Premium Essay

Masterpiece Cakeshop Discrimination Case

Submitted By
Words 604
Pages 3
A common debate between Democrats and Republicans, the topic of same-sex marriage has spread across America since 1969. Yet in the small town of Lakewood, Colorado, it runs even deeper than politics- it’s a matter of constitutional rights. In the case Masterpiece Cakeshop, LTD. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the Supreme Court must look on either side of the debate to decide who’s civil rights were violated- a devout Christian’s, or a same-sex couple’s. Whose side will they rule out? Well, due to precedent cases, it can be determined that the Supreme Court will rule that the couple’s rights were violated through the Fourteenth Amendment.
In July 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins went to Petitioner Masterpiece Cakeshop, a Colorado bakery, in search of a wedding cake. However the owner, Jack Phillips, denied their request as he believed creating a same-sex cake would contradict his religious beliefs. …show more content…
This act of discrimination, they brought on, violated the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA). This closely-viewed document reads, “It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of…sexual orientation… the full and equal enjoyment of the goods” (CADA). The Division deduced that the couple’s claims were supported by probable cause, which led Craig and Mullins to file with the Office of Administrative Courts. The Administrative Law Judge found for Craig and Mullins, although Masterpiece Cakeshop appealed the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Supreme Court Case: Curt-Freeed Versus Stutzman's Flowers

...In the recent Supreme Court case, ROBERT INGERSOLL and CURT FREED v. ARLENE'S FLOWERS, INC, a florist, Barronelle Stutzman, refused to provide flowers for the marriage between Curt Freed and his husband Robert Ingersoll. Stutzman had sold the couple flowers before but refused to sell for their wedding, stating that it was against her religion. When taken to the lower court system, Stutzman was fined one thousand dollars on the decision that the “Public accommodations laws do not simply guarantee access to goods or services, instead, they serve a broader societal purpose: eradicating barriers to the equal treatment of all citizens.” Stutzman’s attorney immediately asked for the Supreme Court to overturn the decision. If Stutzman was selling wedding flowers for heterosexual couples, it is unjust to deny a...

Words: 476 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Vs Civil Liberties Essay

...basically the freedom of citizens being able to exercise their basic rights off of the Bill of Rights without the government interfering. Civil Liberties include freedom of speech, privacy, right to marry, vote, bear arms, legal counsel, and the list goes on. Civil Rights are people being protected from discrimination of certain characteristics for instance, sexual preference, gender, and race. Civil liberties and civil rights are similar in which they both protect citizens and are supposed to help us feel safe and protected by the government. Civil Rights are more specific in my opinion, Civil Liberties are just basic rights being protected. Civil Rights have more of an influence in my life because I like the idea that if...

Words: 515 - Pages: 3