declaration I, Siji Sundaran Manalikkattil hereby confirm that this assignment is my own work and not copied or plagiarized. It has not previously been submitted as part of any assessment for this qualification. All the sources, from which information has been obtained for this assignment, have been referenced as per Harvard Referencing format. I further confirm that I have read and understood the Westford School of Management rules and regulations about plagiarism and copying and agree to be bound by them. Students Signature : Siji Student Name : Siji Sundaran Manalikkattil Date : 19th July 2014 Learning Outcomes and......

Words: 5507 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Final Design Logistic Pgn

...PT. Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) Tbk Final Design Stage Report ‘Logistics Transformation’ 12th February 2011 © Copyright 2011 A.T. Kearney, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form without written permission from A.T. Kearney Diagnostic Summary: Strategy, Organization and Procurement Process are the key areas that should be addressed on a higher priority High priority areas 1 Logistics strategy: Focuses mainly on execution and cost reduction by meeting its SLAs and KPIs – limited value-add. Need a comprehensive strategy / roadmap Other areas 4 Supplier management: No established preferred supplier list leading to long lead time. Lack of supplier evaluation leading to lower quality 2 Logistics organization: Decentralized organisation with limited oversight from HO ~20% spend influence. Limited volume pooling and cost savings. 5 Procurement Strategy Procurement Organization Strategic Sourcing Operating process management Supplier Relationship Management Material management: Formal planning and communication could be improved. Lack of material categorisation to determine category level storage strategy 3 Strategic sourcing / Operating process: High time requirements, leading to suboptimal budget realization (80% PGN source-able(1) spend, compared to ~20% currently 1 Strategic Sourcing & Category Mgmt 1 Strategic Sourcing • Conduct strategic sourcing activity for center led categories 0 ...

Words: 23658 - Pages: 95

Premium Essay

Manpower Planning

...Manpower Planning Manpower planning is a process by which the management ensures the right number and the right kind of people are at the right place and are doing the desired things(for which they are best suited) for the achievement of organisational objectives. It is the process of developing and determining objectives, policies of procurement in relation to manpower. It requires forecasting manpower needs and planning of activities to fulfil those forecast needs. . It involves anticipating the present and future requirements of the number and quality of work force in the organisation. It has two main aspects:- Quantitative Aspect It involves determination of the number of personnel required by the organisation. The number of employees is determined on the basis of work-load analysis and work-force analysis. Work-load analysis is based on production and sales budgets, time study and work scheduling. Work-force analysis is an analysis of the present manpower and its future potential. Qualitative Aspect It is concerned with the determination of the type of manpower required. The quality of manpower depends upon the requirements of the job, which in turn can be determined with the help of job analysis. Job analysis is a detailed and systematic study of the job to find out the nature and qualifications of the people required for efficient performance of the job. Job analysis reveals the tasks which constitute the job, the skills and knowledge required for the......

Words: 1678 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Hr Practice in Equity Property Management Ltd

...experience. I have completed my MBA from Chittagong University however my streams were Human Resource Management, I have done my internship Report on HR practices in Equity Property Management Ltd.and tried to find out its performance and Projection. Rationale of the Report The internship program is aimed to give the MBA students convenient point of reference where they can apply their traditional hypothetical knowledge. As professional degree holders under the Business Faculty, MBA students are the future managers of the organizations. A MBA graduate student also requires that they get exposure to International & Marketing aspects. Accordingly, I have chosen a local company, EPML on behalf of my internship report, which is one of the leading developers in Bangladesh. I consider myself very lucky to work in HR & Admin Department of such a large company where I got the exposure to competitive–level standards of HR activities in a highly competitive and dynamic business atmosphere. My internship report is based on the experiences as well as learning’s that I have gathered through working with this organization. Objective of the Report ✓ To have a clear picture of the basic HR functions. ✓ To describe the clear picture of HR practices in Equity Property Management Ltd. ✓ To analyze the performance and the HR activities. ✓ To know about the strategic Human Resource Management. ✓ To know about the ISO manuals Methodology & Data......

Words: 9304 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Literature Review of Supply Chin Management

...Literature review The concept of Supply Chain Management is based on two core ideas. The first is that practically every product that reaches an end user represents the cumulative effort of multiple organizations. These organizations are referred to collectively as the supply chain. The second idea is that while supply chains have existed for a long time, most organizations have only paid attention to what was happening within their “four walls.” Few businesses understood, much less managed, the entire chain of activities that ultimately delivered products to the final customer. The result was disjointed and often ineffective supply chains. Supply chain management, then, is the active management of supply chain activities to maximize customer value and achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. It represents a conscious effort by the supply chain firms to develop and run supply chains in the most effective & efficient ways possible. Supply chain activities cover everything from product development, sourcing, production, and logistics, as well as the information systems needed to coordinate these activities. The organizations that make up the supply chain are “linked” together through physical flows and information flows. Physical flows involve the transformation, movement, and storage of goods and materials. They are the most visible piece of the supply chain. But just as important are information flows. Information flows allow the various supply chain partners to......

Words: 2346 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Chief Mr.

...The Change Plan PROPOSALS BY THE CHANGE MANAGEMENT TEAM TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL United Nations NEW YORK, DECEMBER 2011 The Change Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................ 01 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 02 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 09 3. Context ................................................................................................................................................... 10 4. The Secretary-General’s Vision ................................................................................................................ 12 5. Deliverable One – Enhancing Trust and Confidence: Towards a more stakeholder and client-oriented organizational culture ............................................................................................. 13 6. Deliverable Two – Engaging Staff: A global, dynamic, adaptable, meritocratic and physically secure work force. .......................................................................................................... 19 7. Deliverable Three – Improving Working Methods: A more open and accountable UN with streamlined procedures...

Words: 35902 - Pages: 144

Premium Essay

Walmart Organizational Management

...Walmart Organizational Management Name Institution Affiliation Organizational Context Wal-Mart Stores Inc. or Walmart is a multinational retail organization that has numerous chains of large discount warehouse and general stores. The company was formed in 1962 by Sam Walton as a family-owned business. It was incorporated in 1969 and traded on the Stock Exchange of New York publicly in 1972. Since then this organization has grown strength to strength winning various accolades. In 1988, it was ranked as the most profitable retail business in America outselling competitors such as K-Mart and Sears in the retail business (Fishman, 2006). It was founded on Sam Walton’s quest for providing goods and services at relatively low or discounted prices. The Walmart principles have been hinged on cost-cutting while at the same retailing goods at consumer-friendly prices. The organization too, has been hailed for its global standard efficiency and business innovations. It was one of the first corporations that integrated use of computers in its operations in all its branches. The mission statement reflects on the founder’s business model of passing savings to his clientele and amassing profits through volume sales. This principle has made consumers feel more welcome and their needs taken care of over the years. The cost-cutting initiatives embraced by the company operations have been as a result of this old age philosophy Walmart has spread its wings world over opening up over......

Words: 3464 - Pages: 14