Free Essay

Subprime Lending

In: Business and Management

Submitted By tareka30
Words 1289
Pages 6
Defining Subprime Lending The problem to be investigated is the effect of subprime mortgage loans on the economy. According to Merriam Webster subprime is defined as having or being an interest rate that is higher than a prime rate and is extended especially to low-income borrowers; extending or obtaining a subprime loan (Webster, 2012). Subprime mortgage loans are loans given to people with a low credit score. Subprime borrowers normally don’t qualify for prime loans or prime lending. According to Jennings, the subprime mortgage market is defined to include those borrowers with a FICO (Fair Isaac Co.) score below 570 (Jennings, 2012, p. 434).
The American Dream Home ownership has always been a big part of the “American Dream.” It allows you to have your piece of “the rock.” It gives one the ability to invest in your community. This need to have a piece of the American dream not only drives the average American to capitalize, it also drives mortgage lenders to take their portion of your dream as well. Initially, this relationship tends to have win/win connotations; however, true colors eventually prevail when dealing in subprime mortgage loans.
Subprime Lenders It seems subprime lenders never call themselves just that. You have to be aware of the enormously high prices; prices much higher than your prime lenders.
Subprime lenders based their rates and fees on the same factors as prime lenders. For example, rates were higher the lower the credit score and the smaller the down payment. However, the entire structure of rates and fees were higher at subprime lenders to cover the greatest risk and higher costs of subprime lending (The Mortgage Professor, June 2009).
Subprime loans tend to go into default at a higher rate than prime loans, because of the initial risks attached to the borrower. Subprime loans also have prepayments written into the loans; whereas prime loans rarely have prepayment clauses. According to Jennings, during its period of expansion, the subprime market was a source of great wealth for many lenders. “We made so much money, you couldn’t believe it. And you didn’t have to do anything. You just had to show up,” commented Kal Elsayed, a former executive at New Central Financial (Jennings, 2012, p. 434).
Predatory Lending When I first moved to Georgia, I worked for a company called Valued Services. Valued Services was the parent company for our “payday lending” operations. I remember seeing the words predatory lender in an article written about the company. Hindsight 20/20, predatory lending is exactly what we were doing. All of our stores were in low income neighborhoods. It was well know they were in “bad” areas because we had bars on the windows of every store we owned. Several of our stores required security during the day, and a police escort at night when the managers would leave with the daily deposit. Instead of the loan assisting the borrower, before it was over with they were in even deeper debt. The interest was at a rate of about 85%, and we would run the postdated check through the borrower’s checking account up to five times. Not only were they accruing large interest rates from the loan with Valued Services, but they were also getting insufficient fund fees. You have to ask the question how ethical was Valued Services. It’s like asking an alcoholic to work in a liquor store. We placed stores in low income areas, and gave consumers loans knowing they were not in positions to pay them back. This is exactly what subprime lenders do. Allow consumers to get loans so they can have a piece of the American dream knowing they won’t be able to pay the loans back. It seems, throughout my professional career, predatory lending has followed me. When I started working for Veolia Transportation I received court ordered bankruptcies every day. When I called the employees’ in, almost all of them had the same story….”I lost my house.” Each employee talked about how they had no problem paying the mortgage for the first few years; then their payments ballooned and they couldn’t make them.
The vast majority of subprime loans are now securitized; leading to claims that securitization facilitates predatory lending and should actively police lenders. New standards to protect borrowers against unfair practices were launched 1 July including requirements to ensure they are not lured into credit contracts they cannot afford to repay. The standards include provisions to stop predatory lenders from exploitative practices such as using household items as security for cash loans (Engel, K. & McCoy, 2007).
Lender and Incentives One has to wonder, why were subprime loans pitched to consumers? They weren’t pushed for altruistic purposes; not from the kindness of the heart. The results were inevitable. According to the readings, subprime loans ended with the same result. They were a risk for the consumer as well as the bank backing the loan. There had to be some incentive for the banks; some benefit that is reaped. In this case, it was a monetary benefit.
Yield-spread premiums is what lenders call them. Consumer groups call them legal kickbacks. YSPs are the cash that mortgage brokers or lenders get for steering a borrower into a home loan with a higher interest rate (Center for Responsible Lending, Yield Spread Premiums (YSPS).
However, the Federal Reserve stepped in and regulated these kickbacks.
New rules issued by the Federal Reserve Board mean that YSPs are no longer legal. The Fed rules ban brokers and loan officers from receiving extra pay based on a loan’s interest rate or other loan terms. Also, brokers can no longer receive “split” compensation, when payment comes from both borrower and lender—brokers must be paid by one or the other (Center for Responsible Lending, Yield Spread Premiums (YSPS).
With these rules in place that is a source of added protection for possible borrowers so that they aren’t victimized.
Lending Institutions after the Meltdown It is hard to imagine how so many risky mortgages could have been authorized by lending institutions. When the inevitable happened and the mortgage rate incentives went to the actual prices, many owners were unable to meet the new payment requirements. As the number of foreclosures became larger, many lenders began to suffer high losses. The effect of
Foreclosures; however, was not uniformed across regions and demographics and seemed to affect certain populations like low-income individuals and minorities more than others. This led to accusations of discriminatory behavior on part of lending institutions. As a result lending institutions were unable to recover their losses on defaulted mortgages.
Subprime wrap up
The subprime mortgage crisis, popularly known as the “mortgage mess” or “mortgage meltdown,” came to the public’s attention when a steep rise in home foreclosures in 2006 spiraled seemingly out of control in 2007, triggering a national financial crisis that went global within the year. Consumer spending is down, the housing market has plummeted, foreclosure numbers continue to rise and the stock market has been shaken. The subprime crisis and resulting foreclosure fallout has caused dissension among consumers, lenders and legislators and spawned furious debate over the causes and possible fixes of the “mess” (Blanco, K, 2008).

Jennings, M. (2012). Business ethics: Case studies and selected readings 7th Ed. Mason, OH: South-Western
Cengage Learning
Engel, K. & McCoy,P. (2007). Turning a Blind Eye: Wall Street
Finance of Predatory Lending. Fordham Law Review; March
2007, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p2039-2103, 65p
Subprime. 2012. In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved
October 24, 2012, from technology
Blanco, K. 2008. The Subprime Lending Crisis: Causes and Effects of the Mortgage Meltdown. Mortgage Compliance
Guide and Bank Digest

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Subprime Lending

...Subprime Lending Discuss in detail the event, the people involved, and its background and impact of America. Before 1930, features of Housing loans presented significant challenges. To obtain a home loan a down payment of half the value the house was required. Further issues with these loans were large balloon payments and short maturities. The pricing for mortgage loans varied widely due to no nationwide housing market. The main funding for these loans was provided by life insurers, thrifts, and commercial banks. By 1932, a housing crisis was wreaking havoc on home loans. The estimated defaulted loans were rising to twenty –five percent. In response to this crisis, the FHL Bank System was designed to provide relief to lending institutions and homeowners. In 1933, President Roosevelt birthed two Acts regarding the housing market. The first was the Home Owners Loan Act. This act established the HOLC, which was designed to slow down the quickly rising foreclosure rate. Under this act, long-term self-amortizing fixed rate mortgages became the new norm. The second act in the New Deal was the National Housing Act. The FHA was created in this act. This protective measurement was used to help the lenders maintain foreclosed homes by adding automatic insurance payments to active loans. The FHA also expanded the use of a fixed rate long-term home loan. In 1938, the American government formed Fanny Mae to provide a secondary market for home mortgages. This secondary market gave...

Words: 1810 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Citigroup and Subprime Lending

...Unit VII Case Study Columbia Southern University Citigroup and Subprime Lending 1. Are there moral concerns associated with subprime lending? Are those moral concerns based on utilitarianism, rights, or justice considerations? Sub-prime lending is a process of giving loans to those who otherwise would not qualify for conditional loan because of poor credit history. There is high risk involved in such loans and therefore, it is offered at high interest rates. It is risky both for the lender and the borrower. There's certainly a private responsibility with regards to a person taking on commitments that will require repaying money borrowed from a person or from an institution. A significant requirement for the borrowers’ part to understand what he or she is getting into to. However, sub-prime lending does have moral concerns. The borrowers are not qualified for regular loans, but they may need it. They are ready to take loans at higher interest rate because they need it and sub-prime lending seems to be a better option to them. The mortgage crisis in the United States was viewed as having good intended utilitarian motives by the corporate world and public policy makers to provide mortgage loans to at risk customers. Utilitarianism is defined by Velasquez (2006) as that initiative that place goodwill the behalf as many people possible. It does well to both lender and the borrower and......

Words: 1032 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ethical and Legal Issues Concerning Sub-Prime Mortgage Lenders

...sub-prime mortgage lenders Outline I. Introduction II. Subprime History III. What lead to subprime lenders making unethical and illegal decisions IV. What safe guards are in place V. Conclusions VI. Works cited page Introduction When most people hear the phrase “subprime lending”, the first thoughts that come to mind are the mortgage meltdown; predatory lenders, high interest mortgages for borrowers who have poor credit or low incomes. All of these thoughts may be true to a certain extent, but contrary to popular belief subprime mortgage lending has helped expand homeownership for all borrowers regardless of credit or income level in the US between 1995 and 2006 (Favro, 07). The problem is that this ethical and legal lending market took an unethical and illegal turn and has been cited as one of the contributing factors that aided in many Americans defaulting on their home loans that resulted in sending this country and many others into one of the biggest recessions since the Great Depression. It has been almost six years since the subprime meltdown and this country, the housing markets, and the economy have yet to fully recovered. In this research paper I will cover the history and original purpose of subprime lending, what lured the subprime lending market to take an unethical and illegal turn, and what safeguards have been put in place to lessen the likely hood of subprime mortgage lenders making unethical and illegal decisions in the......

Words: 2430 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Countrywide Financial: the Subprime Meltdown

...COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL: THE SUBPRIME MELTDOWN I. Problem Statement After buying out Countrywide Financial and resolving the issues against former CFO David Sambol and former CEO Angelo Mozilo, what should be the next steps that Bank of America must take to salvage Countrywide Financial from onslaught of criticisms and lawsuits that already arose and would potentially arise against it? II. Analyzing Case Data In the mid-2000, season where real estate prices were booming and confidence levels were high, even clients who could have qualified for regular loans chose to take out subprime loans to finance their real estates. Just like most businesses, Countrywide did everything to expand their profitability. They gave false assurance to home buyers. So, even consumers with good credit rating get attracted to these mortgages without fully recognizing the possible consequences. The construction industry also used flipping to expand its profit. Speculators also bought existing homes with no intension of keeping them, waiting until the value increases, and selling them at a profit. High demand also caused an increase of the cost of materials. Realtors, on the other hand, were motivated to push sales through because of commissions they could earn, pushing them to take much riskier transactions. Even real estate appraisers began to inflate the value of homes to ensure that loans would go through. Without being foreseen by anyone, US economy began to slow down. People started......

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Study

...and Subprime Lending Unit 7 Case Study Pg 714 -716 1. Are there moral concerns associated with subprime lending? Are those moral concerns based on utilitarianism, rights, or justice considerations? Before we discuss the first question let’s get a working description of what subprime leaning is. A subprime lender is financial entity that has an inclination to lend to consumers that are not qualified for traditional loans due to their poor credit status and history of repayment difficulties. Lending to subprime candidates helped lead to secondary mortgage market issue sin 2008 (“Subprime lender,” 2011). A subprime loan is a loan with elevated fees and interest, given to someone with a lower credit score (“Subprime loan,” 2011). A major profit source for CitiFinancial and the Associates was subprime lending, this is lending to people who did not meet the customary credit requirements of banks. In the 90’s this lending had provided access to credit to many people who would not have qualified for prime loans because of their credit history. In one study the researchers found that 35 percent of the subprime borrowers were over 55 years and African Americans were twice as likely to borrow in the subprime market as in the prime market (Baron, 2010). There were a few forms of subprime lending that CitiFinancial and the Associates dealt with. One of those forms was home equity loans marketed to borrowers to consolidate their bills. Another aspect of subprime......

Words: 3619 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Wrong Assumptions in the Financial Crisis

...CPOIB 5,1/2 Wrong assumptions in the financial crisis Manuel B. Aalbers Amsterdam Institute for Metropolitan and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how some of the assumptions about the current financial crisis are wrong because they misunderstand what takes place in the mortgage market. Design/methodology/approach – The paper discusses four wrong assumptions: one related to regulation, one to leveraging, one to subprime lending and one to predatory lending. It briefly discusses some policy implications. Findings – The role of the state in the mortgage market is more complex than suggested by those who blame the state for not doing anything. The concept of leveraging can explain, at least in part, why the losses in financial markets are bigger than the losses in the housing market. Many subprime loans were sold to prime borrowers. Subprime lending was not designed to increase homeownership rates, but to fuel profits by exploiting vulnerable borrowers. Practical implications – It is too easy to argue that everyone made mistakes; most borrowers cannot be blamed for being sold risky, overpriced loans. A rescue plan is needed for defaulting borrowers and those already in foreclosure. Originality/value – The paper does not present new research, but brings together research that demonstrates that the roots of the crisis in the mortgage market are in many ways different from...

Words: 2271 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Subprime Meltdown: American Housing and Global Financial Turmoil

...Subprime Meltdown: American Housing and Global Financial Turmoil The real estate and financial crisis was caused by a significant rise in mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, leaving repercussions for banks and financial markets globally. The subprime mortgage crises started to become apparent in 2007 resulting in a weakening global financial system. An estimated 80% of US mortgages held by the subprime borrowers were adjustable rate mortgages. Once housing prices reached their peak during the middle of 2006, the steep decline that followed made refinancing difficult. Adjustable rate mortgages began to reset at higher rates resulting in increasing mortgage defaults. Financial firms which held most of the securities backed with subprime mortgages were left with securities with no value. Ultimately, credit around the world tightened as the capital in many banks and US government sponsored enterprises were losing value. What caused the crises can be attributed to a number of factors; the failure of homeowners to meet their mortgage payments, the adjustable rate mortgages resetting along with the extensive lending. In 2008 the mortgage industry played a crucial role in the recession when an estimated 1.5 million homeowners defaulted on payments lending to foreclosure by 2009. As a result, the mortgage industry has restructured limiting individuals to purchase homes. From 2000-2006, home foreclosures began to rise. Thus the government began to investigate the......

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...Subprime Special The term "subprime" refers to the credit status of the borrower, which is being less than ideal. Subprime lending is a general term that refers to the practice of making loans to borrowers who do not qualify for the best market interest rates because of their deficient credit history. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury guidelines issued in 2001, "Subprime borrowers typically have weakened credit histories that include payment delinquencies, and possibly more severe problems such as charge-offs, judgments, and bankruptcies. They may also display reduced repayment capacity as measured by credit scores, debt-to-income ratios, or other criteria that may encompass borrowers with incomplete credit histories." Subprime lending is also called B-Paper, near-prime, or second chance lending. Subprime lending encompasses a variety of credit instruments, including subprime mortgages, subprime car loans, and subprime credit cards, among others. A subprime loan is offered at a rate higher than A-paper loans due to the increased risk. Subprime lending crisis, which began in the United States has become a financial contagion and has led to a restriction on the availability of credit in world financial markets. Hundreds of thousands of borrowers have been forced to default and several major subprime lenders have filed for bankruptcy. Types of subprime lending Subprime mortgages Subprime mortgage loans are riskier loans in that they are made......

Words: 1017 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Subprime Mortgage Term Outline

...The following is an outline of the final paper, which is focusing on subprime mortgages and the housing market bubble. The paper will also analyze Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and how they are linked to the subprime mortgage crisis, including potential solutions to the crisis. References have been added to each section to show which references are being used in which section. References will be added as needed. 1) Abstract a. 120 word overview of paper 2) Introduction a. Introduction to the topic of subprime mortgages and the housing market bubble. b. Timeline of the crisis and housing market bubble burst 3) Discussion Content a. Definitions and background information on the following topics: i. Mortgages ii. Housing Market iii. Subprime Mortgages 1. Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2011). Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1848-1880. 2. Karikari, J., Voicu, I., & Fang, I. (2011). FHA vs. Subprime Mortgage Originations: Is FHA the Answer to Subprime Lending?. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(4), 441-458. doi.10.1007/s11146-009-9218-7. iv. Housing Market Bubble Burst b. Overview and causes of the subprime mortgage crisis i. Fixed mortgage versus floating 1. Demyanyk, Y., & Van Hemert, O. (2011). Understanding the Subprime Mortgage Crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1848-1880. ii. High risk mortgage loans and lending/borrowing practices 1. Peterson, C.L. (2009). Fannie Mae,......

Words: 970 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Housing Bubble

...What is a “Housing Bubble”? Explain Subprime Lending and Why Many Believe That it is the Single Biggest Contributor to the Current Economic Malaise.7 December 2008 | | | | In this paper I will address the definition of a “housing bubble”, discuss subprime lending and why many believe that it is the single biggest contributor to the current economic state. A housing bubble, references real estate markets specifically. It is a type of economic bubble that occurs periodically in local or global real estate markets which is characterized by rapid increases in valuations of real property such as housing, until they reach unsustainable levels relative to income and other economic elements. These bubbles can occur in local and/or global markets. The recent US housing bubble, which peaked in early 2005, some of the major areas that were affected were California, Florida, the Northeast corridor and the Southwest markets. (Wikipedia) It is thought that the major contributor to this bubble was the subprime lending market. According to the financial dictionary, subprime lending occurs when lenders make loans to borrowers who would not ordinarily qualify for credit if customary underwriting practices were to apply. These loans tend to carry higher interest rates than those offered to creditworthy clients. These loans also sometimes assess additional fees such as pre-payment penalties. (The Financial Dictionary) According to the Housing and Urban......

Words: 987 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economic Effects of Sub-Prime Lending

...Economic effects of subprime lending A subprime lending is an option for individuals that have difficulty meeting mortgage payment schedules or for individuals who have low credit scores and considered risky borrowers. For example, an applicant with a low credit score of 500 will have a very difficult time locating a loan. Subprime lending comes with a high cost to borrowers. Lenders see bad credit applicants as riskier than applicants with better credit scores. Borrowers in turn pay for this risk by accepting loans with a higher interest rate. Subprime lenders offered the realization of the American dream of home ownership to borrowers who would otherwise be denied credit. Interest only loan options were offered, and combined with the mortgage-backed securities (MBS) added so much liquidity that in turn created a housing boom. Over time borrowers end up paying higher interest rates with zero payment application against their loan amount. Unemployment setbacks that ultimately resulted in defaults, added to the economic crisis. Consequently, more homes were placed in a market that is already saturated with newly constructed homes. This created less demand resulting to more houses that builders were unable to sell. Controls of banking rules and regulations during the 1980’s were relaxed, and monitoring policies for these were not the highest priority. Jimmy Carter’s “Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980” was a window for financial......

Words: 1551 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Too Big to Fail

...enacted the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), in an effort to mitigate the economic repercussions of the subprime mortgage crisis (Nolen). The crisis was a result of many factors that can be categorized under the term subprime lending, which refers to higher risk loans to individuals with limited creditworthiness. The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act authorized the United States Secretary of the Treasury to spend up to $700 billion to purchase mortgage-backed securities and other troubled assets in order to prevent the collapse of the U.S. financial system (Nolen). Ultimately, the policy resulted in federal bailouts intended to strengthen consumer confidence, increase liquidity, and stabilize the credit market by protecting “too big to fail” banks from failure. Supporters of the bailouts argued that, though it may not be ideal, protecting the largest banks against failure was necessary to prevent an even larger financial crisis from devastating the entire U.S. economy (Slavov). The 2008 financial crisis highlights the dilemma created by “too big to fail” banks, a term given to financial institutions that are so intertwined in the economic system that their failure would result in economy wide repercussions and ultimately give rise to a recession. This was the argument in favor of bailouts in the subprime mortgage crisis. These major banks are so crucial to the economy that if they collapse, other institutions that......

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Subprime Mortgage Crisis

...supervision, irresponsibility, greed and self-interest (Geelan T. , 2011). Community banks had nothing to do with sub-prime lending or the resulting financial crisis, yet they are being caught in the net of the overly far-reaching response. Community banks are the life-blood of the communities they serve. They meet the financial needs of consumers, families, small businesses, foundations and not-for-profit organizations. When the too-big-to fail institutions were worried about their credit default swaps, derivatives, sub-prime loans, and the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) they turned off the lending spigot, while community banks didn’t stop lending (Geelan T. , 2011). So how did we get to where we are? At one point in time, banks would refuse to lend money to people with poor credit history or no income. There were pretty tight qualification guidelines to obtain a mortgage. At that same time, back in the early 2000's, there was “excess capital” globally (The Subprime Mortgage Crisis Explained, 2011). Investment managers were looking for ways to invest money; generally the demand was for low-risk investments that would yield a nice return. However, such investment options were not easy to find. This pushed a great amount of money straight into the U.S. mortgage market, thanks to the unique and wonderful (on principle) vehicle – securitization (The Subprime Mortgage Crisis Explained, 2011). After an individual gets a mortgage loan from a broker, the broker sells......

Words: 883 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Predatory Practices

...blame for this type of behavior. This behavior can come in many different forms. A few examples are: predatory lending, subprime mortgages, and unsolicited credit cards. Because these practices tend to harm consumers, more legislation has been put into place in recent years. Unsolicited credit cards are an example of a predatory practice. In this case, credit card companies would send out credit cards to consumers who had not applied for them. This led to an increase in identity theft. It is now illegal to send unsolicited credit cards through the mail. Predatory lending is probably the most common type of predatory business practice against consumers. According to Wikipedia, “an audit report on predatory lending from the office of inspector general of the FDIC broadly defines predatory lending as imposing unfair and abusive loan terms on borrowers” (Wikipedia, n.d.). Or the practice of a lender deceptively convincing borrowers to agree to unfair and abusive loan terms, or systematically violating those terms in ways to make it difficult for the borrowers to defend against. Predatory lenders are most likely to target the “less educated, the poor, racial minorities, and the elderly but victims of predatory lending are represented across all demographics” (Wikipedia, n.d.). This type of lending usually includes payday loans, title loans, subprime credit cards, etc. These are typically loans backed by some form of collateral, such as a car or house, so that......

Words: 1124 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...SUBPRIME MORTGAGE CRISIS The beginning of 2000s, commodity, especially “petrol” and agricultural products prices was soared unexpectedly. Economic growth of high population countries such as India and China raised demand of agricultural and merchandise products and thus, this demand caused increasing of these products prices. In 2008, not only food prices but also gold and petrol prices reached the highest level in history. On the other hand, while these prices was increasing, the value of the United States Dollar fell than almost all currency units. It was paralelled that the market of real estate particularly “housing prices” decreased a great value in the US in 2006. Hovewer, housing prices started to increase gradually early 2000s in the US because of mortgage. Due to the this increment, banks provided credits to their low income family in order to purchase a new house, but when housing prices fell into decline suddenly, a new credit market which is called subprime mortgage collapsed. In 2006, home mortgage foreclosures were at record highs. From 2006 to 2007 foreclosures fillings grew 75 percent and leaving more than 1 percent of all households in some stage of foreclosure. Foreclosures in the subprime mortgage market were leading the way. In the end of 2006, about 300,000 foreclosure proceedings were initiated, with subprime mortgages accounting for more than half. Majority of these subprime borrowers were low and......

Words: 976 - Pages: 4