Premium Essay

The Democratic-Republican Party

Submitted By
Words 921
Pages 4
There are various political parties that have many connections to the Constitution and have many different views. They influence each other, and branch off of eachother. The Democratic-Republican party was one of the most influential parties which has been used to create other parties in the future. It’s founder was Thomas Jefferson. James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Jackson were other leaders that were involved in this party. It was founded in 1792 and dissolved in 1825.
The ideology of the Democratic-Republican party are American Republicanism, Classical Liberalism, Decentralization, Jeffersonianism, and agrarianism. American Republicanism is governing a state as a republic. Classical Liberalism is protection …show more content…
The Democratic party evolved from the Democratic-Republican party in opposition to the Federalist party. The Democratic party believed in republicanism, weak federal government, and opposed a national bank. Historical figures that helped the origin of the Democratic Party are Andrew Jackson, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. Andrew Jackson was the first Democratic president, and founder of this party. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were founders of the Democratic-Republican party.
The ideology today for the Democratic party's ideology are liberalism, progressivism, centrism, and social liberalism. Liberalism is based off of liberty and freedom. Social Liberalism is similar to Liberalism, but addresses social issues. Progressivism is simply the idea to progress. Centrism is for supporting social equality. The president and the vice president, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, are Democratic. The current Senate Democratic Leader is Harry Reid, and the current House Leader is Nancy Pelosi. Last but not least is the Chair of Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman. These people are all currently representing the Democratic …show more content…
The Constitution Party is a more recent party, which was founded on 1991 by the name of “U.S. Taxpayers Party”. The name was later changed to “Constitution Party” in 1999. It was founded by Howard Phillips.
Their ideologies are paleoconservatism, fiscal conservatism, and social conservatism. Paleoconservatism is stressing tradition, and has limited government and civil society. Fiscal Conservatism, again is lower spending, taxes, and government debt. Social Conservatism is keeping tradition while facing social progressivism.
The Chairman of this party is Frank Fluckiger. He was elected to this position on April 21, 2012. He defeated Randy Stufflebeam at the Constitution Party National Convention.
There have been six conventions in the Constitution Party, there is one held every two to four years.
As of 2014, there are 76,425 members. Thirteen people in the Constitution Party have been elected for various things.
In 2001, one of the current parties was founded, it is called the Green Party. It is the fourth largest in membership in the United States.
They believe in Green Politics, which is environmentalism, non-violence and social

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Federalist Party and the Democratic Republicans Party

...Josh Dean U.S. History to 1877 online Unit 1 essay I chose the northern colonies as the colony that I would most like to live in. I chose the north because it seems more stable for a family to live in. The northern colonies had a much healthier life style with a life span that averaged into the seventies. The north was a much tighter society that lived in smaller communities that worked and socialized together. I also like the fact that the settlements were also more organized then the other two colonies. I like the fact that when the northern colonies layed out a town they did it in an organized fashion with the town hall in the center or town were they would worship and have meeting. Around the town hall they would lay out the houses for the people to live so they were close to the center of town. I think this also would help with town defense against attacking Indians and other hostile groups. I also like the fact that the families were given land that had wood and a place to grow crops. This would help immigrants just arriving that they would have the security of knowing they had land to live on. Also the fact that towns with 50 or more families would start a school, which shows the importance of education in the northern colonies. The fact that the north was moral in most of their choices for the community would be a major factor for me deciding to choose the northern colonies to live in. Like the fact that the northern colonies is the anti-slavery stance...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Democratic And Republican Parties

...There are a several similarities and differences between the republican party and the democratic parties. The similarities include their purpose and their logos. The differences include their current view-points and the time the parties were made. There are a few similarities between the republican and democratic parties. One of the similarities is their purposes. Both the republican party and the democratic party are political parties. According to CliffsNotes, “The basic purpose of political parties is to nominate candidates for public office and to get as many of them elected (into seats in the government) as possible.” Another similarity between the republican and democratic party is their logo. The logos for the republican and democratic parties...

Words: 461 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Thomas Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party

...With a new party in play, a claim was made by Jefferson in his Political Writings declaring, “We of the United States are constitutionally and conscientiously democrats,” (291). Further entertaining the idea of Jefferson’s passion moreover expanding the support for the Republican cause. The Republicans didn’t refer to themselves as the Democratic-Republicans, officially, until 1798 after embracing the mockery of the Federalist Party (Wagner 12). Reinforcing the concept of the Democratic-Republican view, Jefferson affirms, “The main body of our citizens… remain true to the Republican principles,” (Jefferson 416). Making the case for the Democratic-Republicans, seem that much sweeter. They seem more stable as if they have the backing of the country behind them. So, if people have not understood by now, Jefferson claims, “I am not a Federalist, not by religion, philosophy, or politics,” he claims he can think for himself and implies that he does not like the idea of Federalism at all (Jefferson 410)....

Words: 605 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Difference Between Democrats and Republicans

...Is There Really a Difference between the Republican and Democratic Parties? Throughout modern American history, there have been many debates between the Rupublicans and the Democrats. Whether it comes down to what they've done for the american government or how each party differs from one another, there's no question that these two parties are the driving force behind what we know today as the American Government. The truth is, these parties greatly differ from one another and is shown through party ideologies, organization, and certain events in history. The history of the oldest running political party in the world is a complex and diverse one. The democrats, founded by Thomas Jefferson himself, have gone through numerous trials and tribulations to be the politcal party it is today. Stemming from conflicts with the Federalists over Jay's Treaty, it was apparent that " a deep rooted philosophical difference existed between the two factions"( Rutland 10). Because of this struggle for power and differences between the two factions, the Democratic-Republican party was born. Throughout it's history, the democratic party has held onto a few specific ideals that make them different from the republicans. First and foremost, the democratic party started from two main ideals that stem from the Declaration of Indepence, liberty and equality for all. Jefferson believed that the working class people of America werent being treated fairly compared to the wealthy class and landowners...

Words: 252 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The First Party System: Why Thomas Jefferson Was Responsible

...The First Party System: Why Thomas Jefferson was Responsible American History to 1877 Thomas Jefferson is responsible for dividing the Federalist party of the late 1700s and creating what is known today as the first party system. Thomas Jefferson, who supported a small national government and individual rights, changed American politics by advocating rights of small planters and western farmers to divide the nation once united behind Federalist ideals. By dividing the once united Federalist party into two separate groups, he was able to gain the support needed to take the office of the President away from the Federalist party. This feat was more than a challenge for Jefferson and would shape the structure of American political parties forever. (1) In 1788, George Washington was the first President of the United States and he chose two men with contrasting views on what the fate of the United States should be as part of his advisory board. Thomas Jefferson was chosen by Washington as the head of Department of State. Jefferson was a Virginian and diplomat, known for his views on small national government and representing the small planters and western farmers of America. George Washington then chose Alexander Hamilton as his secretary of the Treasury. Born and raised in the Caribbean, he worked for Washington as his aid during the revolutionary war and was a lawyer. Hamilton was known for his views on a strong national government. He favored merchants and financiers...

Words: 1916 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Federalists vs. Democratic Republicans

...The United States of America was founded on a Constitution that was supposed to preserve our freedoms and certain liberties. All Americans at that time wanted to keep America a free an independent nation with rights for its people. However there was two different groups, the Federalists lead by Alexander Hamilton and the Democratic-Republicans led by Thomas Jefferson, which thought this could be achieved in very different ways. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton were very different in their methods to try and develop America as a nation. The two were very much alike because they both were avid Americans, and wanted to see the nation succeed. Both men were very involved in the U.S. Government and tried to voice their opinions on the best method for success. Neither of them would give any ground on their ideas, which created great conflict in the first years of the U.S. Government. Alexander Hamilton was a member of the Federalist Party. He supported a larger central government where the states had less power than the Federal government. Hamilton believed that bigger central government would provide assistance to programs and business to help them succeed. “Not only the wealth but the independence and security of a country appear to be materially connected with the prosperity of manufacturers” (Document C).Hamilton thought that the U.S. should lean more towards a manufacturing economy opposed to an agricultural one. Along with that idea Hamilton thought that...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Love

...(1780). Stronger central government, state representation from states each 2 representatives, no Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation useless, because states had more power, wanted larger public, and they believed in large farming and industrialization,.. antif federalist, wanted state rights, wanted add the House of Represeantives, Bill of Rights, they thought the aritcles needed to be ratified not taken away completely, smaller public, believed Americas future is small farming Federalists vs. Democratic-Republicans (1790s) – Hamiltonians (known as federalist party) vs. the Jeffersonians (Democratic Party) Differences between Federalist stances (1780s) vs. Federalist Party stances (1790s)- Federalist of 1780-Stronger central government, state representation from states each 2 representatives, no Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation useless, because states had more power, wanted larger public, and they believed in large farming and industrialization.. Federalist Party Stances of (1790)- Led by Alexander Hamilton strong central government led by the wealthy and industry, emphasis on manufacturing ,trading, and shipping.. loose interpretation...

Words: 2158 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

History of Political Parties

...Political Parties: A Brief History Erick Henriquez HIST 101 American Military University Kristin Sawicki Modern Political Parties: A Brief History In the news there is always talk about social issues. When a politician is running for office, he or she will have opinions about these issues. These opinions will usually side with their political parties agenda. Parties while not originally in the constitution became a vehicle where like-minded people can congregate and discuss similar opinions. Political parties have been instrumental in shaping the United States. Lets go back to the year 1792 when the First Party system was created. Alexander Hamilton the newly appointed U.S treasury secretary believed in an America with a strong central government whose duty was to grow manufacturing to increase economic development. Meanwhile on the other side of the fence was Thomas Jefferson. His vision of America was different, he believed in an American government that allowed agriculture to thrive by limiting central government and allowing the states to handle local matters. By limiting the involvement of central government, farmers would be able to grow their crops in peace and, trade the fruits of their labors for manufactured goods with neighboring countries (Henretta, J. A., & Edwards, R. 2012 p.199). With these ideologies in mind, both men started campaigning for supporters. Those who sided with Thomas Jefferson became known as the Democratic-Republican Party and...

Words: 1065 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Abortion

...1. George Washington- Served 8 years as president. He was a neutral party. Foreign Policies - was to remain neutral, and form as little alliances and deals with other countries as possible to avoid being dragged into a war, Jay Treaty helping with trade with Great Britian. Domestic Policies – Signed in the Residence Act of 1790, invoked the Militia Act of 1792 One positive aspect that Washington created was imposing an excise tax on distilled spirits, which led to protests in frontier districts when this happened the military was not big enough in just Pennsylvania so he had to invoke the Militia Act. 2. John Adams – Served 4 years as president, was part of the Federalist Party. Domestic Policy- Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, the Direct Tax of 1798 Foreign Policy - The XYZ Affairs, Treaty of Mortefontaine When Adams signed and instated the Direct Tax act which was taxing on land to pay for our country to rebuild the navy was a positive thought but the negative consequences was the Fries’s Rebellion it created. 3. Thomas Jefferson – Served 8 Years as president. His party was the Democratic- Republican. Foreign Policies- Louisiana Purchase and the Embargo Tax Act Domestic Policies – He drastically cut the federal government reducing spending in his administration as well as the armed forces, he voluntarily stepped down after two terms and declared that no president should serve more than two terms. One positive Jefferson had while in office is he reduced the national...

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Two-Party Politics

...Associate Level Material Appendix D Two-Party Politics Part 1: Matrix Complete the matrix by describing the beliefs and ideals of each of the parties. Generate a list of at least 10 of President Jefferson’s decisions and actions. Decide which party’s ideals are most aligned with the decision or action and provide an explanation of why the decision or action aligns with that party. |Decisions and Actions |Democratic-Republican Party’s Beliefs and Ideals |Federalist Party’s Beliefs and Ideals | |Less formal White House, from parties and |These actions line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist Party believed in keeping an air of elegance about the | |dress, to mode of transportation for the |because they were for less government, and definitely against creating |office of president, as well as maintaining a formal attitude in the White| |president. |another monarchy. Also, this party stood more for the lower classes. |House | |Jefferson repealed many taxes and reduced |These actions also line up with the Democratic-Republican Party’s beliefs |The Federalist’s were in favor of taxation, knowing that some form of | |the number of federal employees. |and ideals for small, weak government. Repealing taxes put the...

Words: 1061 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Hartford Convention, Rush-Bagot Agreement, and the Monroe Doctrine

...held from December 15, 1814 to January 5, 1815 at Hartford, Connecticut. Delegates from the Federalist party from Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Vermont attended the Hartford Convention. 1 The Federalist Party was a political party which opposed President James Madison's trade policies (which continued President Jefferson's blockage of trade with Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars), as well as his continuation of the War of 1812.2 When Madison was re-elected in 1812 the discontent in New England intensified. In late 1813 Madison signed a more restrictive embargo act than any of those approved by Jefferson, this time prohibiting all trade between American ports (the coastal trade) and fishing outside harbors.3This conference occurred at a time in the war of 1812 "when American prospects seemed darkest".3 The purpose of the convention was to discuss "public grievances and concerns" , that is, among other things, the conduct of the war by the Democratic-Republican Party.4 Although the Federalist party was established with the idea of a stronger central government,5 this meeting/convention of New England Federalist adopted a strong states' rights position and expressed its grievances in a series of resolutions against military conscription and commercial regulations.6 The delegates of this convention argued that the Democratic-Republican Congress violated the Constitution by declaring an unwanted war.4 As a result, those states not did not...

Words: 1216 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Did Borden Compromise With The Democratic Republican Party?

...Jefferson’s personal affiliation with the Democratic Republican party, Jefferson was more concerned with the good of the country as a whole than his own petty sectionalist disputes, and for that reason was willing to compromise with members of the Federalist party and his own Republican beliefs to do that which he believed was in the best interest of the country as a whole. Borden argues that the nature in which Jefferson won the election was in and of itself a compromise, as his victory ultimately hinged on the support of Federalists like Alexander Hamilton. Borden argues that the Federalists’ faith in Jefferson indicates their assurance that Jefferson would compromise on his own personal beliefs if the result was ultimately beneficial to the country....

Words: 476 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Abraham Lincoln's Background: The Republican Party

...The Republican Party Background The Republican party was formed from the Whig Party Wisconsin on March 20, 1854 ” . It was a party that was created to help free slaves in the western areas in 1834. The reason why the Whig Party was formed into the Republican party was because the Whig Party didn’t work out so well and they had a lot of arguments. .The Republicans gained a lot of supporters from the North to help increase their chances of presidency election. Because of their, John C. Fremont , from the Republican Party, won their first election for President in 1856. Later in November 1860, Abraham Lincoln, which was also from the Republican Party, won presidency over the Democratic Party to decrease the level of threats toward salves. In...

Words: 878 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The Democratic Party

...Selena Briones 8 November 2012 Government The Democratic Party The Democratic Party is one of two major contemporary political parties in the United States along with the Republican Party. Since the 1930s, the party has promoted a social liberal and progressive platform, and its Congressional caucus is composed of progressives, liberals, centrists, and left-libertarians. The Democratic party believes, Rights of the Individual, Freedoms of the Individual, Responsibilities of the Individual, and Beliefs Concerning Societal Conditions and Governmental Responsibilities. The party has the lengthiest record of continuous operation in the United States and is among the oldest political parties in the world. The Democratic Party evolved from Anti-Federalist factions that opposed the fiscal policies of Alexander Hamilton in the early 1790s. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison organized these factions into the Democratic-Republican Party. The party favored states' rights and strict adherence to the Constitution; it opposed a national bank and wealthy, moneyed interests. The Democratic-Republican Party ascended to power in the election of 1800. Andrew Jackson is typically considered the first Democratic President of the United States. Current President of the United States Barack Obama is the 15th Democrat to hold that office. As of the 112th Congress following the 2010 elections, the Democratic Party currently holds a minority of seats in the House of Representatives and a...

Words: 498 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Gun Control

...makers across the country to take the issue seriously and deliver policy solutions. Although not an entirely partisan issue, public opinion polls as well as voting histories, indicate that the Democratic Party support gun control legislation, while the Republican party are to a greater degree, in favour of opposing gun control laws (1). The Democratic Party believes that the individual right to bear arms is important and that it will preserve Americans’ Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. But at the same time, believes that firearms should be subject to reasonable regulation, which include, strengthening the background check system, reinstating assault weapons bans and closing gun show loopholes (2). The party understands the terrible consequences of gun violence and is determined to ensure that through increased regulation; guns do not fall into the hands of those irresponsible, law-breaking few. The Republican Party on the contrary, believes in the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, as it is a law-abiding citizens’ God-given right of self-defence. The party call for the protection of such fundamental individual rights, as recognized in the Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago affirming that right (3). Furthermore, the party hold the position that individuals have a right to obtain and store ammunition without registration and support the right to self-defence and federal legislation that would expand the exercise...

Words: 1642 - Pages: 7