Whistleblowers

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jlaird200990
Words 625
Pages 3
Debbie Laird
Whistleblowers
October 25, 2015
Law, Ethics and Corporate Government

Whistleblowers
The term “whistleblower” is sometimes referred to as snitch, rat, or disgruntled employee. In today’s business world with corruption such as that of Enron, which helped to make whistleblowing a household term, employees who witness corrupt or unethical business practices taking place need to have a channel and they need protection that if they blow the whistle, then they will be protected by the US Government. Being a whistleblower takes courage as whistleblowing is not an easy thing to do. To better understand whistleblowing, this paper attempts to define whistleblowers, the characteristics of whistleblowing and what motivates whistleblowing. This paper also includes the details of a whistleblowing case regarding JC Penney and their whistleblower, Robert Blatchford.
A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed dishonest, illegal, and unethical or corrupt (Miriam Webster Dictionary). A whistleblower can be described as a person or employee who is unselfishly motivated, who is practical, and who is uninterested in altering their behavior and someone who allow their own attitude to guide them. Sometimes, whistleblowers can be described as revengeful. Many times whistleblowers are very well educated people who hold professional positions in the business world.
JC Penney is a national department store chain, based out of Texas, which is publically traded. The company has been in the news quite often over the course of the past several years, including stock prices declines and the appointment of a new CEO. Recently, JC Penney has been in the news for a whistleblowing case involving business practices in their ST. Petersburg, Florida store.
Robert Blatchford, a JC Penney employee in the ST. Petersburg Florida store…...

Similar Documents

Whistleblower

...Take a look at the “Meet with whistleblowers” link on the main page. There you will find a number of people who have “blown the whistle” on the organization they work for. Through additional research you will find that there have been a number of people who blew the whistle and rightfully so, and perhaps you’ll find others that are questionable. In a 6-8 page paper, research at least two people who blew the whistle and present your findings. Your findings will show one person who did it and came out with a win for him/herself as well as for the good of society. Your other one will show someone who perhaps should have done nothing, or at least show that so far (because there case is not done) they have only hurt themselves and/or their family. Remember this is research, not your opinion. Personal opinions do not count in research papers, just facts. Some things to consider: 1. What is the obligation of an employee to his company versus society? 2. What might be the consequences of whistleblowing? 3. How might you avoid the mistake of an inappropriate allegation? 4. Are there any laws to protect whistleblowers? 5. Who do you go to, to blow the whistle? 6. Depending on the severity of what you’re going to whistle on, do you think your life and/or your families could be in danger? Can you find a documented case on this? 7. There’s a perception in Washington that much more leaking is going on now than during previous administrations. Is leaking a form a......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Cma Whistleblower Paper

... of travelling to her Canadian missions that she was responsible for * Telling her not to complete trip reports then accusing her of incompetence * Publically removing her from her position She eventually filed a lawsuit in 1998 which lasted over twelve years, prolonged by defense lawyers. Joanna sued her superiors including the minister who she had also approached for help. In the midst legislation was put in place with a clause that would remove the right of public employees to sue their employers. The lawsuit was eventually settled although the terms of the settlement are unknown. "Public revelations of corporate and government malfeasance have spawned an industry of consultants and speakers preaching to the boardrooms on the need for organizational integrity”. Situations like this cause individuals to avoid participating in such matters and it has increased distrust in the government and specific industries. Numbers of employees witness inappropriate actions but do not speak out in fear of consequences such as the ones Joanna had to face. After her experience, Joanna founded the Federal Accountability Initiative for Reform (FAIR), a Canadian public interest organization. Her organization has played a substantial role in the formation of legislations within Canada regarding whistle-blowing. The organization brought the very first legislation of protecting whistleblowers to the Parliament of Canada. It eventually passed the Servants Disclosure Protection Act...

Words: 638 - Pages: 3

Whistleblower

... your professor for any additional instructions. • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: • Apply the concepts of freedom versus responsibility and ethical decision making. • Compare the legal concepts of corporate governance with the ethics of corporate social responsibility. • Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will doctrine and exceptions, as well as the protections afforded whistleblowers. • Explore the legal and ethical issues surrounding employee and consumer privacy. • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance. • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics. Click here to view the grading rubric....

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Filing Whistleblower Complaints Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

...RE: Filing Whistleblower Complaints under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ARTICLE SYNOPSIS In relating to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX Act) of 2002, the article defines how personnel that work for companies that are traded publicly or are required to file with the SEC rate protection against retaliation when reporting mail, bank, wire, or securities fraud, regulation and rule violation of the SEC, or violations of other “Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders” (Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 2011). LEGAL ISSUE The article addresses how whistleblowers can defend themselves under SOX; something that has occurred several times over the decades in business. Whistleblowers uncover fraud and deception to the government and, in some cases, the public. This forces businesses to operate in accordance with federal law. MANAGERIAL PERSPECTIVE The affect this protection affords employees of such companies is tremendous. Jeffrey Wigand is one such employee who would have benefitted from this act in 1996. Mr. Wigand disclosed the facts about big tobacco causing a major lawsuit with millions in damages to the public (Salter, 2002). Barron Stone filed a lawsuit under SOX by whistleblowing on Duke Energy for their improper accounting procedures (Ebeling, 2003). In Mr. Wigand’s case he was not protected therefore could not avoid his legal problems. Mr. Stone did benefit from protection under SOX thus avoided legal issues. Both big tobacco and Duke Energy......

Words: 327 - Pages: 2

Whistleblower Policy

... definition of individuals covered by the policy, responsibility for reporting violations, applicable areas of complaints and those responsible for addressing them, the prevention of retaliation against whistleblowers, the process of reporting violations, confidentiality, the compliance officer’s duties, procedures for acknowledging reported violations and the involvement of the audit committee, if applicable, in complaints involving internal controls and auditing. Form 990: The Form 990 instructions state that a whistleblower policy should serve three purposes: (1) it should encourage staff and volunteers to come forward with credible information regarding illegal practices or violations of adopted policies of the organization; (2) the policy should explicitly state that the organization will protect the individual from retaliation for coming forward with the information; and (3) it should identify those staff, board members or outside parties to whom such information can be reported (IRS Form 990 instructions, available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i990.pdf#page=20). Thus, the corporation must adopt a policy that meets at least these three purposes in order to answer “yes” to Section VI, Line 13 of the Form 990. « 3 Whistleblowing can be defined in a number of ways. In its simplest form, whistleblowing involves the act of reporting wrongdoing within a corporation to internal or external parties. Internal whistleblowing entails reporting the information to a source...

Words: 4784 - Pages: 20

Whistleblower

...Whistleblowers have key characteristics. An individual becomes a whistleblower when they report a person or organization for wrong-doing, misconduct, corruption, unethical or illicit activity. Whistleblowers can expose the information internal to the organization or external to regulators and the media. Whistleblowers are unselfish, courageous and necessary. In many cases, a whistleblower feels the organization is violating the law or endangering the welfare of others. (Halbert, 2012) Blow the whistle1 The cases, U.S. ex rel. Edwards v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-00220 is one instance of whistleblowing in a publicly traded company. Keith Edwards was awarded $63.9 million for blowing the whistle on JPMorgan Chase & Co’s. He was the current assistant vice president supervising a government insuring unit in 2008 before his termination. He had been working for the company five miserable years when he first sued under the federal False Claims Act. Edwards claimed JPMorgan Chase & Co’s defrauded the government into insuring home loans that didn’t qualify for FHA and VA guarantee. Many of these loans ended in evictions and foreclosures. Edwards reported wrong doing and misconduct that endangered the welfare of stockholders, taxpayers and the government. His actions were justified and had an effect on both his career and JPMorgan Chase and Co’s. Edwards was terminated and mistreated after reporting his...

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Whistleblower

...Running Head: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Gary Noguera Strayer University LEG-500 Law, Ethics, & Corporate Governance January 25, 2015 Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley A whistleblower is someone that exposes misconduct or any illegal behavior within an organization or business. These individuals are known to be infamous for their actions. A whistleblower discloses information and behavior that most supervisors and managers do not get to witness personally. Being involved in whistleblowing can cause much chaos. It can have a direct effect on their job, such as a demotion of position. There are cases where whistleblowers have lost their lives due to the important and sacredness of the information that was discloses to expose others. There are two different types of whistleblowers. There is the internal whistleblower, which exposes those within an organization and then you have the external whistleblowers which exposes those outside an organization. Whistleblowers do the complete opposite of what most individuals in corporate America do, cover up one another. Whistleblowers always go around their boss, never tell their boss what they want to hear but only the truth, and they always give a report for what the boss does not want reported. This can cause major chaos in the whistleblower’s life. Not only could their family be affected by their...

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Whistleblowing

...Whistleblowing LEG 500 Whistleblowing in a Publicly Traded Company Whistleblowing implies the imperative necessity to alert others (company) about immorality issues, including illegal activity, happening inside the organization. For the employee who decides to blow the whistle “usually brings to he/she undesirable consequences.” Some consequences are like threats, loss of employment, and social rejection. (Chiu,R. 2003) Whistleblower Traits Whistleblowers are characterized by strong ethic-moral values. They are perceived as an active person with enough courage to expose the wrongdoing occurring inside their company. They are “perceived as altruistically driven individuals who are steered by their attitudes.” The whistleblower is characterized by being an altruistically motivated person, perfectionist, professionally well educated, self-driven attitudes, conscious invariant behavior, and functional utilitarian. They are competent and professionals. Usually, the whistleblower act in good faith and they think they act for the best of the company. They have access to relevant information from the business that allows them to be aware of unlawful situations. Having this position in the business makes the easy to share information with the superiors or in another scenario to the authorities. A publicly traded company affected by whistleblowing is Rabanxy Inc. (NSE: Ranbaxy) Ranbaxy is an Indian Multinational pharmaceutical company that was producing generics...

Words: 636 - Pages: 3

Leg 500 Week 3 Assignment

...A++PAPER;http://www.homeworkproviders.com/shop/leg-500-week-3-assignment/ LEG 500 WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT Assignment 1: Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Due Week 3 and worth 100 points Use the Internet or Strayer Library to research instances of whistleblowing in publicly traded companies within the last 12 months. Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you: Describe the key characteristics of a whistleblower, and briefly summarize one (1) researched instance of whistleblowing in one (1) publicly traded company within the last 12 months. Include the details of the issue that the whistleblower reported and the effect of the whistleblower’s actions on both the whistleblower himself and the company. Decide whether or not the whistleblower was justified in reporting the company’s actions. Provide a rationale for your response. Examine the extent to which the whistleblower would be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Justify your response. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment.Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the......

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Case Analysis for Chapter 3, Case Number 3-5 Irs Whistleblower and Informing on Tax Cheats

... already gained over 2 million awards from first two whistleblowing, so it’s very unlikely he did it again just for monetary rewards. It is his intention to act ethically and maintain the order. 5.2 Is it ethical for a Wall Street insider to analyze financial data of an unrelated company in order to identify corporate wrongdoing, report it to the appropriate authorities and then receive a whistleblowing reward? I think it is ethical for Mr. ABC to do so. The purpose of monetary rewards is to encourage whistleblowers to go to appropriate authorities to disclose illegal or immoral practices. If Mr. ABC did not reveal the fact to IRS and no one else did so, ITW would have kept avoiding tax, which would lead to a bigger fraud. The existence of people like Mr. ABC also gives those companies who tend to conduct fraud a warning so fraud activities are likely to be reduced. 5.3 Consider Mr. ABC’s motivation for blowing the whistle in the ITW case and the fact that it was the third time he had engaged in whistleblowing to the IRS. Using Kohlberg’s model of moral development, at what stage of ethical reasoning would you say Mr. ABC was at? Why? I would say Mr. ABC is at Level 2-Conventional, stage 4: Law and Order. Stage 4 behavior emphasizes the morality of law and duty to the social order. One’s duty to society, respect for authority and maintaining the social order become the focus of decision making. Mr. ABC followed laws and IRS regulations to blow the whistle......

Words: 555 - Pages: 3

Kim Emigh, Worldcom Whistleblower

...Kim Emigh, Worldcom Whistleblower When he was performing his job, Kim Emigh found out weird the relationship there was between the vendor of hardware and some executives of Worldcom. Some very expensive bills made him feel there was a problem with these deals, just like someone would receive a kickback from these operations. When one of his superior came to see him, and gave him 10 statements of work with missing social security number, or some with the social number use couple time, or already listed in the company, Emigh decided to talk to his boss to let them know this situation. He blew the whistle a first time, and changes his position in the company to avoid being in contact with in former boss. The fact is the company was not doing well, the forecast of the market where higher than what is the realty. So, instead of being the bills on time, the supplier had to wait a longer period than usual. After his first attempt to get some answers from his superior, he received, couple year later, a mail asking the accountant of the company to change the entry in the book of some items. The mail was asking the accountant to violate on of the accounting principle. Instead of charging some capital project as a capital cost, the accountants were asking to book these cost as an expense for the company. To make it simpler and explain what the consequences of this violation are, a capital project is an asset to the company, and turn them into an expanse will have some effects on...

Words: 563 - Pages: 3

An Article Summary of Crying Foul: Whistleblower Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, Umang Desai, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 2011, 43 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 427.

...FRAUD AND SOCIETY ARTICLE SUMMARY 9 This is an article summary of CRYING FOUL: WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS OF THE DODD-FRANK ACT OF 2010, Umang Desai, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 2011, 43 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 427. This Article examines how the Dodd-Frank Act, would encourage whistleblower participation in the promotion of corporate governance in an attempt to restore integrity in the corporate world and the financial markets after the wave of the several of the major fraudulent scandals. The provisions of the Act, are more likely to increase the financial burden on both corporations and the government, but however it has some consequences that could greatly diminish the positive impact of this legislation. To delineate the goals and effects of any whistleblower provisions, it is important to understand the historical treatment of whistleblowers in the legislation and corporate practice. Accordingly, after examining the basic concepts of corporate governance, as well as prior treatment of whistleblowers in the existing whistleblower’s legislation. The primary goals of corporate governance in a market-based system include full disclosure and the production of accurate financial information. Whistleblowers have the potential to play an important role in this system because they are often the first to know when corporate disclosures are inaccurate. Corporate governance regulations are also intended to align the goals of the corporation's leaders with those of its...

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

Effect of Whistleblower on National Security

...Court Systems and Jurisdiction—Supreme Court Sides With Wal-Mart Question 1 The processes that this case has to go through to get to the Supreme Court are as follows: The plaintiff has to file a document at the clerk of the court stating the reason plaintiff is suing defendant and actions the court should take, then a copy of this complaint and summons are delivered to the defendant. The defendant will now file an answer to agree or disagree with the complaint, information about the case is exchange between both parties and the case will be tried before a Judge or Jury. The judge makes decision or gives the jury verdict and the losing party may accept or appeal the lower court decision at a higher court. Appeals Court reviews the report of the lower court and affirms reverse or remands the case back to lower court. The plaintiffs were not happy about the ruling of the Appeal Court so she files a petition with Supreme Court to review decision of lower court records. Supreme Court decided to hear the case, listing to both parties’ attorneys, looked at the evidences presented, and make their judgment in favor of Wal-Mart. Question 2 Majority opinion can be said to be an opinion or conclusion agreed to by all the presiding judges over a case. The ruling of the Supreme Court Justices over Wal-Mart case can be said to be majority opinion, “writing for the five-member court majority, Justice A. Scalia said that in order to sue as a single class, the women would...

Words: 641 - Pages: 3

Leg500 Assignment 1

... Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley Act Student Name College or University Name LEG500 – Law, Ethics, and Corporate Governance Professor’s Title Date Whistleblowing and Sarbanes-Oxley The federal government passed and put into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) to primarily protect whistleblowers from retaliation for reporting corporate fraud and financial malfeasance to the government. The negligence became apparent in the 1990’s when corporations such as Enron, HealthSouth, Tyco and WorldCom were found to have grossly overstated their earnings. This cost billions of dollars in losses to shareholders and caused the near-collapse of the stock market (Prentice, 2010, p. 17). The companies were able to hide, scam or misrepresent their earnings due to the dot-com boom, soaring investments, and auditor fraud. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains many sections, sub-sections and creation of other agencies to enforce it. It was a sweeping change to standard reporting practices and was created to restore investor confidence, hold corporations and auditors financially and criminally accountable, and protect whistleblowers. Prior to the creation of SOX the whistleblower had no protection from retaliation by the organization. Whistleblowers had fears of criminal prosecution, bodily harm and job loss if they reported the misdeeds of their employer both publicly and privately. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 redefined the whistleblower. An examination of the characteristics of a...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Whistleblower Bill

... ethical for you to announce that on Facebook? Just because it's true and others may be curious about it doesn't give you the ethical right to reveal it.  In her book Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation, Harvard philosopher Sissela Bok explains that the ethics of revealing secrets lies in the nature of what is being exposed: “Whistleblowing and leaks may be starkly inappropriate when used in malice or in error... the judgment expressed by whistleblowers concerns a problem that should matter to the public. Certain outrages are so blatant, and certain dangers so great, that all who are in a position to warn of them have a prima facie obligation to do so. Conversely, other problems are so minor that to blow the whistle would be a disproportionate response.” Thus some of what WikiLeaks does is ethical, and some is not. In its three-year history, WikiLeaks has released a wide variety of information from the Church of Scientology’s “secret” bibles to tax-evading Swiss banks. But much of the material that WikiLeaks has published has had little to do with revealing “unethical behavior” in governments and corporations. While many consider Scientology to be a science-fiction-based cult, for example, divulging its teachings (though secret) hardly qualifies as exposing corruption or "murderous leadership.” One recent example that made the front page of the November 29 issue of The New York Times is a cable that “reveals for the first time that the United States...

Words: 747 - Pages: 3