Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Redistricting In Texas

Submitted By
Words 775
Pages 4
Gerrymandering is not a hard task to do. Texas is a merger of Republicans and federal court attainment. Democrats struggle yearly to hold seats in Texas, the essence of the technique is to force voters who are likely to favor your opponents into a few throwaway districts where the other side will win crooked victories. Through artful drawing of district boundaries, it is potential to put large groups of electors on the losing side of every election.
The procedure for making a congressional district map starts out with the Census population data, information collected by the legislatures, because of the State’s population changes that will take place. Redistricting is a process of redrawing election districts and redistributing legislative …show more content…
This elaborate process can strengthen a representatives capable of using high tech computer technology to have the most commendatory district boundaries. During the process of redistricting one party can simply benefit by clouding voters’ minds with ideas of political, cultural, or religious beliefs that would encourage them to agree with representative and stand firm to support it. This can all be done within a single district and or it can also be used within two districts depending on how this is laid out. Redistricting can also create available seats to represent a district, but on the down fall it can also cause conflicts between the same parties disputing in possible competition ensuring that one of them will …show more content…
According to John O’Loughlin “Gerrymandering is defined as biased district lines designed to help a group and hurt its opponents, inevitably, will be the grounds of more legal challenges.” Manipulation has been the leading strategies of electoral districts to show an interest towards a particular group. There are two main strategies taken known as cracking and packing. These same strategies apply to both partisan and racial gerrymandering. When using the “cracking” strategy, it’s when the minority community is fragmented into a few districts, which none of these have a majority of minorities. When going through a racially polarized voting situation, minorities will be unable to elect a candidate of their option to the legislature in any one district around. The “stacking” strategy is when the minority community is concentrated in a smaller number of districts so that their votes are wasted in a district that their preferred candidate will win by an overwhelming

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Redistricting In Texas

...The Texas State Legislature is responsible for controlling redistricting in Texas. After the U.S. Census Bureau sends the data to the state, both houses of legislature present new bills to redraw the congressional and state legislative boundaries. When and if legislature fails to agree on a redistricting plan, the Texas constitution requires a state redistricting board to be formed to finish the plan. Those plans must also be precleared from the U.S. District of Columbia, being consistent with the Voting Rights Act. In 2010, Texas gained four seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in the last round of decennial redistricting. This number made Texas have 36 total seats, more than any other state in the U.S. Arguments of redistricting...

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

History

...THE STRUCTURE OF THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY I.  Intro --Court organization CAN become the focus of political battles.    --e.g.  There are 12 circuit courts (federal courts of appeals).  The 9th circuit is the largest as it includes 9 states and two territories. It stretches from Alaska to Arizona and from Montana to Hawaii and then to Guam. -- 28 full time judges and several more retired judges who help out part time. --Hears over 5000 cases a year. -In 1990 the U.S. Senate considered a bill to split the 9th circuit into 2 circuits. California, Arizona and Nevada would make up one circuit while the other states and territories would make up a second circuit. -to some this division made sense since the circuit was considered too large to handle business efficiently. However, this seemingly routine matter of administration met intense opposition. --The bill was sponsored by Senators from the northwestern states and was opposed by senators from California. Interest groups were also involved:  The Sierra Club and other environmental groups argued fiercely against the proposal. --Why would the division of a judicial circuit into two parts stir up such political controversy?  -->The 9th Circuit had a majority of judges from California which gave broad interpretations to environmental protection laws. --People from the Northwest saw these decisions as damaging to their timber industries. --So splitting the circuit would prevent California judges from ruling on environmental...

Words: 4186 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Asdasdasd

...[pic] FIRST ARMY EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REPRESENTATIVE COURSE STUDENT GUIDE TO CULTURAL AWARENESS INDEX LESSON TITLE PAGE 1 Philosophical Aspects of Culture SG- 3 C1 Native American Experience SG- 4 C2 White American Experience SG- 23 C3 Arab American Experience SG- 43 C4 Hispanic American Experience SG- 53 C5 Black American Experience SG- 76 C6 Asian American Experience SG-109 C7 Jewish American Experience SG-126 C8 Women in the Military SG-150 C9 Extremist Organizations/Gangs SG-167 STUDENTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING FAMILIARIZED WITH ALL CLASS MATERIAL PRIOR TO CLASS. INFORMATION PAPER ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF CULTURAL DIFFERENCE Developed by Edwin J. Nichols, Ph.D. |Ethnic Groups/ |Axiology |Epistemology |Logic |Process | |World Views | | | | | |European |Member-Object |Cognitive |Dichotomous |Technology | |Euro-American |The highest value lies in the object |One knows through counting |Either/Or...

Words: 63019 - Pages: 253

Free Essay

Grammar Worksheet

...GLENCOE LANGUAGE ARTS Grammar and Language Workbook G RADE 9 Glencoe/McGraw-Hill Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Send all inquiries to: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill 936 Eastwind Drive Westerville, Ohio 43081 ISBN 0-02-818294-4 Printed in the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 024 03 02 01 00 99 Contents Handbook of Definitions and Rules .........................1 Troubleshooter ........................................................21 Part 1 Grammar ......................................................45 Unit 1 Parts of Speech 1.1 Nouns: Singular, Plural, and Collective ....47 1.2 Nouns: Proper and Common; Concrete and Abstract.................................49 1.3 Pronouns: Personal and Possessive; Reflexive and Intensive...............................51 1.4 Pronouns: Interrogative and Relative; Demonstrative and Indefinite .....................53 1.5 Verbs: Action (Transitive/Intransitive) ......55 1.6 Verbs: Linking .............................................57 1.7 Verb Phrases ................................................59 1.8 Adjectives ....................................................61 1.9 Adverbs........................................................63 1.10 Prepositions...

Words: 107004 - Pages: 429

Premium Essay

Mister

...Contents Title Page Dedication Prologue CHAPTER ONE: Republicans and Democrats CHAPTER TWO: Values CHAPTER THREE: Our Constitution CHAPTER FOUR: Politics CHAPTER FIVE: Opportunity CHAPTER SIX: Faith CHAPTER SEVEN: Race CHAPTER EIGHT: The World Beyond Our Borders CHAPTER NINE: Family Epilogue Acknowledgments About the Author Also by Barack Obama Copyright Prologue IT’S BEEN ALMOST ten years since I first ran for political office. I was thirty-five at the time, four years out of law school, recently married, and generally impatient with life. A seat in the Illinois legislature had opened up, and several friends suggested that I run, thinking that my work as a civil rights lawyer, and contacts from my days as a community organizer, would make me a viable candidate. After discussing it with my wife, I entered the race and proceeded to do what every first-time candidate does: I talked to anyone who would listen. I went to block club meetings and church socials, beauty shops and barbershops. If two guys were standing on a corner, I would cross the street to hand them campaign literature. And everywhere I went, I’d get some version of the same two questions. “Where’d you get that funny name?” And then: “You seem like a nice enough guy. Why do you want to go into something dirty and nasty like politics?” I was familiar with the question, a variant on the questions asked of me years earlier, when I’d first arrived in Chicago to work in low-income neighborhoods. It signaled a cynicism...

Words: 120305 - Pages: 482